Use an integrated knowledge translation (IKT) and theory-based approach, to (1) explore factors influencing smoking cessation behaviour among people with SCI, and (2) explore the preferred intervention and implementation options for smoking cessation interventions for persons with SCI.
Aligned with an IKT approach, an SCI organization was meaningfully engaged throughout the research process. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with people with SCI who have quit or tried to quit smoking. Barriers and facilitators to smoking cessation were extracted and deductively coded using the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) and inductively analysed. To identify intervention options, a behavioural analysis was conducted using the Behaviour Change Wheel. To identify implementation options, modes of delivery and intervention messengers were extracted. Modes of delivery were deductively coded, and themes relating to intervention messengers were constructed.
Among the 12 participants (7 males; 6 with tetraplegia), seven had quit and five had relapsed. Across the 12 interviews, 130 barriers and 218 facilitators were coded to the TDF. The prominent TDF domains were beliefs about consequences, social influences, environmental context and resources, and behavioural regulation, and served as themes in the inductive analysis. Multiple modes of delivery and intervention messengers were considered important for the delivery of smoking cessation interventions.
This study is the first to use IKT and theory-based approaches to explore factors influencing smoking cessation among persons with SCI. Findings from this study resulted in the co-development of practical recommendations for future SCI-specific smoking cessation interventions.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $21.58 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Get just this article for as long as you need it
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. The data are not publicly available due to privacy or ethical reasons.
Fast Facts and Fact Sheets. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2021. https://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/data_statistics/fact_sheets/index.htm?s_cid=osh-stu-home-spotlight-001.
Davies DS, McColl MA. Lifestyle risks for three disease outcomes in Spinal Cord Injury. Clin Rehabil. 2002;16:96–108.
Haisma JA, van der Woude LH, Stam HJ, Bergen MP, Sluis TA, Post MW, et al. Complications following spinal cord injury: occurrence and risk factors in a longitudinal study during and after inpatient rehabilitation. J Rehabil Med. 2007;39:393–8.
Lane CA, Selleck C, Chen Y, Tang Y. The impact of smoking and smoking cessation on wound healing in spinal cord–injured patients with pressure injuries. J Wound Ostomy Cont Nurs. 2016;43:483–7.
Spungen AM, Grimm DR, Lesser M, Bauman WA, Almenoff PL. Self-reported prevalence of pulmonary symptoms in subjects with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 1997;35:652–7.
Krause JS, Cao Y, Saunders LL. Changes in cigarette smoking after traumatic spinal cord injury. Rehabil Psychol. 2015;60:379–82.
Saunders LL, Krause JS, Saladin M, Carpenter MJ. Prevalence of cigarette smoking and attempts to quit in a population-based cohort with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2015;53:641–5.
Brule S, McDonald H. Health fact sheets: smoking, 2019. Government of Canada, Statistics Canada; 2020. https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/pub/82-625-x/2020001/article/00003-eng.htm.
Shiffman S, Brockwell SE, Pillitteri JL, Gitchell JG. Individual differences in adoption of treatment for smoking cessation: demographic and smoking history characteristics. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2008;93:121–31.
Michie S, Prestwich A. Are interventions theory-based? development of a theory coding scheme. Health Psychol. 2010;29:1–8.
Michie S, Atkins L, West R. The behaviour change wheel: a guide to designing interventions. Great Britain: Silverback Publishing; 2014.
Rothman AJ. “ Is there nothing more practical than a good theory?”: why innovations and advances in health behavior change will arise if interventions are used to test and refine theory. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2004;1:11.
Michie S, van Stralen MM, West R. The behaviour change wheel: a new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implement Sci. 2011;6:1–12.
Atkins L, Francis J, Islam R, O’Connor D, Patey A, Ivers N, et al. A guide to using the theoretical domains framework of behaviour change to investigate implementation problems. Implement Sci. 2017;12:1–18.
Cane J, O’Connor D, Michie S. Validation of the theoretical domains framework for use in behaviour change and implementation research. Implement Sci. 2012;7:1–17.
Gainforth HL, Hoekstra F, McKay R, McBride CB, Sweet SN, Martin Ginis KA, et al. Integrated knowledge translation guiding principles for conducting and disseminating spinal cord injury research in partnership. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2021;102:656–63.
Martin Ginis KA, Latimer-Cheung A, Corkum S, Ginis S, Anathasopoulos P, Arbour-Nicitopoulos K, et al. A case study of a community-university multidisciplinary partnership approach to increasing physical activity participation among people with spinal cord injury. Transl Behav Med. 2012;2:516–22.
Ma JK, Cheifetz O, Todd KR, Chebaro C, Phang SH, Shaw RB, et al. Co-development of a physiotherapist-delivered physical activity intervention for adults with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2020;58:778–86.
Giroux EE, Casemore S, Clarke TY, McBride CB, Wuerstl KR, Gainforth HL. Enhancing participation while aging with spinal cord injury: applying behaviour change frameworks to develop intervention recommendations. Spinal Cord. 2020;59:665–74.
Yvonne Feilzer M. Doing mixed methods research pragmatically: Implications for the rediscovery of pragmatism as a research paradigm. J Mixed Methods Res. 2009;4:6–16.
Onwuegbuzie AJ, Leech NL. On becoming a pragmatic researcher: the importance of combining quantitative and qualitative research methodologies. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2005;8:375–87.
Ellingson LL. Engaging crystallization in qualitative research: an introduction. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2009.
Tracy SJ. Qualitative quality: eight “big tent” criteria for excellent qualitative research. Qual Inq. 2010;16:837–51.
Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33:159.
Terry G, Hayfield N, Clarke V, Braun V. Thematic analysis. In: Willig C, Rogers WS, editors. The Sage handbook of qualitative research in psychology. London: SAGE; 2017.
Carey R, Evans F, Horan M, Johnston M, West R, Michie S. Mode of delivery of behaviour change interventions taxonomy version 0 (MoDTv0). 2016.
Saunders L, Newman S, Aust R, Krause JS. Qualitative study of barriers and facilitators to cigarette smoking after spinal cord injury. Rehabil Psychol. 2018;63:400–7.
Anderson D, Dumont S, Azzaria L, Bourdais ML, Noreau L. Determinants of return to work among spinal cord injury patients: a literature review. J Vocat Rehabil. 2007;27:57–68.
Nilsen P. Making sense of implementation theories, models and Frameworks. Implement Sci. 2015;10:53–79.
Michie SF, West R, Campbell R, Brown J, Gainforth HL. ABC of behaviour change theories. Sutton: Silverback; 2014.
Schwarzer R, Lippke S, Luszczynska A. Mechanisms of health behavior change in persons with chronic illness or disability: the Health Action Process Approach (HAPA). Rehabil Psychol. 2011;56:161–70.
We would like to acknowledge Emily Stone, Jiawin Lim, Lexington Kinnear, and Kylie Lundberg-Dorr for their help with interview transcription. We would also like to acknowledge Spinal Cord Injury British Columbia for their efforts with recruitment. The research team also acknowledges all participants for their time participating in the interviews.
HLG is supported by a Michael Smith Health Research BC Scholar Award (Formerly MSFHR, Canada, no. 16910). KRW is supported by a CIHR Frederick Banting and Charles Best Canada Graduate Scholarship—Doctoral Award (no. 175909).
The authors declare no competing interests.
We certify that all applicable institutional and governmental regulations concerning the ethical use of human volunteers were followed during the course of this research. Ethics approval for this study was obtained from the University of British Columbia Okanagan Behavioural Research Ethics Board (#H19–01020).
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Wuerstl, K.R., McBride, C.B., Deschênes-Bilodeau, J. et al. Exploring smoking cessation experiences among persons with spinal cord injury: Informing theory-based recommendations for interventions. Spinal Cord 61, 27–36 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41393-022-00856-0