Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Population Study Article
  • Published:

Maximizing the impact of reach out and read literacy promotion:anticipatory guidance and modeling

Pediatric Research volume 95, pages 1644–1648 (2024)Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Reach Out and Read (ROR) is a multi-component pediatric literacy promotion intervention. However, few studies link ROR components to outcomes. We examine associations between receipt of (1) multiple ROR components and (2) clinician modeling, a potential best practice, with enhanced home literacy environments (EHLEs) among Latino families.

Methods

We conducted secondary analyses of cross-sectional enrollment data from a randomized clinical trial at three urban community health centers between November 2020 and June 2023. Latino parents with infants 6–<9 months old were surveyed about ROR component receipt (children’s book, anticipatory guidance, modeling) and EHLE (StimQ2- Infant Read Scale). We used mixed models with clinician as a random effect, adjusting for covariates.

Results

440 Latino parent-infant dyads were included. With no components as the reference category, receipt of 1 component was not associated with EHLE. Receipt of 2 components (standardized beta = 0.27; 95%CI: 0.12–0.42) and 3 components (standardized beta = 0.33; 95% CI: 0.19–0.47) were associated with EHLE. In separate analyses, modeling was associated with EHLE (standardized beta = 0.16; 95%CI: 0.06–0.26).

Conclusion

Findings support modeling as a core ROR component. Programs seeking to enhance equity by promoting EHLE should utilize such strategies as anticipatory guidance and clinician modeling in addition to book distribution.

Impact

  • Reach Out and Read, a multi-component literacy promotion intervention, leverages primary care to promote equity in children’s early language experiences. However, few studies link Reach Out and Read components to outcomes. Among Latino parent-infant dyads, we found that implementation of two and three components, compared to none, was associated with enhanced home literacy environments, following a dose response pattern.

  • Parent report of clinician modeling was associated with enhanced home literacy environments.

  • Literacy promotion programs seeking to enhance equity by promoting enhanced home literacy environments should utilize strategies in addition to book distribution, including anticipatory guidance and modeling, to maximize impact.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on SpringerLink
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Deidentified quantitative data and associated documentation may be made available to interested readers conducting non-profit research consistent with National Institutes of Health policy through the establishment of data sharing agreements. The timeline for release of data will be after the study is completed and main study findings from the final data set are published in peer-reviewed journals. De-identified data will be made available to researchers from accredited institutions who provide a methodologically sound proposal for use in achieving the goals of the approved proposal.

References

  1. Cates, C. B. P., Weisleder, A. P. & Mendelsohn, A. L. Mitigating the effects of family poverty on early child development through parenting interventions in primary care. Acad. Pediatr. 16, S112–S120 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Williams, P. G. et al. School readiness. Pediatrics 144, e20191766 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Zuckerman, B. & Augustyn, M. Books and reading: evidence-based standard of care whose time has come. Acad. Pediatr. 11, 11–17 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Mendelsohn, A. L. et al. The impact of a clinic-based literacy intervention on language development in inner-city preschool children. Pediatrics 107, 130–134 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sharif, I., Reiber, S., Ozuah, P. O. & Reiber, S. Exposure to reach out and read and vocabulary outcomes in inner city Preschoolers. J. Natl. Med. Assoc. 94, 171–177 (2002).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Golova, N., Alario, A. J., Vivier, P. M., Rodriguez, M. & High, P. C. Literacy promotion for hispanic families in a primary care setting: a randomized, controlled trial. Pediatrics 103, 993–997 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Reach out and Read. Start a Site, https://reachoutandread.org/get-involved/start-a-site/ (2022).

  8. Edmunds, S. R. et al. A method for defining the core of a psychosocial intervention to guide adaptation in practice: reciprocal imitation teaching as a case example. Autism 26, 601–614 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. King, T. M., Muzaffar, S. & George, M. P. The role of clinic culture in implementation of primary care interventions: the case of reach out and read. Acad. Pediatr. 9, 40–46 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Khandekar, A. A., Augustyn, M., Sanders, L. & Zuckerman, B. Improving early literacy promotion: a quality-improvement project for reach out and read. Pediatrics 127, e1067–e1072 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Jimenez, M. E. et al. A mixed-methods investigation examining site-level variation in reach out and read implementation. Acad. Pediatr. 23, 913–921 (2022).

  12. Uthirasamy, N. et al. Reach out and read implementation: a scoping review. Acad. Pediatr. 23, 520–549 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Caldwell, A. et al. Literacy promotion training and implementation in pediatric continuity clinics. Acad. Pediatr. 20, 1013–1019 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Erickson, E. et al. Clinician perceptions on literacy promotion in pediatric continuity clinics. Acad. Pediatr. 22, 1192–1199 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Needlman, R., Lone, Z., Chae, R. & Abdullah, N. Literacy promotion strategies within reach out and read: an exploratory study. Clin. Pediatr. 57, 1326–1331 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Zuckerman, B. & Needlman, R. 30 years of reach out and read: need for a developmental perspective. Pediatrics 145, e20191958 (2020).

  17. Scholastic. Kids and family reading report (6th ed.). (2017). Retrieved from http://www.scholastic.com/readingreport/downloads.htm Accessed February 23, 2017.

  18. Jimenez, M. E. et al. Perspectives on shared reading among a sample of latino parents. Child : Care Health Dev. 45, 292–299 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Mendelsohn, A. L. et al. Primary care strategies for promoting parent-child interactions and school readiness in at-risk families: the bellevue project for early language, literacy, and education success. Arch. Pediatr. Adolesc. Med. 165, 33–41 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Cates, C. B. et al. Validation of the StimQ2: A parent-report measure of cognitive stimulation in the home. PLoS One 18, e0286708 (2023).

  21. Vickstrom, E., Shin, H., Collazo, S. & Bauman, K. How Well—Still Good? Assessing the Validity of the American Community Survey English-Ability Question.https://www.census.gov/content/dam/Census/library/working-papers/2015/demo/SEHSD-WP2015-18.pdf (2015).

  22. Duffee, J. H. et al. Early childhood home visiting. Pediatrics 140, e20172150 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Bleses, D., Jensen, P., Højen, A., Slot, P. & Justice, L. Implementing toddler interventions at scale: the case of “we learn together”. Early Child. Res. Q. 57, 12–26 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kraft, M. A. Interpreting effect sizes of education interventions. Educ. Res. 49, 241–253 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Byington, C. L. et al. The good habit of reading (El Buen Habito De La Lectura): parental reactions to an enhanced reach out and read program in a clinic for the underserved. J. Health Care Poor Underserved 19, 363–368 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Jimenez, M. E. et al. Latino parents’ experiences with literacy promotion in primary care: facilitators and barriers. Acad. Pediatr. 20, 1177–1183 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Damschroder, L. J. et al. Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implement. Sci. 4, 50–50 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Kuo, A. A., Franke, T. M., Regalado, M. & Halfon, N. Parent report of reading to young children. Pediatrics 113, 1944–1951 (2004).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Reardon, S. F. & Portilla, X. A. Recent trends in income, racial, and ethnic school readiness gaps at Kindergarten Entry. AERA open 2, 233285841665734 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the families and clinicians who participated in the study, and Nikki Shearman, PhD, for her helpful comments on a draft of this manuscript.

Funding

Funding

This work was supported by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD099125), the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (UL1TR003017), the US Department of Health and Human Services/Health Resources and Service Administration (U3DMD32755), and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (74260). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of these organizations.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Pediatrics, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, USA

    Manuel E. Jimenez, Nila Uthirasamy, Keanaan Malke, Daniel Lima & Usha Ramachandran

  2. Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, USA

    Manuel E. Jimenez, Jennifer R. Hemler, Alicja Bator, Benjamin F. Crabtree & Shawna V. Hudson

  3. Children’s Specialized Hospital, New Brunswick, NJ, USA

    Manuel E. Jimenez

  4. Rutgers School of Public Health, New Brunswick, NJ, USA

    Pamela Ohman Strickland

  5. Department of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, NY, USA

    Thomas I. Mackie

  6. NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA

    Alan L. Mendelsohn

Authors
  1. Manuel E. Jimenez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Nila Uthirasamy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jennifer R. Hemler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Alicja Bator
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Keanaan Malke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Daniel Lima
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Pamela Ohman Strickland
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Usha Ramachandran
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Benjamin F. Crabtree
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Shawna V. Hudson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Thomas I. Mackie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Alan L. Mendelsohn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

All authors meet ICJME criteria for authorship as follows: M.E.J., N.U. and J.R.H. contributed to the conceptualization and design of the research, the acquisition and interpretation of data, and the draft and revision of the manuscript. A.B. contributed to the extraction and interpretation of data, revision of data tables, and the draft and revision of the manuscript. K.M. and D.L. contributed to acquisition and interpretation of data, revision of data tables, and revision of the manuscript. B.F.C., T.I.M., A.L.M., P.O.S., U.R. and S.V.H. contributed to the conceptualization and design of the research, interpretation of data, and critical review and revision of the manuscript. The publication of the work described is approved by all authors. All authors approved the final manuscript and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manuel E. Jimenez.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose. Findings were presented in part at the 2023 Pediatric Academic Societies Meeting in Washington, DC.

Consent to participate

Participant consent was required for study participation.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jimenez, M.E., Uthirasamy, N., Hemler, J.R. et al. Maximizing the impact of reach out and read literacy promotion:anticipatory guidance and modeling. Pediatr Res 95, 1644–1648 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41390-023-02945-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41390-023-02945-z

Search

Advanced search

Quick links