Decitabine enhances targeting of AML cells by NY-ESO-1-specific TCR-T cells and promotes the maintenance of effector function and the memory phenotype

Kang, Synat; Wang, Lixin; Xu, Lu; Wang, Ruiqi; Kang, Qingzheng; Gao, Xuefeng; Yu, Li

doi:10.1038/s41388-022-02455-y

Download PDF

Article
Open access
Published: 12 September 2022

Decitabine enhances targeting of AML cells by NY-ESO-1-specific TCR-T cells and promotes the maintenance of effector function and the memory phenotype

Oncogene volume 41, pages 4696–4708 (2022)Cite this article

2659 Accesses
4 Citations
2 Altmetric
Metrics details

Subjects

Abstract

NY-ESO-1 is a well-known cancer-testis antigen (CTA) with re-expression in numerous cancer types, but its expression is suppressed in myeloid leukemia cells. Patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) receiving decitabine (DAC) exhibit induced expression of NY-ESO-1 in blasts; thus, we investigated the effects of NY-ESO-1-specific TCR-engineered T (TCR-T) cells combined with DAC against AML. NY-ESO-1-specific TCR-T cells could efficiently eliminate AML cell lines (including U937, HL60, and Kasumi-1cells) and primary AML blasts in vitro by targeting the DAC-induced NY-ESO-1 expression. Moreover, the incubation of T cells with DAC during TCR transduction (designated as dTCR-T cells) could further enhance the anti-leukemia efficacy of TCR-T cells and increase the generation of memory-like phenotype. The combination of DAC with NY-ESO-1-specific dTCR-T cells showed a superior anti-tumor efficacy in vivo and prolonged the survival of an AML xenograft mouse model, with three out of five mice showing complete elimination of AML cells over 90 days. This outcome was correlated with enhanced expressions of IFN-γ and TNF-α, and an increased proportion of central memory T cells (CD45RO⁺CD62L⁺ and CD45RO⁺CCR7⁺). Taken together, these data provide preclinical evidence for the combined use of DAC and NY-ESO-1-specific dTCR-T cells for the treatment of AML.

The third-generation anti-CD30 CAR T-cells specifically homing to the tumor and mediating powerful antitumor activity

Article Open access 21 June 2022

Fc receptor-like 5 (FCRL5)-directed CAR-T cells exhibit antitumor activity against multiple myeloma

Article Open access 12 January 2024

Development of CAR-T cells specifically targeting cancer stem cell antigen DNAJB8 against solid tumours

Article 16 December 2022

Introduction

Despite therapeutic advances in the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in the past few years, the overall survival of AML patients is still poor due to primary and secondary resistance [1]. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) can induce remission in AML patients through the T cell-mediated graft-versus-leukemia effect, but the success of this approach is limited, with relapse in approximately 30–50% of cases depending mainly on the disease status at the time of transplantation [2,3,4]. Furthermore, leukemia cells can also evade the immune system in AML patients after allo-HSCT via several mechanisms [5]. The efforts to reduce toxicity while preserving the anti-tumor efficacy of cytotoxic T cells, as well as to export this therapeutic opportunity beyond the allo-HSCT context, have driven the development of engineered cytotoxic T cells. The redirection of T cells with chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) and T cell receptor (TCR) has been reported to overcome the limitations of allo-HSCT in the treatment of relapsed and refractory leukemia [6,7,8]. CAR-T cells can recognize and kill tumor cells by binding target cell surface antigens in an MHC-unrestricted manner, which is the most common strategy for hematological treatment [9,10,11]. However, the absence of leukemia-specific surface antigens for CAR-T cells to target limits its application in leukemia immunotherapy [12]. Alternatively, TCR-transduced T-cells (TCR-T) can recognize intracellular antigens processed by major histocompatibility (MHC) proteins, which have revealed encouraging results in preclinical and clinical studies [13,14,15].

A variety of cancer-testis antigens (CTAs) have been recognized as potential targets for cancer immunotherapy, given their restricted expression in somatic tissues and aberrant expression in malignant cells [16, 17]. Among the CTA family, NY-ESO-1 is of particular interest, and the safety and efficacy of NY-ESO-1-specific immunotherapies have been demonstrated in a variety of tumors such as sarcoma, melanoma, myeloma, and non-small cell lung cancer [16, 18,19,20,21]. However, the expression of NY-ESO-1 and many other CTAs is suppressed in myeloid leukemia cells due to promoter hypermethylation [22,23,24], which is the main hurdle for immunotherapy for myeloid malignancies that target CTAs. Demethylating agents, such as 5-azacytidine (5AC) and 5-aza-2’-deoxycytidine (decitabine, DAC), can inhibit DNA methyltransferases, thereby leading to re-expression of tumor-suppressor genes, and are approved by the FDA to treat myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and AML. Our study and others have previously reported that DAC could induce the expression of CTAs, including NY-ESO-1, in circulating myeloid cells and leukemic blast in MDS/AML patients [23, 25,26,27,28,29,30]. Furthermore, the induction of NY-ESO-1 expression could activate a cytotoxic response from HLA-compatible NY-ESO-1-specific T lymphocytes [25], which has laid the basis for combining CTA-specific immunotherapy with demethylation agents for the treatment of AML. For example, NY-ESO-1 vaccination combined with DAC for the treatment of AML has established positive results in a phase I clinical study [27]. Although DAC-induced NY-ESO-1-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) have been used in clinical settings, CTLs express wild-type TCRs, which have low affinity for their target under tumor-escaping conditions [31, 32].

In this study, we show that the combined use of DAC with high-affinity NY-ESO-1-specific TCR-T cells has a high efficacy against AML. Moreover, the treatment of TCR-T cells with DAC during transduction (designated as dTCR-T) can further enhance their anti-leukemia efficacy in vivo, and increase the memory phenotype with long-term persistence and anti-leukemia durability.

Results

Decitabine induces NY-ESO-1 expression in leukemia cell lines and primary AML blasts by demethylating the DNA promoter region

We treated four AML cell lines, including U937, HL60, Kasumi-1, and THP-1 cells, with various doses (100–1000 nM) of DAC for 72 h and observed an up-regulation of NY-ESO-1 in U937, HL60, and Kasumi-1 cell lines at both the mRNA and protein levels (Supplementary Fig. S1A–F). However, the expression of NY-ESO-1 did not change in THP-1 cells, suggesting a poor response to DAC (Supplementary Fig. S1G, H). By treating the AML cell lines with DAC at doses ranging from 100 nM to 1000 nM, we observed that the expression level of NY-ESO-1 peaked at 200 nM for U937, HL60, and Kasumi-1 cell lines. By monitoring the NY-ESO-1 expression for 10 days after treatment with 200 nM DAC, the highest level was detected at 3 days for U937, HL60, and Kasumi-1 cell lines, and the significantly high levels (relative to the untreated cells) were maintained until 10 days after exposure for U937 and HL60 cell lines (Fig. 1A–C). The THP-1 cell line showed only a moderate increase in the NY-ESO-1 mRNA level at 10 days of DAC treatment (Fig. 1D). The protein level of NY-ESO-1 after 3 days of DAC exposure was consistent with the results of the mRNA level (Fig. 1E). Thus, DAC induces NY-ESO-1 expression in AML cells in dose- and time-dependent manners.

**Fig. 1: Decitabine induces NY-ESO-1 expression in AML cell lines through DNA demethylation.**

Furthermore, we assessed NY-ESO-1 expression in primary blasts isolated from the bone marrow of four AML patients who were treated by DAC. Patient characteristics and chemotherapy regimens are presented in Table 1. A significant increase in the NY-ESO-1 mRNA level was detected in the primary blasts of three AML patients (patient nos. 1, 3, and 4; Fig. 1F), but not for patient no. 2 who had achieved a complete remission (<5% AML blasts in the bone marrow, blood cell counts are normal and absence of any disease signs or symptoms) after the chemotherapy. In addition, we accessed the safety of combined high-affinity TCR-T cells with DAC with human normal bone marrow and three normal cell lines (HK-2, proximal tubule epithelial cell; NCM460, colon mucosal epithelial cell; and MCF10A, breast epithelial cell), and found that the NY-ESO-1 expression was low in these normal cells and not affected by DAC treatment (Supplementary Fig. S2A–H). Thus, the effect of DAC on up-regulating NY-ESO-1 expression is restricted to AML cells.

DNA methyltransferase DNMT3a encodes an epigenetic regulator that mediates de novo methylation of CpG dinucleotides. We found that DNMT3a expression was significantly reduced by DAC treatment in U937, HL60, and Kasumi-1 cell lines, but not in the THP-1 cell line (Fig. 1G), indicating a differential susceptibility of AML subclones to DAC treatment among these cells. In the bone marrow samples, DNMT3a expression was significantly reduced in three AML patients (nos. 1, 3, 4) who showed no remission after DAC treatment, but not for patient no. 2 who achieved complete remission and a healthy donor (Fig. 1H). In addition, DAC did not affect DNMT3a expression in human normal bone marrow and normal cell lines (HK-2, NCM460, and MCF10A) (Supplementary Fig. S2M). Moreover, bisulfite sequencing analysis showed that DAC significantly induced the demethylation of the NY-ESO-1 promoter region in U937, HL60, and Kasumi-1 cell lines (Fig. 1I–K), but barely affected the methylation status of the NY-ESO-1 promoter in THP-1, HK-2, MCF10A, NCM460, and normal bone marrow cells (Fig. 1L; Supplementary Fig. S2I–L).

Taken together, these data reveal that the up-regulation of NY-ESO-1 in AML cells is associated with DAC-induced NY-ESO-1 promoter hypomethylation. Moreover, normal cells and the THP-1 cell line do not respond to the demethylation effect of DAC.

Decitabine enhances NY-ESO-1-specific TCR-T cell-mediated recognition and killing of AML cells in vitro

Given the ability of DAC to induce NY-ESO-1 expression in AML cells, we investigated whether DAC could increase the recognition of AML cells by NY-ESO-1-specific TCR-T cells. TCR-expression in CD3⁺ and CD8⁺ cells confirmed a high transduction efficiency of NY-ESO-1-specific TCR-T (Supplementary Fig. S3).

Our previous study demonstrated that high-affinity 1G4 TCR-T cells (K_D = 1.07 μM) showed enhanced killing activities than the wild-type 1G4 TCR-T cells (K_D = 32 μM) [32]. We found here, in consistence with our previous study, high-affinity TCR-T (ha-TCR-T; thereafter referred to as TCR-T in other sections) cells in combing with DAC remains better killing than the wild-type TCR-T (wt-TCR-T) cells against AML. The cytokine secretions and cytotoxicity were higher in ha-TCR-T than wt-TCR-T cells against U937-A2⁺, HL60-A2⁺, and Kasumi-1-A2⁺ cells, but not in THP-1-A2⁺ cells (Fig. 2A–L). IFN-γ and TNF-α were secreted by ha-TCR-T and wt-TCR-T cells co-cultured with DAC-treated U937-A2⁺, HL60-A2⁺, and Kasumi-1-A2⁺ cells, whereas low cytokine secretion was detected in the untreated controls. The level of cytokine secretion in response to the targets was higher in ha-TCR-T cells than wt-TCR-T cells (Fig. 2A–C, Fig. 2E–G). In addition, the ha-TCR-T and wt-TCR-T cells secreted higher levels of IFN-γ and TNF-α in response to DAC-treated U937-A2⁺ cells compared to those in response to DAC-treated HL60-A2⁺ and Kasumi-1-A2⁺ cells. Both ha- and wt-TCR-T cells cultured with THP-1-A2⁺ cells showed no activation, and with only minimal levels of cytokine secretion with or without DAC exposure (Fig. 2D, H). Thus, cytokine production by TCR-T cells is correlated with NY-ESO-1 expression by target cells.

**Fig. 2: NY-ESO-1-specific high-affinity TCR-T cells kill AML cell lines by recognizing decitabine-induced NY-ESO-1.**

The LDH assay was performed to evaluate the cytotoxicity of NY-ESO-1-specific ha-TCR-T and wt-TCR-T cells against AML cells with different E:T ratios (Fig. 2I–L). The untransduced T cells (NT-T), wt-TCR-T, and ha-TCR-T cells that were cultured with untreated target cells showed low cytolytic activity. Specific lysis of U937-A2⁺, HL60-A2⁺, and Kasumi-1-A2⁺ cells by NY-ESO-1-specific ha-TCR-T and wt-TCR-T cells were only observed when they were cultured with DAC (Fig. 2I–K). In addition, DAC did not trigger specific lysis of THP-1-A2⁺ cells by NY-ESO-1-specific the two TCR-T cells (Fig. 2L). Taken together, these data indicate that DAC can promote the recognition and killing of AML cells by NY-ESO-1-specific TCR-T cells in vitro.

Notably, co-culturing NT-T with DAC-induced U937-A2⁺ cells showed minor activation (Fig. 2A, E, I). We speculated that AML cell receiving DAC treatment might stimulate other antigen upregulations, including NKG2D ligands (NKG2DL) [38,39,40]. A subset of the T cells in bulk NT-T contained cytotoxicity T cells (CD8⁺, CD4⁺) and NK cell receptors (CD56⁺, NKG2D⁺) (Supplementary Fig. S4A–C). Therefore, the increased lysis of U937-A2⁺ cells by NT-T with DAC treatment may be associated with the upregulation of NKG2DL (Supplementary Fig. S4D-F), thereby facilitating the recognition and killing by T cells with NKG2D receptor.

The enhanced anti-leukemia activity of NY-ESO-1-specific TCR-T is MHC-dependent

To determine whether the anti-leukemia activity of NY-ESO-1-specific TCR-T cells was MHC dependent, we incubated DAC-treated U937-A2⁺, HL60-A2⁺, and Kasumi-1-A2⁺ cells with an MHC class I mAb (W6/32 mAb) or isotype control (IgG2a). A high level of TNF-α secretion was observed in TCR-T cells incubated with DAC-treated target cells without the MHC class I mAb compared to NT-T cells (Supplementary Fig. S5A–C). After blocking the interaction between the peptide/HLA complex and TCR on the target cells by the MHC class-I antibody, the co-culture of NY-ESO-1-specific TCR-T cells with DAC-treated target cells showed a significant reduction in TNF-α secretion in response to the target cells. No significant change was observed in the secretion of TNF-α in the culture with untreated target cells (Supplementary Fig. S5D–F). Thus, the increased level of TNF-α production of TCR-T cells induced by DAC depends on the TCR recognition of peptide–MHC.

NY-ESO-1-specific TCR-T cells recognize and kill primary leukemia blasts derived from DAC-treated AML patients

We further accessed the cytolytic function of NY-ESO-1-specific donor-derived TCR-T cells against primary AML blasts derived from the bone marrow of four AML patients (Table 1). A NY-ESO-1-specific donor-derived TCR-T cell response was observed in the primary blasts of patient no. 1 with the HLA-A2⁺ genotype (Fig. 3A). And the co-culture of NY-ESO-1-specific donor-derived TCR-T cells with primary blasts treated with DAC produced a significantly higher level of IFN-γ than those stimulated by primary blasts without DAC treatment. A low TCR-T response was detected in the bone marrow of patient no. 2 with the HLA-A2⁺ genotype who achieved complete remission (Fig. 3B). Moreover, there was only a weak (non-specific) response in patients no. 3 and no. 4 who were carrying the HLA-A2^- genotype (Fig. 3C, D). Thus, the response of NY-ESO-1-specific TCR-T cells to DAC-treated AML cells is restricted by HLA.

**Fig. 3: NY-ESO-1-specific donor-derived T cells effectively kill decitabine-treated primary AML blasts in vitro.**

Decitabine exposure during TCR transduction further enhances the anti-leukemia efficacy of NY-ESO-1-specific TCR-T cells and promotes the development of the memory phenotype

Recently, it was demonstrated CAR-T cells treated with low-dose DAC exhibit improved expansion, enhanced cytotoxicity and cytokine production, as well as reduced exhaustion after antigen exposure [41] Based on these findings, we investigated whether DAC exposure during TCR transduction could enhance the proliferation, viability, longevity, and anti-leukemia activity of TCR-T cells. To produce long-term expression of TCR-T and increase memory-associated T cells, we treated the activated-T cells with low-dose DAC and lentiviral particle encoding TCR gene in the context of recognizing NY-ESO-1_157-165 peptide. Lentivirus transduction, an efficient method for delivering transgenes to mammalian cells, achieved high transduction efficiency in the genome of various cell types, including CTLs and PBLs [42]. On the day three of TCR transduction, the culture was treated with DAC ranging from 10 to 1000 nM (Supplementary Fig. S6A), and these cells were designated as dTCR-T cells. A low-dose DAC (10–50 nM) showed little or no effect on the proliferation (Supplementary Fig. S6B) and viability of dTCR-T cells (Supplementary Fig. S6C), and showed no effect on generating the TCR-positive population (Supplementary Fig. S6D, E). By contrast, a high-dose DAC (200 nM or higher) showed toxicity with a significant reduction in the proliferation and viability of dTCR-T cells. The DNMT3a protein level was significantly reduced in dTCR-T cells compared with TCR-T cells after DAC treatment (Supplementary Fig. S6F), confirming the demethylation effect of DAC. Regarding the phenotypic changes, DAC (50 nM) increased the proportions of activated T cells (CD3⁺CD25⁺; Fig. 4A), cytotoxic phenotypes (CD8⁺ T cells and CD4⁺ T cells; Fig. 4B, C), and central memory-like phenotypes (CD45RO⁺CD62L⁺ and CD45RO⁺CCR7⁺ cells; Fig. 4D–G). Moreover, dTCR-T cells secreted higher levels of IFN-γ (Supplementary Fig. S6G) and TNF-α (Supplementary Fig. S6H) compared with TCR-T cells in the absence of target cells, indicating an enhanced unspecific killing capacity.

**Fig. 4: dTCR-T cells exhibit an improved memory phenotype under NY-ESO-1-specific stimulation.**

We assessed the in vitro functional activities of TCR-T cells and dTCR-T cells in the presence of DAC (50 nM) by ELISA and ELISpot assays. The productions of IFN-γ and TNF-α were further increased in dTCR-T cells cultured with DAC-treated AML cells (except for THP-1-A2⁺) (Fig. 5A, B; Supplementary Fig. S7). Consistent with the results of the cytokine release assays, dTCR-T cells exhibited enhanced in vitro cytotoxicity against DAC-treated U937-A2⁺ cells, but not THP-1-A2⁺ cells (Fig. 5C, D). Notably, dTCR-T cells demonstrated a high level of IFN-γ secretion against DAC-treated U937-A2⁺ cells, even at low E:T ratios (1:10, 1:20, 1:30, 1: 60) compared with TCR-T cells with equivalent TCR affinity (Fig. 5E). No response was observed in the untreated the target cells (Fig. 5F). These results indicate that DAC treatment during TCR signaling transduction can enhance the anti-leukemia activity of NY-ESO-1-specific dTCR-T cells against AML and promote the development of the memory-like phenotypes.

**Fig. 5: dTCR-T cells exhibit enhanced anti-leukemia cytotoxicity under NY-ESO-1-specific stimulation.**

NY-ESO-1-specific dTCR-T cells prolong the survival of AML xenograft mouse model with enhanced effector function and memory phenotype production

To investigate the efficacy of NY-ESO-1-specific TCR-T cells against DAC-treated AML cells in vivo, we established an AML xenograft mouse model using GFP-encoding U937-A2-luciferase⁺ cells (Fig. 6A). The expression of NY-ESO-1 protein was detected in the tumor tissues derived from DAC-treated mice (3 days after DAC treatment), but it was undetectable in untreated tissues (Fig. 6B). TCR-positive cells comprised ~57% of the bulk cell culture of TCR-T cells and dTCR-T cells (Supplementary Fig. S6D). Tumor growth was uncontrolled in mice that received PBS, NT-T, TCR-T, or dTCR-T cells without DAC (Fig. 6C–E). The administration of DAC alone slowed the tumor growth rate. Among the combined treatment regimens, mice treated with NT-T cells plus DAC showed further reduced tumor growth compared with DAC alone. The combination of DAC with TCR-T cells significantly suppressed tumor development, but tumor recurrence appeared around 1 month after treatment (43 days in Fig. 6C–E). The combination of dTCR-T plus DAC showed a superior tumor suppressive effect compared with the other treatment regimens. On day 61, three out of five mice treated with NY-ESO-1-specific dTCR-T cells plus DAC were tumor-free, as revealed by IVIS, while most mice in the TCR-T plus DAC group exhibited signs of tumor relapse or recurrence (Fig. 6E). Moreover, the survival of mice in the dTCR-T plus DAC group was significantly prolonged compared with the TCR-T plus DAC group and the other control groups (Fig. 6F). Interestingly, three out of five mice in the dTCR-T plus DAC group showed complete response until the end of the study (over 90 days).

**Fig. 6: NY-ESO-1-specific dTCR-T cells exhibit enhanced in vivo anti-tumor activity in the decitabine-treated AML xenograft mouse model.**

To interpret the enhanced anti-tumor activity of the combined treatment of dTCR-T plus DAC in vivo, flow cytometry was employed to analyze the percentages of GFP-positive, TCR-positive cells, and T-cell phenotypes in the peripheral blood of mice 10 days after treatment with DAC. The number of GFP⁺ cells in peripheral blood was significantly reduced in the three groups that received T cells plus DAC (Fig. 7A), which corresponded to the tumor size of each group. A higher percentage of TCR-positive cells in peripheral blood were observed in mice treated with TCR-T plus DAC, which was further increased in those treated with dTCR-T cells plus DAC (Fig. 7B). And mice treated with dTCR-T cells plus DAC showed a higher proportion of activated CD3⁺CD25⁺ cells (Fig. 7C), CD8⁺ cells (Fig. 7D), and CD4⁺ cells (Fig. 7E) compared with the other groups, suggesting higher anti-leukemia activity.

**Fig. 7: The combination of dTCR-T cells with decitabine produces more cytotoxic effector cells and cells with the memory-like phenotype in vivo.**

In addition, we measured the percentages of central memory T cells in the peripheral blood of the treated animals. Mice treated with dTCR-T cells showed 8.75% of CD45RO⁺CD62L⁺ T cells, which was significantly higher than that of the other groups (4.82%, TCR-T; 1.52%, NT-T; 0.57%, PBS; Fig. 7F, H), while the percentages of CD45RO⁺CCR7⁺ T cells showed no significant differences among dTCR-T, TCR-T, and NT-T treatment groups (Fig. 7G, I). The percentages of both types of central memory T cells were significantly increased in mice that received DAC with dTCR-T, TCR-T, or NT-T cells. Among the four DAC-treated groups, the highest percentages of CD45RO⁺CD62L⁺ (13.48%) and CD45RO⁺CCR7⁺ T cells (15.49%) were found in mice treated with dTCR-T plus DAC.

Taken together, a combination of DAC with NY-ESO-1-specific dTCR-T cells is superior in suppressing AML xenograft tumor growth and promoting tumor-free survival, possibly by promoting the maintenance of effector function and the memory phenotype.

Discussion

DAC exerts anti-tumoral activity via several potential mechanisms that associate with demethylation, including cytotoxicity and the DNA damage response [43, 44], re-expression of aberrantly silenced tumor suppressor genes [45, 46], upregulation of silenced tumor-associated antigens that enhance the anti-tumor immune response [47], and induction of cytosolic sensing of the double-stranded RNA response [48]. Among the up-regulated genes induced by DAC in AML blasts, NY-ESO-1 attracted our attention by its restricted tissue expression and immunogenicity suggesting a potential immunotherapeutic target to treat AML. In fact, NY-ESO-1-specific TCR-T cells have demonstrated high efficacy against both hematologic malignancies and solid tumors [16, 18, 19, 21]. Therefore, we anticipated that the combination of NY-ESO-1-specific TCR-T cells with DAC might achieve significant anti-leukemia potential in the treatment of AML.

Myeloid leukemia shows an absence or very low level of NY-ESO-1 expression due to dense promoter hypermethylation [22]. Consistent with previous studies [25, 49, 50], our results demonstrated that DAC could induce NY-ESO-1 re-expression in human AML cell lines through DNA promoter demethylation. Nevertheless, the DAC-induced expression of NY-ESO-1 protein was not detected in the THP-1 cell line as reported previously [23]. We postulate that the non-response was caused by the immature morphology of CpG methylation patterns of the THP-1 cell line [51], as it was established from the peripheral blood of a 1-year-old boy with AML. In addition to these results, the primary AML blasts derived from patients who received DAC treatment also showed increased NY-ESO-1 expression, consistent with a previous study [25]. Moreover, the bone marrow of an AML patient with a complete response expressed a low level of NY-ESO-1 after DAC treatment, confirming that DAC-induced NY-ESO-1 expression is restricted to AML blasts. Thus, the quantification of NY-ESO-1 expression in patients who received DAC may predict the clinical benefits of this combination approach.

The present study showed that the induced NY-ESO-1-expressing in AML cells could be efficiently targeted and killed by NY-ESO-1-specific TCR-T cells, both in vitro and in AML xenograft mouse models. The TCR-transduced T cells specifically recognized NY-ESO-1 in the context of the HLA-A2 restricted NY-ESO-1_157-165 peptide, consistent with a previous report [23]. The inhibition of target cells with an MHC-class I monoclonal antibody showed attenuated TCR activity with a significant reduction of TNF-α production by the NY-ESO-1-specific TCR-T cells. Our previous study demonstrated the effect of soluble high-affinity TCR (26 pM) in blocking melanoma and multiple myeloma cell lines, which could significantly reduce IFN-γ secretion [32]. Therefore, these data confirm that the enhanced anti-leukemia capacity of NY-ESO-1-specific TCR-T cells is MHC-dependent.

The combination of DAC with high-affinity NY-ESO-1-specific TCR-T cells revealed significant anti-leukemia efficacy in vivo, with complete tumor eradication and prolonged survival of AML xenograft mouse models. However, tumor relapse was still inevitable, indicating that the TCR-T cells might not persist long enough to maintain long-term remission. It was recently reported that DAC could induce DNA reprogramming of CAR-T cells, thereby promoting sustained cell expansion, cytotoxicity, and cytokine production, while reducing exhaustion after antigen exposure [41]. Based on these findings, we wondered whether TCR-T cells exposed to DAC during transduction could further increase their anti-leukemia capacity, proliferation, and longevity, and promote tumor-free survival. Central memory T cells, which are circulating cells prevalent in lymph nodes, have enhanced longevity and proliferative potential. As expected, treating TCR-T cells with a low dose of DAC (50 nM) during transduction, which were designated as dTCR-T cells, further enhanced their anti-leukemia capacity and cytokine secretion, and promoted the memory phenotype, which corresponded to an increased proportion of cytotoxic CD4⁺/CD8⁺ T cells and central memory CD45RO⁺CD62L⁺/CD45RO⁺CCR7⁺ T cells, respectively. Compared with TCR-T cells, the dTCR-T cells further prolonged the survival of DAC-treated mice bearing AML xenograft tumors. Consistent with previous studies [41, 52, 53], the development of the memory phenotype can boost anti-tumor immunity and ACT persistence, thereby resulting in superior clinical outcomes. Taken together, the increased anti-leukemia activity of dTCR-T cells could be related to an up-regulation in the cytotoxicity of T cells and an increase in the proportion of memory phenotype T-cells owing to the DAC-induced DNA methylation.

A safety concern of this combination is the potential risk of up-regulated CTA expression in normal human tissues induced by demethylation drugs. Several studies have demonstrated that DAC has no side effects on presenting antigen targets, including NY-ESO-1 in normal human tissues and cells such as normal skin, colon, bronchial epithelia, bone marrow, peripheral blood, astrocytes, fibroblasts, smooth muscle, and ovaries (Table 2) [54,55,56,57,58,59]. Moreover, our in vitro study demonstrated limited NY-ESO-1 expression in normal bone marrow cells and normal cell lines after treatment with DAC (Supplementary Fig. S2). The co-culture of these cells with high-affinity NY-ESO-1-specific TCR-T did not lead to cytotoxicity or cytokine secretion (Supplementary Fig. S8). Equally important, the therapeutic potential and safety of NY-ESO-1 vaccination in combination with DAC has been demonstrated in phase I clinical trials for the treatment of patients with high-risk MDS and ovarian cancer [27, 59]. These data are essential for prospective studies that aim to correlate the induction of NY-ESO-1-specific TCR-T or dTCR-T cells with the clinical response in patients with hematopoietic malignancies such as AML treated with DAC. However, additional clinical trials are necessary to access the safety of DAC combined with high-affinity TCR-T.

Table 1 Characteristics of the enrolled AML patients.

Full size table

The predominant mechanism of action of DAC is likely dose-dependent, with low doses inducing silenced gene re-expression and minimal DNA damage, while high doses causing more pronounced DNA damage and apoptosis. In clinical settings, low-dose DAC is recommended for the treatment of MDS and AML to favor hypomethylation over cytotoxicity. It has been reported that a low dose (0.25 mg/kg) of a demethylating agent could exert robust anti-tumor effects on hematological and epithelial tumor cells, and a significant reduction in tumor size was observed in mice bearing established xenografts after three cycles (2 weeks/cycle) of treatment [60]. Data from an in vitro study suggested that the DAC-induced expression of NY-ESO-1 protein was presented in time- and dose-dependent manners [23]. Thus, the DAC dosage and treatment regimen deserve further investigation to maximize and sustain the expression of NY-ESO-1 protein, thereby optimizing the TCR-T response.

In summary, DAC-induced NY-ESO-1 can be used as an immune target for TCR-T to treat AML. High-affinity NY-ESO-1_157-165 TCR-T cells showed an efficient anti-AML response. Demethylating TCR-T cells with DAC during transduction (dTCR-T) can significantly increase their cytotoxicity and cytokine secretion after antigen exposure. dTCR-T cells outperformed TCR-T cells in the anti-leukemia effects and preventing recurrence, likely by producing a higher proportion of memory-like phenotypes. There are several limitations in the present study. (1) The safety of combined high-affinity TCR-T cells with DAC should be further evaluated on cells from more critical organs such as brain, heart, and liver. (2) The AML xenograft mouse model cannot recapitulate the molecular genetics and phenotypic features, as found in primary human AML. (3) Similar to most clinical studies, we generated the engineered T cell products from PBMCs, which were mixed T cell populations containing both highly functional T cells and less-differentiated phenotypes. In preclinical models, the use of purified, naive T cell subsets for adoptive immunotherapy can enhance persistence and anti-tumor immunity [61]. Thus, the anti-leukemia effects of NY-ESO-1-specific TCR-T cells may be further improved if starting from naïve T cells selected from PBMCs.

Materials and methods

Cell lines

The antigen NY-ESO-1_157–165 (peptide SLLMWITQV) and HLA-A*02:01 double-negative cells of human acute myeloid leukemia (AML) cell lines (U937, HL60, and Kasumi-1), human normal cell lines (kidney proximal tubular 2, HK-2; breast epithelial cell, MCF10A), and the antigen NY-ESO-1_157–165-negative and HLA-A*02:01 positive cells (THP-1) were purchased from ATCC (Manassas, VA, USA). Human normal colon epithelia cell line NCM460, the antigen NY-ESO-1_157–165 and HLA-A*02:01 double-negative cells, was purchased from IN CELL (San Antonio, TX, USA). The antigen NY-ESO-1_157–165 and HLA-A*02:01 double-positive cells of the multiple myeloma (MM) cell line U266 (used as a positive control for NY-ESO-1 expression) were purchased from CBTCCCAS (Shanghai, China). We obtained HLA-A*02:01-positive cells of U937, HL60, Kasumi-1, HK-2, NCM460, and MCF10A cell lines by transducing the cell lines with HLA-A*02:01 lentiviral particles. AML and MM cell lines were cultured in RPMI 1640 (Gibco Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY, USA) containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Gibco Life Technologies). HK-2 cells were cultured in Minimum Essential Medium (MEM, Gibco Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY, USA) containing 10% FBS. MCF10A cells were cultured in DMEM-F12 (Procell, Wuhan, China) supplemented with 5% horse serum, 20 mg/mL epidermal growth factor (EGF), 0.01 mg/mL insulin, and 0.5 μg/mL Hydrocortisone. 293 T cells, a human embryonic kidney cell line purchased from ATCC. 293 T and NCM460 cells were cultured in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM, Gibco Life Technologies) containing 10% FBS.

Patient samples

The use of human materials in this study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Shenzhen University General Hospital. Mononuclear cells from the bone marrow of AML patients or healthy donors were isolated and cryopreserved following Ficoll centrifugation (Ficoll-Paque, GE Healthcare, Björkgatan, Uppsala, Sweden). The characteristics of the enrolled patients in clinics are shown in Table 1.

Table 2 Restricted NY-ESO-1 gene expression in normal cells or tissues treated with the decitabine.

Full size table

Decitabine treatment

5-Aza-2’-deoxycytidine (DAC; Sigma-Aldrich) was dissolved in phosphate buffered saline (PBS, 100 µM stock) and stored at −80 °C. We tested different doses and times of DAC treatment to optimize NY-ESO-1 expression in AML cells. AML cell lines were treated with 100 nM, 200 nM, 500 nM, or 1000 nM DAC in the cell culture medium for 72 h. For the time-dependent study, AML cell lines, normal cell lines (HK-2, NCM460, and MCF10A), and normal bone marrow cells were treated with 200 nM DAC, and NY-ESO-1 expression was measured on days 2, 3, 5, 7, and 10.

RNA extraction, cDNA synthesis, and real-time PCR

Total RNA was isolated with TRIzol Reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and synthesized from 1 μg of total RNA with the TransScript All-in-One First-Strand cDNA Synthesis SuperMix Kit for qPCR (Transgen, Beijing, China) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Quantitative RT-PCR was performed with the 7500 Real-Time PCR System (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) using the PerfectStart SYBR Green qPCR SuperMix Kit (Transgen). The primers for NY-ESO-1 and β-actin, which were used in this study, have been described previously [33]. The NY-ESO-1 primer sequences were as follows: forward primer – 5’-AAAAACACGGGCAGAAAGC-3’ and reverse primer – 5’-GCTTCAGGGCTGAATGGAT-3’. The β-actin primer sequences were as follows: forward primer – 5’-CCTCCATGATGCTGCTTACATGTC-3’ and reverse primer – 5’-ATGTCTCGCTCCGTGGCCTTAGCT-3’. The TCR primer sequences were as follows: forward primer – 5’-ATGGAGACACTGCTGGGC-3’ and reverse primer – 5’-CATGGTGAAGAAGAAGAACAGCTAA-3’. The relative expression of NY-ESO-1 and TCR was normalized to β-actin and calculated using the 2^-ΔΔCt method [34].

Western blotting

Cells and tumor tissues were lysed in RIPA buffer containing protease inhibitors (Solarbio, Beijing, China). Proteins were size-fractionated on 10–12% PAGE gels and transferred to Immobilon-transfer nitrocellulose membranes (Millipore, Burlington, MA, USA). The membranes were incubated with anti-human NY-ESO-1 (1:250 dilution; Clone SP349; Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA), anti-DNMT3 (1:2000; Clone EPR18455, Abcam), and anti-β-actin (1:2000 dilution; Clone 13E5; Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA), washed, and incubated with an HRP-labeled secondary antibody. Protein bands were detected with the Chemiluminescent HRP Substrate Kit (Millipore). The densitometry readings/intensity ratios were analyzed with the ChemiDoc XRS + System (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) by comparing the protein band intensity of NY-ESO-1 or DNMT3a to the protein band intensity of β-actin.

DNA methylation analysis

Genomic DNA was isolated from DAC-treated AML cell lines and untreated control cells with the Wizard Genomic DNA Purification Kit (Cat. A1120, Promega, Madison, WI, USA). The sodium bisulfite conversion of DNA was performed with the EZ DNA Methylation Kit (Cat. D5001, Zymo Research, Irvine, CA, USA). The methylation status of the NY-ESO-1 promoter region was accessed by sodium bisulfite sequencing as described previously [35]. MethPrimer was used to design the primers [36], and the primer sequences were as follows: forward primer – 5’-GGATGGGATAGGTTGGGTTT-3’ and reverse primer – 5’-AACTTAAACCCCTCACCCCTA-3’. The PCR products were purified and cloned into the pGM-T vector (Cat.VT202-01, TianGen, Beijing, China). The individual clones were analyzed using the ABI PRISM 3730 DNA Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Foster, CA, USA).

Flow cytometry

Multicolor gated flow cytometry was performed to analyze the expression of cell surface proteins stained with monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) as described previously [32]. The human mAbs used in this study are listed in Supplementary Table 1. CytoExpert software (version 1.1.10.0, Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA) and FlowJo software (Version 10.0.7, FlowJo LLC, Ashland, OR, USA) were used to analyze the FACS data.

Generation of TCR-T cells

NY-ESO-1-specific high-affinity 1G4 TCR (K_D = 1.07 μM) and wild-type 1G4TCR (K_D = 32 μM) in the context of HLA-A*02:01 was generated and cloned into a lentivirus vector as described previously [32]. The unique clone of wild-type 1G4 TCR, which was isolated from a melanoma patient, was substituted with a dual amino acid in the third complementary determining region (CDR3α) to enhance the TCR affinity and improve the antigen-specific reactivity of T cells (designated 1G4-α95:LY TCR) [37]. Lentiviral particle production and generation of NY-ESO-1-specific TCR-T cells were performed as described previously [32]. To produce the lentiviral products, the desired TCR genes (containing α- and β-chains) were cloned into the pCDH lentiviral vector. The desired TCR plasmid and lentiviral package system consisting of the packaging construct (RRE), Rev expression plasmid (REV), and envelope construct (pG2M.D) were transfected into ~80% confluent 293 T cells, which were cultured in DMEM containing 10% FBS. The supernatant was collected after 48 and 72 h of transfection, concentrated by ultracentrifugation (50 kDa centrifugal filter units; Merck kGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) at 4000 g for 20 min at 4 °C, and stored at −80 °C.

For the generation of NY-ESO-1 specific TCR-T cells (TCR-T), human peripheral blood cells (PBMCs) from healthy donors were stimulated with human T-activator CD3 dynabeads/CD28 mAb microbeads (Cat.11161D, Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY, USA) at a bead:cell ratio of 1:1, and cultured in X-VIVO 15 medium (Lonza, Basel, Switzerland) containing 100 IU/mL IL-2 (PeproTech Inc., Beijing). After 48 h of activation, activated T cells (1 × 10⁶) were transduced with a multiplicity of infection of 5 (5 MOI) of lentiviral particles containing the TCR gene at 48 and 72 h.

To examine the effects of DAC on the development of TCR-T, after 48 h of PBMC stimulation, serial doses (10 nM, 50 nM, 200 nM, and 1000 nM) of DAC were added simultaneously during the first 24 h of transduction. T cells were then re-transfected with TCR lentiviral particles without DAC for another 24 h (designated as dTCR-T cells). After transduction, the bulk TCR-T, dTCR-T, and NT-T cells were expanded ex vivo with X-VIVO 15 medium containing IL-2.

The dynabeads were removed before cell analysis. TCR-positive T cells were detected by staining with FITC-, PE-, and APC-conjugated antibodies, including anti-human CD8 (Clone RPA-T8, BioLegend, San Diego, CA, USA), anti-human CD3 (Clone HIT3a, BioLegend), and anti-human TCR vβ13.1 (Clone H131, BioLegend) or anti-mouse TCR β chain (Clone H57-597, BioLegend).

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)

Cytokine production was assessed by ELISA (BioGems, Westlake Village, CA, USA) using supernatants according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Briefly, effector cells were cultured with 2 × 10⁴ target cells at an E:T ratio of 5:1 for 20 h in fresh medium (final volume, 200 μL). Supernatants and standard controls (100 μL, prepared according to the instructions) were transferred to a primary antibody pre-coated (IFN-γ or TNF-α) 96-well strip microplate, incubated at 37 °C for 90 min, and washed. The avidin-biotin-peroxidase complex was added, and the microplate was incubated at 37 °C for 30 min. After additional washes, the color-developing reagent was added, and the microplate was maintained in the dark for 30 min. The reaction was stopped, and the absorbance was measured with a Multiskan FC microplate reader (Thermo Fisher Scientific) at 450 nm.

Enzyme-linked immunospot (ELISpot) assay

ELISpot assays were performed according to the manufacturer’s protocol (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA; Bio-Techne, Minneapolis, MN, USA). Briefly, 96-well flat-bottom plates were pre-coated overnight with anti-IFN-γ, washed with RPMI 1640 containing 10% FBS, and blocked with culture medium at room temperature for 2 h. The effectors were added at a final concentration of 2 × 10³ cells per well in duplicate in the presence of target cells at serial effector-to-target (E:T) ratios (1:10, 1:20, 1:30, and 1:60) for 20 h. The biotinylated secondary antibody was added, and the plates were incubated at room temperature for 2 h. Streptavidin-horseradish peroxidase was added, followed by incubation for 1 h. After additional washes, 3-amino-9-ethylcarbazole (AEC Substrate Kit; BD Biosciences) was added, followed by incubation at room temperature for 3–5 min. The reaction was stopped by the addition of water, and the plate was air-dried and analyzed using the ELISpot reader (BIOsys ELISpot Reader, Karben, Germany).

Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) assay

Cytotoxicity was assessed with the CytoTox 96 Non-radioactive Cytotoxicity Assay (Promega) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Briefly, effector cells were prepared in fresh medium and cultured with 2 × 10⁴ target cells at serial E:T ratios (5:1, 2.5:1, and 1.25:1) in a final volume of 200 μL. Control groups, such as spontaneous release (effector or target cells only), maximum release (target cells with 20 μL ×10 lysis buffer), and medium background (no cells added), were also set up. The plates were incubated at 37 °C for 20 h. After centrifugation, 50 μL of the supernatant was transferred into the wells of a flat-bottom plate, and 50 μL of CytoTox 96 Reagent was added. The plates were incubated at room temperature in the dark for 30 min. The reaction was stopped by adding 50 μL of stop solution, and the absorbance was measured with a Multiskan FC microplate reader at 490 nm. Cytotoxicity was calculated using the following formula:

$${{{\mathrm{\% }}}}\;{{{\mathrm{Cytotoxicity}}}} = \frac{{{{{\mathrm{Experimental}}}} - {{{\mathrm{Effector}}}}\;{{{\mathrm{Spontaneous}}}} - {{{\mathrm{Target}}}}\;{{{\mathrm{Spontaneous}}}}}}{{{{{\mathrm{Target}}}}\;{{{\mathrm{Maximum}}}}-{{{\mathrm{Target}}}}\;{{{\mathrm{Spontaneous}}}}}} \times 100$$

Mouse xenograft models

Animal studies were performed using a standard protocol approved by the IACUC of Peking University Shenzhen Graduate School (Shenzhen, China). Immunodeficient NCG (NOD/ShiLtJGpt-Prkdcem^26Cd52Il2rg^em26Cd22/Gpt) mice (6 weeks old, male) were purchased from GemPharmatech Co., Ltd. (Nanjing, China). Each NCG mouse received a subcutaneous injection of 3.0 × 10⁶ fluorescent U937-A2-luciferase⁺ cells (U937-A2-GFP-Luci⁺) in 200 µL of PBS on day 0. Animals were organized into eight groups according to tumor size (average, 80–100 mm³), including four groups treated without DAC (PBS, n = 5; NT-T, n = 5; TCR-T, n = 5; and dTCR-T, n = 5), and another four groups treated with DAC alone (n = 5) or in combination with adoptive T cells (NT-T plus DAC, n = 5; TCR-T plus DAC, n = 5; and dTCR-T plus DAC, n = 5). DAC was given on days 7 to 11 via intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection at a dose of 1.0 mg/kg body weight in 100 μL of PBS. On day 13, mice in six groups (except PBS and DAC groups) were treated by intravenous (i.v.) injection of 1.0 × 10⁷ NT-T cells, TCR-T cells, or dTCR-T cells.

Tumor growth was monitored every 3 days using a caliper and weekly by bioluminescence imaging (BLI) with the IVIS Lumina III in Vivo Imaging System (PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA). The prolonged survival of animals was recorded from the first day of treatment until death or the largest tumor volume (≤1800 mm³). Peripheral blood (~200 μL) was collected through the canthus for subsequent flow cytometry analysis of tumor cell infilration and TCR-T cell persistence.

Statistical analyses

Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism 8.0 software (GraphPad Software, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). Statistical analysis was performed using unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-test for comparing two groups and log-range Mantel–Cox test for comparing survival differences between the groups. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

References

Walter RB, Estey EH. Selection of initial therapy for newly-diagnosed adult acute myeloid leukemia: Limitations of predictive models. Blood Rev. 2020;44:100679.
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Wakamatsu M, Terakura S, Ohashi K, Fukuda T, Ozawa Y, Kanamori H, et al. Impacts of thymoglobulin in patients with acute leukemia in remission undergoing allogeneic HSCT from different donors. Blood Adv. 2019;3:105–15.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Arai Y, Takeda J, Aoki K, Kondo T, Takahashi S, Onishi Y, et al. Efficiency of high-dose cytarabine added to CY/TBI in cord blood transplantation for myeloid malignancy. Blood. 2015;126:415–22.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Storb R, Gyurkocza B, Storer BE, Sorror ML, Blume K, Niederwieser D, et al. Graft-versus-host disease and graft-versus-tumor effects after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31:1530–8.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Zeiser R, Vago L. Mechanisms of immune escape after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Blood. 2019;133:1290–7.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
June CH, O’Connor RS, Kawalekar OU, Ghassemi S, Milone MC. CAR T cell immunotherapy for human cancer. Science. 2018;359:1361.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Zhang Y, Li Y. T cell receptor-engineered T cells for leukemia immunotherapy. Cancer Cell Int. 2019;19:2.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Tawara I, Kageyama S, Miyahara Y, Fujiwara H, Nishida T, Akatsuka Y, et al. Safety and persistence of WT1-specific T-cell receptor gene-transduced lymphocytes in patients with AML and MDS. Blood. 2017;130:1985–94.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
June CH, Sadelain M. Chimeric antigen receptor therapy. N. Engl J Med. 2018;379:64–73.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Fry TJ, Shah NN, Orentas RJ, Stetler-Stevenson M, Yuan CM, Ramakrishna S, et al. CD22-targeted CAR T cells induce remission in B-ALL that is naive or resistant to CD19-targeted CAR immunotherapy. Nat Med. 2018;24:20–28.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Turtle CJ, Hanafi L-A, Berger C, Gooley TA, Cherian S, Hudecek M, et al. CD19 CAR-T cells of defined CD4+:CD8+ composition in adult B cell ALL patients. J Clin Invest. 2016;126:2123–38.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Mardiana S, Gill S. CAR T cells for acute myeloid leukemia: state of the art and future directions. Front Oncol. 2020;10:697.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Chapuis AG, Egan DN, Bar M, Schmitt TM, McAfee MS, Paulson KG, et al. T cell receptor gene therapy targeting WT1 prevents acute myeloid leukemia relapse post-transplant. Nat Med. 2019;25:1064–72.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Bethune MT, Li X-H, Yu J, McLaughlin J, Cheng D, Mathis C, et al. Isolation and characterization of NY-ESO-1-specific T cell receptors restricted on various MHC molecules. P Natl Acad Sci USA. 2018;115:E10702–11.
Article CAS Google Scholar
Jahn L, van der Steen DM, Hagedoorn RS, Hombrink P, Kester MGD, Schoonakker MP, et al. Generation of CD20-specific TCRs for TCR gene therapy of CD20low B-cell malignancies insusceptible to CD20-targeting antibodies. Oncotarget. 2016;7:77021–37.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Robbins PF, Morgan RA, Feldman SA, Yang JC, Sherry RM, Dudley ME, et al. Tumor regression in patients with metastatic synovial cell sarcoma and melanoma using genetically engineered lymphocytes reactive with NY-ESO-1. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:917–24.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Jungbluth AA, Chen YT, Stockert E, Busam KJ, Kolb D, Iversen K, et al. Immunohistochemical analysis of NY-ESO-1 antigen expression in normal and malignant human tissues. Int J Cancer. 2001;92:856–60.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Robbins PF, Kassim SH, Tran TL, Crystal JS, Morgan RA, Feldman SA, et al. A pilot trial using lymphocytes genetically engineered with an NY-ESO-1-reactive T-cell receptor: long-term follow-up and correlates with response. Clin Cancer Res. 2015;21:1019–27.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Xia Y, Tian X, Wang J, Qiao D, Liu X, Xiao L, et al. Treatment of metastatic non-small cell lung cancer with NY-ESO-1 specific TCR engineered-T cells in a phase I clinical trial: A case report. Oncol Lett. 2018;16:6998–7007.
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Stadtmauer EA, Faitg TH, Lowther DE, Badros AZ, Chagin K, Dengel K, et al. Long-term safety and activity of NY-ESO-1 SPEAR T cells after autologous stem cell transplant for myeloma. Blood Adv. 2019;3:2022–34.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Rapoport AP, Stadtmauer EA, Binder-Scholl GK, Goloubeva O, Vogl DT, Lacey SF, et al. NY-ESO-1-specific TCR-engineered T cells mediate sustained antigen-specific antitumor effects in myeloma. Nat Med. 2015;21:914–21.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Lim SH, Austin S, Owen-Jones E, Robinson L. Expression of testicular genes in haematological malignancies. Brit J Cancer. 1999;81:1162–4.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Almstedt M, Blagitko-Dorfs N, Duque-Afonso J, Karbach J, Pfeifer D, Jager E, et al. The DNA demethylating agent 5-aza-2’-deoxycytidine induces expression of NY-ESO-1 and other cancer/testis antigens in myeloid leukemia cells. Leuk Res. 2010;34:899–905.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Caballero OL, Chen YT. Cancer/testis (CT) antigens: potential targets for immunotherapy. Cancer Sci. 2009;100:2014–21.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Srivastava P, Paluch BE, Matsuzaki J, James SR, Collamat-Lai G, Blagitko-Dorfs N. et al. Induction of cancer testis antigen expression in circulating acute myeloid leukemia blasts following hypomethylating agent monotherapy. Oncotarget. 2016;7:12840–56.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
You L, Han Q, Zhu L, Zhu Y, Bao C, Yang C, et al. Decitabine-mediated epigenetic reprograming enhances anti-leukemia efficacy of CD123-Targeted chimeric antigen receptor T-cells. Front Immunol. 2020;11:1787.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Griffiths EA, Srivastava P, Matsuzaki J, Brumberger Z, Wang ES, Kocent J, et al. NY-ESO-1 Vaccination in Combination with Decitabine Induces Antigen-Specific T-lymphocyte Responses in Patients with Myelodysplastic Syndrome. Clin Cancer Res. 2018;24:1019–29.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Atanackovic D, Luetkens T, Kloth B, Fuchs G, Cao Y, Hildebrandt Y, et al. Cancer-testis antigen expression and its epigenetic modulation in acute myeloid leukemia. Am J Hematol. 2011;86:918–22.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Yao Y, Zhou J, Wang L, Gao X, Ning Q, Jiang M, et al. Increased PRAME-specific CTL killing of acute myeloid leukemia cells by either a novel histone deacetylase inhibitor chidamide alone or combined treatment with decitabine. PLoS One. 2013;8:e70522.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Zhou J, Li Y, Yao Y, Wang L, Gao L, Gao X, et al. The cancer‑testis antigen NXF2 is activated by the hypomethylating agent decitabine in acute leukemia cells in vitro and in vivo. Mol Med Rep. 2013;8:1549–55.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Töpfer K, Kempe S, Müller N, Schmitz M, Bachmann M, Cartellieri M, et al. Tumor evasion from T cell surveillance. J Biomed Biotechnol. 2011;2011:918471.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Kang S, Li Y, Bao Y, Li Y. High-affinity T cell receptors redirect cytokine-activated T cells (CAT) to kill cancer cells. Front Med. 2019;13:69–82.
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Cerón-Maldonado R, Martínez-Tovar A, Ramos-Peñafiel CO, Miranda-Peralta E, Mendoza-Salas I, Mendoza-García E, et al. Detection and analysis of tumour biomarkers to strengthen the diagnosis of acute and chronic leukaemias. Rev Med Hosp Gen (Mex). 2015;78:78–84.
Google Scholar
McCormack E, Adams KJ, Hassan NJ, Kotian A, Lissin NM, Sami M, et al. Bi-specific TCR-anti CD3 redirected T-cell targeting of NY-ESO-1- and LAGE-1-positive tumors. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2013;62:773–85.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Woloszynska-Read A, Mhawech-Fauceglia P, Yu J, Odunsi K, Karpf AR. Intertumor and intratumor NY-ESO-1 expression heterogeneity is associated with promoter-specific and global DNA methylation status in ovarian cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2008;14:3283–90.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Srivastava P, Paluch BE, Matsuzaki J, James SR, Collamat-Lai G, Taverna P, et al. Immunomodulatory action of the DNA methyltransferase inhibitor SGI-110 in epithelial ovarian cancer cells and xenografts. Epigenetics. 2015;10:237–46.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Robbins PF, Li YF, El-Gamil M, Zhao Y, Wargo JA, Zheng Z, et al. Single and dual amino acid substitutions in TCR CDRs can enhance antigen-specific T cell functions. J Immunol. 2008;180:6116–31.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Cany J, Roeven MWH, Hoogstad-van Evert JS, Hobo W, Maas F, Franco Fernandez R. et al. Decitabine enhances targeting of AML cells by CD34(+) progenitor-derived NK cells in NOD/SCID/IL2Rg(null) mice. Blood. 2018;131:202–14.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Baragaño Raneros A, Martín-Palanco V, Fernandez AF, Rodriguez RM, Fraga MF, Lopez-Larrea C, et al. Methylation of NKG2D ligands contributes to immune system evasion in acute myeloid leukemia. Genes Immun. 2015;16:71–82.
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Rohner A, Langenkamp U, Siegler U, Kalberer CP, Wodnar-Filipowicz A. Differentiation-promoting drugs up-regulate NKG2D ligand expression and enhance the susceptibility of acute myeloid leukemia cells to natural killer cell-mediated lysis. Leuk Res. 2007;31:1393–402.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Wang Y, Tong C, Dai H, Wu Z, Han X, Guo Y, et al. Low-dose decitabine priming endows CAR T cells with enhanced and persistent antitumour potential via epigenetic reprogramming. Nat Commun. 2021;12:409.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Elegheert J, Behiels E, Bishop B, Scott S, Woolley RE, Griffiths SC, et al. Lentiviral transduction of mammalian cells for fast, scalable and high-level production of soluble and membrane proteins. Nat Protoc. 2018;13:2991–3017.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Wang B, Guan W, Lv N, Li T, Yu F, Huang Y, et al. Genetic features and efficacy of decitabine-based chemotherapy in elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia. Hematology. 2021;26:371–9.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Lyko F, Brown R. DNA methyltransferase inhibitors and the development of epigenetic cancer therapies. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005;97:1498–506.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Gore SD, Baylin S, Sugar E, Carraway H, Miller CB, Carducci M, et al. Combined DNA methyltransferase and histone deacetylase inhibition in the treatment of myeloid neoplasms. Cancer Res. 2006;66:6361–9.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Acheampong DO, Adokoh CK, Asante DB, Asiamah EA, Barnie PA, Bonsu DOM, et al. Immunotherapy for acute myeloid leukemia (AML): a potent alternative therapy. Biomed Pharmacother. 2018;97:225–32.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Goodyear O, Agathanggelou A, Novitzky-Basso I, Siddique S, McSkeane T, Ryan G, et al. Induction of a CD8+ T-cell response to the MAGE cancer testis antigen by combined treatment with azacitidine and sodium valproate in patients with acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplasia. Blood. 2010;116:1908–18.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Chiappinelli KB, Strissel PL, Desrichard A, Li H, Henke C, Akman B, et al. Inhibiting DNA methylation causes an interferon response in cancer via dsRNA including endogenous retroviruses. Cell. 2015;162:974–86.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Klar AS, Gopinadh J, Kleber S, Wadle A, Renner C. Treatment with 5-Aza-2’-Deoxycytidine induces expression of NY-ESO-1 and facilitates cytotoxic T lymphocyte-mediated tumor cell killing. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0139221.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Leonard SM, Perry T, Woodman CB, Kearns P. Sequential treatment with cytarabine and decitabine has an increased anti-leukemia effect compared to cytarabine alone in xenograft models of childhood acute myeloid leukemia. PLoS One. 2014;9:e87475.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Negrotto S, Ng KP, Jankowska AM, Bodo J, Gopalan B, Guinta K, et al. CpG methylation patterns and decitabine treatment response in acute myeloid leukemia cells and normal hematopoietic precursors. Leukemia. 2012;26:244–54.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Fraietta JA, Lacey SF, Orlando EJ, Pruteanu-Malinici I, Gohil M, Lundh S, et al. Determinants of response and resistance to CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy of chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Nat Med. 2018;24:563–71.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Xu Y, Zhang M, Ramos CA, Durett A, Liu E, Dakhova O. et al. Closely related T-memory stem cells correlate with in vivo expansion of CAR.CD19-T cells and are preserved by IL-7 and IL-15. Blood. 2014;123:3750–9.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Toor AA, Payne KK, Chung HM, Sabo RT, Hazlett AF, Kmieciak M, et al. Epigenetic induction of adaptive immune response in multiple myeloma: sequential azacitidine and lenalidomide generate cancer testis antigen-specific cellular immunity. Br J Haematol. 2012;158:700–11.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Chou J, Voong LN, Mortales CL, Towlerton AM, Pollack SM, Chen X, et al. Epigenetic modulation to enable antigen-specific T-cell therapy of colorectal cancer. J Immunother. 2012;35:131–41.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Weiser TS, Guo ZS, Ohnmacht GA, Parkhurst ML, Tong-On P, Marincola FM, et al. Sequential 5-Aza-2 deoxycytidine-depsipeptide FR901228 treatment induces apoptosis preferentially in cancer cells and facilitates their recognition by cytolytic T lymphocytes specific for NY-ESO-1. J Immunother. 2001;24:151–61.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Dubovsky JA, McNeel DG. Inducible expression of a prostate cancer-testis antigen, SSX-2, following treatment with a DNA methylation inhibitor. Prostate 2007;67:1781–90.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Natsume A, Wakabayashi T, Tsujimura K, Shimato S, Ito M, Kuzushima K, et al. The DNA demethylating agent 5-aza-2’-deoxycytidine activates NY-ESO-1 antigenicity in orthotopic human glioma. Int J Cancer. 2008;122:2542–53.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Odunsi K, Matsuzaki J, James SR, Mhawech-Fauceglia P, Tsuji T, Miller A, et al. Epigenetic potentiation of NY-ESO-1 vaccine therapy in human ovarian cancer. Cancer Immunol Res. 2014;2:37–49.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Tsai HC, Li H, Van Neste L, Cai Y, Robert C, Rassool FV, et al. Transient low doses of DNA-demethylating agents exert durable antitumor effects on hematological and epithelial tumor cells. Cancer Cell. 2012;21:430–46.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Xu Y, Dotti G. Selection bias: maintaining less-differentiated T cells for adoptive immunotherapy. J Clin Invest. 2016;126:35–37.
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Srivastava P, Matsuzaki J, Paluch BE, Brumberger Z, Kaufman S, Karpf AR, et al. NY-ESO-1 vaccination in combination with decitabine for patients with MDS induces CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell responses. Blood. 2015;126:2873–2873.
Article Google Scholar

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by grants Chinese National Major Project for New Drug Innovation (2019ZX09201002003), National Natural Science Foundation of China (82030076, 82070161, 81970151, 81670162, 81870134 and 81900474), Shenzhen Science and Technology Foundation (JCYJ20190808163601776, JCYJ20200109113810154), Shenzhen Key Laboratory Foundation (ZDSYS20200811143757022), Sanming Project of Medicine in Shenzhen (SZSM202111004), Stability support project in colleges and universities of Shenzhen Science and technology innovation Commission (20200830182623001), Shenzhen Peacock Talent Programs Research Start-up Grant (827000644 to XG), and Natural Science Foundation of Shenzhen University General Hospital (SUGH2019QD012).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Department of Hematology and Oncology, International Cancer Center, Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Precision Medicine for Hematological Malignancies, Shenzhen University General Hospital, Shenzhen University Clinical Medical Academy, Shenzhen University Health Science Center, Shenzhen, 518000, Guangdong, China
Synat Kang, Lixin Wang, Lu Xu, Qingzheng Kang, Xuefeng Gao & Li Yu
School of Medicine, Nankai University, Tianjin, 300071, China
Ruiqi Wang
Central Laboratory, Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Precision Medicine for Hematological Malignancies, Shenzhen University General Hospital, Shenzhen, 518000, Guangdong, China
Xuefeng Gao

Authors

Synat Kang
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Lixin Wang
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Lu Xu
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Ruiqi Wang
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Qingzheng Kang
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Xuefeng Gao
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Li Yu
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceptualization: SK, XG, and LY; Data curation: SK, LX, RW, QK, and LX; Formal analysis: SK and XG; Funding acquisition: LY; Investigation: SK, XG, and LW; Methodology: SK, QK, YL, and LX; Resources: LW and LY; Supervision: XG and LY; Writing – original draft, SK; Writing – review & editing: XG and LY.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Xuefeng Gao or Li Yu.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethics approval

This clinical study was proved by the Ethics Committee of Shenzhen University General Hospital with ethics code 2020-002-02 and conducted according to Helsinki Declaration’s principles. Written informed consent was obtained from each participant before specimen collection. The Ethics Committee provided ethical approval for the mouse study with ethics code 2021004.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary materials

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kang, S., Wang, L., Xu, L. et al. Decitabine enhances targeting of AML cells by NY-ESO-1-specific TCR-T cells and promotes the maintenance of effector function and the memory phenotype. Oncogene 41, 4696–4708 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41388-022-02455-y

Download citation

Received: 07 December 2021
Revised: 19 August 2022
Accepted: 25 August 2022
Published: 12 September 2022
Issue Date: 14 October 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41388-022-02455-y