Cohort comparative study.
Evaluate the suitability of satisfaction scores for the assessment of quality of care and service in spinal rehabilitation.
Spinal rehabilitation department.
Fifty-two inpatients participated anonymously in a large satisfaction survey, in 2017. A questionnaire containing the same questions was completed by 96 other inpatients, whose personal details were known, admitted to the same department between 2017 and 2019. Differences in satisfaction scores were compared between the two groups, between years, and between identified patients with differences in perceived progress and satisfaction with progress, using Mann–Whitney tests. In the identified patients, the association between satisfaction and patient demographic, neurological, and functional characteristics was evaluated using Pearson correlations. Analysis of variance and t test assessed the effect of comorbidities on satisfaction. T test assessed gender differences between groups. The effect of associated factors on satisfaction was examined using a stepwise linear regression.
The total satisfaction score was 86.05 ± 16.99 for the anonymous group and 88.75 ± 12.45 for the identified patients (p > 0.05). The only patient characteristics that were associated with satisfaction were years of education, the perception of progress during rehabilitation, and the satisfaction with progress (p < 0.02). Their contribution to the total satisfaction variance, however, was relatively small (R2 = 0.211).
The small effect of patient characteristics on total satisfaction indicates that satisfaction scores can be used to assess the quality of care and service in spinal rehabilitation. This and the similarity in findings between the groups supports the validity of the questionnaires.
Your institute does not have access to this article
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
only $9.92 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
The datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Johnston R. The zone of tolerance: exploring the relationship between service transactions and satisfaction with the overall service. Int J Serv Ind Manag. 1995;6:46–61.
Gogoi D, Jyoti B. Service quality measure: how it impacts customer satisfaction and loyalty. Int J Manag. 2020;11:354–65.
Kitano CPT, Kawakami M, Fukui D, Ishimoto Y, Nagata K, Yamada H, et al. Preoperative psychological factors affecting surgical satisfaction of elderly patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. J Orthop Sci. 2020;25:751–6.
Post MWM, van Asbeck FWA, van Dijk AJ, Schrijvers AJ. Services for spinal cord injured: availability and satisfaction. Spinal Cord. 1997;35:109–15.
Ronca E, Scheel-Sailer A, Koch HG, Essig S, Brach M, Münzel N, et al. Satisfaction with access and quality of healthcare services for people with spinal cord injury living in the community. J Spinal Cord Med. 2020;43:111.
Lusilla-Palacios P, Castellano-Tejedor C. Acute spinal cord injury patients’ satisfaction with care: Results from an intervention study in a specialized rehabilitation unit. J Health Psychol. 2017;22:1289–99.
Johnson BC, Vasquez-Montes D, Steinmetz L, Buckland AJ, Bendo JA, Goldstein JA, et al. Association between nonmodifiable demographic factors and patient satisfaction scores in spine surgery clinics. Orthopedics. 2019;42:143–8.
Dijkers M. Correlates of life satisfaction among persons with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Rehab. 1999;80:867–76.
Arraras JI, Illarramendi JJ, Viudez A. Determinants of patient satisfaction with care in a Spanish oncology day hospital and its relationship with quality of life. Psychooncology. 2013;22:2454–61.
Chow A, Mayer EK, Darzi AW, Athanasiou T. Patient-reported outcome measures: the importance of patient satisfaction in surgery. Surgery. 2009;146:435–43.
Ware JE, Snyder MK, Wright WR, Davies AR. Defining and measuring patient satisfaction with medical care. Eval Program Plann. 1983;6:247–63.
Covinsky KE, Rosenthal GE, Chren MM, Justice AC, Fortinsky RH, Palmer RM, et al. The relation between health status changes and patient satisfaction in older hospitalized medical patients. J Gen Intern Med. 1998;13:223–9.
Hoff RA, Rosenheck RA, Meterko M, Wilson NJ. Mental illness as a predictor of satisfaction with inpatient care at Veterans Affairs hospitals. Psychiatr Serv. 1999;50:680–5.
Pitrou I, Berbiche D, Vasiliadis HM. Mental health and satisfaction with primary care services in older adults: a study from the patient perspective on four dimensions of care. Fam Pract. 2020;37:459–64.
Winter PL, Keith RA. A model of outpatient satisfaction in rehabilitation. Rehabil Psychol. 1988;33:131–42.
Leung J, Fereday S, Sticpewich B, Stroud K. Factors influencing the overall satisfaction in patients with severe brain injury with physiotherapy services during inpatient rehabilitation. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2018;33:E56–63.
Algudairi G, Al-Eisa ES, Alghadir AH, Iqbal ZA. Patient satisfaction with outpatient physical therapy in Saudi Arabia. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18:888.
Luthy C, Francis Gerstel P, Pugliesi A, Piguet V, Allaz AF, Cedraschi C, et al. Bedside or not bedside: Evaluation of patient satisfaction in intensive medical rehabilitation wards. PLoS ONE. 2017;12:e0170474.
Holmøy T, Hanssen KT, Beiske AG. Patient satisfaction in rehabilitation of patients with multiple sclerosis. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2012;132:523–6.
Hansson EE, Beckman A, Wihlborg A, Persson S, Troein M. Satisfaction with rehabilitation in relation to self-perceived quality of life and function among patients with stroke - a 12 month follow-up. Scand J Caring Sci. 2013;27:373–9.
Khosravi S, Khayyamfar A, Shemshadi M, Koltapeh MP, Sadeghi-Naini M, Ghodsi Z, et al. Indicators of quality of care in individuals with traumatic spinal cord injury: a scoping review. Glob Spine J 2022;12:166–81.
Marino RJ, Barros T, Biering-Sorensen F, Burns SP, Donovan WH, Graves DE, et al. International standards for neurological classification of spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med. 2003;26 suppl. 1:S50–6.
Catz A, Itzkovich M, Tesio L, Biering-Sorensen F, Weeks C, Laramee MT, et al. A multi-center international study on the spinal cord independence measure, version III: Rasch psychometricvalidation. Spinal Cord. 2007;45:275–91.
Scivoletto G, Glass C, Kim A, Galili T, Benjamin Y, Front L, et al. An international age and gender controlled model for the spinal cord injury ability realization measurement index (SCI-ARMI). Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2015;29:25–32.
Jörgensen S, Hedgren L, Sundelin A, Lexell J. Global and domain-specific life satisfaction among older adults with long-term spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med. 2021;44:322–30.
Kennedy P, Smithson E, McClelland M, Short D, Royle J, Wilson C, et al. Life satisfaction, appraisals and functional outcomes in spinal cord-injured people living in the community. Spinal Cord. 2010;48:144–8.
Tonack M, Hitzig SL, Craven BC, Campbell KA, Boschen KA, McGillivray CF, et al. Predicting life satisfaction after spinal cord injury in a Canadian sample. Spinal Cord. 2008;46:380–5.
Post MWM, van Dijk AJ, van Asbeck FWA, Schrijvers AJ. Life satisfaction of persons with spinal cord injurycompared to a population group. Scand J Rehab Med. 1998;30:23–30.
Van Leeuwen CMC, Post MWM, van Asbeck FWA, Bongers-Janssen HM, van der Woude LH, de Groot S, et al. Life satisfaction in people with spinal cord injury during the first five years after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34:76–83.
Tasiemski T, Kujawa J, Tederko P, Rubinelli S, Middleton JW, Craig A, et al. Comparison of life satisfaction in persons with spinal cord injury living in 22 countries with different economic status. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2021;102:1–27. online ahead of print.
We would like to thank Ms. Aida Dinia from Loewenstein Rehabilitation Medical Center, Ms. Polina Mikshevski from the service division of Clalit Health Services, and Ms. Zina Shatz, for their valuable assistance with the data analysis.
This study was supported by Loewenstein Rehabilitation Medical Center research fund KM600010275.
The authors declare no competing interests.
The study (0036-16-LOE) was approved by the local ethics committee, in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Michaeli, D., Kfir, A., Elkayam, K. et al. Satisfaction scores can be used to assess the quality of care and service in spinal rehabilitation. Spinal Cord (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41393-022-00819-5