Abstract
While soil erosion drives land degradation, the impact of erosion on soil microbial communities and multiple soil functions remains unclear. This hinders our ability to assess the true impact of erosion on soil ecosystem services and our ability to restore eroded environments. Here we examined the effect of erosion on microbial communities at two sites with contrasting soil texture and climates. Eroded plots had lower microbial network complexity, fewer microbial taxa, and fewer associations among microbial taxa, relative to non-eroded plots. Soil erosion also shifted microbial community composition, with decreased relative abundances of dominant phyla such as Proteobacteria, Bacteroidetes, and Gemmatimonadetes. In contrast, erosion led to an increase in the relative abundances of some bacterial families involved in N cycling, such as Acetobacteraceae and Beijerinckiaceae. Changes in microbiota characteristics were strongly related with erosion-induced changes in soil multifunctionality. Together, these results demonstrate that soil erosion has a significant negative impact on soil microbial diversity and functionality.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Soil erosion has been identified as one of the greatest challenges for soil health and sustainable development [1,2,3,4]. Soil erosion has been accelerated by intensive human activities and extreme climate events [3,4,5]. Erosion has impacted ~84% of world land surfaces and has led to the degradation of >33% of Earth’s soils [5]. It has been predicted that by 2050 degradation will increase up to 90% [6], severely threatening human welfare [4]. Erosion results in the loss of fertile topsoil and nutrients, which support microbial habitats and soil ecosystem services, leading to reduced productivity [1, 7]. Current soil erosion events are projected to result in a 50% loss in crop yields [6]. Moreover, erosion has profound influences on the environment by affecting greenhouse gases and the emission of agricultural pollutants [8,9,10,11,12,13]. Given its impact on world-wide sustainable development, the United Nations initiated the Stop Soil Erosion, Save Our Future campaign as the topic of the 2019 World Soil Day [6].
Multiple ecological functions occur simultaneously rather than individually. Therefore, use of integrative measure of multiple functions (i.e., multifunctionality, including nutrient cycling, decomposition, primary production, climate regulation, etc.) would increase our ability to understand and predict the services that the soils and the ecosystems provide and how such services respond to biodiversity and environmental changes [14,15,16,17].
Soil microbiota are fundamental to the functioning of ecosystem and soil ecological processes, regulating energy flow and mass fluxes, and mediating the response of soil ecosystem to anthropogenic disturbances and environmental changes [15, 18,19,20,21,22]. The composition, structure and functionality of soil microbiota are sensitive to changes in soil environments [23,24,25,26,27,28]. Any changes in soil microbiota would also have important broad environmental impact by influencing greenhouse gas emissions and carbon and nutrient cycling [29, 30]. Given the importance of soil microbial diversity for ecosystem multifunctionality [15, 31,32,33], they must be considered when examining the mechanisms behind the response of terrestrial ecosystems to erosion.
The soil microbial world is incredibly diverse with tens of thousands of species members in one gram of soil [18, 34], and diversity is often not adequate to understand microbiome functioning. Associations among individual microbes, sometimes examined via co-occurrence networks, and their functional groups can reveal ecological relationships based on resource availability and environmental heterogeneity [35, 36]. Although co-occurrence network analysis may not always indicate true biotic associations [37], it can help understand the complexity of microbiomes and how such complexity might change in response to environmental factors and how microbe-microbe associations might have implications for ecosystem functioning [23, 36, 38]. Network analysis can also reveal why some microbial groups consistently occur together or whether certain microbial taxa are more important for maintaining network structure. The complexity of co-occurrence network can be assessed by relevant network scores such as degree, clustering coefficient and modularity, which indicate the connectivity among operational-taxonomic units (OTUs). A pertinent question is how soil microbiome complexity, as indicated by network connectivity, changes in response to soil erosion. This is particularly important because recent studies have shown that network connectivity can have important implications for microbiome stability and ecosystem multifunctionality [33]. In addition, keystone microbial taxa are highly connected taxonomic groups that individually, or in a guild, exert a significant influence on microbiome structure and functioning irrespective of their abundance across space and time [39]. These taxa may confer greater biotic connectivity to the community and can be indicators of community shifts [40]. Since a loss of keystone taxa can negatively affect network connectivity, identifying such taxa across erosion levels can yield insights into the impact of erosion, with subsequent implications for microbiome functioning and ecosystem multifunctionality.
The composition and functionality of soil microbiota are regulated by soil abiotic characteristics including pH, texture, and nutrient and moisture availabilities [14, 27, 41], which are likely to be sensitive to soil erosion. Erosion has been shown to negatively impact microbial biomass, abundance, and composition by altering natural soil characteristics and removing vegetation protection [42,43,44]. In turn, all of these changes may alter the turnover and availability of soil nutrients and soil functionality. Despite their obvious importance, however, it is still unclear how soil erosion and soil degradation induced by erosion alters the structure and function as well as the associations among microbes. In order to restore eroded environments, it is essential that we gain a mechanistic understanding of biotic and abiotic changes induced by erosion and related soil degradation [15, 18,19,20,21,22].
Here we evaluated the response of soil microbial community to erosion by examining how the diversity, composition and network complexity of soil microbiomes differ between non-eroded and eroded plots with varying erosion intensities. We also determined whether erosion-induced changes in microbial communities are associated with soil multifunctionality. We hypothesized that erosion would negatively impact soil microbial diversity and network complexity. To test this hypothesis, we established two independent studies in markedly different systems/sites to examine whether responses would be similar in such different contexts. The study was conducted at Nenjiang in Heilongjiang Province and at Fuxian in Shaanxi Province of China (Fig. S1). These two sites are separated by a distance of 2500 km but represent two important soil erosion regions in China, and have contrasting soil texture (clay loam vs. sandy loam), climates (mean annual temperature of 0.4 vs. 9.0 °C) and erosion history (>50 years vs. 27 years) [45,46,47]. At both sites, we selected plots comprising four erosion intensities (i.e., non-eroded soils, lightly eroded soils, moderately eroded soils, and heavily eroded soils) to compose an erosion gradient. The vegetation was the same across the soil erosion gradient at each site (i.e., agroecosystem, with maize and soybean for >50 years at the Nenjiang site and, bare land without any crop for 27 years at Fuxian).
At each site we measured a range of soil physical, chemical, and microbial properties, soil functional parameters, and generated a soil multifunctionality index. We also quantified the diversity and composition of soil bacteria by using 16 S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing. This date was used to construct co-occurrence networks to explore the associations among microbes and identified microbial keystone taxa. Lastly, we linked these parameters to soil functions to test whether microbial community characteristics were related to soil quality and soil erosion. We demonstrated that soil erosion reduced soil multifunctionality and bacterial diversity as well as network complexity and associations among microbial taxa. Moreover, changes in microbiota characteristics were positively related with erosion-induced changes in soil multifunctionality.
Materials and methods
Study sites and soil sampling
To examine erosion-induced changes in soil multifunctionality and microbiological properties, two sites were selected at Fuxian (Shaanxi Province) and at Nenjiang (Heilongjiang Province), China. The Fuxian and Nenjiang sites represent the two important soil erosion regions in China, i.e., the Loess Plateau and Northeast China black soil regions, respectively. The two regions together accounted for about 51% of China’s soil erosion regions. Soil erosion in the Loess Plateau region occurs in steep and short slopes, with slope degrees of >15° and a length ~200 m. Soil erosion in Northeast China region occurs on gentle but long slopes, with slope degrees of 1–5° and a length ~2 km.
The soils at Fuxian are loess soils, which corresponds to Calcic Chernozems in FAO taxonomy. The clay content is 11–21%, and the texture is sandy loam. The Nenjiang site has a black soil, which corresponds to Luvic Phaeozem in FAO taxonomy. The clay content is 25–35%, and the texture is clay loam. The climate at Fuxian is characterized by a warm temperate monsoon climate, with a mean annual temperature (MAT) of ~9.0 °C and the mean annual precipitation (MAP) of 577 mm. The climate at Nenjiang is characterized by a cold and semiarid climate, with a MAT and MAP of 0.4 °C and 500 mm, respectively.
In the harvest season of 2017, soil samples were collected from each site. At Nenjiang, we established our sampling plots in a maize (Zea mays L.) field (with a width of 260 m and length of 900 m) that was converted from forests more than 50 years ago for agricultural production. The site was in a small watershed in Nenjiang farm (48°59′-49°03′N, 125°16′-125°21′E). The soils were mechanically tilled to 20–30 cm depth every year. Details of the study slope were previously described Zhang et al. [45] and Li et al. [46]. In early October 2017, we established two sampling transects along the slope to collect soil samples. At Fuxian, we selected two cultivated slopes converted from forest in a small watershed (109°11′E, 36°05′N). The two slopes have a width of 13 m, and length of 79 and 83 m, respectively. These two slopes were established in 1989 to simulate soil erosion in cultivated slopes [47]. The soils in the cultivated slopes were tilled to 20-cm-deep before rain season (May) with tillage method widely used in the Fuxian region. The slopes did not receive any fertilization, nor planted with any crop since their establishment. The weeds in the slopes were removed by hand. In late September 2017, we conducted soil sampling in the two slopes.
The erosion usually occurs in slopes while the intensity varies with positions along slope, usually increasing with the degree of slope and the distance from upper slope. Four positions along each of the two slopes/transects were selected at both the Fuxian and Nenjiang sites to represent various soil erosion intensities, i.e., non-erosion (E0), lightly erosion (EL), moderately erosion (EM), or heavily erosion (EH). The erosion modulus in E0, EL, EM and EH sites were <500, 500–2500, 2500–5000 and 5000–8000 t km−2 a−1, respectively.
In this study, we assumed that soils in all the sampling plots at each slope were the same before erosion, and that any variations in soil properties and microbiota parameters among erosion treatments could be ascribed to soil erosion. The slopes at Nenjiang were planted with the same crops (maize or soybean over the 50 years) and the slopes at Fuxian did not have any crop, the effects of erosion across the erosion gradient within the same site were not affected by vegetation or land use variation. Moreover, the textural composition (clay, silt and sand) and pH in deep soils (30–50 and 50–70 cm for Nenjiang, 20–40 and 40–60 cm for Fuxian) were similar among the four positions in each slope/transect (Fig. S2). Given that soil properties in deep soils were minimally affected by erosion, these similarities suggest that the soils along the slope/transect were similar before erosion, supporting our assumption.
We established three plots (10 × 10 m for Nenjiang, and 2 × 2 m for Fuxian) in each of different slope positions for soil sampling, resulting in a total of 24 samples per site (e.g., 2 transects/slopes × 4 positions × 3 plots). The sampling size was greater at Nenjiang than Fuxian because the size of the slope was greater at Nenjiang (260 m by 900 m) than Fuxian (13 m by ~80 m). In each sampling plot, three soil samples were collected from the 0–20 cm depth, with a 5.0 cm diameter sterilized soil auger. Samples were combined as a composite sample for each plot and were used to measure soil functional metrics as well as soil microbiota.
Soil analyses
For this study, 13 soil variables were measured, of which 12 were used to assess the overall functioning of the soil (expressed as soil multifunctionality, MF). The soil metrics included soil moisture, pH, organic carbon (OC), total nitrogen (TN), total P (TP), ammonium (NH4+) and nitrate (NO3-) contents, available phosphorous (AP) and potassium (AK) contents, microbial carbon (MBC) and nitrogen (MBN) contents, net mineralized organic carbon (Cm) and nitrogen (Nm). These variables provide information on a range of soil processes including nutrient availability, biogeochemical cycling and microbial productivity. Soil variables were measured using standard methods as described in Page et al. [48]. Soil moisture was measured by drying fresh soil samples at 105 °C to constant weight. Soil pH was measured in a soil: water (1:5) extract with a pH meter. Soil OC and TN were measured using the Walkley-Black and Kjeldahl method. Soil TP was measured by colorimetric analysis after digestion with sulfuric acid and perchloric acid. Soil NH4+ and NO3- were measured using a continuous flow analyzer (AutoAnalyzer-AA3, Seal Analytical, Norderstedt, Germany) after extraction with 2 mol L−1 KCl. Soil AP was determined by the Olsen method. Soil AK was extracted with neutral ammonium acetate and measured by atomic absorption spectrometry (ZL-5100, PerkinElmer, MA). Soil MBC and MBN were measured using the fumigation extraction method [49] and a conversion factor of 0.45 and 0.54 was used to calculate MBC and MBN. The Cm and Nm was measured by incubating 10 g soil samples in jar at standard temperature (25 °C) for 28 days. Air samples were collected in days 0, 3, 7, 14, 21 and 28 after incubation for CO2 measurement with a CO2/H2O Analyzer (LI-6262, LI-COR Biosciences, Lincoln, NE). The total amount of CO2 released from soils was used to calculate the cumulative OC mineralized (Cm, mg CO2 kg−1). The net N mineralization (Nm, mg kg−1) was calculated as the difference of mineral N (NO3- + NH4+) before and after the incubation. Soil pH is important in determining nutrients cycling and availability, however, because pH is a logarithmic scale, we did not include soil pH when calculating multifunctionality index.
Soil multifunctionality was assessed according to Fanin et al. [16]. In brief, data were tested for normal distribution by Shapiro-Wilk test prior to analyses. The non-normally distributed data were logarithm- or square root-transformed to make them close to normal distribution. For the variable that had negative values, we transformed the variable to be positive by subtracting the minimum value from the whole dataset. We then standardized the variables to the scale of 0 to 1, and take the average of these transformed values as multifunctionality values for each plot [16]. This method has been widely used [14, 16, 50, 51].
Amplicon sequencing
Total DNA was extracted from soils by using FastDNA Spin Kits (MP Biomedical, Santa Ana, CA) as previously described [52]. The 515 F 5′-barcode- (GTGCCAGCMGCCGCGG)-3’ and 907 R 5′-CCGTCAATTCMTTTRAGTTT-3′ primers were used to amply 16 S rRNA gene at the hypervariable V4-V5 regions for bacterial and archaeal [53, 54]. Briefly, PCR was conducted in triplicate under the following conditions: 95 °C for 2 min, followed by 25 cycles at 95 °C for 30 s, 55 °C for 30 s, and 72 °C for 30 s and a final extension at 72 °C for 5 min. Sequencing libraries were prepared by using Illumina Nextera kit. Paired-end sequencing (2 × 250) was done by using an Illumina HiSeq 2500 platform (Shanghai BIOZERON Co., Ltd) at the Realbio Genomics Institute, Shanghai, China. Raw sequence data has been deposited in the sequence read archive at the N′CBI (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) under accession numbers PRJNA625503. The SHI7 program was used to trim and process the raw sequence reads by removing Nextera adapters, assembling sequences, and maintaining quality score via the threshold Q35 [55]. The trimmed sequences reads were further subjected to denoising, dereplication, and compaction by using NINJA-OPS program [56]. The high-quality sequence reads were aligned to Greengenes database 13_8 to obtain OTUs with 97% similarity by using Bowtie2 [57, 58]. More than 99.9% of our sequence reads were mapped against the database. A total of 3,222,996 reads were obtained from 48 samples, ranging from 21,111 to 119,141 reads per sample.
Statistical analysis
Alpha diversity indices including Shannon index, observed species, and abundance-based coverage estimate (ACE) were calculated by using Mothur software8. Beta diversity among various erosion levels was evaluated by using Mothur with analysis of similarity (ANOSIM) function through Bray-Curtis dissimilarity matrices [59], and the P values were adjusted by Bonferroni correction as default in anosim function. Ordination of Bray-Curtis distance was performed by using Constrained Principle Coordinate Analysis (CPCoA) through the capscale function implemented in the vegan R library [60, 61]. ANOVA test via 10,000 permutations was used to calculate statistical significance.
Co-occurrence networks were constructed by using the WGCNA package based on the Spearman’s correlation matrices of Fuxian and Nenjiang [62]. Only OTUs with relative abundance >0.01% were used in the analyses. In networks, OTUs represent nodes, while correlations between OTUs are displayed as edges. Random matrix theory (RMT) was achieved to identify the appropriate similarity of 0.84 and 0.86 as the thresholds for Fuxian and Nenjiang, respectively [63]. Benjamini and Hochberg false discovery rate (FDR) were used to adjust the P values (P < 0.05) in the correlation [64]. The network properties were obtained by using the igraph package [65]. The network topological characteristics of each sample were implemented in subgraph function via the igraph package as described by Ma et al. [66]. The parameters describing network topological characteristics used in this study included node number (the number of OTUs), edge number (the number of connections among all of the nodes), betweenness (the number of times a node acts as a bridge along the shortest path between two other nodes), and assortativity (the extent of nodes in a network associate with other nodes in the network). A combination of degree, closeness centrality, betweenness centrality, and transitivity was used to statistically identify microbial keystone OTUs [67]. In this study, OTUs with degree and weighted degree >6, closeness centrality >0.14, and betweenness centrality <0.05, and transitivity (clustering coefficient) >0.09 were selected as potential keystone taxa. Visualization of co-occurrence network was performed by using Gephi [68]. Potential function among microbiota in different erosions levels was predicted by using Functional Annotation of Prokaryotic Taxa (FAPROTAX) via the default settings on the basis of taxonomic information of microorganisms [69].
We conducted mixed effect analysis of variance (ANOVA) to test the effects of site and erosion intensity on soil properties, multifunctionality, alpha-diversity metrics, parameters of co-occurrence networks. Prior to the analysis, data normality and homoscedasticity of variances was tested, and log- or log(x + 1) transformation was performed when necessary. We conducted generalized linear mixed effect model (GLMM) to examine the effects of site and erosion intensity on relative abundance of bacteria at phylum and family levels, and relative abundance of potential keystone taxa. Both mixed effect ANOVA and GLMM allow us to examine whether the effect of erosion intensity vary with sites. The effect of transect/slope was included as random effect. Specifically, we conducted site independent non-parametric test (Kruskal-Wallis test) to examine the effect of erosion on relative abundance of bacteria at phylum and family levels, and keystone taxa at each site. The ANOVA was conducted with JMP 10.0 (SAS Institute, Cary). The GLMM and Kruskal-Wallis test were conducted in R environment (v3.6.3; http://www.r-project.org/). Post hoc comparison was conducted by either the Turkey’s (for ANOVA) or Duncan’s test (Kruskal-Wallis test). Because some phyla and families were not identified simultaneously at both sites, we firstly conducted site independent analysis to test the effects of erosion intensity on relative abundance of all the identified phyla and of families with relative abundances of >1% for each site (Tables S1–S2). Specifically, at the phylum level, we examined the dominate taxa (Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, Acidobacteria, Bacteroidetes, and Gemmatimonadetes) that accounted for more than 85% of the relative abundance of all identified phyla across both sites. At the family level, prior site independent analysis showed that erosion intensity significantly affected Chitinophagaceae, Gaiellaceae Solirubrobacteraceae, Nocardioidaceae at Fuxian, and Comamonadaceae, Haliangiaceae, Acidobacteriaceae, Nocardioidaceae and Frankiaceae at Nenjiang (Table S2), thereby these 8 families were examined to assess the effect of erosion intensity and whether such effect vary with sites.
We used linear regression analysis to establish relationship of soil MF to alpha-diversity metrics, parameters of co-occurrence networks and relative abundance of keystone taxa. Pearson correlations were used to assess the relationships of alpha-diversity metrics to soil properties. The redundancy analysis (RDA) was used to evaluate relationships between relative abundance of bacteria at phylum and family levels to soil moisture and nutrients. The linear regression and Pearson correlation analyses were conducted using JMP 10.0 (SAS Institute, Cary). The RDA was done in R environment (v3.6.3; http://www.r-project.org/).
Results
Soil quality and multifunctionality
Soil erosion caused significant changes in soil edaphic properties and reduced soil multifunctionality at both sites; however, the effects of erosion were greater at Nenjiang than at Fuxian (Table 1). The OC and TN contents, quantities of most available nutrients, MBC and MBN, and soil moisture were lower in eroded plots than in non-eroded plots at both sites. The net mineralized OC and N were also lower in eroded than in no-eroded plots at the Nenjiang site, but not at the Fuxian site. Soil erosion was negatively related to multiple soil parameters (e.g., soil multifunctionality) and soil multifunctionality was lower in eroded plots (Table 1).
Soil microbial diversity and its contribution to multifunctionality
Erosion resulted in marked declines in soil microbial diversity with greater effects at the Nenjiang than the Fuxian site (Fig. 1a, c, e, Table S3). The Shannon index, ACE, and observed species numbers were significantly lower in the eroded plots than in non-eroded plots at both sites. Nevertheless, soil microbial diversity was significantly and positively correlated with MF at each site (P < 0.05, Fig. 1b, d, f), and also correlated positively with most of the individual soil properties (e.g., OC and TN contents, available nutrients, and MBC and MBN) (P < 0.05, Fig. S3). Therefore, losses of microbial diversity in eroded soils were associated with downward shifts in soil ecosystem functions.
Microbial community structure was also significantly affected by erosion and the concurrent changes in soil properties at both sites (Fig. 2). Soil community composition significantly differed between heavily eroded plots and non-eroded plots (P = 0.002) and between heavily eroded plots and lightly eroded plots (P = 0.004) at the Nenjiang site, and between non-eroded plots and moderately eroded plots (P < 0.001) and between non-eroded plots and heavily eroded plots (P = 0.004) at the Fuxian site, respectively (Table S4). Constrained principle coordinate analysis (CPCoA) showed that microbial communities strongly clustered according to soil erosion intensity, which explained ~16 and 21% of the total variation at the Nenjiang and Fuxian sites, respectively (Fig. 2a, b). These results indicated that soil erosion critically influenced the belowground microbiota.
Soil microbial composition
Microbial communities in soils at both sites were primarily comprised of members of the phyla Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, Acidobacteria, Bacteroidetes, and Gemmatimonadetes, accounting for ~85% of the relative abundance of all the identified phyla (Fig. S4). Erosion significantly decreased the relative abundance of Proteobacteria and Gemmatimonadetes at Nenjiang and Bacteroidetes at the Fuxian site (Fig. 2c, d, Tables S1 and S5). The abundance of Actinobacteria was significantly increased at Nenjiang, but slightly decreased at Fuxian. In contrast, the abundance of Acidobacteria was significantly increased at Fuxian, but only slightly decreased at the Nenjiang site (Fig. 2c, d, Tables S1 and S5).
At the family level, about 57–63% and 29–41% of the bacteria were not identified at the Fuxian and Nenjiang sites, respectively (Fig. S4). Consequently, we first focused on the response of bacteria with relative abundances of >1% to soil erosion, which varied by sites. At the Fuxian site, erosion resulted in a significant decrease in the abundance of Chitinophagaceae, Gaiellaceae, Solirubrobacteraceae, Nocardioidaceae, but had no effect on other taxonomic members. At Nenjiang, erosion resulted in a significant decrease in the abundance of Comamonadaceae, Haliangiaceae, and Nocardioidaceae, and a significant increase in the Acidobacteriaceae and Frankiaceae, but had no effect on other taxonomic members (Fig. 2e, f, Tables S2 and S6).
We classified specific bacteria clades into functional groups based on analyses done using the FAPROTAX (Functional Annotation of Prokaryotic Taxa) program [69], specifically focusing on taxa involved in soil N cycling, which is important for agricultural soils. We identified six bacterial families belonging to four N cycling functional groups, i.e., aerobic ammonia oxidation (Nitrososphaeraceae), aerobic nitrite oxidation (Nitrospiraceae), denitrification (Hyphomicrobiaceae) and nitrogen fixation (Beijerinckiaceae, Acetobacteraceae and Rhodospirillaceae). Results from site independent Kruskal-Wallis test demonstrated that soil erosion significantly increased the abundance of Acetobacteraceae in Fuxian plots (P = 0.0347) and Beijerinckiaceae in Nenjiang plots (P = 0.0114, Fig. S5, Table S7). In addition, the abundance of these two families were negatively related with MF (P = 0.0623 and 0.0002, respectively, Fig. S1). In contrast, the abundance of the other members of the N cycling bacteria identified here were not significantly affected by erosion (Table S7).
Soil microbial network complexity
The network of soil bacterial communities at each site demonstrated distinct co-occurrence patterns (Fig. 3a, b, Table S8). Here we used the network topological parameters of node and edge numbers, and betweenness and assortativity degree, to assess soil microbial network complexity, with higher node and edge numbers and smaller betweenness and assortativity representing greater network complexity. At both sites, the betweenness and assortativity were higher in the eroded plots than in non-eroded plots, whereas the node and edge numbers were lower. Moreover, such effects increased with erosion intensity (Fig. 3c–f). These results strongly suggest that soil erosion affected microbial associations, and thus reduced the complexity of soil microbial community networks. In addition, the changes in network complexity were strongly correlated (P < 0.05) with soil multifunctionality (Fig. 3g–j).
Network analysis also identified the Actinomycetales and Acidimicrobiales (both members of the class Actinobacteria) as keystone OTUs at the Nenjiang site, and the Solirubrobacterales (class Thermoleophilia) at the Fuxian site. The relative abundance of the Solirubrobacterales keystone OTU was positively correlated with MF, but decreased with the intensity of soil erosion at the Fuxian, but not at the Nenjiang site (P < 0.0001, Fig. 4a, b, Tables S9–S10). In contrast, while the relative abundance of the Actinomycetales keystone OTU increased with intensity of soil erosion and was negatively correlated with MF at the Nenjiang site, but not at Fuxian (Fig. 4a, c, Tables S9–S10), the Acidimicrobiales keystone OTU was neither affected by erosion intensity nor correlated with MF at either site.
Discussion
Erosion reduces microbial diversity and soil multifunctionality
Our examination of two sites with contrasting soil texture, climate, and erosion history revealed a consistent erosion-induced decrease in soil biodiversity and functionality. It has been well established that soil erosion results in the deterioration of soil structure, the loss of nutrients, decreases in the availability of nutrients, reduced water availability and a decrease in soil functionality [8,9,10,11,12,13, 70]. However, the impact of erosion on soil microbial communities has received less attention [43], and it was still unknown if erosion induced changes in soil microbial network complexity is linked to reduced soil multifunctionality. The decrease in soil organic matter, nutrients and moisture by erosion (Table 1) could have directly caused the loss of bacterial diversity and functionality because decreased resource availability constrains the metabolism and composition of bacteria [71,72,73] and thus impairs their supports on soil functionality [15, 31]. In addition, increased bulk density and decreased soil organic matter content in eroded soils can cause an increase in soil thermal conductivity and a decrease in soil heat capacity [74], resulting in greater daily and seasonal variation in soil temperature. Although not measured in this study, previous studies have shown greater variation in soil temperature at eroded sites than at non-eroded sites [75, 76]. Thus, the loss of diversity and functionality of soil communities can indirectly be attributed to an increase in soil thermal variability, because most soil microbes are sensitive to local changes in temperature [28, 77,78,79].
Shifts in composition of soil bacteria
At the phylum level, we found decreases in the relative abundances of Proteobacteria, Bacteroidetes and Gemmatimonadetes by erosion. The Proteobacteria was the most abundant phylum in most of the soil samples collected in this study. Many Proteobacteria are considered copiotrophic, having relatively fast growth rate and capability to use various substrates [80,81,82]. The Bacteroidetes were previously reported to be a sensitive biological indicator for agricultural soil usage, with a significant decrease in arable soils than in wastelands [83]. The relative abundance Gemmatimonadetes was reported to be positively correlated with soil nutrients [84] (Fig. S6). Therefore, decrease in the relative abundances of these three phyla found in this study may be related to erosion-induced loss of available substrates and nutrients.
We also found that the abundance of Actinobacteria increased at Nenjiang and Acidobacteria increased at Fuxian. Members of Actinobacteria are sensitive to soil water conditions and negatively correlated with soil moisture [85,86,87,88,89]. In our study, erosion significantly decreased soil moisture at Nenjiang, but had minimum impact at the Fuxian site, which might have influenced the abundance of Actinobacteria in the Nenjiang plots, but not those at Fuxian. This explanation is consistent with the previous reports showing the decrease in the abundance of soil Actinobacteria caused by the addition of water [90]. Acidobacteria are considered to be oligotrophs and are also restricted by soil moisture, having negative correlations with most soil nutrients but a positive correlation with soil moisture [89, 91, 92] (Fig. S6). Consequently, our results suggest that the negative effects of decreasing soil moisture likely offset the positive effects of decreasing soil nutrients in influencing the abundance of Acidobacteria at the Nenjiang site, leading to a lack of response of this phylum to erosion. In contrast, at the Fuxian site, the lower nutrient content, but less of a decrease in soil moisture in eroded plots likely resulted in an elevated abundance of Acidobacteria.
Results of this current study showed that there were significantly lower relative abundances of some bacterial families in the eroded plots than in the non-eroded plots (e.g., Chitinophagaceae, Gaiellaceae, Solirubrobacteraceae and Nocardioidaceae at the Fuxian site, and Comamonadaceae, Haliangiaceae and Nocardioidaceae at the Nenjiang site). This response pattern is likely due to the dependency of these taxa on higher levels of soil moisture and nutrients as shown in Fig. S7 and in previous observations [73, 93, 94]. Interestingly, erosion resulted in an increase in members of the families Acidobacteriaceae and Frankiaceae at the Nenjiang site, most likely due to the negative impacts of soil moisture and nutrients on both families (Fig. S7). Moreover, we found a significant erosion-induced increase in the presence of the N fixing bacteria, Beijerinckiaceae and Acetobacteraceae, at both sites. This increase might be due to the reduction in N availability after erosion, which could make the environment advantageous for N fixing bacteria [95,96,97]. Further research is needed to confirm this supposition, including the comparison of N2 fixation rates between eroded and non-eroded soils. Overall, these results suggest that the shift in composition of bacteria after erosion was closely related with the response of soil conditions.
Erosion affects microbiome complexity and keystone taxa
Our results also demonstrated that erosion reduced the network complexity of soil microbiomes at both sites. Reduced network complexity may result from enhanced resource limitation (e.g., reduced availability of water, soil carbon and nutrients) that impaired microbial diversity and network complexity [23, 35, 36, 98]. These results were consistent with previous observation that soil microbial network complexity increased with resource availability, such as soil fertility [99] and elevated CO2 [24], but decreased with reduced soil fertility [100], water availability [23] and intensified soil management in both agricultural [36] and forest [101] ecosystems.
Keystone taxa represent the highly connected microbes that play important roles in the structure and functions of microbiota and act as indicators of environmental changes [36, 39, 40], and hence are expected to have significant relationships to soil MF. In this study, we identified Solirubrobacterales (at Fuxian) and Actinomycetales and Acidimicrobiales (at Nenjiang) as keystone taxa, which were consistent with previous studies as keystone taxa in grassland, agricultural or desert soils [24, 39, 102,103,104]. While spatiotemporal heterogeneity drives the abundance and distribution of keystone taxa [39], the variations of keystone taxa in this study may result from the difference of pedogenic, adaphic, and climatic factors between these two sites.
That said, we did observe contrasting responses of keystone taxa to erosion between the two sites (Fig. 4a). The decrease in the relative abundance of Solirubrobacterales in response to erosion at Fuxian was expected because Solirubrobacterales was significantly and positively correlated with soil nutrients in previous studies [105, 106] as well as here (Fig. S8). This response pattern was consistent with the observations that the abundance of the class Thermoleophilia decreased significantly with increasing intensity of erosion at this site (P < 0.05, data not shown). The increases in the relative abundance of Actinomycetales in response to erosion at the Nenjiang site were consistent with the results showing that Actinobacteria (at the class level) increased with increasing erosion intensity (P < 0.05, data not shown). Most Actinobacteria favor aerobic environments [107], are adapted to arid conditions and are highly resistant to desiccation and low resource conditions [27, 41, 108]. The high clay and organic matter content in soils from Nenjiang may result in relatively high soil moisture content and potentially soils that are frequently anaerobic. In contrast, erosion often leads to the loss of OC and clay from soils, which decreases the ability of soil to retain water (Table 1), making the soils more aerobic, which could cause the increased abundance of the Actinobacteria. This may explain our observation that the keystone taxon Actinomycetales at the Nenjiang site were negatively correlated with soil OC and moisture (P < 0.05, Fig. S8). Similar to these results, previous studies have also reported that Actinobacteria was negatively related to soil moisture [41, 109], and has contrasting response patterns in responding to land-use change or exotic trees in forest ecosystem when compared with soil properties (i.e., organic matter, total C and N, available N) [110, 111]. Given the significant response to erosion and their relationships to MF (Fig. 4), as well as the important role in structure and function of microbiomes [24, 39, 102, 103], the keystone taxa identified herein (Solirubrobacterales at Fuxian and Actinomycetales at Nenjiang) could be used as an indicator of the effects of soil erosion and erosion intensity on microbial communities and soil multifunctionality.
Variation in the effects of erosion between sites
The results presented here also show that erosion dramatically reduced soil multifunctionality, the diversity and network complexity of soil microbiota at both sites, suggesting that soil microbiota respond in the same way to erosion even in markedly different sites. Nevertheless, the effects of erosion were greater at the Nenjiang than at the Fuxian sites, likely due to the differences in erosion history, initial OC and N levels, and climate. Both sampling sites suffered erosion since their original conversion from forest, but the history of erosion was longer at Nenjiang (>50 years) than Fuxian (27 years). In contrast, soil OC and N were also closely related to the diversity and association among soil microbes [112,113,114]. The erosion-induced changes in OC and TN were also closely correlated to the changes in diversity and association of microbes when examined either across or within sites (Fig. S9). The greater initial or background concentrations of OC and N (present as the OC and TN contents in E0 plot) at the Nenjiang site, which was about threefold greater than that at Fuxian (Table 1). This corresponded to greater decreases in OC and TN after erosion [115] (Table 1), resulting in greater loss of diversity and associations among bacterial communities in eroded soils at the Nenjiang site than those at Fuxian.
Climate also likely has a major impact on soil functionality and microbiota [116,117,118,119]. In this study, we found that mean annual precipitation was similar at both sites (500 and 577 mm at Nenjiang and Fuxian, respectively), which might have similar impacts on rainfall-induced soil erosion. The higher mean annual temperature at Fuxian (9.0 °C) than at Nenjiang (0.4 °C) might have also resulted in larger effects of erosion on soil OC and N and microbiota because the decomposition of soil organic matter [115] and the diversity of soil community increased with temperature [116, 118, 119]. However, the lower concentration of OC and TN in Fuxian soils may have led to limitations in C and nutrients for microbial growth, restricting the effects of erosion in this warm site. Hence, the effects of climate may have been smaller than the effects of erosion history and the initial concentrations of OC and TN on the response of soil functions and diversity to erosion.
Implications
Our findings have important implications for understanding the impact of soil erosion on the structure and function of soil microbial communities and how soil degradation is associated with specific soil microbiota. Erosion induced decreases in diversity and complexity of soil microbial communities at the two divergent sites. Importantly, soil microorganisms have essential supports on soil multifunctionality in diverse ecosystems by enhancing decomposition and nutrient cycling as well as resources availability [15, 32, 33]. The strong association between changes in soil bacterial communities and networks and the erosion-induced changes in soil quality examined herein emphasized the importance of soil communities in supporting multifunctionality in eroding environments (and adverse consequences when they cannot). Moreover, since diverse and complex microbial communities are more resilient to environmental stresses [26,27,28, 120, 121] than simple ones, a decrease in microbial diversity and complexity by soil erosion may have long-term adverse effects on soil functions. Therefore, post-erosion losses in soil multifunctionality and microbial diversity and complexity together can contribute to soil degradation and impair ecosystem services that the soil provides. The improvement of both aspects should be considered when rehabilitating degraded soils. Future research is needed to examine how degraded soil microbial communities and functions recover in response to erosion-prevention practices and mitigation strategies.
Network complexity and network topology as well as keystone taxa are assessed using statistical tools and are based on correlations [66, 67, 98]. Such correlations do not necessarily show cause-effect relationships. Although network complexity and keystone taxa play important role in microbial communities [23, 36, 38] and were significantly correlated with MF (Figs. 3 and 4), the present study did not directly examine such a role. Therefore, how they regulate the relationship between bacterial communities and erosion should be explicitly examined.
References
FAO, ITPS. Status of the World’s Soil Resources - Main report. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and Intergovernmental Technical Panel on Soils, 2015. Rome, Italy. https://www.fao.org/3/a-i5199e.pdf.
UN (United Nations). Sustainable Development Goals [online]. 2015. https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/sustainabledevelopment-goals/.
FAO. 2019. Soil erosion: the greatest challenge for sustainable soil management. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; 2019. p. 104.
Pimentel D, Harvey C, Resosudarmo P, Sinclair K, Kurz D, McNair M, et al. Environmental and economic costs of soil erosion and conservation benefits. Science. 1995;267:1117–23.
Borrelli P, Robinson DA, Fleischer LR, Lugato E, Ballabio C, Alewell C, et al. An assessment of the global impact of 21st century land use change on soil erosion. Nat Commun. 2017;8:1–13.
UN (United Nations). World Soil Day [online]. 2019. https://www.un.org/en/observances/world-soil-day.
Van Oost K, Bakker MM. Soil productivity and erosion. In: Wall DH, Bardgett RD, Behan-Pelletier V, Herrick JE, Jones H, Ritz K, et al. (eds.). Soil ecology and ecosystem services. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2012. 301–14.
Gregorich EG, Greer KJ, Anderson DW, Liang BC. Carbon distribution and losses: erosion and deposition effects. Soil Res. 1998;47:291–302.
Lal R, Pimentel D. Soil erosion: a carbon sink or source? Science. 2008;319:1040–2.
Mendonça R, Müller RA, Clow D, Verpoorter C, Raymond P, Tranvik LJ, et al. Organic carbon burial in global lakes and reservoirs. Nat Commun. 2017;8:1694.
Quinton JN, Govers G, Van Oost K, Bardgett RD. The impact of agricultural soil erosion on biogeochemical cycling. Nat Geosci. 2010;3:311–4.
Smith RW, Bianchi TS, Allison M, Savage C, Galy V. High rates of organic carbon burial in fjord sediments globally. Nat Geosci. 2015;8:450–U46.
Van Oost K, Quine TA, Govers G, De Gryze S, Six J, Harden JW, et al. The impact of agricultural soil erosion on the global carbon cycle. Science. 2007;318:626–9.
Maestre FT, Quero JL, Gotelli NJ, Escudero A, Ochoa V, Delgado-Baquerizo M, et al. Plant species richness and ecosystem multifunctionality in global drylands. Science. 2012;335:214–8.
Delgado-Baquerizo M, Maestre FT, Reich PB, Jeffries TC, Gaitan JJ, Encinar D, et al. Microbial diversity drives multifunctionality in terrestrial ecosystems. Nat Commun. 2016;7:10541.
Fanin N, Gundale MJ, Farrell M, Ciobanu M, Baldock JA, Nilsson MC, et al. Consistent effects of biodiversity loss on multifunctionality across contrasting ecosystems. Nat Ecol Evol. 2018;2:269–78.
Garland G, Banerjee S, Edlinger A, Oliveira EM, Herzog C, Wittwer R, et al. A closer look at the functions behind ecosystem multifunctionality: a review. J Ecol. 2020, https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.13511.
Bardgett RD, Van Der Putten WH. Belowground biodiversity and ecosystem functioning. Nature. 2014;515:505–11.
Fierer N. Embracing the unknown: disentangling the complexities of the soil microbiome. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2017;15:579–90.
Wall H, Nielsen UN, Six J. Soil biodiversity and human health. Nature. 2015;528:69–76.
Saleem M, Hu J, Jousset A. More than the sum of its parts: microbiome biodiversity as a driver of plant growth and soil health. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 2019;50:145–68.
Crowther TW, Van Den Hoogen J, Wan J, Mayes MA, Keiser AD, Mo L, et al. The global soil community and its influence on biogeochemistry. Science. 2019;365:eaav0550.
de Vries FT, Griffiths RI, Bailey M, Craig H, Girlanda M, Gweon HS, et al. Soil bacterial networks are less stable under drought than fungal networks. Nat Commun. 2018;9:3033.
Zhou J, Deng Y, Luo F, He Z, Yang Y. Phylogenetic molecular ecological network of soil microbial communities in response to elevated CO2. MBio. 2011;2:e00122–11.
Bragazza L, Parisod J, Buttler A, Bardgett RD. Biogeochemical plant–soil microbe feedback in response to climate warming in peatlands. Nat Clim Change. 2013;3:273–7.
Crowther TW, Thomas SM, Maynard DS, Baldrian P, Covey K, Frey SD, et al. Biotic interactions mediate soil microbial feedbacks to climate change. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2015;112:7033–8.
Maestre FT, Delgado-Baquerizo M, Jeffries TC, Eldridge DJ, Ochoa V, Gozalo B, et al. Increasing aridity reduces soil microbial diversity and abundance in global drylands. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2015;112:15684–9.
Guo X, Feng J, Shi Z, Zhou X, Yuan M, Tao X, et al. Climate warming leads to divergent succession of grassland microbial communities. Nat Clim Change. 2018;8:813–8.
Li Z, Tian D, Wang B, Wang J, Wang S, Chen H, et al. Microbes drive global soil nitrogen mineralization and availability. Glob Change Biol. 2019;25:1078–88.
Wieder WR, Bonan GB, Allison SD. Global soil carbon projections are improved by modelling microbial processes. Nat Clim Change. 2013;3:909–12.
Chen Q, Dong J, Zhu D, Hu H, Delgado-Baquerizo M, Ma Y, et al. Rare microbial taxa as the major drivers of ecosystem multifunctionality in long-term fertilized soils. Soil Biol Biochem. 2020;141:107686.
Delgado-Baquerizo M, Reich PB, Trivedi C, Eldridge DJ, Abades S, Alfaro FD, et al. Multiple elements of soil biodiversity drive ecosystem functions across biomes. Nat Ecol Evol. 2020;4:210–20.
Wagg C, Schlaeppi K, Banerjee S, Kuramae EE, Van Der Heijden MGA. Fungal-bacterial diversity and microbiome complexity predict ecosystem functioning. Nat Commun. 2019;10:4841.
Van der Heijden MGA, Bardgett RD, Van Straalen NM. The unseen majority: Soil microbes as drivers of plant diversity and productivity in terrestrial ecosystems. Ecol Lett. 2008;11:296–310.
Barberán A, Bates ST, Casamayor EO, Fierer N. Using network analysis to explore co-occurrence patterns in soil microbial communities. ISME J. 2012;6:343–51.
Banerjee S, Walder F, Büchi L, Meyer M, Held AY, Gattinger A, et al. Agricultural intensification reduces microbial network complexity and the abundance of keystone taxa in roots. ISME J. 2019;13:1722–36.
Freilich MA, Wieters E, Broitman BR, Marquet PA, Navarrete SA. Species co-occurrence networks: Can they reveal trophic and non-trophic interactions in ecological communities? Ecology. 2018;99:690–9.
Fuhrman JA. Microbial community structure and its functional implications. Nature. 2009;459:193–9.
Banerjee S, Schlaeppi K, Van Der Heijden MGA. Keystone taxa as drivers of microbiome structure and functioning. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2018;16:567–76.
Herren CM, McMahon KD. Keystone taxa predict compositional change in microbial communities. Environ Microbiol. 2018;20:2207–17.
Ochoa-Hueso R, Collins SL, Delgado-Baquerizo M, Hamonts K, Pockman WT, Sinsabaugh RL, et al. Drought consistently alters the composition of soil fungal and bacterial communities in grasslands from two continents. Glob Change Biol. 2018;24:2818–27.
Mabuhay JA, Nakagoshi N, Isagi Y. Influence of erosion on soil microbial biomass, abundance and community diversity. Land Degrad Dev. 2004;15:183–95.
Li Z, Xiao H, Tang Z, Huang J, Nie X, Huang B, et al. Microbial responses to erosion-induced soil physico-chemical property changes in the hilly red soil region of southern China. Eur J Soil Biol. 2015;71:37–44.
Hou S, Xin M, Wang LL, Jiang H, Li N, Wang Z. The effects of erosion on the microbial populations and enzyme activity in black soil of northeastern China. Acta Ecologica Sin. 2014;34:295–301.
Zhang Y, Wu Y, Liu B, Zheng Q, Yin J. Characteristics and factors controlling the development of ephemeral gullies in cultivated catchments of black soil region, Northeast China. Soil Res. 2007;96:28–41.
Li H, Zhu H, Qiu L, Wei X, Liu B, Shao M. Response of soil OC, N and P to land-use change and erosion in the black soil region of the Northeast China. Agr Ecosyst Environ. 2020;302:107081.
Zheng F. Effect of vegetation changes on soil erosion on the Loess Plateau. Pedosphere 2006;16:420–7.
Page A, Miller R, Keeney D. Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 2. Chemical and Microbiological Properties. Madison, Wisconsin, American Society of Agronomy, Inc., Soil Science Society of America, Inc, 1982.
Brookes P, Landman A, Pruden G, Jenkinson D. Chloroform fumigation and the release of soil nitrogen: a rapid direct extraction method to measure microbial biomass nitrogen in soil. Soil Biol Biochem. 1985;17:837–42.
Lefcheck JS, Byrnes JEK, Isbell F, Gamfeldt L, Griffin JN, Eisenhauer N, et al. Biodiversity enhances ecosystem multifunctionality across trophic levels and habitats. Nat Commun. 2015;6:6936.
Maestre FT, Castillo-Monroy AP, Bowker MA, Ochoa-Hueso R. Species richness effects on ecosystem multifunctionality depend on evenness, composition and spatial pattern. J Ecol. 2012;100:317–30.
Wang Z, Zhang Q, Staley C, Gao H, Ishii S, Wei X, et al. Impact of long-term grazing exclusion on soil microbial community composition and nutrient availability. Biol Fertil Soils. 2019;55:121–34.
Caporaso JG, Kuczynski J, Stombaugh J, Bittinger K, Bushman FD, Costello EK, et al. QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat Methods. 2010;7:335–6.
Mueller RC, Paula FS, Mirza BS, Rodrigues JLM, Nuesslein K, Bohannan BJM. Links between plant and fungal communities across a deforestation chronosequence in the Amazon rainforest. ISME J. 2014;8:1548–50.
Al-Ghalith GA, Hillmann B, Ang K, Shields-Cutler R, Knights D. SHI7 is a self-learning pipeline for multipurpose short-read DNA quality control. mSystems. 2018;3:e00202–17.
Al-Ghalith GA, Montassier E, Ward HN, Knights D. NINJA-OPS: fast accurate marker gene alignment using concatenated ribosomes. PLoS Comput Biol. 2016;12:e1004658.
Langmead B, Salzberg SL. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat Methods. 2012;9:357–9.
McDonald D, Price MN, Goodrich J, Nawrocki EP, DeSantis TZ, Probst A, et al. An improved Greengenes taxonomy with explicit ranks for ecological and evolutionary analyses of bacteria and archaea. ISME J. 2012;6:610–8.
Bray JR, Curtis JT. An ordination of the upland forest communities of southern Wisconsin. Ecol Monogr. 1957;27:326–49.
Anderson MJ, Willis TJ. Canonical analysis of principal coordinates: a useful method of constrained ordination for ecology. Ecology. 2003;84:511–25.
Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Kindt R, Legendre P, Minchin PR, O’Hara RB, et al. Vegan: community ecology package. R package version 2.3-1. 2015, http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan.
Langfelder P, Horvath S. WGCNA: an R package for weighted correlation network analysis. BMC Bioinforma. 2008;9:559.
Luo F, Zhong J, Yang Y, Scheuermann RH, Zhou J. Application of random matrix theory to biological networks. Phys Lett A. 2006;357:420–3.
Benjamini Y, Krieger AM, Yekutieli D. Adaptive linear step-up procedures that control the false discovery rate. Biometrika. 2006;93:491–507.
Csardi G, Nepusz T. The igraph software package for complex network research. InterJournal. Complex Syst. 2006;1695:1–9.
Ma B, Wang HZ, Dsouza M, Lou J, He Y, Dai ZM, et al. Geographic patterns of co-occurrence network topological features for soil microbiota at continental scale in eastern China. ISME J. 2016;10:1891–901.
Berry D, Widder S. Deciphering microbial interactions and detecting keystone species with co-occurrence networks. Front Microbiol. 2014;5:219.
Bastian M, Heymann S, Jacomy M. Gephi: an open source software for exploring and manipulating networks. ICWSM Conf. 2009;8:361–2.
Louca S, Parfrey LW, Doebeli M. Decoupling function and taxonomy in the global ocean microbiome. Science. 2016;353:1272–7.
Qiu L, Zhu H, Liu J, Yao Y, Wang X, Rong G, et al. Soil erosion significantly reduces organic carbon and nitrogen mineralization in a simulated experiment. Agr Ecosyst Environ. 2021;307:107232.
Crits-Christoph A, Robinson CK, Barnum T, Fricke WF, Davila AF, Jedynak B, et al. Colonization patterns of soil microbial communities in the Atacama Desert. Microbiome. 2013;1:28.
Tiemann LK, Billings SA. Changes in variability of soil moisture alter microbial community C and N resource use. Soil Biol Biochem. 2011;43:1837–47.
Banerjee S, Misra A, Sar A, Pal S, Chaudhury S, Dam B. Poor nutrient availability in opencast coalmine influences microbial community composition and diversity in exposed and underground soil profiles. Appl Soil Ecol. 2020;152:103544.
Abu-Hamdeh NH, Reeder RC. Soil thermal conductivity: effects of density, moisture, salt concentration, and organic matter. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 2000;64:1285–90.
Bajracharya RM, Lal R, Kimble JM. Diurnal and seasonal CO2-C flux from soil as related to erosion phases in central Ohio. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 2000;64:286–93.
Liang Y, Lal R, Guo S, Liu R, Hu Y. Impacts of simulated erosion and soil amendments on greenhouse gas fluxes and maize yield in Miamian soil of central Ohio. Sci Rep. 2018;8:520.
Van Der Voort M, Kempenaar M, Van Driel M, Raaijmakers JM, Mendes R. Impact of soil heat on reassembly of bacterial communities in the rhizosphere microbiome and plant disease suppression. Ecol Lett. 2016;19:375–82.
García-Palacios P, Vandegehuchte ML, Shaw EA, Dam M, Post KH, Ramirez KS, et al. Are there links between responses of soil microbes and ecosystem functioning to elevated CO2, N deposition and warming? A global perspective. Glob Change Biol. 2015;21:1590–1600.
Karimi B, Terrat S, Dequiedt S, Saby NPA, Horriguel W, Lelievre M, et al. Biogeography of soil bacteria and archaea across France. Sci Adv. 2018;4:eaat1808.
Janssen PH. Identifying the dominant soil bacterial taxa in libraries of 16S rRNA and 16S rRNA genes. Appl Environ Microb. 2006;72:1719–28.
Spain AM, Krumholz LR, Elshahed MS. Abundance, composition, diversity and novelty of soil Proteobacteria. ISME J. 2009;3:992–1000.
Zhang C, Liu G, Xue S, Wang G. Soil bacterial community dynamics reflect changes in plant community and soil properties during the secondary succession of abandoned farmland in the Loess Plateau. Soil Biol Biochem. 2016;97:40–49.
Wolińska A, Kuzniar A, Zielenkiewicz U, Izak D, Szafranek-Nakonieczna A, Banach A, et al. Bacteroidetes as a sensitive biological indicator of agricultural soil usage revealed by a culture-independent approach. Appl Soil Ecol. 2017;119:128–37.
DeBruyn LM, Nixon LT, Fawaz MN, Johnson AM, Radosevich M. Global biogeography and quantitative seasonal dynamics of gemmatimonadetes in soil. Appl Environ Microb. 2011;77:6295–6300.
Bouskill NJ, Lim HC, Borglin S, Salve R, Wood TE, Silver WL, et al. Pre-exposure to drought increases the resistance of tropical forest soil bacterial communities to extended drought. ISME J. 2013;7:384–94.
Naylor D, DeGraaf S, Purdom E, Coleman-Derr D. Drought and host selection influence bacterial community dynamics in the grass root microbiome. ISME J. 2017;11:2691–704.
Santos-Medellin C, Edwards J, Liechty Z, Nguyen B, Sundaresan V. Drought stress results in a compartment-specific restructuring of the rice root-associated microbiomes. mBio. 2017;8:e00764–17.
Chowdhury TR, Lee JY, Bottos EM, Brislawn CJ, White RA, Bramer LM, et al. Metaphenomic responses of a native prairie soil microbiome to moisture perturbations. mSystems. 2019;4:e00061–19.
Mickan BS, Abbott LK, Solaiman ZM, Mathes F, Siddique KHM, Jenkins SN. Soil disturbance and water stress interact to influence arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, rhizosphere bacteria and potential for N and C cycling in an agricultural soil. Biol Fert Soils. 2019;55:53–66.
Van Horn DJ, Okie JG, Buelow HN, Gooseff MN, Barrett JE, Takacs-Vesbach CD. Soil microbial responses to increased moisture and organic resources along a salinity gradient in a polar desert. Appl Environ Microb. 2014;80:3034–43.
Kielak A, Pijl AS, Van Veen JA, Kowalchuk GA. Phylogenetic diversity of Acidobacteria in a former agricultural soil. ISME J. 2009;3:378–82.
Fierer N, Lauber CL, Ramirez KS, Zaneveld J, Bradford MA, Knight R. Comparative metagenomic, phylogenetic and physiological analyses of soil microbial communities across nitrogen gradients. ISME J. 2012;6:1007–17.
Wolińska A, Kuzniar A, Zielenkiewicz U, Banach A, Blaszczyk M. Indicators of arable soils fatigue Bacterial - families and genera: a metagenomic approach. Ecol Indic. 2018;93:490–500.
Yang F, Niu KC, Collins CG, Yan XB, Ji YG, Ling N. Grazing practices affect the soil microbial community composition in a Tibetan alpine meadow. Land Degrad Dev. 2019;30:49–59.
Vitousek PM, Menge DNL, Reed SC, Cleveland CC. Biological nitrogen fixation: rates, patterns and ecological controls in terrestrial ecosystems. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci. 2013;368:1621.
Fan KK, Delgado-Baquerizo M, Guo XS, Wang DZ, Wu YY, Zhu M, et al. Suppressed N fixation and diazotrophs after four decades of fertilization. Microbiome. 2019;7:143.
Ryu MH, Zhang J, Toth T, Khokhani D, Geddes BA, Mus F, et al. Control of nitrogen fixation in bacteria that associate with cereals. Nat Microbiol. 2020;5:314–30.
Banerjee S, Kirkby CA, Schmutter D, Bissett A, Kirkegaard JA, Richardson AE. Network analysis reveals functional redundancy and keystone taxa amongst bacterial and fungal communities during organic matter decomposition in an arable soil. Soil Biol Biochem. 2016;97:188–98.
Guo J, Ling N, Chen Z, Xue C, Li L, Liu L, et al. Soil fungal assemblage complexity is dependent on soil fertility and dominated by deterministic processes. N Phytol. 2020;226:232–43.
Qi G, Ma G, Chen S, Lin C, Zhao X. Microbial network and soil properties are changed in bacterial wilt-susceptible soil. Appl Environ Microb. 2019;85:e00162–19.
Xue L, Ren H, Brodribb TJ, Wang J, Yao X, Li S. Long term effects of management practice intensification on soil microbial community structure and co-occurrence network in a non-timber plantation. For Ecol Manag. 2020;459:117805.
Ling N, Zhu C, Xue C, Chen H, Duan YH, Peng C. Insight into how organic amendments can shape the soil microbiome in long-term field experiments as revealed by network analysis. Soil Biol Biochem 2016;99:137–49.
Deng Y, Jiang YH, Yang YF, He ZL, Luo F, Zhou JZ. Molecular ecological network analyses. BMC Bioinforma. 2012;13:113.
Bai YX, She WW, Miao L, Qin SG, Zhang YQ. Soil microbial interactions modulate the effect of Artemisia ordosica on herbaceous species in a desert ecosystem, northern China. Soil Biol Biochem. 2020;150:108013.
Szoboszlay M, Dohrmann AB, Poeplau C, Don A, Tebbe CC. Impact of land-use change and soil organic carbon quality on microbial diversity in soils across Europe. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2017;93:fix146.
Marcos MS, Bertiller MB, Olivera NL. Microbial community composition and network analyses in arid soils of the Patagonian Monte under grazing disturbance reveal an important response of the community to soil particle size. Appl Soil Ecol. 2019;138:223–32.
Hamamura N, Olson SH, Ward DM, Inskeep WP. Microbial population dynamics associated with crude-oil biodegradation in diverse soils. Appl Environ Microb. 2006;72:6316–24.
Acosta‐Martínez V, Cotton J, Gardner T, Moore‐Kucera J, Zak J, Wester D, et al. Predominant bacterial and fungal assemblages in agricultural soils during a record drought/heat wave and linkages to enzyme activities of biogeochemical cycling. Appl Soil Ecol. 2014;84:69–82.
Peng M, Jia H, Wang Q. The effect of land use on bacterial communities in Saline-Alkali soil. Curr Microbiol. 2017;74:325–33.
Navarrete AA, Tsai SM, Mendes LW, Faust K, de Hollander M, Cassman NA, et al. Soil microbiome responses to the short-term effects of Amazonian deforestation. Mol Ecol. 2015;24:2433–48.
Byers AK, Condron L, Donavan T, O’Callaghan M, Patuawa T, Waipara N, et al. Soil microbial diversity in adjacent forest systems—contrasting native, old growth kauri (Agathis australis) forest with exotic pine (Pinus radiata) plantation forest. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2020;96:fiaa047.
Schmidt MWI, Torn MS, Abiven S, Dittmar T, Guggenberger G, Janssens IA, et al. Trumbore, Persistence of soil organic matter as an ecosystem property. Nature. 2011;478:49–56.
Lehmann J, Kleber M. The contentious nature of soil organic matter. Nature. 2015;528:60–68.
Buzzard V, Michaletz ST, Deng Y, He Z, Ning D, Shen L, et al. Continental scale structuring of forest and soil diversity via functional traits. Nat Ecol Evol. 2019;3:1298–308.
Wei X, Shao M, Gale W, Li L. Global pattern of soil carbon losses due to the conversion of forests to agricultural land. Sci Rep. 2014;4:4062.
Delgado‐Baquerizo M, Reith F, Dennis PG, Hamonts K, Powell JR, Young A, et al. Ecological drivers of soil microbial diversity and soil biological networks in the Southern Hemisphere. Ecology. 2018;99:583–96.
Delgado-Baquerizo M, Oliverio AM, Brewer TE, Benavent-González A, Eldridge DJ, Bardgett RD, et al. A global atlas of the dominant bacteria found in soil. Science. 2018;359:320–5.
Nottingham AT, Fierer N, Turner BL, Whitaker J, Ostle NJ, McNamara NP, et al. Microbes follow Humboldt: temperature drives plant and soil microbial diversity patterns from the Amazon to the Andes. Ecology. 2018;99:2455–66.
Zhou J, Deng Y, Shen L, Wen C, Yan Q, Ning D, et al. Temperature mediates continental-scale diversity of microbes in forest soils. Nat Commun. 2016;7:12083.
Allison SD, Martiny JBH, et al. Resistance resilience, and redundancy in microbial communities. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105:11512–9.
Hartmann M, Niklaus PA, Zimmermann S, Schmutz S, Kremer J, Abarenkov K, et al. Resistance and resilience of the forest soil microbiome to logging-associated compaction. ISME J. 2014;8:226–44.
Acknowledgements
We thank Prof. Fenli Zheng from Northwest A&F University and Prof. Yun Xie from Beijing Normal University for the help with sampling, and Weibo Kong and Yufei Yao for the help with statistical analysis. This study was supported, in part, by the Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (XDB40020000 and XDA23070202), the National Key Research and Development Program (2018YFC0507001 and 2016YFC0500704), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41977068 and 41622105), programs from Chinese Academy of Sciences (QYZDB-SSW-DQC039), and the Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station (to M.J.S. and Q.Z.).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
LQ and XW conceived this project. HZ, HL, and XW processed the soil samples and collected data. QZ conducted the bioinformatics analyses. LQ and XW wrote the first draft of the manuscript and QZ, PBR, SB, MGAH, MJS, and SI contributed to subsequent revisions. All authors contributed to the final written product.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Qiu, L., Zhang, Q., Zhu, H. et al. Erosion reduces soil microbial diversity, network complexity and multifunctionality. ISME J 15, 2474–2489 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41396-021-00913-1
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41396-021-00913-1
This article is cited by
-
Short-term restoration practices change the bacterial community in degraded soil from the Brazilian semiarid
Scientific Reports (2024)
-
Erosion and deposition significantly affect the microbial diversity, co-occurrence network, and multifunctionality in agricultural soils of Northeast China
Journal of Soils and Sediments (2024)
-
Green manuring relocates microbiomes in driving the soil functionality of nitrogen cycling to obtain preferable grain yields in thirty years
Science China Life Sciences (2024)
-
Soil microbial diversity plays an important role in resisting and restoring degraded ecosystems
Plant and Soil (2024)
-
Temporal dynamics of plant−soil feedback and related mechanisms depend on environmental context during invasion processes of a subtropical invader
Plant and Soil (2024)