Abstract
Histone post-translational modifications (HPTMs), as one of the core mechanisms of epigenetic regulation, are garnering increasing attention due to their close association with the onset and progression of diseases and their potential as targeted therapeutic agents. Advances in high-throughput molecular tools and the abundance of bioinformatics data have led to the discovery of novel HPTMs which similarly affect gene expression, metabolism, and chromatin structure. Furthermore, a growing body of research has demonstrated that novel histone modifications also play crucial roles in the development and progression of various diseases, including various cancers, cardiovascular diseases, infectious diseases, psychiatric disorders, and reproductive system diseases. This review defines nine novel histone modifications: lactylation, citrullination, crotonylation, succinylation, SUMOylation, propionylation, butyrylation, 2-hydroxyisobutyrylation, and 2-hydroxybutyrylation. It comprehensively introduces the modification processes of these nine novel HPTMs, their roles in transcription, replication, DNA repair and recombination, metabolism, and chromatin structure, as well as their involvement in promoting the occurrence and development of various diseases and their clinical applications as therapeutic targets and potential biomarkers. Moreover, this review provides a detailed overview of novel HPTM inhibitors targeting various targets and their emerging strategies in the treatment of multiple diseases while offering insights into their future development prospects and challenges. Additionally, we briefly introduce novel epigenetic research techniques and their applications in the field of novel HPTM research.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Histones, as the fundamental building blocks of chromatin, have their functions and characteristics regulated through an intricate and complex array of HPTMs.1 These modifications work in concert to determine the spatial structure of chromatin and profoundly influence the expression and interpretation of genetic information.2 The diverse changes brought about by HPTMs offer an additional layer of control over gene expression, enabling cells to respond flexibly to various external stimuli. This adaptability ensures the normal functioning of vital processes while also allowing for rapid reactions to environmental changes.3,4,5 Proteins undergo various HPTMs that are crucial for chromatin regulation and function, affecting gene expression, chromatin structure, and cellular responses to stimuli. While acetylation (ac) and methylation (ma) are well-studied HPTMs, there has been a recent realization that the functions of many HPTMs remain largely unknown. Newly discovered HPTMs include a range of lysine ac such as propionylation (pr), butyrylation (bu), crotonylation (cr), hydroxyisobutyrylation (hib), succinylation (succ), and ma.6,7,8,9 Many of these ac sites coincide with known ac sites, prompting questions regarding the functional similarities between them.10 HPTMs are subject to influence by external environmental factors and metabolic status, and they possess the ability to significantly affect the initiation and progression of a range of conditions, including inflammation,11 cancers,12 cardiovascular diseases,13 kidney diseases,14 metabolic disorders15 and neuropsychiatric diseases.16
HPTMs serve as a pivotal link between cellular metabolism and the control of epigenetic mechanisms, emerging as a focal point of study within this domain.17 In the realm of cancer treatment, notably, inhibitors that target HPTMs, including ma and ac, have shown efficacy. For example, demethylating agents and histone deacetylase inhibitors can effectively treat acute myeloid leukemia and T-cell lymphoma.18 Furthermore, targeting epigenetic regulatory factors represents an effective strategy for reversing drug resistance.19 These advantages have prompted researchers to shift their focus towards the emerging field of HPTMs studies in recent years. With breakthroughs in proteomics research using high-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS), research has identified nine novel HPTMs,20 including lactylation (la),21 citrullination (cit), cr,22 succ,9 pr,6 bu,6 SUMOylation, hib8 and 2-hydroxybutyrylation (bhb).23 Recent studies have elucidated the novel mechanistic roles, associations with cancers, and potential therapeutic applications of these HPTMs, revealing substantial practical implications.
The developmental trajectory of Hptms
The concept of epigenetics, initially introduced by Conrad Hal Waddington in the year 1942 as a mechanism elucidating how the genotype begets the phenotype, has experienced substantial development. From Waddington’s designation of epigenetics as the process through which the genotype engenders the phenotype,24 to Nanney’s 25focus on the regulatory systems governing gene expression, and further to Riggs,26 Holliday,27,28 Martienssen, and Russo emphasizing heritable gene function changes that cannot be explained by alterations in the DNA sequence. Bird 29construed epigenetics as the adaptive alterations of chromosomal structures, while Greally and Lappalainen posited that it involves gene regulators that endow cells with the capacity to memorialize past events. Lastly, Nicoglou highlighted the stability exerted by intracellular factors on the potentialities of the genome. These definitions collectively mirror the richness and complexity inherent in the domain of epigenetics.30 Waddington’s concept of the “epigenetic landscape,” introduced in 1957, emphasizes that cellular differentiation could be regulated by alterations in the epigenetic landscape rather than by changes in the genes themselves.24,31,32 Subsequent advancements in epigenetics have resulted in breakthroughs across various aspects: In 1964, the first description of histone modifications closely linked to the regulation of RNA synthesis;33 the chromatin nucleosome organization model proposed in 1974, which detailed the basic unit of chromatin;34 the discovery of DNA modifications in 1975, particularly 5-methylcytosine, demonstrating its relevance to gene regulation;28 and in 1976, Sanger’s identification of circular RNA, along with the first long non-coding RNA (H19) recognized in 1990, blazed new trails for epigenetic regulatory research.35,36 In the year 1994, the unveiling of the initial microRNA, lin-4, illuminated the process through which miRNAs orchestrate the regulation of gene expression. This is achieved by their complementary association with specific target mRNAs.36 Additionally, the initial discovery in 1996 of histone acetyltransferases (HATs) and histone deacetylases (HDACs) provided insights into the role of protein acetylation in epigenetics.37,38 The year 1997 marked a significant advancement in the realm of molecular biology, with X-ray crystallography elucidating the nucleosome core particle’s structure within chromatin. This revelation provided a profound insight into the organizational framework of DNA and the intricacies of its regulatory systems.39 Since the turn of the millennium, the field of epigenetics has continued to evolve rapidly. The discovery of SUV39H1 marked the beginning of histone lysine methyltransferase research, with the first histone lysine demethylase LSD1 following closely behind in 2004.32,40 In 2006, the FDA approved the first batch of epigenetic drugs for cancer treatment, and in 2012, the first reports of cancer-related histone gene mutations emerged.41,42 In 2015, the NIH Roadmap Epigenomics Mapping Consortium released 111 reference human epigenomes.43 Over the past five years, a multitude of epigenetic drugs targeting DNA methyltransferases, HDACs, HMTs, and BET proteins have been tested in clinical trials, investigating their efficacy in treating various diseases, both as monotherapies and in combination therapies.30 These achievements reflect the multifaceted nature of epigenetics as a concept across different disciplinary contexts, revealing the historical evolution and rich definitions within this field.
Before the early 1990s, it was widely held that histones—compact basic proteins that, in conjunction with DNA, constitute the chromatin framework in the nucleus—simply functioned as structural support for DNA, playing no active role in the regulation of genes.44 However, subsequent research has shown that histones play crucial roles in gene expression regulation, DNA damage repair, DNA replication, and recombination. Histones are pivotal mediators in the epigenetic regulatory landscape, influencing inheritable chromatin configurations that transcend the genetic script of DNA. Such a role is indispensable for cellular differentiation, where histones undergo an array of covalent modifications. These alterations span phosphorylation, ubiquitination, acetylation, methylation, along with emergent types of histone modifications such as la, cit, cr, succ, pr, bu, SUMOylation, hib, and bhb. The histone code hypothesis posits that these modifications, occurring singly or in concert on one or several histone tails, operate in a sequential or combinatorial manner, creating a ‘histone code’. This code is interpreted by specific proteins, which then initiate diverse downstream biological outcomes. The resulting histone codes may manifest as transient signals or as more enduring entities, with the latter embodying the true heritable epigenetic code.45
Histone modifications, as an integral component of epigenetics, were first described in 1964 when histone ac was discovered, playing a crucial role in local chromatin relaxation. This process of ac, by neutralizing the positive charges on lysine residues, diminishes the interaction strength between histones and DNA.46 However, it was not until between 1996 and 1998 that, with the development of molecular cloning techniques and protein purification methods, scientists successfully identified and characterized eight different HATs containing acetyltransferase domains. This significant advancement not only enriched our understanding of the regulatory functions of histones but also unveiled the pivotal role of ac in gene expression. Regarding histone ma, its functional role was recognized as early as 1962, but a deeper investigation into its mechanisms became possible only with the identification of HMTs. These HMTs catalyze the ma of histones at specific residues, thereby regulating gene expression and chromatin structure. From 1993 to 2005, scientists gradually identified a range of HMTs responsible for various ma reactions, broadening our comprehension of the complexity and precision of histone functions. As we ventured into the new millennium, a succession of pivotal discoveries concerning novel histone modifications has been made. These have not only enriched our comprehension of cellular biology but have also unveiled new vistas for therapeutic intervention. To begin with, in 2003, Shiio and Eisenman conducted pioneering research on the SUMOylation of histone H4 at lysine 12, marking the commencement of explorations into the mechanisms of histone modification.47 Subsequently, in 2007, Chen and colleagues discovered the ubiquitination and proline isomerization modifications of histones, further enriching our understanding of the diversity of histone functions. By 2011, scientists had for the first time identified the succ of histones in mammals, offering a fresh perspective on the regulation of histone modifications.48 However, in 2014, Dai’s team, utilizing advanced mass spectrometry techniques and chemical biology methods, identified a novel histone modification known as bu, thereby pioneering a new field in histone modification research.6 Subsequently, in 2016, Xie and colleagues identified bhb as a HPTM, further expanding our understanding of the diversity of histone modifications.23 By 2017, Tan and others, through a systematic analysis, discovered a new HPTM, cr, highlighting the importance of specific histone modifications in the regulation of gene expression.7 Finally, in 2019, a study revealed that an accumulation of lactate could trigger histone la, affecting gene transcription and thereby elucidating the critical role of HPTMs in diseases such as cancer and inflammation.21 Fundamentally, this continuum of discoveries underscores the cumulative and forward-moving nature of scientific inquiry. Each stride is scaffolded upon pre-existing knowledge, methodically disclosing the intricate and consequential role played by histone modifications in the orchestration of gene expression and cellular operations. These studies not only provide new theoretical perspectives in biology but also pave the way for future biomedical research (Fig. 1).
Hptms: epigenetics’ key components
Structure of histones
Epigenetic regulation primarily occurs through four key mechanisms: ma of DNA, modifications of histone post-translationally (often referred to as HPTMs), modulation of the chromatin architecture, and the regulation by noncoding RNAs.49,50 Histones, essential components of epigenetic machinations, fulfill two critical nuclear roles: DNA compaction and gene expression regulation. These small, basic proteins are characterized by a globular domain at the C-terminus and a tail at the N-terminus. Within the eukaryotic cell nucleus, they associate with DNA, constructing nucleosomes—the fundamental building blocks of chromatin. Approximately 146 base pairs of DNA coil around a core histone octamer, comprised of two each of histones H2A and H2B, and a tetramer of histones H3 and H4. Additionally, the linker histone H1 fortifies chromatin structure by anchoring both to the nucleosome and the inter-nucleosomal DNA.51 Histones are adorned with a variety of HPTMs, primarily occurring on their N-terminal tails.52 Histone tails, characterized by their inherent disordered structure and extensive post-translational modifications, are central to transcriptional regulation.53 These modifications, which include both activation through positive regulation and suppression via negative mechanisms, endow histones with a dynamic regulatory capacity. Predominantly positively charged due to rich lysine and arginine residues, with about two-thirds of these charges located in the tails, histones modulate interactions with DNA and among themselves, thereby intricately influencing gene activation and repression. In essence, the modifications of histone tails are crucial for the nuanced balance of gene expression control.54
In the preceding decade and a half, scientific exploration has evolved markedly. Where initial inquiries were once centered on the HPTMs of histone tails, contemporary studies have shed light on the functional consequences of modifications occurring within the globular domains of histones. The lateral surfaces of the histone octamer, in direct contact with DNA, pose greater challenges in terms of accessibility compared to the more exposed histone tails. Despite this, nucleosomes are dynamic structures; their DNA intermittently unwinds from and rebinds to the lateral surface, consequently providing chromatin-modifying enzymes the opportunity to access and alter these nucleosomal regions.55 Numerous HPTMs discerned within the globular domain appear to be situated on the lateral surface or at the junctures between the histones forming the octamer. This observation intimates that alongside the extensively researched histone tail modifications, those within the globular domains are equally integral to the dynamic behavior of nucleosomes. These modifications influence the interactions between DNA and histones, as well as the overall structure and function of chromatin, exemplified by modifications on the lateral surface of the histone octamer,56 HPTMs surrounding the symmetry axis,57 and modifications at the octamer interfaces.58
Furthermore, the codex of histone modifications is characterized by its dynamism and complexity.50 For instance, histones can undergo a multitude of modifications on different amino acid residues. Mass spectrometry has unveiled intricate patterns of modifications on histones H2A, H2B, H3, and H4, identifying them as having 13, 12, 21, and 14 potential modification sites, respectively.59 These modifications encompass ma, ac, phosphorylation, and ubiquitination, among others. Each site may undergo modification or remain unmodified, thereby amplifying the potentialities and intricacies of these modifications. Notably, lysine residues can not only be methylated or acetylated but, in the case of ma, can exhibit variability with mono-, di-, or trime. Given these combinations and variations, the overall pattern of histone modifications displays a tremendous diversity, constituting a complex regulatory network. Additionally, the code of histone modifications can sometimes change transiently with the cellular milieu, reflecting shifts in the cell’s physiological state and surrounding signals.29 Furthermore, research has unveiled that specific “active” histone modification patterns, including H3K4ma2/ma3, H3K79ma2, and ac of H3 and H4, exhibit temporal stability in the promoter regions of genes, persisting even in cells halted in mitosis. This suggests the potential inheritability of such modification patterns.60,61 The concept of an inheritable histone code is embraced as an epigenetic code, denoting the transmission of this code from cell to cell across disparate tissues within multicellular entities. Consequently, this influences the expression tableau across the organism’s entirety.45
Enzymes in Hptms
HPTMs are of paramount importance in epigenetic discourse, as they modulate chromatin architecture and gene activity by appending chemical groups to amino acid residues on histone tails. The dynamism of these modifications involves a variety of specialized enzymes, primarily categorized into three groups: “readers,” “writers,” and “erasers“.62 “Reader” enzymes recognize and bind to specific chemical modifications, such as ma or ac, on histones, thereby recruiting other proteins or protein complexes to the chromatin and subsequently influencing gene activity. This recognition mechanism is facilitated through specialized domains, enabling precise regulation of transcriptional activity by the “reader” enzymes. “Writer” enzymes are responsible for adding new chemical modifications, such as methyl, acetyl, or phosphate groups, to histones. Enzymes like SETD2, KDM5B, and EP300 play key roles in cellular function and development by catalyzing specific lysine or serine residues and regulating gene expression through these modifications. In contrast, “eraser” enzymes are tasked with removing existing histone modifications. “Erasers” such as demethylases and deacetylases, like HDAC3, affect gene expression and modulate cellular functions by removing modifications, like acetyl groups, from histones.63,64The activity of these enzymes is crucial for maintaining the dynamic state of the chromatin and for adaptive modulation of gene expression patterns.49
Within the realm of epigenetic regulation, HPTMs involve a myriad of specific enzymes tasked with catalyzing, recognizing, or removing modifications. P300/CBP, as a ubiquitously present acyltransferase, readily facilitates the production of histone pr and bu.65,66 The GCN5 and MYST families are specifically dedicated to the targeted inscription of pr.67 Within the context of histone ma and succ, the corresponding malonyl-CoA and succinyl-CoA regulate the levels of these modifications under the catalytic influence of acyltransferases. SIRT5 possesses the capacity for demalonylation, while SIRT2 demonstrates similar functionality in yeast.68 In the context of bhb, the enzyme P300 adeptly appends β-hydroxybutyryl moieties, whereas SIRT3 is adept at reversing this biochemical process.69 Additionally, class I and III HDACs harbor the capacity to excise β-hydroxybutyrate moieties. The regulation of histone glutarylation is managed by GCN5 and SIRT7, with glutaryl-CoA being a determinant in the modulation of glutarylation’s prevalence and localization.58 Furthermore, the recognition and catalysis of cr involve the YEATS and DPF domains, as well as CDYL reader structures, with P300 considered to be the sole known octanoyltransferase.70 In conclusion, the deacylation of crotonylated histone peptides and proteins is predominantly executed by members of the SIRT family, including SIRT1, SIRT2, and SIRT3. Conversely, the overexpression of HDACs can diminish the concentration of cr marks.71,72 The activity of these enzymes is integral to the nuanced regulation of gene expression and profoundly influences cellular metabolism and development, occupying a central position in the context of cellular physiology and pathology.
The role of dysregulated novel HPTMs in disease pathophysiology
Histone lactylation
Lactate is a common byproduct of glycolysis, predominantly converted from pyruvate through the action of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH).73 Despite traditionally being considered a metabolic waste product, lactate exhibits anomalous glycolytic behavior in tumor cells, characterized by overproduction even in the presence of ample oxygen—a phenomenon first identified by Otto Warburg, known as the “Warburg effect“.74 In recent years, lactate’s role in regulating various intracellular and extracellular dynamic processes has been increasingly recognized, encompassing gene expression, metabolic dynamics, the tumor microenvironment (TME), as well as the activation or inhibition of immune cells.75,76
Zhang and colleagues’ research has uncovered histone lysine la as a novel epigenetic modification, which directly originates from exogenous or endogenous lactate.21 By employing carbon-13 labeled lactate and glucose, combined with mass spectrometry analysis, the study confirmed that lactate can be converted into lactyl groups on histones. This discovery not only validates the existence of histone la but also provides a new perspective on the intracellular functions of lactate. Further investigation revealed that the dynamics of la and ac differ, with these modifications being regulated differently by glucose metabolism.77 The research team also explored the relationship between lactate production and the levels of histone la, finding that glycolytic inhibitors, which reduce lactate generation, decrease the levels of histone la, whereas mitochondrial inhibitors or hypoxic conditions that increase lactate production led to an increase in histone la. Moreover, the study highlighted that various histone lysine ac, such as bu, pr, and hib, are associated with changes in the rate of glycolysis.7,69 Recent studies indicate that controlling the concentration of acetyl coenzyme A (the substrate for acetyltransferases) can effectively regulate the levels of histone ac.78 Overall, the research conducted by Zhang and colleagues illuminates the significant role of histone la in cellular metabolism and epigenetic regulation, particularly under hypoxic conditions, where an increase in lactate independently of the acetyl coenzyme A regulatory pathway directly influences the elevation of histone la levels. These findings pave the way for future research into how lactate can affect cellular functions through epigenetic mechanisms.
Lactate is a known energy source for cancer cells, which shuttle lactate to adjacent cancer cells, the surrounding stroma, and vascular endothelial cells, thereby inducing metabolic reprogramming.79 Lactate not only contributes to the promotion of tumor-associated inflammation but also serves as a signaling molecule that can stimulate angiogenesis within the tumor milieu. However, the non-metabolic effects of lactate at high concentrations remain unclear.80 In 2019, studies showed lactate accumulation triggers histone la, influencing gene transcription, and suggesting its significant role in conditions like cancer and inflammation.21 Additionally, many HPTMs are not enzymatically regulated but are merely chemical by-products. Additionally, metabolic intermediates serve not only as sources of chemical substances but also regulate gene expression by influencing HPTMs. Evidence of “writers” and “erasers” confirms that their regulation is at least partially enzyme-mediated, thereby making HPTMs both targetable and directly exploitable.81,82 Recent research connects histone la to cancer progression, emphasizing lysine la’s importance in altering cancer cell metabolism.83 Disruption of histone la unbalances gene transcription, leading to cancer and various diseases. Recent research connects histone la to cancer progression, emphasizing lysine la’s importance in altering cancer cell metabolism.83 Disruption of histone la unbalances gene transcription, leading to cancer and various diseases. Moreover, existing studies indicate a strong link between histone la and cancer prognosis.
Histone citrullination
Histone citrullination is a HPTM catalyzed by the peptidylarginine deiminase (PAD) family, a process contingent upon elevated calcium concentrations. Under pathological conditions, PAD enzymes have the ability to citrullinate various structural proteins.84 Studies suggest that histone cit is implicated in autoimmune conditions, exemplified by rheumatoid arthritis (RA), wherein the presence of anti-citrullinated protein antibodies is a distinct marker for the disease. They can be utilized for early detection, reflect disease outcomes, and serve as valuable diagnostic and prognostic tools for RA.85,86 Considering the involvement of PADs in both normal physiological functions and disease processes, research and application of PAD inhibitors have been pursued. Numerous PAD inhibitors are utilized for the treatment of PAD-associated diseases in the skin, joints, colon, and immune system.87,88,89,90
PADs are regarded as transcription-regulating proteins that influence gene expression, the precise biological functions of citrullination remain unclear.91 Citrullinated histones account for about 10% of all histone molecules in HL-60 granulocytes, underscoring the significance of this HPTMs in numerous nucleus-associated processes.92 Cit plays a vital role in embryonic development; studies have demonstrated that the use of a specific PAD1 inhibitor significantly reduces cit of H4R3 and H3R2/8/17 in embryonic cells, coinciding with a developmental arrest at the four-cell stage.93 Moreover, in a zebrafish tissue injury model, PAD2-mediated H4 cit is essential for effective regeneration, posited as a potential intermediary between early calcium signaling and subsequent wound healing.94 The linker histone H1.0, when citrullinated, accumulates in aging cells and is involved in heterochromatinization and the aging process.95 PAD2 modulates the expression of genes related to lactation through histone cit.96,97 Another function of citrullinated histones is to modulate the formation of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs).98,99 In innate immunity, neutrophils are the first responders to bacterial infection, combating various pathogens by forming so-called NETs.98 The enzyme PAD4-mediated cit of histones plays a pivotal role in the genesis of NETs. Neutrophils deficient in PAD4 fail to produce NETs upon exposure to chemotactic stimuli or bacterial incubation, highlighting the essentiality of PAD4 in the NET-dependent antibacterial response.100 Research has also discovered that inhibiting PAD2 can reduce the formation of NETs and the production of inflammatory cytokines in sepsis, suggesting that PAD2 may play an important role in regulating both NET formation and inflammatory responses.101 In cases of COVID-19, an increase in the quantity of NET remnants has been observed in patients’ serum, indicating that healthy neutrophils, upon exposure to serum samples from COVID-19 patients, undergo NETosis more frequently.102 Histone cit contributes significantly to embryonic development, reproductive functions, chromatin expression, dissolution, pluripotency, and the formation of NETs.
Histone cit by PAD enzymes is intricately linked to cancer progression, impacting tumor development, gene regulation, cell differentiation and cell death, and plays a key role in chromatin activity modulation. PAD inhibitors have demonstrated immense potential in the field of cancer therapy, with PAD4 inhibitors in particular being applied to prevent tumor metastasis and associated thrombosis in cancer patients.103 Histone cit by PAD is increasingly recognized as a diagnostic marker and treatment target in cancer research. Investigations have revealed that in a spectrum of malignancies—among them non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), gastric cancer, hepatitis B virus-associated hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and various malignant hematological disorders—PAD-mediated cit of histones is notably elevated.104
NETs are observed in a variety of human cancer types, recognized as contributors to cancer progression.105,106 PAD4, an enzyme abundantly found in various cancers and neutrophils, plays a critical role in the formation of NETs.95 Additionally, the development of NETs driven by histone cit is closely associated with tumor proliferation and spread, involving processes such as ECM reorganization, surgical stress response, hypoxic conditions, alterations in fatty acids and cellular interactions through physical binding.104 Corroborating this perspective, Demers et al. utilized PAD4-deficient mice, which intrinsically exhibit impaired neutrophil chromatin decondensation and diminished NETs generation capabilities. Their findings insinuated that when neutrophils initiate NETosis, it inadvertently promotes tumor proliferation. Thus, the study suggested that tumors, or the environment they exist in, trigger neutrophils to undergo NETosis, leading to a build-up of NETs within the tumor itself, which in turn promotes tumor proliferation.107 In summary, histone cit contributes to cancer progression and dissemination through NET production.
Histone crotonylation
Histone cr was first identified by Tan and colleagues through the analysis of MS data. Utilizing the PTMap software to pinpoint post-translational modification sites, they uncovered 28 potential butyrylated histone markers.7,108 Tan and colleagues have discovered that novel histone modifications mark TSS of active genes with specificity for cr, predominantly located at active promoters, which are critical to the regulation of gene expression. This finding underscores the significant role of histone cr in modulating chromatin structure and function.7,109 Histone cr, much like ac, invariably takes place on lysine residues and is dynamically governed by the enzymatic actions of crotonyltransferases and decrotonylases.110 Cr is differentiated from ac within the histone modification landscape by its distinct structural features, including a four-carbon planar chain and an alkenyl C = C double bond, which confer upon it unique functional properties.70 In the mechanistic dance of cr, crotonyltransferases orchestrate the donation of crotonyl groups from crotonyl-CoA to specific amino acid residues on histones, while decrotonylases play their part in excising these crotonyl moieties, ensuring a dynamic equilibrium. HATs also play a regulatory role in the cr of histones, while a class of HDAC1, 2, 3, 8 operate as decrotonylases. Furthermore, studies have found that the concentration of crotonyl-CoA is a limiting factor in histone cr.111,112 Cr is a highly dynamic modification, capable of either activating or repressing transcription. Cr exerts a more significant impact on the regulation of cell cycle and metabolism compared to ac, with its influence being dependent on particular genes or environmental conditions. In both human somatic cells and mouse male germ cells, cr is observed at the promoter regions of actively transcribed genes or at enhancers, where it plays a pivotal role in the modulation of gene transcription.7,111 Histone cr is a critical element in orchestrating a multitude of biological pathways, including the response to acute renal damage, the maturation of sperm cells, the preservation of chromosomal end structures, the dormancy of the human immunodeficiency virus, and the advancement of oncological diseases.14,113,114,115,116,117
Histone succinylation
The phenomenon of histone succ first emerged in scientific literature with its identification in mammals in 2011.48 Histone succ was first identified in the activity of homoserine succinyltransferase and subsequently confirmed as a natural and novel post-translational modification through methods such as Western blot analysis, isotopic labeling, tandem MS/MS, and co-elution experiments using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC).118,119 This entity has been detected across diverse biological systems, ranging from the bacterium Escherichia coli, unicellular yeast organisms, the protozoan Toxoplasma gondii, to the cultured human cervical cancer cells known as HeLa, and extending to the hepatic tissues of mice.9,120 Discoveries across various cell types indicate a high degree of evolutionary conservation among species. Many of the identified succ sites overlap with sites of other HPTMs, such as ac, ma, and hib, suggesting intricate interactions between histone modifications. The identification of lysine succ has also led to the discovery of other similar modifications, such as pr and bu.121 Succ can exert a direct influence on the organization of chromatin by chemically altering histones or by modulating interactions within the nucleus. This process can induce spatial conformational changes within the chromatin structure that are more substantial than those caused by ma or ac.9,69 The presence of succinyl groups on lysine residues can attenuate the interaction between DNA and histones, thereby destabilizing nucleosomes and chromosomal integrity. This weakening of associations permits DNA to disengage more readily from its protein constraints, enhancing the accessibility of transcription factors to DNA sequences. The consequence is an upregulation in the transcriptional activity of genes.122
Numerous studies support the notion that enzymes can catalyze the succ of histones. For instance, p300 can induce succ on synthetic histone tail peptides in vitro.121,123,124 Atsushi Yokoyama and colleagues have provided compelling evidence that the succ of nuclear histones is an enzymatically driven process.125 Moreover, studies spearheaded by Wang et al. have illuminated that the enzyme lysine acetyltransferase 2 A (KAT2A), also recognized as GCN5, possesses a preferential binding affinity for succinyl-CoA over acetyl-CoA.126 The α-ketoglutarate dehydrogenase complex, comprising three constituent components, facilitates the production of succinyl-CoA within the nucleus, thus supplying the required substrate for KAT2A to catalyze histone succ. Contrastingly, a segment of research posits that enzymatic action might not be pivotal in the succ of histones. Research by Simithy et al. has found that the succ of histones H3 and H4 is primarily mediated by non-enzymatic actions under conditions involving a variety of HATs and non-enzymatic circumstances.127,128 Elevating the concentration of succinyl-CoA can increase the abundance of nuclear succ. Acidic acyl modifications, including ma, succ, and glutarylation, are more amenable to non-enzymatic catalysis in the absence of enzymes.
Histone succ orchestrated by KAT2A might be a key player in disease pathogenesis, as seen in the emergence of human pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and in the context of Hepatitis B virus infection. KAT2A’s significant influence on gene regulation and cell proliferation is exemplified by the observation that, within PDAC samples, the succ at histone H3 lysine 79 augments the levels of 14-3-3ζ and β-catenin. This modification is correlated with the modulation of cellular glycolytic pathways and the enhancement of cellular migration and invasiveness.129 Research shows histone succ affects various biological processes, including protease function and gene control, influencing diseases like cancer, cardiac, hepatic disorders and neurodegeneration.130 Recent studies increasingly show histone succ’s key role in tumor growth and progression, suggesting new paths for cancer treatment.
Histone SUMOylation
Histone SUMOylation, the bonding of SUMO proteins to histones discovered by Shiio and Eisenman in 2003. They investigated the SUMOylation of histone H4 at lysine 12 and discussed the potential role of this modification in gene repression.47
Although histone ma, ac, and ubiquitination have been extensively studied, research into histone SUMOylation has been challenging due to its extremely low abundance in cells and the lack of specific antibodies.47,131 Histone SUMOylation occurs across a variety of organisms, including yeast, protozoa, and plants, and is involved in the regulation of transcription, centromere assembly, chromatin structure modulation, and double-strand break repair, among other functions. A specific lysine residue, K12, in histone H4 emerges as a major recurrent site of SUMOylation, which is typically associated with the suppression of gene transcription. Biophysical studies have suggested that H4K12succ is incompatible with the compact chromatin structures linked to transcriptional silencing. Further biochemical investigations have revealed that H4K12succ enhances the activity of the specific histone demethylase LSD1 within nucleosomes for H3K4ma2.132 Evidence has shown that H4K12succ directly inhibits transcription mediated by RNA Polymerase II on chromatin templates and engages in direct negative crosstalk with p300-mediated histone ac and Set1/COMPASS-mediated histone ma, modifications typically associated with active gene transcription.133
Histone propionylation and histone butyrylation
In 2007, Chen et al. were the first to discover bu and pr of histones.6 These HPTMs display a considerable level of evolutionary conservation across eukaryotic species, as evidenced by their presence in yeast cells, murine hepatic tissue, and the U937 human leukemia cell line.65,134,135 Propionyl-CoA and butyryl-CoA act as substrates, donating the propionyl and butyryl moieties respectively, which are indispensable for the ac reactions leading to protein pr and bu.69 Histone lysine pr and bu are chemically similar to ac, with the addition of extra carbon atoms, suggesting that they may serve as analogs to ma.6,136 These HPTMs are proposed to be catalyzed in vitro by HATs, although evidence of their occurrence in vivo remains unclear.137 The activity of enzymes that modify histones, such as HATs, is regulated by the concentration of intracellular metabolites, such as acetyl coenzyme A, which act as cofactors for the enzymes, thereby linking the chromatin state to cellular metabolism.138,139 Propionyl CoA and butyryl CoA, related to acylation, serve as intermediates in fatty acid and amino acid metabolism. Studies identifying and mapping H3K14pr in vivo indicate its enrichment at active TSS and promoters within the mouse liver, correlating it with transcriptional activity across various metabolic states.135 While H3K14pr attracts specific binding partners, the role of H3K14bu remains less understood. It may prevent the recruitment of certain complexes, or possibly attract other binding proteins not identified in this study. Fluctuations in global H3K14pr levels suggest that histone pr plays a role in metabolic signaling and could be implicated in metabolic diseases, although the specific genomic changes warrant further investigation.140 Researchers suggest a possible association of histone bu and pr with conditions such as systemic lupus erythematosus, alcohol dependency, virus-induced cancer development and aberrant gene expression in oncological diseases.141
Researchers have identified specific form of histone bu termed lysine isobutyrylation. Notably, this isobutyrylation stems from the catabolism of valine and the oxidation of branched-chain fatty acids, pointing to its extensive regulatory roles in epigenetics and cellular physiology.142 Currently, the link between histone isobutyrylation and tumors is still unclear, with future research expected to explore this further.
Histone 2-hydroxyisobutyrylation
The Dai team identified a novel HPTMs, hib, through MS and then verified it through chemical and biochemical methods. The modification in question has been validated at 63 lysine hib sites within both human and murine histones. Investigations have determined that the histone hib mark is highly preserved across species and extensively dispersed, possesses elevated stoichiometry, and prompts notable alterations in structural configuration. These discoveries underscore the fundamental role of the histone hib mark in the governance of chromatin functionality.8
Lysine hib, ac, and cr are positioned on separate residues within histones, each exhibiting distinct functional attributes divergent from those of lysine ac.7 Research has pinpointed 63 instances of histone hib marks, a number that eclipses the identified histone lysine ac sites. Unlike the predominantly N-terminal tail localization of known cr and ac modifications, hib marks are discernible within both the N-terminal regions and the core globular domains of histones. Structurally, hib modifications diverge notably from lysine modifications such as ma, ac, or bu. Hib modifications do more than merely neutralize the positive charge of lysine; they also significantly expand its radius, indicating profound structural and functional implications.8 Essentially, the hib modification is characterized by the addition of a hydroxyl group to the lysine residue. This confers upon the modified lysine the capacity to engage in hydrogen bonding with other molecular entities. Such a characteristic is of noteworthy importance, as it can substantially influence the modulation of protein functionality.143 The genesis of hib is postulated to occur through an enzymatic process that utilizes a high-energy donor molecule, possibly sourced from 2-hydroxyisobutyrate, such as HibCoA, as a cofactor. This suggests a profound interconnection between cellular metabolism and epigenetic frameworks. Consequently, the hib pathway might provide a means for cells to adapt their epigenetic landscapes in accordance to fluctuations in the cellular concentration of HibCoA. The extent to which enzymes known to regulate lysine ac are involved in modulating hib remains an area of uncertainty. Initial in vitro assessments indicate that HDACs 1-3 have the potential to detach the 2-hydroxyisobutyryl moiety from its lysine counterpart under controlled experimental conditions; however, the validity of this activity within a cellular context awaits further verification. As a novel regulatory factor in genetic regulation, hib is closely associated with the metabolic state of the cell and plays a role in epigenetic regulation.138,144 This paves the way for future research into the biological functions and regulatory mechanisms of hib.
Histone 2-hydroxybutyrylation
Initially delineated by Xie and colleagues in the year 2016, the histone modification termed bhb is dynamically modulated by the intracellular concentration of β-hydroxybutyrate. Despite this established correlation, the exact biochemical pathway through which β-hydroxybutyrate donates β-hydroxybutyryl groups to histones has yet to be fully expounded.23,145 Investigations employing RNA sequencing techniques in conjunction with analyses utilizing the KEGG have demonstrated a robust correlation between the bhb of H3K9 and the upregulation of gene expression. When the concentration of β-hydroxybutyrate is elevated, bhb is highly expressed on histones. As an energy source during fasting states for the heart and brain, and in ketogenic diets, β-hydroxybutyrate plays a critical role. β-hydroxybutyryl-CoA, acting as a specific cofactor, catalyzes the formation of bhb in a concentration-dependent manner.69 bhb is predominantly enriched at the promoters of active genes and is associated with genes that are upregulated in metabolic pathways responsive to starvation.23 β-Hydroxybutyrate, a naturally occurring ketone body, is pivotal in the initiation and advancement of neurological disorders, underscoring its significant impact on neurobiological health. Through comprehensive research, scientists have discovered that the biological process of bhb can provide neuroprotection, effectively mitigating the toxic damage faced by neurons. Furthermore, this process also helps in preventing the degenerative changes in dopaminergic neurons among patients with AD and PD.146,147 And p53, recognized as a pivotal tumor suppressor, undergoes modification through bhb at lysines 120, 319 and 370. Under conditions of starvation, researchers noted an elevation in β-hydroxybutyrate serum concentrations in mice, accompanied by a rise in p53 bhb. This process hampers the ac of p53, leading to the cessation of cellular proliferation and a reduction in programmed cell death.148 This suggests to us the role of bhb in ketone metabolism and tumor management (Fig. 2) (Table 1).
Biological functions Of Hptms
HPTMs and genome function
HPTMs in transcription
During transcription, HPTMs of histones play a crucial role. These modifications often occur at specific genomic locations, notably enriching at genes, where their presence is associated with transcriptional activity, either positive or negative.149 HPTMs is frequently linked to transcriptional engagement, being enriched at active promoters, enhancers, and other regions of chromatin that are readily accessible. Furthermore, it has been demonstrated that HPTMs directly augments the rate of transcription within in vitro settings.150,151 Additionally, histone lysine residues are subject to modifications by various long-chain acyl groups. However, these types of modifications are generally observed with much lower prevalence compared to ac.152 A quintessential example is histone crotonylation,7 which was initially identified as a positive regulator of transcription.153 It is of particular interest to note that cr, while typically implicated in gene activation, has also been associated with the repression of gene expression within yeast organisms.154 Early studies indicated that the global levels of HPTMs are not related to transcriptional activity.155,156 The consequence of HPTMs is highly contingent upon the specific site of occurrence and it is not likely to exert a direct influence on nucleosome architecture.149 Although numerous HPTMs have been identified in association with transcription, direct evidence supporting their causal role in transcriptional regulation remains elusive.157 Herein, we contemplate the role of specific HPTMs in the regulation of transcription, with particular emphasis on the position of the modified amino acids within the histones.
An array of specific modifications occurs at the histone tails, such as the H3K4ma3, which is concentrated near TSSs and aids in the recruitment of transcriptional machinery. This includes the transcription initiation factor TFIID subunit 4, which facilitates the expression of particular genes and is associated with the maintenance of transcriptional activity in a quiescent state in mammals.158,159 Moreover, experiments in fruit flies and African clawed frogs have demonstrated that H3K4ma1 is essential for the memory of an active transcriptional state.160,161,162 Particularly in the context of novel HPTMs, researchers have employed cell-free assays to demonstrate that histone la, akin to acetylation, can directly stimulate gene transcription. Experiments using l-lactyl-coenzyme A instead of acetyl-coenzyme A demonstrated p53-dependent, p300-mediated la of H3 and H4 and the corresponding transcriptional effects. The direct mediation of transcription by histone la was confirmed using recombinant chromatin with lysine-to-arginine mutated core histones. Histone la is not essential for the induction or repression of pro-inflammatory genes but is employed to initiate the expression of homeostatic genes traditionally associated with M2-like macrophages. The aerobic glycolytic switch that occurs during M1 polarization triggers a “lactate timer” that induces M2-like characteristics at a later stage through epigenetic mechanisms, potentially aiding in repairing collateral damage suffered by the host during infection.21 Furthermore, the distribution of the epigenetic mark H3K9bhb on histone H3 correlates with alterations in gene expression, capable of reshaping the chromatin landscape and transcriptional responses in brain cells. Histone cr plays a dual regulatory role in gene expression, acting as both a transcriptional activator and repressor, depending on its location and associated genes. Sirt3 was found to reduce the expression levels of Ptk2, Tshz3, and Wapal and decrease the enrichment of histone cr at the promoters of these target genes, indicating that histone cr may serve as a positive regulatory factor for the expression of these genes.71 For instance, one study discovered that H3K9cr peaks at pro-growth genes led to gene repression, suggesting that H3K9cr is associated with the transcriptional suppression of pro-growth genes.154
In addition to the modifications occurring on histone tails, modifications to core histones exert significant influence on gene expression. Lateral Surface HPTMs can directly affect the binding affinity between histones and DNA, as well as the rate at which DNA unwinds and rewinds.55,56 Modifications on the lateral chains of histones can modulate the accessibility of DNA within nucleosomes and promote nucleosome mobility. This particular modification accelerates the rate of local DNA unwinding and induces spontaneous local conformational changes, phenomena colloquially termed as “DNA breathing.” Consequently, this fosters an enhanced affinity for transcription factor binding in vitro experiments.163,164 HPTMs around the symmetry axis decrease the overall affinity of DNA for the histone octamer, thereby reducing nucleosome stability.57,58,124,165 These core modifications exert their effects through reader or effector proteins.
The direct impact of multiple histone tail HPTMs on nucleosome stability and chromatin architecture is limited, and they typically exert biological effects through the recruitment of binding proteins, or effectors. Conversely, HPTMs that are located within the core domain of the histone octamer are inclined to exert a more direct impact on nucleosome structure and functionality. These intrinsic alterations have the potential to impinge upon chromatin-dependent processes, and this can occur independently of the presence of specific reader proteins. These insights offer a significant perspective on the dynamic modulation of chromatin structure and its impact on the regulation of gene expression, revealing a complex and nuanced interplay between histone modifications and transcriptional regulation. Through the study of these mechanisms, we can gain a more profound understanding of the expression and regulation of information within the cell, as well as unveil potential new strategies for the treatment of diseases, particularly cancer and genetic disorders.
HPTMs in recombination
In eukaryotic organisms, meiotic recombination and V(D)J recombination are two critical DNA recombination processes that play a central role in genetic diversity and the development of the immune system. Both processes involve specific HPTMs.
Meiotic recombination frequently takes place at genomic locales known as hotspots, which are characterized by an abundance of open chromatin mark. These epigenetic adornments are intricately arranged by PRDM9—a zinc finger DNA-binding protein with testis-specific expression. PRDM9, in synergy with the lymphoid-specific helicase HELLS, constitutes a vanguard complex. This coalition functions to render the chromatin more accessible, thereby enabling the facilitation of meiotic recombination.166 Studies have revealed that H4K8la is closely associated with recombination hotspots, which involve mechanisms that process DSBs, such as SPO11, DMC1, RAD51, and RPA2. Moreover, H4K8la has also been detected at meiosis-specific cohesion sites (marked by RAD21L and REC8) flanking the recombination hotspots.167 While PRDM9 plays a significant role in delineating the landscape for meiotic recombination, its presence is not indispensable for the recombination process to occur, as evidenced in the context of rats.168 In the majority of vertebrates lacking PRDM9, recombination activity shifts toward other open chromatin structures, such as the promoters of active genes. From a topological perspective, the loop anchors of topologically associating domains (TADs) are enriched with H3K4ma3 and contain multiple PRDM9 binding sites. These features may explain why loop anchors can serve as hotspots for meiotic recombination.169,170
The process of V(D)J recombination relies on the functionality of proteins produced by the Recombination Activating Genes, which assemble into a complex consisting of RAG1 and RAG2 subunits. This complex is characterized by its recombinase activity and its ability to bind to the highly conserved recombination signal sequences that border the V, D, and J gene segments. These genomic regions associated with V(D)J recombination are marked by active histone modifications. The interaction of the plant homeodomain within RAG2 with H3K4ma3 triggers a conformational alteration in RAG1. This modification is pivotal in enhancing the catalytic efficiency necessary for recombination.171
Overall, H3K4ma3 plays a pivotal role in both types of recombination. In meiotic recombination, it interacts with PRDM9, influencing chromatin accessibility and the selection of recombination sites; in V(D)J recombination, HPTMs is directly involved in the activation and functional deployment of the RAG complex, illustrating its guiding role in immune diversity. These findings highlight the dual function of HPTMs in DNA recombination: modulating transcription and directly impacting the recombination mechanism.
HPTMs in DNA repair
HPTMs are critically involved in the cellular mechanisms addressing DNA damage response and repair, particularly when confronting double-strand breaks (DSBs), which represent the most severe form of DNA damage. Genomic integrity is continually challenged by DNA damage, which is a hallmark of cancer.172 The propagation of γH2AX coincides with the boundaries of TADs and may be facilitated by the process of loop extrusion mediated by cohesin, aiding in the spread of γH2AX from the site of the double-strand break.173,174 γH2AX provides a platform for the recruitment of DNA damage signaling factors, which initiate ubiquitination of H1 and H2A histones mediated by the ubiquitin ligases RNF8 and RNF168, triggering downstream repair processes.174,175 The functional engagement of these signaling entities is pivotal in dictating the subsequent choice of DNA repair pathways. Double-strand breaks are predominantly mended through two principal mechanisms: Homologous Recombination (HR) and Non-Homologous End Joining.176 HPTMs modulate the balance between the two repair pathways by influencing the binding and activity of 53BP1 and BRCA1. The affinity of different reader domains for cell cycle-regulated and DNA damage-dependent HPTMs collectively and distinctively determines the choice of double-strand break repair pathway. There, they act to inhibit transcription and promote the recruitment of DNA repair factors, thereby facilitating the repair process.177,178 Furthermore, research indicates that H3K9 la is significantly enriched in the LUC7L2 promoter, activating LUC7L2 transcription to enhance its expression. LUC7L2 mediates the retention of intron 7 in MLH1, thereby reducing MLH1 expression and inhibiting mismatch repair, ultimately leading to TMZ resistance in glioblastoma multiforme (0GBM).179 The orchestration of DNA repair and transcriptional processes is further regulated by the intricate interplay of HPTMs. These HPTMs reveal how chromatin states influence a cell’s capacity to respond to and efficiently repair DNA damage by affecting chromatin structure and function during the DNA damage response and repair processes. Histone modifications play a crucial role in maintaining genomic integrity and preventing the development of cancer.
HPTMs in replication
HPTMs play a pivotal role in regulating DNA replication. The modifications, particularly ac and ma on specific histone lysine residues, are essential for the setup and activation of replication origins and influence the overall chromatin structure. These alterations facilitate the assembly of necessary replication complexes, impacting the initiation and efficiency of DNA replication. Additionally, HPTMs are involved in defining the replication timing across the genome, which is crucial for maintaining genome stability and organization. The dynamic relationship between DNA replication and HPTMs suggests that changes in replication timing can alter histone modifications, thereby affecting genomic architecture and compartmentalization within the nucleus. This highlights the significance of a regulated replication process in preserving the integrity and functionality of the genome180,181,182,183,184 (Fig. 3).
HPTMs and cancer metabolism
HPTMs are intimately connected to metabolism. Through metabolic pathways, glucose is broken down into pyruvate and lactate, both of which are associated with specific histone modifications. Lactate is directly linked to histone la, while pyruvate is further converted into acetyl coenzyme A, a substrate for various acylation modifications, including bu. Fatty acids undergo β-oxidation within mitochondria, leading to the production of intermediates like Ac-CoA, which are not only pivotal for energy generation but also fundamental to histone modification processes. For instance, Ac-CoA can directly contribute to histone acetylation. Succinyl coenzyme A and hydroxybutyryl coenzyme A are two other acyl-CoA molecules, which can result in histone succ, bhb, and hib, respectively. The oxidation of long-chain fatty acids also produces various long-chain acyl-CoAs, such as propionyl coenzyme A, which is associated with histone pr. Moreover, amino acids like lysine and tryptophan can be metabolized into their corresponding acyl-CoA derivatives. These acyl-CoA molecules subsequently react with histone lysine residues, leading to modifications such as cr. These processes fundamentally represent the interplay between cellular metabolism and epigenetic modifications, reflecting how cells adjust gene expression and protein function in response to varying metabolic states.
The connection between epigenetics and metabolism is bidirectional, encompassing both research into how HPTMs control the expression of metabolic genes, and investigations into how metabolic pathways influence these newly discovered HPTMs. This bidirectional interaction reveals the complex interplay between epigenetics and metabolic processes, enhancing our understanding of the regulatory mechanisms within organisms. Recent studies reveal that histone modifications, including la, cr, and succ, are intricately linked to cancer metabolism. For instance, histone la bridges cellular metabolism and gene expression, potentially revealing its disease mechanisms. A recent study conducted an analysis of differentially lactylated proteins across various groups, revealing their involvement in a wide range of biological functions. These functions include amino acid and lipoprotein metabolism, as well as the synthesis of ribosomal proteins. This analysis confirmed the close association between histone la and HCC. Furthermore, the investigation confirmed the levels of la on two proteins associated with tumors, namely USP14 and ABCF1, establishing a solid foundation for further exploration of their roles in HCC pathogenesis.185 Additionally, the roles of histone cit in NET formation and SUMOylation in cell regulation provide promising directions for cancer therapy development. Furthermore, emerging modifications such as bu and bhb underscore the significance of metabolic pathways in cancer progression, offering new therapeutic possibilities (Fig. 4).
Glucose metabolism
Cancer cells primarily rely on glycolysis for energy production. HPTMs, particularly histone la and hib, have the potential to impact cancer therapy by influencing this glycolytic pathway. Some investigations have revealed that p300 possesses 2-hydroxymethylisobutyryltransferase activity, and it modulates cellular glycolysis by amplifying the levels of hib at specific sites in P1. Empirical data indicate that a deficiency in p300 diminishes the activity of enzymes involved in glycolysis, underscoring the potential of modulating hib levels by inhibiting p300 to constrain tumor growth.186 The study suggests that in cells affected by neuroendocrine, prostate, or lung cancer, mitochondria are often more fragmented and show a reduced membrane potential, primarily depending on glycolysis for their energy production. Additionally, the interaction between Numb and Parkin promotes mitophagy, crucial for maintaining mitochondrial quality. The Numb/Parkin pathway acts as a critical metabolic regulator and emerges as a potential therapeutic target in oncology.187 Aspirin notably decreases overall succ levels in liver cancer cells, including the succ of phosphoglycerate mutase 1 (PGAM1), thereby curtailing the glycolytic process.188 For instance, research conducted by Pandkar and their team indicated that decreasing glycolytic activity, especially by inhibiting histone la, significantly reduces the expression of the c-Myc gene, which in turn hinders the advancement of breast cancer.189
Lipid metabolism
Researchers have found that HPTMs, specifically bhb and bu, are closely associated with ketone body metabolism. In dietary screening studies conducted on spontaneous animal models of CRC, researchers discovered that ketogenic diets possess significant tumor-suppressing effects. This anti-tumor efficacy is replicated through the ketone body β-hydroxybutyrate. β-hydroxybutyrate acts by interacting with the surface receptor Hcar2, subsequently inducing the activation of the transcriptional regulator Hopx. This activation leads to alterations in gene expression patterns, effectively inhibiting the proliferation of colonic crypt cells and significantly suppressing intestinal tumor growth.190 Another research indicated that inhibiting the initiation of ketogenesis within the tumor microenvironment is a critical factor in the progression of colorectal cancer. Ketogenic diet has been identified as a key modulator of the tumor microenvironment, capable of diminishing the accumulation of immunosuppressive cells within tumors, enhancing the infiltration of natural killer cells and cytotoxic T cells, and amplifying the anticancer efficacy of PD-1.191 Additionally, another study highlighted the positive impact of a ketogenic diet on cancer treatment by restricting glucose and upregulating histone bu, particularly in relation to breast cancer.192 One research indicates that β-hydroxybutyrate triggers hib on p53 protein at lysine residues 120, 319, and 370. This cascade of precise molecular regulatory actions leads to a reduction in the ac levels of p53, which in turn permeates through the downstream gene network, significantly suppressing the expression of the genes p21 and PUMA. Ultimately, this series of intracellular signaling events acts in concert to effectively inhibit the proliferation of cancer cells and induces them towards the path of apoptosis, thereby playing a pivotal role in anti-cancer strategies.148 However, the possible benefits of a ketogenic diet in cancer treatment, but its definitive effectiveness is still uncertain.193 Studies have shown that after long-term treatment, the accumulation of β-hydroxybutyrate and glucose restriction did not significantly affect the levels of bu or ac of histone H3 in cancer cells. Researchers believe that the metabolic plasticity of cancer cells, through limiting glucose and the enrichment of histone modifications, can mitigate or neutralize the effects of long-term metabolic reprogramming. This provides new insights into the controversial mechanism of action of ketogenic diets in clinical trials.192
Glutamine metabolism
Cancer cells rely extensively on glutamine to fuel their growth, utilizing it in processes like lipid synthesis, the tricarboxylic acid cycle, and for generating amino acids and nucleotides. This ‘addiction’ to glutamine in cancer cells underlines its critical role in the metabolism of tumor cells. Glutamine, absorbed from plasma through different amino acid transporters and transformed into glutamate by mitochondrial glutaminase, plays a pivotal role in glutaminolysis. This process is considered a primary target in the development of cancer therapeutics.194 Existing research has outlined the importance of histone ac and glutamine metabolism in cancer, yet the impact of other HPTMs in this context is still not fully understood. Future studies aim to explore their interaction in cancer treatment, potentially identifying new therapy targets. Furthermore, some studies have pinpointed that HPTMs, particularly hib, have a pronounced association with carbohydrate metabolism.195
HPTMs and genome topology
Within the genomes of animals and plants, the chromatin structure is organized into two distinct compartments: A (euchromatin) and B (heterochromatin), each characterized by structural differences.196 These compartments are further delineated into topologically associating domains, or TADs. Within the elegant model organism C. elegans, the demethylase of H4K20ma2 stands as one of the key complexes that catalyze the emergence of these TADs.197 H3K9 ma plays a crucial role in the compartmentalization of the 3D genome. The deliberate localization of the enzyme that catalyzes the formation of H3K9ma3 to designated sites within human cells, achieved through dCas9-mediated guidance, fosters the tethering of chromatin to HP1α condensates. This strategic recruitment induces a substantial reconfiguration of the chromatin compartments, exemplifying the capacity of targeted histone modifications to alter nuclear architecture.198,199,200 Moreover, H3K27ma3 is equally pivotal in the spatial organization of the genome. It is essential for the formation of chromatin regions known as Polycomb-associated domains, or PADs, through the recruitment of PRC1, yet it is not requisite for their maintenance.201 These findings indicate that the genesis of TADs may be delicately orchestrated through the synergistic interactions between DNA and histone modifications. Collectively, HPTMs are deeply entwined with the governance of DNA replication, repair, transcription, and the three-dimensional organization of the genome, serving as pivotal elements in ensuring genomic stability and functionality.
The role of novel Hptms in diseases
Cancers
Histone modifications regulate a myriad of physiological mechanisms. Thus, it is unsurprising that their dysregulation is implicated in various complications and diseases. Yet, among the array of conditions bearing the hallmark of epigenetic aberrations, cancer stands as the most thoroughly investigated and distinctly characterized ‘epigenetic disease.’ Feinberg, Ohlsson, and Henikoff have posited that the trajectory of tumorigenesis advances through a tripartite progression: (a) the initial epigenetic disarray within stem/progenitor cells, orchestrated by the aberrant regulation of tumor progenitor genes; (b) the subsequent genetic perturbations affecting tumor suppressor genes and oncogenes; and (c) a phase of compounded genetic and epigenetic volatility, culminating in an accelerated pace of tumor evolution.202 DNA ma and various histone modifications play a role in this process, potentially silencing tumor suppressor genes or compromising genomic stability, ultimately resulting in cancer203,204 (Fig. 5, 6).
Ocular melanoma
Yu et al. discovered that histone 1a can activate the m6A reader protein YTHDF2, which is capable of recognizing m6A modifications on PER1 and TP53 mRNA, thereby promoting their degradation and accelerating the progression of ocular melanoma.205,206 Utilizing western blot analysis, researchers uncovered a correlation between increased histone la and adverse outcomes in ocular melanoma patients. A notable feature of many ocular melanomas is the elevated histone la, which might contribute to the tumorigenesis of ocular melanoma.205
Bladder cancer
a study suggests that the circXRN2-Hippo signaling pathway plays a role in controlling tumor advancement by suppressing H3K18la and regulating the expression of LCN2 in cases of human bladder cancer.207
Acute myeloid leukemia (AML)
Clinically, researchers have found a positive correlation between the accumulation of lactate in the bone marrow of AML patients and the expression of STAT5 and PD-L1. This correlation is attributed to the overexpression of STAT5 promoting the nuclear translocation of E3BP, thereby activating the promoters of glycolytic genes, which in turn stimulates histone la and induces the transcription of PD-L1. This suggests that patients exhibiting high expression and subsequent production of lactate may benefit more from immunotherapies targeting the PD-1/PD-L1 axis.208
Liu and colleagues discovered pr of histone H3 in mammalian cells. Using specific antibodies of pr, they further detected pr in the leukemia cell line U937. The team observed a significant reduction in H3K23 pr within these leukemia cells. Based on these findings, it is conjectured that histone pr might have implications in the pathogenesis of leukemia and potentially serve as a diagnostic marker for therapeutic interventions in leukemia.65
Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC)
Studies have indicated that the expression of histone la is closely associated with cancer prognosis. Particularly in ccRCC, the inactivation of the VHL gene directly increases the expression of histone la, which correlates with poor patient outcomes. Furthermore, the expression of histone la, induced by the inactive state of VHL, further accelerates the development of ccRCC by promoting the transcription of PDGFRβ. In turn, the activation of PDGFRβ also stimulates the transcription of histone la, creating a positive feedback loop that hastens tumor progression. These findings offer significant insights into the molecular mechanisms of ccRCC and may inform the development of therapeutic strategies.209
Colorectal cancer(CRC)
At the same time, research indicates that the activity of histone la is associated with tumor metastasis and aggressiveness. Wang and colleagues found that lipopolysaccharides from intestinal bacteria can upregulate the expression of LINC00152 in colorectal and breast cancers,210 affecting the tumor microenvironment. This upregulation is achieved through an increase in histone la activity induced by lipopolysaccharides and a reduction in the binding affinity of the repressive factor YY1, subsequently promoting LINC00152 expression. Further studies have revealed that overexpression of LINC00152 enhances the migratory and invasive capabilities of cancer cells, highlighting its pivotal role in cancer progression.211
The research conducted by Qu and colleagues has revealed that under hypoxic conditions, HIF-300α promotes the development of cancer cells by recruiting p300/CBP to increase Autotaxin(ATX) expression, particularly through the crotonylation of H3 in colon cancer cells, thereby activating ATX. Moreover, the increase of histone crotonylation under normoxic conditions can also initiate the expression of ATX.212 In parallel, Liao’s team has established a link between histone crotonylation and DNA damage activity in CRC patients through bioinformatics and Western blot techniques. These findings further highlight the significant roles of histone crotonylation and the cancer therapeutic target ATX in cancer progression.213
Hou and his team evaluated the association between histone cr and tumor staging as well as diagnostic outcomes. Their investigation showed a notable increase in H2BK12 cr within the peripheral blood mononuclear cells from patients with CRC. Through ROC curve analysis, it was discerned that utilizing H2BK12cr levels as a diagnostic criterion significantly surpassed conventional carcinoembryonic antigen tests in terms of simplicity and efficacy, thereby highlighting its considerable potential as a tumor biomarker.214 Challenging previous views, Liu et al.‘s recent research reveals a new role for histone cr beyond gene activation. Their study suggests that cr at histone H3 lysine 27 (H3K27cr) primarily acts as a suppressor rather than an enhancer of gene transcription. They found that the YEATS domain within the GAS41-SIN3A-HDAC1 complex uniquely recognizes H3K27cr in chromatin. Remarkably, the transcription factor associated with proto-oncogenes, MYC, recruits this complex to repress gene expression within chromatin subsequently. Furthermore, their experiments on mice revealed that either the knockdown of GAS41 or the deletion of H3K27cr binding can contribute to the inhibition of tumor growth. This sheds light on the novel role that histone cr plays in tumorigenesis.215
Hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC)
A study involving patients with hepatitis B virus-related HCC revealed an increase in histone H3 cit levels, which is closely associated with Beclin1 mRNA expression, vascular invasion, and serum AFP levels, reflecting a critical aspect of liver cancer progression.216
Significantly, HAT1, conventionally acknowledged as a HAT, has been additionally recognized for its succinyltransferase activity. In their quantitative proteomic analysis of HepG2 cancer cells, Yang and colleagues discovered that HAT1 coordinates the succinylation of a wide array of proteins, including histones and non-histone proteins. Furthermore, their investigations revealed that HAT1 is capable of H3K122succ, subsequently promoting favorable gene expression patterns within cancer cells. Clinically, elevated HAT1 levels have been observed in various cancerous tissues, such as HCC, pancreatic carcinoma, and cholangiocarcinoma. Therefore, it can be inferred that the succinyltransferase function of HAT1, coupled with the succ of PGAM1 mediated by HAT1, stands as a critical mechanism driving tumor progression.217
In 2016, Zhao et al. revealed that 2-hydroxybutyric acid can act as a foundation for the bhb of histones, activating gene expression. Intrinsically, β-hydroxybutyrate is a primary component of ketone bodies. This significant elevation in bhb levels effectively links gene expression to ketone body metabolism.218 Tumor cells demand substantial energy for growth, and in contrast to normal cells, this energy predominantly comes from glycolysis.219 Existing studies indicate that β-hydroxybutyrate or β-hydroxybutyrate-induced HPTMs may have pivotal roles in the onset and treatment of tumors. Scientists have observed that the build-up of β-hydroxybutyrate followed by the elevated presence of H3K9bhb in living organisms, mediated by MTA2, can initiate a cascade response fostering the progression of HCC. Additionally, it has been noted that the upregulation of the genes JMJD6, GREB3, GTPBP4, NPM1 and TIMM23 can affect the prognosis of HCC patients.220
Gastric cancer
In a distinct study, Zheng and colleagues provided persuasive findings showing that PADI2 plays a crucial role in promoting angiogenesis, cellular growth, movement, and influencing the tumor immune environment. This is achieved by amplifying the expression of CXCR2, KRT14 and TNF-α, thereby facilitating the onset of gastric cancer.221 Additionally, another study vividly showcased the close association between group mono-leuco-citrullination and IPO-38, emphasizing the potential of the latter as a biomarker for early gastric cancer detection.222
Prostate cancer(PCa)
In PCa research, Wang and colleagues discovered the crucial function of PADI2 in cell viability and cell cycle advancement. Their findings indicate that PADI2 facilitates the growth of prostate cancer cells.223 In a separate investigation, it was determined that PAD2 influences breast cancer by modulating histone cit.224
The research led by Xu and his team has accentuated the role of histone cr in PCa, uncovering that levels of histone cr are significantly elevated in PCa tissues compared to adjacent normal tissues and are closely associated with the severity of the disease. Through immunohistochemical analysis of 72 PCa patient samples and laboratory assays on three human PCa cell lines—including quantification by Western blot, as well as assessments of cell proliferation, migration, and invasion—the study unveiled potential mechanisms of histone cr in cancer progression. These findings suggest a significant correlation between the expression of histone cr and the clinical staging and grading of PCa, indicating its potential as both a prognostic marker and a therapeutic target.225
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
Histone succ is modulated by KAT2A, an enzyme exhibiting both lysine acetyltransferase and succinyltransferase functionalities. Investigations have revealed that KAT2A is not only abundantly manifested in human pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma but also displays a positive correlation with the progressed stages of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and a diminished patient survival rate. It is demonstrated that KAT2A augments the migration and invasiveness of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma cells through the regulation of 14-3-3ζ and β-catenin expression.129 The nuclear-localized α-ketoglutarate dehydrogenase complex in human cells has been identified to associate with KAT2A at the gene’s promoter region. KAT2A has the capability to execute succ on lysine 79 of histone H3. Acting as a succinyltransferase, KAT2A induces succ of histone H79 at lysine 3, predominantly occurring in proximity to the gene’s transcriptional initiation site. Experimental findings suggest that by obstructing the nuclear entry of the α-ketoglutarate dehydrogenase complex or suppressing the expression of KAT2A (Tyr645Ala), one can diminish gene expression, which consequently reduces the proliferation of tumor cells and overall tumor expansion.126 Concurrently, studies have shown that genomic instability is a hallmark of cancer.226 This association between histone succ and DNA damage has been underscored by several studies.227 To sum up, research has demonstrated that histone succ, regulated by KAT2A or HAT1, is pivotal in governing gene expression. This regulation significantly contributes to the growth, advancement, and metastasis of cancer cells.
Lu and his team, utilizing liquid chromatography and LC-MS/MS techniques, have for the first time identified histone hib sites in patients with pancreatic cancer. They discovered that histone modifications involving hib affect key metabolic pathways such as glycolysis, gluconeogenesis, and the TCA cycle, highlighting the significance of hib in the metabolism of pancreatic cancer. Moreover, the inhibition of Tip60 significantly suppresses the growth, migration, and invasion of pancreatic cancer, which correlates with the downregulation of hib. These results suggest that histone hib modifications are closely linked to the progression of pancreatic cancer.228 Additionally, predictive analyses using IPA software have revealed the role of actin cytoskeleton regulatory pathways in the development of oral squamous cell carcinoma, pointing to the regulation of actin assembly and stability as potential key mechanisms in cancer progression.229
Non-small cell lung cancer(NSCLC)
Furthermore, Tanikawa and his team observed in NSCLC that the levels of histone H4R3 cit are inversely proportional to p53 expression and tumor size, and that the p53 pathway, mediated by PADI4, significantly affects tumorigenesis.230
In essence, the citrullination-induced NET seems to ominously forecast a grim prognosis in the realm of cancer. An extensive analysis with long-term patient follow-up in cases of cancer-related VTE revealed a significant correlation: the cit status of histone H3 was strongly associated with VTE. This discovery strongly underscores the vital importance of NETs in the progression of VTE within oncogenic settings.231 Similarly, another investigative endeavor revealed an intriguing observation: elevated plasma concentrations of the NET biomarker, citrullinated histone H3 (H3cit), were concomitant with the onset of VTE in individuals diagnosed with pancreatic and lung cancers.232 In preliminary studies, researchers have observed a marked elevation in the levels of citrullinated H3cit in the plasma of patients with advanced cancer, and this elevation is tightly associated with the patients’ prognosis. The significant increase in H3cit levels nearly doubled the short-term mortality risk for patients, strongly highlighting its immense potential as a prognostic biomarker for cancer.233
Prolactinomas
For instance, DeVore and colleagues discovered that in prolactinomas, the activity of PAD2 and PAD4 and the levels of histone cit are elevated, promoting tumor growth. This process facilitates tumor development and proliferation through the downregulation of microRNAs, such as let-7c-2 and 29c.234
Others
In another investigation, core histone lysine bu sites, such as H3K18, H3K23, H3K79 and H4K77, were identified in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma cell lines.12
It has been shown that histone SUMOylation can function as a transcriptional repressor. This repression is primarily achieved either by disrupting histone ac or by interfering with the ubiquitination of H2BK123 through Rad6 and Bre1.131 The SUMO system comprises the activation enzyme E1, the conjugation enzyme E2 and the ligating enzyme E3. The E1 and E2 enzymes are limited in variety—E1 encompasses SAE1 and SAE2, while UBC9 is the sole E2 enzyme. In contrast, E3 enzymes possess a more extensive range owing to their diverse specificities, which facilitate binding to various substrates.235 Existing scholarly works indicate that Ubc9 holds a key role in regulating processes such as the cell cycle, cell growth, mitotic division, programmed cell death and DNA restoration. The direct correlation of Ubc9’s role in tumors histone SUMOylation remains somewhat nebulous. Nevertheless, the SUMOylation of multiple proteins is ascertained to significantly influence tumorigenesis. Significantly, increased levels of Ubc9 have been detected in a range of cancers such as lung,236 prostate,237 ovarian,238 bladder cancer239 and melanoma.240 One research demonstrates that inhibiting UBC9 curtails tumor development in mouse xenograft models, while the depletion of Ubc9 fosters STAT4-mediated macrophage activation. This activation, coupled with enhanced macrophage-CD8 + T-cell communication, serves to thwart tumor progression.237 The connection between SUMOylation and the onset of cancer is widely acknowledged, and continued investigation in this area is expected.
P53, recognized as a pivotal tumor suppressor, undergoes modification through bhb at lysines 120, 319 and 370. Under conditions of starvation, researchers noted an elevation in 2-hydroxybutyric acid serum concentrations in mice, accompanied by a rise in p53 bhb. This process hampers the ac of p53, leading to the cessation of cellular proliferation and a reduction in programmed cell death.148 This suggests to us the role of bhb in ketone metabolism and tumor management.
The role of histone modifications in cancer is multifaceted: different types of cancer, and even individual cases within the same cancer type, may exhibit distinct patterns of histone modifications. This underscores the highly heterogeneous nature of cancer as a disease, necessitating further research to better harness the potential of histone modifications in treatment and prognostic applications.
Infectious diseases
Infectious diseases are complex biological processes closely associated with autoimmunity and inflammation. During the course of infection, microbes can induce epigenetic modifications, such as the suppression or promotion of expression of various inflammasomes.241,242 Numerous reports have mentioned the pivotal role of HPTMs such as phosphorylation, acetylation, or methylation in the pathogenesis of viral infections—including Herpes Simplex Virus, Hepatitis B Virus, and Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)—as well as in sepsis models. However, research on the mechanisms related to novel HPTMs in the context of infectious bacterial or viral diseases remains scant.243,244,245 Research has found that all subjects, including healthy volunteers, express H3K18la; however, individuals with septic shock exhibit the highest levels. This suggests that H3K18la may reflect the severity of critical illness and the presence of infection. H3K18la could potentially regulate the anti-inflammatory function of macrophages in sepsis by promoting the expression of inflammatory cytokines and the overexpression of Arg1.246
Studies have demonstrated that by augmenting the expression of ACSS2 (Acyl-CoA Synthetase Short-chain Family Member 2), histone cr can be induced, thereby reactivating latent HIV. Pharmacological inhibition or siRNA-mediated knockdown of ACSS2 can reduce HIV replication and activation. Moreover, when used in conjunction with protein kinase C agonists or histone deacetylase inhibitors, ACSS2 can efficiently reactivate latent HIV. In simian models of HIV, an increase in ACSS2 expression correlates with alterations in fatty acid metabolism. This research links ACSS2 with HIV latency and offers a potential new target for HIV eradication strategies.116 The study by Jiang et al. suggests that histone cr is an epigenetic modification present on the long terminal repeats of HIV, which modulates the transcription and latency of the virus. Inhibition of cr can prevent the reactivation of latent HIV, indicating that the suppression of cr could contribute to the maintenance of HIV latency, offering a potential target for controlling and reducing the incidence of AIDS.116
Cardiovascular diseases
Recent research findings indicate that histone la is critical for the preservation of cardiac sarcomere structure and function. This modification is specifically directed at the α-myosin heavy chain (α-MHC), which is a major contractile protein in the myocardium. La strengthens the interaction between α-MHC and titin247—a key sarcomeric protein that supports the elasticity and integrity of muscle tissue—thereby la contributes to maintaining myocardial contractile function. Scholars hypothesize that augmenting α-MHC la could emerge as an innovative therapeutic approach for combating heart failure. This hypothesis suggests that focusing on α-MHC la presents a potential new avenue for treatment strategies in heart failure management. Myocardial infarction triggers a complex inflammatory response, which is crucial for the control of acute damage and subsequent cardiac repair.248 The initial cellular response encompasses a systemic emergency hematopoiesis reaction coupled with the swift mobilization of neutrophils and monocytes to the site of action.249,250 A sustained excessive inflammatory response can exacerbate myocardial damage and cardiac dysfunction. The prompt initiation of reparative signaling within monocytes and macrophages is critical for the expeditious re-establishment of immune equilibrium and the commencement of the healing process post-myocardial infarction.251,252 Research suggests that histone la can influence the anti-inflammatory and pro-angiogenic behavior of monocyte-macrophage cells, thereby promoting the transcription of genes associated with repair. This contributes to a healing milieu and enhances cardiac performance post-myocardial infarction. These insights uncover the pivotal function of IL-1β-induced recruitment of GCN5 (General Control Non-repressed 5) to histone H3K18la, shedding light on its possible role as a regulatory precursor for monocyte histone la and the subsequent expression of genes involved in repair following myocardial infarction.253
Vascular diseases are associated with changes in PAD activity and citrullinated proteins.254,255,256,257,258,259,260,261 In cardiomyocytes and fibroblasts, PAD2 and PAD4 have been identified as the predominant isoforms.262 HPTMs of myofibrillar proteins in cardiomyocytes, such as cit, phosphorylation, oxidation, and ac, can lead to alterations in the structure and function of these proteins, resulting in diminished cardiac contractility.262 In ischemic heart diseases, there is a marked increase in the cit of myosin heavy chains, and in patients with heart failure, there is an elevated cit of cardiac contractile proteins by PAD2.262 PAD4 induces the formation of NETs, activates platelets, and promotes the secretion of transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-β), ultimately contributing to cardiac fibrosis.263,264 Moreover, the absence of PAD4 has been shown to confer cardioprotection in mice.263 Extracellular DNA or NETs adversely affect cardiac function following acute myocardial infarction injury.265 Chromatin remodeling is crucial for controlling gene expression and cardiac growth in response to acute and chronic stimuli.266,267 Moreover, in various models of deep vein thrombosis, it has been demonstrated that NETs can instigate coagulation. NETosis, a form of inflammatory programmed cell death, has the potential to precipitate harmful pathologies, including small vessel vasculitis, sepsis, systemic lupus erythematosus, and deep vein thrombosis, illustrating its significant yet potentially detrimental role in these conditions257,268,269 (Fig. 7).
Metabolic disease
An increasing body of research suggests that epigenetic mechanisms mediated by histone modifications may constitute a potential etiology for Type 2 Diabetes. In a prediabetic state, researchers conducted a systematic analysis of HPTMs of histones in the liver of a mouse model of obesity induced by a high-fat diet. They uncovered novel alterations in modifications such as ac, bu, ma, and succ, hinting that these recently revealed histone ac events may play a latent role in the development and progression of diabetes and obesity. Notably, the study also found that metformin could reverse certain specific histone modification markers, such as changes in histone H3K36ma2.15 Research indicates that levels of malonyl-CoA are elevated in the muscles of obese and type 2 diabetes patients, underscoring the possibility that certain histone modifications may be intricately linked with the progression of these conditions.270 In particular, bhb has been identified as a marker of active genes during starvation or diabetes ketosis induced by streptozotocin, with this modification closely associated with the metabolic pathways of the starvation response. Additionally, ketogenesis stimulated by starvation increased both bhb and bu, while the observed rise in malonylated proteins in a diabetes mouse model affected glucose and fatty acid metabolic pathways, suggesting that these modifications could potentially reverse insulin resistance.17,271,272
The ablation of Pkm2 in endothelial cells leads to diminished serum lactate levels, which subsequently influences histone la within bone marrow stromal stem cells (BMSCs). This particular la modification is crucial for the differentiation of BMSCs into osteoblasts, which are the principal cells responsible for bone synthesis. Histone H3K18 la modulates several genes vital for osteogenesis, such as type I collagen α2 chain (COL1A2), cartilage oligomeric matrix protein, ectonucleotide pyrophosphatase/phosphodiesterase 1 (ENPP1), and transcription factor 7-like 2. Therapeutic strategies such as the upregulation of PKM2 in endothelial cells, exogenous lactate supplementation, and physical exercise have shown efficacy in reversing the compromised phenotype in mice with a deficit in endothelial PKM2, indicating promising avenues for osteoporosis treatment.273
Reproductive disease
Emergent HPTMs are associated with sperm maturation impairments and developmental anomalies that may impact male fertility. The bromodomains of BRDT can recognize histone ac and recruit transcription complexes to chromatin, thereby promoting the expression of specific genes.274 Studies suggest that ac and bu at H4K5 and H4K8 positions compete at gene promoters bound by highly active BRDT, with bu also marking the delayed removal of histones during late spermatogenesis.72 Research has unveiled that the chromodomain Y-like transcriptional corepressor (CDYL) acts as a negative regulator of histone cr. Functioning as a crotonyl-CoA hydratase, CDYL catalyzes the conversion of crotonyl-CoA to β-hydroxybutyryl-CoA, effectively diminishing the pool of crotonyl-CoA available for the crotonylation of histone lysine residues. The function of CDYL-mediated histone cr regulation is particularly significant in spermatogenesis. Research indicates that dysregulation of histone cr in CDYL transgenic mice leads to decreased male fertility, characterized by reduced epididymal sperm counts and impaired sperm motility. The study suggests that histone cr regulation by CDYL might be associated with spermatogenic failure in infertile males with AZFc deletions. This link may provide a new avenue for exploring therapeutic strategies or diagnosing certain types of male infertility.114 There exists a clear necessity for additional studies to deepen our comprehension of how novel HPTMs might influence reproductive anomalies.
Neuropsychiatric disease
Epigenetic modifications have been found to be of significant importance in neurological conditions such as PD, Huntington’s disease, AD, and Major Depressive Disorder (MDD).275,276,277 Contemporary studies propose that the onset of MDD may be intricately tied to several physiological and biochemical phenomena. These include the activation of the corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH)/hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, excessive stimulation of the sympathetic nervous system, irregular secretion patterns of monoaminergic neurotransmitters, increased production of pro-inflammatory cytokines, diminished levels of neurotrophic factors, and significant epigenetic modifications.278,279,280,281,282,283 Epigenetics may serve as one of the bridges linking environmental and genetic factors. Stressful events can lead to alterations in epigenetic modifications, thereby causing changes in gene expression.
MDD emerges as a complex condition influenced by a broad array of factors, including environmental, genetic, psychological, and biological determinants. Those afflicted with MDD may endure profound symptoms that encompass enduring and intense feelings of sadness and desolation, cognitive impairments, anhedonia, diminished verbal and motor activity, along with disruptions in sleep patterns.284,285 Contemporary research indicates that significant stress events can precipitate modifications in histone configurations within the human brain, catalyzing transcriptional alterations that may culminate in the onset of MDD. Histone ma, ac, phosphorylation, cr, and bhb have all been identified as modifications intricately linked with the pathogenesis of MDD. Of particular interest in our discussion are the relationships between histone cr, bhb, and MDD.286 The investigation conducted by Liu and colleagues illuminates that MDD, precipitated by sustained social defeat stress, correlates with a diminished presence of histone crotonylation. This reduction is observed alongside the upregulated expression of CDYL, suggesting a potential mechanistic interplay in the manifestation of MDD. This study is the first and, to date, the only one that demonstrates the link between MDD and histone crotonylation. Initially, researchers discovered that β-hydroxybutyrate, as a ketone body, plays a significant role in neuro-related disorders. It was found that bhb can protect neurons from toxic damage and prevent the degenerative changes in dopaminergic neurons seen in Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s diseases.146,147 Recent research suggests that β-hydroxybutyrate may possess antidepressant effects for Major MDD induced by chronic unpredictable stress.287,288,289 Chen and colleagues were the first to associate the antidepressant effects of β-hydroxybutyrate with histone modifications. In mice with MDD induced by spatial restriction stress, they observed a reduction in the levels of H3K9bhb. Injections of β-hydroxybutyrate were found to increase both β-hydroxybutyrate and H3K9bhb levels, as well as enhance the expression of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF).290 This deduction posits that H3K9bhb could serve as a pivotal regulatory factor for the expression of BDNF, hinting at the role of histone bhb as a significant avenue for unraveling the underpinning mechanisms of MDD.
At present, the pharmacological treatment of depression in clinical settings classifies antidepressants into seven primary categories: selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), serotonin antagonists and reuptake inhibitors, serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, norepinephrine-dopamine reuptake inhibitors, tricyclic antidepressants, monoamine oxidase inhibitors, and melatonergic antidepressants. Each class operates via distinct mechanisms to modulate neurotransmitter systems and alleviate depressive symptoms.291 These medications chiefly exert their effects by inhibiting the activity of serotonin and norepinephrine. However, approximately 40% of MDD patients exhibit insensitivity to these drugs. Consequently, the development of more effective and less toxic antidepressant medications is imperative.292 Furthermore, the emerging focus among researchers on antidepressants that influence histone modifications, especially HDAC inhibitors, highlights a novel approach in the therapeutic landscape of MDD. These inhibitors have shown promise in alleviating symptoms of MDD by modulating epigenetic mechanisms. Bhb may be a critical factor in ketogenic diets, exhibiting broader and more pronounced neuroprotective effects in ameliorating refractory epilepsy compared to traditional restrictive diets.293
Others
In the study of pulmonary fibrosis, it was found that lung myofibroblasts, under the stimulation of TGF-β1, exhibit increased glycolytic activity, leading to the substantial production of lactate. This lactate accumulates not only in vitro cultures but is also detected in mice with a model of pulmonary fibrosis. Lactate promotes histone la via p300, enhancing the expression of pro-fibrotic genes and propelling the progression of lung fibrosis. Additionally, exposure to PM2.5 augments glycolytic activity, increasing the generation of lactate and other metabolic byproducts. The activation of the TGF-β/Smad2/3 and VEGFA/ERK pathways instigates the development of pulmonary fibrosis. The application of an LDHA inhibitor, specifically GNE-140, as a pre-treatment strategy, has been shown to significantly mitigate pulmonary inflammation and fibrosis triggered by PM2.5, showcasing its therapeutic promise in addressing such conditions.294,295
Renal disorders can be categorized into acute kidney injury (AKI) and chronic kidney disease (CKD), with a subset of CKD potentially progressing to end-stage renal disease. Histone cr has been observed in renal tubular cells of healthy mouse and human kidney tissues. During acute AKI, levels of histone cr in renal tissues are elevated. This finding is replicated in vitro in cultured renal tubular cells exposed to the cytokine TWEAK, suggesting that TWEAK may be one of the factors influencing histone cr levels. Experiments involving the administration of crotonate to cultured renal tubular cells or kidneys found that crotonate treatment increased the expression of PGC-1α and sirtuin-3, and decreased the expression of CCL2. Systemic administration of crotonate in animal models can prevent the onset of AKI, maintain renal function, and prevent the decrease in PGC-1α and sirtuin-3 levels, as well as the increase in CCL2 expression.14 Furthermore, analysis based on the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) suggests that proteins modified with hib are enriched in the IL-17 signaling pathway and in categories related to phagosomes. These pathways and categories are considered to be significantly associated with IgAN. The data imply that hib modifications may play a crucial regulatory role in the development and progression of IgAN.296 Chen et al. measured the global levels of cr sites within the proteome of patients with CKD and those undergoing maintenance hemodialysis, finding decreased levels of cr in dialysis patients and increased levels in CKD patients. This suggests that cr may play a significant regulatory role in the transition from AKI to CKD.297 The research conducted by Shimazu and colleagues presents groundbreaking findings on the linkage between β-hydroxybutyrate and renal ailments. It was revealed that β-hydroxybutyrate significantly shields murine kidneys from oxidative stress. This protective effect is achieved through the inhibition of HDAC activity and the augmentation of histone ac at the promoters of Foxo3a and Mt2, thereby unveiling a potential therapeutic avenue for renal diseases.297
Research indicates that Salvianolic acid B can downregulate the expression of lactate dehydrogenase A (LDHA), thereby inhibiting histone la in macrophages, which effectively mitigates carbon tetrachloride-induced liver injury. By examining liver tissues and isolated Kupffer cells, it has been confirmed that Sal B affects the M1 polarization and histone la levels in macrophages.298
In the progression of psoriasis, numerous studies have highlighted that elevated levels of lactate or lactate dehydrogenase are key factors.299,300 Research has shown that elevating global la and H3K18la levels can increase the levels of the adiponectin ADIPOQ protein,301,302,303 whereas transfection with si-LDHA reduces ADIPOQ protein levels. In the skin tissues of psoriasis patients, ADIPOQ levels are significantly reduced, and ADIPOQ possesses the potential for diagnosing psoriasis. Furthermore, the study uncovered that the downregulation of H3K18la levels inhibits the transcriptional activity of the ADIPOQ gene, which is a key factor contributing to the diminished ADIPOQ levels in psoriasis patients 304(Fig. 8).
Targeted therapy of Novel Hptms
In this section, we will categorize the current inhibitors involved in HPTMs into three groups, summarizing their mechanisms of action and clinical applications. Additionally, we will specifically collate inhibitors that are still in the experimental stage (Table 2).
Inhibitors targeting enzymes of novel HPTMs
SIRT inhibitors
Nicotinamide and its derivatives, such as nicotinamide riboside and nicotinamide mononucleotide, are important precursors of NAD + .305 Nicotinamide acts as an endogenous inhibitor of SIRTs and can inhibit SIRT1 and SIRT2.306,307 AK-7 is a selective SIRT2 inhibitor that has demonstrated improvements in behavioral and neuropathological phenotypes, extended lifespan, and ameliorated the neuropathology associated with HD in animal models.308,309 β-naphthol inhibitors encompass a variety of SIRT inhibitors that possess a β-naphthol structure, including splitomicin, sirtinol, salermide, HR-73, and cambinol.310,311 These compounds were discovered through in vitro cellular screenings; for instance, sirtinol and splitomicin are capable of inducing apoptosis and autophagy in cancer cells. A series of Sir2 inhibitors based on the indole structure were identified through large-scale fluorescent screening. These compounds, including EX-527, AC-93253, inauhzin, and Ro31-8220, predominantly inhibit SIRT1 and are associated with enhanced cell survival and p53 acetylation.312,313 SIRT The SIRT rearranging ligand SirReal2 is a potent SIRT2 selective inhibitor that acts by inducing structural rearrangement and interacting with an unknown binding site, leading to increased acetylation of chromatin protein H3.314 Discovered through phenotypic screening, tenovin-1 and its more water-soluble analog tenovin-6 primarily inhibit SIRT1 and SIRT2, decreasing tumor growth both in vitro and in vivo.315 Additional SIRT inhibitors, including a range of compounds such as suramin, aristoforin, AGK2, and Tripos 360702, have demonstrated the ability to inhibit SIRT activity. These compounds show potential in inhibiting cancer cell growth and modulating cell signaling pathways.316,317,318,319
While there have been significant advancements in the research of SIRT modulators over the past few decades, the studies have been uneven, and their clinical potential remains underexploited. Current investigations have adequately covered inhibitors of SIRT1 and SIRT2, yet research on inhibitors for SIRT3-7 is still lacking. Moreover, research on SIRT activators has primarily focused on SIRT1; there is a need for further exploration into activators and inhibitors for other SIRT family members to fully harness the therapeutic potential of SIRT molecules.320
PAD inhibitors
PADs are a group of active enzymes that catalyze the irreversible HPTMs of arginine to citrulline.321,322 Through this process, the structure and function of numerous target proteins are altered, including fibrinogen, TGF-β, nicotinamide N-methyltransferase, cytokines, and chemokines.323,324 Cit serves as a biomarker for various diseases, particularly in instances of dysregulated PAD activity.321,322 Five PAD isoforms, PAD1 through PAD4 and PAD6, have been identified in mammals.325 PAD1, PAD2, and PAD4 localize to both the cytoplasm and the nucleus, where they can citrullinate histones and other chromatin-associated proteins.326 All PAD isoforms, with the exception of PAD6, exhibit catalytic activity.327,328 The PAD family plays a role in regulating multiple biological processes, including cell differentiation, apoptosis, innate immune responses, embryonic development, myelination, and gene regulation.329
Inhibitors targeting PAD4 are delineated into two classes: irreversible inhibitors and reversible inhibitors. The irreversible category encompasses compounds such as F-amidine, o-Cl-amidine, BB-Cl-amidine, Cl-amidine, YW-356, o-F-amidine, Thr-Asp-F-amidine, and Thr-Asp-Cl-amidine. On the other hand, reversible inhibitors comprise agents like GSK199, streptonigrin, GSK484, along with select antirheumatic medications. These distinct groups of PAD4 inhibitors offer various therapeutic approaches for conditions involving this enzyme.259 The mechanism by which 2-fluoroacetamidine, Cl-amidine, and F-amidine exert their inhibitory effects involves a primary assault on the carbonyl carbon of the thiolate anion at Cys645. This action precipitates the creation of a protonated tetrahedral intermediate, noted for its stability, which underscores the inhibitory process of these compounds.330 The potency of o-F-amidine is 65 times that of F-amidine, with selectivity for PAD1 being at least sixfold higher than for PADs 2-4.331 This indicates that o-F-amidine has significant advantages in selectivity and potency. Despite the identification of numerous PAD inhibitors, the efficacy of most is limited.332 Variations exist among covalent PAD inhibitors in terms of in vivo stability, bioavailability, and isozyme selectivity, such as D-Cl-amidine (a selective inhibitor for PAD1), Cl4-amidine (selective for PAD3), and Thr-Asp-F-amidine (TDFA, a selective inhibitor for PAD4).321 Most reversible inhibitors, like minocycline, paclitaxel, and streptonigrin, are weaker PAD inhibitors, yet GSK484 and GSK199 are potent and selective inhibitors targeting PAD4.333 Cl-amidine, a haloacetamidine class PAD inhibitor, exhibits a higher selectivity for PAD4. It can prevent vascular abnormalities, arterial thrombosis, endothelial dysfunction, and aberrant vascular repair in systemic lupus erythematosus, as well as inhibit the formation of NETs, reduce the area of atherosclerotic lesions, and prolong carotid thrombus formation time in Apolipoprotein E knockout mice.334 Recent studies have demonstrated that PAD4 inactivation can protect murine hearts from damage after myocardial infarction/reperfusion injury.265 Furthermore, the Cl-amidine analog YW3-56, with improved bioavailability, can modify the gene encoding the upstream inhibitor of the mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1, SESN2.335 Treatment with Cl-amidine reduces histone citrullination in neutrophils and prevents NET formation.336 BB-Cl-amidine, a second-generation PAD inhibitor, alters T-cell immune responses and decreases the severity of inflammation in arthritis.337 Both Cl-amidine and BB-Cl-amidine are potent PAD inhibitors in various anti-tumor models.336,338
The development and application of PAD inhibitors represent a significant advancement in the field of cancer therapy, targeting the cit process, which is crucial in various cancer-related processes including tumor growth and metastasis.91,339 PAD inhibitors can significantly decrease the proliferation of cancer cells without affecting the viability of normal cells.340 Compounds such as Cl-amidine and F-amidine have demonstrated efficacy in inducing differentiation and apoptosis in various cancer cell lines, including HL60, HT29, TK6, and U2OS.341 PAD4 inhibitors have been used clinically to prevent tumor dissemination and treat cancer-associated thrombosis. Effective PAD inhibitors can enhance anti-tumor activity by inhibiting CitH3 in tumors; for instance, in castration-resistant prostate cancer, PAD2-H3Cit26 is considered a novel therapeutic target.223,342 Moreover, the combination of PAD inhibitors and HDAC inhibitors is regarded as a strategy for cancer therapy. Compounds such as paclitaxel, minocycline, and streptomycin have been identified as PAD inhibitors; however, due to their poor binding efficacy, they exhibit relatively weak and suboptimal therapeutic effects.343 Newer compounds such as O-F-amidine and O-Cl-amidine have shown greater therapeutic efficacy, selectivity, and bioavailability. O-F-amidine, in particular, is markedly more effective than its predecessors, demonstrating an activity 65 times stronger than that of F-amidine and exhibiting a greater preference for PAD1 inhibition.344 Recent developments include YW3-56, which not only inhibits PAD4 but also modulates key signaling pathways such as mTORC1, and can obstruct the autophagy of cancer cells, thereby inhibiting their growth.345 Continued pharmacological innovation is needed to develop PAD inhibitors with improved selectivity, efficacy, and fewer side effects. This includes targeting specific PAD enzymes that are predominantly expressed in malignant cells without affecting normal tissues.
Histone cit has been identified as a biomarker and therapeutic target in cancer, particularly as PAD4-mediated cit of histone H3 is associated with poor clinical outcomes and a high rate of short-term mortality in patients with advanced cancer, and it can also predict the risk of venous thromboembolism.231,233,346 Studies have also indicated that PAD2-mediated cit of histone H3 at arginine 26 promotes malignant progression in multiple myeloma and prostate cancer.223,347 Targeting both PAD4 and HDAC2 concurrently emerges as a promising approach in osteosarcoma therapy. This strategy capitalizes on the regulatory capability of histone citrullination to modulate the expression of the tumor suppressor gene OKL38. Such a dual inhibition mechanism suggests a significant potential for therapeutic intervention in osteosarcoma, highlighting a nuanced understanding of histone modifications in cancer treatment.91,348 Furthermore, PAD4 inhibitors are utilized to prevent tumor metastasis and thrombosis associated with insulinomas and breast cancer,349 and to inhibit hematogenous metastasis of gastric cancer by targeting citrullination-mediated NETs with herbal compounds.350 These findings underscore the significance of developing PAD inhibitors that target specific cit sites for cancer treatment and offer new directions for future cancer diagnostics and therapeutics.
The PAD4 protein has emerged as a promising therapeutic target for cancer, offering specific targeting capabilities and a favorable in vivo safety profile against tumor cells. Recognized as an antitumor agent, phenylboronic acid (PBA) can target both primary and metastatic tumors. In this context, researchers have endeavored to enhance PAD4 protein inhibitors by incorporating various PBA components, culminating in the development of highly targeted PAD4 inhibitors. Various experiments have revealed that the m-PBA-modified PAD4 inhibitor, labeled as 5i, exhibited pronounced antitumor activity. Importantly, compound 5i did not act by directly destroying cancer cells; instead, it played a substantial role in curbing the spread of tumor cells. Moreover, the compound named ta3 was found to reduce H3cit in the cell nucleus. The study determined that inhibitors of PBA-PAD4 effectively hinder both the proliferation and spread of breast cancer cells and significantly diminish the development of NETs within the cancerous tissue. This inhibitory action stems from the specific targeting of the PAD4 protein in the nuclei of neutrophils. Furthermore, the PBA-PAD4 inhibitor demonstrated remarkable antitumor activity, suggesting a novel approach for designing efficacious PAD4 inhibitors.351
Evodia alkaloid effectively inhibits the la of histones and the expression of HIF1A in PCa cells, thereby obstructing the process of lactate-induced angiogenesis. Simultaneously, it enhances the transcription of Sema3A and suppresses the transcription of PD-L1, collaboratively impeding the formation of blood vessels in PCa and tumor growth.352 Wang and colleagues demonstrated that the concurrent use of the PADI inhibitor Cl-Amidine and the AR signaling inhibitor enzalutamide leads to a combined effect, significantly suppressing the proliferation of CRPC cells in vitro and diminishing tumor growth in vivo models. Results from various studies highlight the importance of PADI2 in regulating AR during the advancement of prostate cancer, especially in CRPC, pointing to PADI as a promising therapeutic target for this condition.223 I-BET762, I-BET726, and CPI-203 influence histone cr through the modulation of BRD4 levels, subsequently leading to the suppression of growth, movement and invasive behavior in PCa cell lines.225
It has been demonstrated in studies that neutrophils can induce the cit of histone H3, leading to NET formation in both mouse and human multiple myeloma cells. One research has confirmed that targeting PAD4 with a novel and specific small molecule inhibitor, BMS-P5, can delay the onset of symptoms in mice with multiple myeloma and significantly inhibit tumor progression.353
In studies of multiple sclerosis, abnormal elevation of PAD activity has been observed. To inhibit PAD, researchers developed a non-covalent inhibitor based on an α-amino acid and ethyl isocyanate core structure, where compound 23, containing an imidazole heterocycle, exhibited high selectivity and significant potency against PAD2. In animal models, compound 23 effectively reversed the physical disability induced by experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis and reduced T-cell infiltration in the brain. This suggests that compound 23 and its analogs hold promise for further development as potential therapeutics for the treatment of multiple sclerosis.354
Research indicates the roles of NETs and PAD in a model of endotoxin shock. The study utilized the PAD inhibitor YW3-56, which was found to effectively prolong the survival of mice induced with lipopolysaccharide. The efficacy of the therapeutic intervention on NETs, pro-inflammatory cytokines (including IL-6, TNFα, and IL-1β), and pulmonary damage was evaluated through ELISA and immunostaining methods. Findings from the study revealed that YW3-56 attenuated the inflammatory injury instigated by LPS. This attenuation was marked by the suppression of NET formation, a decrease in inflammatory cytokine levels, and a reduction in lung tissue injury, indicating its potential as a therapeutic agent. This suggests that inhibiting NET formation may serve as a novel strategy in treating endotoxin shock and related inflammation.355
HDAC inhibitors
HDAC inhibitors are classified into four primary structural groups: hydroxamic acids, cyclic peptides, short-chain fatty acids, and benzamides. This categorization is predicated on the distinctive chemical structures that dictate the inhibitors’ interaction with HDAC enzymes, guiding their use and specificity in epigenetic therapies.356,357 The impact of these HDAC inhibitors on HDACs and their encoding genes has been investigated in animal models of MDD, indicating their antidepressant effects. Trichostatin A (TSA) is capable of reversing hippocampal transcriptome alterations in rats induced by maternal care during early life.358 Vorinostat, recognized in the scientific community as SAHA, holds the distinction of being the inaugural HDAC inhibitor sanctioned by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for clinical application. Research into Vorinostat has unveiled its capability to ameliorate behaviors associated with MDD and to restore the expression of Glial Cell Line-Derived Neurotrophic Factor (GDNF) in mice subjected to Chronic Unpredictable Mild Stress, underscoring its potential for therapeutic intervention in neuropsychiatric disorders.359,360 Valproic acid (VPA) has been found to influence the expression of BDNF, GSK-3β, CORT, and MC4R, and exhibits antidepressant properties.361,362,363 MS-275, as a selective inhibitor targeting Class I HDACs, affects the expression of CREB, BDNF, CORT, RAC1 and GJA5.364 Although HDAC inhibitors have demonstrated antidepressant properties in animal models, there remain limitations to be addressed before their widespread clinical application, including the potential inhibitory effects on the ac of non-histone proteins such as alpha-tubulin, HIF-1 alpha, Stat3, and beta-catenin.365,366,367,368 For instance, Farydak, an HDAC inhibitor approved by the FDA for the treatment of multiple myeloma, has exhibited severe side effects such as gastrointestinal toxicity, thrombocytopenia, bone marrow suppression, fatal cardiac ischemic events, arrhythmias, electrocardiogram alterations, local and systemic infections, as well as hepatic dysfunction.369 Studies have shown that combining HDAC inhibitors with common antidepressants such as fluoxetine can significantly reduce MDD-related behaviors, suggesting that HDAC inhibitors may have potential for use in conjunction with conventional antidepressants in the future treatment of MDD. Lithium has been found to decrease the expression of HDAC1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, and 10.370,371 Olanzapine enhanced the ac of histone H3 at the promoter regions of BDNF in the hippocampal area of rats with MDD, while concurrently inhibiting HDAC5.372 Combined treatment with lithium and valproic acid has been shown to induce BDNF expression and exhibit neuroprotective effects in MDD.373,374
Effective compounds found in Xiao Yao San, such as quercetin, rutin, saikosaponin D, ferulic acid, and curcumin, have been identified through high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC).375 These compounds have shown potential in modulating histone modifications and treating depression, as seen in quercetin’s ability to regulate HDAC and HAT activities, ameliorate cognitive deficits, and enhance the expression of neural plasticity markers.376 The realm of histone modification extends beyond the treatment of MDD and is being explored as a therapeutic target for an array of neurological conditions such as PD, AD, HD, and SMA. For instance, HDAC inhibitors like TSA, SAHA, VPA, and sodium butyrate have demonstrated efficacy in rodent models of Parkinson’s Disease. These inhibitors elevate the expression of neurotrophic factors, including GDNF and BDNF, safeguard dopaminergic neurons, and enhance dopamine synthesis, thereby manifesting their potential in neuroprotective strategies.377,378,379,380 The neurotoxicity of α-synuclein can also be mitigated by HDAC inhibitors, thereby ameliorating the symptoms of Parkinson’s Disease.381 Levodopa, a medication commonly used for PD, has been found to reduce the ac of histone H4.382 VPA can inhibit beta-amyloid, a peptide highly associated with AD.383,384 HDAC inhibitors such as tubastatin A and ACY-1215 have been found to reduce the hyperphosphorylation of tau protein in AD.385 Donepezil, a common medication used in the treatment of AD, has been discovered to inhibit the binding between HDAC6 and the BDNF promoter in the cortex, thereby resulting in the overexpression of BDNF.386 HDAC inhibitors, including TSA, SAHA, sodium butyrate, RGFP966, and LBH589, have been shown to ameliorate symptoms in mouse models of HD.387,388,389,390 In models of Spinal SMA, a variety of HDAC inhibitors have been found to induce the expression of the survival motor neuron 1 gene, which is crucial for the disease.391,392,393,394,395,396
Although HDAC inhibitors have demonstrated neuroprotective effects in animal models, their clinical application still faces challenges, such as their potential for severe side effects and the ability to penetrate the blood-brain barrier. HDAC inhibitors have been approved by the United States FDA for clinical trials in cancer treatment, but human clinical trials for depression have not yet been conducted.
Therapeutic strategies for lung cancer are closely linked with changes in histone la and cr. This finding suggests a potential new approach to improve PEM sensitivity. Proteomic studies of histones have uncovered the pivotal role of the HDAC1 in deacetylation complex in the deacetylation of lysine cr at the H3K18cr site on histone 3. One research has notably observed that HDAC1 inhibition diminishes both the presence of H3K18cr histone and RNA polymerase II at the caspase-1 promoter in cellular environments. Moreover, reducing HDAC1 levels is found to significantly decrease the growth rate of NSCLC cells resistant to PEM. These insights suggest that HDAC1, when crotonylated and associated with caspase-1, could play a role in influencing PEM resistance by specifically acting on GSDMD.397
Glioma histone deacetylase inhibitors are recognized for their anti-tumor properties. These elements have been noted to initiate multiple types of histone post-translational modifications in glioma cells, notably including acetylation and bu. This suggests a profound connection between their antitumor efficacy and the processes of histone acetylation and bu. Assessing the levels of histone bu and pr in cancer cells can provide indirect insights into the pharmacological actions of HDAC inhibitors.398
Studies have indicated that the HDAC inhibitor, SAHA, originally used for treating cutaneous T-cell lymphoma, also shows substantial effectiveness against neuroblastoma. Through detailed quantitative proteomic assessments, a significant induction of histone bu and acetylation was observed following SAHA treatment. This highlights the crucial role of HPTMs in its anti-tumor activity and encourages the exploration of novel anti-tumor drugs that target histone bu as a primary mechanism.399
Others
The findings of the study suggest that the primary mechanism of the anti-cancer properties of various drugs lies in their ability to target histone succ levels and the enzymes associated with the succ process. For example, the ability of aspirin to limit tumor proliferation is associated with its capacity to reduce the succ level of PGAM1. This action effectively impedes the proliferation of liver cancer cells and disrupts the glycolytic pathway.188 One research indicates that suppressing the expression of succinyltransferases, such as KAT2A, reduces tumor cell proliferation and overall tumor growth.126 This suggests a promising approach for utilizing histone succ in tumor therapies. Furthermore, it has been observed that aspirin inhibits glycolysis and increases the efficacy in cancer cells by reducing the total bib of ENO1.400
Resistance to temozolomide (TMZ) remains a significant obstacle in the treatment of GBM.401 The clinically approved antiepileptic drug stiripentol can cross the blood-brain barrier and inhibit the activity of lactate dehydrogenase A/B (LDHA/B), acting as a la inhibitor and rendering GBM cells more sensitive to TMZ both in vitro and in vivo.179 Furthermore, an increase in mitochondrial reactive oxygen species (mROS) and glycolysis has been identified in pulmonary hypertension.402 Investigations have uncovered that hypoxia-driven mitochondrial mROS hinder the hydroxylation process of HIF-1α. This obstruction fosters a glycolytic shift within Pulmonary Artery Smooth Muscle Cells (PASMCs) by the activated HIF-1α/PDK1&PDK2/phosphorylated-PDH-E1α pathway, leading to an escalated build-up of lactate and histone la. Such an increase in histone la at loci of HIF-1α target genes, which include Bmp5, Trpc5, and Kit, is linked to the promotion of PASMC proliferation. Diminishing Pdk1&2 levels tempers lactate concentration, histone la markers, and the proliferation of PASMCs. Additionally, pharmacological intervention with lactate dehydrogenase inhibitors has been shown to curtail histone la and mitigate PASMC proliferation and vascular remodeling in rats with hypoxic Pulmonary Hypertension.403 The combined use of histone la and macroautophagy/autophagy inhibitors with bevacizumab therapy has demonstrated significant therapeutic efficacy in preclinical models of patients resistant to bevacizumab.404
Inhibitors indirectly interfering with the process of novel HPTMs
Research indicates that the expression of hexokinase 2 (HK2) plays a pivotal role in activating hepatic stellate cells through lactylation-mediated histone regulation of gene expression. Targeting HK2 can inhibit the activation of hematopoietic stem cells and reduce liver fibrosis systemically, showcasing the potential of HK2 as an effective therapeutic target for liver fibrosis.405
Research reveals that lactate influences the treatment and prognosis of CRC by inhibiting RARγ, primarily by remodeling the functionality of macrophages within the tumor microenvironment. Additionally, the study identifies nordihydroguaiaretic acid (NDGA) as an effective therapeutic agent that directly binds to RARγ and inhibits the TRAF6-IL-6-STAT3 signaling pathway, offering a new therapeutic strategy targeting pro-tumoral macrophages in CRC.406 In another study, researchers conducted a global mapping of HPTMs in CRC cells treated with largazole-7. They noted that the drug’s selectivity for cancer cells was more than 100 times greater than that for normal cells. Changes in lysine methylation and bu were observed at 68 core histone sites following drug exposure, suggesting that largazole-7 could counteract lysine bu.407 This finding suggests that the anti-tumor efficacy and high specificity of largazole-7 may be attributed to its targeted action against histone bu in CRC cells. Additionally, it has been demonstrated that the cancer treatment delivery ligand, GnRH-III, shows enhanced tumor-inhibitory effects and higher binding affinity when combined with bu.408,409 Moreover, precise rectification of irregular histone la markedly restrains both the development and spread of ccRCC in live models. Even more crucial is the finding that simultaneously targeting histone la and PDGFRβ greatly amplifies the treatment effectiveness. This research underscores the vital importance of HPTMs, particularly histone la, in the advancement of ccRCC, indicating that interrupting the reinforcing cycle between histone la and PDGFRβ signaling may provide an innovative approach to treating ccRCC patients.209
Pan et al. identified a unique triterpene anti-tumor compound, DML and demonstrated its efficacy in inhibiting HCC progression by targeting two tumor-promoting HPTMs sites: H3K9la and H3K56la. The in vivo mechanism of DML in regulating H3 la was confirmed through a tumor xenograft model in nude mice, highlighting DML’s potential as a promising candidate for HCC treatment.410 Additionally, A link between la of H3 histone and the anticancer properties of RJA has been demonstrated in studies. Their research revealed that RJA impedes the progression of HCC by disrupting lactate generation and blocking la at the histone sites H3K9la and H3K14la.411
It has been discovered that glioblastoma stem cells contribute to the accumulation of crotonyl-CoA and the cr of histone H4 lysine by regulating the mechanism of lysine catabolism. Furthermore, experimental evidence has shown that inhibiting histone lysine cr can effectively suppress tumor progression.412
Andrographolide (AGP) can significantly reduce aortic valve calcification by inhibiting the p300 enzyme’s la of histones, particularly at the H3K9 and H3K18 sites. This la is associated with the expression of Runx2, a key factor influencing bone metabolism and calcification. By inhibiting these la sites, AGP diminishes Runx2 expression, thereby mitigating calcification.413
Common techniques and recent advances in Hptms research
In the domain of epigenetics research, a plethora of sophisticated technologies have been developed to study the epigenomic states of genomes and their underlying molecular mechanisms. ChIP-seq is utilized to investigate protein-DNA interactions and histone modifications across entire genomes.414,415 DNase-seq and ATAC-seq assess chromatin accessibility, with the latter being particularly suited for samples with a low cell count.416,417 FAIRE-Seq418 and MNase-seq419 are employed to identify open chromatin regions and map nucleosome positions. High-throughput sequencing strategies such as BS-Seq,420 oxBS-Seq,421 fCAB-Seq,422 and CAB-Seq423 have been formulated to explore DNA and RNA modifications. Novel techniques like CUT&Tag and CUT&RUN leverage antibodies to provide high-resolution and cost-effective solutions for analyzing transcription factors, histone modifications, and protein-DNA interactions.424,425,426 Each technique comes with its own set of strengths and limitations, and often a combination of multiple methods is required. With growing demands, it becomes especially critical to develop more streamlined and practical technologies for the future (Fig. 9).
Next-generation sequencing technology (NGS)
NGS technologies has greatly expanded the methodologies available for protein research, particularly through the integration of ChIP with sequencing known as ChIP-Seq, enabling scientists to comprehensively map epigenetic marks across the entire genome.427,428 This is particularly significant for the prognosis of diseases and the development of therapies. Since its first application by Barski and colleagues in 2007, ChIP-Seq has become a pivotal tool for studying epigenetic modifications due to its cost-effectiveness, efficiency, high sensitivity, and extensive genomic coverage.429
In 2017, the Henikoff laboratory introduced CUT&RUN, a technique that addresses issues of high false-positive rates and poor antibody specificity seen in traditional ChIP-seq. Its advantages include applicability to small cell samples, high signal-to-noise ratio, low cell requirements, and the ability to detect distal transcription factor binding within three-dimensional space.426,430 The CUT&Tag technology, introduced in 2019, precisely identifies and characterizes characteristic peaks of histone modifications through methods such as GoPeaks, suitable for genome-wide analysis, and can be combined with single-cell library construction techniques for high-resolution measurements, yielding high-quality single-cell chromatin modification data.425,431 The CUT&Tag-BS method enables simultaneous detection of histone modifications and DNA methylation, particularly fitting for limited sample volumes.432
Advancements in single-cell sequencing technologies have led to the development of ACT-seq, which allows for the analysis of histone tail modifications in minute quantities, including single cells, and enables the construction of thousands of single-cell libraries within a single day.433 Moreover, Yang and colleagues have developed the scChIX-seq technique, which combines experimental and computational methods to concurrently analyze multiple histone marks within individual cells. This approach supports multimodal analysis of antibody-mediated chromatin studies, endowing scChIX-seq with extensive potential applications in epigenetic research434 (Table 3).
Third-generation sequencing (TGS)
TGS, also known as single-molecule sequencing, operates by allowing a single DNA strand to pass through a nanopore, with the sequence of bases identified using fluorescence or electrical blockade. TGS addresses some limitations of second-generation sequencing, particularly overcoming issues of limited read length in NGS, by enabling continuous sequencing of hundreds of thousands of bases. TGS is versatile, applicable not only to DNA and RNA sequencing but also to direct observation of epigenetic patterns on proteins and genetic material.435 Furthermore, TGS offers distinct advantages over NGS in handling complex DNA scenarios, thus facilitating more in-depth research into histone epigenetic modifications.436 For instance, TGS has been identified as a unique tool for investigating HPV sequences.437
In 2014, Oxford Nanopore Technologies introduced the MiniON, the first commercially available nanopore sequencer.438 Despite challenges like limited continuity and higher error rates in base calling, nanopore technology’s potential has been widely recognized.439 The main TGS platforms are Pacific Biosciences and Oxford Nanopore Technologies, each offering unique solutions. Nanopore technology pairs each nanopore with a nucleic acid cleavage enzyme, whereas Pacific Biosciences achieves sequencing by introducing fluorescently labeled bases alongside the target sequence, using DNA polymerase. The introduction of these platforms has significantly propelled the advancement of TGS technology.440,441
Moreover, novel methodologies based on nanopore technology such as nanoHiMe-seq442 and SMOOTH-seq443 have been developed, which can be utilized to explore the intricate interactions of epigenetic modifications within the genome or to identify structural variants and extrachromosomal circular DNA within single cells. The base accuracy rate of Third-Generation Sequencing is currently around 90%, and it also confronts the challenge of extracting large macromolecules, high-molecular-weight DNA, and intact RNA from clinical samples.444
Mass spectrometry (MS)
MS is a precise analytical tool that measures the mass-to-charge ratio (m/z) of ionized molecules to accurately determine their molecular weight.445,446 MS has emerged as the method of choice for the identification and quantification of HPTMs due to its objectivity, comprehensiveness, and precise quantification.447 Compared to traditional antibody-based methods, mass spectrometry boasts the advantage of detecting any type of HPTM in a single experiment without prior knowledge of the modification type or location. Additionally, mass spectrometry can accurately quantify HPTMs, addressing issues such as cross-reactivity and epitope masking associated with antibody methods.448
Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) has become an integral advancement in MS-based targeted proteomics, offering high sensitivity and precision in protein analysis, and excelling particularly in the large-scale quantitative analysis of proteins and their post-translational modifications. These technologies play a crucial role in identifying and validating cancer biomarkers, facilitating early diagnosis, unraveling molecular mechanisms, and guiding therapeutic strategies.449,450,451 Through LC/MS, researchers can analyze histone HPTM patterns in normal and tumor tissues, such as the observed decrease in H3K27me3 and an increase in H3K9me and H3K36me1/me2 in aggressive triple-negative breast cancer.452,453
Despite its widespread application, LC/MS’s limitation lies in the loss of spatial information. In contrast, Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Mass Spectrometry Imaging (MALDI-MS Imaging) showcases unique advantages in the analysis of histone variants and HPTMs, especially in providing spatial information.454 By directly applying MALDI matrix onto tissue samples and using laser scanning, this technique generates a mass spectrum for each measurement point, offering spatial distribution information akin to immunohistochemistry while simultaneously analyzing multiple peptides. MALDI Imaging has been successfully applied to identify regulated histone HPTMs/variants in various disease states, such as the increase of H4K16 acetylation and K20 dimethylation in hepatocellular carcinoma.455,456 To overcome challenges associated with MALDI Imaging, such as analysis resolution and protein quantification issues, this technique is often coupled with LC/MS, providing new avenues for histone-based disease research and the identification of epigenetic markers.
While bottom-up mass spectrometry methods are popular for their high throughput and efficiency, they often sacrifice information pertaining to combinatorial HPTMs patterns and variant differences. In contrast, middle-down and top-down approaches can provide richer information but face challenges in the clinical application such as data analysis complexity and interpretation. These methods require specific instrument setups, are analytically complex, and demand larger amounts of starting material, which limits their widespread application in clinical settings.456 Recently introduced direct infusion mass spectrometry techniques, which forgo traditional HPLC separation, can analyze 200 HPTMs within one minute, addressing reproducibility issues associated with nanoHPLC separations and demonstrating the potential to process up to 1000 samples per day.457 This offers hope for their application in clinical samples, though the suitability of these technologies will require further validation. However, their integration with targeted MRM acquisition workflows promises to be an ideal choice for clinical sample processing.458
Additionally, an array of pre-mass spectrometry techniques such as Trapped Ion Mobility Spectrometry (TIMS),459 Ion Mobility Spectrometry (IMS),460 and various fragmentation methods (such as CID, beam-type CID, ETD, and UVPD461) have significantly advanced the study of HPTMs. These technologies, by enhancing the selectivity and sensitivity of analysis, have bolstered the capacity to identify and quantify protein modifications in complex biological samples. Advances in high-resolution mass spectrometry technologies, such as Orbitrap462 and FTICR,463 are crucial for identifying subtle mass differences in molecules, especially in the study of HPTMs. These technologies provide precise mass measurements, aiding in a deeper understanding of the roles proteins play in cellular functions and disease progression.
Others
BioID technology is an effective and widely used method for proximity-dependent labeling of proteins in eukaryotic cells. This technique is designed to screen for interacting and proximal proteins within their natural cellular environment, and it has also been utilized in histone research.464 Additionally, technologies like BioID can complement traditional affinity purification mass spectrometry (AP-MS) methods.465 Recently, the development of in vitro BioID (ivBioID) has enabled scientists to depict the microenvironment of the histone H3 variant CENP-A with higher temporal and spatial resolution.466 The future joint application of ivBioID and MS is also worth looking forward to. This advancement provides new perspectives and tools for studying protein interactions and cellular functions.
Conclusion and perspective
In summary, this review encapsulates the historical progress of histone modifications, their basic structures, enzymes involved, and biological functions, while also emphasizing the significant contributions of nine novel histone modifications in advancing the treatment of various diseases, particularly cancer. The review emphasizes the impact of novel histone modifications on diseases treatment, particularly through metabolic pathways, their potential in overcoming drug resistance, and their synergistic effects with other treatments. Furthermore, we also discuss the importance of advanced techniques in histone research, which are crucial for comprehending the cancer physiology. The summary of the relationship between histone modifications and diseases has enriched our understanding of diseases and led to the development of targeted inhibitors. These advancements not only hold promise for refining current diseases therapeutic strategies but also open avenues for more personalized and effective approaches to diseases management in the foreseeable future.
Although numerous researches have highlighted the importance and therapeutic potential of HPTMs in various diseases, the specific roles and mechanisms of HPTMs in the development and treatment of cancers remain largely unclear. Furthermore, the landscape of epigenetic regulation becomes even more complex when considering competitive or antagonistic interactions that may arise as different modification pathways converge on the same amino acid residue.4 For instance, there is a balance between the ac and ma of histone H3 at lysine 9,467 as well as a dynamic competition between ac and bu at lysines 5 and 8 of histone H4.468 Additionally, within the field of epigenetics in cancer therapy, the roles of “writers”, “erasers” and “readers” present challenges, especially in terms of their specificity to individual HPTMs. These proteins exhibit affinity for a broad range of HPTMs, which could lead to a variety of side effects. The interaction between histone modifications and other forms of epigenetic alterations, like DNA ma, requires additional exploration.469
Over the past few decades, significant progress has been made in the research of various histone inhibitors. However, the research remains unbalanced, and the clinical potential has not been fully exploited. Developing highly efficient, selective inhibitors of histone modifications is a vital need for future research. Dual inhibitors, such as tyrosine kinase and HDAC inhibitors,470,471 VEGFR-2/HDAC inhibitors,472 and FGFR/HDAC inhibitors,473,474 hold immense application potential in cancer therapy. Moreover, several novel dual inhibitors have entered clinical trial phases, demonstrating feasibility and efficacy in the treatment of solid tumors.475 The roles of novel HPTMs in other diseases remain worthy of investigation. For instance, emerging HPTMs continue to have a distinctive impact on processes like embryonic development; however, research into the connection between histone modifications and their developmental implications or therapeutic studies remains scant. Moreover, many traditional HPTMs are crucial regulatory factors of cellular functions. The interplay or competitive mechanisms between them and novel HPTMs and their roles in diseases require further investigation. In addition, research on the “readers” of various novel HPTMs remains a blank slate. Given the ubiquity of various acylation modifications, there must exist more types and functions of “writers,” “erasers,” and “readers” in novel HPTMs, represented by la, thus warranting further exploration. This will provide new ideas and targets for improving cancer treatment outcomes and tumor prognosis. There is an anticipation that more research in the future will delve into these diseases, providing a deeper understanding of these epigenetic influences. With the continuous advancement of novel analytical techniques, it is anticipated that more types of histone modifications and new target inhibitors will be discovered, as well as hybrids that not only possess multi-target effects but also significantly enhance therapeutic efficacy in vivo. This holds tremendous potential for the future treatment of various diseases, particularly cancer.
References
Huang, H. et al. SnapShot: Histone modifications. Cell 159, 458–458.e451 (2014).
Recillas-Targa, F. Cancer epigenetics: An overview. Arch. Med. Res. 53, 732–740 (2022).
Hanover, J. A., Krause, M. W. & Love, D. C. Bittersweet memories: Linking metabolism to epigenetics through O-GlcNAcylation. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 13, 312–321 (2012).
Bannister, A. J. & Kouzarides, T. Regulation of chromatin by histone modifications. Cell Res. 21, 381–395 (2011).
Kouzarides, T. Chromatin modifications and their function. Cell 128, 693–705 (2007).
Chen, Y. et al. Lysine propionylation and butyrylation are novel post-translational modifications in histones. Mol. Cell Proteom. 6, 812–819 (2007).
Tan, M. et al. Identification of 67 histone marks and histone lysine crotonylation as a new type of histone modification. Cell 146, 1016–1028 (2011).
Dai, L. et al. Lysine 2-hydroxyisobutyrylation is a widely distributed active histone mark. Nat. Chem. Biol. 10, 365–370 (2014).
Xie, Z. et al. Lysine succinylation and lysine malonylation in histones. Mol. Cell Proteom. 11, 100–107 (2012).
Rousseaux, S. & Khochbin, S. Histone acylation beyond acetylation: Terra incognita in chromatin biology. Cell J. 17, 1–6 (2015).
Benayoun, B. A. et al. Remodeling of epigenome and transcriptome landscapes with aging in mice reveals widespread induction of inflammatory responses. Genome Res 29, 697–709 (2019).
Zhang, K. et al. Comparative analysis of histone H3 and H4 post-translational modifications of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma with different invasive capabilities. J. Proteom. 112, 180–189 (2015).
Shi, Y. et al. Epigenetic regulation in cardiovascular disease: mechanisms and advances in clinical trials. Signal Transduct. Target Ther. 7, 200 (2022).
Ruiz-Andres, O. et al. Histone lysine crotonylation during acute kidney injury in mice. Dis. Model Mech. 9, 633–645 (2016).
Nie, L. et al. The landscape of histone modifications in a high-fat diet-induced obese (DIO) mouse model. Mol. Cell Proteom. 16, 1324–1334 (2017).
Liu, Y. et al. Chromodomain Y-like protein-mediated histone crotonylation regulates stress-induced depressive behaviors. Biol. Psychiatry 85, 635–649 (2019).
Du, Y. et al. Lysine malonylation is elevated in type 2 diabetic mouse models and enriched in metabolic associated proteins. Mol. Cell Proteom. 14, 227–236 (2015).
Zhao, A. et al. Epigenetic regulation in hematopoiesis and its implications in the targeted therapy of hematologic malignancies. Signal Transduct. Target Ther. 8, 71 (2023).
Wang, N., Ma, T. & Yu, B. Targeting epigenetic regulators to overcome drug resistance in cancers. Signal Transduct. Target Ther. 8, 69 (2023).
Xu, H. et al. Function and mechanism of novel histone posttranslational modifications in health and disease. Biomed. Res Int 2021, 6635225 (2021).
Zhang, D. et al. Metabolic regulation of gene expression by histone lactylation. Nature 574, 575–580 (2019).
Baumann, K. Post-translational modifications: Crotonylation versus acetylation. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 16, 265 (2015).
Xie, Z. et al. Metabolic regulation of gene expression by histone lysine β-hydroxybutyrylation. Mol. Cell 62, 194–206 (2016).
Waddington, C. H. The epigenotype. 1942. Int J. Epidemiol. 41, 10–13 (2012).
Nanney, D. L. Epigenetic control systems. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 44, 712–717 (1958).
Riggs, A. D. X inactivation, differentiation, and DNA methylation. Cytogenet Cell Genet 14, 9–25 (1975).
Holliday, R. Epigenetics: An overview. Dev. Genet 15, 453–457, (1994).
Holliday, R. & Pugh, J. E. DNA modification mechanisms and gene activity during development. Science 187, 226–232, (1975).
Bird, A. Perceptions of epigenetics. Nature 447, 396–398 (2007).
Peixoto, P., Cartron, P. F., Serandour, A. A. & Hervouet, E. From 1957 to nowadays: A brief history of epigenetics. Int J. Mol. Sci. 21, 7571 (2020).
Nicoglou, A. & Merlin, F. Epigenetics: A way to bridge the gap between biological fields. Stud. Hist. Philos. Biol. Biomed. Sci. 66, 73–82 (2017).
Wu, Y. L. et al. Epigenetic regulation in metabolic diseases: mechanisms and advances in clinical study. Signal Transduct. Target Ther. 8, 98 (2023).
Allfrey, V. G., Faulkner, R. & Mirsky, A. E. Acetylation and methylation of histones and their possible role in the regulation of RNA synthesis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 51, 786–794 (1964).
Kornberg, R. D. Chromatin structure: A repeating unit of histones and DNA. Science 184, 868–871, (1974).
Brannan, C. I., Dees, E. C., Ingram, R. S. & Tilghman, S. M. The product of the H19 gene may function as an RNA. Mol. Cell Biol. 10, 28–36 (1990).
Lee, R. C., Feinbaum, R. L., Ambros, V. & The, C. elegans heterochronic gene lin-4 encodes small RNAs with antisense complementarity to lin-14. Cell 75, 843–854 (1993).
Brownell, J. E. et al. Tetrahymena histone acetyltransferase A: A homolog to yeast Gcn5p linking histone acetylation to gene activation. Cell 84, 843–851 (1996).
Taunton, J., Hassig, C. A. & Schreiber, S. L. A mammalian histone deacetylase related to the yeast transcriptional regulator Rpd3p. Science 272, 408–411 (1996).
Luger, K. et al. Crystal structure of the nucleosome core particle at 2.8 A resolution. Nature 389, 251–260 (1997).
Rea, S. et al. Regulation of chromatin structure by site-specific histone H3 methyltransferases. Nature 406, 593–599 (2000).
Wu, G. et al. Somatic histone H3 alterations in pediatric diffuse intrinsic pontine gliomas and non-brainstem glioblastomas. Nat. Genet 44, 251–253 (2012).
Schwartzentruber, J. et al. Driver mutations in histone H3.3 and chromatin remodelling genes in paediatric glioblastoma. Nature 482, 226–231 (2012).
Kundaje, A. et al. Integrative analysis of 111 reference human epigenomes. Nature 518, 317–330 (2015).
Grunstein, M. Histones as regulators of genes. Sci. Am. 267, 68–74b (1992).
Turner, B. M. Histone acetylation and an epigenetic code. Bioessays 22, 836–845 (2000).
Zaib, S., Rana, N. & Khan, I. Histone modifications and their role in epigenetics of cancer. Curr. Med Chem. 29, 2399–2411 (2022).
Shiio, Y. & Eisenman, R. N. Histone sumoylation is associated with transcriptional repression. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100, 13225–13230, (2003).
Du, J. et al. Sirt5 is a NAD-dependent protein lysine demalonylase and desuccinylase. Science 334, 806–809 (2011).
Cavalli, G. & Heard, E. Advances in epigenetics link genetics to the environment and disease. Nature 571, 489–499 (2019).
Lennartsson, A. & Ekwall, K. Histone modification patterns and epigenetic codes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1790, 863–868 (2009).
Li, X. & Li, X. D. Integrative chemical biology approaches to deciphering the histone code: A problem-driven journey. Acc. Chem. Res 54, 3734–3747 (2021).
Cutter, A. R. & Hayes, J. J. A brief review of nucleosome structure. FEBS Lett. 589, 2914–2922 (2015).
Joseph, F. M. & Young, N. L. Histone variant-specific post-translational modifications. Semin Cell Dev. Biol. 135, 73–84 (2023).
Lorch, Y., Kornberg, R. D. & Maier-Davis, B. Role of the histone tails in histone octamer transfer. Nucleic Acids Res. 51, 3671–3678 (2023).
Li, G., Levitus, M., Bustamante, C. & Widom, J. Rapid spontaneous accessibility of nucleosomal DNA. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 12, 46–53 (2005).
Cosgrove, M. S., Boeke, J. D. & Wolberger, C. Regulated nucleosome mobility and the histone code. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 11, 1037–1043 (2004).
North, J. A. et al. Phosphorylation of histone H3(T118) alters nucleosome dynamics and remodeling. Nucleic Acids Res. 39, 6465–6474 (2011).
Bao, X. et al. Glutarylation of histone H4 lysine 91 regulates chromatin dynamics. Mol. Cell 76, 660–675.e669 (2019).
Zhang, L., Eugeni, E. E., Parthun, M. R. & Freitas, M. A. Identification of novel histone post-translational modifications by peptide mass fingerprinting. Chromosoma 112, 77–86 (2003).
Valls, E., Sánchez-Molina, S. & Martínez-Balbás, M. A. Role of histone modifications in marking and activating genes through mitosis. J. Biol. Chem. 280, 42592–42600 (2005).
Xin, L. et al. Exploring cellular memory molecules marking competent and active transcriptions. BMC Mol. Biol. 8, 31 (2007).
Ali, I., Conrad, R. J., Verdin, E. & Ott, M. Lysine acetylation goes global: From epigenetics to metabolism and therapeutics. Chem. Rev. 118, 1216–1252 (2018).
Dahlin, J. L., Chen, X., Walters, M. A. & Zhang, Z. Histone-modifying enzymes, histone modifications and histone chaperones in nucleosome assembly: Lessons learned from Rtt109 histone acetyltransferases. Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 50, 31–53 (2015).
Shibata, S. Chromatin dynamics and epigenetics in skin stress adaptation. J. Dermatol Sci. 103, 66–72 (2021).
Liu, B. et al. Identification and characterization of propionylation at histone H3 lysine 23 in mammalian cells. J. Biol. Chem. 284, 32288–32295 (2009).
Kaczmarska, Z. et al. Structure of p300 in complex with acyl-CoA variants. Nat. Chem. Biol. 13, 21–29 (2017).
Han, Z. et al. Revealing the protein propionylation activity of the histone acetyltransferase MOF (males absent on the first). J. Biol. Chem. 293, 3410–3420 (2018).
Peng, C. et al. The first identification of lysine malonylation substrates and its regulatory enzyme. Mol. Cell Proteom. 10, M111.012658 (2011).
Sabari, B. R., Zhang, D., Allis, C. D. & Zhao, Y. Metabolic regulation of gene expression through histone acylations. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 18, 90–101 (2017).
Zhao, D. et al. YEATS domain-A histone acylation reader in health and disease. J. Mol. Biol. 429, 1994–2002 (2017).
Bao, X. et al. Identification of ‘erasers’ for lysine crotonylated histone marks using a chemical proteomics approach. Elife 3, e02999 (2014).
Zhao, S., Zhang, X. & Li, H. Beyond histone acetylation-writing and erasing histone acylations. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 53, 169–177 (2018).
Xie, Y. et al. The role and mechanism of histone lactylation in health and diseases. Front Genet 13, 949252 (2022).
Vaupel, P. & Multhoff, G. Revisiting the Warburg effect: historical dogma versus current understanding. J. Physiol. 599, 1745–1757 (2021).
Chen, L. et al. Lactate-lactylation hands between metabolic reprogramming and immunosuppression. Int J. Mol. Sci. 23, 11943 (2022).
Vander Heiden, M. G., Cantley, L. C. & Thompson, C. B. Understanding the Warburg effect: The metabolic requirements of cell proliferation. Science 324, 1029–1033, (2009).
Liberti, M. V. & Locasale, J. W. Histone lactylation: A new role for glucose metabolism. Trends Biochem Sci. 45, 179–182 (2020).
Cluntun, A. A. et al. The rate of glycolysis quantitatively mediates specific histone acetylation sites. Cancer Metab. 3, 10 (2015).
Wu, J. et al. Stromal-epithelial lactate shuttle induced by tumor-derived interleukin-1β promotes cell proliferation in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Int J. Mol. Med 41, 687–696 (2018).
Doherty, J. R. & Cleveland, J. L. Targeting lactate metabolism for cancer therapeutics. J. Clin. Invest 123, 3685–3692 (2013).
Moreno-Yruela, C. et al. Class I histone deacetylases (HDAC1-3) are histone lysine delactylases. Sci. Adv. 8, eabi6696 (2022).
Desgeorges, T. et al. Histone lactylation in macrophages is predictive for gene expression changes during ischemia induced-muscle regeneration. Mol. Metab. 83, 101923 (2024).
Dai, X., Lv, X., Thompson, E. W. & Ostrikov, K. K. Histone lactylation: Epigenetic mark of glycolytic switch. Trends Genet 38, 124–127 (2022).
Rogers, G. E. & Simmonds, D. H. Content of citrulline and other amino-acids in a protein of hair follicles. Nature 182, 186–187 (1958).
van Boekel, M. A., Vossenaar, E. R., van den Hoogen, F. H. & van Venrooij, W. J. Autoantibody systems in rheumatoid arthritis: specificity, sensitivity and diagnostic value. Arthritis Res 4, 87–93 (2002).
Kroot, E. J. et al. The prognostic value of anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody in patients with recent-onset rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 43, 1831–1835 (2000).
Ishida-Yamamoto, A. et al. Decreased deiminated keratin K1 in psoriatic hyperproliferative epidermis. J. Invest Dermatol 114, 701–705 (2000).
Chumanevich, A. A. et al. Suppression of colitis in mice by Cl-amidine: a novel peptidylarginine deiminase inhibitor. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 300, G929–G938 (2011).
Ishigami, A. et al. Abnormal accumulation of citrullinated proteins catalyzed by peptidylarginine deiminase in hippocampal extracts from patients with Alzheimer’s disease. J. Neurosci. Res 80, 120–128 (2005).
Vossenaar, E. R. et al. Expression and activity of citrullinating peptidylarginine deiminase enzymes in monocytes and macrophages. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 63, 373–381 (2004).
Li, P. et al. Coordination of PAD4 and HDAC2 in the regulation of p53-target gene expression. Oncogene 29, 3153–3162 (2010).
Hagiwara, T. et al. Deimination of arginine residues in nucleophosmin/B23 and histones in HL-60 granulocytes. Biochem. Biophys. Res Commun. 290, 979–983 (2002).
Zhang, X. et al. Peptidylarginine deiminase 1-catalyzed histone citrullination is essential for early embryo development. Sci. Rep. 6, 38727 (2016).
Golenberg, N. et al. Citrullination regulates wound responses and tissue regeneration in zebrafish. J. Cell Biol. 219, e201908164 (2020).
Sekeri-Pataryas, K. E. & Sourlingas, T. G. The differentiation-associated linker histone, H1.0, during the in vitro aging and senescence of human diploid fibroblasts. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 1100, 361–367 (2007).
Cherrington, B. D. et al. Potential role for peptidylarginine deiminase 2 (PAD2) in citrullination of canine mammary epithelial cell histones. PLoS One 5, e11768 (2010).
Khan, S. A. et al. GnRH stimulates peptidylarginine deiminase catalyzed histone citrullination in gonadotrope cells. Mol. Endocrinol. 30, 1081–1091 (2016).
Brinkmann, V. et al. Neutrophil extracellular traps kill bacteria. Science 303, 1532–1535 (2004).
Khandpur, R. et al. NETs are a source of citrullinated autoantigens and stimulate inflammatory responses in rheumatoid arthritis. Sci. Transl. Med 5, 178ra140 (2013).
Li, P. et al. PAD4 is essential for antibacterial innate immunity mediated by neutrophil extracellular traps. J. Exp. Med 207, 1853–1862 (2010).
Wu, Z. et al. Inhibition of PAD2 improves survival in a mouse model of lethal LPS-induced endotoxic shock. Inflammation 43, 1436–1445 (2020).
Zuo, Y. et al. Neutrophil extracellular traps in COVID-19. JCI Insight 5, e138999 (2020).
Chang, X. et al. Increased PADI4 expression in blood and tissues of patients with malignant tumors. BMC Cancer 9, 40 (2009).
Zhu, D., Zhang, Y. & Wang, S. Histone citrullination: a new target for tumors. Mol. Cancer 20, 90 (2021).
Berger-Achituv, S. et al. A proposed role for neutrophil extracellular traps in cancer immunoediting. Front Immunol. 4, 48 (2013).
Tohme, S. et al. Neutrophil extracellular traps promote the development and progression of liver metastases after surgical stress. Cancer Res 76, 1367–1380 (2016).
Demers, M. et al. Priming of neutrophils toward NETosis promotes tumor growth. Oncoimmunology 5, e1134073 (2016).
Chen, Y., Chen, W., Cobb, M. H. & Zhao, Y. PTMap–a sequence alignment software for unrestricted, accurate, and full-spectrum identification of post-translational modification sites. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106, 761–766 (2009).
Dai, S. K. et al. Histone crotonylation regulates neural stem cell fate decisions by activating bivalent promoters. EMBO Rep. 22, e52023 (2021).
Liu, K. et al. A qualitative proteome-wide lysine crotonylation profiling of papaya (Carica papaya L.). Sci. Rep. 8, 8230 (2018).
Sabari, B. R. et al. Intracellular crotonyl-CoA stimulates transcription through p300-catalyzed histone crotonylation. Mol. Cell 69, 533 (2018).
Liu, X. et al. MOF as an evolutionarily conserved histone crotonyltransferase and transcriptional activation by histone acetyltransferase-deficient and crotonyltransferase-competent CBP/p300. Cell Discov. 3, 17016 (2017).
Wan, J., Liu, H., Chu, J. & Zhang, H. Functions and mechanisms of lysine crotonylation. J. Cell Mol. Med. 23, 7163–7169 (2019).
Liu, S. et al. Chromodomain protein CDYL acts as a crotonyl-CoA hydratase to regulate histone crotonylation and spermatogenesis. Mol. Cell 67, 853–866.e855 (2017).
Fu, H. et al. Dynamics of telomere rejuvenation during chemical induction to pluripotent stem cells. Stem Cell Rep. 11, 70–87 (2018).
Jiang, G. et al. HIV latency is reversed by ACSS2-driven histone crotonylation. J. Clin. Invest 128, 1190–1198 (2018).
Wan, J. et al. HOXB9 promotes endometrial cancer progression by targeting E2F3. Cell Death Dis. 9, 509 (2018).
Kawai, Y. et al. Formation of Nepsilon-(succinyl)lysine in vivo: a novel marker for docosahexaenoic acid-derived protein modification. J. Lipid Res 47, 1386–1398 (2006).
Zhang, Z. et al. Identification of lysine succinylation as a new post-translational modification. Nat. Chem. Biol. 7, 58–63 (2011).
Li, X. et al. Systematic identification of the lysine succinylation in the protozoan parasite Toxoplasma gondii. J. Proteome Res 13, 6087–6095 (2014).
Tan, M. et al. Lysine glutarylation is a protein posttranslational modification regulated by SIRT5. Cell Metab. 19, 605–617 (2014).
Ye, J. et al. Histone H4 lysine 91 acetylation a core domain modification associated with chromatin assembly. Mol. Cell 18, 123–130 (2005).
Hirschey, M. D. & Zhao, Y. Metabolic regulation by lysine malonylation, succinylation, and glutarylation. Mol. Cell Proteom. 14, 2308–2315, (2015).
Zorro Shahidian, L. et al. Succinylation of H3K122 destabilizes nucleosomes and enhances transcription. EMBO Rep. 22, e51009 (2021).
Yokoyama, A., Katsura, S. & Sugawara, A. Biochemical analysis of histone succinylation. Biochem Res Int 2017, 8529404 (2017).
Wang, Y. et al. KAT2A coupled with the α-KGDH complex acts as a histone H3 succinyltransferase. Nature 552, 273–277 (2017).
Simithy, J. et al. Characterization of histone acylations links chromatin modifications with metabolism. Nat. Commun. 8, 1141 (2017).
Trefely, S., Lovell, C. D., Snyder, N. W. & Wellen, K. E. Compartmentalised acyl-CoA metabolism and roles in chromatin regulation. Mol. Metab. 38, 100941 (2020).
Tong, Y. et al. KAT2A succinyltransferase activity-mediated 14-3-3ζ upregulation promotes β-catenin stabilization-dependent glycolysis and proliferation of pancreatic carcinoma cells. Cancer Lett. 469, 1–10 (2020).
Alleyn, M., Breitzig, M., Lockey, R. & Kolliputi, N. The dawn of succinylation: A posttranslational modification. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 314, C228–c232 (2018).
Nathan, D. et al. Histone sumoylation is a negative regulator in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and shows dynamic interplay with positive-acting histone modifications. Genes Dev. 20, 966–976 (2006).
Dhall, A. et al. Chemically sumoylated histone H4 stimulates intranucleosomal demethylation by the LSD1-CoREST complex. ACS Chem. Biol. 12, 2275–2280 (2017).
Hsu, P. L. et al. Structural basis of H2B ubiquitination-dependent H3K4 methylation by COMPASS. Mol. Cell 76, 712–723.e714 (2019).
Zhang, K., Chen, Y., Zhang, Z. & Zhao, Y. Identification and verification of lysine propionylation and butyrylation in yeast core histones using PTMap software. J. Proteome Res 8, 900–906 (2009).
Kebede, A. F. et al. Histone propionylation is a mark of active chromatin. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 24, 1048–1056 (2017).
Vollmuth, F. & Geyer, M. Interaction of propionylated and butyrylated histone H3 lysine marks with Brd4 bromodomains. Angew. Chem. Int Ed. Engl. 49, 6768–6772, (2010).
Lin, H., Su, X. & He, B. Protein lysine acylation and cysteine succination by intermediates of energy metabolism. ACS Chem. Biol. 7, 947–960, (2012).
Kaelin, W. G. Jr. & McKnight, S. L. Influence of metabolism on epigenetics and disease. Cell 153, 56–69 (2013).
Wellen, K. E. et al. ATP-citrate lyase links cellular metabolism to histone acetylation. Science 324, 1076–1080 (2009).
Guenzel, A. J. et al. Generation of a hypomorphic model of propionic acidemia amenable to gene therapy testing. Mol. Ther. 21, 1316–1323 (2013).
Huang, G. et al. An information entropy-based approach for computationally identifying histone lysine butyrylation. Front Genet 10, 1325 (2019).
Zhu, Z. et al. Identification of lysine isobutyrylation as a new histone modification mark. Nucleic Acids Res. 49, 177–189 (2021).
Maxwell, P. H. et al. The tumour suppressor protein VHL targets hypoxia-inducible factors for oxygen-dependent proteolysis. Nature 399, 271–275 (1999).
Katada, S., Imhof, A. & Sassone-Corsi, P. Connecting threads: epigenetics and metabolism. Cell 148, 24–28, (2012).
Marosi, K. et al. 3-Hydroxybutyrate regulates energy metabolism and induces BDNF expression in cerebral cortical neurons. J. Neurochem 139, 769–781 (2016).
Kashiwaya, Y. et al. D-beta-hydroxybutyrate protects neurons in models of Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 5440–5444 (2000).
Tieu, K. et al. D-beta-hydroxybutyrate rescues mitochondrial respiration and mitigates features of Parkinson disease. J. Clin. Invest 112, 892–901 (2003).
Liu, K. et al. p53 β-hydroxybutyrylation attenuates p53 activity. Cell Death Dis. 10, 243 (2019).
Millán-Zambrano, G., Burton, A., Bannister, A. J. & Schneider, R. Histone post-translational modifications - cause and consequence of genome function. Nat. Rev. Genet 23, 563–580 (2022).
Durrin, L. K., Mann, R. K., Kayne, P. S. & Grunstein, M. Yeast histone H4 N-terminal sequence is required for promoter activation in vivo. Cell 65, 1023–1031, (1991).
Protacio, R. U., Li, G., Lowary, P. T. & Widom, J. Effects of histone tail domains on the rate of transcriptional elongation through a nucleosome. Mol. Cell Biol. 20, 8866–8878, (2000).
Nitsch, S., Zorro Shahidian, L. & Schneider, R. Histone acylations and chromatin dynamics: concepts, challenges, and links to metabolism. EMBO Rep. 22, e52774 (2021).
Sabari, B. R. et al. Intracellular crotonyl-CoA stimulates transcription through p300-catalyzed histone crotonylation. Mol. Cell 58, 203–215 (2015).
Gowans, G. J. et al. Recognition of histone crotonylation by Taf14 links metabolic state to gene expression. Mol. Cell 76, 909–921.e903 (2019).
Tidwell, T., Allfrey, V. G. & Mirsky, A. E. The methylation of histones during regeneration of the liver. J. Biol. Chem. 243, 707–715 (1968).
Bannister, A. J., Schneider, R. & Kouzarides, T. Histone methylation: dynamic or static? Cell 109, 801–806, (2002).
Henikoff, S. & Shilatifard, A. Histone modification: cause or cog? Trends Genet 27, 389–396, (2011).
Talbert, P. B., Meers, M. P. & Henikoff, S. Old cogs, new tricks: the evolution of gene expression in a chromatin context. Nat. Rev. Genet 20, 283–297 (2019).
Vermeulen, M. et al. Selective anchoring of TFIID to nucleosomes by trimethylation of histone H3 lysine 4. Cell 131, 58–69 (2007).
Ng, H. H., Robert, F., Young, R. A. & Struhl, K. Targeted recruitment of Set1 histone methylase by elongating Pol II provides a localized mark and memory of recent transcriptional activity. Mol. Cell 11, 709–719 (2003).
Petruk, S. et al. Trithorax and dCBP acting in a complex to maintain expression of a homeotic gene. Science 294, 1331–1334 (2001).
Hörmanseder, E. et al. H3K4 methylation-dependent memory of somatic cell identity inhibits reprogramming and development of nuclear transfer embryos. Cell Stem Cell 21, 135–143.e136 (2017).
Shimko, J. C. et al. Preparation of fully synthetic histone H3 reveals that acetyl-lysine 56 facilitates protein binding within nucleosomes. J. Mol. Biol. 408, 187–204 (2011).
North, J. A. et al. Regulation of the nucleosome unwrapping rate controls DNA accessibility. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, 10215–10227 (2012).
Tropberger, P. et al. Regulation of transcription through acetylation of H3K122 on the lateral surface of the histone octamer. Cell 152, 859–872 (2013).
Spruce, C. et al. HELLS and PRDM9 form a pioneer complex to open chromatin at meiotic recombination hot spots. Genes Dev. 34, 398–412 (2020).
Zhang, X., Liu, Y. & Wang, N. Multifaceted Roles of Histone Lysine Lactylation in Meiotic Gene Dynamics and Recombination. Preprint at https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.01.25.576681v1 (2024).
Mihola, O. et al. Rat PRDM9 shapes recombination landscapes, duration of meiosis, gametogenesis, and age of fertility. BMC Biol. 19, 86 (2021).
Kaiser, V. B. & Semple, C. A. Chromatin loop anchors are associated with genome instability in cancer and recombination hotspots in the germline. Genome Biol. 19, 101 (2018).
Grey, C. et al. In vivo binding of PRDM9 reveals interactions with noncanonical genomic sites. Genome Res 27, 580–590 (2017).
Liu, C., Zhang, Y., Liu, C. C. & Schatz, D. G. Structural insights into the evolution of the RAG recombinase. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 22, 353–370 (2022).
Hanahan, D. & Weinberg, R. A. The hallmarks of cancer. Cell 100, 57–70 (2000).
Arnould, C. et al. Loop extrusion as a mechanism for formation of DNA damage repair foci. Nature 590, 660–665 (2021).
Thorslund, T. et al. Histone H1 couples initiation and amplification of ubiquitin signalling after DNA damage. Nature 527, 389–393 (2015).
Mattiroli, F. et al. RNF168 ubiquitinates K13-15 on H2A/H2AX to drive DNA damage signaling. Cell 150, 1182–1195 (2012).
Pesavento, J. J., Yang, H., Kelleher, N. L. & Mizzen, C. A. Certain and progressive methylation of histone H4 at lysine 20 during the cell cycle. Mol. Cell Biol. 28, 468–486, (2008).
Gong, F. et al. Histone demethylase KDM5A regulates the ZMYND8-NuRD chromatin remodeler to promote DNA repair. J. Cell Biol. 216, 1959–1974 (2017).
Li, X. et al. Histone demethylase KDM5B is a key regulator of genome stability. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111, 7096–7101 (2014).
Yue, Q. et al. Histone H3K9 lactylation confers temozolomide resistance in glioblastoma via LUC7L2-mediated MLH1 intron retention. Adv. Sci. (Weinh.) 11, e2309290 (2024).
Kuo, A. J. et al. The BAH domain of ORC1 links H4K20me2 to DNA replication licensing and Meier-Gorlin syndrome. Nature 484, 115–119 (2012).
Beck, D. B. et al. The role of PR-Set7 in replication licensing depends on Suv4-20h. Genes Dev. 26, 2580–2589 (2012).
Rondinelli, B. et al. H3K4me3 demethylation by the histone demethylase KDM5C/JARID1C promotes DNA replication origin firing. Nucleic Acids Res 43, 2560–2574 (2015).