Psychometric study based on retrospectively collected data.
Development of a pressure injury (PI) risk screening instrument for use during spinal cord injury (SCI) rehabilitation.
Tertiary rehabilitation center.
Medical charts of 807 inpatients participating in SCI rehabilitation were reviewed. Two models (recursive partitioning and logistic regression) were developed with demographic and Functional Independence Measure (FIM) variables and compared with the SCI Pressure Ulcer Scale (SCIPUS, n = 603) and Braden scale (n = 100) using modeling (n = 615) and validation (n = 192) datasets. Sensitivity and specificity analyses were completed for each model. Models yielding high sensitivity and area under the curve (AUC), while minimizing false negatives (FN < 0.5%) were preferred.
In the modeling dataset, a single dichotomized FIM variable, Bed/Chair Transfers <4, was predictive of PI incidence (sensitivity = 97%, AUC = 74%, FN = 0.49%) and had similar metrics as the logistic regression model (sensitivity = 97%, AUC = 76%, FN = 0.49%). The recursive partitioning model had fewer FN (sensitivity = 98%, AUC = 75%, FN = 0.33%). When applied to the validation dataset, both models performed similarly. The SCIPUS performed poorly (AUC < 70%). When analyses were limited to cases with available Braden data and no admission PI, recursive partitioning outperformed the other methods for PI risk screening.
A recursive partitioning model, named the SCI-PreSORS (SCI Pressure Sore Onset Risk Screening), demonstrated promise for PI risk screening during inpatient SCI rehabilitation. Prospective validation of the new model is warranted.
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
only $24.92 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Rent or Buy article
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Richard-Denis A, Thompson C, Bourassa-Moreau E, Parent S, Mac-Thiong JM. Does the acute care spinal cord injury setting predict the occurrence of pressure ulcers at arrival to intensive rehabilitation centers? Am J Phys Med Rehabilit. 2016;95:300–8.
Ash D. An exploration of the occurrence of pressure ulcers in a British spinal injuries unit. J Clin Nurs. 2002;11:470–8.
Young JS, Burns PE. Pressure sores and the spinal cord injured. In: Young JS, Burns PE, Bowen AM, McCutchen R, editors. Spinal cord injury statistics: experience of the regional spinal cord injury systems. Phoenix, AZ: Good Samaritan Medical Center; 1982. p. 95–105.
New PW, Rawicki HB, Bailey MJ. Nontraumatic spinal cord injury rehabilitation: pressure ulcer patterns, prediction, and impact. Arch Phys Med Rehabilit. 2004;85:87–93.
Verschueren JH, Post MW, de Groot S, van der Woude LH, van Asbeck FW, Rol M. Occurrence and predictors of pressure ulcers during primary in-patient spinal cord injury rehabilitation. Spinal Cord. 2011;49:106–12.
Salzberg CA, Byrne DW, Kabir R, van Niewerburg P, Cayten CG. Predicting pressure ulcers during initial hospitalization for acute spinal cord injury. Wounds. 1999;11:45–57.
Delparte JJ, Scovil CY, Flett HM, Higgins J, Laramee MT, Burns AS. Psychometric properties of the spinal cord injury pressure ulcer scale (SCIPUS) for pressure ulcer risk assessment during inpatient rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabilit. 2015;96:1980–5.
Gelis A, Dupeyron A, Legros P, Benaim C, Pelissier J, Fattal C. Pressure ulcer risk factors in persons with SCI: Part I: Acute and rehabilitation stages. Spinal Cord. 2009;47:99–107.
DiVita MA, Granger CV, Goldstein R, Niewczyk P, Freudenheim JL. Risk factors for development of new or worsened pressure ulcers among patients in inpatient rehabilitation facilities in the united states: data from the uniform data system for medical rehabilitation. Pm r. 2015;7:599–612.
Scheel-Sailer A, Wyss A, Boldt C, Post MW, Lay V. Prevalence, location, grade of pressure ulcers and association with specific patient characteristics in adult spinal cord injury patients during the hospital stay: a prospective cohort study. Spinal Cord. 2013;51:828–33.
DeJong G, Hsieh CH, Brown P, Smout RJ, Horn SD, Ballard P, et al. Factors associated with pressure ulcer risk in spinal cord injury rehabilitation. Am J Phys Med Rehabilit. 2014;93:971–86.
Wang LH, Chen HL, Yan HY, Gao JH, Wang F, Ming Y, et al. Inter-rater reliability of three most commonly used pressure ulcer risk assessment scales in clinical practice. Int Wound J. 2015;12:590–4.
Sardo P, Simoes C, Alvarelhao J, Costa C, Simoes CJ, Figueira J, et al. Pressure ulcer risk assessment: retrospective analysis of Braden Scale scores in Portuguese hospitalised adult patients. J Clin Nurs. 2015;24:3165–76.
Weir-Hughes D. Editorial: pressure ulcer prevention: is it time to accept the need for universal precautions. J Clin Nurs. 2016;25:287–8.
Anthony D, Papanikolaou P, Parboteeah S, Saleh M. Do risk assessment scales for pressure ulcers work? J Tissue Viability. 2010;19:132–6.
Choi J, Choi J, Kim H. Nurses’ interpretation of patient status descriptions on the Braden Scale. Clin Nurs Res. 2014;23:336–46.
Houghton PE, Campbell KE, CPG Panel. Canadian best practice guidelines for the prevention and management of pressure ulcers in people with spinal cord injury. 2013. http://onf.org/system/attachments/168/original/Pressure_Ulcers_Best_Practice_Guideline_Final_web4.pdf.
Mortenson WB, Miller WC. A review of scales for assessing the risk of developing a pressure ulcer in individuals with SCI. Spinal Cord. 2008;46:168–75.
Salzberg CA, Byrne DW, Cayten CG, van Niewerburgh P, Murphy JG, Viehbeck M. A new pressure ulcer risk assessment scale for individuals with spinal cord injury. Am J Phys Med Rehabilit. 1996;75:96–104.
Krishnan S, Brick RS, Karg PE, Tzen YT, Garber SL, Sowa GA, et al. Predictive validity of the Spinal Cord Injury Pressure Ulcer Scale (SCIPUS) in acute care and inpatient rehabilitation in individuals with traumatic spinal cord injury. NeuroRehabilitation. 2016;38:401–9.
Scovil CY, Flett HM, McMillan LT, Delparte JJ, Leber DJ, Brown J, et al. The application of implementation science for pressure ulcer prevention best practices in an inpatient spinal cord injury rehabilitation program. J Spinal Cord Med. 2014;37:589–97.
Keith RA, Granger CV, Hamilton BB, Sherwin FS. The functional independence measure: a new tool for rehabilitation. Adv Clin Rehabilit. 1987;1:6–18.
Prodinger B, O’Connor RJ, Stucki G, Tennant A. Establishing score equivalence of the Functional Independence Measure motor scale and the Barthel Index, utilising the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health and Rasch measurement theory. J Rehabilit Med. 2017;49:416–22.
Bergstrom N, Braden BJ, Laguzza A, Holman V. The braden scale for predicting pressure sore risk. Nurs Res. 1987;36:205–10.
Black J, Baharestani M, Cuddigan J, Dorner B, Edsberg L, Langemo D, et al. National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel’s updated pressure ulcer staging system. Dermatol Nurs. 2007;19:343–9. quiz 50.
Mittlbock M, Schemper M. Explained variation for logistic regression. Stat Med. 1996;15:1987–97.
Goetzinger KR, Odibo AO. Statistical analysis and interpretation of prenatal diagnostic imaging studies, Part 1: evaluating the efficiency of screening and diagnostic tests. J Ultrasound Med. 2011;30:1121–7.
Šimundić A-M. Measures of diagnostic accuracy: basic definitions. EJIFCC. 2009;19:203–11.
Wang H, Niewczyk P, Divita M, Camicia M, Appelman J, Mix J, et al. Impact of pressure ulcers on outcomes in inpatient rehabilitation facilities. Am J Phys Med Rehabilit. 2014;93:207–16.
Scovil CY, Delparte JJ, Walia S, Flett HM, Guy SD, Wallace M, et al. Implementation of pressure injury prevention best practices across 6 Canadian rehabilitation sites: results from the spinal cord injury knowledge mobilization network. Arch Phys Med Rehabilit. 2019;100:327–35.
Consortium for Spinal Cord Medicine. Pressure ulcer prevention and treatment following spinal cord injury: a clinical practice guideline for health-care professionals. J Spinal Cord Med. 2001;24(Suppl 1):S40–101.
Anderson K, Aito S, Atkins M, Biering-Sorensen F, Charlifue S, Curt A, et al. Functional recovery measures for spinal cord injury: an evidence-based review for clinical practice and research. J Spinal Cord Med. 2008;31:133–44.
The study was funded through a partnership of the Rick Hansen Institute and the Ontario Neurotrauma Foundation. Grants # 2010-RHI-ONF-BPI-832, 2015-RHI-BPI-996.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
We certify that all applicable institutional and governmental regulations concerning the ethical use of human volunteers/animals were followed during the course of this research. All study procedures were reviewed by the TRI-UHN REB (#12-0543-DE).
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Delparte, J.J., Flett, H.M., Scovil, C.Y. et al. Development of the spinal cord injury pressure sore onset risk screening (SCI-PreSORS) instrument: a pressure injury risk decision tree for spinal cord injury rehabilitation. Spinal Cord (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41393-020-0510-y