Abstract
Introduction
Charcot Marie tooth disease (CMTD) is also known as Hereditary sensory motor neuropathy. It poses difficulties in attaining intra-operative neuromonitoring signals for deformity correction surgery. In this case report, we intent to mention key points for obtaining good neuromonitoring signals in these cases which increases the safety in scoliosis surgery.
Case presentation
We present a 14-year-old boy, known case of CMTD, presented with progressive deformity of the back. The child was wheelchair-bound and could walk only a few steps with support. He was unable to maintain a sitting balance without using upper limbs making him functionally quadriparatic. The radiographs showed a double scoliotic curve with costo-pelvic impingement. At the onset, no signals were obtained with routine intra-operative neuromonitoring settings.
Discussion
Increasing the sweep length and voltage in our neuro-monitors helped in acquiring the baseline signals and we went ahead to proceed the deformity correction.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 1 print issues and online access
We are sorry, but there is no personal subscription option available for your country.
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Fridman V, Bundy B, Reilly MM, Pareyson D, Bacon C, Burns J, et al. CMT subtypes and disease burden in patients enrolled in the Inherited Neuropathies Consortium natural history study: a cross-sectional analysis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2015;86:873–8.
Skre H. Genetic and clinical aspects of Charcot-Marie-Tooth’s disease. Clin Genet. 1974;6:98–118.
Sarwark J, Sarwahi V. New strategies and decision making in the management of neuromuscular scoliosis. Orthop Clin North Am. 2007;38:485–96.
Lowe T, Berven SH, Schwab FJ, Bridwell KH. The SRS classification for adult spinal deformity: building on the King/Moe and Lenke classification systems. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006;31:S119–25.
McCarthy RE. Management of neuromuscular scoliosis. Orthop Clin North Am. 1999 ;30:435–49.
Karol LA, Elerson E. Scoliosis in patients with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:1504–10.
MacDonald DB, Al Zayed Z, Khoudeir I, Stigsby B. Monitoring scoliosis surgery with combined multiple pulse transcranial electric motor and cortical somatosensory-evoked potentials from the lower and upper extremities. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003;28:194–203.
Peck J, Poppino K, Sparagana S, Rampy P, Freeman S, Jo C-H, et al. Use of transcranial motor-evoked potentials to provide reliable intraoperative neuromonitoring for the Charcot-Marie-Tooth population undergoing spine deformity surgery. Spine Deform. 2022;10:411–8.
Horacek O, Mazanec R, Morris CE, Kobesova A. Spinal deformities in hereditary motor and sensory neuropathy: a retrospective qualitative, quantitative, genotypical, and familial analysis of 175 patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007;32:2502–8.
Jones KB, Sponseller PD, Shindle MK, McCarthy ML. Longitudinal parental perceptions of spinal fusion for neuromuscular spine deformity in patients with totally involved cerebral palsy. J Pediatr Orthop. 2003;23:143–9.
Pastorelli F, Di Silvestre M, Plasmati R, Michelucci R, Greggi T, Morigi A, et al. The prevention of neural complications in the surgical treatment of scoliosis: the role of the neurophysiological intraoperative monitoring. Eur Spine J. 2011;20:S105–14.
Nuwer MR, Emerson RG, Galloway G, Legatt AD, Lopez J, Minahan R. et al. Evidence-based guideline update: intraoperative spinal monitoring with somatosensory and transcranial electrical motor evoked potentials: report of the Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology and the American Clinical Neurophysiology Society. Neurology. 2012;78:585–9.
Fehlings MG, Brodke DS, Norvell DC, Dettori JR. The evidence for intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring in spine surgery: does it make a difference? Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010;35:S37–46.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
AS was responsible for proofreading the manuscript. VH was responsible for literature search and writing case presentation in the manuscript. AG was responsible for writing the Introduction, Discussion, and conclusion part of the manuscript and also submitting and responding to the reviewer’s comments. AJ was responsible for proof reading the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Srivastava, A., Hanasoge, V., Gupta, A. et al. Use of transcranial motor evoked potentials (TcMEPs) in spine deformity surgery in a case of Charcot-Marie-tooth disease—what we should know? A case report. Spinal Cord Ser Cases 10, 38 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41394-024-00648-z
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41394-024-00648-z