Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Does metabolomic profile differ with regard to birth weight?

Abstract

Background

Macrosomia and child obesity are growing health-care issues worldwide. The purpose of the study was to evaluate how extremely high or low birth weight affects metabolic markers evaluated in newborn screening.

Methods

The study was register-based and included full-term singletons born in Iceland from 2009 to 2012 with newborn screening samples taken 72–96 h after birth. Three groups based on birth weight were compared: low birth weight (<2500 g), appropriate-for-gestational age, and extreme macrosomia (≥5000 g). The comparison was adjusted for possible confounding factors.

Results

Compared to appropriate-for-gestational age neonates, both low birth weight and extreme macrosomia were associated with higher levels of glutamic acid. The amino acids alanine and threonine were increased in low birth weight neonates. Free carnitine and some medium- and long-chain acylcarnitines were higher in low birth weight infants. Hydroxybutyrylcarnitine was lower in low birth weight infants, but higher in extremely macrosomic neonates. Acetylcarnitine was higher in low birth weight and extremely macrosomic neonates. Succinylcarnitine was lower and hexadecenoylcarnitine higher in macrosomic newborns.

Conclusion

Low birth weight and extremely macrosomic neonates show distinctive differences in their metabolomic profile compared to appropriate-for-gestational age newborns. The differences are not explained by gestational age.

Impact

  • The key message of this article is that both low birth weight and extremely macrosomic newborns show dissimilar metabolomic profiles compared to appropriate-for-gestational age neonates.

  • The article contributes to knowledge on what affects evaluation of results in newborn screening.

  • The impact of this article is to provide information on metabolism at both ends of the birth weight range after accounting for confounding factors including gestational age.

This is a preview of subscription content

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

$32.00

All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: Comparison of the study results to the CLIR cumulative reference intervals.
Fig. 2: Amino acids compared between EM (blue), AGA (orange) and LBW (purple).
Fig. 3: Acylcarnitines compared between EM (blue), AGA (orange) and LBW (purple).

References

  1. Almannai, M., Marom, R. & Sutton, V. R. Newborn screening: a review of history, recent advancements, and future perspectives in the era of next generation sequencing. Curr. Opin. Pediatr. 28, 694–699 (2016).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Clark, R. H., Kelleher, A. S., Chace, D. H. & Spitzer, A. R. Gestational age and age at sampling influence metabolic profiles in premature infants. Pediatrics 134, e37–e46 (2014).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Vieira Neto, E. et al. Analysis of acylcarnitine profiles in umbilical cord blood and during the early neonatal period by electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry. Braz. J. Med. Biol. Res. 45, 546–556 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ryckman, K. K., Berberich, S. L., Shchelochkov, O. A., Cook, D. E. & Murray, J. C. Clinical and environmental influences on metabolic biomarkers collected for newborn screening. Clin. Biochem. 46, 133–138 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gucciardi, A. et al. Analysis and interpretation of acylcarnitine profiles in dried blood spot and plasma of preterm and full-term newborns. Pediatr. Res. 77, 36–47 (2015).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Yang, L., Zhang, Y., Yang, J. & Huang, X. Effects of birth weight on profiles of dried blood amino-acids and acylcarnitines. Ann. Clin. Biochem. 55, 92–99 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Butte, N. F. et al. Global metabolomic profiling targeting childhood obesity in the Hispanic population. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 102, 256–267 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhao, X. et al. Using metabolomic profiles as biomarkers for insulin resistance in childhood obesity: a systematic review. J. Diabetes Res. 2016, 1–12 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Guasch-Ferré, M. et al. Metabolomics in prediabetes and diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetes Care 39, 833–846 (2016).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Menni, C. et al. Biomarkers for Type 2 diabetes and impaired fasting glucose using a nontargeted metabolomics approach. Diabetes 62, 4270–4276 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Donovan, B., Fleener, D., Bedell, B., Borowski, K. & Ryckman, K. Pregnancy-related changes of amino acid and acylcarnitine concentrations: the impact of obesity. Am. J. Perinatol. Rep. 06, e329–e336 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kadakia, R. et al. Cord blood metabolites associated with newborn adiposity and hyperinsulinemia. J. Pediatrics 203, 144–9.e1 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Class, Q. A., Rickert, M. E., Lichtenstein, P. & D’Onofrio, B. M. Birth weight, physical morbidity, and mortality: a population-based sibling-comparison study. Am. J. Epidemiol. 179, 550–558 (2014).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kramer, M. S. Determinants of low birth weight: methodological assessment and meta-analysis. Bull. World Health Organ. 65, 663–737 (1987).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ Committee on Practice Bulletins—Obstetrics. Practice Bulletin No. 173: Fetal macrosomia. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 128, e195–e209 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Alsunnari, S. et al. Obstetric outcome of extreme macrosomia. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Can. 27, 323–328 (2005).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Anoon, S. S., Rizk, D. E. E. & Ezimokhai, M. Obstetric outcome of excessively overgrown fetuses (>= 5000 g): a case-control study. J. Perinat. Med. 31, 295–301 (2003).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hammami, M., Walters, J. C., Hockman, E. M. & Koo, W. W. Disproportionate alterations in body composition of large for gestational age neonates. J. Pediatr. 138, 817–821 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lee, W. et al. The relationship of newborn adiposity to fetal growth outcome based on birth weight or the modified neonatal growth assessment score. J. Matern. Fetal Neonatal Med. 25, 1933–1940 (2012).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Boulet, S. L., Alexander, G. R., Salihu, H. M. & Pass, M. Macrosomic births in the united states: determinants, outcomes, and proposed grades of risk. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 188, 1372–1378 (2003).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Vidarsdottir, H., Geirsson, R. T., Hardardottir, H., Valdimarsdottir, U. & Dagbjartsson, A. Obstetric and neonatal risks among extremely macrosomic babies and their mothers. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 204, 423.e1–6 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Koyanagi, A. et al. Macrosomia in 23 developing countries: an analysis of a multicountry, facility-based, cross-sectional survey. Lancet 381, 476–483 (2013).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Bjorstad, A. R., Irgens-Hansen, K., Daltveit, A. K. & Irgens, L. M. Macrosomia: mode of delivery and pregnancy outcome. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 89, 664–669 (2010).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kain, J., Corvalan, C., Lera, L., Galvan, M. & Uauy, R. Accelerated growth in early life and obesity in preschool Chilean children. Obesity 17, 1603–1608 (2009).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Cnattingius, S., Villamor, E., Lagerros, Y. T., Wikström, A. K. & Granath, F. High birth weight and obesity-a vicious circle across generations. Int. J. Obes. 36, 1320–1324 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Sparano, S. et al. Being macrosomic at birth is an independent predictor of overweight in children: results from the IDEFICS study. Matern. Child Health J. 17, 1373–1381 (2013).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Sigurbjornsdottir, H. B. & Gunnarsdottir, B. E. Brjóstagjöf og næring ungbarna á Íslandi sem fædd eru 2004–2008 [Breastfeeding and Nutrition for Infants in Iceland Born in 2004–2008] (Directorate of Health in Iceland, 2012).

  28. McHugh, D. et al. Clinical validation of cutoff target ranges in newborn screening of metabolic disorders by tandem mass spectrometry: a worldwide collaborative project. Genet. Med. 13, 230–254 (2011).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Bahn, C. Raising the bar on newborn screening test performance, July 24, 2017 (ed. Mayo Clinic Laboratories) https://news.mayocliniclabs.com/2017/07/24/raising-the-bar-on-newborn-screening-test-performance/ (2017).

  30. Statistics Iceland. Live births and late fetal deaths by sex 1951–2018 http://www.statice.is/. (2019).

  31. Biering, G., Snædal, G., Sigvaldason, H., Ragnarsson, J. & Geirsson, R. T. Size at birth in Iceland. Acta Paediatr. Scand. 319, 68–73 (1985).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Magi, S., Piccirillo, S. & Amoroso, S. The dual face of glutamate: from a neurotoxin to a potential survival factor-metabolic implications in health and disease. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 76, 1473–88. (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Walker, M. C. & van der Donk, W. A. The many roles of glutamate in metabolism. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 43, 419–430 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Adeva-Andany, M. M., Perez-Felpete, N., Fernandez-Fernandez, C., Donapetry-Garcia, C. & Pazos-Garcia, C. Liver glucose metabolism in humans. Biosci. Rep. 36, e00416-e (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Rui, L. Energy metabolism in the liver. Comp. Physiol. 4, 177–197 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Holm, M. B. et al. Uptake and release of amino acids in the fetal-placental unit in human pregnancies. PLoS ONE 12, e0185760 (2017).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Sanchez-Pintos, P. et al. Similarities between acylcarnitine profiles in large for gestational age newborns and obesity. Sci. Rep. 7, 16267 (2017).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Barker, D. J. et al. Type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus, hypertension and hyperlipidaemia (syndrome X): relation to reduced fetal growth. Diabetologia 36, 62–67 (1993).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Yu, Z. B. et al. Birth weight and subsequent risk of obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes. Rev. 12, 525–542 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

H.V. has received a doctoral grant from the University of Iceland Doctoral Grants Fund. Other authors have no financial support to disclose.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors have met the Pediatric Research authorship requirements.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Leifur Franzson.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vidarsdottir, H., Thorkelsson, T., Halldorsson, T.I. et al. Does metabolomic profile differ with regard to birth weight?. Pediatr Res 89, 1144–1151 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41390-020-1033-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41390-020-1033-0

Further reading

Search

Quick links