Comparative genomic inference suggests mixotrophic lifestyle for Thorarchaeota

  • The ISME Journalvolume 12pages10211031 (2018)
  • doi:10.1038/s41396-018-0060-x
  • Download Citation
Published online:


Thorarchaeota are a new archaeal phylum within the Asgard superphylum, whose ancestors have been proposed to play possible ecological roles in cellular evolution. However, little is known about the lifestyles of these uncultured archaea. To provide a better resolution of the ecological roles and metabolic capacity of Thorarchaeota, we obtained Thorarchaeota genomes reconstructed from metagenomes of different depth layers in mangrove and mudflat sediments. These genomes from deep anoxic layers suggest the presence of Thorarchaeota with the potential to degrade organic matter, fix inorganic carbon, reduce sulfur/sulfate and produce acetate. In particular, Thorarchaeota may be involved in ethanol production, nitrogen fixation, nitrite reduction, and arsenic detoxification. Interestingly, these Thorarchaeotal genomes are inferred to contain the tetrahydromethanopterin and tetrahydrofolate Wood–Ljungdahl (WL) pathways for CO2 reduction, and the latter WL pathway appears to have originated from bacteria. These archaea are predicted to be able to use various inorganic and organic carbon sources, possessing genes inferred to encode ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase-like proteins (normally without RuBisCO activity) and a near-complete Calvin–Benson–Bassham cycle. The existence of eukaryotic selenocysteine insertion sequences and many genes for proteins previously considered eukaryote-specific in Thorarchaeota genomes provide new insights into their evolutionary roles in the origin of eukaryotic cellular complexity. Resolving the metabolic capacities of these enigmatic archaea and their origins will enhance our understanding of the origins of eukaryotes and their roles in ecosystems.

  • Subscribe to The ISME Journal for full access:



Additional access options:

Already a subscriber?  Log in  now or  Register  for online access.


  1. 1.

    Zaremba-Niedzwiedzka K, Caceres EF, Saw JH, B ckstr m D, Juzokaite L, Vancaester E, et al. Asgard archaea illuminate the origin of eukaryotic cellular complexity. Nature. 2017;541:353–8.

  2. 2.

    Seitz KW, Lazar CS, Hinrichs K-U, Teske AP, Baker BJ. Genomic reconstruction of a novel, deeply branched sediment archaeal phylum with pathways for acetogenesis and sulfur reduction. ISME J. 2016;10:1696–705.

  3. 3.

    Zhou Z, Meng H, Liu Y, Gu J-D, Li M. Stratified bacterial and archaeal community in mangrove and intertidal wetland mudflats revealed by high throughput 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Front Microbiol. 2017;8:2148.

  4. 4.

    Peng Y, Leung HCM, Yiu SM, Chin FYL. IDBA-UD: a de novo assembler for single-cell and metagenomic sequencing data with highly uneven depth. Bioinformatics. 2012;28:1420–8.

  5. 5.

    Dick GJ, Andersson AF, Baker BJ, Simmons SL, Thomas BC, Yelton AP, et al. Community-wide analysis of microbial genome sequence signatures. Genome Biol. 2009;10:R85.

  6. 6.

    Wu Y-W, Simmons BA, Singer SW. MaxBin 2.0: an automated binning algorithm to recover genomes from multiple metagenomic datasets. Bioinformatics. 2016;32:605–7.

  7. 7.

    Parks DH, Imelfort M, Skennerton CT, Hugenholtz P, Tyson GW. CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res. 2015;25:1043–55.

  8. 8.

    Hyatt D, Chen G-L, LoCascio PF, Land ML, Larimer FW, Hauser LJ. Prodigal: prokaryotic gene recognition and translation initiation site identification. BMC Bioinformatics. 2010;11:119.

  9. 9.

    Kanehisa M, Sato Y, Morishima K. BlastKOALA and GhostKOALA: KEGG tools for functional characterization of genome and metagenome sequences. J Mol Biol. 2016;428:726–31.

  10. 10.

    Jones P, Binns D, Chang HY, Fraser M, Li W, McAnulla C, et al. InterProScan 5: genome-scale protein function classification. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:1236–40.

  11. 11.

    Huerta-Cepas J, Forslund K, Coelho LP, Szklarczyk D, Jensen LJ, Mering von C, et al. Fast genome-wide functional annotation through orthology assignment by eggNOG-Mapper. Mol Biol Evol. 2017; 34:2115-22.

  12. 12.

    Bagos PG, Tsirigos KD, Plessas SK, Liakopoulos TD, Hamodrakas SJ. Prediction of signal peptides in archaea. Protein Eng Des Sel. 2008;22:27–35.

  13. 13.

    Yu NY, Wagner JR, Laird MR, Melli G, Rey S, Lo R, et al. PSORTb 3.0: improved protein subcellular localization prediction with refined localization subcategories and predictive capabilities for all prokaryotes. Bioinformatics. 2010;26:1608–15.

  14. 14.

    Yin Y, Mao X, Yang J, Chen X, Mao F, Xu Y. dbCAN: a web resource for automated carbohydrate-active enzyme annotation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40:W445–W451.

  15. 15.

    Mariotti M, Lobanov AV, Guigó R, Gladyshev VN. SECISearch3 and Seblastian: new tools for prediction of SECIS elements and selenoproteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41:e149.

  16. 16.

    Santesmasses D, Mariotti M, Guigó R. Computational identification of the selenocysteine tRNA (tRNASec) in genomes Gough J (ed). PLoS Comput Biol. 2017;13:e1005383.

  17. 17.

    Katoh K, Standley DM. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Mol Biol Evol. 2013;30:772–80.

  18. 18.

    Criscuolo A, Gribaldo S. BMGE (Block Mapping and Gathering with Entropy): a new software for selection of phylogenetic informative regions from multiple sequence alignments. BMC Evol Biol. 2010;10:210.

  19. 19.

    Minh BQ, Nguyen MAT, Haeseler von A. Ultrafast approximation for phylogenetic bootstrap. Mol Biol Evol. 2013;30:1188–95.

  20. 20.

    Nguyen L-T, Schmidt HA, Haeseler von A, Minh BQ. IQ-TREE: a fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies. Mol Biol Evol. 2014;32:268–74.

  21. 21.

    Susko E, Roger AJ. On reduced amino acid alphabets for phylogenetic inference. Mol Biol Evol. 2007;24:2139–50.

  22. 22.

    Guindon SP, Dufayard J-FO, Lefort V, Anisimova M, Hordijk W, Gascuel O. New algorithms and methods to estimate maximum-likelihood phylogenies: assessing the performance of PhyML 3.0. Syst Biol. 2010;59:307–21.

  23. 23.

    Eren AM, Esen ÖC, Quince C, Vineis JH, Morrison HG, Sogin ML, et al. Anvi’o: an advanced analysis and visualization platform for ‘omics data. PeerJ. 2015;3:e1319.

  24. 24.

    Wang Y, Coleman-Derr D, Chen G, Gu YQ. OrthoVenn: a web server for genome wide comparison and annotation of orthologous clusters across multiple species. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43:W78–W84.

  25. 25.

    Ouk Kim Y, Chun J, Lee I, Park S-C. OrthoANI: an improved algorithm and software for calculating average nucleotide identity. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2016;66:1100–3.

  26. 26.

    Alongi DM. Carbon cycling and storage in Mangrove Forests. Annu Rev Mar Sci. 2014;6:195–219.

  27. 27.

    Bhattacharyya A, Majumder NS, Basak P, Mukherji S, Roy D, Nag S, et al. Diversity and distribution of archaea in the Mangrove sediment of Sundarbans. Archaea. 2015;2015:1–14.

  28. 28.

    Yan B, Hong K, Yu ZN. Archaeal communities in mangrove soil characterized by 16S rRNA gene clones. J Microbiol. 2006;44:566–71.

  29. 29.

    Li R, Chai M, Qiu GY. Distribution, fraction, and ecological assessment of heavy metals in sediment-plant system in Mangrove Forest, South China Sea. PLoS ONE. 2016a;11:e0147308.

  30. 30.

    Li R, Xu H, Chai M, Qiu GY. Distribution and accumulation of mercury and copper in mangrove sediments in Shenzhen, the world’s most rapid urbanized city. Environ Monit Assess. 2016b;188:87.

  31. 31.

    Liang Y, Wong MH. Spatial and temporal organic and heavy metal pollution at Mai Po Marshes Nature Reserve, Hong Kong. Chemosphere. 2003;52:1647–58.

  32. 32.

    Cai L, Lin J, Li H. Macroinfauna communities in an organic-rich mudflat at Shenzhen and Hong Kong, China. Bull Mar Sci. 2001;69:1129–38.

  33. 33.

    Luo L, Gu J-D. Influence of macrofaunal burrows on extracellular enzyme activity and microbial abundance in subtropical mangrove sediment. Microb Ecol. 2016;52:1807–10.

  34. 34.

    van Dongen S, Abreu-Goodger C. Using MCL to extract clusters from networks. Methods Mol Biol. 2012;804:281–95.

  35. 35.

    Bonangelino CJ. Genomic screen for vacuolar protein sorting genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Biol Cell. 2002;13:2486–501.

  36. 36.

    Wiederhold E, Gandhi T, Permentier HP, Breitling R, Poolman B, Slotboom DJ. The yeast vacuolar membrane proteome. Mol Cell Proteom. 2008;8:380–92.

  37. 37.

    Herzberg O, Chen CCH, Liu S, Tempczyk A, Howard A, Wei M, et al. Pyruvate site of pyruvate phosphate dikinase: crystal structure of the enzyme−phosphonopyruvate complex, and mutant analysis. Biochemistry. 2002;41:780–7.

  38. 38.

    Tjaden B, Plagens A, Dorr C, Siebers B, Hensel R. Phosphoenolpyruvate synthetase and pyruvate, phosphate dikinase of Thermoproteus tenax: key pieces in the puzzle of archaeal carbohydrate metabolism. Mol Microbiol. 2006;60:287–98.

  39. 39.

    Maher DT, Santos IR, Golsby-Smith L, Gleeson J, Eyre BD. Groundwater-derived dissolved inorganic and organic carbon exports from a mangrove tidal creek: the missing mangrove carbon sink? Limnol Ocean. 2013;58:475–88.

  40. 40.

    Bauer JE, Cai W-J, Raymond PA, Bianchi TS, Hopkinson CS, Regnier PAG. The changing carbon cycle of the coastal ocean. Nature. 2013;504:61–70.

  41. 41.

    Sousa FL, Martin WF. Biochemical fossils of the ancient transition from geoenergetics to bioenergetics in prokaryotic one carbon compound metabolism. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2014;1837:964–81.

  42. 42.

    Laso-Pérez R, Wegener G, Knittel K, Widdel F, Harding KJ, Krukenberg V, et al. Thermophilic archaea activate butane via alkyl-coenzyme M formation. Nature. 2016;539:396–401.

  43. 43.

    Borrel G, Adam PS, Gribaldo S. Methanogenesis and the Wood–Ljungdahl pathway: an ancient, versatile, and fragile association. Genome Biol Evol. 2016;8:1706–11.

  44. 44.

    He Y, Li M, Perumal V, Feng X, Fang J, Xie J, et al. Genomic and enzymatic evidence for acetogenesis among multiple lineages of the archaeal phylum Bathyarchaeota widespread in marine sediments. Nat Microbiol. 2016;1:16035.

  45. 45.

    Lazar CS, Baker BJ, Seitz K, Hyde AS, Dick GJ, Hinrichs K-U, et al. Genomic evidence for distinct carbon substrate preferences and ecological niches of Bathyarchaeota in estuarine sediments. Environ Microbiol. 2016;18:1200–11.

  46. 46.

    Baker BJ, Saw JH, Lind AE, Lazar CS, Hinrichs K-U, Teske AP, et al. Genomic inference of the metabolism of cosmopolitan subsurface Archaea, Hadesarchaea. Nat Microbiol. 2016;1:16002.

  47. 47.

    Probst AJ, Weinmaier T, Raymann K, Perras A, Emerson JB, Rattei T, et al. Biology of a widespread uncultivated archaeon that contributes to carbon fixation in the subsurface. Nat Commun. 2014;5:5497.

  48. 48.

    Sousa FL, Neukirchen S, Allen JF, Lane N, Martin WF. Lokiarchaeon is hydrogen dependent. Nat Microbiol. 2016;1:16034.

  49. 49.

    Bapteste É, Brochier C, Boucher Y. Higher-level classification of the Archaea: evolution of methanogenesis and methanogens. Archaea. 2005;1:353–63.

  50. 50.

    Vornolt J, Kunow J, Stetter KO, Thauer RK. Enzymes and coenzymes of the carbon monoxide dehydrogenase pathway for autotrophic CO2 fixation in Archaeoglobus lithotrophicus and the lack of carbon monoxide dehydrogenase in the heterotrophic A. profundus. Arch Microbiol. 1995;163:112–8.

  51. 51.

    Nelson-Sathi S, Dagan T, Landan G, Janssen A, Steel M, McInerney JO, et al. Acquisition of 1,000 eubacterial genes physiologically transformed a methanogen at the origin of Haloarchaea. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2012;109:20537–42.

  52. 52.

    Becker EA, Seitzer PM, Tritt A, Larsen D, Krusor M, Yao AI, et al. Phylogenetically driven sequencing of extremely halophilic archaea reveals strategies for static and dynamic osmo-response. PLoS Genet. 2014;10:e1004784.

  53. 53.

    Parizzi LP, Grassi MCB, Llerena LA, Carazzolle MF, Queiroz VL, Lunardi I, et al. The genome sequence of Propionibacterium acidipropionici provides insights into its biotechnological and industrial potential. BMC Genom. 2012;13:562.

  54. 54.

    Schmidt M, Schönheit P. Acetate formation in the photoheterotrophic bacterium Chloroflexus aurantiacus involves an archaeal type ADP-forming acetyl-CoA synthetase isoenzyme I. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2013;349:171–9.

  55. 55.

    Rother M, Metcalf WW. Anaerobic growth of Methanosarcina acetivorans C2A on carbon monoxide: an unusual way of life for a methanogenic archaeon. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004;101:16929–34.

  56. 56.

    Basen M, Schut GJ, Nguyen DM, Lipscomb GL, Benn RA, Prybol CJ, et al. Single gene insertion drives bioalcohol production by a thermophilic archaeon. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2014;111:17618–23.

  57. 57.

    Tabita FR, Hanson TE, LI H, Satagopan S, Singh J, Chan S. Function, structure, and evolution of the RubisCO-like proteins and their RubisCO homologs. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2007;71:576–99.

  58. 58.

    Tabita FR, Hanson TE, Satagopan S, Witte BH, Kreel NE. Phylogenetic and evolutionary relationships of RubisCO and the RubisCO-like proteins and the functional lessons provided by diverse molecular forms. Philos Trans R Soc B. 2008;363:2629–40.

  59. 59.

    Wrighton KC, Castelle CJ, Varaljay VA, Satagopan S, Brown CT, Wilkins MJ, et al. RubisCO of a nucleoside pathway known from Archaea is found in diverse uncultivated phyla in bacteria. ISME J. 2016;10:2702–14.

  60. 60.

    Ashida H, Saito Y, Nakano T, Tandeau de Marsac N, Sekowska A, Danchin A, et al. RuBisCO-like proteins as the enolase enzyme in the methionine salvage pathway: functional and evolutionary relationships between RuBisCO-like proteins and photosynthetic RuBisCO. J Exp Bot. 2007;59:1543–54.

  61. 61.

    Berg IA, Kockelkorn D, Ramos-Vera WH, Say RF, Zarzycki J, Hügler M, et al. Autotrophic carbon fixation in archaea. Nat Rev Micro. 2010;8:447–60.

  62. 62.

    Mueller Cajar O, Badger MR. New roads lead to RubisCO in archaebacteria. BioEssays. 2007;29:722–4.

  63. 63.

    Reysenbach AL, Flores GE. Electron microscopy encounters with unusual thermophiles helps direct genomic analysis of Aciduliprofundum boonei. Geobiology. 2008;6:331–6.

  64. 64.

    Sato T, Atomi H, Imanaka T. Archaeal type III RuBisCOs function in a pathway for AMP metabolism. Science. 2007;315:1003–6.

  65. 65.

    Vanwonterghem I, Evans PN, Parks DH, Jensen PD, Woodcroft BJ, Hugenholtz P, et al. Methylotrophic methanogenesis discovered in the archaeal phylum Verstraetearchaeota. Nat Microbiol. 2016;1:16170.

  66. 66.

    Erb TJ, Evans BS, Cho K, Warlick BP, Sriram J, Wood BM, et al. A RubisCO-like protein links SAM metabolism with isoprenoid biosynthesis. Nat Chem Biol. 2012;8:926–32.

  67. 67.

    North JA, Sriram J, Chourey K, Ecker CD, Sharma R, Wildenthal JA, et al. Metabolic regulation as a consequence of anaerobic 5-methylthioadenosine recycling in Rhodospirillum rubrum. Mbio. 2016;7:e00855–16.

  68. 68.

    Stolz JF, Basu P, Santini JM, Oremland RS. Arsenic and selenium in microbial metabolism. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2006;60:107–30.

  69. 69.

    Wang P-P, Sun G-X, Zhu Y-G. Identification and characterization of arsenite methyltransferase from an archaeon, Methanosarcina acetivorans C2A. Environ Sci Technol. 2014;48:12706–13.

  70. 70.

    Qin J, Rosen BP, Zhang Y, Wang G, Franke S, Rensing C. Arsenic detoxification and evolution of trimethylarsine gas by a microbial arsenite S-adenosylmethionine methyltransferase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103:2075–80.

  71. 71.

    Yin XX, Chen J, Qin J, Sun GX, Rosen BP, Zhu YG. Biotransformation and volatilization of arsenic by three photosynthetic cyanobacteria. Plant Physiol. 2011;156:1631–8.

  72. 72.

    Wu G-R, Hong H-L, Yan C-L. Arsenic accumulation and translocation in Mangrove (Aegiceras corniculatum L.) grown in arsenic contaminated soils. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015;12:7244–53.

  73. 73.

    Mariotti M, Santesmasses D, Capella-Gutierrez S, Mateo A, Arnan C, Johnson R, et al. Evolution of selenophosphate synthetases: emergence and relocation of function through independent duplications and recurrent subfunctionalization. Genome Res. 2015;25:1256–67.

  74. 74.

    Mariotti M, Lobanov AV, Manta B, Santesmasses D, Bofill A, Guigó R, et al. Lokiarchaeota marks the transition between the archaeal and eukaryotic selenocysteine encoding systems. Mol Biol Evol. 2016;33:2441–53.

  75. 75.

    Stock T, Rother M. Selenoproteins in archaea and gram-positive bacteria. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2009;1790:1520–32.

  76. 76.

    Lobanov AV, Hatfield DL, Gladyshev VN. Eukaryotic selenoproteins and selenoproteomes. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2009;1790:1424–8.

  77. 77.

    Krol A. Evolutionarily different RNA motifs and RNA-protein complexes to achieve selenoprotein synthesis. Biochimie. 2002;84:765–74.

  78. 78.

    Spang A, Saw JH, Jørgensen SL, Zaremba-Niedzwiedzka K, Martijn J, Lind AE, et al. Complex archaea that bridge the gap between prokaryotes and eukaryotes. Nature. 2015;521:173–9.

Download references


This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 31622002, 41506163) to M.L., a China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (No. 2017M612718), a Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province, China (No. 2017A030310296) and a National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 31700430) to Y.L., and a Sloan Fellowship in Ocean Science to B.J.B.

Author contributions:

Y.L. and M.L. conceived the study. Z.C.Z. and J.D.G. sampled in the field, revised and reviewed the paper. Y.L. and J.P. analyzed the data. B.J.B. interrupted the metabolic capabilities. Y.L., M.L., Z.C.Z. and B.J.B. wrote the paper.

Author information


  1. Institute for Advanced Study, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China

    • Yang Liu
    • , Zhichao Zhou
    • , Jie Pan
    •  & Meng Li
  2. Key Laboratory of Optoelectronic Devices and Systems of Ministry of Education and Guangdong Province, College of Optoelectronic Engineering, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China

    • Yang Liu
    •  & Jie Pan
  3. Laboratory of Environmental Microbiology and Toxicology, School of Biological Sciences, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong, China

    • Zhichao Zhou
    •  & Ji-Dong Gu
  4. Department of Marine Science, University of Texas Austin, Marine Science Institute, 750 Channel View Drive, Port Aransas, TX, 78373, USA

    • Brett J. Baker


  1. Search for Yang Liu in:

  2. Search for Zhichao Zhou in:

  3. Search for Jie Pan in:

  4. Search for Brett J. Baker in:

  5. Search for Ji-Dong Gu in:

  6. Search for Meng Li in:

Conflict of interest:

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Meng Li.

Electronic supplementary material