Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Comparison between esophageal and intestinal temperature responses to upper-limb exercise in individuals with spinal cord injury

Abstract

Study design

Experimental study.

Objective

Individuals with spinal cord injuries (SCI) may present with impaired sympathetic control over thermoregulatory responses to environmental and exercise stressors, which can impact regional core temperature (Tcore) measurement. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether regional differences in Tcore responses exist during exercise in individuals with SCI.

Setting

Rehabilitation centre in Wakayama, Japan.

Methods

We recruited 12 men with motor-complete SCI (7 tetraplegia, 5 paraplegia) and 5 able-bodied controls to complete a 30-min bout of arm-cycling exercise at 50% V̇O2 peak reserve. Tcore was estimated using telemetric pills (intestinal temperature; Tint) and esophageal probes (Teso). Heat storage was calculated from baseline to 15 and 30 min of exercise.

Results

At 15 min of exercise, elevations in Teso (Δ0.39 ± 0.22 °C; P < 0.05), but not Tint (Δ0.04 ± 0.18 °C; P = 0.09), were observed in able-bodied men. At 30 min of exercise, men with paraplegia and able-bodied men both exhibited increases in Teso (paraplegia: Δ0.56 ± 0.30 °C, P < 0.05; able-bodied men: Δ0.60 ± 0.31 °C, P < 0.05) and Tint (paraplegia: Δ0.38 ± 0.33 °C, P < 0.05; able-bodied men: Δ0.30 ± 0.30 °C, P < 0.05). Teso began rising 7.2 min earlier than Tint (pooled, P < 0.01). Heat storage estimated by Teso was greater than heat storage estimated by Tint at 15 min (P = 0.02) and 30 min (P = 0.03) in men with paraplegia. No elevations in Teso, Tint, or heat storage were observed in men with tetraplegia.

Conclusions

While not interchangeable, both Teso and Tint are sensitive to elevations in Tcore during arm-cycling exercise in men with paraplegia, although Teso may have superior sensitivity to capture temperature information earlier during exercise.

Introduction

Exercise-induced elevations in core body temperature (Tcore) are regulated within an acceptable range by the sweating and skin blood flow responses, mediated in part by the sympathetic nervous system in a negative feedback loop [1, 2]. While this is an adaptive process in able-bodied individuals, individuals with spinal cord injuries (SCI) may present with varying degrees of autonomic dysfunction as a result of damage to the spinal cord. Altered autonomic function has been shown to impair sympathetically-mediated regulatory processes below the lesion level, such as the thermoregulatory response to heat and exercise [3, 4].

Autonomic function in SCI may differentially affect the validity and sensitivity of different temperature measurement tools through alterations in regional thermoregulatory control. Rectal and esophageal temperatures (Teso) provide close estimates of Tcore during exercise, but are restricted to “lab-based” assessments that are not feasible to measure in the field [5, 6]. Ingestible telemetric pills can provide a wireless measurement of intestinal temperature (Tint), an estimate of Tcore, and have been shown to be sensitive to heat- and exercise-related thermoregulatory challenges in both able-bodied men and individuals with SCI [7,8,9]. However, given the known differences in both gut motility [10] and abdominal skin temperature with higher level SCI [11, 12], it is unknown whether the telemetric pill provides equally sensitive assessment of Tcore in all individuals with SCI. Furthermore, much of the SCI thermoregulation research has been conducted in athletes with SCI [7, 11, 13,14,15,16], with relatively little knowledge on the generalizability of methods to untrained adults with SCI who may have altered thermoregulatory sensitivity to exercise [17] and lower levels of heat production related to reduced aerobic capacity [18]. The ability to rely on non-invasive methods to estimate exercise- or environment-induced Tcore elevations is particularly important to untrained adults with SCI who are not habitually exposed to temperature stressors, and therefore may be at elevated risk for heat stress exposure.

The purpose of this study was to investigate whether Tint and Teso provide comparable information about the thermoregulatory response to upper-limb exercise in untrained men with paraplegia and tetraplegia. To simulate realistic exercise conditions in this population, Tcore sensitivity was tested during arm cycling at 50% of V̇O2 peak reserve, corresponding to moderate-to-vigorous intensity exercise recommended by the latest physical activity guidelines for adults with SCI [19]. Based on previous work in able-bodied individuals [9], we hypothesized that Tint and Teso would both reflect exercise-related elevations in Tcore in individuals with paraplegia and tetraplegia.

Methods

Experimental design

Seventeen men were recruited for this study: seven individuals with tetraplegia, five individuals with paraplegia, and five able-bodied controls (Table 1 for participant characteristics). Participants were asked to come to the laboratory for two separate visits for a baseline testing session, as well as an acute exercise trial. During the first visit, degree of autonomic dysfunction was assessed by sympathetic skin responses (SSR) and the sit-up test to identify orthostatic hypotension (OH), followed by a graded arm exercise test to exhaustion. At the second visit, participants performed 30 min of arm cycling exercise at 50% V̇O2 peak, during which Tcore and skin temperature (Tsk) were recorded throughout. The testing environment was maintained at 25 °C at a relative humidity of 50%.

Table 1 Participant characteristics

Sympathetic skin responses

SSR testing was completed as previously described [20, 21], with modification. In the supine position, electrodes were placed on the dorsal and ventral sides of the left hand and foot, and were attached to a commercial data acquisition unit (PowerLab 26T (LTS), AD Instruments, Colorado Springs, CO, USA). In 30–40 s intervals, electrical stimulation was applied to the left median nerve, the left posterior tibial nerve, and the left supra-orbital nerve, in series. Five stimuli were applied at each nerve, with the pulse amplitude set to a threshold where a motor response could be elicited (12–20 mA, 0.2 ms, single pulse). The presence or absence of a response was noted for each stimulation, which were summated at each site for SSR scoring.

Sit-up test

Participants were instrumented with an oscillometric blood pressure cuff (STBP-780, Colin, Komaki, Japan), and electrocardiogram for impedance estimation (PhysioFlow®, NeuMeDx, Bristol, PA, USA). Participants were instructed to maintain a breathing rate of 15 breaths/min, timed to a metronome, to account for respiratory sinus arrhythmia. After 5 min of supine measurement, participants were passively sat up in a reclinable chair to a seated position for 15 min. Automated oscillometric blood pressure was recorded every minute, or until participant demonstrated signs of syncope. OH was defined as a drop in systolic blood pressure (SBP) of ≥20 mmHg, or a drop in diastolic blood pressure (DBP) of ≥10 mmHg [22].

V̇O2 peak testing

Peak oxygen consumption (V̇O2 peak) was assessed with a graded arm cycling test to volitional exhaustion. After 10 min of rest, participants were instructed to cycle at 50 rpm on a manually-braked arm ergometer (Monark Rehab Trainer 881E; Monark Exercise AB, Varberg, Sweden) at 0, 5, and 10 W for 3-min intervals, thereafter increasing the power output by 5 W/min for individuals with tetraplegia or 10 W/min for both individuals with paraplegia and able-bodied controls until test termination (cycling rate < 40 rpm). Ventilatory data were collected with a portable metabolic unit (MetaMax 3B, Cortex, Leipzig, Germany).

Skin temperatures

Skin temperatures were measured at 10 different sites with iButton sensors (DS1922T, Maxim Integrated Products, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, USA): on the forehead and on the left side of the body at the chest, upper back, upper arm, forearm, dorsal hand, lower abdomen, anterior thigh, lateral calf, and dorsal foot. Data were sampled every 10 s, which were then averaged every minute for analysis. Tsk was averaged between the arm, forearm, and hand for upper-limb temperature, and averaged between the thigh, leg, and foot for lower-limb temperature. In the absence of SCI-specific Tsk standards, mean Tsk was calculated as per Ramanathan [23] by the following equation:

$${\mathrm{Mean}}\; {\mathrm{skin}}\; {\mathrm{temperature}} = \, \left( 0.3 \times T_{\mathrm{chest}} \right) + \left( 0.3 \times T_{\mathrm{arm}} \right) \\ + \left( 0.2 \times T_{\mathrm{thigh}} \right) + \left(0.2 \times T_{\mathrm{calf}} \right)$$

Core temperature

Core temperature was measured using both an ingestible telemetric capsule (Tint), as well as an esophageal probe (Teso). The telemetric capsule was factory-calibrated and swallowed 8–10 h prior to arrival for the acute exercise trial (e-Celsius™; BodyCap, Paris, France). Data were sampled every 30 s by a portable receiver (e-Performance; BodyCap), which were then averaged every minute for analysis. Teso was assessed by thermocouples in a polyethylene tube (PE90; Nippon Becton Dickinson Company, Tokyo, Japan), which was inserted through the right nostril and extended to the esophagus at the level of the right atria (0.25*supine length), the placement of which was confirmed via a cold-water swallow. Immediately after each exercise trial, the esophageal probe was immersed in both room temperature and 40 °C water for calibration. The delay in temperature elevation was identified between the initiation of the test and the first sustained elevation in both Teso and Tint.

Heat storage

Heat storage during exercise was calculated as per [24] by the following equation:

$${{\mathrm{Heat}}\; {\mathrm{storage}} = \left(\left( 0.8 \times \left[ \Delta T_{\mathrm{eso}}\; {\mathrm{or}}\; \Delta T_{\mathrm{int}} \right]\right) + \left( 0.2 \times \Delta T_{\mathrm{sk}} \right)\right) \times c_{b}}$$

where cb is the specific heat capacity of body tissue (3.49 J g−1 °C−1) and Tsk is the mean skin temperature as calculated from above. Heat storage was calculated from rest to each bout of exercise (ending at 15 and 30 min) for both Teso and Tint.

Exercise trial

Exercise was performed in a temperature and humidity-controlled room at 25 °C and 50% humidity. Exercise intensity was chosen to reflect the most recent physical activity guidelines for individuals with SCI [19]. After instrumentation, participants were instructed to sit quietly for 10 min of rest, followed by two 15-min bouts of exercise at 50% V̇O2 reserve [25], separated by 2 min of rest. Throughout exercise, heart rate was monitored by single-lead ECG.

Statistics

Statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics (version 20.0.0; IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Data were visually assessed for normality using histograms and statistically using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. Resting characteristics and cardiopulmonary responses to exercise were compared between groups with one-way independent ANOVAs. One-way repeated measures ANOVAs were used to assess the change in Tcore and Tsk at discrete intervals over the exercise bout within each group (i.e., timepoints: rest, 15 min, recovery, 30 min), where significant effects were followed by Tukey’s HSD post-hoc test. Paired t-tests were used to examine the difference in heat storage between measurement types. Bland–Altman analysis was used to examine the difference between Tint and Teso sensitivity during exercise, reporting the mean bias and 95% limits of agreement. Values are reported as mean ± SD unless otherwise noted. In all analyses, the level of significance was set at α = 0.05.

Results

Participant characteristics and baseline autonomic function are described in Table 1. Autonomic testing revealed that men with tetraplegia had autonomic dysfunction as they presented with the absence of SSR and presence of OH, while men with paraplegia had generally preserved upper-limb SSR responses and no OH. As a methodological control, autonomic testing was also performed on able-bodied men, indicating intact SSR responses and only one case of diastolic OH.

Peak and sub-maximal exercise responses are described in Table 2. There was a graded effect of lesion level on fitness, where men with SCI had a lower V̇O2 peak than able-bodied men (P < 0.05). During the acute exercise bout, men with SCI worked at lower power output (P < 0.05) compared to able-bodied men, while men with tetraplegia had lower heart rate responses at both 15 and 30 min of exercise (both P < 0.01), with no differences between men with paraplegia and able-bodied controls (both P > 0.90).

Table 2 Cardiorespiratory outcomes during graded exercise test and exercise bout (mean ± SD)

At rest, there were no differences between tetraplegia, paraplegia, or able-bodied men in core temperature as measured by either Tint (P = 0.14) or Teso (P = 0.35), although Teso was lower than Tint by 0.63 °C for all individuals (36.14 ± 0.36 °C vs. 36.76 ± 0.40 °C, P < 0.01). Tint and Teso demonstrated similar response patterns to exercise in men with paraplegia and able-bodied men, with both methods increasing by the end of the exercise bout (P < 0.05; Fig. 1). Teso in able-bodied men demonstrated additional sensitivity to temperature changes at the 15-min and resting timepoints, without concurrent changes in Tint. There were no elevations in either Teso (P = 0.24) or Tint (P = 0.71), in men with tetraplegia. When all groups were pooled, we observed a delay in temperature elevations, where Teso began rising 7.2 min earlier than Tint (5.2 ± 1.9 vs. 12.4 ± 6.6 min; P < 0.01). To assess the overall difference between temperature assessment sensitivity during exercise, a Bland–Altman analysis was conducted using the pooled data between the 15- and 30-min timepoints, separated by group (Fig. 2). An average bias of a 0.17 °C greater Teso response was observed, with the 95% limits of agreement ranging from −0.25 to 0.59 °C.

Fig. 1
figure1

Changes in core temperature (Tcore) during the exercise bout measured by esophageal (open circles; Teso) and intestinal (closed circles; Tint) probes. Shaded areas indicate rest periods. Plotted points are mean + SEM. *P < 0.05 different from resting temperature

Fig. 2
figure2

Bland–Altman analysis indicating systematically larger changes in Teso compared to Tint during exercise in men with tetraplegia, men with paraplegia, and able-bodied men. The difference between changes in temperature (Teso − Tint) is plotted against the range of average temperature changes, with the mean bias (0.17 °C) and 95% limits of agreement (−0.25 to 0.59 °C) indicated by dashed lines

Average upper limb skin temperature did not significantly change from rest in any group (P > 0.05; Fig. 3), although forearm temperature exhibited a time × group interaction (P < 0.01), where temperature decreased in men with tetraplegia throughout the entire exercise bout (Δ −1.80 °C from rest to 30 min; all P < 0.05). In contrast, lower limb skin temperature demonstrated a main effect for time (P < 0.01) where temperatures were lower during the exercise bout than during baseline rest for all participants (Δ −0.49 °C from rest to 30 min; all P < 0.05; Fig. 3).

Fig. 3
figure3

Changes in upper (top) and lower (bottom) skin temperature (Tsk) during the exercise bout in individuals with tetraplegia (open triangles), paraplegia (open circles), and able-bodied men (closed circles). Shaded areas indicate rest periods. Plotted points are mean + SEM. P < 0.05 all groups different from resting temperature

Heat storage was increased when estimated from Teso compared to Tint after the first 15 min of exercise in both men with paraplegia and able-bodied controls (P < 0.05; Fig. 4). After the second bout of exercise, heat storage estimated by Teso was only greater in men with paraplegia (P = 0.03). Heat storage increased from the first bout to the second bout only in men with paraplegia (Teso estimate P = 0.03; Tint estimate P < 0.01). There were no differences between heat storage method estimates or heat storage over time in men with tetraplegia (P > 0.05).

Fig. 4
figure4

Differences in heat storage estimated from esophageal (Teso) and intestinal (Tint) temperatures after the first and second bouts of exercise in a men with tetraplegia, b men with paraplegia, and c able-bodied men. Mean ± SE. *P < 0.05 different vs. Teso; P < 0.05 different vs. 15 min

Discussion

We investigated whether two regional indicators of Tcore demonstrate similar responses during normothermic exercise in individuals with different levels of SCI. The primary findings were: (1) amongst able-bodied men and men with paraplegia, both Teso and Tint were sensitive to Tcore elevations during exercise in normothermia, with further Teso sensitivity in able-bodied men earlier during exercise; and (2) individuals with tetraplegia demonstrated signs of autonomic dysfunction at rest, and had no elevations in Teso or Tint during 30 min of cycling at an intensity reflecting recommended workloads for healthy habitual physical activity. Our results indicate that Tint and Teso can provide similar estimates of Tcore elevation during moderate-intensity arm-cycling exercise in men with paraplegia, although our able-bodied data indicates Teso likely has superior sensitivity to capture temperature information earlier during exercise.

The use of telemetric pills provides a non-invasive estimate of Tcore which can be used for field assessments of thermoregulation during exercise in able-bodied individuals [9, 26, 27]. Ambulatory temperature monitoring is particularly important for individuals with SCI who may have temperature dysregulation secondary to autonomic dysfunction and are therefore at elevated risk for heat-related illness. Here, we report similar sensitivity in simultaneously measured Teso and Tint during upper limb exercise in individuals with paraplegia and able-bodied men. Teso demonstrated an earlier rise during exercise, indicating rapid sensitivity to brief elevations in Tcore. These findings agree with previous reports in able-bodied men that longer exercise durations are required to achieve a 0.1 °C change in Tint compared to Teso [28]. Circulating blood from the active limbs likely contributes to the robust temperature sensitivity, as warmed venous return from the working limbs directly impacts temperature conduction through the pulmonary artery to the level of the esophageal probe. Upper-limb exercise also results in greater heat production due to poor work efficiency (compared to the lower limbs), as well as less afferent input to the central nervous system resulting in greater heat storage [18]. It has been previously suggested that Tint might be impacted by the location of the pill in the intestinal tract, and as such, there have been recommendations to standardize pill ingestion 6 h prior to measurement time for optimal intestinal transit time [9]. It is, however, unknown whether these assumptions hold true for individuals with SCI who have slower colon transit time (previously reported as SCI: 0.63 ± 0.33 cm/h, controls: 2.58 ± 1.20 cm/h) [29] and autonomically-mediated peristaltic dysfunction [30]. Previous studies in able-bodied men and athletes with SCI have demonstrated minimal differences between Tcore estimations using esophageal, intestinal, or rectal probes during high-intensity exercise [27, 31]. Our findings are likely specific to individuals with SCI with poor aerobic fitness performing moderate-intensity exercise, which represents the fitness and activity of the majority of untrained adults with SCI [32]. It is unknown whether exercise in heat or longer duration exercise would diminish observed differences between methods in men with paraplegia, although an exercise duration of 30 min is a realistic and relevant physiological challenge for most individuals with SCI.

While the thermoregulatory responses to prolonged exercise have previously been documented in athletes with SCI [7, 8, 11, 13,14,15,16, 31, 33, 34], relatively little is known about the exercise response in untrained adults with SCI, in particular, individuals with tetraplegia. Using a moderate-intensity exercise protocol recommended by national SCI physical activity guidelines [19], we observed increases in Tcore in men with paraplegia and able-bodied controls, but not in individuals with tetraplegia, likely due to lower exercise power output amongst men with tetraplegia. The exercise intensity levels in individuals with tetraplegia were likely below a threshold required to generate sufficient heat stress as evidenced by a lack of elevations in upper-limb Tsk or heat storage during exercise in a normothermic environment. Low cardiorespiratory loads at a similar relative exercise intensity were evident by both the lower exercise heart rate as well as moderate RPE scores during the final minute of exercise, likely as a result of autonomic dysfunction (i.e., lack of SSR, symptoms of OH) and low cardiorespiratory fitness. Previously, Webborn et al. [33] demonstrated robust increases in Tint in athletes with tetraplegia in response to an intermittent sprint exercise protocol on an arm ergometer, albeit at four times the power output of our untrained participants. Although our data do not indicate heat stress in men with tetraplegia and poor cardiorespiratory fitness, it remains unknown whether environmental heat stress would impact the effect of exercise on regional elevations in Tcore in this population.

Telemetric measurement of Tcore in individuals with SCI is important for the dynamic assessment of thermoregulation, a key homeostatic process that may be impaired by autonomic dysfunction following SCI. In our study, we observed similar increases in Teso and Tint during 30 min of upper-limb exercise in men with paraplegia as well as able-bodied controls. The absence of exercise-induced heat stress in men with tetraplegia, as reflected by a lack of increases in Tcore or Tsk, was likely due to limitations to aerobic capacity and low power outputs during the acute exercise. Our results indicate that Tint and Teso can provide similar estimates of Tcore elevation during moderate-intensity arm-cycling exercise in men with paraplegia.

Data availability

The datasets generated during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. 1.

    Greenleaf JE, Castle BL. Exercise temperature regulation in man during hypohydration and hyperhydration. J Appl Physiol. 1971;30:847–53.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Low DA, Keller DM, Wingo JE, Brothers RM, Crandall CG. Sympathetic nerve activity and whole body heat stress in humans. J Appl Physiol. 2011;111:1329–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Krassioukov A. Autonomic function following cervical spinal cord injury. Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 2009;169:157–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Krassioukov AV, Karlsson A-K, Wecht JM, Wuermser L-A, Mathias CJ, Marino RJ. Assessment of autonomic dysfunction following spinal cord injury: rationale for additions to International Standards for Neurological Assessment. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2007;44:103–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Shiraki K, Konda N, Sagawa S. Esophageal and tympanic temperature responses to core blood temperature changes during hyperthermia. J Appl Physiol. 1986;61:98–102.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Saltin B, Hermansen L. Esophageal, rectal, and muscle temperature during exercise. J Appl Physiol. 1966;21:1757–62.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Griggs KE, Leicht CA, Price MJ, Goosey-Tolfrey VL. Thermoregulation during intermittent exercise in athletes with a spinal cord injury. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2014;10:469–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Griggs KE, Havenith G, Price MJ, Mason BS, Goosey-Tolfrey VL. Thermoregulatory responses during competitive wheelchair rugby match play. Int J Sports Med. 2017;38:177–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Byrne C, Lim CL. The ingestible telemetric body core temperature sensor: a review of validity and exercise applications. Br J Sports Med. 2007;41:126–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Lynch A, Antony A, Dobbs B, Frizelle F. Bowel dysfunction following spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2001;39:193–203.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Price MJ, Campbell IG. Effects of spinal cord lesion level upon thermoregulation during exercise in the heat. Med Sci Sport Exerc. 2003;35:1100–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Song YG, Won YH, Park SH, Ko MH, Seo JH. Changes in body temperature in incomplete spinal cord injury by digital infrared thermographic imaging. Ann Rehabil Med. 2015;39:696–704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Price MJ, Campbell IG. Thermoregulatory responses of paraplegic and able-bodied athletes at rest and during prolonged upper body exercise and passive recovery. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1997;76:552–60.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Price MJ, Campbell IG. Thermoregulatory responses of spinal cord injured and able-bodied athletes to prolonged upper body exercise and recovery. Spinal Cord. 1999;37:772–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Goosey-Tolfrey V, Swainson M, Boyd C, Atkinson G, Tolfrey K. The effectiveness of hand cooling at reducing exercise-induced hyperthermia and improving distance-race performance in wheelchair and able-bodied athletes. J Appl Physiol. 2008;105:37–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Veltmeijer MT, Pluim B, Thijssen DH, Hopman MT, Eijsvogels TM. Thermoregulatory responses in wheelchair tennis players: a pilot study. Spinal Cord. 2014;52:373–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Lorenzo S, Minson CT. Heat acclimation improves cutaneous vascular function and sweating in trained cyclists. J Appl Physiol. 2010;109:1736–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Minson CT, Brunt VE. Thermoregulatory considerations for the performance of exercise in SCI. In: Taylor J, editor. The physiology of exercise in spinal cord injury. Boston, MA, USA: Springer; 2016. p. 127–60.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Martin Ginis KA, van der Scheer JW, Latimer-Cheung AE, Barrow A, Bourne C, Carruthers P, et al. Evidence-based scientific exercise guidelines for adults with spinal cord injury: an update and a new guideline. Spinal Cord. 2018;56:308–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Claydon VE, Krassioukov AV. Orthostatic hypotension and autonomic pathways after spinal cord injury. J Neurotrauma. 2006;23:1713–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Hubli M, Krassioukov AV. How reliable are sympathetic skin responses in subjects with spinal cord injury? Clin Auton Res. 2015;25:117–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    The Consensus Committee of the American Autonomic Society and the American Academy of Neurology. Consensus statement on the definition of orthostatic hypotension, pure autonomic failure and multiple system atrophy. Neurology. 1996;46:1470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Ramanathan NL. A new weighting system for mean surface temperature of the human body. J Appl Physiol. 1964;19:531–3.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Havenith G, Inoue Y, Luttikholt V, Kenney WL. Age predicts cardiovascular, but not thermoregulatery, responses to humid heat stress. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1995;70:88–96.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Swain DP, Franklin BA. VO2 reserve and the minimal intensity for improving cardiorespiratory fitness. Med Sci Sport Exerc. 2002;34:152–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Lee SMC, Williams WJ, Schneider SM. Core temperature measurement during submaximal exercise: esophageal, rectal, and intestinal temperatures. NASA Center for AeroSpace Information Technical Report, NASA/TP 210133; 2000. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=20000036595.

  27. 27.

    Gant N, Atkinson G, Williams C. The validity and reliability of intestinal temperature during intermittent running. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2006;38:1926–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Kolka MA, Quigley MD, Blanchard LA, Toyota DA, Stephenson LA. Validation of a temperature telemetry system during moderate and strenuous exercise. J Therm Biol. 1993;18:203–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Keshavarzian A, Barnes WE, Bruninga K, Nemchausky B, Mermall H, Bushnell D. Delayed colonic transit in spinal cord‐injured patients measured by indium‐111 amberlite scintigraphy. Am J Gastroenterol. 1995;90:1295–300.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Krassioukov A, Eng JJ, Claxton G, Sakakibara BM, Shum S. Neurogenic bowel management after spinal cord injury: a systematic review of the evidence. Spinal Cord. 2010;48:718–33.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Pritchett RC, Green JM, Pritchett KL, Bishop P. Heat storage in upper and lower body during high-intensity exercise in athletes with spinal cord injuries. South Afr J Sport Med. 2011;23:9–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Simmons OL, Kressler J, Nash MS. Reference fitness values in the untrained spinal cord injury population. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014;95:2272–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Webborn N, Price MJ, Castle PC, Goosey-Tolfrey VL. Effects of two cooling strategies on thermoregulatory responses of tetraplegic athletes during repeated intermittent exercise in the heat. J Appl Physiol. 2005;98:2101–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Griggs K, Havenith G, Price M, Paulson T, Goosey-Tolfrey V. Effectiveness of pre-cooling and cooling during play on wheelchair rugby performance. Extrem Physiol Med. 2015;4:A4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the contributions to this study by Kyungsu Jung as well as the medical doctors and physiotherapists of Wakayama Medical University.

Funding

This study was supported by funding from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science through a Mitacs partnership, as well as the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (DG No. 238819-13 to MJM). Equipment was provided through the Peter Harrison Centre for Disability Sport (Loughborough University).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

JSA was responsible for designing the protocol, conducting the experiments, extracting and analyzing the data, interpreting the results, as well as drafting the final manuscript. YK was responsible for designing the protocol, conducting the experiments, extracting the data, interpreting the results, as well as providing feedback on the final manuscript. VLG-T was responsible for designing the protocol, interpreting the study findings, as well as providing feedback on the final manuscript. CAL was responsible for designing the protocol, interpreting the study findings, as well as providing feedback on the final manuscript. MJM was responsible for designing the protocol, interpreting the study findings, as well as drafting the final manuscript. YM was responsible for conducting the experiments, extracting the data, as well as providing feedback on the final manuscript. FT was responsible for designing the protocol, interpreting the study findings, as well as providing feedback on the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jason S. Au.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethics approval

All methods and procedures were approved by the Medical Ethical Committee of Wakayama Medical University (#2076), adhering to the Declaration of Helsinki except for registration in a database. All testing was completed in the Wakayama Medical University Genki Development Institute (Wakayama, Japan). All participants gave verbal and written consent prior to participation in this study. We certify that all applicable institutional and governmental regulations concerning the ethical use of human volunteers were followed during the course of the research.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Au, J.S., Kamijo, Yi., Goosey-Tolfrey, V.L. et al. Comparison between esophageal and intestinal temperature responses to upper-limb exercise in individuals with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 57, 586–593 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41393-019-0257-5

Download citation

Further reading

Search

Quick links