Nucleus accumbens volume as a predictor of anxiety symptom improvement following CBT and SSRI treatment in two independent samples

Article metrics

Abstract

Structural variations of neural regions implicated in fear responses have been well documented in the pathophysiology of anxiety and may play an important role in treatment response. We examined whether gray matter volume of three neural regions supporting fear and avoidance responses [bilateral amygdala, nucleus accumbens (NAcc), and ventromedial prefrontal cortex (PFC)] predicted cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) treatment outcome in two independent samples of patients with anxiety disorders. Study 1 consisted of 81 adults with anxiety disorders and Study 2 included 55 children and adolescents with anxiety disorders. In both studies, patients completed baseline structural MRI scans and received either CBT or SSRI treatment. Clinician-rated interviews of anxiety symptoms were assessed at baseline and posttreatment. Among the adult sample, greater pre-treatment bilateral NAcc volume was associated with a greater reduction in clinician-rated anxiety symptoms pre-to-post CBT and SSRI treatment. Greater left NAcc volume also predicted greater decreases in clinician-rated anxiety symptoms pre-to-post CBT and SSRI treatment among youth with current anxiety. Across studies, results were similar across treatments, and findings were maintained when adjusting for patient’s age, sex, and total intracranial brain volume. We found no evidence for baseline amygdala or ventromedial PFC volume serving as treatment predictors across the two samples. Together, these findings provide promising support for the role of NAcc volume as an objective marker of anxiety treatment improvement that spans across development. Future studies should clarify the specific mechanisms through which NAcc volume exerts its therapeutic effects.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: NAcc volume and adult anxiety treatment response.
Fig. 2: NAcc volume and youth anxiety treatment response.

References

  1. 1.

    Baxter AJ, Vos T, Scott KM, Ferrari AJ, Whiteford HA. The global burden of anxiety disorders in 2010. Psychol Med. 2014;44:2363–74.

  2. 2.

    Steel Z, Marnane C, Iranpour C, Chey T, Jackson JW, Patel V, et al. The global prevalence of common mental disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis 1980–2013. Int J Epidemiol. 2014;43:476–93.

  3. 3.

    Butler AC, Chapman JE, Forman EM, Beck AT. The empirical status of cognitive-behavioral therapy: a review of meta-analyses. Clin Psychol Rev. 2006;26:17–31.

  4. 4.

    Ravindran LN, Stein MB. The pharmacologic treatment of anxiety disorders: a review of progress. J Clin Psychiatry. 2010;71:839–54.

  5. 5.

    Hofmann SG, Asnaani A, Vonk IJ, Sawyer AT, Fang A. The efficacy of cognitive behavioral therapy: a review of meta-analyses. Cogn Ther Res. 2012;36:427–40.

  6. 6.

    Baldwin DS, Anderson IM, Nutt DJ, Allgulander C, Bandelow B, den Boer JA, et al. Evidence-based pharmacological treatment of anxiety disorders, post-traumatic stress disorder and obsessive-compulsive disorder: a revision of the 2005 guidelines from the British Association for Psychopharmacology. J Psychopharmacol. 2014;28:403–39.

  7. 7.

    Bauer I, Wilansky-Traynor P, Rector NA. Cognitive-behavioral therapy for anxiety disorders with comorbid depression: a review. Int J Cogn Ther. 2012;5:118–56.

  8. 8.

    Mobach L, Gould K, Hudson JL Comorbidity in Childhood Anxiety Disorders. In Pediatric Anxiety Disorders 2019 Jan (pp. 277–98). Academic Press.

  9. 9.

    Gadermann AM, Alonso J, Vilagut G, Zaslavsky AM, Kessler RC. Comorbidity and disease burden in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication (NCS‐R). Depress Anx. 2012;29:797–806.

  10. 10.

    Shin LM, Liberzon I. The neurocircuitry of fear, stress, and anxiety disorders. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2010;35:169–91.

  11. 11.

    Levita L, Hoskin R, Champi S. Avoidance of harm and anxiety: a role for the nucleus accumbens. Neuroimage. 2012;62:189–98.

  12. 12.

    Maren S. Pavlovian fear conditioning as a behavioral assay for hippocampus and amygdala function: cautions and caveats. Eur J Neurosci. 2008;28:1661–6.

  13. 13.

    Quirk GJ, Russo GK, Barron JL, Lebron K. The role of ventromedial prefrontal cortex in the recovery of extinguished fear. J Neurosci. 2000;20:6225–31.

  14. 14.

    Phelps EA, LeDoux JE. Contributions of the amygdala to emotion processing: from animal models to human behavior. Neuron. 2005;48:175–87.

  15. 15.

    Phelps EA, Delgado MR, Nearing KI, LeDoux JE. Extinction learning in humans: role of the amygdala and ventromedial PFC. Neuron. 2004;43:897–905.

  16. 16.

    Delgado MR, Nearing KI, LeDoux JE, Phelps EA. Neural circuitry underlying the regulation of conditioned fear and its relation to extinction. Neuron. 2008;59:829–38.

  17. 17.

    Wendler E, Gaspar JC, Ferreira TL, Barbiero JK, Andreatini R, Vital MA, et al. The roles of the nucleus accumbens core, dorsomedial striatum, and dorsolateral striatum in learning: performance and extinction of Pavlovian fear-conditioned responses and instrumental avoidance responses. Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2014;109:27–36.

  18. 18.

    Kalin NH, Shelton SE, Fox AS, Oakes TR, Davidson RJ. Brain regions associated with the expression and contextual regulation of anxiety in primates. Biol Psychiatry. 2005;58:796–804.

  19. 19.

    Fisler MS, Federspiel A, Horn H, Dierks T, Schmitt W, Wiest R, et al. Spider phobia is associated with decreased left amygdala volume: a cross-sectional study. BMC Psychiatry. 2013;13:70.

  20. 20.

    Hayano F, Nakamura M, Asami T, Uehara K, Yoshida T, Roppongi T, et al. Smaller amygdala is associated with anxiety in patients with panic disorder. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2009;63:266–76.

  21. 21.

    Irle E, Ruhleder M, Lange C, Seidler-Brandler U, Salzer S, Dechent P, et al. Reduced amygdalar and hippocampal size in adults with generalized social phobia. J Psychiatry Neurosci. 2010;35:126–31.

  22. 22.

    Milham MP, Nugent AC, Drevets WC, Dickstein DS, Leibenluft E, Ernst M, et al. Selective reduction in amygdala volume in pediatric anxiety disorders: a voxel-based morphometry investigation. Biol Psychiatry. 2005;57:961–6.

  23. 23.

    Morey RA, Gold AL, LaBar KS, Beall SK, Brown VM, Haswell CC, et al. Amygdala volume changes in posttraumatic stress disorder in a large case-controlled veterans group. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2012;69:1169–78.

  24. 24.

    Alemany S, Mas A, Goldberg X, Falcón C, Fatjó-Vilas M, Arias B, et al. Regional gray matter reductions are associated with genetic liability for anxiety and depression: an MRI twin study. J Affect Disord. 2013;149:175–81.

  25. 25.

    Siegle GJ, Konecky RO, Thase ME, Carter CS. Relationships between amygdala volume and activity during emotional information processing tasks in depressed and never‐depressed individuals: an fMRI investigation. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2003;985:481–4.

  26. 26.

    De Bellis MD, Casey BJ, Dahl RE, Birmaher B, Williamson DE, Thomas KM, et al. A pilot study of amygdala volumes in pediatric generalized anxiety disorder. Biol Psychiatry. 2000;48:51–57.

  27. 27.

    Schienle A, Ebner F, Schäfer A. Localized gray matter volume abnormalities in generalized anxiety disorder. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2011;261:303–7.

  28. 28.

    Liao W, Xu Q, Mantini D, Ding J, Machado-de-Sousa JP, Hallak JE, et al. Altered gray matter morphometry and resting-state functional and structural connectivity in social anxiety disorder. Brain Res. 2011;1388:167–77.

  29. 29.

    Günther V, Ihme K, Kersting A, Hoffmann KT, Lobsien D, Suslow T. Volumetric associations between amygdala, nucleus accumbens, and socially anxious tendencies in healthy women. Neurosci. 2018;374:25–32.

  30. 30.

    Kühn S, Schubert F, Gallinat J. Structural correlates of trait anxiety: reduced thickness in medial orbitofrontal cortex accompanied by volume increase in nucleus accumbens. J Affect Disord. 2011;134:315–9.

  31. 31.

    Lago T, Davis A, Grillon C, Ernst M. Striatum on the anxiety map: small detours into adolescence. Brain Res. 2017;1654:177–84.

  32. 32.

    Ball TM, Stein MB, Ramsawh HJ, Campbell-Sills L, Paulus MP. Single-subject anxiety treatment outcome prediction using functional neuroimaging. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2014;39:1254–61.

  33. 33.

    Gabrieli JD, Ghosh SS, Whitfield-Gabrieli S. Prediction as a humanitarian and pragmatic contribution from human cognitive neuroscience. Neuron. 2015;85:11–26.

  34. 34.

    Bryant RA, Felmingham K, Whitford TJ, Kemp A, Hughes G, Peduto A, et al. Rostral anterior cingulate volume predicts treatment response to cognitive-behavioural therapy for posttraumatic stress disorder. J Psychiatry Neurosci. 2008;33:142–6.

  35. 35.

    Levy-Gigi E, Szabó C, Kelemen O, Kéri S. Association among clinical response, hippocampal volume, and FKBP5 gene expression in individuals with posttraumatic stress disorder receiving cognitive behavioral therapy. Bio Psychiatry. 2013;74:793–800.

  36. 36.

    Reinecke A, Thilo K, Filippini N, Croft A, Harmer CJ. Predicting rapid response to cognitive-behavioural treatment for panic disorder: the role of hippocampus, insula, and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Behav Res Ther. 2014;62:120–8.

  37. 37.

    Bauer EP. Serotonin in fear conditioning processes. Behav Brain Res. 2015;277:68–77.

  38. 38.

    Brooks SJ, Stein DJ. A systematic review of the neural bases of psychotherapy for anxiety and related disorders. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2015;17:261–79.

  39. 39.

    Faria V, Appel L, Åhs F, Linnman C, Pissiota A, Frans Ö, et al. Amygdala subregions tied to SSRI and placebo response in patients with social anxiety disorder. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2012;37:2222–32.

  40. 40.

    Gorka SM, Young CB, Klumpp H, Kennedy AE, Francis J, Ajilore O, et al. Emotion-based brain mechanisms and predictors for SSRI and CBT treatment of anxiety and depression: a randomized trial. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2019;44:1639–48.

  41. 41.

    Phan KL, Coccaro EF, Angstadt M, Kreger KJ, Mayberg HS, Liberzon I, et al. Corticolimbic brain reactivity to social signals of threat before and after sertraline treatment in generalized social phobia. Biol Psychiatry. 2013;73:329–36.

  42. 42.

    Young KS, Burklund LJ, Torre JB, Saxbe D, Lieberman MD, Craske MG. Treatment for social anxiety disorder alters functional connectivity in emotion regulation neural circuitry. Psychiatry Res. 2017;261:44–51.

  43. 43.

    Bryant RA, Felmingham K, Kemp A, Das P, Hughes G, Peduto A, et al. Amygdala and ventral anterior cingulate activation predicts treatment response to cognitive behaviour therapy for post-traumatic stress disorder. Psychol Med. 2008;38:555–61.

  44. 44.

    McClure EB, Adler A, Monk CS, Cameron J, Smith S, Nelson EE, et al. fMRI predictors of treatment outcome in pediatric anxiety disorders. Psychopharmacology. 2007;191:97–105.

  45. 45.

    Whalen PJ, Johnstone T, Somerville LH, Nitschke JB, Polis S, Alexander AL, et al. A functional magnetic resonance imaging predictor of treatment response to venlafaxine in generalized anxiety disorder. Biol Psychiatry. 2008;63:858–63.

  46. 46.

    Klumpp H, Fitzgerald DA, Angstadt M, Post D, Phan KL. Neural response during attentional control and emotion processing predicts improvement after cognitive behavioral therapy in generalized social anxiety disorder. Psychol Med. 2014;44:3109–21.

  47. 47.

    Kujawa A, Swain JE, Hanna GL, Koschmann E, Simpson D, Connolly S, et al. Prefrontal reactivity to social signals of threat as a predictor of treatment response in anxious youth. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2016;41:1983.

  48. 48.

    Wonderlick JS, Ziegler DA, Hosseini-Varnamkhasti P, Locascio JJ, Bakkour A, Van Der Kouwe A, et al. Reliability of MRI-derived cortical and subcortical morphometric measures: effects of pulse sequence, voxel geometry, and parallel imaging. Neuroimage. 2009;44:1324–33.

  49. 49.

    Elliott ML, Knodt AR, Ireland D, Morris ML, Poulton R, Ramrakha S, et al. Poor test-retest reliability of task-fMRI: new empirical evidence and a meta-analysis. bioRxiv. 2019; 681700.

  50. 50.

    Jones PB. Adult mental health disorders and their age at onset. Br J Psychiatry. 2013;202:s5–s10.

  51. 51.

    Boekel W, Wagenmakers EJ, Belay L, Verhagen J, Brown S, Forstmann BU. A purely confirmatory replication study of structural brain-behavior correlations. Cortex. 2015;66:115–33.

  52. 52.

    Button KS, Ioannidis JP, Mokrysz C, Nosek BA, Flint J, Robinson ES, et al. Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2013;14:365.

  53. 53.

    Lovibond SH, Lovibond PF. Manual for the depression anxiety stress scales. Psychology Foundation of Australia; 1996.

  54. 54.

    First MB, Williams JB, Karg RS, Spitzer RL Structured clinical interview for DSM-5—Research version (SCID-5 for DSM-5, research version; SCID-5-RV). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Association; 2015:1–94.

  55. 55.

    Hamilton MAX. The assessment of anxiety states by rating. B J Med Psychol. 1959;32:50–55.

  56. 56.

    Hamilton MA. A rating scale for depression. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1960;23:56.

  57. 57.

    Barlow DH, Craske MG Mastery of your anxiety and panic. Oxford University Press; 2006.

  58. 58.

    Beck AT (Ed.). Cognitive therapy of depression. Guilford Press; 1979.

  59. 59.

    Craske MG, Barlow DH, O’Leary TA. Mastery of your anxiety and worry. Graywind Publications; 1991.

  60. 60.

    Kaufman J, Birmaher B, Brent D, Rao UMA, Flynn C, Moreci P, et al. Schedule for affective disorders and schizophrenia for school-age children-present and lifetime version (K-SADS-PL): initial reliability and validity data. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1997;36:980–8.

  61. 61.

    Research Units of Pediatric Psychopharmacology Anxiety Study Group. The Pediatric Anxiety Rating Scale (PARS): development and psychometric properties. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2002;41:1061–9.

  62. 62.

    Kovacs M. Children’s depression inventory: Manual. North Tonawanda, NY: Multi-Health Systems; 1992.

  63. 63.

    Kendall PC, Choudhury S, Hudson J, Webb A. The C.A.T. Project Workbook. Ardmore, PA, USA: Worbook Publishing; 2002.

  64. 64.

    Kendall PC, Hedtke K Coping. Cat Workbook, 2nd edn. Worbook Publishing: Ardmore, PA, USA; 2006.

  65. 65.

    Dale A, Fischl B, Sereno M. Cortical surface-based analysis: I. segmentation and surface reconstruction. Neuroimage. 1999;9:179–94.

  66. 66.

    Fischl B, Salat D, Busa E, Albert M, Dieterich M, Haselgrove C, et al. Whole brain segmentation: automated labeling of neuroanatomical structures in the human brain. Neuron. 2002;33:341–55.

  67. 67.

    Desikan R, Ségonne F, Fischl B, Quinn B, Dickerson B, Blacker D, et al. An automated labeling system for subdividing the human cerebral cortex on MRI scans into gyral based regions of interest. Neuroimage. 2006;31:968–80.

  68. 68.

    Fischl B. Automatically parcellating the human cerebral cortex. Cereb Cortex. 2004;14:11–22.

  69. 69.

    Fischl B, Dale A. Measuring the thickness of the human cerebral cortex from magnetic resonance images. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2000;97:11050–5.

  70. 70.

    Han X, Jovicich J, Salat D, van der Kouwe A, Quinn B, Czanner S, et al. Reliability of MRI-derived measurements of human cerebral cortical thickness: the effects of field strength, scanner upgrade and manufacturer. Neuroimage. 2006;32:180–94.

  71. 71.

    Levita L, Hare TA, Voss HU, Glover G, Ballon DJ, Casey BJ. The bivalent side of the nucleus accumbens. Neuroimage. 2009;44:1178–87.

  72. 72.

    Burhans LB, Gabriel M. Contextual modulation of conditioned responses: role of the ventral subiculum and nucleus accumbens. Behav Neurosci. 2007;121:1243–57.

  73. 73.

    Manago F, Castellano C, Oliverio A, Mele A, De Leonibus E. Role of dopamine receptors subtypes, D1-like and D2-like, within the nucleus accumbens subregions, core and shell, on memory consolidation in the one-trial inhibitory avoidance task. Learn Mem. 2009;16:46–52.

  74. 74.

    Schoenbaum G, Setlow B. Lesions of nucleus accumbens disrupt learning about aversive outcomes. J Neurosci. 2003;23:9833–41.

  75. 75.

    Kitaichi Y, Inoue T, Nakagawa S, Boku S, Kakuta A, Izumi T, et al. Sertraline increases extracellular levels not only of serotonin, but also of dopamine in the nucleus accumbens and striatum of rats. Eur J Pharm. 2010;647:90–96.

  76. 76.

    Pine DS. Research review: a neuroscience framework for pediatric anxiety disorders. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2007;48:631–48.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank James Swain, M.D., Ph.D., Gregory Hanna, M.D., Elizabeth Koschmann, Ph.D., David Simpson, Ph.D., L.C.S.W., Sucheta Connolly, M.D., and Jennifer Francis, Ph.D. for their help in providing therapeutic services for the current study.

Author information

Correspondence to Katie L. Burkhouse.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Burkhouse, K.L., Jagan Jimmy, Defelice, N. et al. Nucleus accumbens volume as a predictor of anxiety symptom improvement following CBT and SSRI treatment in two independent samples. Neuropsychopharmacol. (2019) doi:10.1038/s41386-019-0575-5

Download citation