LED-phototherapy does not induce oxidative DNA damage in hyperbilirubinemic Gunn rats



Phototherapy (PT) is the standard treatment of neonatal unconjugated hyperbilirubinemia. Fluorescent tube (FT)-emitted PT light is known to induce oxidative DNA damage in neonates. Nowadays, however, FTs have largely been replaced by light-emitting diodes (LEDs) for delivering PT. Until now, it is unknown whether LED-PT causes oxidative DNA damage. We aim to determine whether LED-PT induces oxidative DNA damage in hyperbilirubinemic rats.


Adult Gunn rats, with genetically unconjugated hyperbilirubinemia, received LED-PT in the clinically relevant doses of 10 or 30 µW/cm2/nm. Urine was collected at 0, 24, and 48 h of PT. A group of young Gunn rats received intensive LED-PT of 100 µW/cm2/nm for 24 h. Urine was collected every 8 h and analyzed for the levels of oxidative DNA damage marker 8-hydroxy-2’deoxyguanosine (8-OHdG) and creatinine. DNA damage was evaluated by immunohistochemistry (γH2AX) of skin and spleen samples.


LED-PT of 10 and 30 µW/cm2/nm did not affect urinary concentrations of 8-OHdG and creatinine or the 8-OHdG/creatinine ratio. Likewise, intensive LED-PT did not affect the 8-OHdG/creatinine ratio or the number of γH2AX-positive cells in the skin or spleen.


Our results show that LED-PT does not induce oxidative DNA damage in hyperbilirubinemic Gunn rats either at clinically relevant or intensive dosages.


Bilirubin is a potentially neurotoxic metabolite. Severe unconjugated hyperbilirubinemia is associated with the development of kernicterus, resulting in permanent neurological damage or even death. Unconjugated hyperbilirubinemia occurs primarily in premature infants and the majority of infants with a gestational age <32 weeks is treated with phototherapy (PT).1

PT, which has been the standard therapy for unconjugated hyperbilirubinemia for over 60 years, converts unconjugated bilirubin (UCB) to structural and configurational photo-isomers that can be more readily secreted by the liver into the bile, and to a lesser extent, by the kidneys into urine.2 PT is assumed to be relatively safe and its widespread use has contributed to the decreased need for exchange transfusions.3 Some studies, however, have suggested an increased mortality risk by PT, especially in sick (extremely) low birth weight (E)LBW infants.4 Furthermore, in recent years, associations have been reported between PT in neonatal life and diseases occurring later in life, such as diabetes, asthma, epilepsy, and even childhood cancer.5,6,7

Known cancer-inducing agents, such as tobacco and ultraviolet (UV) radiation, exert their toxic effects partially by induction of oxidative stress and oxidative DNA damage. When oxidative DNA damage exceeds the repair capacity, permanent DNA changes occur. Preterm infants are known to be predisposed to several oxidative stress-mediated diseases (e.g., bronchopulmonary dysplasia and retinopathy of prematurity).8 Preterm infants are particularly susceptible to oxidative damage due to significantly lower antioxidant concentrations at birth.9 Both the endogenous production and the materno-fetal placental transfer of antioxidants only occur in the last term of pregnancy. The ability of preterms to produce antioxidants in response to oxidant challenges remains deficient in the postnatal period.9 It has even been suggested that mild jaundice has a physiologic function through the protective effects of UCB, which is a proven antioxidant, at least in vitro and in blood.10 In this way, mildly jaundiced infants could be protected against oxidative stressors, such as, e.g., oxygen treatment8 or potentially PT. However, severe hyperbilirubinemia induces oxidative stress and bilirubin-induced neurotoxicity in the brain.11,12,13,14 These arguments underline the importance of studying these stressors in a hyperbilirubinemic environment.

PT has been associated with increased lipid peroxidation in (E)LBW neonates, which could be the result of increased oxidative stress.15 Several studies show induced DNA damage in white blood cells (WBCs) after PT.16,17 In these studies, PT light has been emitted by fluorescent tubes (FTs), whereas currently used PT devices are often equipped with light-emitting diodes (LEDs). LED-PT allows much higher intensity treatment with less heat production. Recently, intensive LED-PT with an irradiance intensity >60 µW/cm2/nm has been applied for treating unconjugated hyperbilirubinemia in preterm infants and has proved to be highly effective.18 Until now, however, it has never been investigated whether LED-PT causes oxidative stress and DNA damage, especially when administered at these now available intensive dosages. This knowledge gap and concerns on the safety of high-intensity LED-PT have impeded its clinical implementation. Here we aim to establish whether LED-PT induces oxidative DNA damage in hyperbilirubinemic Gunn rats at either conventional or at intensive treatment intensities.



Homozygous adult Gunn rats (Gunn-UGT1A1j/BluHsdRrrc), which are genetically deficient of the bilirubin conjugation enzyme UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 1A1, and wild-type (WT) littermates were obtained from the Rat Resource & Research Center (Columbia, MO) and bred at the University Medical Center Groningen breeding colony (Groningen, The Netherlands). During all experiments, rats were allowed ad libitum access to water and RM3 diet (Special Diets Services, Essex, UK). Animals were kept in an environmentally controlled facility with a 12-h day/night cycle. All experiments were approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of the University Medical Center Groningen.

Study design

Conventional clinical PT intensity experiment

Gunn rats and WT rats (n = 10 and n = 8 per group, respectively, 20–25 weeks of age) were individually placed in a urine collection cage for 30 min. After the collection of minimal 200 µl urine, animals were anesthetized using isoflurane, shaved on their back and flanks, and 100 µl blood was collected from tail vein cut. Subsequently, the rats were group-housed in a conventional cage placed under a mavi LED® Phototherapy System (Inspiration Healthcare, Crawley, UK) (wavelength range 450–520 nm, peak 450–470 nm) for 24 h. Intensities were measured at the bottom of the cage and set on 10 or 30 µW/cm2/nm, respectively. After 24 h of PT, new blood and urine samples were collected as described above.

Intensive PT experiment

Gunn rats (n = 6 per group, 8 weeks of age) were individually placed on a grid in a metabolic cage for 24 h, with water and chow ad libitum. After a 24 h acclimatization period, the rats were anesthetized using isoflurane, shaved on their back and flanks, and 100 µl blood was collected from the tail vein. Depending on the group, animals were put under a LED-PT device of 100 µW/cm2/nm (kindly provided by Professor Henk Vreman, Stanford University, Stanford, CA; 100 µW group) (wavelength range 416–544 nm, peak 467 nm) or left anesthetized for 20 min (Control group). As a positive control, these young Gunn rats were radiated with 3.5 Gy of γ-radiation. This sublethal dose is known to induce both 8-OHdG in urine and γH2AX in mice.19,20 After anesthesia, the rats were placed in the urine collection cage for another 24 h. The 100 µW group was placed in the urine collection cage with a PT lamp placed on top, intensity was measured to be 100 µW in the entire cage, using a Biliblanket Lightmeter II (GE Healthcare, Madison, WI). Urine samples were collected every 8 h. After 24 h, animals were anesthetized using isoflurane. Blood was collected from the tail vein and the liver, spleen and skin were collected and stored in 4% formaldehyde for 24 h before processing. Subsequently, rats were terminated by decapitation under anesthesia.

Urinary 8-hydroxy-2’deoxyguanosine (8-OHdG)

8-OHdG is the breakdown product of guanine, the most oxidative-stress-susceptible base in DNA. 8-OHdG appears only after oxidative DNA damage and is quantitatively excreted into urine. Consequently, 8-OHdG is not only a non-invasive marker for oxidative stress but is also specific for oxidative-stress-induced DNA damage.21 Two hundred µl of urine was transferred to a 96-well plate and 300 µl internal standard (25 ng/ml 8-OHdG-15N5 in 50 mM NH4Ac, pH 4.7) was added to each well. After vortexing for 1 min, samples were transferred to an Oasis HLB SPE column (Waters, Millford, MA), preconditioned with 1 ml MeOH and 1 ml 50 mM NH4Ac, pH 4.7 buffer, and vacuum was applied using N2 gas. The column was washed with 500 µl buffer and the sample was eluted in 500 µl MeOH. Subsequently, the eluate was evaporated under N2 gas at 50 °C for 15 min and redissolved in 200 µl 80% acetonitrile. 8-OHdG was measured by liquid chromatography and isotope dilution tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Ten µl of the sample solution was injected into the LC-MS/MS instrument. Chromatography was performed using a XBridge Amide column (50 × 3.0 mm, 2.5 µm, Waters) and mass spectrometric detection by a XEVO TQ-MS (Waters).

Urinary creatinine analysis

Urinary creatinine was enzymatically determined by the general diagnostics laboratory in the UMCG, using a Roch/Hitachi Cobas C 501 analyzer (Hoffman-La Roche, Basel, Switzerland/Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan). For each urine sample, the 8-OHdG concentration was divided by the creatinine concentration to obtain the 8-OHdG/creatinine ratio. Thereby, the 8-OHdG concentration was corrected for urine osmolality. For clarity, the 8-OHdG concentration is displayed in ng/ml and the creatinine concentration in mmol/l. The ratio is displayed in µg/g creatinine, which is calculated by dividing the 8-OHdG concentration in ng/ml by the creatinine concentration in g/l (concentration in mmol/l multiplied by 0.11312).


γH2AX is a phosphorylated histone protein, which appears at the site of double-strand DNA breaks (DSBs) as soon as DNA repair is initiated. γH2AX is a widely used DNA damage marker in tissues for research purposes and is more sensitive than conventional assays (e.g., Comet assay, neutral elution or two-dimensional gel electrophoresis).22 Four-µm paraffin-embedded tissue sections were dried for 1 h at 55 °C. Sections were deparaffinized in xylene and rehydrated in a graded series of alcohol. The antigen retrieval was performed using 1 mM EDTA/10 mM Tris-HCL buffer, pH 9, in a microwave and sections were left to cool to room temperature. Endogenous peroxidase activity was blocked with 1% H2O2 in methanol for 30 min. The unspecific antigens on tissues were blocked in 10% normal goat serum for 30 min. Then the sections were incubated with primary antibody (rabbit anti H2AX (s139) (20E3), Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA) at 4 °C overnight and incubated with biotinylated goat-anti-rabbit secondary antibody (biotinylated Goat Anti-Rabbit IgG Antibody, BA-1000, Vector Laboratories, Peterborough, UK) at 1:250 for 30 min at room temperature. After 30-min incubation with Avidin-biotin ABC complex (PK-4000, Vector), the sections were washed and colorized with 3,3′-diaminobenzidine (Sigma, D5637) for 10 min and counterstained with hematoxylin. Positive cells were manually counted using ImageJ Cell Counter Plugin (National Institute of Health, Bethesda, MD) analyzing pictures of 10 randomly selected high- power fields (×40) for each sample. We analyzed γH2AX in a superficial tissue, skin, and an internal tissue, spleen. We chose spleen because it is the main site of WBC sequestration and previous studies have shown that FT-PT causes DNA damage in WBCs.


Blood was collected in EDTA-coated capillaries and kept in EDTA-coated tubes (MiniCollect, Greiner Bio-One, Kremsmünster, Austria) in the dark till centrifugation. Plasma was stored under argon in amber-colored containers at −80 °C, till analysis. Bilirubin was quantified using the colorimetric diazo method, using a Roch/Hitachi Cobas C 501 analyzer.


Paired comparisons were tested for significance using Wilcoxon rank test. Unpaired comparisons were statistically tested using Mann–Whitney U analysis. Significance was considered reached at p < 0.05. Statistical tests were performed using GraphPad Prism 6.0 (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA).


LED-PT does not increase markers of oxidative DNA damage at conventional intensities

To assess the effect of LED-PT on oxidative DNA damage, we treated Gunn rats with 2 commonly used PT doses 10 (low intensity) and 30 µW/cm2/nm (high intensity), respectively. Figure 1 shows that neither low (Fig. 1a–c) nor high (Fig. 1e–g) intensity PT increased the levels of 8-OHdG and creatinine or the 8-OHdG/creatinine ratio. As expected, PT did significantly decrease the levels of plasma total bilirubin (TB) after 48 h by 12% and by 22% at low and high intensities, respectively (Fig. 1d–h).

Fig. 1

Conventional phototherapy (PT) intensities do not induce the 8-hydroxy-2’deoxyguanosine (8-OHdG)/creatinine ratio. a The 8-OHdG/creatinine ratio before and after 24 and 48 h low-intensity PT of 10 µW/cm2/nm. b The urinary 8-OHdG concentration before and after 24 and 48 h low-intensity PT. c The urinary creatinine concentration before and after 24 and 48 h low-intensity PT. d Total bilirubin (TB) before and after 24 and 48 h low-intensity PT. e The 8-OHdG/creatinine ratio before and after 24 and 48 h high-intensity PT of 30 µW/cm2/nm. f The urinary 8-OHdG concentration before and after 24 and 48 h high-intensity PT. g The urinary creatinine concentration before and after 24 and 48 h high intensity PT. h TB before and after 24 and 48 h high-intensity PT. (error bars represent standard deviation (SD)) *p < 0.05

Intensive PT does not induce oxidative DNA damage

Intensive PT with intensities up to 100 µW/cm2/nm are increasingly being applied in research settings not only in neonates but also in patients with Crigler–Najjar type 1.18 To assess its potential toxicity, we studied the effects of intensive LED-PT of 100 µW/cm2/nm. Intensive PT did not affect the 8-OHdG/creatinine ratio at 24 h (Fig. 2a) or at any earlier time point (Fig. S1). Interestingly, we found significantly lower 8-OHdG/creatinine levels in PT-treated rats as compared to control rats, but the 8-OHdG/creatinine ratios in PT rats were not significantly decreased when compared to their starting levels. The absence of any PT effect on these internal controls makes this a probable coincidental finding. We did observe a significant induction of both urinary 8-OHdG and creatinine (Fig. 2b, c), indicating that urine becomes more concentrated upon PT treatment. This increase was not observed in the control group. In order to explain the increased urine creatinine concentration in the PT group, we monitored water intake, food intake, urine volume, and body weight. PT significantly decreased food and water intake, resulting in a significantly lower urine production (Fig. S2), leading to more concentrated urine with a higher creatinine concentration. Intensive PT strongly decreased TB concentration (by 85% at 24 h) to a mean plasma concentration of 5.8 µmol/l, which is within the physiological range of adult humans.

Fig. 2

Intensive phototherapy (PT) does not induce the 8-hydroxy-2’deoxyguanosine (8-OHdG)/creatinine ratio or γH2AX in tissue. a The 8-OHdG/creatinine ratio before and after 24 h intensive PT of 100 µW/cm2/nm or control interventions. b The urinary 8-OHdG concentration before and after 24 h intensive PT or control interventions. c The urinary creatinine concentration before and after 24 h intensive PT or control interventions. d Total bilirubin before and after 24 h intensive PT or control interventions. e The number of γH2AX-positive cells in the skin after 24 h intensive PT or control interventions (average number of cells in 10 manually counted high-power fields (HPFs)). f The number of γH2AX-positive foci in the spleen after 24 h intensive PT or control interventions (average number of cells in 10 manually counted HPFs). (error bars represent SD) *p < 0.05

In addition to urinary analyses, we determined a parameter of DNA damage in tissue. Figure 2e shows the number of γH2AX-positive cells in the skin of intensive PT-treated and control rats. Unexpectedly, we observed a significant decrease of γH2AX-positive cells in PT-treated rats. Most γH2AX-positive cells were found in the follicular epithelium. In the spleen, PT did not affect the number of γH2AX-positive cells (Fig. 2f). As a positive control, we show that 3.5 Gy γ-radiation caused a significant 86-fold increase in γH2AX foci, as well as a significant increase in the 8-OHdG/creatinine ratio (Fig. S3).

Serum bilirubin concentration does not correlate with the urinary 8-OHdG/creatinine ratio

To assess a potential anti-oxidative effect of bilirubin, we compared the basal 8-OHdG/creatinine ratio between Gunn and WT rats. We observed no difference in the ratio and 8-OHdG or creatinine concentration (Fig. 3). When comparing the basal bilirubin levels of the old and the young Gunn rats, however, we observed a significantly higher 8-OHdG/creatinine ratio in the latter (Fig. 3d). Upon closer examination of the separate ratio constituents, both the 8-OHdG and creatinine concentration were increased in young Gunn rats (Fig. 3e, f). Importantly, we observed no correlation between the ratio and TB at low intensity, high intensity, or intensive PT (Fig. 3h–j).

Fig. 3

The urinary 8-hydroxy-2’deoxyguanosine (8-OHdG)/creatinine ratio is not affected by bilirubin but decreases with age. a The 8-OHdG/creatinine ratio in Gunn rats versus wild-type (WT) rats. b The urinary 8-OHdG concentration in Gunn rats versus WT rats. c The urinary creatinine concentration in Gunn rats versus WT rats. d The 8-OHdG/creatinine ratio in old (20–25 weeks) versus young (8 weeks) Gunn rats. e The urinary 8-OHdG concentration in old versus young Gunn rats. f The urinary creatinine concentration in old versus young Gunn rats. g The mean total bilirubin (TB) level in old versus young Gunn rats. h Correlation between the 8-OHdG/creatinine ratio and TB in Gunn rats treated with 10 µW/cm2/nm (r2 = 0.004, p = 0.754). i Correlation between the 8-OHdG/creatinine ratio and TB in Gunn rats treated with 30 µW/cm2/nm (r2 = 0.022, p = 0.389). j Correlation between the 8-OHdG/creatinine ratio and TB in Gunn rats treated with 100 µW/cm2/nm (r2 = 0.074, p = 0.392). (error bars represent SD) *p < 0.05


We are the first to demonstrate that LED-PT up to 100 µW/cm2/nm, an intensity that exceeds conventional FT-PT, does not induce oxidative DNA damage in hyperbilirubinemic Gunn rats.

We used two markers that are directly correlated with DNA damage. 8-OHdG is the direct oxidation product of the DNA base guanine, the most susceptible DNA base, and is therefore directly correlated with DNA oxidation. 8-OHdG is a non-invasive marker, which allows not only serial measurements over time but will also allow us to extend our study to a clinical setting with preterm neonates, in which the options of obtaining invasive samples (blood, tissues) are limited.

Because the 8-OHdG/creatinine ratio does not show actual DSBs, we added γH2AX as a second marker. γH2AX is a histone protein that is phosphorylated upon activation of the repair mechanism of DSBs. The number of γH2AX-positive cells therefore directly correlates with DNA damage in tissues.22 Unexpectedly, γH2AX was not increased by PT in the skin, the most exposed tissue to PT. Instead, PT significantly decreased the number of γH2AX-positive cells. Although we have no explanation for this unexpected decrease, there could be a direct effect of LED light on the hair follicle, as most γ-H2AX-positive cells are found in the follicular epithelium. LED light is known to promote hair regrowth and to increase hair tensile strength, which is hypothesized to be caused by vasodilation and improved follicular blood supply.23 Possibly, these changes could be accompanied by decreased γH2AX expression. The number of positive cells in the skin, however, was very small in both PT-treated and control animals, making the physiological relevance of this effect questionable.

We also analyzed DNA damage in the spleen, because it is an important organ in WBC sequestration and previous studies have shown DNA damage in WBCs. We, however, did not find an effect of PT on γH2AX. We hypothesize that this difference can be explained by our use of LED-PT versus conventional FT-PT, which has been used in virtually all currently available studies on this topic. Although FT devices have been commonly used in the past, clinically they are gradually being replaced by LED devices. LED-PT has been proven to be as effective as or superior to FT-PT.24 Our present data indicate that the high efficacy of LED-PT does not concur with indications of (more) oxidative stress. There are several reasons why FT-PT can be expected to cause more oxidative stress and DNA damage than LED-PT. First, the heat produced by FTs can induce hyperthermia, which is known to enhance oxidative stress.25 Second, FTs primarily produce UV light, which is subsequently converted to visible light by the internal phosphor coating. Several studies have described leakage of UV light from FTs, especially when the coating wears off and becomes damaged over time.26,27 This could theoretically lead to a clinically significant UV exposure, especially when the newborn infant is placed close to the lamp. Compared to LEDs, FTs need to be placed closer, due to the relatively lower irradiance of the emitted light, which could aggravate the exposure to UV.28 To protect from UV exposure, FT-based PT devices need to be used with a protective screen to absorb UV radiation. However, most studies do not report on the use of such a screen, and in practice, the screens may be removed after a certain time because they get dirty or damaged or because the protective role of the screens is not realized. Our study was performed with unfiltered LED light. Finally, FTs emit a broader wavelength of light compared to LEDs, and FTs emit several high irradiance peaks at different wavelengths. Although these are not visible by eye, these different wavelength peaks can potentially cause side effects, including the previously reported induction of oxidative stress or DNA damage. The blue LED spectrum, on the other hand, is narrower and does not have high irradiance peaks at wavelengths other than blue.29

There are two conflicting studies comparing conventional FT and LED-PT with regards to oxidative stress in term neonates. Demirel et al. describe an enhanced oxidative stress index after FT-PT but not after LED-PT. In contrast, Kale et al. describes increased oxidative stress after both FT and LED-PT.30,31 In both studies, different treatment intensities are used for FT-PT (12–16 and 10–15 µW/cm2/nm by Demirel and Kale, respectively) and LED-PT (30 and 60–90 µW/cm2/nm by Demirel and Kale, respectively), making any comparison difficult. Furthermore, both assess oxidative stress by measuring the total oxidant status (TOS) and total antioxidant capacity (TAC) in plasma by two colorimetric assays designed by Erel et al. From these two variables, the TOS:TAC ratio was calculated, representing the oxidative stress index. However, the validity of these assays can be questioned for this specific research question, since the methodological paper of the TOS assay describes interference of bilirubin with the assay.32 Moreover, since bilirubin is known to act as an antioxidant in blood, this could potentially affect TAC. PT could therefore hypothetically affect the oxidative stress index merely by decreasing plasma bilirubin. In our study, we circumvented these interactions by determining the physiologically relevant effect of oxidative stress, i.e., oxidative DNA damage, using markers that are only produced upon DNA damage. One other study reports on the effect of different colors of PT on 8-OHdG/creatinine in Gunn rats and concludes that blue PT causes a two-fold induction, whereas all other colors did not cause any significant change. However, since the induction is only shown in two rats without optimal controls, this methodology is questionable.33

To study the effect of hyperbilirubinemia on 8-OHdG production in our model, we compared the basal 8-OHdG/creatinine ratio between age-matched Gunn rats and WT rats and we found no difference in the ratio or urinary 8-OHdG and creatinine concentrations. Some studies have reported that bilirubin has antioxidant properties in vivo, which are hypothesized to be responsible for the inverse association between bilirubin and cardiovascular risk. However, the causality of these associations has been disputed, because the data have largely been obtained from either normobilirubinemic patients or from patients with Gilbert syndrome.34 The latter not only have mildly elevated bilirubin levels but also tend to be slimmer, with a metabolically more favorable phenotype, which could by itself decrease oxidative stress.35 High bilirubin levels, however, have been suggested to be toxic for cells and could thereby induce oxidative stress, at least when exceeding a cytotoxic threshold.36,37 This is especially true for brain, where bilirubin can cause profound neurotoxicity.11,12,13,14 Nevertheless, in our model bilirubin did not affect the urinary 8-OHdG/creatinine ratio, indicating Gunn rats do not display altered sensitivity to oxidative stress.

Interestingly, when comparing old and young Gunn rats, we observed a significantly higher 8-OHdG/creatinine ratio in young Gunn rats. This seems counterintuitive, since oxidative damage is known to increase with age.38 One should be cautious, however, to compare Gunn rats of different ages for two reasons. First, creatinine is produced upon the breakdown of muscle cells and is therefore known to depend on muscle mass and age. As the muscle mass of rats changes with age, creatinine production also alters and so does the 8-OHdG/creatinine ratio. In addition to being a marker of urine osmolality, creatinine is also a marker of kidney function. The excretion and urinary levels of creatinine decrease when kidney function decreases. Gunn rats are known to suffer from bilirubin nephropathy, a progressively declining kidney function caused by the accumulation of bilirubin deposits in the kidney tissue.39 Therefore, their kidney function is expected to decline with age, which could affect the excretion of creatinine and possibly 8-OHdG.


A limitation of this study is the fact that our urinary marker depends on kidney function. However, we corrected for kidney function by expressing DNA damage as the ratio of 8-OHdG over urinary creatinine. As the oxidative DNA damage marker, we chose to include γ-H2AX, but we did not include other oxidative stress or DNA damage markers, e.g., products of lipid or protein oxidation. Furthermore, our work does not contain a direct comparison between FT- and LED-PT. Also, we did not include γ-radiation or PT treatment for WT rats, since their basal 8-OHdG/creatinine was not altered compared to Gunn rats. In addition, although neonatal hyperbilirubinemia primarily occurs in preterm infants, we chose to perform this study in adult rats, instead of neonates. During the first postnatal week, when neonatal rats are still hairless, they depend on the warmth of their littermates and mother for their body heat and require almost continuous feeding. Administering accurate, reproducible, continuous PT would require separating the litter from each other and their mother, inducing stress, hypothermia, and food deprivation, all of which could induce oxidative stress. Lastly, owing to animal welfare considerations, this work only studied the effects of PT after the first 24–48 h of treatment. Although we do not observe any effects during this initial period, we cannot exclude potential side effects after longer PT exposure.

To our knowledge, this is the first study that dose-dependently determined the effects of LED-PT on oxidative DNA damage, including effects of intensive PT intensities up to 100 µW/cm2/nm. These intensities are gaining clinical relevance, since more and more trials are studying the efficacy of intensive PT.18 Higher-intensity PT leads to a significantly faster and larger bilirubin decrease than conventional treatment intensities. Shortening the duration of PT and enhancing the speed of bilirubin removal may have several theoretical advantages, including shorter exposure of the infant to toxic bilirubin levels, potentially less need for exchange transfusion, shorter hospitalization, and less interference in the mother–child interaction. Clinical implementation, however, has so far been impeded by concerns about DNA damage and previously reported long-term effects, including a tendency toward increased mortality in (E)LBW. This has led to studies analyzing the effects of intermittent PT and studies that investigate the effects of additional therapies next to PT.40 Notwithstanding this important research, our work indicates that LED-PT does not cause oxidative DNA damage in hyperbilirubinemic rats and thereby may mitigate the previously raised concerns regarding that particular matter. Our study, however, does not exclude potential other harmful effects that could affect previously reported long-term adverse effects. Finally, it remains to be established whether our findings apply to preterm infants.


  1. 1.

    Dennery, P. A., Seidman, D. S. & Stevenson, D. K. Neonatal hyperbilirubinemia. N. Engl. J. Med. 344, 581–590 (2001).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Maisels, M. J. & McDonagh, A. F. Phototherapy for neonatal jaundice. N. Engl. J. Med. 358, 920–928 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Brown, A. K., Kim, M. H., Wu, P. Y. & Bryla, D. A. Efficacy of phototherapy in prevention and management of neonatal hyperbilirubinemia. Pediatrics 75, 393–400 (1985).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Arnold, C., Pedroza, C. & Tyson, J. E. Phototherapy in ELBW newborns: does it work? Is it safe? Evid. Random. Clin. Trials 38, 452–464 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Dahlquist, G. & Kallen, B. Indications that phototherapy is a risk factor for insulin-dependent diabetes. Diabetes Care 26, 247–248 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Maimburg, R. D., Olsen, J. & Sun, Y. Neonatal hyperbilirubinemia and the risk of febrile seizures and childhood epilepsy. Epilepsy Res. 124, 67–72 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Wickremasinghe, A. C., Kuzniewicz, M. W., Grimes, B. A., McCulloch, C. E. & Newman, T. B. Neonatal phototherapy and infantile cancer. Pediatrics https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2015-1353 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Torres-Cuevas, I., Parra-Llorca, A. & Sánchez-Illana, A. Oxygen and oxidative stress in the perinatal period. Redox Biol. 12, 674–681 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Davis, J. M. & Auten, R. L. Maturation of the antioxidant system and the effects on preterm birth. Semin. Fetal Neonatal Med. 15, 191–195 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Stocker, R. Antioxidant activities of bile pigments. Antioxid. Redox Signal 6, 841–849 (2004).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Fujiwara, R., Nguyen, N., Chen, S. & Tukey, R. H. Developmental hyperbilirubinemia and CNS toxicity in mice humanized with the UDP glucuronosyltransferase 1 (UGT1) locus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107, 5024–5029 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Bortolussi, G. et al. Age-dependent pattern of cerebellar susceptibility to bilirubin neurotoxicity in vivo in mice. Dis. Model Mech. 7, 1057–1068 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Barateiro, A. et al. Reduced myelination and increased glia reactivity resulting from severe neonatal hyperbilirubinemia. Mol. Pharmacol. 89, 84–93 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Rawat, V., Bortolussi, G., Gazzin, S., Tiribelli, C. & Muro, A. F. Bilirubin-induced oxidative stress leads to DNA damage in the cerebellum of hyperbilirubinemic neonatal mice and activates DNA double-strand break repair pathways in human cells. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 1801243, 11 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Gathwala, G. & Sharma, S. Phototherapy induces oxidative stress in premature neonates. Indian J. Gastroenterol. 21, 153–154 (2002).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Tatli, M. M., Minnet, C., Kocyigit, A. & Karadag, A. Phototherapy increases DNA damage in lymphocytes of hyperbilirubinemic neonates. Mutat. Res. 654, 93–95 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Yahia, S. et al. Influence of hyperbilirubinemia and phototherapy on markers of genotoxicity and apoptosis in full-term infants. Eur. J. Pediatr. 174, 459–464 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Donneborg, M., Vandborg, P., Hansen, B., Rodrigo-Domingo, M. & Ebbesen, F. Double versus single intensive phototherapy with LEDs in treatment of neonatal hyperbilirubinemia. J. Perinatol. 38, 154 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Kawai, K., Li, Y. & Kasai, H. Accurate measurement of 8-OH-dG and 8-OH-Gua in mouse DNA, urine and serum: effects of X-ray irradiation. Genes Environ. 29, 107–114 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Horn, S., Barnard, S. & Rothkamm, K. Gamma-H2AX-based dose estimation for whole and partial body radiation exposure. PLoS ONE 6, e25113 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Wu, L. L., Chiou, C., Chang, P. & Wu, J. T. Urinary 8-OHdG: a marker of oxidative stress to DNA and a risk factor for cancer, atherosclerosis and diabetics. Clin. Chim. Acta 339, 1–9 (2004).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Kuo, L. J. & Yang, L. X. Gamma-H2AX - a novel biomarker for DNA double-strand breaks. In Vivo 22, 305–309 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Barolet, D. Light-emitting diodes (LEDs) in dermatology. Semin. Cutan. Med. Surg. 27, 227–238 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Maisels, M., Kring, E. & DeRidder, J. Randomized controlled trial of light-emitting diode phototherapy. J. Perinatol. 27, 565 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Kletkiewicz, H. et al. Effects of body temperature on post-anoxic oxidative stress from the perspective of postnatal physiological adaptive processes in rats. J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 67, 287–299 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Nuzum-Keim, A. & Sontheimer, R. Ultraviolet light output of compact fluorescent lamps: comparison to conventional incandescent and halogen residential lighting sources. Lupus 18, 556–560 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Safari, S., Eshraghi Dehkordy, S., Kazemi, M., Dehghan, H. & Mahaki, B. Ultraviolet radiation emissions and illuminance in different brands of compact fluorescent lamps. Int. J. Photoenergy 2015, 504674 (2015).

  28. 28.

    Moseley, H. & Ferguson, J. The risk to normal and photosensitive individuals from exposure to light from compact fluorescent lamps. Photodermatol. Photoimmunol. Photomed. 27, 131–137 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Vreman, H. J. et al. Light-emitting diodes: a novel light source for phototherapy. Pediatr. Res. 44, 804 (1998).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Demirel, G., Uras, N. & Celik, I. H. Comparison of total oxidant/antioxidant status in unconjugated hyperbilirubinemia of newborn before and after conventional and LED phototherapy: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Clin. Invest. Med. 33, 335–341 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Kale, Y., Aydemir, O. & Celik, Ü. Effects of phototherapy using different light sources on oxidant and antioxidant status of neonates with jaundice. Early Hum. Dev. 89, 957–960 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Erel, O. A new automated colorimetric method for measuring total oxidant status. Clin. Biochem 38, 1103–1111 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Uchida, Y. et al. Phototherapy with blue and green mixed-light is as effective against unconjugated jaundice as blue light and reduces oxidative stress in the Gunn rat model. Early Hum. Dev. 91, 381–385 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Wagner, K. H. et al. Looking to the horizon: the role of bilirubin in the development and prevention of age-related chronic diseases. Clin. Sci. (Lond.) 129, 1 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Bulmer, A. C., Blanchfield, J. T., Toth, I., Fassett, R. G. & Coombes, J. S. Improved resistance to serum oxidation in Gilbert’s syndrome: a mechanism for cardiovascular protection. Atherosclerosis 199, 390–396 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Brito, M. A., Brites, D. & Butterfield, D. A. A link between hyperbilirubinemia, oxidative stress and injury to neocortical synaptosomes. Brain Res. 1026, 33–43 (2004).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Kapitulnik, J. Bilirubin: an endogenous product of heme degradation with both cytotoxic and cytoprotective properties. Mol. Pharmacol. 66, 773–779 (2004).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Finkel, T. & Holbrook, N. J. Oxidants, oxidative stress and the biology of ageing. Nature 408, 239 (2000).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Odell, G. B., Natzschka, J. C. & Storey, G. Bilirubin nephropathy in the Gunn strain of rat. Am. J. Physiol. 212, 931–938 (1967).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Ebbesen, F., Hansen, T. W. & Maisels, M. J. Update on phototherapy in jaundiced neonates. Curr. Pediatr. Rev. 13, 176–180 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


We thank Professor Henk Vreman for kindly providing the intensive LED phototherapy device.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lori W. E. van der Schoor.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

van der Schoor, L.W.E., Hulzebos, C.V., van Faassen, M.H. et al. LED-phototherapy does not induce oxidative DNA damage in hyperbilirubinemic Gunn rats. Pediatr Res 85, 1041–1047 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41390-019-0367-y

Download citation

Further reading


Quick links