Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Developmental trajectories of late preterm infants and predictors of academic performance

Pediatric Research (2023)Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The trajectories of late preterm development from infancy to kindergarten reading and math, and predictors of academic resilience and risk are unknown.

Methods

Sample included 1200 late preterm infants (LPIs) from the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study, Birth Cohort. Objective measurements of development at 9 and 24 months (Bayley-SFR) and reading and math academic achievement at preschool and kindergarten were standardized; trajectories of late preterm development from 9 months to kindergarten reading and math were identified using latent class growth analysis. Multinomial logistic regression [aOR, 95% CI] identified predictors of academic resilience and risk.

Results

Four trajectory groups were observed for reading and three for math. More optimal trajectories (in reading and math) and academic resilience were associated with experiencing sensitive parenting and preschool attendance. Suboptimal (at-risk) trajectories (in reading or math) and an increased odds of academic risk were associated with <high school education, twin/multiple gestation, prenatal smoking and male sex.

Conclusions

LPI trajectories varied from infancy to kindergarten. More sensitive parenting and preschool attendance predicted academic resilience, and should be encouraged. Select risk factors (prenatal smoking, twin/multiple gestation, male sex, <high school education) predicted academic risk, and can help identify LPIs who might benefit from closer monitoring prior to school entry.

Impact

  • Late preterm infants (LPIs) have developmental risks compared to full terms. LPI trajectories of early reading and math varied from infancy to kindergarten. We identified predictors of academic resilience and risk, which can help inform anticipatory guidance provided to LPIs prior to kindergarten.

  • Promotive factors (sensitive parenting and preschool enrollment) predicted academic resilience. Select maternal and neonatal characteristics (<high school education, male sex, prenatal smoking, and multiple gestation) predicted academic risk at kindergarten.

  • LPIs account for the majority of preterm infants. Encouraging preschool enrollment and fostering sensitive parenting may promote early academic achievement in LPIs, which has population-level impacts.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Learn more

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Developmental trajectories of late preterm infants from infancy to kindergarten academic achievement.
Fig. 2: Adjusted odds (aOR) and Multivarite Predictors of Combined Reading and Math Academic Achievement at Kindergarten.

Data availability

Data for this study were obtained from the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study-Birth Cohort, restricted-use dataset. Data can be accessed after entering into a data use agreement with the Institute of Educational Statistics, National Center for Educational Statistics.

References

  1. Davidoff, M. et al. Changes in the gestational age distribution among US singleton births: Impact on rates of late preterm birth, 1992 to 2002. Semin. Perinatol. 30, 8–15 (2006).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Raju, T. N. K., Higgins, R. D., Stark, A. R. & Leveno, K. J. Optimizing care and outcome for late-preterm (near-term) infants: a summary of the workshop sponsored by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. Pediatrics 118, 1207–1214 (2006).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Shah, P., Kaciroti, N., Richards, B., Oh, W. & Lumeng, J. C. Developmental outcomes of late preterm infants from infancy to kindergarten. Pediatrics 138, e20153496. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2015-3496 (2016).

  4. Williams, B. L. et al. Perinatal origins of first-grade academic failure: role of prematurity and maternal factors. Pediatrics 131, 693 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Chan, E. & Quigley, M. A. School performance at age 7 years in late preterm and early term birth: a cohort study. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 99, F451–F457 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Shah, P. E., Kaciroti, N., Richards, B. & Lumeng, J. C. Gestational age and kindergarten school readiness in a national sample of preterm infants. J. Pediatr. 178, 61–67 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Garfield, C. F. et al. Educational performance of children born prematurely. JAMA Pediatr. 171, 764–770 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Dollar, J. M., Perry, N. B., Calkins, S. D., Keane, S. P. & Shanahan, L. Temperamental anger and positive reactivity and the development of social skills: implications for academic competence during preadolescence. Early Educ. Dev. 29, 747–761 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kalia, J. L., Visintainer, P., Brumberg, H. L., Pici, M. & Kase, J. Comparison of enrollment in interventional therapies between late-preterm and very preterm infants at 12 months’ corrected age. Pediatrics 123, 804–809 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Woodward, L. J., Clark, C. A., Bora, S. & Inder, T. E. Neonatal white matter abnormalities an important predictor of neurocognitive outcome for very preterm children. PLoS One 7, e51879 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Mangin, K. S., Horwood, L. J. & Woodward, L. J. Cognitive development trajectories of very preterm and typically developing children. Child Dev. 88, 282–298 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Erdei, C., Austin, N. C., Cherkerzian, S., Morris, A. R. & Woodward, L. J. Predicting school-aged cognitive impairment in children born very preterm. Pediatrics 145, e20191982. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2019-1982 (2020).

  13. Linsell, L., Malouf, R., Morris, J., Kurinczuk, J. J. & Marlow, N. Prognostic factors for poor cognitive development in children born very preterm or with very low birth weight: a systematic review. JAMA Pediatr. 169, 1162–1172 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Poehlmann-Tynan, J. et al. Risk and resilience in preterm children at age 6. Dev. Psychopathol. 27, 843–858 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Faure, N. et al. Maternal sensitivity: a resilience factor against internalizing symptoms in early adolescents born very preterm? J. Abnorm. Child Psychol. 45, 671–680 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Wolke, D., Jaekel, J., Hall, J. & Baumann, N. Effects of sensitive parenting on the academic resilience of very preterm and very low birth weight adolescents. J. Adolesc. Health 53, 642–647 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Treyvaud, K. et al. Parenting behavior at 2 years predicts school-age performance at 7 years in very preterm children. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 57, 814–821 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Nguyen, T. N. et al. Language skills in children born preterm (<30 wks’ gestation) throughout childhood: associations with biological and socioenvironmental factors. J. Dev. Behav. Pediatr. 40, 735–742 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. ElHassan, N. O. et al. The impact of prematurity and maternal socioeconomic status and education level on achievement-test scores up to 8th grade. PLoS One 13, e0198083 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Chen, J. H., Claessens, A. & Msall, M. E. Prematurity and school readiness in a nationally representative sample of Australian children: does typically occurring preschool moderate the relationship. Early Hum. Dev. 90, 73–79 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Reid, L. D. & Strobino, D. M. A population-based study of school readiness determinants in a large urban public school district. Matern Child Health J. 23, 325–334 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Girsen, A. I., Do, S. C., El-Sayed, Y. Y., Hintz, S. R. & Blumenfeld, Y. J. Association between small-for-gestational age and neurocognitive impairment at two years of corrected age among infants born at preterm gestational ages: a cohort study. J. Perinatol. 37, 958–962 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Potijk, M. R., Kerstjens, J. M., Bos, A. F., Reijneveld, S. A. & de Winter, A. F. Developmental delay in moderately preterm-born children with low socioeconomic status: risks multiply. J. Pediatr. 163, 1289–1295 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Brown, H. K., Speechley, K. N., Macnab, J., Natale, R. & Campbell, M. K. Mild prematurity, proximal social processes, and development. Pediatrics 134, e814–e824 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Johnson, S. et al. Differentiating the preterm phenotype: distinct profiles of cognitive and behavioral development following late and moderately preterm birth. J. Pediatr. 193, 85–92.e81 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Nord, C., Edwards, B., Andreassen, C., Green, J. L., Wallner-Allen, K. Early Childhood Longitudinal Study, Birth Cohort (ECLS-B), User’s Manual for the ECLS-B Longitudinal 9-Month: 2-Year Data File and Electronic Codebook (NCES 2006-046) (US Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, 2006).

  27. Bayley, N. Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development 2nd edn (Harcourt Assessment, 1993).

  28. Snow K, et al. Early Childhood Longitudinal Study, Birth Cohort (ECLS-B) 9-Month—Preschool Restricted-Use Data File and Electronic Codebook. In: U.S. Department of Education NCES, ed. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education; 2007.

  29. Snow, K. et al. Early Childhood Longitudinal Study, Birth Cohort (ECLS-B) Kindergarten 2006 and 2007 Data File User’s Manual (2010-010). In: Statistics NCES, editor. Washington, D.C.: Institute of Educational Sciences, U.S. Department of Education; 2009.

  30. Magidson, J. & Vermunt, J. K. in The Sage Handbook of Quantitative Methodology for the Social Sciences 175–198; Sage Publications, (2004).

  31. Jones, B. L., Nagin, D. S. & Roeder, K. A SAS procedure based on mixture models for estimating developmental trajectories. Sociol. Methods Res. 29, 374–393 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Nagin, D. S. & Nagin, D. Group-Based Modeling of Sevelopment (Harvard University Press, 2005).

  33. Base SAS(R) 9.4 Procedures Guide: Statistical Procedures (Cary, NC 2014).

  34. Munoz-Moreno, E. et al. Structural brain network reorganization and social cognition related to adverse perinatal condition from infancy to early adolescence. Front. Neurosci. 10, 560 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Oros, D. et al. Pathways of neuronal and cognitive development in children born small-for-gestational age or late preterm. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 43, 41–47 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Walsh, J. M., Doyle, L. W., Anderson, P. J., Lee, K. J. & Cheong, J. L. Y. Moderate and late preterm birth: effect on brain size and maturation at term-equivalent age. Radiology 273, 232–240. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.14132410 (2014).

  37. Shonkoff, J. P., Boyce, W. T., Levitt, P., Martinez, F. D. & McEwen, B. Leveraging the biology of adversity and resilience to transform pediatric practice. Pediatrics 147, e20193845 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Bodeau-Livinec, F. et al. Do very preterm twins and singletons differ in their neurodevelopment at 5 years of age? Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 98, F480–F487 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Kristjansson, A. L. et al. Maternal smoking during pregnancy and academic achievement of offspring over time: a registry data-based cohort study. Prev. Med. 113, 74–79 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Weis, M., Heikamp, T. & Trommsdorff, G. Gender differences in school achievement: the role of self-regulation. Front. Psychol. 4, 442 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Spets, D. S., Jeye, B. M. & Slotnick, S. D. Different patterns of cortical activity in females and males during spatial long-term memory. Neuroimage 199, 626–634 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Liu, L. L., Benner, A. D., Lau, A. S. & Kim, S. Y. Mother-adolescent language proficiency and adolescent academic and emotional adjustment among Chinese American families. J. Youth Adolesc. 38, 572–586 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Han, W. J. Bilingualism and academic achievement. Child Dev. 83, 300–321 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Juffer, F., Struis, E., Werner, C. & Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J. Effective preventive interventions to support parents of young children: illustrations from the Video-feedback Intervention to promote Positive Parenting and Sensitive Discipline (VIPP-SD). J. Prev. Interv. Community 45, 202–214 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Mendelsohn, A. L. et al. Use of videotaped interactions during pediatric well-child care: impact at 33 months on parenting and on child development. J. Dev. Behav. Pediatr. 28, 206 (2007).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Garner, A. & Yogman, M. Preventing childhood toxic stress: partnering with families and communities to promote relational health. Pediatrics 148, e2021052582. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2021-052582 (2021).

  47. Gueron-Sela, N., Atzaba-Poria, N., Meiri, G. & Marks, K. The caregiving environment and developmental outcomes of preterm infants: diathesis stress or differential susceptibility effects. Child Dev. 86, 1014–1030 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Poehlmann, J. et al. Preterm infants who are prone to distress: differential effects of parenting on 36-month behavioral and cognitive outcomes. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 53, 1018–1025 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Jaekel, J. & Wolke, D. Preterm birth and dyscalculia. J. Pediatr. 164, 1327–1332 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Labayru, G. et al. Small for gestational age moderate to late preterm children: a neuropsychological follow-up. Dev. Neuropsychol. 46, 277–287 (2021).

  51. Suikkanen, J. et al. Reaction times, learning, and executive functioning in adults born preterm. Pediatr. Res. 89, 198–204 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. MartĂ­nez-Nadal, S. & Bosch, L. Cognitive and learning outcomes in late preterm infants at school age: a systematic review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 18, 74 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Hack, K. E. et al. Long-term neurodevelopmental outcome of monochorionic and matched dichorionic twins. PLoS One 4, e6815 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Williams, P. G. & Lerner, M. A. School readiness. Pediatrics 144, e20191766 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Council on Early Childhood. The pediatrician’s role in optimizing school readiness. Pediatrics 138, e20162293. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2016-2293 (2016).

Download references

Funding

University of Michigan, NICHD (K08HD078506).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Developmental Behavioral Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics, Medical School, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA

    Prachi E. Shah

  2. Department of Human Development and Family Studies, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA

    Julie Poehlmann

  3. Department of Nutritional Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA

    Heidi M. Weeks

  4. Department of Neurosciences, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, University G. D’Annunzio Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy

    Maria Spinelli

  5. Michigan Institute for Clinical & Health Research (MICHR), University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA

    Blair Richards

  6. Research Foundation for Mental Hygiene, New York, NY, USA

    Joohee Suh

  7. Department of Biostatistics, School of Public of Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA

    Niko Kaciroti

Authors
  1. Prachi E. Shah
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Julie Poehlmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Heidi M. Weeks
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Maria Spinelli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Blair Richards
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Joohee Suh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Niko Kaciroti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

P.E.S. conceptualized and designed the study, and drafted and revised the manuscript. N.K. designed the analysis plan and helped interpret the analyses. B.R. began the statistical analyses and H.M.W. completed the analyses. J.S. contributed to the writing of the manuscript. M.S. and J.P. provided substantive input regarding the interpretation of the results, and implications for practice, and assisted with the writing and revision of manuscript. All authors approved the final manuscript as submitted and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Prachi E. Shah.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Consent to participate

None required. This study utilized a publicly available dataset with de-identified participants who could not be linked to the data.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shah, P.E., Poehlmann, J., Weeks, H.M. et al. Developmental trajectories of late preterm infants and predictors of academic performance. Pediatr Res (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41390-023-02756-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41390-023-02756-2

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links