Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

RANBP9 affects cancer cells response to genotoxic stress and its overexpression is associated with worse response to platinum in NSCLC patients

Abstract

Although limited by severe side effects and development of resistance, platinum-based therapies still represent the most common first-line treatment for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, a crucial need in the clinical management of NSCLC is represented by the identification of cases sensitive to DNA damage response (DDR)-targeting drugs, such as cisplatin or PARP inhibitors. Here, we provide a molecular rationale for the stratification of NSCLC patients potentially benefitting from platinum compounds based on the expression levels of RANBP9, a recently identified player of the cellular DDR. RANBP9 was found overexpressed by immunohistochemistry (IHC) in NSCLC compared to normal adjacent tissues (NATs) (n = 147). Moreover, a retrospective analysis of 132 platinum-treated patients from the multi-centric TAILOR trial showed that RANBP9 overexpression levels are associated with clinical response to platinum compounds [Progression Free Survival Hazard Ratio (RANBP9 high vs low) 1.73, 95% CI 1.15–2.59, p = 0.0084; Overall Survival HR (RANBP9 high vs low) 1.99, 95% CI 1.27–3.11, p = 0.003]. Accordingly, RANBP9 KO cells showed higher sensitivity to cisplatin in comparison with WT controls both in vitro and in vivo models. NSCLC RANBP9 KO cells were also more sensitive than control cells to the PARP inhibitor olaparib alone and in combination with cisplatin, due to defective ATM-dependent and hyper-activated PARP-dependent DDR. The current investigation paves the way to prospective studies to assess the clinical value of RANBP9 protein levels as prognostic and predictive biomarker of response to DDR-targeting drugs, leading to the development of new tools for the management of NSCLC patients.

This is a preview of subscription content

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

$32.00

All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

References

  1. Kris MG, Gaspar LE, Chaft JE, Kennedy EB, Azzoli CG, Ellis PM et al. Adjuvant systemic therapy and adjuvant radiation therapy for stage I to IIIA completely resected non-small-cell lung cancers: American Society of Clinical Oncology/Cancer Care Ontario Clinical Practice Guideline Update. J Clin Oncol. 2017: JCO2017724401.

  2. Pisters KM, Evans WK, Azzoli CG, Kris MG, Smith CA, Desch CE, et al. Cancer Care Ontario and American Society of Clinical Oncology adjuvant chemotherapy and adjuvant radiation therapy for stages I-IIIA resectable non small-cell lung cancer guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:5506–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chan BA, Hughes BG. Targeted therapy for non-small cell lung cancer: current standards and the promise of the future. Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2015;4:36–54.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Xiong Y, Huang BY, Yin JY. Pharmacogenomics of platinum-based chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer: focusing on DNA repair systems. Med Oncol. 2017;34:48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Shukuya T, Carbone DP. Predictive markers for the efficacy of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies in lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2016;11:976–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kuribayashi K, Funaguchi N, Nakano T. Chemotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer with a focus on squamous cell carcinoma. J Cancer Res Ther. 2016;12:528–34.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Swift LH, Golsteyn RM. Genotoxic anti-cancer agents and their relationship to DNA damage, mitosis, and checkpoint adaptation in proliferating cancer cells. Int J Mol Sci. 2014;15:3403–31.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Socinski MA, Jotte RM, Cappuzzo F, Orlandi F, Stroyakovskiy D, Nogami N, et al. Atezolizumab for first-line treatment of metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC. N Engl J Med. 2018;378:2288–301.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Socinski MA, Obasaju C, Gandara D, Hirsch FR, Bonomi P, Bunn PA Jr, et al. Current and emergent therapy options for advanced squamous cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2018;13:165–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kelland L. The resurgence of platinum-based cancer chemotherapy. Nat Rev Cancer. 2007;7:573–84.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Woods D, Turchi JJ. Chemotherapy induced DNA damage response: convergence of drugs and pathways. Cancer Biol Ther. 2013;14:379–89.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Arafa HM, Abdel-Hamid MA, El-Khouly AA, Elmazar MM, Osman AM. Enhancement by dexamethasone of the therapeutic benefits of cisplatin via regulation of tumor angiogenesis and cell cycle kinetics in a murine tumor paradigm. Toxicology. 2006;222:103–13.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Brouwers EE, Huitema AD, Beijnen JH, Schellens JH. Long-term platinum retention after treatment with cisplatin and oxaliplatin. BMC Clin Pharmacol. 2008;8:7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Chaudhary UB, Haldas JR. Long-term complications of chemotherapy for germ cell tumours. Drugs. 2003;63:1565–77.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Drottar M, Liberman MC, Ratan RR, Roberson DW. The histone deacetylase inhibitor sodium butyrate protects against cisplatin-induced hearing loss in guinea pigs. Laryngoscope. 2006;116:292–6.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hatzopoulos S, Di Stefano M, Albertin A, Martini A. Evaluation of cisplatin ototoxicity in a rat animal model. Ann NY Acad Sci. 1999;884:211–25.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lee SM, Falzon M, Blackhall F, Spicer J, Nicolson M, Chaudhuri A, et al. Randomized prospective biomarker trial of ERCC1 for comparing platinum and nonplatinum therapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: ERCC1 Trial (ET). J Clin Oncol. 2017;35:402–11.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Salemi LM, Maitland MER, McTavish CJ, Schild-Poulter C. Cell signalling pathway regulation by RanBPM: molecular insights and desease implications. Open Biol. 2017;7:170081.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Suresh B, Ramakrishna S, Baek KH. Diverse roles of the scaffolding protein RanBPM. Drug Discov Today. 2012;17:379–87.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Palmieri D, Scarpa M, Tessari A, Uka R, Amari F, Lee C, et al. Ran Binding Protein 9 (RanBP9) is a novel mediator of cellular DNA damage response in lung cancer cells. Oncotarget. 2016;7:18371–83.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Yard BD, Adams DJ, Chie EK, Tamayo P, Battaglia JS, Gopal P, et al. A genetic basis for the variation in the vulnerability of cancer to DNA damage. Nat Commun. 2016;7:11428.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Garassino MC, Martelli O, Broggini M, Farina G, Veronese S, Rulli E, et al. Erlotinib versus docetaxel as second-line treatment of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer and wild-type EGFR tumours (TAILOR): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14:981–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kellar A, Egan C, Morris D. Preclinical Murine Models for Lung Cancer: Clinical Trial Applications. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:621324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Horibe S, Matsuda A, Tanahashi T, Inoue J, Kawauchi S, Mizuno S. et al. Cisplatin resistance in human lung cancer cells is linked with dysregulation of cell cycle associated proteins. Life Sci. 2015;124:31–40.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Sears CR, Cooney SA, Chin-Sinex H, Mendonca MS, Turchi JJ. DNA damage response (DDR) pathway engagement in cisplatinradiosensitization of non-small cell lung cancer. DNA Repair. 2016;40:35–46.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Ceccaldi R, Liu JC, Amunugama R, Hajdu I, Primack B, Petalcorin MI. et al. Homologous-recombination-deficient tumours aredependent on Poltheta-mediated repair. Nature. 2015;518:258–62.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Konstantinopoulos PA, Ceccaldi R, Shapiro GI, D’Andrea AD. Homologous recombination deficiency: exploiting the fundamental vulnerability of ovarian cancer. Cancer Discov. 2015;5:1137–54.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Eustermann S, Wu WF, Langelier MF, Yang JC, Easton LE, Riccio AA. et al. Structural basis of detection and signaling of DNA single-strand breaks by human PARP-1. Mol Cell. 2015;60:742–54.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Satoh MS, Lindahl T. Role of poly (ADP-ribose) formation in DNA repair. Nature. 1992;356:356–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Bryant HE, Schultz N, Thomas HD, Parker KM, Flower D, Lopez E. et al. Specific killing of BRCA2-deficient tumours with inhibitorsof poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase. Nature. 2005;434:913–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Murai J, Huang SY, Das BB, Renaud A, Zhang Y, Doroshow JH. et al. Trapping of PARP1 and PARP2 by clinical PARP inhibitors. Cancer Res. 2012;72:5588–99.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Atabakhsh E, Bryce DM, Lefebvre KJ, Schild-Poulter C. RanBPM has proapoptotic activities that regulate cell death pathways inresponse to DNA damage. Mol Cancer Res.2009;7:1962–72.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Atabakhsh E, Schild-Poulter C. RanBPM is an inhibitor of ERK signaling. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e47803.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Shao S, Sun PH, Satherley LK, Gao X, Ji KE, Feng YI, et al. Reduced RanBPM expression is associated with distant metastasis in gastric cancer and chemoresistance. Anticancer Res. 2016;36:1295–303.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Suresh B, Ramakrishna S, Kim YS, Kim SM, Kim MS, Baek KH. Stability and function of mammalian lethal giant larvae-1 oncoprotein are regulated by the scaffolding protein RanBPM. J Biol Chem. 2010;285:35340–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Zhu LL, Wang CH, Yang HP, Shu WH. Expression of cartilage antitumor component RanBP9 in osteosarcoma. J Biol Regul Homeost Agents. 2016;30:103–10.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Zhao Z, Cheng S, Zabkiewicz C, Chen J, Zhang L, Ye L, et al. Reduced expression of RanBPM is associated with poorer survival from lung cancer and increased proliferation and invasion of lung cancer cells in vitro. Anticancer Res. 2017;37:4389–97.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Hoernes TP, Huttenhofer A, Erlacher MD. mRNA modifications: dynamic regulators of gene expression? RNA Biol. 2016;13:760–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Liu Y, Beyer A, Aebersold R. On the dependency of cellular protein levels on mRNA abundance. Cell. 2016;165:535–50.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Vogel C, Marcotte EM. Insights into the regulation of protein abundance from proteomic and transcriptomic analyses. Nat Rev Genet. 2012;13:227–32.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Ghosal G, Chen J. DNA damage tolerance: a double-edged sword guarding the genome. Transl Cancer Res. 2013;2:107–29.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Pawlowska E, Blasiak J. DNA repair--a double-edged sword in the genomic stability of cancer cells--the case of chronic myeloid leukemia. Int J Mol Sci. 2015;16:27535–49.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Postel-Vinay S, Vanhecke E, Olaussen KA, Lord CJ, Ashworth A, Soria JC. The potential of exploiting DNA-repair defects for optimizing lung cancer treatment. Nature reviews. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2012;9:144–55.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Jin HO, Hong SE, Woo SH, Lee JH, Choe TB, Kim EK, et al. Silencing of Twist1 sensitizes NSCLC cells to cisplatin via AMPK-activated mTOR inhibition. Cell Death Dis. 2012;3:e319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Leung AWY, Veinotte CJ, Melong N, Oh MH, Chen K, Enfield KSS, et al. In vivo validation of PAPSS1 (3’-phosphoadenosine 5’-phosphosulfate synthase 1) as a cisplatin-sensitizing therapeutic target. Clin Cancer Res. 2017;23:6555–66.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Bonanno L. Predictive models for customizing chemotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2013;2:160–71.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Quinn JE, Kennedy RD, Mullan PB, Gilmore PM, Carty M, Johnston PG, et al. BRCA1 functions as a differential modulator of chemotherapy-induced apoptosis. Cancer Res. 2003;63:6221–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Rosell R, Skrzypski M, Jassem E, Taron M, Bartolucci R, Sanchez JJ, et al. BRCA1: a novel prognostic factor in resected non-small-cell lung cancer. PLoS ONE. 2007;2:e1129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Farmer H, McCabe N, Lord CJ, Tutt AN, Johnson DA, Richardson TB, et al. Targeting the DNA repair defect in BRCA mutant cells as a therapeutic strategy. Nature. 2005;434:917–21.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Turner N, Tutt A, Ashworth A. Hallmarks of ‘BRCAness’ in sporadic cancers. Nat Rev Cancer. 2004;4:814–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Lord CJ, Ashworth A. BRCAness revisited. Nat Rev Cancer. 2016;16:110–20.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Ballestrero A, Bedognetti D, Ferraioli D, Franceschelli P, Labidi-Galy SI, Leo E, et al. Report on the first SLFN11 monothematic workshop: from function to role as a biomarker in cancer. J Transl Med. 2017;15:199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Chen MK, Hung MC. Regulation of therapeutic resistance in cancers by receptor tyrosine kinases. Am J Cancer Res. 2016;6:827–42.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Reinhold WC, Thomas A, Pommier Y. DNA-targeted precision medicine; have we been caught sleeping? Trends Cancer. 2017;3:2–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Authors are thankful to Dr. R. Shakya and the Target Validation Shared Resource, the Campus Microscopy & Imaging Facility, the Analytical Cytometry Shared Resource, the Comparative Pathology and Mouse Phenotyping Shared Resource, the Genetically Engineered Mouse Modeling Core, and N. Single and L. Monovich of the Biospecimen Services Shared Resource of the Ohio State University-Comprehensive Cancer Center. A.T. and M.P. are recipients of a Pelotonia Fellowship for Cancer Research. This work was supported by start-up funds to V.C. from the College of Medicine, Office of Research, and Comprehensive Cancer Center of the Ohio State University.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vincenzo Coppola.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tessari, A., Parbhoo, K., Pawlikowski, M. et al. RANBP9 affects cancer cells response to genotoxic stress and its overexpression is associated with worse response to platinum in NSCLC patients. Oncogene 37, 6463–6476 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41388-018-0424-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41388-018-0424-8

Further reading

Search

Quick links