Chemosynthetic symbioses between bacteria and invertebrates occur worldwide from coastal sediments to the deep sea. Most host groups are restricted to either shallow or deep waters. In contrast, Lucinidae, the most species-rich family of chemosymbiotic invertebrates, has both shallow- and deep-sea representatives. Multiple lucinid species have independently colonized the deep sea, which provides a unique framework for understanding the role microbial symbionts play in evolutionary transitions between shallow and deep waters. Lucinids acquire their symbionts from their surroundings during early development, which may allow them to flexibly acquire symbionts that are adapted to local environments. Via metagenomic analyses of museum and other samples collected over decades, we investigated the biodiversity and metabolic capabilities of the symbionts of 22 mostly deep-water lucinid species. We aimed to test the theory that the symbiont played a role in adaptation to life in deep-sea habitats. We identified 16 symbiont species, mostly within the previously described genus Ca. Thiodiazotropha. Most genomic functions were shared by both shallow-water and deep-sea Ca. Thiodiazotropha, though nitrogen fixation was exclusive to shallow-water species. We discovered multiple cases of symbiont switching near deep-sea hydrothermal vents and cold seeps, where distantly related hosts convergently acquired novel symbionts from a different bacterial order. Finally, analyses of selection revealed consistently stronger purifying selection on symbiont genomes in two extreme habitats - hydrothermal vents and an oxygen-minimum zone. Our findings reveal that shifts in symbiont metabolic capability and, in some cases, acquisition of a novel symbiont accompanied adaptation of lucinids to challenging deep-sea habitats.
Numerous environments in Earth’s oceans are characterized by the availability of both molecular oxygen and reduced compounds, such as hydrogen sulfide, methane, and hydrogen; conditions where chemosynthetic organisms can thrive . Diverse invertebrate lineages have evolved to exploit these niches by tapping into the metabolic capabilities of chemosynthetic bacteria through symbiotic associations that have allowed them to thrive in a diverse range of environments such as deep-sea hydrothermal vents and cold seeps, shallow coastal seagrass beds, and coral reefs [1,2,3,4,5,6,7]. Despite their geochemical similarities, these environments can vary greatly in the concentrations and availability of particular reduced compounds, oxygen and other nutrients that support chemosynthetic symbioses . As a result of these differences, invertebrates have formed chemosymbiotic associations with numerous phylogenetically distinct lineages of sulfur-oxidizing chemolithoautotrophic bacteria that may be specialized for particular niches . These bacteria are often acquired from the surrounding environment, a strategy allowing the host to preferentially select bacteria better adapted to local conditions, and in some cases, the host may switch symbionts and acquire novel, distantly related bacterial symbionts if these confer greater benefit . Symbiont switching holds immense potential for evolutionary novelty, as the rapid acquisition of novel symbiont phenotypes could allow expansions into novel ecological niches, such as different habitats or trophic modes. However, novel symbiotic partner combinations can also be inefficient due to a lack of coevolutionary history and novel host-symbiont associations can have negative fitness consequences that might be exacerbated by novel environmental conditions . Insights into the biodiversity and metabolic function of bacteria in these flexible relationships is critical to understanding how the environment shapes host-microbe symbioses.
The bivalve family Lucinidae is a species-rich group known mostly from shallow-waters. The highest diversity is typically found in seagrass and coral reef environments in the tropical Atlantic and Indo-West Pacific . All lucinids studied to date form a symbiosis with chemolithoautotrophic Gammaproteobacteria [12,13,14,15], which they acquire from the environment during early development [16,17,18]. Recent genomic studies have unveiled the diversity of symbionts associated with shallow-water lucinids from the Caribbean and Mediterranean, as well as provided insights into their core metabolic functions, which include sulfur oxidation, carbon fixation, and nitrogen assimilation [12,13,14,15, 19]. Additionally, the ability to fix nitrogen has been found to be a hallmark trait of the Ca. Thiodiazotropha symbiont genus, the primary symbiont lineage associated with lucinid clams , and is likely to be a critical adaptation to life in oligotrophic and nitrogen-limited seagrass and coral reef environments [13, 20, 21]. Despite recent progress in understanding the global biogeography and genomic potential of the lucinid symbionts [12,13,14,15, 19], much of our existing knowledge is limited to studies in the Caribbean and Mediterranean, and these efforts only scratch at the surface of the diversity within the lucinid family, as species from temperate and deep-water habitats have often been overlooked [12,13,14,15, 19].
Deep-water sampling expeditions around the Indo-West Pacific and Madagascar over the last decade led to the discovery of an unexpected diversity of lucinids, many previously unknown to science, in offshore shelf and bathyal sediments (Fig. 1A) . The evolutionary history of deep-water lucinids is diverse and complex. While some groups, such as members of the genus Lucinoma, have radiated primarily in deeper-water habitats around the globe, other taxa are derived from independent deep-water colonization events originating from shallow-water ancestors . Deep-water lucinids have colonized environments where an abundant supply of reduced sulfur compounds, of either biogenic or geothermal origin, occurs in close proximity to oxidants like oxygen and nitrate (e.g. sediments enriched by sunken vegetation and organic falls, hydrocarbon seeps, and hydrothermal vents) [23,24,25]. The physical conditions in these deep-water environments pose very different challenges compared to tropical shallow-water coastal habitats such as low temperatures [26,27,28], intense pressure [26, 27, 29], and in some environments, limited oxygen availability . These environments also have unique trophic structures compared with the photic zone where photosynthesis powers most primary production [26, 30]. These disparate ecological niches also differ in their biogeochemical conditions, particularly in the concentration of reduced sulfur compounds and other nutrients critical to chemosynthetic symbiosis . However, we have scarce information on the diversity and metabolic capabilities of the sulfur-oxidizing symbionts of lucinids from deep-water habitats.
Herein we used high-throughput metagenomic sequencing to study the diversity and metabolic capabilities of symbionts associated with lucinids from a diverse range of deep-water environments around the world (Fig. 1). We considered depths greater than 200 m as deep water according to the definitions used by Cosel and Bouchet  and Glover and Taylor . Our objectives were: (1) explore the phylogenetic relationships among shallow and deep-water symbiont taxa to investigate how the diversification of lucinids across a range of environments has shaped symbiont choice; (2) compare the metabolic capabilities of symbionts from deep versus shallow-water environments to understand how different environments have shaped the lucinid symbioses; (3) infer evidence for adaptive evolution in symbiont genomes by estimating the non-synonymous to synonymous substitution ratio of protein-coding genes.
Our findings reveal the presence of multiple previously undescribed Ca. Thiodiazotropha species found only in lucinids from habitats in deeper waters and/or higher latitudes. A single Ca. Thiodiazotropha species, Ca. T. gloverae, was found in a wide range of both deep sea and temperate shallow-water locales. Additionally, we report that four deep-water lucinid species, two of which inhabit sites where reduced compounds originate from geothermal sources, have switched from associating with symbionts from the Ca. Thiodiazotropha genus to associations with a distinct group of sulfur-oxidizing Gammaproteobacteria closely related to the symbionts of hydrothermal vent gastropods. These symbiont species share large portions of their core metabolic functions but vary in nitrogen metabolism, e.g., nitrogen fixation is absent in nearly all symbionts from deep and temperate waters. This study provides new insights into the diversity and biogeography of the lucinid symbionts and highlights how their metabolic capabilities and the flexibility of lucinid symbiosis has shaped the radiation of this species-rich bivalve family across a myriad of environments in the ocean.
Lucinoma aequizonata  specimens were collected from anoxic sediments in the Santa Barbara Basin, off the coast of California, USA (2019) during an expedition FK181005 on the RV Falkor. Clams were collected using the remotely operated vehicle SUBastian with an attached sifter to remove sediments. Gills were dissected upon arrival at the water’s surface and stored in RNAlater (Cat. No. AM7020; Life Technologies, USA) and stored at 4 °C overnight and then frozen at −20 °C until extraction.
Gill tissue fragments were removed using sterile scalpels and forceps from samples obtained from the collections of the Natural History Museum (NHM) London, UK, the Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle (MNHN), Paris, France, the Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA, and the Göteborgs Naturhistoriska Museum, Sweden (GNM). All museum collection samples had been preserved in 90–100% ethanol and stored at 13–25 °C.
DNA extraction and library preparation for metagenome and amplicon sequencing
DNA was extracted from the gill tissues of Bathyaustriella thionipta  n = 5, Cardiolucina cf. quadrata  n = 2, Codakia rugifera  n = 1, Dulcina madagascarenis  n = 3, Epidulcina cf. delphinae  n = 1, Gloverina vestifex  n = 1, L. aequizonata  n = 7, Lucinoma annulata  n = 1, Lucinoma atalantae  n = 1, Lucinoma borealis  n = 6, Lucinoma capensis  n = 3, Lucinoma kastoroae  n = 2, Lucinoma myriamae  n = 3, Monitilora ramsayi  n = 2, Myrtea sp.  n = 1, Myrtea spinifera  n = 1, Notomyrtea botanica  n = 1, Rostrilucina garuda  n = 1, Semelilucina semeliformis  n = 1, Taylorina solomonensis  n = 1, Troendleina suluensis  n = 1, and Ustalucina ferruginea  n = 1. Habitat information such as depth were recorded when available and are found in supplementary Table S1.
Approximately 1 cm2 gill pieces were cut into 2 mm fragments and DNA was extracted using the Qiagen DNeasy Blood and Tissue kit (Cat. No. 69506; Qiagen, USA) or the animal tissue protocol from the Analytik Jena Innuprep DNA Mini Kit (Cat. No. 845-KS-1041250, Germany), following the manufacturers’ instructions with the following modifications: (1) Tissues were incubated in the lysis buffer solution provided in each kit until completely digested (2–20 h); (2) DNA was eluted in 50 µl of ultrapure water (Ref. 10977-015; Invitrogen, Life Technologies, USA). The extracted DNA was quantified using the Qubit dsDNA High Sensitivity Assay kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) and stored at −20 °C.
Sequencing library preparation, metagenomic and amplicon sequencing were carried out by the Joint Microbiome Facility of the Medical University of Vienna and the University of Vienna. Libraries were constructed using Illumina compatible library prep kits (NEBNext Ultra II FS DNA Library Prep Kit, NEBNext Ultra DNA v2 Library Prep Kit, Nextera Mate Pair Sample Preparation Kit). All libraries were sequenced with Illumina technology (HiSeq 3000, HiSeq 4000, and NovaSeq 6000) using paired-end settings with read-lengths of 100 bp, 150 bp, or 250 bp to generate a minimum of 1,000,000 reads (see Tables S1 and S2 for more details).
Amplicon sequencing was performed on DNA from B. thionipta n = 5, L. myriamae n = 3, and T. solomonensis n = 1 to profile the bacterial communities in the gills of these species. The V4 regions of the 16S rRNA gene were amplified using the 515F and 806R primers [39, 40]. Library preparation, sequencing and downstream processing were carried out as described by Pjevac et al. . ASV sequences were classified using DADA2 and the SILVA database SSU Ref NR 99 release 138.1 [42, 43] using a confidence threshold of 0.5. Samples that produced libraries of fewer than 1000 reads were sequenced a second time and only libraries larger than 500 reads were kept for the final analysis. Samples were visualized using the ampvis2 R package .
Quality filtering, assembly, and bacterial genome binning
Read libraries were trimmed, PhiX contamination filtered, and quality checked using BBMap v37.61’s BBDUK  feature and the software’s adapter and PhiX databases to detect contaminants. All reads below an average q-score of 15 and a minimum length of 100 bp for 150 bp and 250 bp reads or 50 bp for 100 bp reads were removed. The minimum kmer size of 21 was used for trimming and reads matching the contaminants or below the quality score were filtered out. Libraries were interleaved as needed for future processing and analysis.
Individual read libraries were assembled using SPAdes v3.13.1 [46, 47] with the “metagenome” setting and iterative kmers of 21, 31, 41, 51, 61, 71, 81, and 91. All contigs shorter than 1000 bp were removed from the assembly prior to mapping and binning. Libraries from the same host and location (maximum of three, treated as biological replicates) were used for binning when possible. If three libraries from the same host and location were not available at the time of binning, binning was attempted with libraries from similar hosts or broad scale geographical areas. Read libraries were mapped to the scaffold assemblies using BBMap with default settings. The resulting sam files were converted to bam files with samtools v1.9  and sorted using the anvi-init-bam script from Anvi’o . The assembled scaffolds were then binned using a combination of Anvi’o v6.1 or 7.1 using CONCOCT v1.1.0 , with a minimum length of 1000 bp, and metaBAT v2.15 , with a minimum length of 1500 bp. A metaBAT binning attempt with no coverage information was also attempted outside of Anvi’o. All potential bins for each metagenome were then compared using dRep v2.4.2’s  dereplicate workflow with default settings and the “best” was selected automatically. If no bin was selected, a manual bin selection (using CheckM v1.1.3  with Gammaproteobacteria gene set) and revision of the best Metagenome-Assembled Genome (MAG) using Anvi’o’s ‘anvi-refine’ was attempted to manually improve the quality of the MAGs. The bins were then checked for completion using CheckM’s taxonomy specific workflow using the previously mentioned gene set. MAGs that were more than 90% complete and 5% or less contaminated according to the gammaproteobacterial gene set in CheckM were used in further downstream analysis without further refinement. MAGs that failed the aforementioned quality thresholds (<90% complete and >5% contaminated) were manually refined using ‘anvi-refine’. MAGs that were 90% or more complete and less than 10% contaminated post-refinement, were deemed high-quality MAGs and kept for further analysis. Scripts for this workflow can be found in the supplementary material from Osvatic et al. .
All MAGs were taxonomically classified using GTDB v0.3.3 [54,55,56], and only the MAGs belonging to the Sedimenticolaceae, Chromatiaceae, and Thiohalomonadales were used for phylogenetic analyses. Publically available MAGs of previously described lucinid symbionts (Ca. Thiodiazotropha sp. and Ca. Sedimenticola sp.), alongside the MAGs of close relatives to Ca. Thiodiazotropha; Ca. Endoriftia persephone, Sedimenticola selenatireducans, S. thiotaurini, and Allochromatium vinosum, which was used as an outgroup for Ca. Thiodiazotropha MAGs, were downloaded from the NCBI database and included in the analysis (NCBI accession numbers in Table S4). MAGs related to Thiohalomonadales were also downloaded from NCBI (accession numbers contained within figures). All publicly available MAGs we used were quality checked using CheckM’s taxonomy specific workflow using the gammaproteobacterial set of marker genes.
All available MAGs, irrespective of CheckM’s estimated completion, were used to generate a concatenated multi-gene amino acid sequence alignment. Ca. Thiodiazotropha-associated genomes were run separately from Thiohalomonadales-related genomes to generate two phylogenies. The GTDB-Tk (Genome Taxonomy Database Toolkit, release 95) classify workflow was used to identify, align, and concatenate 120 highly conserved bacterial marker genes [57,58,59,60,61,62]. The concatenated amino acid sequence alignment generated from the GTDB-Tk workflow was submitted to the W-IQ-TREE server  using the default settings (auto substitution model detection, 1000 ultrafast bootstraps, and 1000 replicates of SH-aLRT branch tests). The final consensus tree of Ca. Thiodiazotropha was visualized and rooted with A. vinosum using Interactive Tree Of Life (iTOL) v5 . The final consensus tree of the Thiohalomonadales phylogeny was visualized and rooted with Chromatiales bacterium GCA002007425 using Interactive Tree Of Life (iTOL) v5 . The resulting phylogenetic trees were used alongside ANI analyses to identify species-level clades.
The average nucleotide identity (ANI) between MAGs was calculated using FastANI v1.3  and gANI . With FastANI, a program-suggested species cut-off of 95% one-way ANI was used. When FastANI values were near the 95% threshold, gANI was used as additional support. The gANI value was only used in select cases to confirm FastANI species groups. To do so, Prodigal v2.6.3  was used to generate nucleotide sequences for all genes within individual MAGs, which were subsequently used within gANI to ANI values. The program-suggested cut-offs of 96.5% ANI and .6 alignment fraction in gANI were used for species delineation. These values were used to group MAGs into species groups and delineate closely related species. Species of interest were also assessed by the percentage of conserved proteins (POCP) method .
MAG functional annotation
Open reading frames (ORF) in the symbiont MAGs were predicted using Prodigal v2.6.3 . The protein-coding gene models were functionally annotated using eggNOG-mapper v2 with the eggNOG reference database v5.0 [67, 68]. All MAGs were also submitted to the RAST (Rapid Annotation using Subsystem Technology; https://rast.nmpdr.org/) web server for functional annotation using the default RASTtk pipeline . Both sets of function annotations were manually curated for metabolic analysis and comparison. To search for missing genes of interest, ORFs were predicted for the initial raw metagenomic assemblies and the gene models were subsequently annotated using eggNOG. Word searches of the annotation tables were used to look for the presence of putatively missing genes. If a match was found, the target gene was then searched against the NCBI nr database using blastp . If the best hits for the target genes shared the same taxonomic classification as the original MAG, this was used as evidence indicating that the target genes were present but have been excluded from the MAG during the binning process. As an additional layer of evidence to confirm the presence of missing target genes, orthologs of the missing target gene, obtained from the MAGs of a closely related species, were used as references for metagenomic read mapping using BBMap to calculate coverage rates (minimum identity threshold set to 90%).
Estimating the strength of selection
To estimate the strength of selection, the non-synonymous to synonymous substitution rate ratio (dN/dS) in putative protein-coding genes was calculated for the high-quality MAGs of at least five individuals each for the following symbiont species: Candidatus T. endolucinida (n = 9), Ca. T. lotti (n = 10), Ca. T. weberae (n = 9), Ca. T. taylori (n = 10), Ca. T. “Aeq1” (n = 7), Ca. T. gloverae (n = 9), and the Thiohalomonadales symbionts of B. thionipta (Thiohalo2, n = 5). Substitution rates were calculated using ‘codeml’ in PAML v4.10.3 . To ensure that our results could be accurately compared across different clades, a subset of 1000 putatively protein-coding genes (i.e., eggNOG annotations) were randomly selected to infer dN/dS ratios. Ratios of >1 indicate positive selection, whereas ratios around zero indicate neutrality. When considering values <1, lower values are a sign of strong purifying selection, while higher values are a sign of higher genetic drift and more relaxed selection . The differences in dN/dS ratios between each symbiont species group were statistically tested using a non-paired, two-sample Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test in R v3.6.2. All scripts used for the selection analysis can be found on FigShare .
Fluorescence in-situ hybridization
To visualize the gill endosymbionts of L. myriamae and B. thionipta, we carried out catalyzed reporter deposition fluorescence in-situ hybridization (CARD-FISH) using a Thiohalomonadales-specific probe with Cy3-labeled tyramides (Thiohalo845: 5′-TTAGCTTCGACACTAAGTCCT-3′).
Gill samples originally preserved and stored in >90% ethanol were embedded in paraffin wax by the Histopathology Facility at Vienna BioCenter Core Facilities, Austria. The paraffin-embedded tissues were cut into 5-µm sections with a Leica RM2235 Manual Rotary Microtome (Leica, Germany), and mounted on SuperfrostPlus adhesion slides (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). The sections were dewaxed in Roti-Histol (Carl Roth, Germany) three times for 10 min each, followed by two washes each in 99.9%, 96%, and 90% ethanol, and finally three washes in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) for five minutes before the slides were air dried.
The tissue sections were permeabilized in 0.2% HCl for 10 min and then washed PBS for 5 minutes and rinsed in sterile water. The sections were incubated in approximately 50 µl of lysozyme solution (10 mg/mL, TRIS-EDTA buffer) for 30 min at 28–30 °C, then washed in PBS and air dried for 5 min. Inactivation was performed by incubating slides in 0.1% H2O2 for 2 min, and followed by three washes in PBS. Hybridization was performed with 1 µl of 5 pmol/µl CARD-FISH probes (1×) in 299 µL hybridization buffer (HB, varying percentages of formamide; approximately 50 µl per section) for formamide series and binding assessments (Fig. S1). 30% Formamide was chosen as an optimal percentage. Specificity tests were performed using 30% formamide HB on a L. myriamae gill (Thiohalomonadales-containing, sample L130) and Loripes orbiculatus (Ca. Thiodiazotropha-containing, from Piran, Slovenia, not on sample list) to confirm that the probe did not bind to Ca. Thiodiazotropha rRNA (Fig. S2). Hybridization was finally performed with 1 µl of 5 pmol/µl CARD-FISH probes (1×) in 299 µL hybridization buffer (HB, 30% formamide; approximately 50 µl per section, Table S3). A nonsense-Eubacteria CARD-FISH probe was also used with each sample set to check for unspecific binding and autofluorescence (Fig. S1, Amann et al. ). The slides were incubated in humid chambers (50 ml tube containing paper wet with 1 mL of HB) at 46 °C for 3–4 h. The slides were subsequently washed twice in PBS followed by a 10 min incubation in PBS at 48 °C, before they were dried with compressed air. Signal amplification was performed using an amplification buffer (AB) containing 10 µL diluted H2O2 and 2 µL of a Cy3-labeled tyramide. Approximately 50 µL of AB was added to each section and incubated for 45 min in the dark at 46 °C. The slides were then washed twice in PBS and incubated in PBS for 10 min, followed by a brief wash in 50 mL 96% ethanol and air dried. Following CARD-FISH, the samples were DAPI-stained (1 µg/mL) and mounted in Citifluor antifade mounting media (Electron Microscopy Sciences, USA). All post-amplification steps were carried out in the dark. Images were captured on a Leica TCS SP8 X confocal laser scanning microscope using a 63× objective or a Leica DMi8 inverted microscope using a 20× objective.
Deep-water lucinids host diverse symbiont lineages that are not found in shallow-water tropical clams
We sequenced, assembled, and binned metagenomes of 46 lucinid specimens representing 22 different host species from five subfamilies (24 Codakiinae, five Leucosphaerinae, nine Lucininae, two Monitilorinae, and six Myrteinae, Table S1). We retrieved 48 bacterial metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs), 43 of which were deemed “high quality” because they were over 90% complete and had below 10% contamination (Table S4). Samples L181 (B. thionipta) and 3502H (Epidulcina cf. delphinae) were the only metagenomes that each yielded two high-quality MAGs (Table S4). All 48 MAGs were Gammaproteobacteria, 38 of which were assigned to the order Chromatiales and family Sedimenticolaceae, which contains all previously described lucinid symbiont species. The remaining ten MAGs were assigned to the order Thiohalomonadales and the SZUA-152 family, hereafter referred to as Thiohalomonadales (GTDB release 95, Table S4).
Phylogenomic analyses indicated that the symbiont MAGs represented 18 distinct bacterial species clades (13 Ca. Thiodiazotropha, one unclassified Sedimenticolaceae and four Thiohalomonadales), based on a 95% average nucleotide identity (ANI) threshold for species delimitation (Fig. 2 and Dataset S1–4). Twelve of the 13 Ca. Thiodiazotropha species clades comprised previously undescribed symbionts while a single MAG retrieved from a Cardiolucina cf. quadrata specimen (L029) was identified as Ca. T. endolucinida, a species previously known from shallow-water Caribbean lucinid hosts (Fig. 2, Tables S1 and S4, and Dataset S1). Nine of the 13 Ca. Thiodiazotropha species clades were symbionts harbored by lucinid species from deep-water habitats (>200 m, Fig. 2). Three symbiont species (“Myrt1”, “Lucinoma1”, and Ca. T. gloverae), all containing deep-water representatives, were associated with host species from multiple lucinid subfamilies (Fig. 2). Ca. T. gloverae, the most widespread and prevalent of the three species, was associated with L. annulata, L. borealis, and L. capensis (East Pacific, North and South Atlantic, respectively), and Cardiolucina cf. quadrata and T. suluensis from the Philippines Sea (Fig. 2). We proposed the name Candidatus Thiodiazotropha gloverae for this species after Emily Glover to honor her important contributions to understanding the biodiversity and evolution of the Lucinidae. Although one of MAGs retrieved from B. thionipta specimen L181 was assigned to the Sedimenticolaceae, this MAG was excluded from subsequent analyses because it was distantly related to the Sedimenticola and Ca. Thiodiazotropha genera, and present in only one of the five B. thionipta specimens (Fig. 2, Table S4, Supplementary Discussion). Finally, each of the four Thiohalomonadales symbiont species was associated with a distinct lucinid host species: B. thionipta, T. solomonensis, L. atalantae, and L. myriamae, from three lucinid subfamilies (Lucininae, Myrteinae, Codakiinae, and Codakiinae, respectively) (Fig. 3, Dataset S2–4). These Thiohalomonadales symbionts formed a clade with the “γ−1” symbiont of Alviniconcha sp.  and an unnamed symbiont (referred to as “Giga1”, GCF_016097415) of Gigantopelta aegis , both of which are hydrothermal vent gastropods (Fig. 3, Dataset S2–4). Analyses of the percentage of conserved proteins (POCP) and average amino acid identity, 42–50% and above 66%, respectively, both suggest this clade of bivalve and gastropod symbionts represented a single genus (Dataset S5) .
Several deep-water lucinid species harbor sulfur-oxidizing bacteria from the order Thiohalomondales as intracellular symbionts
To better understand the bacterial communities associated with the four lucinid species from which Thiohalomonadales MAGs could be assembled (with one exception), we performed high-throughput sequencing of 16S rRNA amplicons with the eight individuals available. The results mirrored those from the metagenomes. The most dominant amplicon sequence variant (ASV) in each of these libraries was identical to the sequence found in the Thiohalomonadales MAGs from the corresponding specimen. In contrast to the metagenomic assignment to Thiohalomonadales based on GTDB, the 16S rRNA-gene amplicons were classified as “Thiomicrospiraceae endosymbionts” through the SILVA database. Considering GTDB’s more robust genomic database, we use this classification throughout. A maximum of two Thiohalomonadales ASVs were found per sample. The dominant ASV made up to 91.5% of the reads in all samples while the secondary Thiohalomonadales ASV comprised at most 8.1% (Fig. 3, Dataset S6). CARD-FISH with probes specific to the Thiohalomonadales bacteria on L. myriamae and B. thionipta gill sections, as well as previously published SEM micrographs of B. thionipta (additional SEM micrographs can also be found in Fig. S4), further indicate that bacterial endosymbionts are harbored internally within bacteriocytes in the gills (Fig. 3C) . Finally, two ASVs were assigned to the SUP05 lineage of chemosynthetic sulfur-oxidizing bacteria typically associated with bathymodiolin mussels, but these were only present in low numbers: 4.4% and 3.7% of B. thionipta samples L179 and L181, respectively, and below 0.2% in samples L130 (L. myriamae) and L183 (B. thionipta) (Fig. 3, Dataset S6).
Lucinid symbionts from diverse environments and phylogenetic lineages share the same core metabolic capabilities
Although there were minor differences within the pathways common to all the symbiont species, such as the presence/absence of different variants of the sulfide:quinone reductase (SQR) or ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (RuBisCO) proteins, symbionts from both the Sedimenticolaceae and Thiohalomonadales appeared to share the same core metabolic capabilities for oxidizing sulfur and fixing carbon that are fundamental to chemosynthetic symbiosis of the lucinid clams (Fig. S5). The symbionts’ ability to oxidize reduced sulfur compounds appears to be the basis for energy conservation in all so-far investigated lucinid symbioses. All Sedimenticolaceae and Thiohalomonadales symbiont MAGs encoded several pathways for sulfur oxidation, including at least two types of SQR and flavocytochrome-c-sulfide dehydrogenase (FCC) genes for oxidizing hydrogen sulfide to elemental sulfur, the truncated Sox system (soxABYZ genes), and the reverse dissimilatory-sulfate reduction (rDSR) pathway (Fig. S5, Tables S5, S6–7). The energy generated from sulfur oxidation is used to fix inorganic carbon through the Calvin–Benson–Bassham (CBB) cycle. All Ca. Thiodiazotropha symbionts MAGs encoded genes for either form I, II, or both of the RuBisCO enzymes (Tables S5–S8). In contrast, the Thiohalomonadales endosymbionts associated with lucinids, Alviniconcha spp. and Gigantopelta aegis possessed only RuBisCO form II, except the symbiont of T. solomonensis (“Thiohalo1”), which had an additional RuBisCO form I gene. In addition to these chemosynthesis pathways, all lucinid symbionts had the genomic potential for heterotrophic use of organic compounds, assimilating ammonia, storing phosphorous as polyphosphate, and respiring oxygen through cbb3-type cytochrome c oxidases (Fig. S5, Tables 1, S5–S7).
Nitrogen fixation capability is associated with shallow water
The ability to fix nitrogen through the nif genes is a hallmark trait of all previously described Ca. Thiodiazotropha symbionts associated with lucinids from seagrass and coral reef environments (Fig. 2, Tables 1, S6, and S7, Osvatic et al. ). Yet, none of the Ca. Thiodiazotropha symbionts of clams from locations deeper than 50 m had the core functional genes for nitrogen fixation (Table 1, Fig. 2, Tables S6–8). Furthermore, although all shallow-water representatives of Ca. T. endolucinida possessed the entire complement of nif genes , the Ca. T. endolucinida MAG associated with the Cardiolucina cf. quadrata specimen (sample L029), from deep-sea sediments (230–288 m) off Madagascar, only possessed nifJ and nifZ (Table S1). Metagenomic reads from this sample did not map to any of the other Ca. T endolucinida nifABEHMNQWZ genes (GCA001715975), further suggesting that this deep-water Ca. T. endolucinida strain has lost the ability to fix nitrogen (Tables S6, S9, and S10). In particular, the gene annotated as nifJ, in particular, may not only be involved in nitrogen fixation as KEGG pathway reconstruction classified this gene as a pyruvate-ferredoxin/flavodoxin oxidoreductase (E.C 126.96.36.199) involved in central carbon metabolism and did not assign this gene to the nitrogen fixation pathway. These findings indicate that multiple lineages in the Ca. Thiodiazotropha genus lack the ability to fix nitrogen and the presence or absence of this ability is correlated with environmental factors, more specifically, its absence is associated with living in a deep-sea habitat. Similarly, nearly all members of the symbiotic Thiohalomonadales clade never possessed more than two components of the nif operon, and if they did it was primarily nifJ, indicating that the endosymbionts of deep-water lucinids and hydrothermal vent gastropods were unable to fix nitrogen. The sole exception was the “Thiohalo2” species clade associated with B. thionipta, which had a complete nif operon apart from nifF (Tables 1, S6, and S7). In particular, the “Thiohalo2” nifBDEKM genes, in particular, shared high amino acid sequence identity with their Ca. Thiodiazotropha orthologs. Although the “Thiohalo2” nifH shared highest identity with an unannotated gene from a member of the Zetaproteobacteria (92%), it nevertheless shared 90.7% pairwise amino acid sequence identity with Ca. Thiodiazotropha nifH genes (Dataset S7 and Fig. S7).
All previously described lucinid symbionts have the potential for utilizing alternative nitrogen sources. Apart from the symbionts of L. aequizonata (“Aeq1”), all Thiohalomondales and Ca. Thiodiazotropha symbionts possessed a periplasmic nitrate reductase for dissimilatory nitrate reduction and a nitrite reductase NADPH subunit for assimilatory nitrate reduction (Tables 1, S6, and S7). Most symbiont MAGs also encoded the complete denitrification pathway for reducing nitrate to N2, with the exceptions of Ca. T. weberae and Ca. T. taylori, which lacked copper-containing nitrite reductase, and “Ctena2”, which was lacking nitric oxide reductase (Tables 1, S6, and S7). The “Aeq1” symbiont was particularly noteworthy in being the only symbiont to have lost all denitrification genes except the respiratory nitrate reductase (Tables 1, S6, and S7). Osvatic et al.  previously reported that Ca. T. taylori, Ca. T. weberae, Ca. T. “RUGA”, Ca. T. lotti had the potential for using urea, but genes for the urease and allophanate pathways were absent from the MAGs of all the symbionts described here (Tables 1, S6, and S7). Several symbiont species did however have genes for exploiting other nitrogen sources such as cyanate; the MAGs of Ca. T. endolucinida, Ca. T. gloverae, “CTENA1-4”, “Ustal1”, “Leuco2”, and “Lucinoma1”, from shallow and deep-water environments, encoded a gene for the cyanate hydratase enzyme, which converts cyanate into carbon dioxide and ammonia.
The methylotrophy pathway, which enables growth on single carbon compounds, (genes pqqBCDE, mxaF, exaA, exaB, and the one-carbon transfer pathway utilizing methanofuran) was previously found in multiple shallow-water Ca. Thiodiazotropha species (Tables S6 and S7) . Most of these genes were present in the deep-water Ca. T. endolucinida MAG (Cardiolucina cf. quadrata symbiont) and in the majority of “Lucinoma1” and Ca. T. gloverae MAGs, as well as in “Rugifera1”, a C. rugifera symbiont closely related to “Lucinoma1” (Tables 1, S5–S7). In contrast, none of the Thiohalomonadales symbionts in this study or described previously (Alviniconcha spp. and Gigantopelta aegis symbionts) had the capacity for methylotrophy (Tables S5 and S7).
The symbionts of lucinids from extreme environments are under strong purifying selection
The median dN/dS ratio (omega) values for the symbionts of L. aequizonata and B. thionipta (Ca. T. “Aeq1” and Thiohalo2, respectively) were the lowest of all the symbiont species analyzed (both 0.002, Two-sample Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test, p < 0.001, Fig. 4, Table S11). The median omega values of Ca. T. taylori and Ca. T. weberae were 0.048 to 0.072, respectively, while the median omega values of Ca. T. endolucinida, Ca. T. gloverae, and Ca. T. lotti were the highest and ranged from 0.091 to 0.123 (Fig. 4, Table S11). There was no significant difference in the media omega values of the latter three symbiont species, but they were significantly higher than all other symbiont species tested (Table S11). There was also no significant difference in the median omega values between Ca. T. taylori and Ca. T. weberae. Therefore, Ca. T. “Aeq1” and Thiohalo2, two symbiont species originating from oxygen-minimum zone and hydrothermal vent habitats, respectively, experienced the highest levels of purifying selection of all the symbiont clades analyzed (Fig. 4, Table S11). We did not observe any trends indicating a correlation between habitat depth and strength of selection. For example, Ca. T. weberae and Ca. T. taylori, both of which inhabit shallow-water environments, had significantly different omega values, while Ca. T. gloverae and Ca. T. lotti had similar dN/dS ratios despite their very distinct geographic and depth distribution patterns (Fig. 4, Table S11). Finally, the median omega values of endemic symbionts (Ca. T. weberae, Ca. T. lotti; 0.067) were not significantly different from cosmopolitan symbionts (Ca. T. gloverae, Ca. T. taylori; 0.075, p > 0.05, W = 523,558).
Lucinids from vastly different environments associate with symbionts from the genus Ca. Thiodiazotropha
Lucinid clams have radiated across diverse habitats in Earth’s oceans, from the intertidal zone to hydrothermal vents in the deep sea. So far, our understanding of the lucinid symbiosis stemmed largely from a limited variety of shallow-water species, thus, little was known about the role their characteristic symbiosis played in colonizing harsh, deep-sea environments. Here, we sequenced the gill metagenomes of 22 lucinid species from a myriad of primarily deep-water habitats across the globe (Fig. 1 and Table S1), and retrieved 48 symbiont MAGs, from which we identified twelve undescribed symbiont species from the genus Ca. Thiodiazotropa that have not been previously found in lucinids from shallow tropical environments. Some of these species (Ca. T. gloverae, Ca. T. endolucinida, and “Myrt1”) were globally distributed and had extensive water depth ranges, while others appeared limited to specific geographic locations or environments (Figs. 1, 2, Tables S1 and S4). These findings highlight the unappreciated diversity of the Ca. Thiodiazotropha genus, their widespread presence in diverse marine environments with distinct geochemical conditions, and further show that lucinids from diverse phylogenetic lineages, living in distinct habitats and conditions, all prefer associating with symbionts stemming from a single, closely related group of sulfur-oxidizing bacteria from the family Sedimenticolaceae. Even M. ramsayi, a member of the earliest-branching lucinid lineage (Monitilorinae) sampled in our study, was associated with Ca. Thiodiazotropha symbionts. This conservation of the lucinid-Ca. Thiodiazotropha association across five lucinid subfamilies of varying evolutionary age, suggests that this ancient association dates back to the last common ancestor of the Monitilorinae and other lucinids. However, there was no clear evidence of congruence between host evolutionary history and symbiont phylogeny. Diverse Ca. Thiodiazotropha species, particularly those with global distributions like Ca. T. gloverae, frequently associated with multiple divergent host lineages, which is consistent with a strategy of acquiring symbionts horizontally from the environment (Fig. 2). These findings indicate that lucinids from different habitats have access to a diverse and widely distributed pool of candidate symbionts from the Ca. Thiodiazotropha genus, and further highlights the immense capacity of these bacteria to power symbiotic chemosynthetic primary productivity under vastly different environmental conditions. Moreover, the flexibility in the lucinid symbiont pairing increases the likelihood of forming a successful association across diverse environments and is likely to be an important contributing factor underlying the evolutionary success of this chemosynthetic symbiosis.
Environmental factors such as temperature, nitrogen, and oxygen availability shape symbiont distribution and metabolic functions
Although the genetic diversity of environmental symbiont populations has never been thoroughly investigated, presumably, the environment has a significant impact on symbiont distribution and genomic potential, influencing which symbiont types are available to the lucinids in a particular habitat. Hence, it has been suggested that hosts acquire symbiont genotypes adapted to the local environment . The selection of locally adapted symbionts could explain why half of the 12 Ca. Thiodiazotropha species described here appear to have limited geographic ranges (Fig. 2), but these distribution patterns could also be biased by limitations in sampling effort. Furthermore, the recent discovery of symbiont species associated with lucinids from distant geographic locations around the world challenges this paradigm . Ca. T. gloverae, for example, was associated with lucinid species from across the Philippines Sea, Pacific Ocean, North Sea, and Atlantic Ocean (Fig. 2, Tables S1 and S4). Though this cosmopolitan distribution is not unprecedented (see ), Ca. T. gloverae also occurred in a wide range of habitats, from sediments at 740 m depth close to the equator, to intertidal seagrass meadows in Northern Europe (Fig. 2, Tables S1 and S4). It is therefore intriguing that Ca. T. gloverae does not co-occur with Ca. T. taylori, another globally distributed lucinid symbiont that only associates with lucinids from tropical shallow-water seagrass and reef environments . Although, we are unable to determine the precise factors driving these distribution patterns without direct empirical measurements of local environmental conditions, it is interesting to speculate that the non-overlapping ranges of the globally distributed Ca. T. gloverae and Ca. T. taylori could be driven by their adaptation to distinct temperature regimes that vary with depth and latitude. Future studies should thus take into temperature as a potential factor shaping the environmental pool of Ca. Thiodiazotropha genotypes available as potential candidates for the lucinid symbiosis.
We also observed that nearly all Ca. Thiodiazotropha symbionts of clams from cooler temperate or deeper waters around the world were missing the nif gene cluster encoding the nitrogen fixation pathway, a metabolic feature that is ubiquitous in their shallow-water tropical relatives. This corroborates the previous unsuccessful attempts to amplify the nifH gene in samples of Epidulcina cf. delphinae and L. borealis [13, 76]. Even the deep-water (250 m) Ca. T. endolucinida strain associated with Cardiolucina cf. quadrata (Madagascar) lacked a nifH or any of the functionally important nif genes that were detected in genomes from the same symbiont species from the Caribbean [12, 19] (Fig. 2 and Tables S5–7). However, all lucinid symbionts described thus far have the ability to assimilate ammonium and some also possessed an assimilatory nitrate reductase, which are more economical strategies to acquire nitrogen than energetically expensive nitrogen fixation [77,78,79,80,81]. It is also worth mentioning that although periplasmic nitrate reductase is not typically associated with nitrate assimilation, Sanders et al. previously proposed an alternative mechanism by which ammonia produced through periplasmic nitrate reduction and subsequent cytoplasmic nitrite reduction could potentially be exploited for biosynthesis . There are no measurements of inorganic nitrogen concentrations directly in the environments sampled for this study, but nitrate levels can reach 40 μM and ammonium can reach millimolar concentrations in deep ocean waters [77,78,79,80,81], while these are typically below 10 μM in tropical seagrass beds and 180 μM in coral reefs, both oligotrophic and nitrogen-limited [19, 83,84,85]. Furthermore, many of the lucinids in the present study occurred in continental shelf or temperate coastal environments that typically receive significant seasonal influxes of organic matter from either upwelling processes or terrestrial runoff, which can result in elevated levels of nitrate and ammonium in the water column and sediments [86, 87]. Hence the absence of nitrogen fixation in the symbionts of lucinids from temperate shallow-water and deep-water environments suggest either a sufficient supply of inorganic nitrogen in the environments or that these hosts to rely more heavily on heterotrophic filter-feeding to meet the metabolic nitrogen requirements of the symbiosis. The reliance on heterotrophic filter-feeding versus inorganic nitrogen is likely to depend on local conditions. For example, Lucinoma from oxygen-minimum zones (OMZs) are likely to inhabit organic matter-rich sediments that are low in ammonium [88,89,90], while the mid-oceanic ridge hydrothermal vent environments inhabited by B. thionipta are typically replete with nitrate but limited in ammonium and organic matter [82, 91]. These lines of evidence lead us to conclude that the nitrogen budget of the ecosystem is an important factor influencing the metabolic functions of the lucinid symbiosis.
Meeting the oxygen demand of their symbionts’ chemoautotrophic metabolism can be a flux-limiting physiological challenge under hypoxic or anoxic conditions (reviewed by Childress and Girguis, 2011 ). However, two of the lucinid species in the present study, L. aequizonata and L. capensis, have evolved to live in the low oxygen conditions in the oxygen-minimum zone (OMZ) sediments off the Californian and Namibian coasts. L. aequizonata and L. capensis are associated with two distinct but closely related symbiont species, the “Aeq1” symbiont clade and the globally widespread Ca. T. gloverae, respectively (ANI > 91%; Dataset S1). Despite their close phylogenetic relationship, the “Aeq1” MAGs were characterized by several highly derived traits: (1) the “Aeq1” MAGs have undergone genome streamlining and are substantially smaller (ranging from 2.9–3.2 megabases) than all other hiqh-quality Ca. Thiodiazotropha MAGs (average 4.63 megabases) (Table S4); (2) Consistent with their reduced genome size, “Aeq1” has lost key biological and metabolic capabilities, such as flagellar biogenesis, and enzymes involved in multiple nitrogen metabolic processes, including assimilatory nitrate and nitrite reduction and denitrification (Nir, Nor, Nos), all of which are present in the Ca. T. gloverae MAGs (Fig. S7, Tables S5 and S7). However, conservation of the respiratory nitrate reductase gene indicates that the “Aeq1” symbionts can use nitrate as a terminal electron acceptor instead of oxygen. These genomic data are consistent with previous physiological experiments indicating that the L. aequizonata symbionts reduce nitrate to nitrite but no further [8, 93, 94]. Interestingly, Ca. T. gloverae, the L. capensis symbiont, also has the ability to respire nitrate and it was recently shown that L. capensis has a three-fold higher nitrate consumption rate compared to other mollusc species that co-occur in the Namibian OMZ  (Table 1). Partnership with symbionts that respire nitrate could provide the lucinid symbiosis an important evolutionary advantage in an OMZ environment, as it prevents competition between the symbiotic partners for the scant amounts of oxygen that might be available.
Rare cases of symbiont switching to the Thiohalomonadales correspond to major habitat changes
Nearly all members of the Lucinidae, including the species from the diverse habitats and phylogenetic lineages investigated in the present study, have specifically established symbiosis with selected symbionts from only a single group of bacteria – the family Sedimenticolaceae. We nevertheless discovered four deep-sea (315–2130 m) lucinids from divergent subfamilies and distant geographic locations that were exceptions to this rule: T. solomonensis (Myrteinae), B. thionipta (Lucininae), L. atalantae, and L. myriamae (Codakiinae), which have all independently acquired closely related symbionts from the order Thiohalomonadales (Fig. 3 and Table S4). Both 16S rRNAgene and phylogenomic analyses indicate these Thiohalomonadales symbionts are closely related to the sulfur-oxidizing (SOX) symbionts of diverse animals that inhabit hydrothermal vents environments, including the bivalve Maorithyas hadalis (Thyasiridae) and the gastropods Alviniconcha spp. (Provannidae; “γ−1” symbiont), and Gigantopelta aegis (Peltospiridae) [2, 74, 96]. Only one of the four lucinids associated with Thiohalomonadales symbionts, B. thionipta, was from hydrothermal vent sediments , while L. myriamae inhabits a cold-seep environment and we have no habitat data for the other two species . The paucity of environmental data stemming from these deep-sea lucinid habitats makes it impractical to determine the drivers underlying these symbiont switching events, but lab experiments on hydrothermal vent snails associated with the “γ−1” symbiont, which is closely related to the lucinid Thiohalomonadales symbionts, could provide us some clues. In the Lau basin, the Alviniconcha snails associate with either Campylobacteria (A. boucheti) or Gammaproteobacteria (“γ−1” symbiont of A. kojimai, A. strummeri) SOX bacteria, and it was found that the “γ−1” symbiont was better than the Campylobacteria symbiont at fixing carbon under low H2S and H2 concentrations, which suggests the “γ−1” symbiont is physiologically adapted to hydrogen- and sulfide-limited niches . We are currently unable to determine whether these lucinids have selected Thiohalomonadales symbionts because they are better adapted to low reductant concentrations in these deep-sea habitats or if it is because members of the Ca. Thiodiazotropha and associated Sedimenticolaceae were in abundances too low for lucinids to establish or maintain a viable gill symbiotic community. Although the selective drivers are unclear, it is likely that these symbiont switches have coincided with major shifts to new habitats with environmental conditions that are not typically experienced by other members of the Lucinidae. Such habitats might be characterized by more dynamic biogeochemical conditions, and the formation of steep geochemical and temperature gradients. Our findings thus highlight a need for more extensive research encompassing the diversity of lucinids across the full spectrum of their natural habitats coupled with physiological experiments and environmental measurements to determine whether acquiring a locally adapted symbiont indeed provides the lucinid host with a fitness advantage.
The genomes of symbiont species from two “extreme” habitats, “Thiohalo2” and Ca. T. “Aeq1” associated with the hydrothermal vent dwelling B. thionipta and oxygen-minimum zone dwelling L. aequizonata, respectively (Figs. 1, 4), exhibited the highest levels of purifying selection, which also correlated with relatively small genome sizes: Ca. T. “Aeq1” had a mean genome size of 3 megabases, compared to an average of 4.63 megabases across the other Ca. Thiodiazotropha species, while “Thiohalo2” had a mean genome size of 3.56 megabases (Table S4). “Thiohalo2”, however, did not have a smaller genome size than the other Thiohalomonadales. We did not observe any relationship between habitat depth and degree of selection pressure (Fig. 4). We posit that genome streamlining due to selection for more efficient use of nutrients in populations with a large effective size could explain these patterns, rather than genome reduction due to genetic drift associated with small effective population sizes, as is typical of insect endosymbionts . Whether selection acts on the free-living or symbiosis stage cannot be concluded with the data available, but given that no release of symbionts from the host to the environment has ever been observed , selective pressure during the free-living life stage seems more likely. We speculate that symbiosis with a lucinid host in harsh environmental conditions could provide a means of escaping nutrient limitation during the free-living stage.
Why is symbiont switching away from the genus Ca. Thiodiazotropha so uncommon?
The flexibility to partner up with completely different groups of sulfur-oxidizing bacteria like the Thiohalomonadales, is clearly an important strategy that allows lucinids to exploit novel niches and could be critical to survival in more extreme environments like hydrothermal vents. An additional noteworthy example of symbiont switching is the association between Ca. Sedimenticola endophacoides, the only lucinid symbiont known in this genus, and its host Phacoides pectinatus, which lives deeply burrowed in sulfide-rich intertidal mangrove mud  (Table 1), one of the more extreme and oxygen-limited shallow-water lucinid habitats. Symbiont shifts in terrestrial plants and invertebrates are typically associated with trophic shifts [99, 100], while in the marine environment, variations in symbiont carbon and nitrogen metabolic potential similarly appear to shape the nutritional symbioses between siboglinids and chemosynthetic bacteria to allow the colonization of and adaptation to different chemosynthetic environments . Although carbon and nitrogen metabolisms are variable across and even within the Thiohalomondales, Ca. Thiodiazotropha and Ca. Sedmenticola, we have not observed strong correlations between the variability in these metabolic capabilities and host habitat or geography (Table 1). Furthermore, the discovery of multiple globally distributed symbiont species shared by lucinids from diverse environments inevitably raises the question of whether lucinids derive any benefit from associating with a locally adapted endemic symbiont genotype instead of a cosmopolitan species. For example, even though nitrogen fixation is a nearly ubiquitous feature in shallow-water Ca. Thiodiazotropha, it remains unclear whether the lucinids associate almost exclusively with diazotrophs because these symbionts confer a fitness advantage in these environments or if this trait is simply ubiquitous in the pool of potential candidate symbionts living in an oligotrophic habitat, where selective pressures are exerted by nitrogen limitation. Indeed, a multitude of lucinid species clearly thrive without associating with a diazotrophic symbiont, and furthermore, the ability to filter-feed (a strategy used by lucinids and other animals with autotrophic symbionts) could potentially provide sufficient nitrogen for growth in oligotrophic environments. The reduced metabolic repertoire of the “Aeq1” clade further illustrates that relatively few fundamental metabolic pathways, most of which involve sulfur oxidation and carbon fixation, are in principle required for the functioning of the lucinid symbiosis. It is notable that in most environments, lucinid fitness does not depend on the specialized metabolic features of a locally adapted and/or endemic symbiont genotype. Non-dietary ecological factors such as thermal sensitivity can also shape symbioses, and the replacement of thermally intolerant symbionts with tolerant strains has been shown in aphids exposed to elevated temperatures in laboratory settings . Instead, we suggest that future work should investigate whether acquiring symbionts that can maintain optimal chemosynthetic productivity under the temperature regime of the local environment affects the functioning and success of the lucinid symbiosis.
Although symbiont switches have occurred multiple times in the lucinid family, losses of Ca. Thiodiazotropha symbionts are nonetheless rather uncommon. While lucinid hosts appear to freely associate with diverse Ca. Thiodiazotropha genotypes, it is possible that physiological incompatibilities constrain the formation of partnerships with more phylogenetically distant sulfur-oxidizing bacteria. A lack of shared evolutionary history can result in decreased fitness as has been demonstrated in Steinernema nematodes following switches to a closely related but non-cognate symbiont . These initial incompatibilities could potentially be ameliorated through mechanisms like carrying a greater symbiont load to compensate for the new symbiont’s weaker performance . Alternatively, our findings suggest there is likely a rich genetic pool of candidate symbionts in the environment with an extensive metabolic repertoire. These diverse metabolic capabilities likely allow the Ca. Thiodiazotropha genus to persist across a myriad of environments characterized by distinct geochemical conditions, which could be an important factor contributing to their global success and explain why symbiont switching events are a relatively rare occurrence among the lucinids.
The raw reads and MAGs have been deposited in the NCBI BioProject database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/) with links to BioProject accession numbers PRJNA744034 and PRJNA765502. The BioSample accession numbers for the MAGs are SAMN20122384-SAMN20122425 and SAMN21561986-SAMN21561989, while SAMN20119405-SAMN20119448 and SAMN21572993-SAMN21572996 belong to their corresponding raw read sets. Amplicon sequences are also found under PRJNA744034. Phylogenetic trees and corresponding alignments are available on FigShare with information accompanying corresponding figures. All other study data are included in the article and/or supporting information files.
Cavanaugh CM, McKiness ZP, Newton ILG, Stewart FJ. Marine chemosynthetic symbioses. Prokaryotes. 2006;1:475–507.
Beinart RA, Luo C, Konstantinidis KT, Stewart FJ, Girguis PR. The bacterial symbionts of closely related hydrothermal vent snails with distinct geochemical habitats show broad similarity in chemoautotrophic gene content. Front Microbiol. 2019;10:1818.
Robidart JC, Bench SR, Feldman RA, Novoradovsky A, Podell SB, Gaasterland T, et al. Metabolic versatility of the Riftia pachyptila endosymbiont revealed through metagenomics. Environ Microbiol. 2008;10:727–37.
Ponnudurai R, Sayavedra L, Kleiner M, Heiden SE, Thürmer A, Felbeck H, et al. Genome sequence of the sulfur-oxidizing Bathymodiolus thermophilus gill endosymbiont. Stand Genom Sci. 2017;12:50.
Duperron S, Bergin C, Zielinski F, Blazejak A, Pernthaler A, McKiness ZP, et al. A dual symbiosis shared by two mussel species, Bathymodiolus azoricus and Bathymodiolus puteoserpentis (Bivalvia: Mytilidae), from hydrothermal vents along the northern Mid-Atlantic Ridge. Environ Microbiol. 2006;8:1441–7.
Dubilier N, Bergin C, Lott C. Symbiotic diversity in marine animals: the art of harnessing chemosynthesis. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2008;6:725–40.
Sogin EM, Leisch N, Dubilier N. Chemosynthetic symbioses. Curr Biol. 2020;30:R1137–R1142.
Roeselers G, Newton ILG. On the evolutionary ecology of symbioses between chemosynthetic bacteria and bivalves. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2012;94:1–10.
Moran NA. Symbiosis as an adaptive process and source of phenotypic complexity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;104 Suppl 1:8627–33.
McMullen JG, Peterson BF, Forst S, Blair HG, Patricia Stock S. Fitness costs of symbiont switching using entomopathogenic nematodes as a model. BMC Evol Biol. 2017;17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12862-017-0939-6.
Taylor JD, Glover E. Biology, evolution and generic review of the chemosymbiotic bivalve family Lucinidae. London, UK: Ray Society; 2021.
Osvatic JT, Wilkins LGE, Leibrecht L, Leray M, Zauner S, Polzin J, et al. Global biogeography of chemosynthetic symbionts reveals both localized and globally distributed symbiont groups. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2021;118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2104378118.
Petersen JM, Kemper A, Gruber-Vodicka H, Cardini U, van der Geest M, Kleiner M, et al. Chemosynthetic symbionts of marine invertebrate animals are capable of nitrogen fixation. Nat Microbiol. 2016;2:16195.
Lim SJ, Davis B, Gill D, Swetenburg J, Anderson LC, Engel AS, et al. Gill microbiome structure and function in the chemosymbiotic coastal lucinid Stewartia floridana. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2021;97. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsec/fiab042.
Lim SJ, Davis BG, Gill DE, Walton J, Nachman E, Engel AS, et al. Taxonomic and functional heterogeneity of the gill microbiome in a symbiotic coastal mangrove lucinid species. ISME J. 2019;13:902–20.
Gros O, Liberge M, Felbeck H. Interspecific infection of aposymbiotic juveniles of Codakia orbicularis by various tropical lucinid gill-endosymbionts. Mar Biol. 2003;142:57–66.
Gros O, Elisabeth NH, Gustave SDD, Caro A, Dubilier N. Plasticity of symbiont acquisition throughout the life cycle of the shallow-water tropical lucinid Codakia orbiculata (Mollusca: Bivalvia). Environ Microbiol. 2012;14:1584–95.
Gros O, Frenkiel L, Mouëza M. Embryonic, larval, and post-larval development in the symbiotic clam Codakia orbicularis (Bivalvia: Lucinidae). Invertebr Biol. 1997;116:86–101.
König S, Gros O, Heiden SE, Hinzke T, Thürmer A, Poehlein A, et al. Nitrogen fixation in a chemoautotrophic lucinid symbiosis. Nat Microbiol. 2016;2:16193.
Fiore CL, Jarett JK, Olson ND, Lesser MP. Nitrogen fixation and nitrogen transformations in marine symbioses. Trends Microbiol. 2010;18:455–63.
Cardini U, Bednarz VN, Foster RA, Wild C. Benthic N2 fixation in coral reefs and the potential effects of human-induced environmental change. Ecol Evol. 2014;4:1706–27.
Glover EA, Taylor JD. Lucinidae of the Philippines: highest known diversity and ubiquity of chemosymbiotic bivalves from intertidal to bathyal depths (Mollusca: Bivalvia). mém Mus Natl Hist Nat. 2016;208:65–234.
Taylor JD, Glover EA, Williams ST. Diversification of chemosymbiotic bivalves: origins and relationships of deeper water Lucinidae. Biol J Linn Soc Lond. 2014;111:401–20.
von Cosel R. Taxonomy of tropical West African bivalves. VI. Remarks on Lucinidae (Mollusca, Bivalvia), with description of six new genera and eight new species. Zoosystema. 2006;28:805.
Glover EA, Taylor JD, Rowden AA. Bathyaustriella thionipta, a new lucinid bivalve from a hydrothermal vent on the Kermadec Ridge, New Zealand and its relationship to shallow-water taxa (Bivalvia: Lucinidae). J Mollusca Stud. 2004;70:283–95.
Paulus E Shedding light on deep-sea biodiversity—a highly vulnerable habitat in the face of anthropogenic change. Front Mar Sci. 2021;8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2021.667048.
Brown A, Thatje S. Explaining bathymetric diversity patterns in marine benthic invertebrates and demersal fishes: physiological contributions to adaptation of life at depth. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2014;89:406–26.
Smith CR, De Leo FC, Bernardino AF, Sweetman AK, Arbizu PM. Abyssal food limitation, ecosystem structure and climate change. Trends Ecol Evol. 2008;23:518–28.
Gage JD, Tyler PA. Deep-sea biology: a natural history of organisms at the deep-sea floor. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1991.
Iken K, Brey T, Wand U, Voigt J, Junghans P. Food web structure of the benthic community at the Porcupine Abyssal Plain (NE Atlantic): a stable isotope analysis. Prog Oceanogr. 2001;50:383–405.
von Cosel R, Bouchet P. Tropical deep-water lucinids (Mollusca: Bivalvia) from the Indo-Pacific: essentially unknown, but diverse and occasionally gigantic. mém Mus Natl Hist Nat. 2008;196:115–213.
Stearns REC Scientific results of explorations by the US Fish Commission steamer Albatross. No. XVII. Descriptions of new West American land, fresh-water, and marine shells, with notes and comments. Proceedings of the United States National Museum. 1890. https://repository.si.edu/bitstream/handle/10088/13174/1/USNMP-13_813_1890.pdf.
Taylor JD, Glover EA. The lucinid bivalve genus Cardiolucina (Mollusca, Bivalvia, Lucinidae): systematics, anatomy and relationships. Bull Br Mus Nat Hist Zoo. 1997;63:93–122.
Coan EV, Valentich-Scott P, Sadeghian PS. Bivalve seashells of tropical West America: marine bivalve mollusks from Baja California to Northern Peru. Santa Barbara, USA: Museum of Natural History; 2012.
von Cosel R, Gofas S. Marine bivalves of tropical West Africa: from Rio de Oro to southern Angola. Marseille, France: Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle, Paris; 2019. p 1104.
Atkinson L, Sink K. Field guide to the offshore marine invertebrates of South Africa. 2018. https://doi.org/10.15493/SAEON.PUB.10000001.
Montagu G. Testacea Britannica, or natural history of British shells. London, UK: JS Hollis; 1803.
Taylor J, Glover E. New lucinid bivalves from shallow and deeper water of the Indian and West Pacific Oceans (Mollusca, Bivalvia, Lucinidae). ZooKeys. 2013;326:69–90.
Apprill A, McNally S, Parsons R, Weber L. Minor revision to V4 region SSU rRNA 806R gene primer greatly increases detection of SAR11 bacterioplankton. Aquat Micro Ecol. 2015;75:129–37.
Parada AE, Needham DM, Fuhrman JA. Every base matters: assessing small subunit rRNA primers for marine microbiomes with mock communities, time series and global field samples. Environ Microbiol. 2016;18:1403–14.
Pjevac P, Hausmann B, Schwarz J, Kohl G, Herbold CW, Loy A, et al. An economical and flexible dual barcoding, two-step PCR approach for highly multiplexed amplicon sequencing. Front Microbiol. 2021;12:669776.
McLaren MR, Callahan BJ. Silva 138.1 prokaryotic SSU taxonomic training data formatted for DADA2 [Data set]. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4587955.
Quast C, Pruesse E, Yilmaz P, Gerken J, Schweer T, Yarza P, et al. The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41:D590–6.
Andersen KS, Kirkegaard RH, Karst SM, Albertsen M. ampvis2: an R package to analyse and visualise 16S rRNA amplicon data. 2018. https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/299537v1.
Bushnell B. BBMap: a fast, accurate, splice-aware aligner. Berkeley, CA, USA: Lawrence Berkeley National Lab. (LBNL); 2014.
Nurk S, Meleshko D, Korobeynikov A, Pevzner PA. metaSPAdes: a new versatile metagenomic assembler. Genome Res. 2017;27:824–34.
Nurk S, Bankevich A, Antipov D, Gurevich A, Korobeynikov A, Lapidus A, et al. Assembling genomes and mini-metagenomes from highly chimeric reads. In: Research in Computational Molecular Biology. Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2013. p. 158–70.
Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, Fennell T, Ruan J, Homer N, et al. The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:2078–9.
Eren AM, Esen ÖC, Quince C, Vineis JH, Morrison HG, Sogin ML, et al. Anvi’o: an advanced analysis and visualization platform for ‘omics data. PeerJ. 2015;3:e1319.
Alneberg J, Bjarnason BS, de Bruijn I, Schirmer M, Quick J, Ijaz UZ, et al. Binning metagenomic contigs by coverage and composition. Nat Methods. 2014;11:1144–6.
Kang DD, Li F, Kirton E, Thomas A, Egan R, An H, et al. MetaBAT 2: an adaptive binning algorithm for robust and efficient genome reconstruction from metagenome assemblies. PeerJ. 2019;7:e7359.
Olm MR, Brown CT, Brooks B, Banfield JF. dRep: a tool for fast and accurate genomic comparisons that enables improved genome recovery from metagenomes through de-replication. ISME J. 2017;11:2864–8.
Parks DH, Imelfort M, Skennerton CT, Hugenholtz P, Tyson GW. CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res. 2015;25:1043–55.
Chaumeil P-A, Mussig AJ, Hugenholtz P, Parks DH. GTDB-Tk: a toolkit to classify genomes with the Genome Taxonomy Database. Bioinformatics. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btz848.
Parks DH, Chuvochina M, Chaumeil P-A, Rinke C, Mussig AJ, Hugenholtz P. A complete domain-to-species taxonomy for Bacteria and Archaea. Nat Biotechnol. 2020;38:1079–86.
Parks DH, Chuvochina M, Waite DW, Rinke C, Skarshewski A, Chaumeil P-A, et al. A standardized bacterial taxonomy based on genome phylogeny substantially revises the tree of life. Nat Biotechnol. 2018;36:996–1004.
Matsen FA, Kodner RB, Armbrust EV. pplacer: linear time maximum-likelihood and Bayesian phylogenetic placement of sequences onto a fixed reference tree. BMC Bioinform. 2010;11:538.
Jain C, Rodriguez-R LM, Phillippy AM, Konstantinidis KT, Aluru S. High throughput ANI analysis of 90K prokaryotic genomes reveals clear species boundaries. Nat Commun. 2018;9:5114.
Hyatt D, Chen G-L, Locascio PF, Land ML, Larimer FW, Hauser LJ. Prodigal: prokaryotic gene recognition and translation initiation site identification. BMC Bioinform. 2010;11:119.
Price MN, Dehal PS, Arkin AP. FastTree 2-approximately maximum-likelihood trees for large alignments. PLoS ONE. 2010;5:e9490.
Eddy SR. Accelerated profile HMM searches. PLoS Comput Biol. 2011;7:e1002195.
Ondov BD, Treangen TJ, Melsted P, Mallonee AB, Bergman NH, Koren S, et al. Mash: fast genome and metagenome distance estimation using MinHash. Genome Biol. 2016;17:132.
Trifinopoulos J, Nguyen L-T, von Haeseler A, Minh BQ. W-IQ-TREE: a fast online phylogenetic tool for maximum likelihood analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44:W232–5.
Letunic I, Bork P. Interactive Tree Of Life (iTOL) v5: an online tool for phylogenetic tree display and annotation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021;49:W293–W296.
Varghese NJ, Mukherjee S, Ivanova N, Konstantinidis KT, Mavrommatis K, Kyrpides NC, et al. Microbial species delineation using whole genome sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43:6761–71.
Qin Q-L, Xie B-B, Zhang X-Y, Chen X-L, Zhou B-C, Zhou J, et al. A proposed genus boundary for the prokaryotes based on genomic insights. J Bacteriol. 2014;196:2210–5.
Huerta-Cepas J, Szklarczyk D, Heller D, Hernández-Plaza A, Forslund SK, Cook H, et al. eggNOG 5.0: a hierarchical, functionally and phylogenetically annotated orthology resource based on 5090 organisms and 2502 viruses. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47:D309–D314.
Huerta-Cepas J, Forslund K, Coelho LP, Szklarczyk D, Jensen LJ, von Mering C, et al. Fast genome-wide functional annotation through orthology assignment by eggNOG-Mapper. Mol Biol Evol. 2017;34:2115–22.
Brettin T, Davis JJ, Disz T, Edwards RA, Gerdes S, Olsen GJ, et al. RASTtk: a modular and extensible implementation of the RAST algorithm for building custom annotation pipelines and annotating batches of genomes. Sci Rep. 2015;5:8365.
Mahram A, Herbordt MC. NCBI BLASTP on high-performance reconfigurable computing systems. ACM Trans Reconfigurable Technol Syst. 2015;7:1–20.
Yang Z. PAML: a program package for phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. Comput Appl Biosci. 1997;13:555–6.
Osvatic J, Wilkins L. Strength of selection scripts. FigShare. 2022;8. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.20626746.v1.
Amann RI, Binder BJ, Olson RJ, Chisholm SW, Devereux R, Stahl DA. Combination of 16S rRNA-targeted oligonucleotide probes with flow cytometry for analyzing mixed microbial populations. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1990;56:1919–25.
Lan Y, Sun J, Chen C, Sun Y, Zhou Y, Yang Y, et al. Hologenome analysis reveals dual symbiosis in the deep-sea hydrothermal vent snail Gigantopelta aegis. Nat Commun. 2021;12:1165.
Leray M, Wilkins LGE, Apprill A, Bik HM, Clever F, Connolly SR, et al. Natural experiments and long-term monitoring are critical to understand and predict marine host-microbe ecology and evolution. PLoS Biol. 2021;19:e3001322.
Petersen Jillian M, Yuen B, Alexandre G. The symbiotic ‘all-rounders’: partnerships between marine animals and chemosynthetic nitrogen-fixing bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 2020;87:e02129–20.
Johnson KS, Childress JJ, Hessler RR, Sakamoto-Arnold CM, Beehler CL. Chemical and biological interactions in the Rose Garden hydrothermal vent field, Galapagos spreading center. Deep Sea Res A. 1988;35:1723–44.
Kennicutt ME II, Brooks JM, Burke RA Jr. Hydrocarbon seepage, gas hydrates, and authigenic carbonate in the northwestern Gulf of Mexico. Offshore Technology Conference; 1989. https://doi.org/10.4043/5952-ms.
Lilley MD, Butterfield DA, Olson EJ, Lupton JE, Macko SA, McDuff RE. Anomalous CH4 and NH4+ concentrations at an unsedimented mid-ocean-ridge hydrothermal system. Nature. 1993;364:45–47.
Von Damm KL, Edmond JM, Measures CI, Grant B. Chemistry of submarine hydrothermal solutions at Guaymas Basin, Gulf of California. Geochim Cosmochim Acta. 1985;49:2221–37.
Lee RW, Thuesen EV, Childress JJ. Ammonium and free amino acids as nitrogen sources for the chemoautotrophic symbiosis Solemya reidi Bernard (Bivalvia: Protobranchia). J Exp Mar Bio Ecol. 1992;158:75–91.
Sanders JG, Beinart RA, Stewart FJ, Delong EF, Girguis PR. Metatranscriptomics reveal differences in in situ energy and nitrogen metabolism among hydrothermal vent snail symbionts. ISME J. 2013;7:1556–67.
Touchette BW, Burkholder JM. Review of nitrogen and phosphorus metabolism in seagrasses. J Exp Mar Bio Ecol. 2000;250:133–67.
Fourqurean JW, Zieman JC, Powell GVN. Relationships between porewater nutrients and seagrasses in a subtropical carbonate environment. Mar Biol. 1992;114:57–65.
Williams SL. Experimental studies of Caribbean seagrass bed development. Ecol Monogr. 1990;60:449–69.
Herbert RA. Nitrogen cycling in coastal marine ecosystems. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 1999;23:563–90.
Risgaard-Petersen N, Dalsgaard T, Rysgaard S, Christensen PB, Borum J, McGlathery K, et al. Nitrogen balance of a temperate eelgrass Zostera marina bed. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 1998;174:281–91.
Bristow LA, Dalsgaard T, Tiano L, Mills DB, Bertagnolli AD, Wright JJ, et al. Ammonium and nitrite oxidation at nanomolar oxygen concentrations in oxygen minimum zone waters. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2016;113:10601–6.
Karthäuser C, Ahmerkamp S, Marchant HK, Bristow LA, Hauss H, Iversen MH, et al. Small sinking particles control anammox rates in the Peruvian oxygen minimum zone. Nat Commun. 2021;12:3235.
Kuypers MMM, Lavik G, Woebken D, Schmid M, Fuchs BM, Amann R, et al. Massive nitrogen loss from the Benguela upwelling system through anaerobic ammonium oxidation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102:6478–83.
Johnson KS, Beehler CL, Sakamoto-Arnold CM, Childress JJ. In situ measurements of chemical distributions in a deep-sea hydrothermal vent field. Science. 1986;231:1139–41.
Childress JJ, Girguis PR. The metabolic demands of endosymbiotic chemoautotrophic metabolism on host physiological capacities. J Exp Biol. 2011;214:312–25.
Hentschel U, Hand S, Felbeck H. The contribution of nitrate respiration to the energy budget of the symbiont-containing clam Lucinoma aequizonata: a calorimetric study. J Exp Biol. 1996;199:427–33.
Breusing C, Mitchell J, Delaney J, Sylva SP, Seewald JS, Girguis PR, et al. Physiological dynamics of chemosynthetic symbionts in hydrothermal vent snails. ISME J. 2020;14:2568–79.
Amorim K, Loick-Wilde N, Yuen B, Osvatic JT, Wäge-Recchioni J, Hausmann B, et al. Chemoautotrophy, symbiosis and sedimented diatoms support high biomass of benthic molluscs in the Namibian shelf. Sci Rep. 2022;12:9731.
Breusing C, Johnson SB, Tunnicliffe V, Clague DA, Vrijenhoek RC, Beinart RA. Allopatric and sympatric drivers of speciation in Alviniconcha hydrothermal vent snails. Mol Biol Evol. 2020;37:3469–84.
Giovannoni SJ, Cameron Thrash J, Temperton B. Implications of streamlining theory for microbial ecology. ISME J. 2014;8:1553–65.
Brissac T, Gros O, Merçot H. Lack of endosymbiont release by two Lucinidae (Bivalvia) of the genus Codakia: consequences for symbiotic relationships. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2009;67:261–7.
Werner GDA, Cornelissen JHC, Cornwell WK, Soudzilovskaia NA, Kattge J, West SA, et al. Symbiont switching and alternative resource acquisition strategies drive mutualism breakdown. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2018;115:5229–34.
Sudakaran S, Kost C, Kaltenpoth M. Symbiont acquisition and replacement as a source of ecological innovation. Trends Microbiol. 2017;25:375–90.
Li Y, Liles MR, Halanych KM. Endosymbiont genomes yield clues of tubeworm success. ISME J. 2018;12:2785–95.
Moran NA, Yun Y. Experimental replacement of an obligate insect symbiont. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2015;112:2093–6.
Sørensen MES, Wood AJ, Cameron DD, Brockhurst MA. Rapid compensatory evolution can rescue low fitness symbioses following partner switching. Curr Biol. 2021;31:3721–3728.e4.
Taylor JD, Glover EA, Smith L, Ikebe C, Williams ST. New molecular phylogeny of Lucinidae: increased taxon base with focus on tropical Western Atlantic species (Mollusca: Bivalvia). Zootaxa. 2016;4196:zootaxa.4196.3.2.
Osvatic J. Fig1 gtdb tree and alignment. figshare. 2021. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.16837216.v1.
Osvatic J. Figure 2: GTDB alignment and phylogeny. 2021. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.16837237.
We thank Emily Glover (Natural History Museum in London, UK) and Philippe Bouchet (Natural History Museum in Paris, France) for providing preserved samples. We thank Nora Grossschmidt for helping with DNA extractions. The work was also supported by the ERC Starting Grant EvoLucin (grant number 802494), a Vienna Research Grant for Young Investigators from the Vienna Science and Technology Fund (WWTF, VRG14-021), and the Austrian Academy of Sciences. PRG’s contributions were supported by the Schmidt Ocean Institute (expedition and grant FK181005), by NASA (Grant No. NNX17AB31G), and by the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation (grant #9208). Sequencing was carried out at the Joint Microbiome Facility (JMF) of the Medical University of Vienna and the University of Vienna (project IDs JMF-1911-9, JMF-2104-13, and JMF-2002-8). Thanks to Petra Pjevac and Gudrun Kohl for sample processing at JMF. The gill embedding was performed by the Histopathology Facility at Vienna BioCenter Core Facilities (VBCF), a member of the Vienna BioCenter (VBC), Austria. Thanks to the Life Science Computer Cluster at the University of Vienna for the computational resources used throughout analysis. We also thank Thalassa for 300 million years of sheltering lucinids and Arthur Curry (and Jason Momoa).
A corresponding author, JMP, is Editor-in-Chief at the ISME journal.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Osvatic, J.T., Yuen, B., Kunert, M. et al. Gene loss and symbiont switching during adaptation to the deep sea in a globally distributed symbiosis. ISME J 17, 453–466 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41396-022-01355-z