Abstract
Despite paclitaxel’s wide use in cancer treatment, patient response rate is still low and drug resistance is a major clinical obstacle. Through a Phos-tag-based kinome-wide screen, we identified MARK2 as a critical regulator for paclitaxel chemosensitivity in PDAC. We show that MARK2 is phosphorylated by CDK1 in response to antitubulin chemotherapeutics and in unperturbed mitosis. Phosphorylation is essential for MARK2 in regulating mitotic progression and paclitaxel cytotoxicity in PDAC cells. Mechanistically, our findings also suggest that MARK2 controls paclitaxel chemosensitivity by regulating class IIa HDACs. MARK2 directly phosphorylates HDAC4 specifically during antitubulin treatment. Phosphorylated HDAC4 promotes YAP activation and controls expression of YAP target genes induced by paclitaxel. Importantly, combination of HDAC inhibition and paclitaxel overcomes chemoresistance in organoid culture and preclinical PDAC animal models. The expression levels of MARK2, HDACs, and YAP are upregulated and positively correlated in PDAC patients. Inhibition of MARK2 or class IIa HDACs potentiates paclitaxel cytotoxicity by inducing mitotic abnormalities in PDAC cells. Together, our findings identify the MARK2-HDAC axis as a druggable target for overcoming chemoresistance in PDAC.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 50 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $5.18 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Henriques AC, Ribeiro D, Pedrosa J, Sarmento B, Silva PMA, Bousbaa H. Mitosis inhibitors in anticancer therapy: When blocking the exit becomes a solution. Cancer Lett. 2019;440-441:64–81.
Dominguez-Brauer C, Thu KL, Mason JM, Blaser H, Bray MR, Mak TW. Targeting mitosis in cancer: emerging strategies. Mol Cell. 2015;60:524–36.
Jackson JR, Patrick DR, Dar MM, Huang PS. Targeted anti-mitotic therapies: can we improve on tubulin agents? Nat Rev Cancer. 2007;7:107–17.
Janssen A, Medema RH. Mitosis as an anti-cancer target. Oncogene. 2011;30:2799–809.
Rahib L, Smith BD, Aizenberg R, Rosenzweig AB, Fleshman JM, Matrisian LM. Projecting cancer incidence and deaths to 2030: the unexpected burden of thyroid, liver, and pancreas cancers in the United States. Cancer Res. 2014;74:2913–21.
Sarantis P, Koustas E, Papadimitropoulou A, Papavassiliou AG, Karamouzis MV. Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: Treatment hurdles, tumor microenvironment and immunotherapy. World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2020;12:173–81.
Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2020. CA Cancer J Clin. 2020;70:7–30.
Adamska A, Elaskalani O, Emmanouilidi A, Kim M, Abdol Razak NB, Metharom P, et al. Molecular and cellular mechanisms of chemoresistance in pancreatic cancer. Adv Biol Regul. 2018;68:77–87.
Von Hoff DD, Ramanathan RK, Borad MJ, Laheru DA, Smith LS, Wood TE, et al. Gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel is an active regimen in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: a phase I/II trial. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:4548–54.
Von Hoff DD, Ervin T, Arena FP, Chiorean EG, Infante J, Moore M, et al. Increased survival in pancreatic cancer with nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:1691–703.
Sinn M, Bahra M, Liersch T, Gellert K, Messmann H, Bechstein W, et al. CONKO-005: adjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine plus erlotinib versus gemcitabine alone in patients after R0 resection of pancreatic cancer: a multicenter randomized phase III trial. J Clin Oncol 2017;35:3330–7.
Conroy T, Hammel P, Hebbar M, Ben Abdelghani M, Wei AC, Raoul JL, et al. FOLFIRINOX or gemcitabine as adjuvant therapy for pancreatic cancer. N Engl J Med 2018;379:2395–406.
Ma WW, Hidalgo M. The winning formulation: the development of paclitaxel in pancreatic cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2013;19:5572–9.
Tang EI, Mruk DD, Cheng CY. MAP/microtubule affinity-regulating kinases, microtubule dynamics, and spermatogenesis. J Endocrinol. 2013;217:R13–23.
Drewes G, Ebneth A, Preuss U, Mandelkow EM, Mandelkow E. MARK, a novel family of protein kinases that phosphorylate microtubule-associated proteins and trigger microtubule disruption. Cell. 1997;89:297–308.
Ahrari S, Mogharrab N, Navapour L. Interconversion of inactive to active conformation of MARK2: Insights from molecular modeling and molecular dynamics simulation. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2017;630:66–80.
Natalia MA, Alejandro GT, Virginia TJ, Alvarez-Salas LM. MARK1 is a Novel Target for miR-125a-5p: implications for cell migration in cervical tumor. Cells Microrna. 2018;7:54–61.
Goodwin JM, Svensson RU, Lou HJ, Winslow MM, Turk BE, Shaw RJ. An AMPK-independent signaling pathway downstream of the LKB1 tumor suppressor controls Snail1 and metastatic potential. Mol Cell. 2014;55:436–50.
Hubaux R, Thu KL, Vucic EA, Pikor LA, Kung SH, Martinez VD, et al. Microtubule affinity-regulating kinase 2 is associated with DNA damage response and cisplatin resistance in non-small cell lung cancer. Int J Cancer. 2015;137:2072–82.
Heidary Arash E, Shiban A, Song S, Attisano L. MARK4 inhibits Hippo signaling to promote proliferation and migration of breast cancer cells. EMBO Rep. 2017;18:420–36.
Kato T, Satoh S, Okabe H, Kitahara O, Ono K, Kihara C, et al. Isolation of a novel human gene, MARKL1, homologous to MARK3 and its involvement in hepatocellular carcinogenesis. Neoplasia. 2001;3:4–9.
Beghini A, Magnani I, Roversi G, Piepoli T, Di Terlizzi S, Moroni RF, et al. The neural progenitor-restricted isoform of the MARK4 gene in 19q13.2 is upregulated in human gliomas and overexpressed in a subset of glioblastoma cell lines. Oncogene. 2003;22:2581–91.
Jenardhanan P, Mannu J, Mathur PP. The structural analysis of MARK4 and the exploration of specific inhibitors for the MARK family: a computational approach to obstruct the role of MARK4 in prostate cancer progression. Mol Biosyst. 2014;10:1845–68.
Magnani I, Novielli C, Fontana L, Tabano S, Rovina D, Moroni RF, et al. Differential signature of the centrosomal MARK4 isoforms in glioma. Anal Cell Pathol. 2011;34:319–38.
Pardo OE, Castellano L, Munro CE, Hu Y, Mauri F, Krell J, et al. miR-515-5p controls cancer cell migration through MARK4 regulation. EMBO Rep. 2016;17:570–84.
Kwan J, Sczaniecka A, Heidary Arash E, Nguyen L, Chen CC, Ratkovic S, et al. DLG5 connects cell polarity and Hippo signaling protein networks by linking PAR-1 with MST1/2. Genes Dev. 2016;30:2696–709.
Mohseni M, Sun J, Lau A, Curtis S, Goldsmith J, Fox VL, et al. A genetic screen identifies an LKB1-MARK signalling axis controlling the Hippo-YAP pathway. Nat Cell Biol. 2014;16:108–17.
Huang HL, Wang S, Yin MX, Dong L, Wang C, Wu W, et al. Par-1 regulates tissue growth by influencing hippo phosphorylation status and hippo-salvador association. PLoS Biol. 2013;11:e1001620.
Harvey KF, Zhang X, Thomas DM. The Hippo pathway and human cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2013;13:246–57.
Yu FX, Zhao B, Guan KL. Hippo pathway in organ size control, tissue homeostasis, and cancer. Cell. 2015;163:811–28.
Varelas X. The Hippo pathway effectors TAZ and YAP in development, homeostasis and disease. Development. 2014;141:1614–26.
Fu V, Plouffe SW, Guan KL. The Hippo pathway in organ development, homeostasis, and regeneration. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2018;49:99–107.
Maugeri-Sacca M, De Maria R. The Hippo pathway in normal development and cancer. Pharmacol Ther. 2018;186:60–72.
Dequiedt F, Martin M, Von Blume J, Vertommen D, Lecomte E, Mari N, et al. New role for hPar-1 kinases EMK and C-TAK1 in regulating localization and activity of class IIa histone deacetylases. Mol Cell Biol. 2006;26:7086–102.
Grozinger CM, Schreiber SL. Regulation of histone deacetylase 4 and 5 and transcriptional activity by 14-3-3-dependent cellular localization. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000;97:7835–40.
Wang AH, Kruhlak MJ, Wu J, Bertos NR, Vezmar M, Posner BI, et al. Regulation of histone deacetylase 4 by binding of 14-3-3 proteins. Mol Cell Biol. 2000;20:6904–12.
Roche J, Bertrand P. Inside HDACs with more selective HDAC inhibitors. Eur J Med Chem. 2016;121:451–83.
Hessmann E, Johnsen SA, Siveke JT, Ellenrieder V. Epigenetic treatment of pancreatic cancer: is there a therapeutic perspective on the horizon? Gut. 2017;66:168–79.
Suraweera A, O’Byrne KJ, Richard DJ. Combination therapy with histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACi) for the treatment of cancer: achieving the full therapeutic potential of HDACi. Front Oncol. 2018;8:92.
Chen X, Stauffer S, Chen Y, Dong J. Ajuba phosphorylation by CDK1 promotes cell proliferation and tumorigenesis. J Biol Chem. 2016;291:14761–72.
Duong-Ly KC, Peterson JR. The human kinome and kinase inhibition. Curr Protoc Pharmacol. 2013;Chapter 2:Unit2.9.
Robinson DR, Wu YM, Lin SF. The protein tyrosine kinase family of the human genome. Oncogene. 2000;19:5548–57.
Stauffer S, Zeng Y, Zhou J, Chen X, Chen Y, Dong J. CDK1-mediated mitotic phosphorylation of PBK is involved in cytokinesis and inhibits its oncogenic activity. Cell Signal. 2017;39:74–83.
Chen X, Chen Y, Dong J. MST2 phosphorylation at serine 385 in mitosis inhibits its tumor suppressing activity. Cell Signal. 2016;28:1826–32.
Stauffer S, Zeng Y, Santos M, Zhou J, Chen Y, Dong J (2019) Cyclin-dependent kinase 1-mediated AMPK phosphorylation regulates chromosome alignment and mitotic progression. J Cell Sci. 2019;132. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.236000.
Wang Z, Chen X, Zhong MZ, Yang S, Zhou J, Klinkebiel DL, et al. Cyclin-dependent kinase 1-mediated phosphorylation of YES links mitotic arrest and apoptosis during antitubulin chemotherapy. Cell Signal. 2018;52:137–46.
Woodring PJ, Hunter T, Wang JY. Mitotic phosphorylation rescues Abl from F-actin-mediated inhibition. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:10318–25.
Ma A, Richardson A, Schaefer EM, Parsons JT. Serine phosphorylation of focal adhesion kinase in interphase and mitosis: a possible role in modulating binding to p130(Cas). Mol Biol Cell. 2001;12:1–12.
Kiyokawa N, Lee EK, Karunagaran D, Lin SY, Hung MC. Mitosis-specific negative regulation of epidermal growth factor receptor, triggered by a decrease in ligand binding and dimerization, can be overcome by overexpression of receptor. J Biol Chem. 1997;272:18656–65.
Bagrodia S, Chackalaparampil I, Kmiecik TE, Shalloway D. Altered tyrosine 527 phosphorylation and mitotic activation of p60c-src. Nature. 1991;349:172–5.
Nigg EA. Cellular substrates of p34(cdc2) and its companion cyclin-dependent kinases. Trends Cell Biol. 1993;3:296–301.
Dong J, Feldmann G, Huang J, Wu S, Zhang N, Comerford SA, et al. Elucidation of a universal size-control mechanism in Drosophila and mammals. Cell. 2007;130:1120–33.
Zhao B, Wei X, Li W, Udan RS, Yang Q, Kim J, et al. Inactivation of YAP oncoprotein by the Hippo pathway is involved in cell contact inhibition and tissue growth control. Genes Dev. 2007;21:2747–61.
Zhao B, Ye X, Yu J, Li L, Li W, Li S, et al. TEAD mediates YAP-dependent gene induction and growth control. Genes Dev. 2008;22:1962–71.
Aylon Y, Michael D, Shmueli A, Yabuta N, Nojima H, Oren M. A positive feedback loop between the p53 and Lats2 tumor suppressors prevents tetraploidization. Genes Dev. 2006;20:2687–700.
Zhao Y, Yang X. Regulation of sensitivity of tumor cells to antitubulin drugs by Cdk1-TAZ signalling. Oncotarget. 2015;6:21906–17.
Tsai HC, Huang CY, Su HL, Tang CH. CTGF increases drug resistance to paclitaxel by upregulating survivin expression in human osteosarcoma cells. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2014;1843:846–54.
Lens SM, Wolthuis RM, Klompmaker R, Kauw J, Agami R, Brummelkamp T, et al. Survivin is required for a sustained spindle checkpoint arrest in response to lack of tension. EMBO J. 2003;22:2934–47.
Zhou J, Zeng Y, Cui L, Chen X, Stauffer S, Wang Z, et al. Zyxin promotes colon cancer tumorigenesis in a mitotic phosphorylation-dependent manner and through CDK8-mediated YAP activation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2018;115:E6760–9.
Sild M, Booij L. Histone deacetylase 4 (HDAC4): a new player in anorexia nervosa?. Mol Psychiatry. 2019;24:1425–1434.
Wang Z, Qin G, Zhao TC. HDAC4: mechanism of regulation and biological functions. Epigenomics. 2014;6:139–50.
Wanek J, Gaisberger M, Beyreis M, Mayr C, Helm K, Primavesi F, et al. Pharmacological Inhibition of Class IIA HDACs by LMK-235 in Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumor Cells. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19103128.
Ni X, Li L, Pan G. HDAC inhibitor-induced drug resistance involving ATP-binding cassette transporters (Review). Oncol Lett. 2015;9:515–21.
Torres MP, Rachagani S, Souchek JJ, Mallya K, Johansson SL, Batra SK. Novel pancreatic cancer cell lines derived from genetically engineered mouse models of spontaneous pancreatic adenocarcinoma: applications in diagnosis and therapy. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e80580.
Weaver BA. How Taxol/paclitaxel kills cancer cells. Mol Biol Cell. 2014;25:2677–81.
Zasadil LM, Andersen KA, Yeum D, Rocque GB, Wilke LG, Tevaarwerk AJ, et al. Cytotoxicity of paclitaxel in breast cancer is due to chromosome missegregation on multipolar spindles. Sci Transl Med. 2014;6:229ra43.
Dietrich CS 3rd, Greenberg VL, DeSimone CP, Modesitt SC, van Nagell JR, Craven R, et al. Suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid (SAHA) potentiates paclitaxel-induced apoptosis in ovarian cancer cell lines. Gynecol Oncol. 2010;116:126–30.
Wang L, Li H, Ren Y, Zou S, Fang W, Jiang X, et al. Targeting HDAC with a novel inhibitor effectively reverses paclitaxel resistance in non-small cell lung cancer via multiple mechanisms. Cell Death Dis. 2016;7:e2063.
Dowdy SC, Jiang S, Zhou XC, Hou X, Jin F, Podratz KC, et al. Histone deacetylase inhibitors and paclitaxel cause synergistic effects on apoptosis and microtubule stabilization in papillary serous endometrial cancer cells. Mol Cancer Ther. 2006;5:2767–76.
Koutsounas I, Giaginis C, Theocharis S. Histone deacetylase inhibitors and pancreatic cancer: are there any promising clinical trials? World J Gastroenterol. 2013;19:1173–81.
Bayat Mokhtari R, Homayouni TS, Baluch N, Morgatskaya E, Kumar S, Das B, et al. Combination therapy in combating cancer. Oncotarget. 2017;8:38022–43.
Yang CH, Horwitz SB. Taxol((R)): The first microtubule stabilizing agent. Int J Mol Sci. 2017;18. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms18081733.
Hornbeck PV, Zhang B, Murray B, Kornhauser JM, Latham V, Skrzypek E. PhosphoSitePlus, 2014: mutations, PTMs and recalibrations. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43:D512–20.
Lee KM, Yasuda H, Hollingsworth MA, Ouellette MM. Notch 2-positive progenitors with the intrinsic ability to give rise to pancreatic ductal cells. Lab Investig. 2005;85:1003–12.
Zhang L, Yang S, Chen X, Stauffer S, Yu F, Lele SM, et al. The Hippo pathway effector YAP regulates motility, invasion, and castration-resistant growth of prostate cancer cells. Mol Cell Biol. 2015;35:1350–62.
Xiao L, Chen Y, Ji M, Dong J. KIBRA regulates Hippo signaling activity via interactions with large tumor suppressor kinases. J Biol Chem. 2011;286:7788–96.
Zhang L, Iyer J, Chowdhury A, Ji M, Xiao L, Yang S, et al. KIBRA regulates aurora kinase activity and is required for precise chromosome alignment during mitosis. J Biol Chem. 2012;287:34069–77.
Boj SF, Hwang CI, Baker LA, Chio II, Engle DD, Corbo V, et al. Organoid models of human and mouse ductal pancreatic cancer. Cell. 2015;160:324–38.
Qiu W, Su GH. Development of orthotopic pancreatic tumor mouse models. Methods Mol Biol. 2013;980:215–23.
Acknowledgements
We thank Dr. Xiao-long Yang (Queens University) for the TetO-shCDK1 HeLa cell line. All fluorescence images were acquired by a Zeiss LSM 800 microscope and processed with accompanying software at the Advanced Microscopy Core at the University of Nebraska Medical Center. Research in the Dong laboratory is supported by Fred & Pamela Buffett Cancer Center Support Grant (P30 CA036727) and R01 GM109066 from the the National Institutes of Health (NIH). We are very grateful to Dr. Joyce Solheim for critical reading and comments on the paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
JD and YZ designed the study and wrote the paper. YZ, LY, JZ, RZ, YX, TH, and YC performed the experiments, analyzed the data, and interpreted the results. YC also provided technical support. Feng Y, PKS, and ARB contributed to data analysis and results interpretation. Fang Y performed statistical analysis. SKB provided the mouse PDAC cell lines. All authors approved the paper prior to submission.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zeng, Y., Yin, L., Zhou, J. et al. MARK2 regulates chemotherapeutic responses through class IIa HDAC-YAP axis in pancreatic cancer. Oncogene 41, 3859–3875 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41388-022-02399-3
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41388-022-02399-3
This article is cited by
-
Role of MARK2 in the nervous system and cancer
Cancer Gene Therapy (2024)
-
Emerging therapeutic strategies in cancer therapy by HDAC inhibition as the chemotherapeutic potent and epigenetic regulator
Medical Oncology (2024)