A cross-sectional study.
To examine psychometric properties, including internal consistency, construct validity, and test–retest reliability, of the Thai version of the International Spinal Cord Injury (ISCI) Quality of Life Basic Data Set (QoL-BDS).
Outpatient rehabilitation clinic, urodynamic clinic, and rehabilitation ward at Maharaj Nakorn Chiang Mai Hospital.
Participants were assigned to complete two assessment tools, the Thai version of QoL-BDS which consisted of three single items on satisfaction with life as a whole, physical health and psychological health, and the Thai version of the World Health Organization Quality of Life instrument (WHOQOL-BREF) completed by face to face interview. After 2 weeks, the participants were evaluated the QoL-BDS again via telephone interviewing to assess test–retest reliability.
One hundred and thirty people with spinal cord injury (SCI) were included in the study. Of all participants, 103 people had a traumatic SCI. The mean (SD) age was 43.0 (13.1) years and the median (IQR) time after SCI was 7.5 (1–14) years. The Thai version of QoL-BDS had good internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.89), fair to good construct validity (Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient of 0.43–0.57, p < 0.01) and good to excellent test–retest reliability (Intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.73–0.86).
The Thai version of QoL-BDS had acceptable psychometric properties. As it is concise, QoL-BDS should be encouraged in healthcare providers to investigate QoL in people with SCI, especially in middle-income countries.
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
only $30.08 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Rent or Buy article
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Cieza A, Kirchberger I, Biering-Sorensen F, Baumberger M, Charlifue S, Post MW, et al. ICF Core Sets for individuals with spinal cord injury in the long-term context. Spinal Cord. 2010;48:305–12.
Migliorini CE, New PW, Tonge BJ. Quality of life in adults with spinal cord injury living in the community. Spinal Cord. 2011;49:365–70.
Tulsky DS, Kisala PA, Victorson D, Tate DG, Heinemann AW, Charlifue S, et al. Overview of the Spinal Cord Injury-Quality of Life (SCI-QOL) measurement system. J Spinal Cord Med. 2015;38:257–69.
Hill MR, Noonan VK, Sakakibara BM, Miller WC. SCIRE Research team. Quality of life instruments and definitions in individuals with spinal cord injury: a systematic review. Spinal Cord. 2010;48:438–50.
Whitehurst DG, Noonan VK, Dvorak MF, Bryan S. A review of preference-based health-related quality of life questionnaires in spinal cord injury research. Spinal Cord. 2012;50:646–54.
Hwang HF, Liang WM, Chiu YN, Lin MR. Suitability of the WHOQOL-BREF for community-dwelling older people in Taiwan. Age Ageing. 2003;32:593–600.
Charlifue S, Post MW, Biering-Sorensen F, Catz A, Dijkers M, Geyh S, et al. International Spinal Cord Injury Quality of Life Basic Data Set. Spinal Cord. 2012;50:672–5.
Biering-Sorensen F, Charlifue S, DeVivo M, Noonan V, Post M, Stripling T, et al. International Spinal Cord Injury Data Sets. Spinal Cord. 2006;44:530–4.
Post MW, Adriaansen JJ, Charlifue S, Biering-Sorensen F, van Asbeck FW. Good validity of the international spinal cord injury quality of life basic data set. Spinal Cord. 2016;54:314–8.
New PW, Tate DG, Forchheimer MB, D’Andrea Greve JM, Parashar D, Post MWM. Preliminary psychometric analyses of the International Spinal Cord Injury Quality of Life Basic Data Set. Spinal Cord. 2019;57:789–95.
Post MWM, Forchheimer MB, Charlifue S, D’Andrea Greve JM, New PW, Tate DG. Reproducibility of the international spinal cord injury quality of life basic data set: an international psychometric study. Spinal Cord. 2019;57:992–8.
Post MW, Nooijen CF, Postma K, Dekkers J, Penninx F, van den Berg-Emons RJ, et al. People with spinal cord injury in the Netherlands. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2017;96(2 Suppl 1):S93–5.
Richards C, MacKenzie N, Roberts S, Escorpizo R. People with spinal cord injury in the United States. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2017;96(2 Suppl 1):S124–S126.
Kovindha A. People with spinal cord injury in Thailand. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2017;96(2 Suppl 1):S120–3.
Biering-Sorensen F, Alexander MS, Burns S, Charlifue S, DeVivo M, Dietz V, et al. Recommendations for translation and reliability testing of International Spinal Cord Injury Data Sets. Spinal Cord. 2011;49:357–60.
Bonett DG, Wright TA. Sample size requirements for estimating pearson, kendall and spearman correlations. Psychometrika. 2000;65:23–8.
Biering-Sorensen F, DeVivo MJ, Charlifue S, Chen Y, New PW, Noonan V, et al. International Spinal Cord Injury Core Data Set (version 2.0)-including standardization of reporting. Spinal Cord. 2017;55:759–64.
DeVivo M, Biering-Sorensen F, Charlifue S, Noonan V, Post M, Stripling T, et al. International Spinal Cord Injury Core Data Set. Spinal Cord. 2006;44:535–40.
Phungrassami T, Katikarn R, Watanaarepornchai S, Sangtawan D. Quality of life assessment in radiotherapy patients by WHOQOL-BREF-THAI: a feasibility study. J Med Assoc Thai. 2004;87:1459–65.
Sakthong P, Schommer JC, Gross CR, Sakulbumrungsil R, Prasithsirikul W. Psychometric properties of WHOQOL-BREF-THAI in patients with HIV/AIDS. J Med Assoc Thai. 2007;90:2449–60.
McHorney CA, Tarlov AR. Individual-patient monitoring in clinical practice: are available health status surveys adequate? Qual Life Res. 1995;4:293–307.
Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, van der Windt DA, Knol DL, Dekker J, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60:34–42.
Wongsa S, Tongprasert S, Kovindha A. Quality of life of primary caregivers of disabled people with spinal cord injury by using Short Form-36 Questionnaire. J Thai Rehabil Med. 2011;21:28–33.
Lucke KT, Cocia H, Lucke JF. Quality of life in spinal cord injured individuals and their caregivers during the initial 6 months following rehabilitation. Qual Life Res. 2004;13:97–110.
Elfstrom ML, Kreuter M, Ryden A, Persson LO, Sullivan M. Effects of coping on psychological outcome when controlling for background variables: a study of traumatically spinal cord lesioned persons. Spinal Cord. 2002;40:408–15.
Manns PJ, Chad KE. Determining the relation between quality of life, handicap, fitness, and physical activity for persons with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999;80:1566–71.
The authors would like to thank Ms Rodchana Janpueak, a research administrator of Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, for providing statistical advices, as well as Associate Professor Jakkrit Klaphajone, an associate professor of rehabilitation medicine and an English specialist of Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, for English proofreading and correction.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand and was in accordance with the current version of the Helsinki Declaration. The study number is REH-2560-04814. The authors certify that all applicable institutional and governmental regulations concerning the ethical use of human volunteers were followed during all course of this study.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Pattanakuhar, S., Suttinoon, L., Wongpakaran, T. et al. The reliability and validity of the International Spinal Cord Injury Quality of Life Basic Data set in people with spinal cord injuries from a middle-income country: a psychometric study of the Thai version. Spinal Cord (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41393-020-0468-9