Application of next-generation imaging in biochemically recurrent prostate cancer

Background Biochemical recurrence (BCR) following primary interventional treatment occurs in approximately one-third of patients with prostate cancer (PCa). Next-generation imaging (NGI) can identify local and metastatic recurrence with greater sensitivity than conventional imaging, potentially allowing for more effective interventions. This narrative review examines the current clinical evidence on the utility of NGI for patients with BCR. Methods A search of PubMed was conducted to identify relevant publications on NGI applied to BCR. Given other relevant recent reviews on the topic, this review focused on papers published between January 2018 to May 2023. Results NGI technologies, including positron emission tomography (PET) radiotracers and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging, have demonstrated increased sensitivity and selectivity for diagnosing BCR at prostate-specific antigen (PSA) concentrations <2.0 ng/ml. Detection rates range between 46% and 50%, with decreasing PSA levels for choline (1–3 ng/ml), fluciclovine (0.5–1 ng/ml), and prostate-specific membrane antigen (0.2–0.49 ng/ml) PET radiotracers. Expert working groups and European and US medical societies recommend NGI for patients with BCR. Conclusions Available data support the improved detection performance and selectivity of NGI modalities versus conventional imaging techniques; however, limited clinical evidence exists demonstrating the application of NGI to treatment decision-making and its impact on patient outcomes. The emergence of NGI and displacement of conventional imaging may require a reexamination of the current definitions of BCR, altering our understanding of early recurrence. Redefining the BCR disease state by formalizing the role of NGI in patient management decisions will facilitate greater alignment across research efforts and better reflect the published literature.


INTRODUCTION
Biochemical recurrence (BCR) occurs in 20-50% of patients with prostate cancer (PCa) within 10 years after primary definitive therapy, i.e., radical prostatectomy (RP) or external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) [1,2].In general, BCR is defined as a rise in serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels (Table 1) [3][4][5].However, PSA is not necessarily cancer-specific and, after definitive treatments, residual or low-level increases in PSA might be due to benign residual prostate tissue remaining in situ, or due to recurrent benign prostate growth after EBRT or other minimally invasive therapies [6].Furthermore, there is no consensus on the definition of undetectable PSA and the optimal threshold for initiating therapy post-RP [3,4].BCR can be a sign of local recurrence (prostate/seminal vesicles) and/ or metastases to lymph node, bone, or viscera [7,8], particularly in high-risk patients [4].Detecting recurrent PCa in the early, oligometastatic setting, allows the consideration for metastasisdirected therapy (MDT) [9].
Imaging patients with suspected BCR offers key information required by a multidisciplinary team of medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, nuclear medicine physicians, pathologists, and urologists to guide clinical management.For decades, conventional imaging techniques, including computed tomography (CT) and technetium-99m ( 99m Tc) bone scintigraphy, have been used for the assessment of clinical progression in BCR.However, these modalities offer a limited evaluation of recurrent disease at low PSA values (<10 ng ml) [10], with a low probability of positive bone scan (4.5%) and CT (14%) in BCR [11].
Next-generation imaging (NGI) technologies may overcome the sensitivity limitations associated with low PSA results and offer improved diagnostic accuracy for identifying smaller tumor foci compared with conventional imaging [12].NGI technologies are defined as advanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and positron emission tomography (PET) that combine PCa biology with novel radiotracers to detect recurrent disease currently undetectable with conventional imaging techniques [13].Previous research on the diagnostic and therapeutic implications of NGI technologies in BCR has been promising [14][15][16][17][18].A comprehensive systematic review of the literature through 2018 confirmed the high detection rate of various NGI modalities for early recurrence at PSA values < 0.5 ng/ml [19].Importantly, information provided by NGI has influenced current treatment strategies in up to 70% of patients with BCR [20,21].In light of these findings, Radiographic Assessments for Detection of Advanced Recurrence III, European and US medical societies have provided specific recommendations on the use of NGI in BCR [3-5, 13, 22].
This narrative review expands upon the previous research and comprehensively examines the current clinical evidence to elucidate whether NGI may help to identify local recurrence/ micrometastatic disease in BCR, thus clarifying the historical BCR definition.We will further discuss the application of NGI modalities to clinical practice in the context of latest recommendations by medical societies.A detailed review of treatment options for patients with BCR will be discussed in a companion narrative review.

METHODS
A comprehensive search of PubMed was conducted to identify relevant publications on the role of NGI in the identification of men with BCR and subsequent treatment, with a particular focus on prospective randomized controlled trials.Searches were limited to English-language publications in peer-reviewed journals from January 2018 to May 2023.Additional articles were identified by examining reference lists in all relevant publications.The literature search included the following keywords: 'prostate neoplasms'; 'biochemical recurrence'; 'imaging'.Database searches yielded 214 articles, of which 88 were included in this review after title/abstract screening and full-text selection.The levels of evidence for the included studies are presented in Table S1.

Nuclear imaging
PET radiotracers have been increasingly utilized for diagnostic evaluation and guiding MDT in patients with BCR due to their various tracer affinities for metabolic processes that aid in disease detection and targeted therapy [9,23].In BCR, both PSA levels and kinetics influence detection rates for PET tracers [24].However, when PSA concentrations first begin to rise ( < 0.5 ng/ml), detection depends on the histologically-confirmed tumor size and expression of radiotracer target (e.g., prostate-specific membrane antigen [PSMA]), which can be suboptimal, resulting in limited sensitivity [22,[25][26][27].Therefore, it is important to evaluate the performance of radiotracers being considered at PSA concentrations <0.5 ng/ml.
Radiotracers that are approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for use in patients with PCa include carbon 11 ( 11 C)-choline, fluorine 18 ( 18 F)-sodium fluoride, 18  Choline.Choline is essential for phospholipid biosynthesis in all cell membranes.In PCa, increased choline uptake by malignant cells with increased cell proliferation can be assessed by 11 C-choline PET.A PSA value of 1-2 ng/ml is estimated to be the optimal threshold for the diagnostic efficiency of choline PET in BCR [28].In 358 patients with BCR evaluated with 11 C-choline PET/ CT, the percentage of patients with positive scans increased with increasing PSA levels: 19% of patients with PSA levels of 0.2-1.0ng/ml, 46% of patients with PSA levels 1-3 ng/ml, and 82% of patients with PSA levels >3 ng/ml [28].According to a meta-analysis, 11 C-choline PET/CT has displayed good accuracy in detection of lymph node metastasis and/or distant lesions, but the findings on local recurrence were inconclusive due to high between-study heterogeneity [14].An additional disadvantage of 11 C-choline is its short half-life (20 min), limiting availability to centers with a cyclotron/radiochemistry facility onsite [17].Alternatively, 18 F-choline has a longer half-life and similar performance as 11 C-choline in BCR [29].Increased lesion detection rates have been observed for PSADT of ≤6 months (65%) and average PSA levels >1 ng/ml (67%) [30].
The open-label FALCON trial of 104 patients who developed a first episode of BCR reported that 18 F-fluciclovine PET/CT imaging resulted in a change in management for 64% (n = 66) of those scanned, 24% of whom transitioned from salvage to systemic therapy [34].The prospective EMPIRE-1 study used 18 F-fluciclovine to guide salvage EBRT post-RP in 165 patients with BCR and no evidence of metastases upon conventional imaging; 3-year eventfree survival was significantly improved in the 18 F-fluciclovine PET/ CT group (Δ 12.5%; 95% CI 4.3-20.8;p = 0.003) compared with the conventional imaging group [35].Given the approval of fluciclovine by regulatory authorities, this radiotracer is widely available in the US and Europe, but has limited use in the rest of the world due to widespread availability of PSMA-targeted PET imaging radiotracers.
Sodium fluoride. 18F-sodium fluoride ( 18 F-NaF) is a bone-specific radiotracer that can identify areas of abnormal osteogenic activity and is used to detect skeletal metastases [36].According to a perpatient (N = 148) and per-lesion (N = 744) analysis in patients with PCa, 18 F-NaF demonstrated superior imaging sensitivity and specificity in detection of bone metastases compared with conventional scintigraphy (p < 0.001, for both) [37].In a prospective study of 37 patients with BCR, the positive detection rate of bone metastases missed by conventional CT and bone scan was 16% [38].A retrospective analysis observed that mean PSA levels were two-fold higher (4.11 vs. 2.02 ng/ml) in patients positive for bone metastases (22% [8/36]) compared with patients with negative 18 F-NaF PET/CT scans [39].Additionally, PSA velocity significantly predicted positive scan outcomes.Initial results from the National Oncologic PET Registry revealed 18 F-NaF PET imaging (N = 1997) revised the treatment plan for 52% of cases where first osseous metastasis were detected [40].Subsequent analysis from this registry demonstrated that detection of osseous metastases with 18 F-NaF PET imaging was important for effective patient management and, ultimately, patient survival [41].However, the reduced specificity and narrow applicability of 18 F-NaF to bone compared with novel PET tracers, have limited its use [36].
PSMA.PSMA is a transmembrane glycoprotein overexpressed in PCa compared with normal prostate tissues and other tissues [42].PSMA PET has produced encouraging diagnostic results and is an attractive target due to its rapid internalization and blood clearance.
68 Ga-PSMA. 68Ga-PSMA PET is a promising diagnostic technique given its ability to detect recurrent PCa.A significant increase (p < 0.001) in detection rates across predefined PSA ranges was reported in a single-arm prospective study of 635 patients with BCR imaged with 68 Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT or PET/MRI [43].In this study, the overall detection rate was 75%, with a positive predictive value (PPV) of 0.84-0.92.Based partly on the results of this study, 68 Ga-PSMA-11 PET was approved by the FDA for institutional use in 2020 for patients with suspected metastasis curable via surgery or radiation therapy, as well as for those with suspected BCR based on elevated PSA values [44].In a subsequent prospective multicenter study examining 68 Ga-PSMA PET in 2005 patients with recurrent PCa, the overall per-patient scan positivity rate was 78%, with increasing positivity rates at higher PSA concentration subgroups: <0.25 ng/ml, 44.8%; 0.25-0.49ng/ml, 50.5%; 0.5-0.99 ng/ml, 69.2%; 1.00-1.99ng/ml, 78.1%; and >2.00 ng/ml, 95% (95% CI 92-97) [45].Factors that significantly correlated with the detection rate included Gleason grade group from RP biopsies (p < 0.001) and clinical T-stage (p < 0.01), but not Gleason grade group at initial biopsy (p = 0.86).Confirmed by histopathology, 68 Ga-PSMA-11 PET imaging reported PPV of 83% in bone, 83% in prostate and prostate bed, 72% in pelvic lymph nodes, and 88% in extrapelvic soft tissues.Furthermore, in a prospective study, 68 Ga-PSMA-11 PET impacted staging and management of 197 patients with BCR [46].A prospective phase 3 study of 82 patients demonstrated per-patient positivity that was noninferior when PSMA-11 was labeled with 18 F or 68 Ga [47].
In a prospective, direct comparison trial of 18 F-fluciclovine PET/ CT and 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT for patients with post-operative PSA levels 0.2-2.0ng/ml, PSMA PET/CT detected recurrence sites at lower PSA concentrations more frequently and with high interreader agreement compared with 18 F-fluciclovine PET/CT [48].Overall, the detection rate was 26% for 18 F-fluciclovine PET/CT and 56% for PSMA PET/CT.However, in a study of patients with BCR (mean PSA, 14.9 ng/ml), the detection rate for 68 Ga-PSMA-11 PET was significantly reduced compared with 18 F-fluciclovine for local recurrence near the urinary bladder (28% vs. 38%; p = 0.03) [49].
DCFPyL.The performance of 18 F-DCFPyL, a second-generation PSMA radiotracer, was similar to 68 Ga-PSMA-11 in a direct comparison [50].The phase 2/3 OSPREY trial of 93 patients with BCR by conventional imaging demonstrated high sensitivity (median, 96%; 95% CI 88-99) and PPV (median, 82%; 95% CI 74-90) for 18 F-DCFPyL PET/CT [51].Sensitivity and PPV for 18 F-DCFPyL PET/CT ranged from 89-100% and 62-89%, respectively, in patients with low PSA values (<2 ng/ml).In another phase 2 study (N = 92), similar PPV values (89%; 95% CI 75-97) were reported [52].In the CONDOR phase 3 study of 208 patients with suspected BCR (median PSA, 0.8 ng/ml) and negative or equivocal upon conventional imaging, 18 F-fluciclovine or 11 C-choline PET, imaging with 18 F-DCFPyL had a disease detection rate and correct localization rate (CLR) of 59-66% and 85-87%, respectively, by independent blinded review. 18F-DCFPyL PET results also changed the clinical management in 64% of patients, including 21% of patients who had negative findings with conventional imaging [53].Of note, the median CLR was 73% for patients with a baseline PSA level of <0.5 ng/ml.Multivariable analysis from two studies of 245 patients with BCR demonstrated that PSA levels and PSA doubling time were independent predictors of scan positivity and disease location [54].In 2021, 18 F-DCFPyL received FDA approval as a diagnostic PET radiotracer for PSMA-positive lesions in patients with PCa and suspected metastases who are candidates for definitive therapy or with BCR.

PSMA PET and BCR risk stratification
Accumulating evidence suggests that the detection performance of PSMA-targeted PET imaging varies across BCR risk categories as defined by the EAU risk-scoring system [62][63][64].Post-RP, high-risk is defined as PSADT ≤ 1 year or Gleason score 8-10; post-EBRT, high-risk is defined as interval from primary therapy to biochemical failure ≤18 months or Gleason score 8-10 [64].In a multivariate analysis of patients with BCR and no known metastasis (N = 1960), the BCR high-risk group had a higher likelihood of metastatic disease by PSMA PET compared with the low-risk group (odds ratio, 2.91; 95% CI 2.18-3.93)[62].Among patients with high-risk BCR, PSMA PET positivity rate for distant metastases was higher post-EBRT (70% [110/158]) compared with post-RP (37% [342/931]).Thus, EAU BCR risk groups do not completely characterize the extent of disease.However, PSMA PET can provide key information to refine disease extent, and potentially inform treatment decisions.In this context, a retrospective single-center study of 276 men with detectable PSA levels following EBRT or brachytherapy who underwent 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT found positive scans in 55 of 73 patients (75.3%) with pre-scan PSA values below the Phoenix definition of BCR, <0.5 ng/ml (66.7% [8/12]); 0.5-< 1.0 ng/ml (77.8% [14/18]); 1-< 2.0 ng/ml (76.7% [33/43]).In this subgroup, 38/73 (52.1%) patients were identified as the suitable candidates for salvage therapy based on the PSMA-detected local recurrence and/or nodal disease within the extended pelvic lymph node dissection field [65].Notably, a panel of cancer specialists at the Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference 2019 rated PSMA PET as the preferred imaging modality for detecting clinical progression (80-87% consensus), and for confirming a CT/scintigraphy-based diagnosis of oligorecurrent oligometastatic PCa (75% consensus) in patients with BCR [66].
In the ORIOLE phase 2 study, 54 patients with oligometastatic disease on conventional imaging were randomized to SBRT or observation [70].All patients treated with SBRT had a baseline and post-treatment PSMA scan.The investigative team and patients were blinded to the PSMA PET data; therefore, for some patients, baseline PET lesions were not included in the treatment fields.The results demonstrated that SBRT was associated with improved outcomes at 6 months.Treatment of all lesions identified using 18 F-DCFPyL-PSMA PET/CT with MDT (all lesions treated, N = 19; lesions untreated, N = 16), was associated with improved median PFS at 6 months (treated, not evaluable; untreated lesions, 11.8 months; p = 0.006) and median distant metastases-free survival (treated, 29 months; untreated lesions, 6.0 months; p < 0.001) [70].
Similarly, in a prospective phase 2 study including 72 patients post-EBRT or RP with rising PSA (0.4-3.0 ng/ml) and negative upon conventional imaging, 53% (n = 38) had oligorecurrent disease following 18 F-DCFPyL PET whole-body MRI/CT and, due to NGI, were treated with MDT without ADT [71].With a median follow-up of 15.9 months posttreatment, the overall response rate was 60% (22/37), including 22% (8/37) with no evidence of disease for a median duration of 7.7 months.However, the long-term prognosis of these patients remains unclear.In comparison, EMPIRE-1 trial demonstrated that treatment decision and EBRT planning guided by 18 F-fluciclovine PET/CT plus conventional imaging (n = 79) versus conventional imaging alone (n = 81) significantly improved 4-year failure-free survival rate in patients with detectable post-RP PSA and negative conventional imaging (75.5% vs 51.2%; p < 0.0001) [35].A retrospective analysis of 305 patients with BCR detected with 68 Ga-PSMA PET treated with MDT (median nodal 1 [range 0-19]; median extranodal 1 [range 0-5]) plus ADT demonstrated that the MDT + ADT combination significantly improved biochemical PFS (p < 0.001) [72].The significant increase was only reported in men receiving MDT + ADT for >6 months.However, even though ADT + MDT in combination improved biochemical PFS significantly, the investigators noted that disease progression occurred significantly more often with MDT monotherapy patients (85% vs. 29%; p < 0.001) requiring additional salvage therapies compared with ADT + MDT combination [72].Of note, following MDT, 95% of patients experienced a PSA reduction with or without concurrent ADT.
Ongoing clinical trials will help elucidate the long-term survival benefits of NGI-directed therapeutic interventions in patients with BCR or oligometastatic disease (Table 3).
Combinations of various mpMRI techniques have also been investigated.In a study of 43 patients with post-RP BCR (mean PSA level, 0.71 ng/ml), combination mpMRI, i.e., T2-weighted imaging combined with DWI (p = 0.04), DCE-MRI (p = 0.02), or both (p < 0.001), was more predictive of local recurrence compared with T2-weighted MRI alone [74].A meta-analysis of mpMRI studies post-RP showed that the highest pooled mean sensitivities were demonstrated by DCE + MRS (89%), followed by DWI + T2 imaging (82%), and DCE + T2 imaging (82%) [75].The DCE + MRS and DCE + T2 imaging combinations also reported the highest pooled mean specificities (92%).Most studies included in this analysis evaluated local recurrence with PPV that varied depending on the sequence.Data indicate that combination mpMRI may be the most effective in detecting BCR among mpMRI modalities, and further investigation is warranted.Prospective data also suggest a potential role for mpMRI to guide salvage high-intensity focused ultrasound (sHIFU) in patients with BCR post-EBRT, evaluate local recurrence prior to and following the sHIFU, and inform subsequent treatment decisions [76].

NGI in clinical practice and PCa guidelines
Advanced imaging modalities could contribute to guiding subsequent treatment decision-making in patients with BCR.However, several obstacles could prevent the routine adoption of NGI in the US clinical practice, including racial, geographical, and insurance coverage disparities in access [77,78].In contrast, due to the actions taken by regulatory authorities in other countries such as Australia, accessible and insurance-covered PSMA PET/CT is replacing conventional imaging as the preferred imaging modality for patients with BCR, with potentially beneficial impact on patient care optimization [79].Lack of specificity (e.g., uptake in other benign or malignant lesions) for PCa associated with fluciclovine and PSMA PET may result in false-positive lesions, highlighting the importance of a concurrent diagnostic CT scan [26,80].Additional reasons for false-positive findings include low standardized uptake values, post-EBRT activity and inflammation and challenges with analysis around the bladder neck [81,82].Other limitations with PSMA PET include low resolution for lesions <4 mm and low target expression (Table 2) [81].Limited global availability is another limitation of PSMA PET."Flares" in PSMA tracer uptake, e.g., after commencing ADT, may result in increased sensitivity of existing disease, if confirmed, and complicate treatment choice [83,84].An expert panel published guidelines to standardize interpretation of PSMA PET that should improve accuracy, precision, and repeatability [85].
Optimal results with mpMRI are largely dependent on the equipment, acquisition of high-quality images, and the experience of the radiologist interpreting the images [86].In addition, treatment with ADT has been reported to negatively impact the sensitivity and accuracy detection by mpMRI [87].To address these issues, the Prostate Imaging for Recurrence Reporting was published to globally standardize parameters for image acquisition, image interpretation, and reporting of mpMRI in local pelvic PCa recurrence after primary treatment [88].
Current guidelines from medical societies afford clinicians the opportunity to consider imaging modalities under certain circumstances (Table 1) [3][4][5]13].However, clinical evidence is needed to recommend the most appropriate imaging technique available to address the clinical issue in question with the highest level of accuracy and confidence [4].The AUA/ASTRO/ SUO guidelines advise that clinicians utilize PET/CT as an alternative to conventional imaging, or when detection of foci suspicious for malignancy is interpreted as negative or equivocal on conventional imaging in patients at high risk for metastases [3].The ASCO guideline recommends PSMA imaging; 11 C-choline or 18 F-fluciclovine PET/CT or PET/MRI; 18 F-NaF PET/CT and/or whole-body MRI in patients with BCR and negative conventional imaging who are candidates for salvage therapy [13].In contrast, the 2023 National Comprehensive Cancer Network Guidelines® recommend that PSMA PET tracers serve as front-line imaging tools for BCR due to the increased sensitivity and specificity compared with conventional imaging [4].The National Comprehensive Cancer Network also suggests that mpMRI is preferred over CT for pelvic staging of BCR [4].Additionally, the Radiographic Assessments for Detection of Advanced Recurrence VII working group recommends considering moleculartargeted imaging, a new term suggested for NGI, to detect metastatic foci and inform subsequent treatments in patients with rising PSA ≥ 0.2 ng/dl after primary treatment, including patients with PSA levels below the Phoenix definition [89].

DISCUSSION
NGI for BCR is changing the evaluation and management of recurrent PCa.In the near future, BCR identified by conventional imaging will be replaced in clinics with access to NGI.Multiple novel radiotracers are being evaluated clinically (Table 3), thus, as NGI becomes more sensitive for detecting recurrent disease, and is accessible for more patients, the current definition of the disease state for BCR will need to evolve to address the influence of NGI on BCR diagnosis.In other words, NGI can identify recurrence at lower PSA levels compared with conventional imaging, thus affecting treatment selection, and allowing novel interventional strategies that may enhance patient outcomes (Table 4).However, it is necessary for the medical community to align on an updated definition for BCR that incorporates the role of NGI.Therefore, we propose that it is time for the disease state of BCR to be updated and redefined to account for the impact of NGI.
Advances in MRI and PET have demonstrated the potential to detect BCR not otherwise captured by increases in PSA concentrations and conventional imaging (Fig. 1).At the time of this review, mpMRI and PSMA PET have demonstrated the highest sensitivity and specificity of NGI applications.Of note, the performance of PSMA PET radiotracers has been evaluated in multiple sites of recurrence, in contrast to mpMRI, which focused on local recurrences.Importantly, application of NGI is beneficial only if it informs clinical management decisions that lead to a more favorable clinical outcome.A novel area of research is the application of mpMRI to the "radiomics" of PCa, i.e., extraction and quantitative assessment of advanced imaging features of prostate tumors, including volume/shape, volume intensity histograms, texture, and transform analysis to identify subregions with distinct phenotypic characteristics [90].This radiomic approach could facilitate earlier detection and more personalized patient management.

Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Radiotracers
Rationale: Rising prostate-specific antigen (PSA) after primary definitive therapy for prostate cancer does not completely identify early recurrence or oligometastasis; conventional imaging techniques have limited diagnostic value at PSA <10 ng/ml
Clinical nomograms are being developed to identify patients who should be considered for NGI [54,91].Unfortunately, limited data exist on the application of NGI to BCR, specifically how NGI influences the timing of intervention and subsequent patient outcomes.However, clinical studies indicate that utilizing NGI to identify patients with BCR who would benefit from treatment, can have an impact on patient outcomes [35,70].However, limitations remain associated with image resolution and their routine adoption in clinical practice [83].Despite the evidence of costeffectiveness in the BCR setting [92], the wider use of NGI in the US practice is further impeded by inconsistent access and insurance coverage issues [78].Clearly, there is a need for more evidence-based prospective clinical trials [35,70] and correlative guidelines to support the routine application of NGI in patients with BCR.Nevertheless, NGI is here to stay and use will only increase with time.
The present narrative review did not follow a systematic search strategy based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses framework to allow for a broad coverage of the evidence on the rapidly evolving role of NGI technologies in BCR management.This limitation should be considered when interpreting the synthesized evidence in this review.

CONCLUSION
Current evidence confirms the increased sensitivity and selectivity of NGI technologies for detecting BCR, with the potential to inform treatment strategies.Global clinical practice guidelines recommend NGI in the diagnostic workup of patients with BCR upon negative/ equivocal findings or as an alternative to conventional imaging.Considering the advancements observed with NGI, we propose that the disease state of BCR needs to be updated and redefined.
aThreshold not clearly defined.

Table 3 .
Active clinical trials evaluating NGI in patients with BCR.