Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Clinical Research
  • Published:

Sexual function outcomes of radiation and androgen deprivation therapy for localized prostate cancer in men with good baseline function

Abstract

Background

Sexual dysfunction, including erectile dysfunction and loss of libido, are common among men undergoing treatment for localized prostate cancer. Both local treatments and systemic androgen deprivation therapy may contribute to these outcomes and are differentially indicated based on disease characteristics. We sought to compare sexual function through 5 years after radiation treatment with and without androgen deprivation therapy in men with good baseline sexual function to better understand long-term effects in this understudied subset of patients.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed a prospectively assembled population-based cohort of men who underwent radiation with and without androgen deprivation therapy for intermediate or high-risk localized prostate cancer. Sexual function was assessed longitudinally over 5 years. Men with erections sufficient for intercourse at baseline were selected for inclusion.

Results

Out of 167 patients included, 73 underwent radiation alone and 94 received androgen deprivation therapy plus radiation (51 with intermediate and 43 with high-risk disease). Androgen deprivation therapy use was associated with worse sexual function through 1 year regardless of disease risk. This difference was no longer statistically significant at 3 years in the intermediate-risk group. Compared to radiation alone, androgen deprivation therapy in high-risk disease was associated with worse sexual function at 3 years (effect: −20.3 points, CI [−31.8, −8.8], p < 0.001) but not at 5 years (effect: −3.4, CI [−17.2, 10.5], p = 0.63).

Conclusions

Androgen deprivation therapy plus radiation is associated with worse sexual function through 3-years follow-up in men with high-risk prostate cancer compared to radiation alone. The addition of androgen deprivation therapy in the treatment of intermediate-risk disease does not appear to result in worse sexual function at 3 or 5-year follow-up compared to radiation alone.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Patient selection criteria.
Fig. 2: Hormone and Sexual Function Outcomes.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fode M, Sonksen J. Sexual function in elderly men receiving androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). Sex Med Rev. 2014;2:36–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Mohler JL, Antonarakis ES, Armstrong AJ, D’Amico AV, Davis BJ, Dorff T, et al. Prostate cancer, version 4.2019, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2019;17:479–505.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Armagan A, Hatsushi K, Toselli P. The effects of testosterone deficiency on the structural integrity of the penile dorsal nerve in the rat. Int J Impot Res. 2008;20:73–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Aversa A, Isidori AM, Spera G, Lenzi A, Fabbri A. Androgens improve cavernous vasodilation and response to sildenafil in patients with erectile dysfunction. Clin Endocrinol. 2003;58:632–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Haliloglu A, Baltaci S, Yaman O. Penile length changes in men treated with androgen suppression plus radiation therapy for local or locally advanced prostate cancer. J Urol. 2007;177:128–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Donovan KA, Walker LM, Wassersug RJ, Thompson LM, Robinson JW. Psychological effects of androgen-deprivation therapy on men with prostate cancer and their partners. Cancer. 2015;121:4286–99.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Grossmann M, Zajac JD. Management of side effects of androgen deprivation therapy. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 2011;40:655–71. x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Barocas DA, Alvarez J, Resnick MJ, Koyama T, Hoffman KE, Tyson MD, et al. Association between radiation therapy, surgery, or observation for localized prostate cancer and patient-reported outcomes after 3 years. JAMA. 2017;317:1126–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Barocas DA, Chen V, Cooperberg M, Goodman M, Graff JJ, Greenfield S, et al. Using a population-based observational cohort study to address difficult comparative effectiveness research questions: the CEASAR study. J Comp Eff Res. 2013;2:445–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Szymanski KM, Wei JT, Dunn RL, Sanda MG. Development and validation of an abbreviated version of the expanded prostate cancer index composite instrument for measuring health-related quality of life among prostate cancer survivors. Urology. 2010;76:1245–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Stier DM, Greenfield S, Lubeck DP, Dukes KA, Flanders SC, Henning JM, et al. Quantifying comorbidity in a disease-specific cohort: adaptation of the total illness burden index to prostate cancer. Urology. 1999;54:424–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. White H. A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance-matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica. 1980;48:817–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing V; 2019. https://www.R-project.org/.

  14. Denham JW, Steigler A, Lamb DS, Joseph D, Turner S, Matthews J, et al. Short-term neoadjuvant androgen deprivation and radiotherapy for locally advanced prostate cancer: 10-year data from the TROG 96.01 randomised trial. Lancet Oncol. 2011;12:451–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Roach M 3rd, Bae K, Speight J, Wolkov HB, Rubin P, Lee RJ, et al. Short-term neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy and external-beam radiotherapy for locally advanced prostate cancer: long-term results of RTOG 8610. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:585–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Jones CU, Hunt D, McGowan DG, Amin MB, Chetner MP, Bruner DW, et al. Radiotherapy and short-term androgen deprivation for localized prostate cancer. N. Engl J Med. 2011;365:107–18.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. D’Amico AV, Chen MH, Renshaw AA, Loffredo M, Kantoff PW. Androgen suppression and radiation vs radiation alone for prostate cancer: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2008;299:289–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Bolla M, de Reijke TM, Van Tienhoven G, Van den Bergh AC, Oddens J, Poortmans PM, et al. Duration of androgen suppression in the treatment of prostate cancer. N. Engl J Med. 2009;360:2516–27.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Lawton CAF, Lin X, Hanks GE, Lepor H, Grignon DJ, Brereton HD, et al. Duration of androgen deprivation in locally advanced prostate cancer: long-term update of NRG Oncology RTOG 9202. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017;98:296–303.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Chen CT, Valicenti RK, Lu J, Derose T, Dicker AP, Strup SE, et al. Does hormonal therapy influence sexual function in men receiving 3D conformal radiation therapy for prostate cancer? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2001;50:591–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Teloken PE, Ohebshalom M, Mohideen N, Mulhall JP. Analysis of the impact of androgen deprivation therapy on sildenafil citrate response following radiation therapy for prostate cancer. J Urol. 2007;178:2521–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Daly PE, Dunne MT, O’Shea CM, Finn MA, Armstrong JG. The effect of short term neo-adjuvant androgen deprivation on erectile function in patients treated with external beam radiotherapy for localised prostate cancer: an analysis of the 4- versus 8-month randomised trial (Irish Clinical Oncology Research Group 97-01). Radiother Oncol. 2012;104:96–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Son CH, Chennupati SK, Kunnavakkam R, Liauw SL. The impact of hormonal therapy on sexual quality of life in men receiving intensity modulated radiation therapy for prostate cancer. Pr Radiat Oncol. 2015;5:e223–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kushnir T, Gofrit ON, Elkayam R, Paluch-Shimon S, Lawrence YR, Weiss L, et al. Impact of androgen deprivation therapy on sexual and hormonal function in patients receiving radiation therapy for prostate cancer. Isr Med Assoc J. 2016;18:49–3.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Sanda MG, Dunn RL, Michalski J, Sandler HM, Northouse L, Hembroff L, et al. Quality of life and satisfaction with outcome among prostate-cancer survivors. N. Engl J Med. 2008;358:1250–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Mullins BT, Basak R, Broughman JR, Chen RC. Patient-reported sexual quality of life after different types of radical prostatectomy and radiotherapy: analysis of a population-based prospective cohort. Cancer. 2019;125:3657–65.

  27. Alemozaffar M, Regan MM, Cooperberg MR, Wei JT, Michalski JM, Sandler HM, et al. Prediction of erectile function following treatment for prostate cancer. JAMA. 2011;306:1205–14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Roach M 3rd, Nam J, Gagliardi G, El Naqa I, Deasy JO, Marks LB. Radiation dose-volume effects and the penile bulb. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010;76(3 Suppl):S130–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Broughman JR, Basak R, Nielsen ME, Reeve BB, Usinger DS, Spearman KC, et al. Prostate cancer patient characteristics associated with a strong preference to preserve sexual function and receipt of active surveillance. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2018;110:420–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the men who participated in CEASAR and shared their experiences. We thank all the study managers, staff, and chart abstractors for their efforts in data collection and help with this study.

Funding

This study was supported by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (1R01HS019356, 1R01HS022640) and the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (CE-12-11-4667). Data management was facilitated by Vanderbilt University’s Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) system, which is supported by the Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research grant (UL1TR000011 from NCATS/NIH).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Daniel D. Joyce or Zhiguo Zhao.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Joyce, D.D., Wallis, C.J.D., Luckenbaugh, A.N. et al. Sexual function outcomes of radiation and androgen deprivation therapy for localized prostate cancer in men with good baseline function. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 25, 238–247 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41391-021-00405-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41391-021-00405-5

Search

Quick links