The case for revisiting central cord syndrome

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    Badhiwala JH, Wilson JR, Fehlings MG. Global burden of traumatic brain and spinal cord injury. Lancet Neurol. 2019;18:24–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Schneider RC, Cherry G, Pantek H. The syndrome of acute central cervical spinal cord injury; with special reference to the mechanisms involved in hyperextension injuries of cervical spine. J Neurosurg. 1954;11:546–77.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Pouw MH, van Middendorp JJ, van Kampen A, Hirschfeld S, Veth RP, group E-Ss. et al. Diagnostic criteria of traumatic central cord syndrome. Part 1: a systematic review of clinical descriptors and scores. Spinal Cord. 2010;48:652–6.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    van Middendorp JJ, Pouw MH, Hayes KC, Williams R, Chhabra HS, Putz C, et al. Diagnostic criteria of traumatic central cord syndrome. Part 2: a questionnaire survey among spine specialists. Spinal Cord. 2010;48:657–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Pouw MH, van Middendorp JJ, van Kampen A, Curt A, van de Meent H, Hosman AJ. Diagnostic criteria of traumatic central cord syndrome. Part 3: descriptive analyses of neurological and functional outcomes in a prospective cohort of traumatic motor incomplete tetraplegics. Spinal Cord. 2011;49:614–22.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Schneider RC, Crosby EC, Russo RH, Gosch HH. Traumatic spinal cord syndromes and their management. Clin Neurosurg. 1973;20:424–92.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Foerster O. Symptomatologie der erkrankungen des rückenmarks und seiner wurzeln. In: Bumke O, Foerster O editors. Handbook of neurology, vol. 5. Springer: Berlin; 1936. p. 83.

    Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Pappas CT, Gibson AR, Sonntag VK. Decussation of hind-limb and fore-limb fibers in the monkey corticospinal tract: relevance to cruciate paralysis. J Neurosurg. 1991;75:935–40.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Coxe WS, Landau WM. Patterns of Marchi degeneration in the monkey pyramidal tract following small discrete cortical lesions. Neurology. 1970;20:89–100.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Quencer RM, Bunge RP, Egnor M, Green BA, Puckett W, Naidich TP, et al. Acute traumatic central cord syndrome: MRI-pathological correlations. Neuroradiology. 1992;34:85–94.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Lawrence DG, Kuypers HG. The functional organization of the motor system in the monkey. I. The effects of bilateral pyramidal lesions. Brain. 1968;91:1–14.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Levi AD, Tator CH, Bunge RP. Clinical syndromes associated with disproportionate weakness of the upper versus the lower extremities after cervical spinal cord injury. Neurosurgery. 1996;38:179–83. discussion183-5

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Lenehan B, Fisher C, Vaccaro A, Fehlings M, Aarabi B, Dvorak M. The urgency of surgical decompression in acute central cord injuries with spondylosis and without instability. Spine. 2010;35:S180–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Fehlings MG, Tetreault LA, Wilson JR, Aarabi B, Anderson P, Arnold PM, et al. A clinical practice guideline for the management of patients with acute spinal cord injury and central cord syndrome: recommendations on the timing (</=24 h versus >24 h) of decompressive surgery. Glob Spine J. 2017;7(3 Suppl):195S–202S.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Wilson JR, Tetreault LA, Kwon BK, Arnold PM, Mroz TE, Shaffrey C, et al. Timing of decompression in patients with acute spinal cord injury: a systematic review. Glob Spine J. 2017;7(3 Suppl):95S–115S.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Dvorak MF, Fisher CG, Hoekema J, Boyd M, Noonan V, Wing PC, et al. Factors predicting motor recovery and functional outcome after traumatic central cord syndrome: a long-term follow-up. Spine (Philos Pa 1976). 2005;30:2303–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

MGF wishes to acknowledge support from the Gerry and Tootsie Halbert Chair in Neural Repair and Regeneration as well as the DeZwirek Family Foundation.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

JHB conceived the work, drafted and revised the manuscript, approved the final version and agrees to be accountable for all aspects of the work. JRW revised the manuscript, approved the final version and agrees to be accountable for all aspects of the work. MGF conceived the work, revised the manuscript, approved the final version and agrees to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael G. Fehlings.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Badhiwala, J.H., Wilson, J.R. & Fehlings, M.G. The case for revisiting central cord syndrome. Spinal Cord 58, 125–127 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41393-019-0354-5

Download citation

Search