Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

MDM2-mediated degradation of WRN promotes cellular senescence in a p53-independent manner

Abstract

MDM2 (Murine double minute 2) acts as a key repressor for p53-mediated tumor-suppressor functions, which includes cellular senescence. We found that MDM2 can promote cellular senescence by modulating WRN stability. Werner syndrome (WS), caused by mutations of the WRN gene, is an autosomal recessive disease, which is characterized by premature aging. Loss of WRN function induces cellular senescence in human cancer cells. Here, we found that MDM2 acts as an E3 ligase for WRN protein. MDM2 interacts with WRN both in vivo and in vitro. MDM2 induces ubiquitination of WRN and dramatically downregulates the levels of WRN protein in human cells. During DNA damage response, WRN is translocated to the nucleoplasm to facilitate its DNA repair functions; however, it is degraded by the MDM2-mediated ubiquitination pathway. Moreover, the senescent phenotype induced by DNA damage reagents, such as Etoposide, is at least in part mediated by MDM2-dependent WRN degradation as it can be significantly attenuated by ectopic expression of WRN. These results show that MDM2 is critically involved in regulating WRN function via ubiquitin-dependent degradation and reveal an unexpected role of MDM2 in promoting cellular senescence through a p53-independent manner.

This is a preview of subscription content

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

$32.00

All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

References

  1. Muftuoglu M, Oshima J, von Kobbe C, Cheng WH, Leistritz DF, Bohr VA. The clinical characteristics of Werner syndrome: molecular and biochemical diagnosis. Hum Genet. 2008;124:369–77.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bernstein KA, Gangloff S, Rothstein R. The RecQ DNA helicases in DNA repair. Annu Rev Genet. 2010;44:393–417.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bohr VA, Cooper M, Orren D, Machwe A, Piotrowski J, Sommers J, et al. Werner syndrome protein: biochemical properties and functional interactions. Exp Gerontol. 2000;35:695–702.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Huang S, Li B, Gray MD, Oshima J, Mian IS, Campisi J. The premature ageing syndrome protein, WRN, is a 3’-- > 5’ exonuclease. Nat Genet. 1998;20:114–6.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Croteau DL, Popuri V, Opresko PL, Bohr VA. Human RecQ helicases in DNA repair, recombination, and replication. Annu Rev Biochem. 2014;83:519–52.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ghosh A, Rossi ML, Aulds J, Croteau D, Bohr VA. Telomeric D-loops containing 8-oxo-2’-deoxyguanosine are preferred substrates for Werner and Bloom syndrome helicases and are bound by POT1. J Biol Chem. 2009;284:31074–84.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Poot M, Hoehn H, Runger TM, Martin GM. Impaired S-phase transit of Werner syndrome cells expressed in lymphoblastoid cell lines. Exp Cell Res. 1992;202:267–73.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Crabbe L, Verdun RE, Haggblom CI, Karlseder J. Defective telomere lagging strand synthesis in cells lacking WRN helicase activity. Science. 2004;306:1951–3.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sidorova JM, Li N, Folch A, Monnat RJ Jr. The RecQ helicase WRN is required for normal replication fork progression after DNA damage or replication fork arrest. Cell Cycle. 2008;7:796–807.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lebel M, Leder P. A deletion within the murine Werner syndrome helicase induces sensitivity to inhibitors of topoisomerase and loss of cellular proliferative capacity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998;95:13097–102.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Constantinou A, Tarsounas M, Karow JK, Brosh RM, Bohr VA, Hickson ID, et al. Werner’s syndrome protein (WRN) migrates Holliday junctions and co-localizes with RPA upon replication arrest. EMBO Rep. 2000;1:80–84.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kusumoto R, Muftuoglu M, Bohr VA. The role of WRN in DNA repair is affected by post-translational modifications. Mech Ageing Dev. 2007;128:50–57.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Cheng WH, von Kobbe C, Opresko PL, Fields KM, Ren J, Kufe D, et al. Werner syndrome protein phosphorylation by Abl tyrosine kinase regulates its activity and distribution. Mol Cell Biol. 2003;23:6385–95.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ammazzalorso F, Pirzio LM, Bignami M, Franchitto A, Pichierri P. ATR and ATM differently regulate WRN to prevent DSBs at stalled replication forks and promote replication fork recovery. EMBO J. 2010;29:3156–69.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Palermo V, Rinalducci S, Sanchez M, Grillini F, Sommers JA, Brosh RM Jr., et al. CDK1 phosphorylates WRN at collapsed replication forks. Nat Commun. 2016;7:12880.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Pichierri P, Rosselli F, Franchitto A. Werner’s syndrome protein is phosphorylated in an ATR/ATM-dependent manner following replication arrest and DNA damage induced during the S phase of the cell cycle. Oncogene. 2003;22:1491–1500.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Yannone SM, Roy S, Chan DW, Murphy MB, Huang S, Campisi J, et al. Werner syndrome protein is regulated and phosphorylated by DNA-dependent protein kinase. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:38242–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Li K, Casta A, Wang R, Lozada E, Fan W, Kane S, et al. Regulation of WRN protein cellular localization and enzymatic activities by SIRT1-mediated deacetylation. J Biol Chem. 2008;283:7590–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Muftuoglu M, Kusumoto R, Speina E, Beck G, Cheng WH, Bohr VA. Acetylation regulates WRN catalytic activities and affects base excision DNA repair. PLoS ONE 2008;3:e1918.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Blander G, Zalle N, Daniely Y, Taplick J, Gray MD, Oren M. DNA damage-induced translocation of the Werner helicase is regulated by acetylation. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:50934–40.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kawabe Y, Seki M, Seki T, Wang WS, Imamura O, Furuichi Y, et al. Covalent modification of the Werner’s syndrome gene product with the ubiquitin-related protein, SUMO-1. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:20963–6.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Su F, Bhattacharya S, Abdisalaam S, Mukherjee S, Yajima H, Yang Y, et al. Replication stress induced site-specific phosphorylation targets WRN to the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway. Oncotarget. 2016;7:46–65.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Li K, Wang R, Lozada E, Fan W, Orren DK, Luo J. Acetylation of WRN protein regulates its stability by inhibiting ubiquitination. PLoS ONE 2010;5:e10341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Shamanna RA, Lu H, Croteau DL, Arora A, Agarwal D, Ball G, et al. Camptothecin targets WRN protein: mechanism and relevance in clinical breast cancer. Oncotarget. 2016;7:13269–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Momand J, Zambetti GP, Olson DC, George D, Levine AJ. The mdm-2 oncogene product forms a complex with the p53 protein and inhibits p53-mediated transactivation. Cell. 1992;69:1237–45.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Honda R, Tanaka H, Yasuda H. Oncoprotein MDM2 is a ubiquitin ligase E3 for tumor suppressor p53. FEBS Lett. 1997;420:25–27.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Wu X, Bayle JH, Olson D, Levine AJ. The p53-mdm-2 autoregulatory feedback loop. Genes & Dev. 1993;7:1126–32.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Tollini LA, Jin A, Park J, Zhang Y. Regulation of p53 by Mdm2 E3 ligase function is dispensable in embryogenesis and development, but essential in response to DNA damage. Cancer Cell 2014;26:235–47.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Itahana K, Mao H, Jin A, Itahana Y, Clegg HV, Lindstrom MS, et al. Targeted inactivation of Mdm2 RING finger E3 ubiquitin ligase activity in the mouse reveals mechanistic insights into p53 regulation. Cancer Cell 2007;12:355–66.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Wade M, Li YC, Wahl GM. MDM2, MDMX and p53 in oncogenesis and cancer therapy. Nat Rev Cancer. 2013;13:83–96.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Toledo F, Wahl GM. Regulating the p53 pathway: in vitro hypotheses, in vivo veritas. Nat Rev Cancer. 2006;6:909–23.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Vousden KH, Lu X. Live or let die: the cell’s response to p53. Nat Rev Cancer. 2002;2:594–604.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Shieh SY, Ikeda M, Taya Y, Prives C. DNA damage-induced phosphorylation of p53 alleviates inhibition by MDM2. Cell 1997;91:325–34.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Mikawa T, Maruyama T, Okamoto K, Nakagama H, Lleonart ME, Tsusaka T, et al. Senescence-inducing stress promotes proteolysis of phosphoglycerate mutase via ubiquitin ligase Mdm2. J Cell Biol. 2014;204:729–45.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Brenkman AB, de Keizer PL, van den Broek NJ, Jochemsen AG, Burgering BM. Mdm2 induces mono-ubiquitination of FOXO4. PLoS ONE 2008;3:e2819.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Uchida C, Miwa S, Kitagawa K, Hattori T, Isobe T, Otani S, et al. Enhanced Mdm2 activity inhibits pRB function via ubiquitin-dependent degradation. EMBO J. 2005;24:160–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Vassilev LT, Vu BT, Graves B, Carvajal D, Podlaski F, Filipovic Z, et al. In vivo activation of the p53 pathway by small-molecule antagonists of MDM2. Science. 2004;303:844–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Rufini A, Tucci P, Celardo I, Melino G. Senescence and aging: the critical roles of p53. Oncogene. 2013;32:5129–43.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Zuckerman V, Wolyniec K, Sionov RV, Haupt S, Haupt Y. Tumour suppression byp53: the importance of apoptosis and cellular senescence. J Pathol. 2009;219:3–15.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Wu ZH, Shi Y, Tibbetts RS, Miyamoto S. Molecular linkage between the kinase ATM and NF-kappaB signaling in response to genotoxic stimuli. Science. 2006;311:1141–6.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Kang C, Xu Q, Martin TD, Li MZ, Demaria M, Aron L, et al. The DNA damage response induces inflammation and senescence by inhibiting autophagy of GATA4. Science. 2015;349:aaa5612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. Jiadong Wang for generously providing Lenti-CRISPR-V2 plasmid. HCT116 p53−/− cell is a kind gift from Dr. Xiaojuan Du.

Author contributions

BL and JL designed research; BL, JY, XY, LL, XL, ZZ and JZ performed research; BL, ZW, HQ, W-GZ and JL analyzed data; and BL, WG, and JL wrote the paper.

Funding

This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (81270427, 81471405, 81671389, 81720108027 and 81321003) and from National Research Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China China (973 Program, 2013CB530801).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jianyuan Luo.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, B., Yi, J., Yang, X. et al. MDM2-mediated degradation of WRN promotes cellular senescence in a p53-independent manner. Oncogene 38, 2501–2515 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41388-018-0605-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41388-018-0605-5

Further reading

Search

Quick links