Clinical Research Article | Published:

Early childhood curiosity and kindergarten reading and math academic achievement



Although children’s curiosity is thought to be important for early learning, the association of curiosity with early academic achievement has not been tested. We hypothesized that greater curiosity would be associated with greater kindergarten academic achievement in reading and math.


Sample included 6200 children in the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study, Birth Cohort. Measures at kindergarten included direct assessments of reading and math, and a parent-report behavioral questionnaire from which we derived measures of curiosity and effortful control. Multivariate linear regression examined associations of curiosity with kindergarten reading and math academic achievement, adjusting for effortful control and confounders. We also tested for moderation by effortful control, sex, and socioeconomic status (SES).


In adjusted models, greater curiosity was associated with greater kindergarten reading and math academic achievement: breading = 0.11, p < 0.001; bmath = 0.12, p < 0.001. This association was not moderated by effortful control or sex, but was moderated by SES (preading = 0.01; pmath = 0.005). The association of curiosity with academic achievement was greater for children with low SES (breading = 0.18, p < 0.001; bmath = 0.20, p < 0.001), versus high SES (breading = 0.08, p = 0.004; bmath = 0.07, p < 0.001).


Curiosity may be an important, yet under-recognized contributor to academic achievement. Fostering curiosity may optimize academic achievement at kindergarten, especially for children with low SES.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Additional information

Financial Disclosure: None

Category of Study: Clinical Research

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.


  1. 1.

    High, P. C., the Committee on Early Childhood, Adoption, Dependent Care Council on School Health. School Readiness. Pediatrics 121, e1008–e1015 (2008).

  2. 2.

    National Education Goals Panel. The Goal 1 Technical Planning Subgroup Report on School Readiness. (National Education Goals Panel, Washington, DC, 1991).

  3. 3. Early and Middle Childhood Objectives. Available from:

  4. 4.

    Rimm-Kaufman, S. E. & Pianta, R. C. An ecological perspective on the transition to kindergarten: a theoretical framework to guide empirical research. J. Appl. Dev. Psychol. 21, 491–511 (2000).

  5. 5.

    Rimm-Kaufman, S. E., Pianta, R. C. & Cox, M. J. Teachers’ judgments of problems in the transition to kindergarten. Early Child. Res. Q. 15, 147–166 (2000).

  6. 6.

    Abry, T., Latham, S., Bassok, D. & LoCasale-Crouch, J. Preschool and kindergarten teachers’ beliefs about early school competencies: Misalignment matters for kindergarten adjustment. Early Child. Res. Q. 31(Supplement C), 78–88 (2015).

  7. 7.

    Denham, S. A. Social-emotional competence as support for school readiness: what is it and how do we assess it? Early Educ. Dev. 17, 57–89 (2006).

  8. 8.

    Kagan S. L., Moore E., Bredekamp S. National Education Goals Panel: Reconsidering Children’s Early Development and Learning Toward Common Views and Vocabulary. DIANE Publishing, Pennsylvania, 1998.

  9. 9.

    Duncan, G. J. et al. School readiness and later achievement. Dev. Psychol. 43, 1428 (2007).

  10. 10.

    Lee, E. The relationship between approaches to learning and academic achievement among kindergarten students: an analysis using Early Childhood Longitudinal Study Kindergarten students (ECLS-K). Int. J. Arts & Sci. 5, 305 (2012).

  11. 11.

    Li-Grining, C. P., Votruba-Drzal, E., Maldonado-Carreño, C. & Haas, K. Children’s early approaches to learning and academic trajectories through fifth grade. Dev. Psychol. 46, 1062–1077 (2010).

  12. 12.

    Claessens, A., Duncan, G. & Engel, M. Kindergarten skills and fifth-grade achievement: evidence from the ECLS-K. Econ. Educ. Rev. 28, 415–427 (2009).

  13. 13.

    Diamond, A., Barnett, W. S., Thomas, J. & Munro, S. Preschool program improves cognitive control. Science 318, 1387 (2007).

  14. 14.

    Blair, C. & Diamond, A. Biological processes in prevention and intervention: the promotion of self-regulation as a means of preventing school failure. Dev. Psychopathol. 20, 899–911 (2008).

  15. 15.

    Litman, J. A. Interest and deprivation factors of epistemic curiosity. Pers. Individ. Dif. 44, 1585–1595 (2008).

  16. 16.

    Litman, J. Curiosity and the pleasures of learning: Wanting and liking new information. Cogn. Emot. 19, 793–814 (2005).

  17. 17.

    Piaget, J. & Cook, M. The origins of intelligence in children. (W W Norton & Co, New York, 1952).

  18. 18.

    Hagan JF, Shaw JS, Duncan PM (eds). Bright Futures: Guidelines for Health Supervision of Infants, Children, and Adolescents. 4th edn. Elk Grove Village, IL: American Academy of Pediatrics; 2017.

  19. 19.

    Kashdan, T. B. & Silvia, P. J. in Curiosity and interest: The benefits of thriving on novelty and challenge, Oxford handbook of positive psychology. Oxford University Press: USA, 2, 367–374, 2009.

  20. 20.

    Steger, M. F., Hicks, B. M., Kashdan, T. B., Krueger, R. F. & Bouchard, T. J. Genetic and environmental influences on the positive traits of the values in action classification, and biometric covariance with normal personality. J. Res. Pers. 41, 524–539 (2007).

  21. 21.

    Kashdan, T. B. et al. The curiosity and exploration inventory-ii: development, factor structure, and psychometrics. J. Res. Personal. 43, 987–998 (2009).

  22. 22.

    Kashdan, T. B. & Fincham, F. D. Facilitating Curiosity: A Social and Self-Regulatory Perspective for Scientifically Based Interventions. Positive Psychology in Practice. (John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: New Jersey, 2004) 482–503.

  23. 23.

    Black, A. E. & Deci, E. L. The effects of instructors’ autonomy support and students’ autonomous motivation on learning organic chemistry: a self‐determination theory perspective. Sci. Educ. 84, 740–756 (2000).

  24. 24.

    Froiland, J. M., Mayor, P. & Herlevi, M. Motives emanating from personality associated with achievement in a Finnish senior high school: physical activity, curiosity, and family motives. Sch. Psychol. Int. 36, 207–221 (2015).

  25. 25.

    Tucker-Drob, E. M., Briley, D. A., Engelhardt, L. E., Mann, F. D. & Harden, K. P. Genetically-mediated associations between measures of childhood character and academic achievement. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 111, 790–815 (2016).

  26. 26.

    Blair, C. & Razza, R. P. Relating effortful control, executive function, and false belief understanding to emerging math and literacy ability in kindergarten. Child. Dev. 78, 647–663 (2007).

  27. 27.

    Woods-Groves, S. & Choi, T. Relationship of teachers’ ratings of kindergarteners’ 21st century skills and student performance. Psychol. Sch. 54, 1034–1048 (2017).

  28. 28.

    Barbarin, O. A. et al. Parental conceptions of school readiness: relation to ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and children’s skills. Early Educ. Dev. 19, 671–701 (2008).

  29. 29.

    Snow, K. et al. Early Childhood Longitudinal Study, Birth Cohort (ECLS-B) Kindergarten 2006 and 2007 Data File User’s Manual (2010-010). Statistics NCfE. (U.S. Department of Education, Washington, D.C., 2009).

  30. 30.

    Day, H. I. Curiosity and the interested explorer. Perform. & Instr. 21, 19–22 (1982).

  31. 31.

    Hall, G.S. & Smith, T.L. Curiosity and interest. Pedagog. Semi. 10, 315–358 (2012).

  32. 32.

    Maw W. H. A Definition of Curiosity, A Factor Analysis Study. Delaware University, Newark, 1967.

  33. 33.

    Kidd, C. & Hayden Benjamin, Y. The psychology and neuroscience of curiosity. Neuron 88, 449–460 (2015).

  34. 34.

    Eisenberg, N, Smith, C.L, Sadovsky, A. & Spinrad, T.L. in Effortful control: relations with emotion regulation, adjustment, and socialization in childhood. In: Baumeister, R.F. & Vohs, K.D. (eds.) Handbook of self-regulation: research, theory, and applications. 259–282 (Guilford Press: New York, 2004).

  35. 35.

    Resnick, M. B. et al. The impact of low birth weight, perinatal conditions, and sociodemographic factors on educational outcome in kindergarten. Pediatrics 104, e74 (1999).

  36. 36.

    Poulsen, G. et al. Gestational age and cognitive ability in early childhood: a population-based cohort study. Paediatr. Perinat. Epidemiol. 27, 371–379 (2013).

  37. 37.

    Larson, K., Russ, S. A., Nelson, B. B., Olson, L. M. & Halfon, N. Cognitive ability at kindergarten entry and socioeconomic status. Pediatrics 135, e440–e448 (2015).

  38. 38.

    Magnuson, K. A., Ruhm, C. & Waldfogel, J. Does prekindergarten improve school preparation and performance? Econ. Educ. Rev. 26, 33–51 (2007).

  39. 39.

    Mollborn, S., Lawrence, E., James-Hawkins, L. & Fomby, P. When do socioeconomic resources matter most in early childhood?. Adv. life Course Res. 20, 56–59 (2014).

  40. 40.

    SAS Institute Inc. Base SAS(R) 9.4 Procedures Guide: Statistical Procedures. (SAS Institute, North Carolina, 2014).

  41. 41.

    Broussard, S. C. & Garrison, M. E. B. The relationship between classroom motivation and academic achievement in elementary-school-aged children. Fam. Consum. Sci. Res. J. 33, 106–120 (2004).

  42. 42.

    Ursache, A., Blair, C. & Raver, C. C. The promotion of self-regulation as a means of enhancing school readiness and early achievement in children at risk for school failure.Child Dev. Persp. 6, 122–128 (2012).

  43. 43.

    Deci E. L. & Ryan R. M. Intrinsic motivation: Wiley Online Library. Plenum Publishing Co.: New York, 1975.

  44. 44.

    Maw, W. H. & Maw, E. W. Self-concepts of high- and low-curiosity boys. Child. Dev. 41, 123–129 (1970).

  45. 45.

    Markland, D., Ryan, R. M., Tobin, V. J. & Rollnick, S. Motivational interviewing and self–determination theory. J. Soc. Clin. Psychol. 24, 811–831 (2005).

  46. 46.

    John, O. P., Caspi, A., Robins, R. W., Moffitt, T. E. & Stouthamer-Loeber, M. The “Little Five”: exploring the nomological network of the five-factor model of personality in adolescent boys. Child. Dev. 65, 160–178 (1994).

  47. 47.

    Heckman J. J. & Kautz T. Fostering and measuring skills: Interventions that improve character and cognition. No. w19656. National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc, 2013.

  48. 48.

    Kautz T., Heckman J. J., Diris R., Ter Weel B. & Borghans L. Fostering and measuring skills: improving cognitive and non-cognitive skills to promote lifetime success. No. w20749. National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc, 2014.

  49. 49.

    Cicero, H. & Rackham, T. De finibus bonorum el malorum.. (Harvard Press, Cambridge, MA, 1914).

  50. 50.

    Loewenstein, G. The psychology of curiosity: a review and reinterpretation. Psychol. Bull. 116, 75–98 (1994).

  51. 51.

    Gopnik, A. Scientific thinking in young children: theoretical advances, empirical research, and policy implications. Science 337, 1623–1627 (2012).

Download references


University of Michigan, NICHD (K08HD078506), Academy of Zero to Three Fellows. This research was supported by funding from the University of Michigan, NICHD (K08HD078506), and Academy of Zero to Three Fellows to the lead author (PES).

Author information

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Correspondence to Prachi E. Shah.

Electronic supplementary material

Supplemental Table S1

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark
Fig. 1