Article | Published:

The cost of toxin production in phytoplankton: the case of PST producing dinoflagellates

The ISME Journalvolume 13pages6475 (2019) | Download Citation

Abstract

Many species of phytoplankton produce toxins that may provide protection from grazing. In that case one would expect toxin production to be costly; else all species would evolve toxicity. However, experiments have consistently failed to show any costs. Here, we show that costs of toxin production are environment dependent but can be high. We develop a fitness optimization model to estimate rate, costs, and benefits of toxin production, using PST (paralytic shellfish toxin) producing dinoflagellates as an example. Costs include energy and material (nitrogen) costs estimated from well-established biochemistry of PSTs, and benefits are estimated from relationship between toxin content and grazing mortality. The model reproduces all known features of PST production: inducibility in the presence of grazer cues, low toxicity of nitrogen-starved cells, but high toxicity of P-limited and light-limited cells. The model predicts negligible reduction in cell division rate in nitrogen replete cells, consistent with observations, but >20% reduction when nitrogen is limiting and abundance of grazers high. Such situation is characteristic of coastal and oceanic waters during summer when blooms of toxic algae typically develop. The investment in defense is warranted, since the net growth rate is always higher in defended than in undefended cells.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    Blossom HE, Andersen NG, Rasmussen SA, Hansen PJ. Stability of the intra- and extracellular toxins of Prymnesium parvum using a microalgal bioassay. Harmful Algae. 2014;32:11–21.

  2. 2.

    Legrand C, Rengefors K, Fistarol GO, Granéli E. Allelopathy in phytoplankton-biochemical, ecological and evolutionary aspects. Phycologia. 2003;42:406–19.

  3. 3.

    John U, Tillmann U, Hülskötter J, Alpermann TJ, Wohlrab S, Van De Waal DB. Intraspecific facilitation by allelochemical mediated grazing protection within a toxigenic dinoflagellate population. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci. 2015;282:1–9.

  4. 4.

    Turner JT. Planktonic marine copepods and harmful algae. Harmful Algae. 2014;32:81–93.

  5. 5.

    Colin SP, Dam HG. Effects of the toxic dinoflagellate Alexandrium fundyense on the copepod Acartia hudsonica: a test of the mechanisms that reduce ingestion rates. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 2003;248:55–65.

  6. 6.

    Driscoll WW, Hackett JD, Ferrière R. Eco-evolutionary feedbacks between private and public goods: evidence from toxic algal blooms. Ecol Lett. 2016;19:81–97.

  7. 7.

    Blossom HE, Daugbjerg N, Hansen PJ. Toxic mucus traps: a novel mechanism that mediates prey uptake in the mixotrophic dinoflagellate Alexandrium pseudogonyaulax. Harmful Algae. 2012;17:40–53.

  8. 8.

    Sheng J, Malkiel E, Katz J, Adolf JE, Place AR. A dinoflagellate exploits toxins to immobilize prey prior to ingestion. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2010;107:2082–7.

  9. 9.

    Wolfe GV. The chemical defense ecology of marine unicellular plankton: constraints, mechanisms, and impacts. Biol Bull. 2000;198:225–44.

  10. 10.

    Xu J, Nielsen LT, Kiørboe T. Foraging response and acclimation of ambush feeding and feeding-current feeding copepods to toxic dinoflagellates. Limnol Oceanogr. 2018; in press, https://doi.org/10.1002/lno.10782.

  11. 11.

    Xu J, Hansen JP, Nielsen TL, Krock B, Tillmann U, Kiørboe T. Distinctly different behavioral responses of a copepod, Temora longicornis, to different strains of toxic dinoflagellates, Alexandrium spp. Harmful Algae. 2017;62:1–9.

  12. 12.

    Teegarden GJ, Cembella AD. Grazing of toxic dinoflagellates, Alexandrium spp, by adult copepods of coastal Maine: Implications for the fate of paralytic shellfish toxins in marine food webs. J Exp Mar Bio Ecol. 1996;196:145–76.

  13. 13.

    Selander E, Thor P, Toth G, Pavia H. Copepods induce paralytic shellfish toxin production in marine dinoflagellates. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci. 2006;273:1673–80.

  14. 14.

    Schultz M, Kiørboe T. Active prey selection in two pelagic copepods feeding on potentially toxic and non-toxic dinoflagellates. J Plankton Res. 2009;31:553–61.

  15. 15.

    Sykes PF, Huntley ME. Acute physiological reactions of Calanus pacificus to selected dinoflagellates: Direct observations. Mar Biol. 1987;94:19–24.

  16. 16.

    Selander E, Fagerberg T, Wohlrab S, Pavia H. Fight and flight in dinoflagellates? Kinetics of simultaneous grazer-induced responses in Alexandrium tamarense. Limnol Oceanogr. 2012;57:58–64.

  17. 17.

    Senft-Batoh CD, Dam HG, Shumway SE, Wikfors GH. A multi-phylum study of grazer-induced paralytic shellfish toxin production in the dinoflagellate Alexandrium fundyense: a new perspective on control of algal toxicity. Harmful Algae. 2015;44:20–31.

  18. 18.

    Harðardóttir S, Pančić M, Tammilehto A, Krock B, Møller EF, Nielsen TG, et al. Dangerous relations in the Arctic marine food web: Interactions between toxin producing Pseudo-nitzschia diatoms and Calanus copepodites. Mar Drugs. 2015;13:3809–35.

  19. 19.

    Karban R. The ecology and evolution of induced resistance against herbivores. Funct Ecol. 2011;25:339–47.

  20. 20.

    John EH, Flynn KJ. Modelling changes in paralytic shellfish toxin content of dionoflagellates in response to nitrogen and phosphorus supply. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 2002;225:116–47.

  21. 21.

    Thingstad TF, Våge S, Storesund JE, Sandaa R-A, Giske J. A theoretical analysis of how strain-specific viruses can control microbial species diversity. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2014;111:7813–8.

  22. 22.

    Våge S, Storesund JE, Giske J, Thingstad TF. Optimal defense strategies in an idealized microbial food web under trade-off between competition and defense. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e101415.

  23. 23.

    Strauss SY, Rudgers JA, Lau JA, Irwin RE. Direct and ecological costs of resistance to herbivory. Trends Ecol Evol. 2002;17:278–85.

  24. 24.

    Leibold MA, Hall SR, Smith VH, Lytle DA. Herbivory enhances the diversity of primary producers in pond ecosystems. Ecology. 2017;98:48–56.

  25. 25.

    Anderson DM, Kulis DM, J. J. S, Hall S, Lee C. Dynamics and physiology of saxitoxin production by the dinoflagellate Alexandrium spp. Mar Biol. 1990;104:511–24.

  26. 26.

    John EH, Flynn KJ. Growth dynamics and toxicity of Alexandrium fundyense (Dinophyceae): The effect of changing N:P supply ratios on internal toxin and nutrient levels. Eur J Phycol. 2000;35:11–23.

  27. 27.

    Berge T, Chakraborty S, Hansen PJ, Andersen KH. Modeling succession of key resource-harvesting traits of mixotrophic plankton. ISME J. 2017;11:212–23.

  28. 28.

    López-Sandoval DC, Rodríguez-Ramos T, Cermeño P, Sobrino C, Marañón E. Photosynthesis and respiration in marine phytoplankton: Relationship with cell size, taxonomic affiliation, and growth phase. J Exp Mar Bio Ecol. 2014;457:151–9.

  29. 29.

    Frangoulis C, Carlotti F, Eisenhauer L, Zervoudaki S. Converting copepod vital rates into units appropriate for biogeochemical models. Prog Oceanogr. 2010;84:43–51.

  30. 30.

    Kellmann R, Mihali TK, Young JJ, Pickford R, Pomati F, Neilan BA. Biosynthetic intermediate analysis and functional homology reveal a saxitoxin gene cluster in cyanobacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008;74:4044–53.

  31. 31.

    Atkinson DE. Cellular Energy Metabolism and Its Regulation. Academic Press, New York, 1977.

  32. 32.

    Kiørboe T, Møhlenberg F, Hamburger K. Bioenergetics of the planktonic copepod Acartia tonsa: relation between feeding, egg production and respiration, and composition of specific dynamic action. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 1985;26:85–97.

  33. 33.

    Saiz E, Kiørboe T. Predatory and suspension feeding of the copepod Acartia tonsa in turbulent environments. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 1995;122:147–58.

  34. 34.

    Boyer GL, Sullivan JJ, Andersen RJ, Harrison PJ, Taylor FJR. Effects of nutrient limitation on toxin production and composition in the marine dinoflagellate Protogonyaulax tamarensis. Mar Biol. 1987;128:123–8.

  35. 35.

    Han M, Lee H, Anderson DM, Kim B. Paralytic shellfish toxin production by the dinoflagellate Alexandrium pacificum (Chinhae Bay, Korea) in axenic, nutrient-limited chemostat cultures and nutrient-enriched batch cultures. Mar Pollut Bull. 2016;104:34–43.

  36. 36.

    Murata A, Nagashima Y, Taguchi S. N:P ratios controlling the growth of the marine dinoflagellate Alexandrium tamarense: Content and composition of paralytic shellfish poison. Harmful Algae. 2012;20:11–8.

  37. 37.

    Ogata T, Ishimura T, Kodama M. Effect of water temperature and light intensity on growth rate and toxicity change in Protogonyaulax tamarensis. Mar Biol. 1987;95:217–20.

  38. 38.

    Zhu X, Wang J, Chen Q, Chen G, Huang Y, Yang Z. Costs and trade-offs of grazer-induced defenses in Scenedesmus under deficient resource. Sci Rep. 2016;6:1–10.

  39. 39.

    Yoshida T, Hairston NG, Ellner SP. Evolutionary trade-off between defence against grazing and competitive ability in a simple unicellular alga, Chlorelia vulgaris. Proc R Soc B-Biol Sci. 2004;271:1947–53.

  40. 40.

    Yoshida T, Jones LE, Ellner SP, Fussmann GF, Hairston NG. Rapid evolution drives ecological dynamics in a predator–prey system. Nature. 2003;424:303–6.

  41. 41.

    Kiørboe T, Nielsen TG. Regulation of zooplankton biomass and production in a temperate, coastal ecosystem. 1. Copepods. Limnol Ocean. 1994;39:493–507.

  42. 42.

    Andersson L. Trends in nutrient and oxygen concentrations in the Skagerrak-Kattegat. J Sea Res. 1996;35:63–71.

  43. 43.

    Brockmann UW, Topcu DH. Nutrient atlas of the central and northern North Sea. Federal Environmental Agency, Berlin, Germany. 2002.

  44. 44.

    Teegarden GJ. Copepod grazing selection and particle discrimination on the basis of PSP toxin content. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 1999;181:163–76.

  45. 45.

    Heisler J, Glibert PM, Burkholder JM, Anderson DM, Cochlan W, Dennison WC, et al. Eutrophication and harmful algal blooms: A scientific consensus. Harmful Algae. 2008;8:3–13.

  46. 46.

    Hallegraeff GM. A review of harmful algal blooms and their apparent global increase. Phycologia. 1993;32:79–99.

  47. 47.

    Gilbert JJ. Differential effects of Anabaena affinis on Cladocerans and Rotifers: mechanisms and implications. Ecology. 1990;71:1727–40.

  48. 48.

    Colin SP, Dam HG. Latitudinal differentiation in the effects of the toxic dinoflagellate Alexandrium spp. on the feeding and reproduction of populations of the copepod Acartia hudsonica. Harmful Algae. 2002;1:113–25.

  49. 49.

    Pančić M, Kiørboe T. Phytoplankton defence mechanisms: traits and trade-offs. Biol Rev. 2018;93:1269–303.

  50. 50.

    Redfield AC. The biological control of chemical factors in the environment. Am Sci. 1958;46:205–21. Sigma Xi, The Scientific Research HonorSociety.

  51. 51.

    Chang FH, McClean M. Growth responses of Alexandrium minutum (Dinophyceae) as a function of three different nitrogen sources and irradiance. New Zeal J Mar Freshw Res. 1997;31:1–7.

  52. 52.

    Ignatiades L, Gotsis-Skretas O, Metaxatos A. Field and culture studies on the ecophysiology of the toxic dinoflagellate Alexandrium minutum (Halim) present in Greek coastal waters. Harmful Algae. 2007;6:153–65.

  53. 53.

    Lim PT, Leaw CP, Usup G, Kobiyama A, Koike K, Ogata T. Effects of light and temperature on growth, nitrate uptake, and toxin production of two tropical dinoflagellates: Alexandrium tamiyavanichii and Alexandrium minutum (Dinophyceae). J Phycol. 2006;42:786–99.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The Centre for Ocean Life is supported by the Villum Foundation. S.C. was supported by the H. C. Ørsted COFUND postdoc fellowship and additional support was received from the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation through award #5479.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Centre for Ocean Life, DTU Aqua, Technical University of Denmark, Kemitorvet, Kgs.2800, Lyngby, Denmark

    • Subhendu Chakraborty
    • , Marina Pančić
    • , Ken H. Andersen
    •  & Thomas Kiørboe

Authors

  1. Search for Subhendu Chakraborty in:

  2. Search for Marina Pančić in:

  3. Search for Ken H. Andersen in:

  4. Search for Thomas Kiørboe in:

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Subhendu Chakraborty.

Electronic supplementary material

About this article

Publication history

Received

Revised

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41396-018-0250-6