Social subordination induced by early life adversity rewires inhibitory control of the prefrontal cortex via enhanced Npy1r signaling


Social hierarchies are present in most mammalian species. In nature, hierarchies offer a tradeoff between reduction of in-group fighting between males, at the expense of an asymmetric sharing of resources. Early life experiences and stress are known to influence the rank an individual attains in adulthood, but the associated cellular and synaptic alterations are poorly understood. Using a maternal separation protocol, we show that care-deprived mice display a long-lasting submissive phenotype, increased social recognition, and enhanced explorative behavior. These alterations are consistent with an adaptation that favors exploration rather than confrontation within a group setting. At the neuronal level, these animals display dendritic atrophy and enhanced inhibitory synaptic inputs in medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) neurons. To determine what could underlie this synaptic modification, we first assessed global gene expression changes via RNAseq, and next focused on a smaller subset of putatively altered synaptic receptors that could explain the changes in synaptic inhibition. Using different cohorts of maternally deprived mice, we validated a significant increase in the expression of Npy1r, a receptor known to play a role in maternal care, anxiety, foraging, and regulation of group behavior. Using electrophysiological recordings in adult mice while blocking NPY1R signaling, we determined that this receptor plays a key role in enhancing GABAergic currents in mice that experience maternal deprivation. Taken together, our work highlights the potential of regulating NPY1R in social anxiety disorders and the alterations induced in brain circuitry as a consequence of early life stress and adversity.


Individuals from gregarious species experience social stressors emanating from isolation, agonistic encounters, overcrowding, or from the relative rank in their social hierarchy [1,2,3,4]. As a physiological insult, social stressors produce salient responses along the animals’ lifespan [5], such that in primates, stress linked to the position an individual occupies within its hierarchy is the single best predictor of health [2]. In the mammalian brain, the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) has been implicated in the control of social hierarchy behaviors [6, 7] and is a central target for neuroendocrine signals [8, 9]. Persistent activation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis produces a remodeling in the mPFC that impacts decision-making [10]. This brain area is also critical in processing social and moral reasoning in humans [7, 11] and, in rodents, damaging the mPFC lowers social dominance and induces deficits in recognizing social rank [12, 13]. Recent studies have demonstrated that manipulation of synaptic strength in this area alone is sufficient to provide direct and bidirectional control over social rank [6, 14]. Together, these data indicate that mPFC circuitry is reciprocally involved in biological aspects pertaining to the control of social dominance and in the integration of stress response.

In mice, early life stress (ELS) induced by maternal separation leads to a lower rank in adulthood [15, 16]. However, the physiological alterations behind these changes in behavior have not been fully explored. Here, using behavior tests, RNAseq gene expression analysis, neuronal morphology studies, and electrophysiology recordings, we uncover a striking remodeling in prefrontal synaptic network function that occurs as a consequence of adverse rearing conditions induced by maternal separation. At the behavioral level, ELS male mice display social subordination, enhanced social recognition, and increased explorative behavior. From a large pool of gene expression changes induced in the mPFC by ELS, we pinpoint Npy1r as an element whose expression level is strongly and inversely correlated with social dominance. We also find evidence that NPY1R is involved in mediating alterations in synaptic inhibitory currents in the mPFC of ELS mice. More broadly, the ethological significance of these findings suggests that, in mice, adverse or disadvantageous rearing produces neuronal and gene expression changes that favor social behavioral adaptations that drive individuals toward egress (exploration) rather than fighting within the social hierarchy (exploitation).

Materials and methods

Detailed methods for behavioral tests, electrophysiology recordings, neuronal labeling with AAV, and confocal imaging, preparation of RNA and DNA samples, RNAseq, methylation assays, qRT-PCR, immunofluorescence, and tissue dissection methodologies were performed as previously described [17,18,19] and are provided as Supplementary materials and methods.


Mouse cages were maintained at a constant temperature (22 °C) and humidity (60%), under a 12 h light/dark cycle (lights on from 7 a.m. to 7 p.m.) in an individual cage ventilation system. After weaning, experimental animals were raised in groups of four mice per cage and allowed access to water and food ad libitum. Only male animals were used in this study. Tests were conducted from 9 am to 5 pm. Maintenance and handling of animals was performed according to the Animals Use and Care Guidelines issued by FELASA. All experiments with mice were carried out according to the protocols approved by ORBEA (Institutional Animal Welfare Body of the University of Coimbra), DGAV (Portuguese Regulatory Agency), and European Directives on Animal Welfare. All behavioral tests and quantifications were performed by trained experimentalists blinded to animal treatment. Behavioral tests were performed in age-matched 3–6-month-old animals.

ELS induced by maternal separation and maternal unpredictable stress

The maternal separation and maternal unpredictable stress protocol was adapted from [20]. Briefly, after mating, pregnant females were individually housed and daily inspected for delivery (assigned as day 0). During the first 2 postnatal weeks, from postnatal day (PND) 2 to PND 14, daily maternal separation of 3 h was performed during the dark cycle by placing mothers and pups in two separate clean cages. Dams were allowed access to water and food ad libitum, and pups remained together during the separation period. Cages were placed side by side to allow visual and olfactory contact. Timing of separation and maternal stress was performed on a pseudo-random schedule. To perform unpredictable maternal stress, we used either a 20-min restraint in a plexiglas tube or of a 5-min forced swim in cold water (18 °C). Control litters were left undisturbed except for cage maintenance. All pups were weighted on PND 2, 7, 14, and 21. After weaning (PND 21), males from the same treatment group were reared in social groups of four mice per cage.

Statistical analysis

Data are represented as mean values ± s.e.m. or as frequency distribution plots (as indicated in figure legend). Statistical analysis was performed using unpaired two-tailed Student’s t test, two-tailed Mann–Whitney test, one-way, or two-way ANOVA analysis followed by Bonferroni, Sidak’s or FDR post-hoc test (indicated where applicable), or one-sample Chi-square test. Sample normality was tested using D’Agostino–Pearson normality test. Analysis was performed using Prism (Graphpad) or MATLAB (Mathworks). Statistical significance was defined as ***p < 0.001, **p < 0.01, *p < 0.05.


Early life adversity induces social subordination and increased explorative behavior

To address the consequences of ELS, we subjected C57BL/6 pups to unpredictable maternal separation and maternal stress between PND 2 and PND 14 (Fig. 1a). ELS mice initially displayed lower body weight during the period of separation but recovered fully to similar levels as control animals (CTR) by 2 months of age (Fig. 1b). In our battery of behavioral tests (Fig. 1c–h) ELS male mice did not display gross motor behavior deficits (Fig. 1g). However, as previously reported [21], we found alterations in the forced swimming test, seen as a decrease in the latency to stop swimming (CTR: 73.32 ± 3.666 s, n = 25; ELS: 59.46 ± 2.588 s, n = 35; p = 0.0023) (Fig. 1c), however, there were no significant changes between groups in terms of time spent immobile (CTR: 189.0 ± 6.097 s, n = 25; ELS: 182.2 ± 6.478 s, n = 35; p > 0.05) (Fig. 1d). We observed low anxiety levels in ELS animals, as the latency to enter the open arms in the elevated plus maze was reduced (CTR: 206 ± 34.21 s, n = 24; ELS: 127.6 ± 20.7 s, n = 35; p = 0.0421) (Fig. 1f), and total time spent in the center of the open field was increased (two-way ANOVA CTR × ELS; F(1, 40) = 5.719; p = 0.0216) (Fig. 1h). We then tested a separate cohort of animals in an exploration test designed to assess the latency to bite a food pellet placed in the center of a novel open field and again observed a risk-taking behavior by ELS animals (CTR: 284.1 ± 13.52 s, n = 7; ELS: 207.9 ± 26.89 s, n = 7; p = 0.0256) (Supplementary Fig. 1A). This difference was no longer present when the test was performed in a clean home cage (Supplementary Fig. 1B). Together, these results suggest that ELS induced an increase in explorative risk-taking behavior.

Fig. 1: ELS mice show enhanced risk-taking and depressive-like behaviors.

a Experimental design to induce and assess the effects of ELS on adult male mice (2–3 months old). b When compared with CTR, the weight of ELS animals is lower during the period of maternal separation but normalizes when animals reach P60. c, d ELS induces a decrease in latency to stop swimming in the forced swimming test, but no change in total time spent immobile. e, f Alterations in anxiety-like behaviors were assessed in the elevated plus maze including (d) percentage of time spent in the open arms and (e) latency to enter an open arm. ELS mice display normal motor but increased exploratory behavior in the open field, when measuring (g) total distance traveled and (h) time spent in the center portion of the arena, respectively. Statistical comparisons were performed using unpaired two-tailed t-test (for bf) and two-way repeated measures ANOVA (for g, h); CTR n = 18–25, ELS n = 24–35. Statistical significance was set as *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01. Data are presented as means ± SEM.

We then assessed if maternal separation would impair the ability of animals to form stable social hierarchies (Fig. 2a–c). We performed tube test trials between CTR cage-mates (Fig. 2a, b) or between ELS cage-mates (Fig. 2c) and found that ELS cage-mates still formed linear and transitive hierarchies that remained stable for several days (Fig. 2a–c). Next, we examined whether ELS would affect the dominance rank of animals when these animals were pitted against CTR individuals (Fig. 2d–g). To test this, we designed a round-robin type tournament (Fig. 2d) so that both CTR and ELS mice only encountered unfamiliar CTR and ELS mice from another cage. In this “Round-Robin Tube Test” (RRTT), we observed a striking phenotype of social subordination in ELS mice (two-way ANOVACTR × ELS; F(1,14) = 31,31; p < 0.0001) (Fig. 2e, f). For each cohort, eight repetitions of a full round-robin tournament were performed to assess the cumulative victories of each animal against every other individual (Fig. 2e). Along these trials, dominance-subordinate relationships with noncage-mate animals did not change over the course of several days (two-way ANOVAdifferent round-robins; F(7,98) = 0; p > 0.9999) (Fig. 2f, g), indicating that a stable meta-hierarchy is achievable even when animals are not housed together. On average, we found that ELS mice lost ~75% of encounters when considering only CTR–ELS encounters (Fig. 2f). At a more granular level, we found that the relationship between CTR and ELS dyads remained surprisingly stable, with 48% of mice remaining undefeated against defined adversaries (Fig. 2g—dark gray and dark red) and only 5% of dyads displaying alternating win–loss encounters (Fig. 2g—white squares). Together, these results strongly suggest ELS produces a stable pattern of social subordination in adult life. Moreover, we repeated this assay and replicated the social subordination phenotype in three other independent cohorts.

Fig. 2: Social subordinate behavior and enhanced social recognition in ELS mice.

a Example of an intra-cage hierarchy structure and social ranks for a single cage with four adult CTR cage-mates tested daily for 6 days in a tube test. Rank stability is observed in both (b) CTR and (c) ELS cages, with rare rank transitions; CTR n = 5 cages, ELS n = 6 cages. d Schematic representation of encounters performed by each animal in a round-robin test, where each animal only competes with mice from other cages in a total of 12 dyadic encounters per trial. e Meta-hierarchy between unfamiliar CTR and ELS adult male mice is represented by the cumulative performance of each animal across each encounter, with error bar representing deviation in encounter outcome across trials; CTR n = 8, ELS n = 8, across 8 RRTT trials. f When compared across time, social subordination in ELS mice presents a stable overall percentage of win–loss encounters when assessing CTR–ELS dyadic encounters; CTR n = 8, ELS n = 8, across 8 RRTT trials. g Heatmap analysis of dyadic encounters reveals a predictable social fingerprint pattern of win–loss outcomes in CTR and ELS animals. h In both ELS cages and CTR cages, the inter-cage meta-hierarchy assessed in the round-robin (RR) is a strong predictor of intra-cage hierarchy. i ELS mice display social subordination in a food competition test when assessing time spent in control of a food pellet after 21 h of food deprivation; CTR n = 8, ELS n = 8. j Total duration for conflict resolution in the tube test was determined as encounter duration in encounters between the three possible dyads: CTR vs CTR (gray), CTR vs ELS (dark red), and ELS vs ELS (red). ELS-ELS dyadic encounters are significantly faster than encounters between ELS–CTR mice or CTR–CTR; CTR n = 8 mice, ELS n = 8 mice; valid dyadic encounters CTR–CTR n = 127, ELS-ELS n = 126, CTR–ELS n = 506. k Encounter duration is independent of the trial outcome in ELS–CTR dyads, as encounter duration is similar when CTR win (CTRW–ELSL: brown) or lose (CTRL–ELSW: yellow); CTR n = 8 mice, ELS n = 8 mice; valid dyadic encounters CTRW–ELSL n = 392, CTRL–ELSW n = 113. In a three-chamber test for social behavior, ELS mice display (l) normal sociability and (m) an increase recognition of social novelty; S1—Stranger 1, E—Empty chamber, S2—Stranger 2; CTR n = 20, ELS n = 20. Statistical comparisons were performed using two-way repeated measures ANOVA (for f), Spearman correlation (for h), unpaired two-tailed t-test (for i, l, m), Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s multiple comparisons test (for j), Mann–Whitney test (for k). Statistical significance was set as *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001. Data are presented as means ± SEM.

Since our animals were naïve to the performance of their cage-mates in the tube test, we also asked if the meta-hierarchy could predict intra-cage social rank. To assess this, we ran cage-mates in tube test encounters, after the completion of the RRTT, and compared their intra-cage hierarchy to the rank predicted from the results of the meta-hierarchy. We found a strong and significant correlation between prediction and experimental data, again suggesting that a meta-hierarchy is a robust procedure to assess social dominance between larger groups of animals (rs = 0.8111, n = 44, p < 0.001) (Fig. 2h).

Finally, to validate the tube test data using a different paradigm, we performed a food competition test between CTR–ELS dyads after mild (21 h) food deprivation. We designed the test so that the animals where fully acclimatized to the test and that a small food pellet could only be held and eaten by one mouse at a time. In this assay, CTR mice spent more time controlling the food pellet when compared with ELS mice (CTR: 60.33 ± 6.067 s, n = 14; ELS: 41.78 ± 6.426 s, n = 14; p = 0.0444) (Fig. 2i), further suggesting submissiveness in social competitions of mice that undergone ELS.

Faster resolution of social conflicts in animals that experienced ELS

We hypothesized that animals with greater rank difference would resolve the tube test conflict more rapidly [6]. However, while we found that CTR–ELS dyadic encounters did resolve faster than CTR–CTR encounters, our data showed that ELS-ELS encounters displayed the lowest latencies of the three possible encounter types as there was a statistically significant difference between the latencies depending on dyadic combinations (Kruskal–Wallis H(2) = 47.54, p < 0.0001) with a mean rank of 470 s for CTR × CTR dyads, 382.3 s for CTR × ELS dyads and 280.2 s for ELS × ELS dyads (Fig. 2j). Moreover, we also found that trial duration in CTR–ELS encounters was largely independent of trial outcome (Mann–Whitney U = 20380; CTRwins × ELSloses: median = 53.44 s, n = 393; CTRloses × ELSwins: median = 43.9 s, n = 113; p = 0.1829) (Fig. 2k). We speculated that ELS-ELS encounters resolved fastest due to an enhanced aptitude of these animals to process social cues, which could give them an adaptive advantage in social competitions due to their deficient rearing by allowing a rapid resolution of social conflicts. To test this, we next performed a three-chamber social test for social exploration (Fig. 2l, m). We found no alteration in sociability as measured by the percentage of time CTR and ELS mice spent interacting with a stranger animal versus an empty cage (Fig. 2l), since both groups presented equal preference to interact with a stranger animal (Preference for Social1, CTR: 59 ± 2.992%, n = 20; ELS: 57.72 ± 2.31%; p = 0.7367). However, in a second part of the trial, ELS mice spent significantly more time interacting with a novel mouse (Preference for Social2, CTR: 54.95 ± 3.787%, n = 20; ELS: 67.54 ± 3.413%; p = 0.0182) (Fig. 2m). Next, to perform a more challenging task we used a modified version of the three-chamber test that started with two social partners (of the same strain as the test subjects) on each side of the arena (Supplementary Fig. 2A, B). In this test, we observed that CTR mice did not show significant preference for the novel social partner S3 (CTR: S1–2 = 43.37 ± 4.782% vs S3 = 56.63 ± 4.782; n = 12; p = 0.0625), whereas ELS animals spent significantly more time with the novel partner (ELS: S1–2 = 40.83 ± 2.917% vs S3 = 59.17 ± 2.917; n = 16; p < 0.001) (Supplementary Fig. 2B). These data suggest ELS mice displayed an enhancement in social recognition or the perception of social cues, which may underlie the faster resolution of the tube test conflict.

Early life adversity induces enhanced inhibitory currents and dendritic atrophy in layer II/III neurons of the mPFC

To investigate if cellular alterations occur upon perturbed rearing conditions in the early postnatal period, we collected information on morphological and electrophysiological parameters from pyramidal neurons in the mPFC of adult mice. We chose to investigate the mPFC since this region is: (1) strongly targeted by the glucocorticoid system [8], (2) responsible for top-down control of other brain systems according to the animals’ internal state and intention [22], and (3) has been strongly implicated in the regulation of social hierarchy behaviors [6]. To investigate neuronal morphology changes in ELS mice, we performed peripheral injection of adeno-associated viral particles containing a GFP construct (AAV9.hSyn.GFP) via the tail vein to achieve a Golgi-like labeling of neurons in the whole mouse brain (see “Materials and methods” section and [17]). We then performed a reconstruction of neurons using confocal microscopy and assessed neuronal arborization and complexity via Sholl analysis. Interestingly, we found a specific defect in the arborization of layer II/III pyramidal neurons of ELS mice (two-way RM ANOVA10–100µm: CTR×ELS F(1,40) = 4.552; p = 0.0391) (Fig. 3a–c). However, no significant changes in spine density were present in these neurons (Supplementary Fig. 3). Moreover, we found no significant alterations in the dendritic arbors of neurons from layer V/VI (Fig. 3c), nor in the dendritic arborization of layer II/III neurons in frontal motor and somatosensorial cortex (Supplementary Fig. 4). These results suggest there is both a region- and layer-specific alteration, which is in-line with that observed following chronic stress, which results in localized dendric remodeling [10, 23]. Moreover, this demonstrates that early life rearing conditions strongly influence cortical network organization, specifically affecting the morphology of pyramidal neurons in layers II/III of the mPFC.

Fig. 3: Neuronal hypotrophy and enhanced inhibitory currents in layer II/III pyramidal cells from the mPFC of ELS mice.

a Peripheral injection of AAV9.hSyn.GFP via the tail vein leads to sparse but strong labeling of neurons in the mouse brain in a Golgi-like pattern. Insets show detail of neurons in layer II/III and V/VI of the mPFC. Scale bar (left) 1 mm, (right) 100 µm. b Schematic representation of acquired GFP-labeled mPFC neurons from layer II/III and neuronal complexity of pyramidal neurons in layers II/III in the mPFC is reduced in ELS mice, as assessed by Sholl analysis; CTR n = 25/3 neurons/mice, ELS n = 17/3 neurons/mice. c Schematic representation of acquired GFP-labeled mPFC neurons from layers V/VI; Sholl analysis of pyramidal neurons in this region do not show differences in complexity when comparing neurons from ELS with CTR mice; CTR n = 9/3 neurons/mice, ELS n = 15/3 neurons/mice. d Traces from sEPSC from CTR and ELS adult neurons. Scale bar, 20 pA, 100 ms. Unaltered sEPSC (e) amplitude and (f) frequency of events in neurons from ELS mice when compared with CTR; cumulative distribution plots for individual excitatory events are plotted and summary data are shown as insets; CTR n = 35 cells, ELS n = 21 cells. g Traces from sIPSC from CTR and ELS adult neurons. Scale bar, 20 pA, 200 ms. Pyramidal neurons in the mPFC display (h) an enhancement in inhibitory currents, but (i) no change in the frequency of inhibitory events; cumulative distribution plots for individual inhibitory events are plotted and summary data are shown as insets; CTR n = 36 cells, ELS n = 20 cells. Statistical comparisons were performed using two-way repeated measures ANOVA (for b and c) or two-tailed unpaired t-test. Significance was set at, *p < 0.05. Data in bar graphs are presented as means ± SEM.

We became interested in understanding if there were functional alterations in synaptic activity in the mPFC region. To this end, we performed whole-cell patch clamp in acute slices from adult (4-month old) CTR and ELS mice, using a modified slice recovery method [18]. We measured spontaneous network activity of both excitatory and inhibitory postsynaptic currents (sEPSCs and sIPSCs) in layer II/III pyramidal neurons (Fig. 3d–i). While we found no significant differences in sEPSC amplitude or frequency in adult animals (Fig. 3d–f), there was a significant increase in sIPSC amplitude in neurons from adult ELS mice (CTR: 9.607 ± 0.3894 pA, n = 36; ELS: 11.30 ± 0.6958, n = 20; p = 0.0253) (Fig. 3g–i). These results are in line with recent findings suggesting alterations in inhibitory neuron networks that occur as a consequence of ELS [24, 25].

In order to assess if these morphological and functional differences stemmed from persistent increases in corticosterone levels or if ELS mice were hyperreactive to stressful insults, we determined the concentration of corticosterone under basal conditions (between days of experimentation) and immediately following tube test encounters (Supplementary Fig. 5). While the tube test did significantly increase circulating corticosterone levels, there were no changes between CTR and ELS male mice before or immediately after running a tube test trial (Supplementary Fig. 5). This suggests that physiological and behavioral alterations are not necessarily propagated via a dysfunctional increased release of corticosterone in adult ELS mice. In addition, we found no evidence for significant alterations in the expression levels of corticosteroid receptors (see RNAseq data below and Supplementary material).

Global gene expression and functional analysis reveal Npy1r is overexpressed in the prefrontal cortex of ELS mice

Next, we aimed to assess global gene expression changes in the mPFC of ELS mice (Fig. 4a). We tested for overall DNA methylation changes, but found no significant alteration between groups (Fig. 4b). Using RNAseq (Fig. 4a and Supplementary Fig. 6), we detected a total of 13,865 transcripts, from which 180 displayed altered expression levels in the mPFC of ELS mice (Fig. 4c). From these, 78 transcripts were upregulated and 102 downregulated as illustrated in Fig. 4d and Supplementary Table 1. Consistently to what has been previously found for primate and rodent models of neonatal stress, we observed alterations in genes related to myelination [26, 27], such as Mag, Mog, Mal, Opalin, and Plp1, as well as alterations in targets proposed to be involved in chronic stress, such as Grm2 [28, 29]. Due to our behavioral and electrophysiological findings, we next decided to focus on the intersection between three gene ontology groups, “Biological Process—Behavior,” “Cellular component—Synapse,” and “Molecular Function—Receptor Activity” (Fig. 4e and Supplementary Tables 2–7), selecting for this analysis the following receptors for downstream validation: Chrna5, Drd1a, Drd5, Grm2, Hrh3, and Npy1r (Fig. 4e). Next, using a larger number of animals produced from different ELS cohorts, we validated which of these alterations were more saliently present in the stress model. From our target genes we found consistent increases in the expression of Grm2 and Npy1r in the mPFC of ELS mice (one-way ANOVA F(11,129) = 2.348; Post-hoc multiple comparisons FDR < 0.05) (Fig. 4f).

Fig. 4: Global alterations in gene expression in the mPFC of ELS mice.

a Schematic representation of the experimental procedure of mPFC RNAseq data collection. b Global DNA methylation levels are not significantly altered in the mPFC of adult male mice; CTR n = 7, ELS n = 9. c Normalized trace representation of fold change (log2 on y axis) and q value (log10 on x axis) for all transcripts detected in the RNAseq in CTR and ELS animals (total of 13,865 transcripts); significantly altered transcripts are represented in purple as q < 0.05 in FDR adjusted p values; CTR n = 3, ELS n = 3. d Circos plot display of upregulated transcripts in red (total of 78) and downregulated transcripts in blue (total of 102) in ELS mice compared with CTR; solid bars represent fold change (log2) and transparent portion of each bar represents transcript abundance in Fragments Per Kilobase Million (FPKM in log10). e Chord diagram highlighting genes belonging to the Gene Ontology categories, “Biological Process—Behavior,” “Cellular component—Synapse,” and “Molecular Function—Receptor Activity”; genes belonging to all three categories are connected by gray cords. f Validation by qRT-PCR of receptor channels involved in behavioral regulation; CTR n = 5–13, ELS n = 6–18. Statistical significance was set at, *p < 0.05 with FDR correction. Data in (b) and (f) are presented as means ± SEM.

Interestingly, NPY1R is heavily expressed in the frontal cortex and NPY is co-released with GABA by a subgroup of cortical interneurons [30]. While the physiological influence of NPY in cortical excitability has been complex to dissect, recent evidences strongly point to a role of this receptor in amplifying inhibitory inputs onto pyramidal neurons [31, 32]. Moreover, NPY1R is known to play a role in biological functions related to anxiety and feeding [33]. Interestingly, even in lower organisms, the Npy1r-orthologue can impact both social and foraging behaviors, with a naturally occurring point-mutation in this gene defining if a specific strain exhibits solitary or social feeding behavior [34].

Taking the above into consideration, we probed the relative influence of NPYergic tone on overall inhibition in pyramidal neurons in the mPFC of CTR and ELS mice. To assess this, we preincubated acute slices from 4-month-old animals with 1 µM BIBO 3304 trifluoroacetate (a selective NPY1 receptor antagonist) to discount the influence of NPY1R contribution toward inhibitory currents and recorded mIPSCs and sIPSCs. In this paradigm we recorded the GABAergic component as inward currents (see “Materials and methods” section) and observed a striking reduction in the amplitude of GABA-mediated currents in neurons from ELS mice both in spontaneous (CTR: 70.16 ± 7.097, n = 27; ELS: 51.2 ± 4.166, n = 19; p < 0.05) and miniature events (CTR: 54.74 ± 3.144, n = 27; ELS: 44.22 ± 2.847, n = 18; p < 0.05) when compared with CTR mice (Fig. 5). These data strongly suggest that not only is the inhibitory component increase in ELS mice being mediated by an upregulation in NPY1R, it suggests that this form of stress skewed mPFC micro-circuitry toward a greater NPYergic activation, since blocking NPY1 receptors reduced inhibitory currents significantly below control levels (Fig. 5j, k).

Fig. 5: Inhibiting NPY1R leads to a marked decrease in inhibitory currents in pyramidal neurons from adult ELS mice.

a Experimental setup (left) and representative traces (right) from inhibitory postsynaptic currents (mIPSC) from CTR and ELS neurons. To record chloride currents as salient inward currents, in this experiment the composition of the intracellular solution was altered to include high intracellular Cl concentration, while AMPA and NMDA receptors were blocked (see “Materials and methods” section). Scale bar, 50 pA, 100 ms. Reduced amplitude of mIPSC (b), but no changes to the frequency of events (c). Cumulative distribution plots for individual inhibitory events plotted as amplitude (d) and inter-event interval (e); CTR n = 27/5 cells/mice, ELS n = 19/4 cells/mice. Reduced amplitude of sIPSC (f), but no changes to the frequency of events (g). Cumulative distribution plots for individual inhibitory events plotted as amplitude (h) and inter-event interval (i); CTR n = 28/5 cells, ELS n = 18/4 cells. j Summary data from spontaneous inhibitory currents in ELS mice normalized to CTR, under basal conditions (see Fig. 4) and in the presence of the NPY1R antagonist. k Schematic representation of a potential mechanism where postsynaptic NPY1R leads to increased GABAA receptor membrane insertion. Statistical comparisons were performed using two-tailed unpaired t-test. Significance was set at, *p < 0.05. Data in bar graphs are presented as means ± SEM.


Several studies have demonstrated that during early childhood, brain regions such as the hippocampus, the amygdala, and the mPFC are particularly sensitive to the effects of chronic stress [5, 35]. In fact, maternal separation during this period has a remarkable influence in adult life [21, 36]. In this work we probed the molecular, cellular, and circuit alterations occurring in the mPFC of ELS animals and determined that traumatic maternal separation alters adult behavior and promotes the modulation of social strategies in male mice. We found no alterations in serum levels of corticosterone between control and ELS adult mice, before or after social hierarchy tests, suggesting that our ELS does not necessarily produce a maladaptive stress response or hyperreactivity in the HPA axis in adulthood.

We found a mild change in depressive-like behavior and observed a reduction in latency for the animals to become immobile in the forced swimming test, but no overall changes in total time spent in immobility. Since our results are sufficiently powered, our data suggest that the depressive-like behavior in male rodents may not be a principal consequence of maternal deprivation. This would be in line with a phenotypical manifestation of depression that is incompletely penetrant, prone to surface [21, 37] or not [38], depending on experimental variables or additional triggers [39].

From an ethological perspective, male mice experiencing hunger and improper rearing conditions during early life periods may be handicapped in future physical disputes over resources within the group setting. Thus, our findings of enhanced discrimination of social targets, social subordinance, and a faster resolution of social conflicts presented by ELS mice, in addition to their increase in foraging-like behaviors, point toward behavioral adaptations that could promote disengagement from competitions with higher ranked males. Therefore, we propose that ELS promotes an adaptation that induces foraging and reduced competition within the social group. As summarized by Wilson from the works of Christian [40] and Calhoun [41], “emigration and egress are tools of juveniles and subordinates” [42]. Furthermore, and as an extrapolation of our hypothesis, if male and female rodents provide nonequivalent contribution to overall group fitness under conditions of scarcity and stress, it would follow that behavioral adaptations also differ. Indeed, this is in line with several reports showing sexual dimorphic response as a consequence of early postnatal stress, whereby females show greater resilience to ELS [43, 44]. Future work should aim at understanding the sex-specific circuit level changes that promote different strategies in animal behavior.

At the genetic level, selective breeding programs have demonstrated that traits regulating social dominance may be rapidly enhanced in the span of only a few generations [45, 46], and genetic association studies have also suggested that traits influencing social dominance may be inherited [47]. However, the identification of individual genes and direct assessment of their impact on the cellular and synaptic network activity responsible for social dominance has not been widely scrutinized [47, 48]. Some examples include the serotonin transporter Slc6a4 knockout mice [49] and the dopamine transporter knockouts [50]. In addition, there are dysfunctional dominance behaviors linked to synaptic proteins such as Shank and Synapsin [51,52,53].

At the same time, there are also evidences that implicate environmental conditions, such as stress and “rank inheritance” leading to epigenetic alterations that affect dominance [54, 55]. In addition, the prior history of each animal and his winning/losing experience also play a role in future encounters [56, 57]. With this in mind, we designed our RRTT trials to ensure there are CTR versus CTR trials, to mitigate the possibility of the “winner effect” [57], and guarantee that some CTR mice also lose before first encountering ELS mice. Importantly, our data show that there is a stable dominance gradient persisting for several weeks, even when mice are not co-habiting the same cage. This “meta-hierarchy” allowed us to robustly predict the intra-cage rank of male mice before they competed against cage-mates. This implies that dominance is not merely imparted via physical contests in the home cage, and that the position in a meta-hierarchy is transitive to the broad group of animals. However, the question of how mice transmit, recognize, and calculate social dominance cues in a tube test is not well understood, and may potentially arise from a combination of procedural behavioral interactions (e.g. push, resist, retreat) [14], odors [58], or other sensorial communications that may signal rank (e.g. whisker position) [59].

After a broad analysis of altered transcripts in the mPFC of ELS mice we focused our attention on Npy1r, a G-protein coupled receptor that has been linked to maternal care and anxiety [60], foraging behaviors [61], and regulation of social behaviors [34]. From our findings via RNAseq analysis of the mPFC, we postulated that Npy1r could mediate behavioral adaptations linked to subordinance and increased risk-taking behavior.

At the synaptic level, our observation of increased amplitude of inhibitory postsynaptic currents is in line with evidences linking NPY1R as a potentiator of GABA-mediated currents [30, 62]. We also speculate that the most parsimonious explanation for the results in increased inhibitory tone are due to enhanced NPY1R activity, as these data are supported by RNAseq, qRT-PCR, and pharmacological data. However, another contributing factor could be linked to the location of NPYergic activity, since in the cortex, NPY neurons have been proposed to sit close to cortical layer I [63]. Therefore, the observation of neuronal hypotrophy in layer II/III pyramidal neurons, could contribute electrotonically to an enhancement of NPYergic activity if these synapses are now occurring closer to the soma. Also, our recordings from adult mice, provides a view on a mature circuitry, which complements evidence that normally focus on animals of younger ages. This is important to consider, since prenatal insults have been shown to lead to age–dependent, biphasic changes in the inhibitory system [64].

Anxiety levels, in both mice and humans, have also been linked to social dominance [65,66,67]. These observations directly intersect with recognized anxiolytic and antistress modulatory actions of NPY [68, 69]. Therefore, future work should aim at dissecting if NPYergic signaling in the mPFC is necessary and sufficient to modulate social dominant behaviors, and explore the role of this neuropeptide in frontal cortico-striatal circuitry, a key pathway in social dominance [65, 67]. Another important aspect to also consider is if the changes in NPYergic activity are a compensatory mechanism, and how specifically bolstering/inhibiting this receptor in the frontal cortex modulates behavior in the context of ELS.

Altogether, this work identifies an adaptive behavioral strategy in animals that are subjected to ELS and implicates NPY1R as a regulator of critical changes in mPFC circuitry. This receptor and the control of inhibitory synaptic activity are potential targets to better understand the effects of chronic stress and of persistent social subordination in adult life.

Funding and disclosure

This research was supported by the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT) Investigator Program IF/00812/2012, FCT grant POCI-01-0145-FEDER-016682, Marie Curie Career Integration Grant (#618525 to JP) and Marie Curie Individual Fellowhip (#799164 to CMS), NARSAD Young Investigator Grant from the Brain & Behavior Research Foundation (#20733), and Bial Foundation Grant 266/2016 (to JP) and 264/2016 (to ALC). We thank the support from FEDER/COMPETE institutional funds POCI-01-0145-FEDER-007440, BrainHealth 2020 CENTRO-01-0145-FEDER-000008; fellowships SFRH/BD/51961/2012 (to LOF), SFRH/BD/105878/2014 (MIT-Portugal to MJC), SFRH/BPD/120611/2016 (to JRG), SFRH/BD/144224/2019 (to PAF),  SFRH/BD/144875/2019 (to JC) and SFRH/BD/51958/2012 (to ME). The authors declare no conflict of interest.


  1. 1.

    Hawkley LC, Cacioppo JT. Loneliness matters: a theoretical and empirical review of consequences and mechanisms. Ann Behav Med. 2010;40:218–27.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Sapolsky RM. The influence of social hierarchy on primate health. Science. 2005;308:648–52.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Kessler RC, Price RH, Wortman CB. Social factors in psychopathology: stress, social support, and coping processes. Annu Rev Psychol. 1985;36:531–72.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Calhoun JB. Population density and social pathology. Sci Am. 1962;206:139–48.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Sandi C, Haller J. Stress and the social brain: behavioural effects and neurobiological mechanisms. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2015;16:290–304.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Wang F, Zhu J, Zhu H, Zhang Q, Lin Z, Hu H. Bidirectional control of social hierarchy by synaptic efficacy in medial prefrontal cortex. Science. 2011;334:693–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Zink CF, Tong Y, Chen Q, Bassett DS, Stein JL, Meyer-Lindenberg A. Know your place: neural processing of social hierarchy in humans. Neuron. 2008;58:273–83.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Arnsten AF. Stress weakens prefrontal networks: molecular insults to higher cognition. Nat Neurosci. 2015;18:1376–85.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Diorio D, Viau V, Meaney MJ. The role of the medial prefrontal cortex (cingulate gyrus) in the regulation of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal responses to stress. J Neurosci. 1993;13:3839–47.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Dias-Ferreira E, Sousa JC, Melo I, Morgado P, Mesquita AR, Cerqueira JJ, et al. Chronic stress causes frontostriatal reorganization and affects decision-making. Science. 2009;325:621–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Anderson SW, Bechara A, Damasio H, Tranel D, Damasio AR. Impairment of social and moral behavior related to early damage in human prefrontal cortex. Nat Neurosci. 1999;2:1032–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Yosida S, Okanoya K. Bilateral lesions of the medial frontal cortex disrupt recognition of social hierarchy during antiphonal communication in naked mole-rats (Heterocephalus glaber). J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2012;198:109–17.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Holson RR, Walker C. Mesial prefrontal cortical lesions and timidity in rats. II. Reactivity to novel stimuli. Physiol Behav. 1986;37:231–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Zhou T, Zhu H, Fan Z, Wang F, Chen Y, Liang H, et al. History of winning remodels thalamo-PFC circuit to reinforce social dominance. Science. 2017;357:162–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Benner S, Endo T, Kakeyama M, Tohyama C. Environmental insults in early life and submissiveness later in life in mouse models. Front Neurosci. 2015;9:91.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Benner S, Endo T, Endo N, Kakeyama M, Tohyama C. Early deprivation induces competitive subordinance in C57BL/6 male mice. Physiol Behav. 2014;137:42–52.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Edfawy M, Guedes JR, Pereira MI, Laranjo M, Carvalho MJ, Gao X, et al. Abnormal mGluR-mediated synaptic plasticity and autism-like behaviours in Gprasp2 mutant mice. Nat Commun. 2019;10:1431.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Peca J, Feliciano C, Ting JT, Wang W, Wells MF, Venkatraman TN, et al. Shank3 mutant mice display autistic-like behaviours and striatal dysfunction. Nature. 2011;472:437–42.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Barros-Viegas AT, Carmona V, Ferreiro E, Guedes J, Cardoso AM, Cunha P, et al. miRNA-31 improves cognition and abolishes amyloid-beta pathology by targeting APP and BACE1 in an animal model of Alzheimer’s disease. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids. 2020;19:1219–36.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Weiss IC, Franklin TB, Vizi S, Mansuy IM. Inheritable effect of unpredictable maternal separation on behavioral responses in mice. Front Behav Neurosci. 2011;5:3.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Franklin TB, Russig H, Weiss IC, Graff J, Linder N, Michalon A, et al. Epigenetic transmission of the impact of early stress across generations. Biol Psychiatry. 2010;68:408–15.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Miller EK, Cohen JD. An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2001;24:167–202.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Radley JJ, Sisti HM, Hao J, Rocher AB, McCall T, Hof PR, et al. Chronic behavioral stress induces apical dendritic reorganization in pyramidal neurons of the medial prefrontal cortex. Neuroscience. 2004;125:1–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Li JT, Xie XM, Yu JY, Sun YX, Liao XM, Wang XX, et al. Suppressed calbindin levels in hippocampal excitatory neurons mediate stress-induced memory loss. Cell Rep. 2017;21:891–900.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Helmeke C, Ovtscharoff W Jr., Poeggel G, Braun K. Imbalance of immunohistochemically characterized interneuron populations in the adolescent and adult rodent medial prefrontal cortex after repeated exposure to neonatal separation stress. Neuroscience. 2008;152:18–28.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Howell BR, McCormack KM, Grand AP, Sawyer NT, Zhang X, Maestripieri D, et al. Brain white matter microstructure alterations in adolescent rhesus monkeys exposed to early life stress: associations with high cortisol during infancy. Biol Mood Anxiety Disord. 2013;3:21.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Yang Y, Cheng Z, Tang H, Jiao H, Sun X, Cui Q, et al. Neonatal maternal separation impairs prefrontal cortical myelination and cognitive functions in rats through activation of wnt signaling. Cereb Cortex. 2017;27:2871–84.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Cuccurazzu B, Bortolotto V, Valente MM, Ubezio F, Koverech A, Canonico PL, et al. Upregulation of mGlu2 receptors via NF-kappaB p65 acetylation is involved in the proneurogenic and antidepressant effects of acetyl-l-carnitine. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2013;38:2220–30.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Nasca C, Bigio B, Zelli D, Nicoletti F, McEwen BS. Mind the gap: glucocorticoids modulate hippocampal glutamate tone underlying individual differences in stress susceptibility. Mol Psychiatry. 2015;20:755–63.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Hendry SH, Jones EG, DeFelipe J, Schmechel D, Brandon C, Emson PC. Neuropeptide-containing neurons of the cerebral cortex are also GABAergic. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 1984;81:6526–30.

  31. 31.

    Vollmer LL, Schmeltzer S, Schurdak J, Ahlbrand R, Rush J, Dolgas CM, et al. Neuropeptide Y impairs retrieval of extinguished fear and modulates excitability of neurons in the infralimbic prefrontal cortex. J Neurosci. 2016;36:1306–15.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Bacci A, Huguenard JR, Prince DA. Differential modulation of synaptic transmission by neuropeptide Y in rat neocortical neurons. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002;99:17125–30.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Heilig M. The NPY system in stress, anxiety and depression. Neuropeptides. 2004;38:213–24.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    de Bono M, Bargmann CI. Natural variation in a neuropeptide Y receptor homolog modifies social behavior and food response in C. elegans. Cell 1998;94:679–89.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    McEwen BS, Nasca C, Gray JD. Stress effects on neuronal structure: hippocampus, amygdala, and prefrontal cortex. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2016;41:3–23.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Lupien SJ, McEwen BS, Gunnar MR, Heim C. Effects of stress throughout the lifespan on the brain, behaviour and cognition. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2009;10:434–45.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Reus GZ, Stringari RB, Ribeiro KF, Cipriano AL, Panizzutti BS, Stertz L, et al. Maternal deprivation induces depressive-like behaviour and alters neurotrophin levels in the rat brain. Neurochem Res. 2011;36:460–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Mourlon V, Baudin A, Blanc O, Lauber A, Giros B, Naudon L, et al. Maternal deprivation induces depressive-like behaviours only in female rats. Behav Brain Res. 2010;213:278–87.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Marais L, van Rensburg SJ, van Zyl JM, Stein DJ, Daniels WM. Maternal separation of rat pups increases the risk of developing depressive-like behavior after subsequent chronic stress by altering corticosterone and neurotrophin levels in the hippocampus. Neurosci Res. 2008;61:106–12.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Christian JJ. Social subordination, population density, and mammalian evolution. Science. 1970;168:84–90.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    J. B. C. Space and the strategy of life. In: A. H. E, ed. Behavior and environment. Boston, MA: Springer; 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Wilson EO. Sociobiology: the new synthesis 25th anniversary edition. Cambridge, Mass: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Eklund MB, Arborelius L. Twice daily long maternal separations in Wistar rats decreases anxiety-like behaviour in females but does not affect males. Behav Brain Res. 2006;172:278–85.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Slotten HA, Kalinichev M, Hagan JJ, Marsden CA, Fone KC. Long-lasting changes in behavioural and neuroendocrine indices in the rat following neonatal maternal separation: gender-dependent effects. Brain Res. 2006;1097:123–32.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Masur J, Benedito MA. Genetic selection of winner and loser rats in a competitive situation. Nature. 1974;249:284.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Moore AJ, Haynes KF, Preziosi RF, Moore PJ. The evolution of interacting phenotypes: genetics and evolution of social dominance. Am Nat. 2002;160:S186–97.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    van der Kooij MA, Sandi C. The genetics of social hierarchies. Curr Opin Behav Sci. 2015;2:52–7.

    Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Robinson GE, Grozinger CM, Whitfield CW. Sociogenomics: social life in molecular terms. Nat Rev Genet. 2005;6:257–70.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Lewejohann L, Kloke V, Heiming RS, Jansen F, Kaiser S, Schmitt A, et al. Social status and day-to-day behaviour of male serotonin transporter knockout mice. Behav Brain Res. 2010;211:220–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Rodriguiz RM, Chu R, Caron MG, Wetsel WC. Aberrant responses in social interaction of dopamine transporter knockout mice. Behav Brain Res. 2004;148:185–98.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Greco B, Manago F, Tucci V, Kao HT, Valtorta F, Benfenati F. Autism-related behavioral abnormalities in synapsin knockout mice. Behav Brain Res. 2013;251:65–74.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Zhou Y, Kaiser T, Monteiro P, Zhang X, Van der Goes MS, Wang D, et al. Mice with Shank3 mutations associated with ASD and schizophrenia display both shared and distinct defects. Neuron. 2016;89:147–62.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Nesher E, Koman I, Gross M, Tikhonov T, Bairachnaya M, Salmon-Divon M, et al. Synapsin IIb as a functional marker of submissive behavior. Sci Rep. 2015;5:10287.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Engh AL, Esch K, Smale L, Holekamp KE. Mechanisms of maternal rank ‘inheritance’ in the spotted hyaena, Crocuta crocuta. Anim Behav. 2000;60:323–32.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Cavigelli SA, Caruso MJ. Sex, social status and physiological stress in primates: the importance of social and glucocorticoid dynamics. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2015;370:1669.

    Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Oyegbile TO, Marler CA. Winning fights elevates testosterone levels in California mice and enhances future ability to win fights. Horm Behav. 2005;48:259–67.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Dugatkin LA, Earley RL. Individual recognition, dominance hierarchies and winner and loser effects. Proc Biol Sci/R Soc. 2004;271:1537–40.

  58. 58.

    Hurst JL, Beynon RJ. Scent wars: the chemobiology of competitive signalling in mice. Bioessays. 2004;26:1288–98.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Wolfe J, Mende C, Brecht M. Social facial touch in rats. Behav Neurosci. 2011;125:900–10.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Bertocchi I, Oberto A, Longo A, Mele P, Sabetta M, Bartolomucci A, et al. Regulatory functions of limbic Y1 receptors in body weight and anxiety uncovered by conditional knockout and maternal care. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108:19395–400.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Padilla SL, Qiu J, Soden ME, Sanz E, Nestor CC, Barker FD, et al. Agouti-related peptide neural circuits mediate adaptive behaviors in the starved state. Nat Neurosci. 2016;19:734–41.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Sun QQ, Akk G, Huguenard JR, Prince DA. Differential regulation of GABA release and neuronal excitability mediated by neuropeptide Y1 and Y2 receptors in rat thalamic neurons. J Physiol. 2001;531:81–94.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Lim L, Mi D, Llorca A, Marin O. Development and functional diversification of cortical interneurons. Neuron. 2018;100:294–313.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Thion MS, Mosser CA, Ferezou I, Grisel P, Baptista S, Low D, et al. Biphasic impact of prenatal inflammation and macrophage depletion on the wiring of neocortical inhibitory circuits. Cell Rep. 2019;28:1119–26.e4.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Hollis F, van der Kooij MA, Zanoletti O, Lozano L, Canto C, Sandi C. Mitochondrial function in the brain links anxiety with social subordination. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2015;112:15486–91.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Goette L, Bendahan S, Thoresen J, Hollis F, Sandi C. Stress pulls us apart: anxiety leads to differences in competitive confidence under stress. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2015;54:115–23.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    van der Kooij MA, Hollis F, Lozano L, Zalachoras I, Abad S, Zanoletti O, et al. Diazepam actions in the VTA enhance social dominance and mitochondrial function in the nucleus accumbens by activation of dopamine D1 receptors. Mol Psychiatry. 2018;23:569–78.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Yamada S, Islam MS, van Kooten N, Bovee S, Oh YM, Tsujimura A, et al. Neuropeptide Y neurons in the nucleus accumbens modulate anxiety-like behavior. Exp Neurol. 2020;327:113216.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Reichmann F, Holzer P. Neuropeptide Y: a stressful review. Neuropeptides. 2016;55:99–109.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references


We thank L. Cortes and MICC for assistance with imaging, C. Semião and S. Freire for animal husbandry; Y. Kasai (Mount Sinai School of Medicine) for assistance with RNAseq analysis and P.F. Carvalho (U.C. Department of Architecture) with assistance on RNAseq data visualization. We thank A.L. Carvalho, C.B. Duarte, and members of the J.P. lab for helpful discussion and comments.

Author information




LOF, MJC, JC, PAF, JRG, RS, ME, participated in the execution and analysis of experiments. LOF, MJC, ALC, CMS, and JP interpreted the results. LOF, ALC, and JP designed the experiments; LOF, MJC, and JP wrote the paper. All authors edited and approved the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to João Peça.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Franco, L.O., Carvalho, M.J., Costa, J. et al. Social subordination induced by early life adversity rewires inhibitory control of the prefrontal cortex via enhanced Npy1r signaling. Neuropsychopharmacol. 45, 1438–1447 (2020).

Download citation