Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Evaluation of a ketogenic diet for improvement of neurological recovery in individuals with acute spinal cord injury: a pilot, randomized safety and feasibility trial


Study design

Longitudinal, randomized study.


(1) Test the safety and feasibility of a ketogenic diet (KD) intervention in the acute stages of spinal cord injury (SCI), (2) assess the effects of a KD on neurological recovery, and (3) identify potential serum biomarkers associated with KD-induced changes in neurological recovery.


Acute care and rehabilitation facility.


The KD is a high-fat, low-carbohydrate diet that includes ≈70–80% total energy as fat. Seven participants with acute complete and incomplete SCI (AIS A–D) were randomly assigned to KD (n = 4) or standard diet (SD, n = 3). Neurological examinations, resting energy expenditure analysis, and collection of blood for evaluation of circulating ketone levels were performed within 72 h of injury and before discharge. Untargeted metabolomics analysis was performed on serum samples to identify potential serum biomarkers that may explain differential responses between groups.


Our pilot findings primarily demonstrated that KD is safe and feasible to be administered in acute SCI. Furthermore, upper extremity motor scores were higher (p < 0.05) in the KD vs. SD group and an anti-inflammatory lysophospholipid, lysoPC 16:0, was present at higher levels, and an inflammatory blood protein, fibrinogen, was present at lower levels in the KD serum samples vs. SD serum samples.


Taken together, these preliminary results suggest that a KD may have anti-inflammatory effects that may promote neuroprotection, resulting in improved neurological recovery in SCI. Future studies with larger sample size are warranted for demonstrating efficacy of KD for improving neurological recovery.


There is an urgent need for innovative therapies that improve neurological recovery following spinal cord injury (SCI). Despite extensive research, clinical advancements, and improved rehabilitation strategies, SCI continues to be a significant cause of disability and mortality [1,2,3]. After the initial injury, the damaged spinal cord undergoes multiple secondary pathological states that present important therapeutic targets for development of neuroprotective strategies for treatment of SCI.

A wide variety of evidence [4,5,6,7,8,9,10] suggests that the ketogenic diet (KD) may have beneficial disease-modifying effects in a broad range of neurological disorders characterized by hyperexcitability and death of neurons. The diet is composed of 80–90% fat, with carbohydrate and protein constituting the remainder of the nutrient intake. Energy is largely derived from oxidation of dietary fats. These fats are converted to the ketone bodies, β-hydroxybutyrate (BHB), acetoacetate, and acetone, which serve as an alternative energy source to glucose. Although the exact mechanism by which the diet provides neuroprotection is not fully understood, its effects on cellular energetics likely play a key role [10,11,12,13]. KDs increase circulating levels of ketone bodies, a more efficient fuel for the brain, resulting in enhanced capacity for energy production and an improved ability of neurons to resist negative metabolic challenges [14, 15]. Additionally, biochemical changes induced by the diet—including ketosis, high serum fat levels, and low serum glucose levels—may contribute to protection against neuronal death by apoptosis [16] and excitotoxicity [17] through a multitude of additional mechanisms, including antioxidant [12, 18] and anti-inflammatory [19] actions. Neuroinflammation [20, 21], excitotoxicity [22], and apoptosis [23] are thought to be major mechanisms that contribute to secondary injury following SCI, thus protection against this sequelae via KD could produce a significant benefit in neurological recovery after SCI. A study showed that rats with cervical SCI showed a reduction in the lesion size and improved forelimb function when a KD was started 4 h after injury [24]. This effect was specific, as the neuroprotective effects could be ablated by treatment with a ketone transporter antagonist.

Emerging evidence also suggests that acute-phase hyperglycemia is a critical factor in the poor functional outcomes of SCI [25, 26]. The presence of hyperglycemia ( ≥ 126 mg/dL) on hospital admission (irrespective of past diabetes mellitus history) was found to be strongly associated with a lower probability of improvement in motor and sensory function. Results of preclinical studies have indicated that hyperglycemia exacerbates inflammatory cytokine production, neural cell apoptosis, and demyelination during acute SCI in rodents [25]. These findings have shed light on the importance of achieving tight glycemic control in acute human SCI to obtain better neurological outcomes.

To extend these results, the aims of this pilot study were to (1) test the safety and feasibility of a KD intervention in an acute care setting (2), assess the effects of a KD on neurological recovery, and (3) employ untargeted metabolomics analysis to identify potential serum protein biomarkers associated with KD-induced changes in neurological recovery in individuals with acute SCI.


Study design, protocol and participants

Using a randomized, repeated-measures study design, seven participants (2 F and 5 M, 35 ± 12 y) with acute complete and incomplete (with anterior cord syndrome) SCI (American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS) A–D) were randomly assigned into one of the two study groups (KD and standard diet [SD]) at a 1:1 ratio. The neurological level of injury (NLI) ranged from C4 to T11. As patients with Brown-Sequard and Central Cord Syndromes were shown to have more favorable prognoses [27, 28], they were not eligible for participation. Initially, there were two motor-complete (AIS A and B) and two motor-incomplete (AIS C) patients in the KD group compared with one motor-complete (AIS A) and two motor-incomplete (AIS C and D) patients in the SD group. Individual patient characteristics can be found in Table 1.

Table 1 Clinical characteristics of study participants

Patients were taken to acute care after injury. Neurological examinations, resting energy expenditure (REE) analysis, and blood collection were performed within 72 h of injury (after the initial trauma evaluation and resuscitation) and again before discharge from the rehabilitation hospital. Neurological tests were all performed by the same American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) In-Step certified Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation clinician at baseline (at least 24 h after injury) and before discharge. The Sacral Sparing definition was used to define the completeness of injury [29]. Following acute care (16 ± 9 days for KD vs. 16 ± 6 days for SD), patients were transferred to the Spain Rehabilitation Center (SRC) for in-patient rehabilitation care (20 ± 6 days in KD vs. 18 ± 1 in SD). We certify that all applicable institutional and governmental regulations concerning the ethical use of human volunteers were followed during the course of this research.



The KD was a high-fat, low-carbohydrate diet that included ≈72% total energy as fat, ≈25% as protein, and ≈3% as carbohydrate during enteral feeding and ≈65% total energy as fat, ≈27% as protein, and ≈8% as carbohydrate and fiber during solid feeding. The SD included ≈35% total energy as fat, ≈27% as protein, and ≈44% as carbohydrate and fiber. None of SD participants received enteral feeding. Dietary fat sources focused on animal and vegetable (for vegetarians) fats. Dietary protein sources included animal, plant, and nut and seed proteins, and dietary carbohydrate resources included vegetarian and vegan sources. KetoCal®, a nutritionally complete, ready-to-feed ketogenic formula in a 3:1 ratio (fat:carbohydrate + protein), was provided by Nutricia for the patients who receive enteral nutrition. All semi-liquid and solid food were provided by the UAB Hospital Kitchen and Clinical Research Unit (CRU)’s Bionutrition Unit every day of the week. The overall energy amount was determined based on the REE, assessed via indirect calorimetry and multiplied by an activity factor. All patients in KD group adhered to the prescribed diet. Adherence to diet was closely monitored by the study team by measuring serum BHB levels once a week. Individual BHB data can be found in Table 1. Blood concentration of 0.5–3 mM (nutritional ketosis) was considered safe and acceptable. Adherence was also assessed using food records.

In-patient rehabilitation care

Patients in both groups underwent an intensive rehabilitation program (standard of care in the SRC). Therapies were offered 5.5 days/week for a total of 15 h per week. Rehabilitation care focused on respiratory therapy, passive and active range of motion, neuro-muscular re-education, mobility, transfers, wheelchair mobility skills, bowel and bladder management, tone and spasticity management, and skills for performing other activities of daily living.

Clinical tests

Motor and sensory examinations

Testing was performed according to the International Standards for the Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury [30]. The average number of hours from injury to baseline (pre-intervention) measure was 67.8 ± 5.1. The AIS Motor Index Score was used to measure motor function in the upper and lower extremities. For the sensory examination, each dermatome was tested for both sharp (pin-prick) and light-touch (LT) sensation and was graded on a three-point scale. In addition, changes in neurological level of injury (NLI) and AIS classification were determined at discharge. One examiner performed all examinations and was blinded to the condition of the diet.

Laboratory tests

Blood collection

After a 10- to 12-h fast, blood samples were collected for measurement of serum glucose and lipid (cholesterol, triglycerides, high-density, and low-density lipoprotein) levels at baseline (within 72-h injury) and discharge. Serum glucose and lipids were analyzed using an automated glucose analyzer (Sirrus analyzer; Stanbio Laboratory; Boerne, TX, USA) as per manufacturer's instructions. Lipid analysis was done on six patients due to limited amount of sampled blood in the SD group. In addition, blood samples were collected for measurement of blood ketone (BHB) levels once a week, 2 h after first meal of the day. An automated analyzer (Sirrus analyzer; Stanbio Laboratory; Boerne, TX) was used to confirm nutritionally induced ketosis (blood BHB concentration, 0.5–3 mM) in the KD group.

Untargeted metabolomics analysis

As an adjunct or alternative to neurological assessments, we have performed an untargeted metabolomics via liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (LC-MS)/MS global analysis on serum samples to identify potential biomarkers that can predict neurological recovery and explain the differences between groups. LC-MS/MS analysis and data processing (via MetaboAnalyst— and METLIN— have been performed at UAB Targeted Metabolomics and Proteomics Laboratory with established procedures published elsewhere [31,32,33].

Statistical analyses

Statistical analyses were performed using SAS, version 9.4 (SAS Institute, Inc.; Cary, NC). Mixed-model, repeated-measures analysis of variance was used to assess the effects of group (KD, SD), time (pre-, post-intervention), and the group-by-time interaction on the outcomes of interest (motor and sensory scores and peak intensities of variable importance in projection [VIP] scores from the metabolomics analysis). A compound symmetry covariance matrix was assumed for analyses. Due to the small sample size and pilot nature of the current study, post hoc comparisons were performed without adjustment for multiple pairwise comparisons. Statistical tests were two-sided, and p-values <0.05 were considered statistically significant.


BHB, glucose and lipid concentrations

As expected, the KD group maintained nutritional ketosis (Table 1) over 5 ± 2 weeks (KD BHB concentration: 1.02 mmol/L vs. 0.1 mmol/L in the SD group). Individual BHB (mmol/L), fasting glucose, and lipid (mg/dL) levels are shown in Table 1. KD group demonstrated a reduction in fasting glucose (Table 1, Δ: 24 mg/dL; pre: 119.5 vs. post: 95.25 mg/dL). No change in fasting glucose was found in the SD group. In addition, KD group maintained a normal lipid profile in contrast to SD group, which showed an increase in cholesterol, triglycerides, and low-density lipoprotein at discharge.

Motor and sensory examinations

In 86% of our patients (5 of 7), there was no change in NLI between the initial assessment (within 72 h of injury) and at discharge (5 ± 2 weeks post-injury). Two patients in the KD group demonstrated improvements in the NLI and AIS classification (T10 AIS A to T11 AIS B and C4 AIS C to C5 AIS D). Individual upper and lower-extremity motor scores (UEMSs and LEMSs), LT and pin-prick sensory scores at baseline and discharge are shown in Fig. 1a–d. An overall time effect was observed for UEMS (p < 0.05). The KD group demonstrated an increase (p < 0.05) in UEMS compared with baseline scores (KD: 24 [pre] vs. 38.7 [post]), whereas no change (p = 0.3) was observed in the SD group (SD: 39.5 [pre] vs. 47 [post]). Between the baseline and discharge timepoints, 15 UEMS and 13 LEMS points were recovered in the KD group vs. 8 UEMS and 6 LEMS points recovered in the SD group. In addition, no effect of time and group was observed in sensory outcomes (LT or pin-prick scores).

Fig. 1

Effects of the ketogenic diet (KD) vs. standard diet (SD) on motor and sensory scores after spinal cord injury. Individual upper extremity motor scores (UEMSs) and lower-extremity motor scores (LEMSs) for KD (a) and SD (b) group; and light-touch (LT) and pin-prick (PP) sensory scores for KD (c) and SD (d) group. *Indicates AIS grade conversion

Untargeted metabolomics analysis

Using XCMSonline, peaks containing individual ions were aligned according to their retention times. Multivariate analysis (unsupervised principal component analysis) and supervised partial least squares-discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) were performed to assess chemometric separation among the SD and KD samples. PLS-DA showed a separation of the control and KD groups (Fig. 2a, b). Identified by VIP analysis as ions most contributing to the separations seen in Fig. 2a, b were characterized by having high m/z values (600–800) and being doubly charged ions, thereby suggesting masses in the 1200–1600 Da range. These ions and their MS/MS spectra were analyzed using Protein Pilot™, which revealed that they were fibrinogen-related peptides (Fibrinogen alpha and beta subunits) (Table 2). Compared with the SD, contents of these peptides were decreased in the KD group. Inspection of the remaining ions in the VIP data using the METLIN database revealed the presence of lysophophatidylcholine 16:0 (LysoPC 16:0). Compared with the SD, contents of LysoPC was increased in the KD group.

Fig. 2

Partial least squares-discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) scores plot from the LC-MDS metabolomics data collected in negative (a) and positive ion (b) modes between selected principal components 1 and 2 in the ketogenic diet (KD, patient codes: #02, 03, 06, and 07) vs. standard diet (SD, patient codes: #01, 04, and 05) group data. Each component is the sum of the contributions made by each metabolite ion to it. The ellipses represent the 95% confidence limits for each group (red—baseline (B) standard diet, green—discharge (D) standard diet, blue—baseline (B) keto diet, light blue—discharge (D)

Table 2 Variable importance in projection (VIP) features identified by PLS-DA in positive and negative ion mode


The primary finding of this pilot project is that a KD intervention was safe and feasible to be administered in the acute care setting for individuals with SCI as nutritional ketosis and normoglycemia were safely achieved, normal lipid levels were maintained, and no adverse effects were noted. Secondarily, UEMSs were higher (p < 0.05) in the KD group compared with the SD group. In addition, levels of fibrinogen, a pleiotropic blood protein that is known to regulate neuroinflammation, were lower, and levels of lysoPC 16:0, an anti-inflammatory lysophospholipid, were higher in the KD group compared with the SD group.

On average, patients in the KD group recovered 28 motor points (UEMS = 15 pts; LEMS = 13 pts) compared with 12 motor points for the SD group (UEMS = 4 pts; LEMS = 8 pts) over the course of this study (5 ± 2 weeks). The typical recovery pattern in SCI has been reported to be a rapid increase in motor scores from 1 week to 6 months, followed by a slower rate of change from 6 months to 1 year [34, 35]. We were encouraged by the fact that the recovery in motor points in the KD group over the course of 5 weeks (average stay in the hospital) was greater than or equal to the spontaneous recovery gains typically reported 6 months to 1 year after injury. Previous studies [35,36,37,38] have shown that patients with motor-complete and -incomplete injuries experience an 18–28 motor point recovery on average (UEMS = 8–11 pts; LEMS = 8–19 pts). These studies included patients with Brown-Sequard [27, 28], which is typically associated with more favorable prognoses. Therefore, it is possible that the recovered points reported in these studies may be higher compared with studies, which only included complete or incomplete injuries including anterior cord syndrome.

With respect to sensation, the patients in the KD group recovered 13 points for LT and 16.5 points for pin-prick, compared with 5.5 points for LT and 7.5 points for pin-prick in the SD group (Fig. 1c). The results of the SD group are consistent with previous studies [36,37,38] in acute SCI that reported an average recovery of 6–10 points for LT and 6–12 points for pin-prick sensation 6 months to 1-year post-injury. However, the KD group demonstrated greater LT and pin-prick recovery at only 5 weeks post-injury compared with both the SD group and previous studies. In addition, two patients in the KD group demonstrated improvements in the NLI (T10 AIS B to T11 AIS B and C4 AIS C to C5 AIS C). The greatest proportion of spontaneous AIS grade conversions has been shown to be evident between 12 and 16 weeks) [34, 35]; therefore, the early conversions in AIS grades may be due to the effect of KD.

Motor and sensory improvements in the present study should be interpreted cautiously as the injury levels and completeness were not balanced among KD (2 AIS C, 1 AIS A and 1 AIS B) and SD (1 AIS A, 1 AIS B, and 1 AIS D) groups despite randomization. Patients with AIS C have been shown to gain more points compared with other AIS grades. Consistent with this finding, one subject who was an AIS D in SD gained fewer points than those with AIS grade C in KD group due to a possible ceiling effect in AIS D injuries. In addition, the International Standards for the Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury assessment tool has practical limitations. It may be difficult to perform an accurate neurological test due to sedation or pain after surgery or due to pain caused by chronic conditions such as carpal tunnel syndrome. In the present study, none of the patients were sedated or in pain, and all patients were fully cognizant during motor and sensory examinations, minimizing these confounders. However, one patient in the KD group (Table 1, patient code: #02) presented with carpal tunnel syndrome at admission. Although carpal tunnel syndrome was not treated during rehabilitation care, it may have impacted the patient’s performance during neurological tests at baseline and discharge due to weakness in hand and fingers. In addition, examiner effects may be introduced if more than one examiner performs neurological testing. One certified examiner conducted all assessments over the course of the study to eliminate examiner effects.

To gain further insight into the mechanisms that underlay the differential neurological recovery between the KD and SD groups, we performed an untargeted metabolomics analysis to identify potential serum biomarkers associated with changes in neurological recovery. Although the intent of the metabolomics analysis was to detect small molecule compounds that are part of metabolic pathways, in this case the most significant VIP ions had masses (m/z) that were above 600. When examined more closely, these ions had 1-13C-ions that were spaced at 0.5 m/z, i.e., they were doubly charged. Their MSMS spectra suggested that they were peptides. Analysis with the proteomics software (Protein Pilot™) confirmed this and further revealed that each peptide (see in the Table 2) was derived from proteins, fibrinogen (alpha and beta subunits) and lysoPC 16:0. Furthermore, not only were positively charged peptide ions detected, but also their negatively charged counterparts.

Although we can only speculate as to the mechanisms connected to these observations, it is possible that low fibrinogen and high lysoPC 16:0 levels in the KD group may have promoted neuroprotection, thus improving neurological recovery. There is abundant evidence [39,40,41] that fibrinogen is present in the nervous system after traumatic injuries characterized by vascular rupture or disruption of the blood–brain barrier in the central nervous system. Rupture of the vasculature allows entry of blood proteins into nervous system tissue, which is shortly followed by edema and neural damage. Fibrinogen interacts with cell surface receptors expressed by microglia, and activation of microglia by fibrinogen has been shown to initiate neuroinflammation at sites of vascular injury. In addition, growing evidence [42,43,44] suggests that lysoPCs can reduce systemic inflammation in rodent models of sepsis and ischemia, as well as human chronic inflammatory disorders like ulcerative colitis. Under conditions of severe inflammatory stress, activity of plasma phospholipase A2 (sPLA2), an enzyme associated with the activity of the innate immune system and inflammatory disorders, increases. Systemic lysoPCs help to shift the balance back toward sPLA2 inhibition and cytoprotection. Thus, taken together, these results suggest that anti-inflammatory effects of the KD, such as decreased fibrinogen and increased lysoPC 16:0 levels, may have promoted neuroprotection, thereby improving neurological recovery. Our findings are consistent with previous work in animals demonstrating a potential link between KD, anti-inflammatory mechanisms in the central nervous system, and modification of the progression of neurological disease. For example, the high fatty acid load associated with a KD has been shown to activate peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α, which may, in turn, have inhibitory effects on the proinflammatory transcription factors nuclear factor-κB and activation protein-1 [19].

Emerging evidence suggests that acute-phase hyperglycemia is a critical factor in the poor functional outcomes of SCI [25, 26]. Surprisingly, enteral and solid diets in SCI acute and sub-acute care have traditionally promoted high carbohydrate nutritional content (carbohydrate: 45%; fat: 30%, and protein: 25%). The presence of hyperglycemia on hospital admission (irrespective of past diabetes mellitus history) was found to be strongly associated with a lower probability of improvement in neurological function [25]. The ability of a KD to ameliorate the diabetic state and help stabilize hyperglycemia has been repeatedly shown in human studies [45, 46]. Consistent with this literature, there was an overall reduction in fasting glucose in the KD group. One patient (Table 1, patient code: #07) admitted with hyperglycemia (fasting glucose: 178 mg/dL) achieved normoglycemia (fasting glucose: 115 mg/dL) following the KD intervention. The results of our study suggest that the KD may be safe to administer in patients with hyperglycemia and promote a normal glycemic state following SCI.

The greatest limitation of our study is the small sample size. We are aware that this pilot study is insufficiently powered to detect minimal, but clinically important differences, as well as other potential biomarkers reflective of neurological recovery. In addition to the treatment under investigation, the primary outcome variables may have been influenced by other covariates, such as NLI, severity of injury, sex, age, and rehabilitative therapies and that cannot be accounted for in the present study due to the small sample size. Future studies with larger sample size are warranted for demonstrating efficacy of KD for improving neurological recovery in the acute stages of SCI.


  1. 1.

    DeVivo MJ, Krause JS, Lammertse DP. Recent trends in mortality and causes of death among persons with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999;80:1411–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Jensen MP, Molton IR, Groah SL, Campbell ML, Charlifue S, Chiodo A, et al. Secondary health conditions in individuals aging with SCI: terminology, concepts and analytic approaches. Spinal Cord. 2012;50:373–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Strauss DJ, Devivo MJ, Paculdo DR, Shavelle RM. Trends in life expectancy after spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006;87:1079–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Gasior M, Rogawski MA, Hartman AL. Neuroprotective and disease-modifying effects of the ketogenic diet. Behav Pharmacol. 2006;17:431–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Prins ML, Matsumoto JH. The collective therapeutic potential of cerebral ketone metabolism in traumatic brain injury. J Lipid Res. 2014;55:2450–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Vanitallie TB, Nonas C, Di Rocco A, Boyar K, Hyams K, Heymsfield SB. Treatment of Parkinson disease with diet-induced hyperketonemia: a feasibility study. Neurology. 2005;64:728–30.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Freeman J, Veggiotti P, Lanzi G, Tagliabue A, Perucca E, Institute of Neurology ICMF. The ketogenic diet: from molecular mechanisms to clinical effects. Epilepsy Res. 2006;68:145–80.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Freeman JM, Vining EP, Pillas DJ, Pyzik PL, Casey JC, Kelly LM. The efficacy of the ketogenic diet-1998: a prospective evaluation of intervention in 150 children. Pediatrics. 1998;102:1358–63.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Reger MA, Henderson ST, Hale C, Cholerton B, Baker LD, Watson GS, et al. Effects of beta-hydroxybutyrate on cognition in memory-impaired adults. Neurobiol Aging. 2004;25:311–4.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Veyrat-Durebex C, Reynier P, Procaccio V, Hergesheimer R, Corcia P, Andres CR, et al. How can a ketogenic diet improve motor function? Front Mol Neurosci. 2018;11:15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Bough KJ, Gudi K, Han FT, Rathod AH, Eagles DA. An anticonvulsant profile of the ketogenic diet in the rat. Epilepsy Res. 2002;50:313–25.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Veech RL. The therapeutic implications of ketone bodies: the effects of ketone bodies in pathological conditions: ketosis, ketogenic diet, redox states, insulin resistance, and mitochondrial metabolism. Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fat Acids. 2004;70:309–19.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Veech RL, Chance B, Kashiwaya Y, Lardy HA, Cahill GF Jr. Ketone bodies, potential therapeutic uses. IUBMB Life. 2001;51:241–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Kashiwaya Y, Takeshima T, Mori N, Nakashima K, Clarke K, Veech RL. D-beta-hydroxybutyrate protects neurons in models of Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000;97:5440–4.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Tieu K, Perier C, Caspersen C, Teismann P, Wu DC, Yan SD, et al. D-beta-hydroxybutyrate rescues mitochondrial respiration and mitigates features of Parkinson disease. J Clin Invest. 2003;112:892–901.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Noh HS, Kim DW, Kang SS, Cho GJ, Choi WS. Ketogenic diet prevents clusterin accumulation induced by kainic acid in the hippocampus of male ICR mice. Brain Res. 2005;1042:114–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Noh HS, Hah YS, Nilufar R, Han J, Bong JH, Kang SS, et al. Acetoacetate protects neuronal cells from oxidative glutamate toxicity. J Neurosci Res. 2006;83:702–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Ziegler DR, Ribeiro LC, Hagenn M, Siqueira IR, Araujo E, Torres IL, et al. Ketogenic diet increases glutathione peroxidase activity in rat hippocampus. Neurochem Res. 2003;28:1793–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Cullingford TE. The ketogenic diet; fatty acids, fatty acid-activated receptors and neurological disorders. Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fat Acids. 2004;70:253–64.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Mabon PJ, Weaver LC, Dekaban GA. Inhibition of monocyte/macrophage migration to a spinal cord injury site by an antibody to the integrin alphaD: a potential new anti-inflammatory treatment. Exp Neurol. 2000;166:52–64.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Popovich PG, Wei P, Stokes BT. Cellular inflammatory response after spinal cord injury in Sprague-Dawley and Lewis rats. J Comp Neurol. 1997;377:443–64.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Farooque M, Hillered L, Holtz A, Olsson Y. Changes of extracellular levels of amino acids after graded compression trauma to the spinal cord: an experimental study in the rat using microdialysis. J Neurotrauma. 1996;13:537–48.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Beattie MS, Farooqui AA, Bresnahan JC. Review of current evidence for apoptosis after spinal cord injury. J Neurotrauma. 2000;17:915–25.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Streijger F, Plunet WT, Lee JH, Liu J, Lam CK, Park S, et al. Ketogenic diet improves forelimb motor function after spinal cord injury in rodents. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e78765.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Kobayakawa K, Kumamaru H, Saiwai H, Kubota K, Ohkawa Y, Kishimoto J, et al. Acute hyperglycemia impairs functional improvement after spinal cord injury in mice and humans. Sci Transl Med. 2014;6:256ra137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Sala F, Menna G, Bricolo A, Young W. Role of glycemia in acute spinal cord injury. Data from a rat experimental model and clinical experience. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1999;890:133–54.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Kirshblum SC, O’Connor KC. Predicting neurologic recovery in traumatic cervical spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998;79:1456–66.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Pollard ME, Apple DF. Factors associated with improved neurologic outcomes in patients with incomplete tetraplegia. Spine (Phila PA 1976). 2003;28:33–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Waters RL, Adkins RH, Yakura JS. Definition of complete spinal cord injury. Paraplegia. 1991;29:573–81.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Ditunno JF Jr., Young W, Donovan WH, Creasey G. The international standards booklet for neurological and functional classification of spinal cord injury. American Spinal Injury Association. Paraplegia. 1994;32:70–80.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Prasain JK, Wilson LS, Arabshahi A, Grubbs C, Barnes S. Mass spectrometric evidence for the modification of small molecules in a cobalt-60-irradiated rodent diet. J Mass Spectrom. 2017;52:707.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Barnes S, Benton HP, Casazza K, Cooper SJ, Cui X, Du X, et al. Training in metabolomics research. II. Processing and statistical analysis of metabolomics data, metabolite identification, pathway analysis, applications of metabolomics and its future. J Mass Spectrom. 2016;51:535–48.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Barnes S, Benton HP, Casazza K, Cooper SJ, Cui X, Du X, et al. Training in metabolomics research. I. Designing the experiment, collecting and extracting samples and generating metabolomics data. J Mass Spectrom. 2016;51:461–75.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Marino RJ, Burns S, Graves DE, Leiby BE, Kirshblum S, Lammertse DP. Upper- and lower-extremity motor recovery after traumatic cervical spinal cord injury: an update from the national spinal cord injury database. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011;92:369–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Steeves JD, Kramer JK, Fawcett JW, Cragg J, Lammertse DP, Blight AR, et al. Extent of spontaneous motor recovery after traumatic cervical sensorimotor complete spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2011;49:257–65.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Waters RL, Adkins RH, Yakura JS, Sie I. Motor and sensory recovery following complete tetraplegia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1993;74:242–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Waters RL, Adkins RH, Yakura JS, Sie I. Motor and sensory recovery following incomplete tetraplegia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994;75:306–11.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Waters RL, Adkins RH, Yakura JS, Sie I. Motor and sensory recovery following incomplete paraplegia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994;75:67–72.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Bardehle S, Rafalski VA, Akassoglou K. Breaking boundaries-coagulation and fibrinolysis at the neurovascular interface. Front Cell Neurosci. 2015;9:354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Davalos D, Baeten KM, Whitney MA, Mullins ES, Friedman B, Olson ES, et al. Early detection of thrombin activity in neuroinflammatory disease. Ann Neurol. 2014;75:303–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Ryu JK, Davalos D, Akassoglou K. Fibrinogen signal transduction in the nervous system. J Thromb Haemost. 2009;7(Suppl 1):151–4.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Cunningham TJ, Yao L, Lucena A. Product inhibition of secreted phospholipase A2 may explain lysophosphatidylcholines’ unexpected therapeutic properties. J Inflamm (Lond). 2008;5:17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Treede I, Braun A, Sparla R, Kuhnel M, Giese T, Turner JR, et al. Anti-inflammatory effects of phosphatidylcholine. J Biol Chem. 2007;282:27155–64.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Triggiani M, Granata F, Frattini A, Marone G. Activation of human inflammatory cells by secreted phospholipases A2. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2006;1761:1289–300.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Hussain TA, Mathew TC, Dashti AA, Asfar S, Al-Zaid N, Dashti HM. Effect of low-calorie versus low-carbohydrate ketogenic diet in type 2 diabetes. Nutrition. 2012;28:1016–21.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Feinman RD, Pogozelski WK, Astrup A, Bernstein RK, Fine EJ, Westman EC, et al. Dietary carbohydrate restriction as the first approach in diabetes management: critical review and evidence base. Nutrition. 2015;31:1–13.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


The authors sincerely thank the participants and their families for their tireless dedication. We also thank Rhonda Pierce, RD, Margaret Peoples, RD, and the UAB Bionutrition Kitchen for development and delivery of KDs, as well as the UAB Department of Emergency Medicine Research Assistant Program for their assistance with study coordination and data collection.


This work was supported by KL2TR001419-01 (CY-F) and UAB Center for Clinical and Translational Science (UL1-TR-001417).

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ceren Yarar-Fisher.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yarar-Fisher, C., Kulkarni, A., Li, J. et al. Evaluation of a ketogenic diet for improvement of neurological recovery in individuals with acute spinal cord injury: a pilot, randomized safety and feasibility trial. Spinal Cord Ser Cases 4, 88 (2018).

Download citation

Further reading


Quick links