Introduction

Abuse of, and addiction to, the psychostimulant methamphetamine (METH) is a rapidly growing public health concern and is the second most abused illicit drug worldwide [1]. Methamphetamine addiction is characterised by chronic relapse, and often co-occurs with anxiety [2, 3], which may contribute to heightened relapse risk [4]. There are currently no approved pharmacotherapies which prevent relapse to METH addiction [5]. The neuropeptide oxytocin has shown substantial promise in the preclinical literature as a potent inhibitor of METH self-administration [6,7,8], METH reward [9, 10], cue-induced relapse [8, 11, 12], METH-induced relapse [6, 13,14,15], and yohimbine-induced relapse [7, 16]. The social [17] and anxiolytic [18] effects of oxytocin treatment may have added benefits for METH-dependent individuals. Together, these promising findings from animal models have set the stage for the pre-registration of the first randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial investigating the effects of oxytocin as an adjunct to psychosocial therapy in humans with a METH-use disorder [19]. However, clinical utility will require chronic treatment with oxytocin, the effects of which have not been widely investigated.

Within the preclinical addiction field, the effects of chronic oxytocin treatment have only been investigated prior to access to the addictive drug, and typically during a crucial developmental window. For example, rats treated for 10 days with oxytocin during adolescence exhibited reduced free-consumption of alcoholic beer [20] and reduced motivation to self-administer METH [21]. However, when administered to adult rats for 10 days prior to METH self-administration, oxytocin had no effect on reinstatement to METH-seeking behaviours unless the rats had experienced chronic stress [16]. The experience-dependent effects of chronic oxytocin indicate that the therapeutic utility of oxytocin may need to be understood in animal models exhibiting a robust addiction-like phenotype (for review see ref. [22]).

Intravenous drug self-administration procedures can be modified to induce distinct addiction phenotypes. For example, although procedures involving short daily access (ShA) to METH (~2 h /day) are widely used, this model does not necessarily induce human-like addiction traits. In contrast, long daily access (LgA) to METH (≥6 h /day) can produce incubation of cue-induced craving during protracted abstinence [23], which is also reported in human METH users [24]. Other dysfunctions reminiscent of human METH addiction are also induced by LgA, including memory impairments [25], deficient sensorimotor gating [26], dysphoria [27], and altered glutamate and dopamine neurotransmission [28, 29]. Treatment with oxytocin interacts with many of these behaviors [30,31,32] and neurotransmitter systems [12, 33, 34] disrupted by LgA that may contribute to addiction, although the effects of oxytocin treatment have not yet been studied in these translational LgA models.

The present study investigated the effects of chronic oxytocin treatment when administered during a period of protracted abstinence from ShA or LgA METH self-administration, on cue-, drug-, and yohimbine-induced relapse, as well as on anxiety-like behaviours. Sex was included as a primary variable as sex interacts with both oxytocin (e.g. ref. [35]) and METH (e.g. ref. [36]), and acute oxytocin treatment interferes with METH behaviours differently between the sexes [7].

Materials and methods

Subjects

Pregnant Sprague-Dawley dams were purchased (Animal Resources Centre, Australia), and pups were weaned at post-natal day (PND) 22. A total of 48 male and 48 freely-cycling female offspring were pair-housed by sex in open-top plastic cages (lights on at 07:00, off at 19:00). Rats had ad libitum access to chow and water. All procedures were conducted in accordance with the Australian Code of Practice for the Care and Use of Animals for Scientific Purposes (8th Edition, 2013), and the Macquarie University Animal Ethics Committee.

Drugs

Methamphetamine hydrochloride was purchased (Australian Government Analytical Laboratories, Australia), and oxytocin was synthesized by ChinaPeptides (China). Yohimbine hydrochloride was purchased from Sigma Aldrich (Australia). For intraperitoneal (IP) injection, drugs were prepared in 0.9% physiological saline (oxytocin, METH, 1 ml/kg) or distilled water (yohimbine, 2 ml/kg). For self-administration, METH was dissolved in saline at 0.1 mg/kg per 50 μl infusion. METH was prepared every 1–2 days for each sex, based on their average body weight.

Surgery

Rats (PND 47) were randomly assigned to a METH-naïve group (16/sex) or were implanted with jugular vein catheters for intravenous METH self-administration (32/sex). Surgical and post-operative procedures were performed as previously described [14], after which self-administration procedures began in early adulthood (PND 56).

Experimental procedures

Experimental groups and timeline of procedures is depicted in Fig. 1. For each test, descriptions of apparatus are included in the Supplementary Materials and Methods.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Timeline of experimental procedures. ShA Short Access to METH self-administration (2 h/day). LgA Long Access to METH self-administration (6 h/day). EPM Elevated Plus Maze. SIT Social Interaction Test. n = 8/sex/group.

Methamphetamine self-administration and extended access

Rats lever pressed for METH during daily fixed-ratio-1 sessions across 12 consecutive days (2 h/day) in operant chambers. Depression of the active lever resulted in an intravenous METH infusion, illumination of a cue light for 3-seconds, and 20-seconds without the house light, signaling a time-out period where METH was unavailable. Following the 12th self-administration session, rats were randomly allocated to either continue self-administration for 2 h (Short Access, “ShA”), or 6 h per day (Long Access, “LgA”) for 10 days. Allocated ShA and LgA groups did no differ regarding: body weight, total METH intake, or rate of acquisition (data not shown). Infusions were limited to a maximum of 60 (ShA) and 150 (LgA) per session, otherwise ShA and LgA were identical.

Treatment during forced abstinence from methamphetamine

Following the final day of self-administration, rats underwent 30 days of forced abstinence where they remained in their home cages. Rats were randomly allocated to receive oxytocin (1 mg/kg IP) or saline injections on days 6–20 of abstinence. Allocations were conducted by home cage, so that each pair received the same treatment. Treatment groups did not differ regarding total METH intake, body weight, or lever pressing on cue-extinction day 2.

Elevated plus maze

On the 25th abstinence day, rats were placed in the centre of the elevated plus maze (EPM) facing an open arm and could freely explore the apparatus (5 min). Time spent in the open arms was scored by a person blind to treatment group. For both EPM and social interaction test, rats with no METH exposure but which had received 15 days of oxytocin or saline were also assessed.

Social interaction test

On the 26th abstinence day, rats were individually habituated to the testing arena (20 mins), and then on abstinence days 27–28 they were tested for their social interaction with novel partners. Each rat separately interacted with two novel conspecifics of their same group (METH-Access; Sex; Chronic-Treatment), and body weights of pairs were within 10%. Interaction pairs were not siblings and were from nonadjacent home cages. Pairs of rats were allowed to interact for a 5-minute period. The time spent engaged in social behaviours was scored by a researcher blind to treatment condition. Measurement of social behaviour was based on [20], and included: anogenital investigation, nose-to-nose investigation, pinning, and climbing, which were scored as one aggregate variable.

Incubation of methamphetamine craving

To model incubation of METH craving, rats were returned to operant chambers on forced abstinence days 2 and 30 and underwent extinction tests in the presence of methamphetamine-associated cues (for review, see [37]). During these sessions, rats were exposed to a single illumination of the cue-light 30 seconds into the session. Thereafter, depression of the active lever illuminated the cue light for 3 seconds. The difference in active lever pressing from day 2–30 was calculated to create an “Incubation Score” [38].

Extinction of lever pressing

After the cue-extinction test on day 30, rats underwent daily 1-h sessions to extinguish lever pressing, where depression of either lever had no programmed consequences. Following 8 days of extinction, all rats met standard extinction criterion of <15 active lever presses. Rats received saline injections (IP) immediately prior to the final 2 sessions, to habituate them to reinstatement conditions.

Yohimbine- and methamphetamine-primed reinstatement

Following extinction, rats underwent yohimbine- and then METH-primed reinstatement to drug seeking. Yohimbine-induced reinstatement was achieved by IP injection with the α-2 adrenoceptor antagonist yohimbine, which induces cravings in humans [39] and reinstatement in rodents [40]. Reinstatement tests were separated by three extinction sessions, and all rats met extinction criterion prior to the next reinstatement test. All yohimbine- and METH-primed reinstatement sessions were programmed identically to extinction sessions. On the first session, rats received 0.625 mg/kg yohimbine, were returned to their home cage for 30 min, and then placed in their operant chamber for 1 h. Reinstatement session two was identical, except rats received 1.25 mg/kg yohimbine. Reinstatement sessions three and four began 5 min after rats received 0.3 or 1.0 mg/kg METH, respectively.

Statistical analysis

Self-administration and reinstatement data were analysed using a between subject’s ANOVA, including independent variables of METH-Access (ShA, LgA), Chronic-Treatment (saline, oxytocin), and Sex (male, female) for a total of eight groups (n = 8/group). Data from the social interaction test and EPM were analysed similarly, with the addition of a third level of METH-Access (“None”) for a total of 12 groups (n = 8/group). For reinstatement data, inactive lever pressing was included as a covariate, and dose of yohimbine (0.625, 1.25 mg/kg)) and METH (0.3, 1.0 mg/kg) was included as a within-subjects variable. Main effects, interactions (α = 0.05) and simple effects adjusted with Bonferroni’s test for multiple comparisons (α = 0.05/#possible contrasts) are reported. Analyses were conducted in SPSS (IBM, Version 20), and visualized in Graphpad (Prism, Version 7.04). Analyses of inactive lever pressing and locomotor data is presented in the Supplementary Results.

Results

Methamphetamine self-administration

All rats acquired METH self-administration (Fig. 2a). Extended access to METH self-administration (LgA) resulted in significantly higher life-time METH intake than ShA (F(1,58) = 274.933, p < 0.001; Fig. 2b). The binge-like intake at the start of sessions was enhanced by LgA, whereby METH intake in the first 15 and first 120 min of the session was significantly higher after 10 days of LgA training, compared with rats first LgA session (all p < 0.01; Fig. 2d). There was no significant effect of Sex on METH intake (F(1,58) = 0.092, p= 0.866). There was a significant Sex × METH-Access interaction on locomotor activity, whereby females exhibited higher locomotor counts more in the LgA condition than ShA (F(1,58) = 107.32, p < 0.001; Fig. 2c).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Acquisition and escalation of METH (0.1 mg/kg/infusion) intravenous self-administration during short access (ShA: 2 h/day) and long access (LgA: 6 h/day) in male and female rats. a Active and Inactive lever presses. b METH infusions (0.1 mg/kg) and total intake. Inset graph illustrates the difference in total METH intake between ShA and LgA rats. c Locomotor activity. d Development of binge-like METH intake in LgA trained rats (combined male and female), comparing the first and final 2 and 6 h sessions in 15-minute bins. Inset graph illustrates the comparison between the first 2 h of the labelled sessions in LgA rats. #p < 0.05. *p< 0.05 from 6 h D1. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. n = 16/sex/group.

Effect of methamphetamine self-administration and chronic oxytocin treatment on anxiety

On the EPM test, the interactions of Sex × METH-Access × Chronic-Treatment (F(1,84) = 0.220; p = 0.803), Sex × METH-Access (F(1,84) = 0.022; p = 0.978), METH-Access × Chronic-Treatment (F(1,84) = 1.470; p = 0.236), and Sex × Chronic-Treatment (F(1,84) = 0.254; p = 0.616) on time spent in the open arm were not significant. There were significant main effects of METH-Access (F(1,84) = 9.221; p < 0.001; Fig. 3a), Chronic-Treatment (F(1,84) = 5.410, p = 0.022), but not Sex (F(1,84) = 0.787; p = 0.377) on open arm time. Simple contrasts (α = 0.017) revealed that compared with METH-Naïve rats, LgA Saline rats spent significantly less time in the open arms (Males: p = 0.009; Females: p = 0.010), while ShA Saline rats were not significantly different to METH-Naïve Saline (Males: p = 0.488; Females: p = 0.240). Comparing between METH-Access groups, LgA rats spent less time in the open arms than ShA, although this was not significant after controlling for multiple comparisons (Males: p = 0.040; Females: p = 0.120). Within LgA, the oxytocin group spent more time in the open arms than saline, although this too was not significant after controlling for multiple comparisons (Males: p = 0.040; Females: 0.056).

Fig. 3
figure 3

The effect of chronic oxytocin treatment during abstinence on trait anxiety, social interaction, and incubation of cue-induced relapse, in male and female rats with no METH exposure (“None”), and in ShA and LgA trained rats. a Time spent in the open arms of the elevated plus maze. b Time spent interacting with a novel conspecific, c Difference in active lever presses between cue-relapse day 2 and day 30 (“Incubation Score”). d Inactive lever presses, and e locomotor activity on cue-induced relapse day 30. @p< 0.017 compared with respective ‘None’ group. #p< 0.017 compared with respective saline group. *p< 0.017 compared with respective ShA group. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. n = 8 per group.

Effect of methamphetamine self-administration and chronic oxytocin treatment on social interaction

On the social interaction test, there were no significant interactions of METH-Access × Sex × Chronic-Treatment (F(1,84) = 0.420; p = 0.658; Fig. 3b), METH-Access × Sex (F(1,84) = 1.752; p = 0.180), Sex × Chronic-Treatment (F(1,84) = 0.613; p = 0.436), or METH-Access × Chronic-Treatment (F(1,84) = 0.300; p = 0.742), on time spent interacting. There was a significant effect of Sex (F(1,84) = 12.749; p < 0.001), where overall, female pairs spent less time engaged in social interaction than male pairs. There was a significant effect of Chronic-Treatment (F(1,84) = 8.907; p = 0.004), whereby oxytocin treated pairs engaged in more social interaction than saline treated pairs. There was a significant effect of METH-Access on social interaction time (F(1,84) = 36.891; p < 0.001), and simple contrasts (α = 0.017) revealed that compared with METH-Naïve pairs, LgA pairs spent significantly less time interacting (Males: p < 0.001; Females: p = 0.001) while ShA pair interaction did not differ to naïve controls (Males: p = 0.516; Females: p = 0.236). LgA pairs also interacted significantly less than ShA pairs (Males: p < 0.001; Females: p = 0.011). Within LgA, oxytocin treated pairs did not differ significantly in time spent interacting than saline pairs (Males: p = 0.261; Females: p = 0.110). However, within METH-Naïve females, oxytocin treatment significantly increased social interaction time compared with saline pairs (p = 0.016).

Effects of chronic oxytocin treatment on incubation of cue-induced reinstatement

When comparing day 2 to day 30, all four LgA groups and ShA females significantly increased their active lever pressing over time (all p < 0.002; Figure S2 and Table S2), while ShA males did not (Saline: p = 0.162, Oxytocin: p = 0.060). Incubation Scores (day 30–day 2) were therefore analysed to detect differences in magnitude of incubation. There were no significant interactions of Sex × METH-Access × Chronic-Treatment (F(1,58) = 0.033; p = 0.856), Sex × METH-Access (F(1,58) = 0.182; p = 0.671), or Sex × Chronic-Treatment (F(1,58) = 0.232; p = 0.632) on incubation scores. There was a significant interaction of METH-Access × Chronic-Treatment on incubation scores (F(1,58) = 11.151; p = 0.001), whereby the inhibitory effect of oxytocin versus saline on incubation scores was greater in LgA than ShA rats. There was no significant effect of Sex on incubation scores (F(1,58) = 3.836; p = 0.055). Comparing within Saline treated rats, LgA had significantly higher incubation scores than ShA (Males: p < 0.001; Females: p < 0.001). Comparing within LgA, oxytocin treated rats had significantly lower incubation scores than saline treated rats (Males: p = 0.012; Females: p = 0.015).

Extinction

All rats extinguished their active lever pressing within 8 extinction sessions (<15 presses; Fig. S1). There was no effect of oxytocin treatment (F(1,58) = 0.555, p = 0.459) on the number of extinction sessions required to achieve extinction criterion. There was, however, a significant interaction of METH-Access × Sex (F(1,58) = 27.198; p < 0.001), whereby the difference in the number of extinction sessions required to achieve extinction criterion between ShA and LgA groups was greater in males than females. LgA males required significantly more sessions to extinguish than ShA males (p < 0.001).

Effects of chronic oxytocin treatment on yohimbine-induced reinstatement

There was a significant effect of yohimbine dose on active lever pressing (F(1,54) = 23.158, p < 0.000), so each dose was analysed in separate three-factor models below.

0.625 mg/kg yohimbine

On the 0.625 mg/kg yohimbine reinstatement test, there were no significant interactions of Sex × Chronic-Treatment × METH-Access (F(1,58) = 1.478; p = 0.229), Sex × METH-Access (F(1,58) = 2.441; p = 0.124), or METH-Access × Chronic-Treatment (F(1,58) = 0.027; p = 0.869) on active lever presses, while adjusting for inactive lever presses. However, there was a significant Sex × Chronic-Treatment interaction (F(1,58) = 9.853; p = 0.003), as the difference between chronic oxytocin and saline treatment on active lever pressing was greater in females than males, regardless of METH Access. There was also a significant effect of METH-Access on active lever pressing, whereby LgA rats had higher active lever pressing than ShA rats (F(1,58) = 47.859; p < 0.001; Fig. 4a). There was no significant main effect of Sex (F(1,58) = 0.056; p = 0.813) or Chronic-Treatment (F(1,58) = 0.995; p = 0.323) on active lever pressing. Simple contrasts (α < 0.017) revealed that within Saline treated rats, LgA resulted in significantly higher active lever pressing than ShA (Males: p = 0.003, Females: p = 0.004). Within LgA rats, oxytocin did not significantly reduce active lever pressing compared to chronic saline treatment (Males: p = 0.226, Females: p = 0.062), whereas within ShA rats, oxytocin treatment significantly reduced active lever pressing in females (p < 0.001) but not males (p = 0.990). Comparisons with baseline extinction data are included in the figure legends, and in Table S1.

Fig. 4
figure 4

The effect of chronic oxytocin treatment during abstinence on 0.625 mg/kg (ac) and 1.25 mg/kg (df) yohimbine-primed reinstatement to METH-seeking behaviour in ShA and LgA trained male and female rats. a, d Active lever presses. b, e Inactive lever presses. c, f Locomotor activity. Overlaid graphs depict data from the respective extinction day prior to each test. *p< 0.017 compared with respective ShA group. #p< 0.017 compared with respective saline group. ^p< 0.017 compared with extinction day prior to test. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. n = 8/group.

1.25 mg/kg yohimbine

On the 1.25 mg/kg yohimbine-induced reinstatement test, there were no significant interactions of Sex × METH-Access × Chronic Treatment (F(1,58) = 0.112; p = 0.739) or METH-Access × Chronic Treatment (F(1,58) = 0.370; p = 0.545) on active lever pressing, when adjusting for inactive lever pressing. Importantly, there were significant interactions of Sex × METH-Access (F(1,58) = 12.343; p = 0.001), as LgA induced higher active lever pressing compared to ShA more so in females than males; and Sex × Chronic Treatment (F(1,58) = 8.782; p = 0.004), whereby oxytocin reduced active lever pressing compared to saline treatment to a greater extent in females than males. Simple comparisons reveal that within Saline treated rats, LgA significantly increased active lever pressing (Males: p = 0.004, Females: p < 0.001). Within LgA rats, oxytocin treatment significantly reduced active lever pressing compared with saline treatment in females (p = 0.007) but not males (p = 0.159). Within ShA rats, oxytocin similarly reduced active lever pressing in females (p = 0.002) but not males (p = 0.489).

Effects of chronic oxytocin treatment on methamphetamine-primed reinstatement

There was a significant effect of METH dose on active lever pressing (F(1,54) = 71.963, p < 0.000), so each dose was analysed in separate three-factor models.

0.3 mg/kg methamphetamine

On the 0.3 mg/kg METH-primed reinstatement test, there were no significant interactions of Sex × Chronic-Treatment × METH-Access (F(1,58) = 0.084; p = 0.772), Sex × METH-Access (F(1,58) = 0.341; p = 0.562), Sex × Chronic-Treatment (F(1,58) = 0.797; p = 0.376), or METH-Access × Chronic-Treatment (F(1,58) = 1.029; p = 0.315), on active lever pressing while adjusting for inactive lever pressing. There was, however, a significant effect of METH-Access on active lever pressing (F(1,58) = 13.296, p = 0.001; Fig. 5a), whereby LgA rats demonstrated significantly higher active lever pressing than ShA rats. There was no effect of Sex (F(1,58) = 0.173; p = 0.680) or Chronic-Treatment (F(1,58) = 1.479; p = 0.229). Simple contrasts within Saline treated rats found that LgA resulted in significantly higher active lever pressing for females (p = 0.050) but not males (p = 0.077). Within LgA rats, oxytocin compared with saline treatment did not significantly affect active lever pressing (Males: p = 0.398, Females: p = 0.255).

Fig. 5
figure 5

The effect of chronic oxytocin treatment during abstinence on 0.3 mg/kg (ac) and 1.0 mg/kg (df) METH-primed reinstatement to METH-seeking behaviour in ShA and LgA trained male and female rats. a, d Active lever presses. b, e Inactive lever presses. c, f Locomotor activity. METH was administered IP immediately prior to initiation of the reinstatement session. Overlaid graphs depict data from the respective extinction day prior to each test. *p< 0.05 compared with respective ShA group. #p< 0.05 compared with respective saline group. ^p< 0.05 compared with extinction day prior to test. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. n = 8/group.

1 mg/kg methamphetamine

On the 1 mg/kg METH-primed reinstatement test, there were no significant interactions of Sex × METH-Access × Chronic-Treatment (F(1,58) = 0.482; p = 0.490), Sex × METH-Access (F(1,58) = 0.227; p = 0.636), Sex × Chronic-Treatment (F(1,58) = 0.449; p = 0.506) on active lever pressing when adjusting for inactive lever pressing. There was a significant METH-Access × Chronic-Treatment interaction (F(1,58) = 9.011; p = 0.004), whereby the difference between oxytocin and saline groups on active lever pressing was significantly greater for LgA than ShA rats. There was no effect of Sex (F(1,58) = 0.108; p = 0.744). Simple comparisons within Saline treated rats found that LgA significantly increased active lever pressing compared to ShA (Males: p < 0.001, Females: p = 0.005). Within LgA rats, oxytocin significantly reduced active lever pressing compared to saline (Males: p = 0.008, Females: p = 0.010). Within ShA rats, oxytocin did not significantly affect active lever pressing (Males: p = 0.075, Females: p = 0.075).

Discussion

Our study investigated the effects of chronic oxytocin treatment during abstinence from METH self-administration. This data indicate that 15 days of oxytocin treatment during a 30-day abstinence period is sufficient to suppress METH relapse, and to subtly improve anxiety-like behaviours. Importantly, these findings were largely consistent between sexes, and primarily evident in rats which had extended access to METH self-administration.

Extended access to methamphetamine induced a high-addiction and high-anxiety phenotype in both sexes

The extended access procedure resulted in binge-like patterns of METH intake in LgA but not ShA rats. Bingeing is common in early stages of addiction in humans [41] and has been shown to predict several addiction-like behaviours in rodents [42]. Female LgA rats also exhibited substantially higher locomotor hyperactivity during self-administration than LgA males despite similar METH intake, which may parallel the higher rates of psychosis in METH-dependent females than males [43]. Importantly, all LgA groups exhibited incubation of cue-induced relapse, and reinstated to METH more than ShA rats, while yohimbine-induced reinstatement was only elevated by LgA in females. This is consistent with previous demonstrations of enhanced METH-primed reinstatement in LgA compared to ShA rats [44, 45], and clinical observations of higher stress-related psychopathology in female psychostimulant users compared with males [46, 47]. Interestingly, ShA produced a minor but significant incubation effect in females but not males, which has not previously been shown. Otherwise, the effects of LgA on escalated METH self-administration, incubation, and METH-primed reinstatement were similar between sexes, which largely mirrors previous findings [48].

Additionally, LgA increased trait anxiety and reduced social interaction time, while ShA rats did not differ from METH-naïve controls. This is in keeping with previous reports of elevated anxiety-like behaviour on the marble burying test in LgA compared to ShA METH rats [27] and reduced social interaction time following non-contingent METH exposure [49]. Given that LgA rats do not exhibit deficits in social motivation [50], this effect of LgA on social interaction may reflect a heightened anxiety state, like what was measured with the EPM. Overall, this pattern of data parallels the human literature indicating high levels of anxiety in METH-dependent individuals [2, 3] and supports the use of extended access procedures in both sexes to induce addiction-like phenotypes with translational validity.

Chronic oxytocin treatment during abstinence reduced relapse, reinstatement, and anxiety in extended access rats

Chronic treatment with oxytocin during abstinence from METH remediated multiple addiction-like behaviours. Firstly, oxytocin attenuated the incubation of cue-induced relapse. Incubation of METH craving after protracted abstinence critically involves activity in the central amygdala (CeA; [51]), a major recipient of hypothalamic oxytocin which inhibits CeA output [52]. As administered oxytocin stimulates endogenous oxytocin activity [53], then chronic activation of these amygdala projecting axons by IP oxytocin may have prevented the heightened CeA activity hypothesised to underpin incubation of METH craving. Interactions of oxytocin and LgA at the CeA may therefore be a fruitful pursuit.

Secondly, chronic oxytocin treatment also reduced METH-primed reinstatement in LgA but not ShA rats. Psychostimulant-primed reinstatement is driven by impaired glutamate homeostasis in fronto-striatal circuits, which is augmented by LgA [54]. Interestingly, oxytocin treatment increases expression of glutamate transporter 1 [33], which is responsible for the majority of glutamate reuptake in addiction circuits [55], and restoration of which inhibits psychostimulant-seeking more in LgA than ShA rats [56]. As such, it may be possible that oxytocin treatment worked to restore LgA-disrupted glutamate homeostasis.

Lastly, yohimbine-primed reinstatement was also attenuated by chronic oxytocin treatment, but only in females. This effect was present in both ShA and LgA females, but only LgA males, although this may be due to a floor effect on ShA males responding to yohimbine, especially at the lower dose. This is the most overt sex difference discovered in the present study and may be related to interactions between oxytocin, sex hormones, and stress. For example, yohimbine-primed reinstatement can be reduced in female but not male rats by pretreatment with allopregnanolone [57], which modulates endogenous oxytocin release [58]. Oxytocin also interacts with stress differently between sexes. For example, social defeat stress increases markers of endogenous oxytocin function in female but not male mice, while oxytocin treatment reversed behavioural responses to stress in males but not females [59]. These data suggest links between stress, oxytocin, and relapse; however, recent findings demonstrate that food-seeking induced by yohimbine requires the presence of contingent cues [60]. This indicates that yohimbine may induce reinstatement through mechanisms distinct from stress, or that stress reinstates drug-seeking through augmenting the valence of cues. Given that yohimbine and foot-shock induce nicotine reinstatement through convergent neural mechanisms [61], the latter explanation may be likely. Considering this, our data may suggest that females are more susceptible to this effect on cues (e.g. ref. [38]), and that oxytocin treatment may have modulated this elevated cue-salience/valence. Such an effect of oxytocin has been hypothesised by others [62], whereby oxytocin is thought to enhance the salience of social stimuli, while dampening the salience of drug-related stimuli.

Implications for using oxytocin as an addiction therapy

Across all relapse measures, chronic oxytocin treatment had a greater effect in LgA than ShA rats. This was somewhat the case for anxiety and social behaviour as well, where chronic oxytocin decreased anxiety in LgA males and females, but not in ShA or controls. These findings align with multiple studies demonstrating efficacy of oxytocin only in rodents, which exhibit dysregulated behaviour. For example, rats which have undergone a model of post-traumatic stress disorder exhibit augmented contextual fear, which is ameliorated by chronic oxytocin treatment [63]. However, non-stressed rats received minimal benefit from oxytocin, suggesting specific interference with the modelled stress pathology. Furthermore, although chronic oxytocin treatment (15 days, icv) prevented the emergence of a high-anxiety phenotype induced by chronic psychosocial stress in mice, this same chronic treatment produced a high-anxiety phenotype in non-stressed mice [64]. Clearly, the effects of oxytocin treatment on socio-emotional behaviours depend upon the animal’s prior history.

We hypothesise that this extends to addiction-like behaviours, as demonstrated by the differential effects of oxytocin in LgA and ShA rats shown here. One explanation for this is that METH dysregulates the endogenous oxytocin system [65, 66]. As it has been proposed that the status of the oxytocin system may confer addiction vulnerability or susceptibility and may impact the efficacy of exogenous oxytocin [22, 67, 68], then the efficacy of oxytocin in LgA but not ShA rats may be due to a greater LgA-induced disruption to the endogenous oxytocin system. Another possibility is that oxytocin may normalise systems disrupted by the addiction process, which are common across all drugs of abuse, rather than specific to METH. For example, acute oxytocin treatment suppresses escalated alcohol consumption and motivation in alcohol-dependent but not non-dependent rats, likely through modulating the CeA [69], which is also implicated in incubated METH-craving [51]. Overall, the superior therapeutic effects of oxytocin in LgA rats is particularly encouraging from a translational perspective, as LgA may better model human drug addiction (although see ref. [70])

It is largely unknown to what degree the effects of IP oxytocin administration on addiction-like behaviours are mediated by action in the periphery, which is rich in oxytocin receptors [71], or in the brain, which it is thought to poorly penetrate. Recent findings from studies using oxytocin-null mice indicate that IP oxytocin reaches the amygdala and hippocampus within 30 min post administration [72], and is transported into the brain by receptors for advanced glycation end-products on the blood-brain barrier [73]. Additionally, there is compelling evidence that IP oxytocin modulates feeding behaviour and oxytocin neuron activity through an ascending vagal-dependent pathway [74], and we have unpublished data indicating that oxytocin inhibits METH self-administration via the vagus nerve. With this progress in understanding the route by which IP oxytocin modulates the brain, the present findings may be interpreted with greater confidence in their potential for clinical translation.

Limitations and conclusions

Several limitations of this study should be considered. Firstly, oxytocin or saline was administered to pairs of rats in their home cages. As acute treatment with oxytocin induces profound social effects [75], and social bonds protect against METH self-administration [76], it is possible that the relapse-suppressant effects of oxytocin discovered here were due to resulting differences in social bonds between the oxytocin and saline treated rats. However, as oxytocin is often used as an adjunct to psychosocial therapies (e.g. ref. [77]), such an effect may be clinically beneficial. Conversely, chronic oxytocin treatment may adversely alter the endogenous oxytocin system [78] and may therefore impair behaviour or cognition. However, 21 days of oxytocin (1 mg/kg IP) has shown improvement in probabilistic reversal learning without impacting effortful motivation in male rats [79], suggesting that our data are not due to impaired cognition or motivation. Lastly, estrus cycle is a potent mediator of cocaine-cue learning [38], and incubation of cocaine craving [80], indicating the importance of including estrus cycle as a variable, which we did not do. Although estrus cycle does not moderate the inhibitory effects of oxytocin on METH-primed reinstatement [7], cycle may interact with oxytocin during cue- or yohimbine-induced relapse. Understanding the sex dependent effects of oxytocin is vital for clinical translation and requires further investigation.

Overall, our findings support a relapse-prevention strategy of administering oxytocin during abstinence from METH, for both males and females. Oxytocin may also be a promising treatment for the psychosocial symptoms often comorbid with METH-use disorders. While the mechanisms by which peripherally administered oxytocin modulates addiction processes in the brain require further elucidation, this study convincingly demonstrates through the use of a translatable animal model, the clinical utility of oxytocin for treating METH-use disorders.

Funding and disclosure

The project was funded by the Macquarie University Department of Psychology. NE was funded by a Research Training Program scholarship from the Australian Government. The authors have no financial interests relating to the work described and declare no conflict of interest.