Quaking orchestrates a post-transcriptional regulatory network of endothelial cell cycle progression critical to angiogenesis and metastasis

Abstract

Angiogenesis is critical to cancer development and metastasis. However, anti-angiogenic agents have only had modest therapeutic success, partly due to an incomplete understanding of tumor endothelial cell (EC) biology. We previously reported that the microRNA (miR)-200 family inhibits metastasis through regulation of tumor angiogenesis, but the underlying molecular mechanisms are poorly characterized. Here, using integrated bioinformatics approaches, we identified the RNA-binding protein (RBP) quaking (QKI) as a leading miR-200b endothelial target with previously unappreciated roles in the tumor microenvironment in lung cancer. In lung cancer samples, both miR-200b suppression and QKI overexpression corresponded with tumor ECs relative to normal ECs, and QKI silencing phenocopied miR-200b-mediated inhibition of sprouting. Additionally, both cancer cell and endothelial QKI expression in patient samples significantly corresponded with poor survival and correlated with angiogenic indices. QKI supported EC function by stabilizing cyclin D1 (CCND1) mRNA to promote EC G1/S cell cycle transition and proliferation. Both nanoparticle-mediated RNA interference of endothelial QKI expression and palbociclib blockade of CCND1 function potently inhibited metastasis in concert with significant effects on tumor vasculature. Altogether, this work demonstrates the clinical relevance and therapeutic potential of a novel, actionable miR/RBP axis in tumor angiogenesis and metastasis.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

References

  1. 1.

    Gupta GP, Massague J. Cancer metastasis: building a framework. Cell. 2006;127:679–95.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Folkman J. Tumor angiogenesis: therapeutic implications. N Engl J Med. 1971;285:1182–6.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Chambers AF, Groom AC, MacDonald IC. Dissemination and growth of cancer cells in metastatic sites. Nat Rev Cancer. 2002;2:563–72.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Bergers G, Hanahan D. Modes of resistance to anti-angiogenic therapy. Nat Rev Cancer. 2008;8:592–603.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Bottsford-Miller JN, Coleman RL, Sood AK. Resistance and escape from antiangiogenesis therapy: clinical implications and future strategies. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:4026–34.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Pecot CV, Rupaimoole R, Yang D, Akbani R, Ivan C, Lu C, et al. Tumour angiogenesis regulation by the miR-200 family. Nat Commun. 2013;4:2427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Chan YC, Khanna S, Roy S, Sen CK. miR-200b targets Ets-1 and is down-regulated by hypoxia to induce angiogenic response of endothelial cells. J Biol Chem. 2011;286:2047–56.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Chan YC, Roy S, Khanna S, Sen CK. Downregulation of endothelial microRNA-200b supports cutaneous wound angiogenesis by desilencing GATA binding protein 2 and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2012;32:1372–82.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Ding Y, Hu Z, Luan J, Lv X, Yuan D, Xie P, et al. Protective effect of miR-200b/c by inhibiting vasohibin-2 in human retinal microvascular endothelial cells. Life Sci. 2017;191:245–52.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Gill JG, Langer EM, Lindsley RC, Cai M, Murphy TL, Murphy KM. Snail promotes the cell-autonomous generation of Flk1(+) endothelial cells through the repression of the microRNA-200 family. Stem Cells Dev. 2012;21:167–76.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Magenta A, Cencioni C, Fasanaro P, Zaccagnini G, Greco S, Sarra-Ferraris G, et al. miR-200c is upregulated by oxidative stress and induces endothelial cell apoptosis and senescence via ZEB1 inhibition. Cell Death Differ. 2011;18:1628–39.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Kondo T, Furuta T, Mitsunaga K, Ebersole TA, Shichiri M, Wu J, et al. Genomic organization and expression analysis of the mouse qkI locus. Mamm Genome. 1999;10:662–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Teplova M, Hafner M, Teplov D, Essig K, Tuschl T, Patel DJ. Structure-function studies of STAR family Quaking proteins bound to their in vivo RNA target sites. Genes Dev. 2013;27:928–40.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Hardy RJ, Loushin CL, Friedrich VL Jr., Chen Q, Ebersole TA, Lazzarini RA, et al. Neural cell type-specific expression of QKI proteins is altered in quakingviable mutant mice. J Neurosci. 1996;16:7941–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Wu J, Zhou L, Tonissen K, Tee R, Artzt K. The quaking I-5 protein (QKI-5) has a novel nuclear localization signal and shuttles between the nucleus and the cytoplasm. J Biol Chem. 1999;274:29202–10.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Wu JI, Reed RB, Grabowski PJ, Artzt K. Function of quaking in myelination: regulation of alternative splicing. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002;99:4233–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    de Bruin RG, Shiue L, Prins J, de Boer HC, Singh A, Fagg WS, et al. Quaking promotes monocyte differentiation into pro-atherogenic macrophages by controlling pre-mRNA splicing and gene expression. Nat Commun. 2016;7:10846.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Larocque D, Galarneau A, Liu HN, Scott M, Almazan G, Richard S. Protection of p27 (Kip1) mRNA by quaking RNA binding proteins promotes oligodendrocyte differentiation. Nat Neurosci. 2005;8:27–33.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Zearfoss NR, Clingman CC, Farley BM, McCoig LM, Ryder SP. Quaking regulates Hnrnpa1 expression through its 3' UTR in oligodendrocyte precursor cells. PLoS Genet. 2011;7:e1001269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Li Z, Zhang Y, Li D, Feng Y. Destabilization and mislocalization of myelin basic protein mRNAs in quaking dysmyelination lacking the QKI RNA-binding proteins. J Neurosci. 2000;20:4944–53.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Saccomanno L, Loushin C, Jan E, Punkay E, Artzt K, Goodwin EB. The STAR protein QKI-6 is a translational repressor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999;96:12605–10.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Larocque D, Pilotte J, Chen T, Cloutier F, Massie B, Pedraza L, et al. Nuclear retention of MBP mRNAs in the quaking viable mice. Neuron. 2002;36:815–29.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Noveroske JK, Lai L, Gaussin V, Northrop JL, Nakamura H, Hirschi KK, et al. Quaking is essential for blood vessel development. Genesis. 2002;32:218–30.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Li Z, Takakura N, Oike Y, Imanaka T, Araki K, Suda T, et al. Defective smooth muscle development in qkI-deficient mice. Dev Growth Differ. 2003;45:449–62.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Bohnsack BL, Lai L, Northrop JL, Justice MJ, Hirschi KK. Visceral endoderm function is regulated by quaking and required for vascular development. Genesis. 2006;44:93–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Park SM, Gaur AB, Lengyel E, Peter ME. The miR-200 family determines the epithelial phenotype of cancer cells by targeting the E-cadherin repressors ZEB1 and ZEB2. Genes Dev. 2008;22:894–907.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Ji H, Ramsey MR, Hayes DN, Fan C, McNamara K, Kozlowski P, et al. LKB1 modulates lung cancer differentiation and metastasis. Nature. 2007;448:807–10.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Gregory PA, Bert AG, Paterson EL, Barry SC, Tsykin A, Farshid G, et al. The miR-200 family and miR-205 regulate epithelial to mesenchymal transition by targeting ZEB1 and SIP1. Nat Cell Biol. 2008;10:593–601.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Cochrane A, Kelaini S, Tsifaki M, Bojdo J, Vila-Gonzalez M, Drehmer D, et al. Quaking is a key regulator of endothelial cell differentiation, neovascularization, and angiogenesis. Stem Cells. 2017;35:952–66.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    de Bruin RG, van der Veer EP, Prins J, Lee DH, Dane MJ, Zhang H, et al. The RNA-binding protein quaking maintains endothelial barrier function and affects VE-cadherin and beta-catenin protein expression. Sci Rep. 2016;6:21643.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    van Mil A, Grundmann S, Goumans MJ, Lei Z, Oerlemans MI, Jaksani S, et al. MicroRNA-214 inhibits angiogenesis by targeting Quaking and reducing angiogenic growth factor release. Cardiovasc Res. 2012;93:655–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Pillman KA, Phillips CA, Roslan S, Toubia J, Dredge BK, Bert AG, et al. miR-200/375 control epithelial plasticity-associated alternative splicing by repressing the RNA-binding protein Quaking. EMBO J.2018;37:e99016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Nakatsu MN, Davis J, Hughes CC. Optimized fibrin gel bead assay for the study of angiogenesis. J Vis Exp. 2007;3:186.

    Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Azam SH, Smith M, Somasundaram V, Pecot CV. Incorporating pericytes into an endothelial cell bead sprouting assay. J Vis Exp. 2018;132:e57309.

  35. 35.

    Zhou X, Li X, Sun C, Shi C, Hua D, Yu L, et al. Quaking-5 suppresses aggressiveness of lung cancer cells through inhibiting beta-catenin signaling pathway. Oncotarget. 2017;8:82174–84.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Zong FY, Fu X, Wei WJ, Luo YG, Heiner M, Cao LJ, et al. The RNA-binding protein QKI suppresses cancer-associated aberrant splicing. PLoS Genet. 2014;10:e1004289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Chen AJ, Paik JH, Zhang H, Shukla SA, Mortensen R, Hu J, et al. STAR RNA-binding protein Quaking suppresses cancer via stabilization of specific miRNA. Genes Dev. 2012;26:1459–72.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Akerman M, David-Eden H, Pinter RY, Mandel-Gutfreund Y. A computational approach for genome-wide mapping of splicing factor binding sites. Genome Biol. 2009;10:R30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Fry DW, Harvey PJ, Keller PR, Elliott WL, Meade M, Trachet E, et al. Specific inhibition of cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 by PD 0332991 and associated antitumor activity in human tumor xenografts. Mol Cancer Ther. 2004;3:1427–38.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Gibbons DL, Lin W, Creighton CJ, Rizvi ZH, Gregory PA, Goodall GJ, et al. Contextual extracellular cues promote tumor cell EMT and metastasis by regulating miR-200 family expression. Genes Dev. 2009;23:2140–51.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Harrison EB, Azam SH, Pecot CV. Targeting accessories to the crime: nanoparticle nucleic acid delivery to the tumor microenvironment. Front Pharmacol. 2018;9:307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Lu C, Han HD, Mangala LS, Ali-Fehmi R, Newton CS, Ozbun L, et al. Regulation of tumor angiogenesis by EZH2. Cancer Cell. 2010;18:185–97.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Welch-Reardon KM, Wu N, Hughes CC. A role for partial endothelial-mesenchymal transitions in angiogenesis? Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2015;35:303–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Zhang Y, Lu Z, Ku L, Chen Y, Wang H, Feng Y. Tyrosine phosphorylation of QKI mediates developmental signals to regulate mRNA metabolism. EMBO J. 2003;22:1801–10.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Conn SJ, Pillman KA, Toubia J, Conn VM, Salmanidis M, Phillips CA, et al. The RNA binding protein quaking regulates formation of circRNAs. Cell . 2015;160:1125–34.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Landen CN Jr., Chavez-Reyes A, Bucana C, Schmandt R, Deavers MT, Lopez-Berestein G, et al. Therapeutic EphA2 gene targeting in vivo using neutral liposomal small interfering RNA delivery. Cancer Res. 2005;65:6910–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Hlatky L, Hahnfeldt P, Folkman J. Clinical application of antiangiogenic therapy: microvessel density, what it does and doesn't tell us. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002;94:883–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Winkler F, Kozin SV, Tong RT, Chae SS, Booth MF, Garkavtsev I, et al. Kinetics of vascular normalization by VEGFR2 blockade governs brain tumor response to radiation: role of oxygenation, angiopoietin-1, and matrix metalloproteinases. Cancer Cell. 2004;6:553–63.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Goel S, Gupta N, Walcott BP, Snuderl M, Kesler CT, Kirkpatrick ND, et al. Effects of vascular-endothelial protein tyrosine phosphatase inhibition on breast cancer vasculature and metastatic progression. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2013;105:1188–201.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Wong PP, Demircioglu F, Ghazaly E, Alrawashdeh W, Stratford MR, Scudamore CL, et al. Dual-action combination therapy enhances angiogenesis while reducing tumor growth and spread. Cancer Cell. 2015;27:123–37.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Wong PP, Bodrug N, Hodivala-Dilke KM. Exploring novel methods for modulating tumor blood vessels in cancer treatment. Curr Biol. 2016;26:R1161–R6.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Noguera-Troise I, Daly C, Papadopoulos NJ, Coetzee S, Boland P, Gale NW, et al. Blockade of Dll4 inhibits tumour growth by promoting non-productive angiogenesis. Nature. 2006;444:1032–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Vasudev NS, Reynolds AR. Anti-angiogenic therapy for cancer: current progress, unresolved questions and future directions. Angiogenesis. 2014;17:471–94.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Paez-Ribes M, Allen E, Hudock J, Takeda T, Okuyama H, Vinals F, et al. Antiangiogenic therapy elicits malignant progression of tumors to increased local invasion and distant metastasis. Cancer Cell. 2009;15:220–31.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Ebos JM, Lee CR, Cruz-Munoz W, Bjarnason GA, Christensen JG, Kerbel RS. Accelerated metastasis after short-term treatment with a potent inhibitor of tumor angiogenesis. Cancer Cell. 2009;15:232–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Carmeliet P, Jain RK. Principles and mechanisms of vessel normalization for cancer and other angiogenic diseases. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2011;10:417–27.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Jain RK. Antiangiogenesis strategies revisited: from starving tumors to alleviating hypoxia. Cancer Cell. 2014;26:605–22.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Santo L, Siu KT, Raje N. Targeting cyclin-dependent kinases and cell cycle progression in human cancers. Semin Oncol. 2015;42:788–800.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Griffin MJ. Synchronization of some human cell strains by serum and calcium starvation. Vitro. 1976;12:393–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Lamprecht MR, Sabatini DM, Carpenter AE. CellProfiler: free, versatile software for automated biological image analysis. Biotechniques. 2007;42:71–5.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to especially thank members of the Victoria Bautch laboratory for their advice on performing the endothelial sprouting assay, the UNC Animal Histopathology Core, the UNC Biomedical Research Imaging Center, Janet Dow from the UNC Flow Cytometry Core Facility, and the Tissue Pathology Lab Core. The authors would also like to thank Adolfo Alfonso for providing the ZsGreen fluorescent labeled 10T1/2 (pericyte) cells used in the pericyte-coated sprouting assay. C.V.P. was supported in part by the National Institutes of Health R01-CA215075, R01-CA042978 and U54-CA198999, a Mentored Research Scholar Grants in Applied and Clinical Research (MRSG-14-222-01-RMC) from the American Cancer Society, the Jimmy V Foundation Scholar award, the UCRF Innovator Award, the Stuart Scott V Foundation/Lung Cancer Initiative Award for Clinical Research, the University Cancer Research Fund, the Lung Cancer Research Foundation, the Free to Breathe Metastasis Research Award and the Susan G. Komen Career Catalyst Award. S.H.A. was supported in part by a grant from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences under award 5T32 GM007092. E.B.H. was supported in part by a grant from the National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health under award number T32CA196589. AKS was supported in part by The American Cancer Society Research Professor Award and grants from the National Cancer Institute (P50 CA217685 and R35 CA209904). The UNC Flow Cytometry Core Facility and Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center Animal Histopathology and Animal Studies Cores are all supported in part by a National Cancer Institute Center Core Support Grant (CA016086) to the UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center. The UNC Flow Cytometry Core Facility is also supported in part by the North Carolina Biotech Center Institutional Support Grant 2012-IDG-1006.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conception: CVP; Experimental design and methodology: SHA, AP, EBH, PLL, TAW, CVP; Acquisition of data: SHA, AP, EBH, PLL, TAW, AB, SM, XL, CVP; Analysis and interpretation of data (e.g., statistical analysis, biostatistics, computational analysis): AP, SHA, CVP; Writing, review, and/or revision of the manuscript: All authors; Administrative, technical, or material support (i.e., reporting or organizing data, constructing databases): CVP, AP; Study supervision: CVP.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chad V. Pecot.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Azam, S.H., Porrello, A., Harrison, E.B. et al. Quaking orchestrates a post-transcriptional regulatory network of endothelial cell cycle progression critical to angiogenesis and metastasis. Oncogene 38, 5191–5210 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41388-019-0786-6

Download citation

Further reading

Search