Abstract
Studies on the -omics of child neurodevelopmental outcomes, e.g. genome, epigenome, microbiome, metabolome, and brain connectome aim to enable data-driven precision health to improve these outcomes, or deliver the right intervention, to the right child, at the right time. However, evidence suggests that neurodevelopmental outcomes are shaped by modifiable socioenvironmental factors. Everyday exposures including family and neighbourhood-level socioeconomic status, housing conditions, and interactions with those living in the home, are strongly associated with child health and have been suggested to alter -omics. Our aim was to review and understand the biological pathways by which home factors contribute to child neurodevelopment outcomes. We review studies suggestive of the home factors contributing to neurodevelopmental outcomes that encompass the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, the brain, the gut-brain-axis, and the immune system. We thus conceptualize home-ics as the study of how the multi-faceted living environment can impact neurodevelopmental outcomes through biology and highlight the importance of targeting the modifiable aspects of a child’s home to optimize outcomes. We encourage clinicians and health care providers to routinely assess home factors in patient encounters, and counsel families on modifiable aspects of the home. We conclude by discussing clinical and policy implications and future research directions of home-ics.
Impact
-
Home-ics can be conceptualized as the study of how home factors may shape child neurodevelopmental outcomes through altering biology.
-
Targeting modifiable aspects of a child’s home environment (e.g. parenting style, early intervention, enriched environment) may lead to improved neurodevelopmental outcomes.
-
Clinicians should routinely assess home factors and counsel families on modifiable aspects of the home.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 14 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $18.50 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Micheel, C. M. et al. Omics-Based Clinical Discovery: Science, Technology, and Applications. in Evolution of Translational Omics: Lessons Learned and the Path Forward (National Academies Press (US), 2012).
Hasin, Y., Seldin, M. & Lusis, A. Multi-omics approaches to disease. Genome Biol. 18, 83 (2017).
Davis, M. M. & Shanley, T. P. The missing -omes: proposing social and environmental nomenclature in precision medicine. Clin. Transl. Sci. 10, 64–66 (2017).
Phelan, J. C., Link, B. G., Diez-Roux, A., Kawachi, I. & Levin, B. Fundamental causes’ of social inequalities in mortality: a test of the theory. J. Health Soc. Behav. 45, 265–285 (2004).
World Health Organization. A conceptual framework for action on the social determinants of health. 76 (2010).
Putnick, D. L. et al. Place-based child opportunity at birth and child development from infancy to age 4. J. Pediatr. 267, 113909 (2024).
Ferrara, P. et al. Child opportunity index: a multidimensional indicator to measure neighborhood conditions influencing children’s health. J. Pediatr. 264, 113649 (2024).
Webb, S. et al. Neighbourhood socioeconomic status indices and early childhood development. SSM - Popul. Health 3, 48–56 (2016).
Sharma, A. K., Kroeker, K., Chateau, D., Brownell, M. & Rodd, C. J. Assessing childhood health outcome inequalities with area-based socioeconomic measures: a retrospective cross-sectional study using Manitoba population data. Pediatr. Res. 88, 496–502 (2020).
Hollingshead, A. B. Four Factor Index of Social Status. (Yale University, New Haven, CT, 1975).
Kachmar, A. G., Connolly, C. A., Wolf, S. & Curley, M. A. Q. Socioeconomic status in pediatric health research: a scoping review. J. Pediatr. 213, 163–170 (2019).
Robyn, S., Veronica, N., Stephen, B. & Joanne, P. Undernutrition in young children with congenital heart disease undergoing cardiac surgery in a low-income environment. BMC Pediatr. 24, 73 (2024).
Fischer, L., Muleta, H. & Essel, K. Narrative review: food as medicine across the pediatric age continuum. Curr. Opin. Pediatr. 36, 23–32 (2024).
Kamino, D. et al. Postnatal polyunsaturated fatty acids associated with larger preterm brain tissue volumes and better outcomes. Pediatr. Res. 83, 93–101 (2018).
Schneider, J. et al. Nutrient intake in the first two weeks of life and brain growth in preterm neonates. Pediatrics 141, e20172169 (2018).
Christensen, D. L., Schieve, L. A., Devine, O. & Drews-Botsch, C. Socioeconomic status, child enrichment factors, and cognitive performance among preschool-age children: results from the follow-up of growth and development experiences study. Res. Dev. Disabil. 35, 1789–1801 (2014).
Raviv, T., Kessenich, M. & Morrison, F. J. A mediational model of the association between socioeconomic status and three-year-old language abilities: the role of parenting factors. Early Child. Res. Q. 19, 528–547 (2004).
Treyvaud, K. et al. Parenting behavior is associated with the early neurobehavioral development of very preterm children. Pediatrics 123, 555–561 (2009).
Miller, J. V., Chau, V., Synnes, A., Miller, S. P. & Grunau, R. E. Brain Development and Maternal Behavior in Relation to Cognitive and Language Outcomes in Preterm-Born Children. Biol. Psychiatry https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2022.03.010 (2022).
Felitti, V. J. et al. Relationship of childhood abuse and household dysfunction to many of the leading causes of death in adults. The Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACE) Study. Am. J. Prev. Med. 14, 245–258 (1998).
Carroll, J. E. et al. Childhood abuse, parental warmth, and adult multisystem biological risk in the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults study. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. Usa. 110, 17149–17153 (2013).
Taylor, S. E., Lerner, J. S., Sage, R. M., Lehman, B. J. & Seeman, T. E. Risky Families Questionnaire. https://doi.org/10.1037/t03616-000 (2004).
Christensen, R., Chau, V., Synnes, A., Grunau, R. E. & Miller, S. P. Longitudinal neurodevelopmental outcomes in preterm twins. Pediatr. Res. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41390-020-0840-7 (2020).
McCartney, K., Harris, M. J. & Bernieri, F. Growing up and growing apart: A developmental meta-analysis of twin studies. Psychol. Bull. 107, 226–237 (1990).
Benavente-Fernández, I. et al. Association of socioeconomic status and brain injury with neurodevelopmental outcomes of very preterm children. JAMA Netw. Open 2, e192914 (2019).
Linsell, L., Malouf, R., Morris, J., Kurinczuk, J. J. & Marlow, N. Prognostic factors for poor cognitive development in children born very preterm or with very low birth weight: a systematic review. JAMA Pediatr. 169, 1162–1172 (2015).
Hair, N. L., Hanson, J. L., Wolfe, B. L. & Pollak, S. D. Association of child poverty, brain development, and academic achievement. JAMA Pediatr. 169, 822–829 (2015).
Doyle, L. W. et al. Biological and social influences on outcomes of extreme-preterm/low-birth weight adolescents. Pediatrics 136, e1513–e1520 (2015).
Christensen, R. et al. Preterm neurodevelopmental trajectories from 18 months to 4.5 years. J. Pediatr. 258, 113401 (2023).
Noble, K. G., Norman, M. F. & Farah, M. J. Neurocognitive correlates of socioeconomic status in kindergarten children. Dev. Sci. 8, 74–87 (2005).
Noble, K. G., McCandliss, B. D. & Farah, M. J. Socioeconomic gradients predict individual differences in neurocognitive abilities. Dev. Sci. 10, 464–480 (2007).
Sentenac, M. et al. Maternal education and cognitive development in 15 European very-preterm birth cohorts from the RECAP Preterm platform. Int. J. Epidemiol. 50, 1824–1839 (2022).
Benavente-Fernández, I., Siddiqi, A. & Miller, S. P. Socioeconomic status and brain injury in children born preterm: modifying neurodevelopmental outcome. Pediatr. Res. 87, 391–398 (2020).
Miller, S. P. et al. Predictors of 30-month outcome after perinatal depression: role of proton MRS and socioeconomic factors. Pediatr. Res. 52, 71–77 (2002).
Neukomm, A. et al. Perioperative brain injury in relation to early neurodevelopment among children with severe congenital heart disease: results from a European collaboration. J. Pediatr. 266, 113838 (2023).
Oyegbile-Chidi, T. et al. The impact of sociodemographic disadvantage on cognitive outcomes in children with newly diagnosed seizures and their unaffected siblings over 36 months. Pediatr. Neurol. 148, 178–188 (2023).
Middlebrooks, J. S. The Effects of Childhood Stress on Health Across the Lifespan. (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, 2007).
Hibbard, R. A., Ingersoll, G. M. & Orr, D. P. Behavioral risk, emotional risk, and child abuse among adolescents in a nonclinical setting. Pediatrics 86, 896–901 (1990).
Glaser, D. Child abuse and neglect and the brain-a review. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 41, 97–116 (2000).
Prasad, M. R., Kramer, L. A. & Ewing-Cobbs, L. Cognitive and neuroimaging findings in physically abused preschoolers. Arch. Dis. Child. 90, 82–85 (2005).
Hart, H. & Rubia, K. Neuroimaging of child abuse: a critical review. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 6, 52 (2012).
Pechtel, P. & Pizzagalli, D. A. Effects of early life stress on cognitive and affective function: an integrated review of human literature. Psychopharmacol. 214, 55–70 (2011).
Douglas Bremner, J. et al. Deficits in short-term memory in adult survivors of childhood abuse. Psychiatry Res 59, 97–107 (1995).
Brody, G. H. Siblings’ direct and indirect contributions to child development. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 13, 124–126 (2004).
Jæger, M. M. The extended family and children’s educational success. Am. Sociol. Rev. 77, 903–922 (2012).
Wang, Y., Chen, X., Wang, A., Jordan, L. P. & Lu, S. Research review: grandparental care and child mental health – a systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 65, 568–586 (2024).
McLean, M. A. et al. Association of neonatal pain-related stress and parent interaction with internalizing behaviors across 1.5, 3.0, 4.5, and 8.0 years in children born very preterm. JAMA Netw. Open 5, e2238088 (2022).
Bradley, R. H. et al. Early indications of resilience and their relation to experiences in the home environments of low birthweight, premature children living in poverty. Child Dev. 65, 346–360 (1994).
Palmer, F. B. et al. Early adversity, socioemotional development, and stress in urban 1-year-old children. J. Pediatr. 163, 1733–1739.e1 (2013).
Palma-Gudiel, H., Córdova-Palomera, A., Leza, J. C. & Fañanás, L. Glucocorticoid receptor gene (NR3C1) methylation processes as mediators of early adversity in stress-related disorders causality: A critical review. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 55, 520–535 (2015).
Gomaa, N. Social epigenomics: conceptualizations and considerations for oral health. J. Dent. Res. 101, 1299–1306 (2022).
McEwen, B. S. Physiology and neurobiology of stress and adaptation: central role of the brain. Physiol. Rev. 87, 873–904 (2007).
Park, L., Gomaa, N. & Quinonez, C. Racial/ethnic inequality in the association of allostatic load and dental caries in children. J. Public Health Dent. 82, 239–246 (2022).
Lucente, M. & Guidi, J. Allostatic load in children and adolescents: a systematic review. Psychother. Psychosom. 92, 295–303 (2023).
Dedovic, K., Duchesne, A., Andrews, J., Engert, V. & Pruessner, J. C. The brain and the stress axis: The neural correlates of cortisol regulation in response to stress. NeuroImage 47, 864–871 (2009).
Bogdan, R. & Hariri, A. R. Neural embedding of stress reactivity. Nat. Neurosci. 15, 1605–1607 (2012).
Essex, M. J. et al. Influence of early life stress on later hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis functioning and its covariation with mental health symptoms: A study of the allostatic process from childhood into adolescence. Dev. Psychopathol. 23, 1039–1058 (2011).
McLean, M. A., Weinberg, J., Synnes, A. R., Miller, S. P. & Grunau, R. E. Relationships between cortisol levels across early childhood and processing speed at age 4.5 years in children born very preterm. Child Neuropsychol. J. Norm. Abnorm. Dev. Child. Adolesc. 1–19 https://doi.org/10.1080/09297049.2024.2314958 (2024).
Dieckmann, L. & Czamara, D. Epigenetics of prenatal stress in humans: the current research landscape. Clin. Epigenetics 16, 20 (2024).
Lussier, A. A. et al. Association between the timing of childhood adversity and epigenetic patterns across childhood and adolescence: findings from the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC) prospective cohort. Lancet Child Adolesc. Health 7, 532–543 (2023).
Lam, L. L. et al. Factors underlying variable DNA methylation in a human community cohort. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 109, 17253–17260 (2012).
Horvath, S. & Raj, K. DNA methylation-based biomarkers and the epigenetic clock theory of ageing. Nat. Rev. Genet. 19, 371–384 (2018).
Gomaa, N. et al. Association of pediatric buccal epigenetic age acceleration with adverse neonatal brain growth and neurodevelopmental outcomes among children born very preterm with a neonatal infection. JAMA Netw. Open 5, e2239796 (2022).
Dunn, E. C. The role of neighborhood social characteristics on the epigenome—why the lack of investigations? JAMA Netw. Open 3, e206111 (2020).
Noble, K. G. et al. Family income, parental education and brain structure in children and adolescents. Nat. Neurosci. 18, 773–778 (2015).
McDermott, C. L. et al. Longitudinally mapping childhood socioeconomic status associations with cortical and subcortical morphology. J. Neurosci. 39, 1365–1373 (2019).
Decker, A. L., Duncan, K., Finn, A. S. & Mabbott, D. J. Children’s family income is associated with cognitive function and volume of anterior not posterior hippocampus. Nat. Commun. 11, 4040 (2020).
Stiver, M. L. et al. Maternal postsecondary education associated with improved cerebellar growth after preterm birth. J. Child Neurol. 30, 1633–1639 (2015).
Lawson, G. M., Duda, J. T., Avants, B. B., Wu, J. & Farah, M. J. Associations between children’s socioeconomic status and prefrontal cortical thickness. Dev. Sci. 16, 641–652 (2013).
Luby, J. et al. The effects of poverty on childhood brain development: the mediating effect of caregiving and stressful life events. JAMA Pediatr. 167, 1135–1142 (2013).
Noble, K. G., Houston, S. M., Kan, E. & Sowell, E. R. Neural correlates of socioeconomic status in the developing human brain. Dev. Sci. 15, 516–527 (2012).
Jednoróg, K. et al. The influence of socioeconomic status on children’s brain structure. PLOS ONE 7, e42486 (2012).
Leijser, L. M., Siddiqi, A. & Miller, S. P. Imaging evidence of the effect of socio-economic status on brain structure and development. Semin. Pediatr. Neurol. 27, 26–34 (2018).
Tooley, U. A. et al. Associations between neighborhood SES and functional brain network development. Cereb. Cortex N. Y. N. 1991 30, 1–19 (2020).
Pruessner, J. C. et al. Deactivation of the limbic system during acute psychosocial stress: evidence from positron emission tomography and functional magnetic resonance imaging studies. Biol. Psychiatry 63, 234–240 (2008).
Taylor, S. E. et al. Neural bases of moderation of cortisol stress responses by psychosocial resources. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 95, 197–211 (2008).
De Bellis, M. D. & Kuchibhatla, M. Cerebellar volumes in pediatric maltreatment-related posttraumatic stress disorder. Biol. Psychiatry 60, 697–703 (2006).
De Bellis, M. D. et al. Brain structures in pediatric maltreatment-related posttraumatic stress disorder: a sociodemographically matched study. Biol. Psychiatry 52, 1066–1078 (2002).
Tupler, L. A. & De Bellis, M. D. Segmented hippocampal volume in children and adolescents with posttraumatic stress disorder. Biol. Psychiatry 59, 523–529 (2006).
Jackowski, A. P. et al. Corpus callosum in maltreated children with posttraumatic stress disorder: A diffusion tensor imaging study. Psychiatry Res. Neuroimaging 162, 256–261 (2008).
Teicher, M. H., Tomoda, A. & Andersen, S. L. Neurobiological consequences of early stress and childhood maltreatment: are results from human and animal studies comparable? Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1071, 313–323 (2006).
Sapolsky, R. M. Stress, glucocorticoids, and damage to the nervous system: the current state of confusion. Stress Amst. Neth. 1, 1–19 (1996).
Douglas-Escobar, M. & Weiss, M. D. Hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy: a review for the clinician. JAMA Pediatr. 169, 397–403 (2015).
Ronan, V., Yeasin, R. & Claud, E. C. Childhood development and the microbiome: the intestinal microbiota in maintenance of health and development of disease during childhood development. Gastroenterology 160, 495–506 (2021).
Rook, G. A. W. Evolution and the critical role of the microbiota in the reduced mental and physical health associated with low socioeconomic status (SES). Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 161, 105653 (2024).
Vaher, K., Bogaert, D., Richardson, H. & Boardman, J. P. Microbiome-gut-brain axis in brain development, cognition and behavior during infancy and early childhood. Dev. Rev. 66, 101038 (2022).
Laue, H. E. et al. Sex-specific relationships of the infant microbiome and early-childhood behavioral outcomes. Pediatr. Res. 92, 580–591 (2022).
Dash, S., Syed, Y. A. & Khan, M. R. Understanding the Role of the Gut Microbiome in Brain Development and Its Association With Neurodevelopmental Psychiatric Disorders. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 10, 880544 (2022).
Kwak, S. et al. Sociobiome - Individual and neighborhood socioeconomic status influence the gut microbiome in a multi-ethnic population in the US. Npj Biofilms Microbiomes 10, 1–10 (2024).
Lewis, C. R. et al. Family SES is associated with the gut microbiome in infants and children. Microorganisms 9, 1608 (2021).
Pearson, A. L. et al. Associations detected between measures of neighborhood environmental conditions and human microbiome diversity. Sci. Total Environ. 745, 141029 (2020).
Querdasi, F. R. et al. Multigenerational adversity impacts on human gut microbiome composition and socioemotional functioning in early childhood. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 120, e2213768120 (2023).
Bronfenbrenner, U. Ecological systems theory. in Encyclopedia of Psychology, Vol. 3. 129–133 (American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, US, 2000). https://doi.org/10.1037/10518-046.
Kuh, D. & Shlomo, Y. B. A Life Course Approach to Chronic Disease Epidemiology. (OUP Oxford, 2004).
Knudsen, E. I. Sensitive periods in the development of the brain and behavior. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 16, 1412–1425 (2004).
Schoedl, A. F. et al. The clinical correlates of reported childhood sexual abuse: an association between age at trauma onset and severity of depression and PTSD in adults. J. Child Sex. Abus. 19, 156–170 (2010).
Duerden, E. G. et al. Early procedural pain is associated with regionally-specific alterations in thalamic development in preterm neonates. J. Neurosci. 38, 878–886 (2018).
Pega, F. et al. Unconditional cash transfers for reducing poverty and vulnerabilities: effect on use of health services and health outcomes in low- and middle-income countries. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 3, CD011135 (2022).
Siddiqi, A., Rajaram, A. & Miller, S. P. Do cash transfer programmes yield better health in the first year of life? A systematic review linking low-income/middle-income and high-income contexts. Arch. Dis. Child. 103, 920–926 (2018).
Campbell, F. A. & Ramey, C. T. Effects of early intervention on intellectual and academic achievement: a follow-up study of children from low-income families. Child Dev. 65, 684–698 (1994).
Spittle, A., Orton, J., Anderson, P. J., Boyd, R. & Doyle, L. W. Early developmental intervention programmes provided post hospital discharge to prevent motor and cognitive impairment in preterm infants. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005495.pub4 (2015).
Ball, N. J., Mercado, E. & Orduña, I. Enriched environments as a potential treatment for developmental disorders: a critical assessment. Front. Psychol. 10, 466 (2019).
Morgan, C., Novak, I., Dale, R. C., Guzzetta, A. & Badawi, N. Single blind randomised controlled trial of GAME (Goals - Activity - Motor Enrichment) in infants at high risk of cerebral palsy. Res. Dev. Disabil. 55, 256–267 (2016).
Evans, G. W. The environment of childhood poverty. Am. Psychol. 59, 77–92 (2004).
DeGarmo, D. S., Forgatch, M. S. & Martinez, C. R. Parenting of divorced mothers as a link between social status and boys’ academic outcomes: unpacking the effects of socioeconomic status. Child Dev. 70, 1231–1245 (1999).
Wade, S. L. et al. Randomized clinical trial of online parent training for behavior problems after early brain injury. J. Am. Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry 56, 930–939.e2 (2017).
“Follow-up & Continuing Care - ESCNH - European Standards of Care for Newborn Health.” ESCNH - European Standards of Care for Newborn Health, 31 July 2024. https://newborn-health-standards.org/standards/standards-english/follow-up-continuing-care/. Accessed 5 Sept. 2024.
Deotto, A. et al. Stepping up to COVID-19: a clinical trial of a telepsychology positive parenting program targeting behavior problems in children with neurological risk. J. Pediatr. Psychol. 48, 523–536 (2023).
Morgan, C. et al. Early intervention for children aged 0 to 2 years with or at high risk of cerebral palsy: International Clinical Practice Guideline based on systematic reviews. JAMA Pediatr. 175, 846–858 (2021).
Gomaa, N. & Miller, S. P. Intraventricular haemorrhage in preterm children: viewing longer term with a wider lens. Arch. Dis. Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 106, 2–3 (2020).
Heckman, J., Pinto, R. & Savelyev, P. Understanding the mechanisms through which an influential early childhood program boosted adult outcomes. Am. Econ. Rev. 103, 2052–2086 (2013).
Funding
NG is supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR), the Children’s Health Foundation, and the Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University. SPM is supported by CIHR and the BC Children’s Hospital Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to the conception of the paper, drafting and revising the article. All authors have approved the final version of this article for publication in Pediatric Research.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors have no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Christensen, R., Miller, S.P. & Gomaa, N.A. Home-ics: how experiences of the home impact biology and child neurodevelopmental outcomes. Pediatr Res (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41390-024-03609-2
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41390-024-03609-2