Abstract
Variants are globally emerging very quickly following pandemic prototypic SARS-CoV-2. To evaluate the cross-protection of prototypic SARS-CoV-2 vaccine against its variants, we vaccinated rhesus monkeys with three doses of prototypic SARS-CoV-2 inactivated vaccine, followed by challenging with emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern (VOCs). These vaccinated animals produced neutralizing antibodies against Alpha, Beta, Delta, and Omicron variants, although there were certain declinations of geometric mean titer (GMT) as compared with prototypic SARS-CoV-2. Of note, in vivo this prototypic vaccine not only reduced the viral loads in nasal, throat and anal swabs, pulmonary tissues, but also improved the pathological changes in the lung infected by variants of Alpha, Beta, and Delta. In summary, the prototypic SARS-CoV-2 inactivated vaccine in this study protected against VOCs to certain extension, which is of great significance for prevention and control of COVID-19.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
SARS-CoV-2 has caused an unprecedented pandemic in the world history, currently with more than 220 million confirmed cases and almost five million deaths. Everyday there are still new cases reported worldwide. SARS-CoV-2 and its disease COVID-19 affect almost everything in the world, including healthcare, education, tourism, aviation, real estate and housing, sports industry, politics, and country relationships.1 Given with the experience of SARS-CoV, governors and scientists have paid great attentions to SARS-CoV-2 at the beginning of outbreak. According to the chain of infection (the reservoir of infectious agent, route of transmission and susceptible host), quarantine, wearing masks and environmental disinfection are enforced and efficiently controls the first two steps of the infection chain.
However, vaccination for the susceptible host is widely considered to be the last and best way to control SARS-CoV-2. Theoretically, if a group of 70–80% people get vaccinated and resistant to COVID-19, herd immunity can be established to prevent the remaining small population of unvaccinated people from SARS-CoV-2 infection.2 Therefore, vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 have been developing globally via various technical routes, including the traditional inactivated vaccine, recombinant protein vaccine, viral vector vaccine, DNA vaccine, and mRNA vaccine.3,4 Until July 2021, there are 322 candidate vaccines proposed in the world, 99 vaccines in clinical studies, 25 at phase III, and 18 under emergency use authorization.5 At the time of writing, more than 600 million doses of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines have been given in the world (Our World in Data), covering all people at 12 years or older, and pregnant women.6
Vaccination plays critical roles in controlling the transmission of SARS-CoV-2. However, there are some concerns about these rapidly developed and novel vaccines, such as antibody enhancement effect7,8,9 and thrombosis,10,11,12 which are reported to be possibly associated with SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. In particular, SARS-CoV-2 variants are emerging one after another with new characters, including immune escape, more transmission and virulence,13,14,15 which has brought great challenges to vaccine R&D, vaccine users and agency of control and prevention of COVID-19. Nevertheless, vaccine against the prototypic SARS-CoV-2 strain has been still used globally since it is difficult to produce the variant-specific vaccines in such a short time. However, everyone in the world has the same concern about the cross-protection of current vaccines against these emerging variants,16,17 although clinical studies show prototypic vaccines are effective in circulating variants, mainly the reduction of COVID-19 severity and mortality based on the WHO definition of vaccine efficacy (>50%).18 However, for those clinical studies, it is very hard to evaluate and compare the cross-protection of prototypic vaccines among several variants at one time via the same standard. Non-human primate models of COVID-19 are widely and successfully used in research and development of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines.19 Therefore, in this study, we evaluated protection of prototypic SARS-CoV-2 inactivated vaccine against emerging variants of concern (VOCs) in vitro and in vivo to provide guidelines for SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, prevention and control of COVID-19.
Results
Prototypic SARS-CoV-2 inactivated vaccine induces cross-neutralizing antibodies against emerging variants of concern
In order to evaluate effectiveness of prototypic SARS-CoV-2 vaccine against its VOCs, cross-neutralization assay was performed on clinical serum samples from volunteers vaccinated with three doses of prototypic SARS-CoV-2 inactivated vaccine KMS-1 (VacKMS1) against the emerging VOCs, Alpha (B.1.1.7), Beta (B.1.351), Delta (B.1.617.2), and Omicron (B.1.1.592). Strikingly, vaccinated volunteers produced antibodies that could neutralize all tested variants with neutralizing titers up to 2048, although geometric mean titer (GMT) of neutralizing antibody against VOCs were lower, compared with the prototypic SARS-CoV-2 (Fig. 1a). In order to confirm these clinical results, we vaccinated 12 rhesus monkeys with three doses of this inactivated vaccine (Fig. 1b). At 18 days post 3rd vaccination, serum samples were collected for further analysis. Micro-neutralization assay revealed that vaccinated rhesus monkeys produced neutralizing antibody against prototypic viruses with titers of 512-1024 (GMT = 878), against the Beta variant B.1.351 with titers of 32–768 (GMT = 168), Alpha variant B.1.1.7 with titers of 64–2048 (GMT = 324), Delta variant B.1.617.2 with titers of 64–768 (GMT = 206), and Omicron variant B.1.1.592 with titers of 8–128. The factor changes of four variants GMT over that of prototypic virus were 5.2, 2.7, 4.3 and 31.6 respectively (Fig. 1c), which was consistent with the clinical results from vaccinated volunteers (Fig. 1a).
Dynamic analysis of cellular immune responses was conducted in the peripheral blood monocytes (PBMCs) of rhesus monkeys via flow cytometry. The results indicated that an increased proportion of T cells and monocytes occurred on 3 dpi, followed by slight decrease in Beta (B.1.351) or Delta (B1.617.2)-infected animals, in which vaccination of prototypic SARS-CoV-2 could restore the proportion of T cells. Whereas, frequencies of B cells and NK cells decreased upon variants infection, which was recovered by vaccination only in Alpha (B.1.1.7)-infection animals (Fig. 2). These results suggested that the prototypic SARS-CoV-2 inactivated vaccine could induce the immune protection against the emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants.
Vaccination of the prototypic SARS-CoV-2 inactivated vaccine reduces the shedding of SARS-CoV-2 variants
Next, we evaluated the cross-protection of prototypic SARS-CoV-2 vaccine against its variants in rhesus monkeys. Vaccinated animals were challenged with SARS-CoV-2 variants at 20 days post 3rd immunization. We found relatively lower copy number of viral RNA in nasal swabs, throat swabs and anal swabs from vaccinated animals as compared to those from unvaccinated animals post inoculations of VOCs, suggesting that vaccination could reduce the shedding of viral variants to some extent, particularly for the variant Delta (B.1.672.2) (Fig. 3a). On the day 7 post infection (dpi), lower copy numbers of viral genomes and subgenomes were observed in the lung tissues of vaccinated animals, indicating vaccination could inhibit the replication of SARS-CoV-2 variants in lung (Fig. 3b, c). These results demonstrated that neutralizing antibody induced by prototypic SARS-CoV-2 inactivated vaccine could reduce the transmission and replication of emerging VOCs.
The prototypic SARS-CoV-2 inactivated vaccine ameliorates the pathological changes in the lung caused by infections of SARS-CoV-2 variants
To further evaluate the cross-protection induced by inactivated vaccine against variants, we examined the histopathological changes in lung tissues harvested on 7 dpi since pulmonary pathology is widely accepted to be the golden standard for COVID-19. Typical histopathological lesions were observed in the lung tissues from all vaccinated or unvaccinated animals post challenge of viral variants, including thickening of pulmonary septum, pulmonary septal hemorrhage, infiltration of Inflammatory cells, thickening of local vascular wall, lymphocytic nodule, vascular lumen thrombosis, dispersed dust cells, pigmentation, proliferation of pulmonary epithelial cells, cellular or proteinaceous exudate (Fig. 4a), which was similar to those in lungs of prototypical SARS-CoV-2 challenged animals. Strikingly, it is promising that vaccination of prototypic inactivated vaccine improved the pathological changes in variants-challenged groups (Fig. 4b). To understand the protective mechanism, we evaluated the inflammatory cytokines in vaccinated or unvaccinated animals. In serum samples, levels of inflammatory cytokines didn’t correlate with the vaccination or viral inoculation (Fig. 5a). Notably, vaccination declined the concentration of multiple inflammatory cytokines in lung tissues from the delta strain Delta (B.1.617.2) infected animals, but not the other two variants (Fig. 5b). Together, these results indicated that the prototypic SARS-CoV-2 vaccine provided certain cross-protection against the circulating VOCs.
Discussion
Although the SARS-CoV-2 vaccines have been used on an unprecedented scale worldwide,20 which plays a key role in combating COVID-19,21 the cross protection of vaccine against emerging variants is being a global concern.16,22,23 This is exacerbated with frequently reported breakthrough infection of SARS-CoV-2 variants in vaccinated population.24 Promisingly, there are some clinical studies showing that prototypic SARS-CoV-2 vaccine could provide some degree of protection against emerging variants, mainly reduce the severity and mortality of COVID-19.25,26,27 This study, via in vitro neutralization assay and in vivo rhesus monkey model, demonstrated that prototypic inactivated vaccine induced neutralizing antibody and further provided the cross-protection of animals against circulating VOCs, including the decreased virus shedding, replication and improved pathological changes in lung. These results are similar with those reported in the clinical studies.28,29
Level of neutralizing antibody reflects host’s resistance to viral infection and may be a predictor of vaccine efficiency,30.31 Results of clinical samples from in vitro neutralization assay of SARS-CoV-2 shows that neutralizing antibody induced by prototypic vaccines can crossly neutralize VOCs to some extension.32 Analysis of large scale of clinical data suggests that neutralizing antibody levels in patients could be highly related with immune protection from symptomatic COVID-19.33,34 However, it is hard to determine the optimal level of neutralizing antibody that could provide protection against SARS-CoV-2, particularly VOCs. In this study, neutralizing assay via authentic viruses suggests that neutralizing antibody induced by prototypic SARS-CoV-2 had decreasing ability of neutralization against variants, titers of which were from 1:8 to 1:2048 (Fig. 1c), but these antibodies showed certain protection crossly against emerging Alpha, Beta and Delta variants in vivo (Fig. 4). For the variant Omicron, it could be still neutralized in vitro by prototypic SARS-CoV-2 induced antibody although NT decreased (Fig. 1a–c). Since neutralizing antibody titres can be used as predictors of protection against SARS-CoV-2 variants,33,35 we predict prototypic SARS-CoV-2 vaccine could provide cross-protection against the Omicron variant in vivo. Furthermore, the optimal level of neutralizing antibody should be determined for cross-protection against SARS-CoV-2 variants, which will be valuable to guide the use of vaccines.
Due to medical ethics, there are some common limitations for most of clinical studies about COVID-19, which makes it hard to accurately compare the cross protection of prototypic SARS-CoV-2 vaccine against its variants. In contrast, advantages of the present study are: firstly, the established NHP model that is widely accepted to be suitable for COVID-19 researches; secondly, animals could be immunized with the same batch of vaccine at the same dose; thirdly, the equal amount of viral particles was used to infect the vaccinated animals; lastly, the viral shedding, replication, inflammatory cytokines and immune response could be evaluated at different time points to dynamically explore the cross protection and possible mechanism of vaccine immunity. Therefore, the highlight of this study is the analysis of the cross-protections among variants comparatively in both longitudinal and sectional approaches, which is very hard to be performed in clinical patients.
In unvaccinated rhesus monkeys that were inoculated with SARS-CoV-2 variants, we observed the viral shedding from nasal swabs, anal swab and throat swabs, immune responses, viral replication and classical pathology in in lung tissues, which is similar to the reported NHP models of COVID-19,19,36 indicating the success of NHP models of SARS-CoV-2 variants infection. However, the shortcoming of this study is that only two animals were used in each unvaccinated group due to the limitation of non-human primate resource. Therefore, we could not conduct the statistical analysis to show the significant differences between vaccinated and unvaccinated groups.
In conclusion, the results of this study suggests that the prototypic SARS-CoV-2 inactivated vaccine could induce certain protections against the circulating VOCs, although further experiments are urgently anticipated to elucidate the mechanism of this cross-protection.
Materials and methods
Ethics and biosafety statement
Collection of human serum sample was approved by the institutional review board and performed after inform consent signed. All animal procedures were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the Institute of Medical Biology, Chinese Academy of Medical Science (ethics number: DWLL202106 003), and performed in strict accordance with the guidelines for the National Care and Use of Animals approved by the National Animal Research Authority (PR China) and the
Experimental Animal Ethics Committee of the Institute in the ABSL-4 facility of the National Kunming High-level Biosafety Primate Research Center, Yunnan, China.
Vaccines
The prototypic strain of SARS-CoV-2 KMS-1 was inactivated and developed for vaccine by Medical Biology (IMB), Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (CAMS), as described previously.37 This vaccine is named as VacKMS1 in this study for convenience. The concentration of vaccine antigen was determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and defined as ELISA unit (EU).
Viruses
In addition to the prototypic strain of SARS-CoV-2, four emerging VOCs were chosen for this study. The prototypic SARS-CoV-2 strain (GD108) and Beta variant (B.1.351, GDPCC-nCOV84, CSTR.16698.06. NPRC 2.062100001) were gifted from Guangdong CDC, Alpha variant (B.1.1.7, SARS-CoV-2/C-Tan-BJ202101(B1.1.7), CSTR.16698.06. NPRC 2.062100002) from China CDC, Delta variant (B.1.617.2, CQ79, CSTR.16698.06. NPRC 6. CCPM-B-V-049-2105-8) from Chongqing CDC and Omicron variant (B.1.1.529 CCPM-B-V-049-2112-18) from Institute of laboratory animal sciences, CAMS&PUMC. All strains of viruses were amplified in Vero-E6 or Vero cells, cultured in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS and 1% P/S. The titration of virus for challenging was determined via the plaque assay as previously described.19 The whole genomes of GD108, Alpha, Beta, Delta and Omicron were sequenced (data not shown) and characteristic mutation sites in S gene were analyzed (Supplementary Fig. 1).
Animals
The non-human primates in this study were rhesus monkeys that were all male and around 1-year-old. Twelve animals were immunized with 150 EU of the prototypic SARS-CoV-2 inactivated vaccine three times at 0, 14 and 28 days, followed by the intranasal and intratracheal (0.5 ml each) inoculation of three VOCs respectively (four animals for each variant) at the dosage of 106 pfu/animal/1 ml at 20 days post the third immunization (Fig. 1b).
Determination of viral loads and viral replications
Viral loads were determined as described previously.19 Briefly, total RNA was purified via ZYMO kit according to the protocol recommended by manufacture. Real-time RT-PCR was used to quantify the viral RNA genome or subgenome using TaqMan Fast Virus 1-Step Master Mix (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) and purified SARS-CoV-2 RNA as a standard curve on a CFX384 Touch Real-Time PCR Detection System (Bio-Rad, USA).
Micro-neutralization assay
Serum was serially diluted by two-fold with DMEM medium in 96-well plates for micro-neutralization assay. Each well contained 120 ul of each diluted serum sample. Viruses were diluted to the concentration of 2000 pfu/ml with DMEM. 120 μl of diluted viruses was added to each well containing equal volume of diluted serum sample, followed by incubation at 37 °C and 5% CO2 for 60 min. Meanwhile, 100 ul of Vero-E6 cells (2 × 105 cells/ml) were seeded into each well of 96-well plate. After 1 hour incubation, 100 ul of the mixture of serum and viruses in each well were transferred to Vero-E6 cells in each well of 96-well plate. Plates were incubated at 37 °C and 5% CO2 for 5 days. Cytopathogenic effect was recorded to evaluate the neutralizing ability of serum sample. The TCID50 at the highest dilution was defined as the neutralization titer (NT). Factor change of NT was calculated by GMT of prototypic SARS-CoV-2 over variants GMT.
Cytokine assay
The concentration of cytokine in serum and tissue samples was determined via the MILLIPLEX MAP Non-Human Primate Cytokine Magnetic Bead Panel—Immunology Multiplex Assay (Cat# PRCYTOMAG-40K, Millipore, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol on a Bio-Plex machine (Bio-Rad, USA). The 23 inflammatory cytokines in this panel are IL-1ra, IL-1β, IL-2, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-8/CXCL8, IL-10, IL-12p40, IL-13, IL-15, IL-17A/CTLA8, IL-18, G-CSF, GM-CSF, IFN-γ, MCP-1/CCL2, MIP-1α/CCL3, MIP-1β/CCL4, sCD40L, TGF-α, TNF-α, and VEGF.
Flow cytometric analysis of peripheral blood monocytes
Peripheral blood monocytes (PBMCs) were prepared from anticoagulant whole blood via Ficoll-PaqueTM Plus (Cat#17144003, cytiva, Sweden). 5 ml of peripheral blood was collected in a vacutainer blood collection tube containing anticoagulant. Equal volume of PBS was added to dilute the blood. This diluted blood was transferred and slowly dropped onto 5 ml Ficoll-PaqueTM Plus, followed by centrifugation at room temperature (RT) and 2000 rpm for 20 min with the highest acceleration and the lowest deceleration. PBMCs at the thin and white 2nd layer was harvested and transferred to a 15 ml corning tube. PBMCs were washed twice by addition of PBS and centrifugation at RT and 2000 rpm for 5 min, stained with fluorescent-conjugated antibodies against cell-specific markers and analyzed on the flow cytometer Cytoflex (Beckman).
Histology
On 7 dpi, animals were euthanized and dissected for histopathological analysis. Six lobes of each lung (three from left and three from right) were harvested for preparing formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded sections (5 μm) and further for hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining. The H&E stained slides were evaluated by an experienced pathologist in a double-blind manner. Six-grade scoring system from the least severe to the most severe (0–5) was used to evaluate the histopathological changes in every slide based on the severity of histopathological changes as follows, thickening of pulmonary septum, pulmonary septal hemorrhage, infiltration of Inflammatory cells, thickening of local vascular wall, lymphocytic nodule, vascular lumen thrombosis, dispersed dust cells, pigmentation, proliferation of pulmonary epithelial cells, cellular or proteinaceous exudate. At least five fields in a slide were randomly selected from each lobe of lung tissue of rhesus monkey (upper left, middle left, lower left, upper right, middle right and lower right, a total of six lobes). The average of pathological scores of all lobes is defined as the comprehensive pathological score of the whole lung of the rhesus monkey.
References
Nicola, M. et al. The socio-economic implications of the coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19): a review. Int J. Surg. 78, 185–193 (2020).
Milman, O. et al. Community-level evidence for SARS-CoV-2 vaccine protection of unvaccinated individuals. Nat. Med. 27, 1367–1369 (2021).
Creech, C. B., Walker, S. C. & Samuels, R. J. SARS-CoV-2 Vaccines. JAMA 325, 1318–1320 (2021).
Krammer, F. SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in development. Nature 586, 516–527 (2020).
Tregoning, J. S., Flight, K. E., Higham, S. L., Wang, Z. & Pierce, B. F. Progress of the COVID-19 vaccine effort: viruses, vaccines and variants versus efficacy, effectiveness and escape. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 21, 626–636 (2021).
Dagan, N. et al. Effectiveness of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine in pregnancy. Nat. Med. 27, 1693–1695 (2021).
Lee, W. S., Wheatley, A. K., Kent, S. J. & DeKosky, B. J. Antibody-dependent enhancement and SARS-CoV-2 vaccines and therapies. Nat. Microbiol. 5, 1185–1191 (2020).
Hasan, A., Al-Mulla, M. R., Abubaker, J. & Al-Mulla, F. Early insight into antibody-dependent enhancement after SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination. Hum. Vaccin. Immunother. 17, 4121–4125 (2021).
Zhou, Y. et al. Enhancement versus neutralization by SARS-CoV-2 antibodies from a convalescent donor associates with distinct epitopes on the RBD. Cell Rep. 34, 108699 (2021).
Cines, D. B. & Bussel, J. B. SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine–Induced Immune Thrombotic Thrombocytopenia. N. Engl. J. Med. 384, 2254–2256 (2021).
Elalamy, I. et al. SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine and Thrombosis: an Expert Consensus on Vaccine-Induced Immune Thrombotic Thrombocytopenia. Thromb. Haemost. 121, 982–991 (2021).
Sharifian-Dorche, M. et al. Vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia and cerebral venous sinus thrombosis post COVID-19 vaccination; a systematic review. J. Neurol. Sci. 428, 117607 (2021).
Harvey, W. T. et al. SARS-CoV-2 variants, spike mutations and immune escape. Nat. Rev. Microbiol 19, 409–424 (2021).
Tao, K. et al. The biological and clinical significance of emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants. Nat. Rev. Genet 22, 757–773 (2021).
VanBlargan, L. A. et al. An infectious SARS-CoV-2 B.1.1.529 Omicron virus escapes neutralization by therapeutic monoclonal antibodies. Nat. Med. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-021-01678-y (2022).
Krause, P. R. et al. SARS-CoV-2 Variants and Vaccines. N. Engl. J. Med. 385, 179–186 (2021).
Arora, P. et al. The spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 variant A.30 is heavily mutated and evades vaccine-induced antibodies with high efficiency. Cell Mol. Immunol. 18, 2673–2675 (2021).
Hodgson, S. H. et al. What defines an efficacious COVID-19 vaccine? A review of the challenges assessing the clinical efficacy of vaccines against SARS-CoV-2. Lancet Infect. Dis. 21, e26–e35 (2021).
Lu, S. et al. Comparison of nonhuman primates identified the suitable model for COVID-19. Sig. Transduct. Target Ther. 5, 157 (2020).
Mathieu, E. et al. A global database of COVID-19 vaccinations. Nat. Hum. Behav. 5, 947–953 (2021).
Shah, A. S. V. et al. Effect of Vaccination on Transmission of SARS-CoV-2. N. Engl. J. Med. 385, 1718–1720 (2021).
Karim, S. S. A. Vaccines and SARS-CoV-2 variants: the urgent need for a correlate of protection. Lancet (Lond., Engl.) 397, 1263–1264 (2021).
Hacisuleyman, E. et al. Vaccine Breakthrough Infections with SARS-CoV-2 Variants. N. Engl. J. Med. 384, 2212–2218 (2021).
Bergwerk, M. Covid-19 Breakthrough Infections in Vaccinated Health Care Workers. N. Engl. J. Med. 385, 1474–1484 (2021).
Stamatatos, L. et al. mRNA vaccination boosts cross-variant neutralizing antibodies elicited by SARS-CoV-2 infection. Sci. (N. Y., N. Y.) 372, 1413–1418 (2021).
Xie, X. et al. Neutralization of SARS-CoV-2 spike 69/70 deletion, E484K and N501Y variants by BNT162b2 vaccine-elicited sera. Nat. Med. 27, 620–621 (2021).
Emary, K. R. W. et al. Efficacy of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (AZD1222) vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 variant of concern 202012/01 (B.1.1.7): an exploratory analysis of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet (Lond., Engl.) 397, 1351–1362 (2021).
Bruxvoort, K. J. et al. Effectiveness of mRNA-1273 against delta, mu, and other emerging variants of SARS-CoV-2: test negative case-control study. BMJ 375 (2021).
Nemet, I. et al. Third BNT162b2 Vaccination Neutralization of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron Infection. N. Engl. J. Med. 386, 492–494 (2021).
Coudeville, L. et al. Relationship between haemagglutination-inhibiting antibody titres and clinical protection against influenza: development and application of a bayesian random-effects model. BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 10, 18 (2010).
Garcia-Beltran, W. F. et al. COVID-19-neutralizing antibodies predict disease severity and survival. Cell 184, 476–488.e411 (2021).
Edara, V. V., Hudson, W. H., Xie, X., Ahmed, R. & Suthar, M. S. Neutralizing Antibodies Against SARS-CoV-2 Variants After Infection and Vaccination. JAMA 325, 1896–1898 (2021).
Khoury, D. S. et al. Neutralizing antibody levels are highly predictive of immune protection from symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection. Nat. Med. 27, 1205–1211 (2021).
Earle, K. A. et al. Evidence for antibody as a protective correlate for COVID-19 vaccines. Vaccine 39, 4423–4428 (2021).
Cromer, D. et al. Neutralising antibody titres as predictors of protection against SARS-CoV-2 variants and the impact of boosting: a meta-analysis. Lancet Microbe 3, e52–e61 (2022).
Zheng, H. et al. Virulence and pathogenesis of SARS-CoV-2 infection in rhesus macaques: a nonhuman primate model of COVID-19 progression. PLoS Pathog. 16, e1008949 (2020).
Che, Y. et al. Randomized, double-blinded and placebo-controlled phase II trial of an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in healthy adults. Clin. Infect. Dis. 73, e3949–e3955 (2020).
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by the National Key R&D Project of China (2021YFC230170402, 2021YFC0863300, 2020YFC0846400, 2020YFA0707602), Kunming Science and Technology Project (2020-1-II−021), CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences (2021-1-I2M-038, and 2020-I2M-CoV19-012), Yunnan Key R&D Project (202003AC100003, 202103AQ100001).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
T. X., S. L., Z. H., H. L., and J. W. contributed equally as senior authors to this study. Q. L., Z. X., S. L., Z. H., and X. P. conceived and designed the study. S. L., H. L., and J. W. participated in data extraction and analysis. S. L. and H. L. wrote the paper. J. W., W. Y., Y. Y., Y. Z., Z. L., C. T., Y. Z., H. W., D. K., T. Y., H. L., L. Y., F. Y., Y. L., H. X., J. W., R. L. performed animal experiments and assays. W. T. provided the original alpha viruses. All authors critically reviewed the paper and decided to proceed with publication. Q. L., Z. X., and X. P. supervised the study.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Xie, T., Lu, S., He, Z. et al. Three doses of prototypic SARS-CoV-2 inactivated vaccine induce cross-protection against its variants of concern. Sig Transduct Target Ther 7, 61 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41392-022-00920-4
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41392-022-00920-4
This article is cited by
-
Biparatopic antibody BA7208/7125 effectively neutralizes SARS-CoV-2 variants including Omicron BA.1-BA.5
Cell Discovery (2023)
-
Psychometric evidence of a perception scale about covid-19 vaccination process in Peruvian dentists: a preliminary validation
BMC Health Services Research (2022)