Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Computational phenotyping and longitudinal dynamics to inform clinical decision-making in psychiatry

This is a preview of subscription content

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: Still visualization portraying the post-intervention temporal trajectories of three hypothetical biotypes (synthetic data in green, blue, and red) along three Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) neurobehavioral dimensions (a brain-based measure, cognitive control, and social processes task scores).

References

  1. 1.

    Clementz BA, Sweeney JA, Hamm JP, Ivleva EI, Ethridge LE, Pearlson GD, et al. Identification of distinct psychosis biotypes using brain-based biomarkers. Am J Psychiatry. 2016;173:373–84.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Drysdale AT, Grosenick L, Downar J, Dunlop K, Mansouri F, Meng Y, et al. Resting-state connectivity biomarkers define neurophysiological subtypes of depression. Nat Med. 2017;23:28–38.

    CAS  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Rutledge RB, Moutoussis M, Smittenaar P, Zeidman P, Taylor T, Hrynkiewicz L, et al. Association of neural and emotional impacts of reward prediction errors with major depression. JAMA Psychiatry. 2017;74:790–7.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Keren H, O’Callaghan G, Vidal-Ribas P, Buzzell GA, Brotman MA, Leibenluft E, et al. Reward processing in depression: a conceptual and meta-analytic review across fMRI and EEG studies. Am J Psychiatry. 2018;175:1111–20.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Krystal AD, Pizzagalli DA, Smoski M, Mathew SJ, Nurnberger J, Lisanby SH, et al. A randomized proof-of-mechanism trial applying the ‘fast-fail’ approach to evaluating κ-opioid antagonism as a treatment for anhedonia. Nat Med. 2020;26:760–8.

    CAS  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Pedersen T, Robinson D. gganimate: A grammar of animated graphics. R package version 0.9.9.9999. 2017. http://github.com/thomasp85/gganimate

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

M.F. created the simulation and the figure and wrote the manuscript. J.A.G. wrote the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joshua A. Gordon.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ferrante, M., Gordon, J.A. Computational phenotyping and longitudinal dynamics to inform clinical decision-making in psychiatry. Neuropsychopharmacol. 46, 243–244 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41386-020-00852-z

Download citation

Search

Quick links