Article | Published:

Neural predictors of treatment response to brain stimulation and psychological therapy in depression: a double-blind randomized controlled trial

Abstract

Standard depression treatments, including antidepressant medication and cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT), are ineffective for many patients. Prefrontal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been proposed as an alternative treatment, but has shown inconsistent efficacy for depression, and its mechanisms are poorly understood. We recruited unmedicated patients with major depressive disorder (N = 71 approached; N = 39 randomised) for a mechanistic, double-blind, randomized controlled trial consisting of eight weekly sessions of prefrontal tDCS administered to the left prefrontal cortex prior to CBT. We probed (1) whether tDCS improved the efficacy of CBT relative to sham stimulation; and (2) whether neural measures predicted clinical response. We found a modest and non-significant effect of tDCS on clinical outcome over and above CBT (active: 50%; sham: 31.6%; odds ratio: 2.16, 95% CI = 0.59–7.99), but a strong relationship, predicted a priori, between baseline activation during a working memory task in the stimulated prefrontal region and symptom improvement. Repeating our analyses of symptom outcome splitting the sample according to this biomarker revealed that tDCS was significantly superior to sham in individuals with high left prefrontal cortex activation at baseline; we also show 86% accuracy in predicting clinical response using this measure. Exploratory analyses revealed several other regions where activation at baseline was associated with subsequent response to CBT, irrespective of tDCS. This mechanistic trial revealed variable, but predictable, clinical effects of prefrontal tDCS combined with CBT for depression. We have discovered a potential explanation for this variability: individual differences in baseline activation of the region stimulated. Such a biomarker could potentially be used to pre-select patients for trials and, eventually, in the clinic.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Data availability

All data discussed in the paper will be made available to any reader who enters into a managed access arrangement. Ethical and data governance restrictions prevent the data from being shared in a public repository (all data are patient data collected under UK National Health Service ethics and patients did not give consent for open sharing). All data will be shared freely following a formal Data Sharing Agreement with University College London. Researchers who wish to access the data should contact the senior author (j.roiser@ucl.ac.uk).

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Trial Registration: The trial was registered at clinicatrials.gov, registration number NCT01875419; URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01875419?term=NCT01875419&rank=1

References

  1. 1.

    Kendall PC, Hollon SD. Cognitive-behavioral interventions: theory, research, and procedures. vol. 21. New York, NY: Academic Press; 2013.

  2. 2.

    DeRubeis RJ, Hollon SD, Amsterdam JD, Shelton RC, Young PR, Salomon RM, et al. Cognitive therapy vs medications in the treatment of moderate to severe depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005;62:409–16.

  3. 3.

    Frye MA, Grunze H, Suppes T, McElroy SL, Keck PE Jr, Walden J, et al. A placebo-controlled evaluation of adjunctive modafinil in the treatment of bipolar depression. Am J Psychiatry. 2007;164:1242–9.

  4. 4.

    Vedeniapin A, Cheng L, George MS. Feasibility of simultaneous cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and left prefrontal rTMS for treatment resistant depression. Brain Stimul. 2010;3:207.

  5. 5.

    D’Urso G, Mantovani A, Micillo M, Priori A, Muscettola G. Transcranial direct current stimulation and cognitive-behavioral therapy: evidence of a synergistic effect in treatment-resistant depression. Brain Stimul. 2013;6:465–7.

  6. 6.

    Wang X-L, Du M-Y, Chen T-L, Chen Z-Q, Huang X-Q, Luo Y, et al. Neural correlates during working memory processing in major depressive disorder. Prog NeuroPsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2015;56:101–8.

  7. 7.

    Hooley JM, Gruber SA, Scott LA, Hiller JB, Yurgelun-Todd DA. Activation in dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in response to maternal criticism and praise in recovered depressed and healthy control participants. Biol Psychiatry. 2005;57:809–12.

  8. 8.

    Kerestes R, Ladouceur C, Meda S, Nathan P, Blumberg H, Maloney K, et al. Abnormal prefrontal activity subserving attentional control of emotion in remitted depressed patients during a working memory task with emotional distracters. Psychol Med. 2012;42:29–40.

  9. 9.

    Stagg CJ, Lin RL, Mezue M, Segerdahl A, Kong Y, Xie J, et al. Widespread modulation of cerebral perfusion induced during and after transcranial direct current stimulation applied to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. J Neurosci. 2013;33:11425–31.

  10. 10.

    Nord CL, Lally N, Charpentier CJ. Harnessing electric potential: DLPFC tDCS induces widespread brain perfusion changes. Front Syst Neurosci. 2013;7:99.

  11. 11.

    Boggio PS, Rigonatti SP, Ribeiro RB, Myczkowski ML, Nitsche MA, Pascual-Leone A, et al. A randomized, double-blind clinical trial on the efficacy of cortical direct current stimulation for the treatment of major depression. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2008;11:249–54.

  12. 12.

    Brunoni A, Valiengo L, Baccaro A, Zanao TA, de Oliveira JF, Goulart A, et al. The sertraline vs electrical current therapy for treating depression clinical study: results from a factorial, randomized, controlled trial. JAMA Psychiatry. 2013;70:383–91.

  13. 13.

    Fregni F, Boggio PS, Nitsche MA, Marcolin MA, Rigonatti SP, Pascual‐Leone A. Treatment of major depression with transcranial direct current stimulation. Bipolar Disord. 2006;8:203–4.

  14. 14.

    Loo CK, Alonzo A, Martin D, Mitchell PB, Galvez V, Sachdev P. Transcranial direct current stimulation for depression: 3-week, randomised, sham-controlled trial. Br J Psychiatry. 2012;200:52–9.

  15. 15.

    Nord CL, Roiser J. Non-invasive direct current brain stimulation: the evidence behind the hype. Adv Clin Neurosci Rehabil. 2015;15:9–11.

  16. 16.

    Shiozawa P, Fregni F, Benseñor IM, Lotufo PA, Berlim MT, Daskalakis JZ, et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation for major depression: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Int. J. Neuropsychopharmacol. 2014;17:1443–52.

  17. 17.

    Loo CK, Husain MM, McDonald WM, Aaronson S, O’Reardon JP, Alonzo A, et al. International randomized-controlled trial of transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in depression. Brain Stimul. 2018;11:125–33.

  18. 18.

    Dockery CA, Hueckel-Weng R, Birbaumer N, Plewnia C. Enhancement of planning ability by transcranial direct current stimulation. J Neurosci. 2009;29:7271–7.

  19. 19.

    Metuki N, Sela T, Lavidor M. Enhancing cognitive control components of insight problems solving by anodal tDCS of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Brain Stimul. 2012;5:110–5.

  20. 20.

    Fregni F, Boggio PS, Nitsche M, Bermpohl F, Antal A, Feredoes E, et al. Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of prefrontal cortex enhances working memory. Exp Brain Res. 2005;166:23–30.

  21. 21.

    Lally N, Nord CL, Walsh V, Roiser JP. Does excitatory fronto-extracerebral tDCS lead to improved working memory performance? F1000Res. 2013;2:219.

  22. 22.

    Oliveira JF, Zanao TA, Valiengo L, Lotufo PA, Bensenor IM, Fregni F, et al. Acute working memory improvement after tDCS in antidepressant-free patients with major depressive disorder. Neurosci Lett. 2013;537:60–64.

  23. 23.

    Horvath JC, Forte JD, Carter O. Quantitative review finds no evidence of cognitive effects in healthy populations from single-session transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Brain Stimul. 2015;8:535–50.

  24. 24.

    Tremblay S, Lepage J-F, Latulipe-Loiselle A, Fregni F, Pascual-Leone A, Théoret H. The uncertain outcome of prefrontal tDCS. Brain Stimul. 2014;7:773–83.

  25. 25.

    Price AR, Hamilton RH. A Re-evaluation of the cognitive effects from single-session transcranial direct current stimulation. Brain Stimul. 2015;8:663–5.

  26. 26.

    Segrave R, Arnold S, Hoy K, Fitzgerald P. Concurrent cognitive control training augments the antidepressant efficacy of tDCS: a pilot study. Brain Stimul. 2014;7:325–31.

  27. 27.

    Welch ES, Weigand A, Hooker JE, Philip NS, Tyrka AR, Press DZ, et al. Feasibility of computerized cognitive‐behavioral therapy combined with bifrontal transcranial direct current stimulation for treatment of major depression. Neuromodulation. 2018. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/ner.12807.

  28. 28.

    Dunlop BW, Mayberg HS. Neuroimaging-based biomarkers for treatment selection in major depressive disorder. Dialog Clin Neurosci. 2014;16:479.

  29. 29.

    Roiser JP, Elliott R, Sahakian BJ. Cognitive mechanisms of treatment in depression. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2012;37:117–36.

  30. 30.

    Weiduschat N, Dubin MJ. Prefrontal cortical blood flow predicts response of depression to rTMS. J Affect Disord. 2013;150:699–702.

  31. 31.

    Nitsche MA, Paulus W. Sustained excitability elevations induced by transcranial DC motor cortex stimulation in humans. Neurology. 2001;57:1899–901.

  32. 32.

    O’Nions EJ, Dolan RJ, Roiser JP. Serotonin transporter genotype modulates subgenual response to fearful faces using an incidental task. J Cogn Neurosci. 2011;23:3681–93.

  33. 33.

    Laakso I, Tanaka S, Mikkonen M, Koyama S, Sadato N, Hirata A. Electric fields of motor and frontal tDCS in a standard brain space: a computer simulation study. Neuroimage. 2016;137:140–51.

  34. 34.

    Martin DM, Alonzo A, Mitchell PB, Sachdev P, Gálvez V, Loo CK. Fronto-extracephalic transcranial direct current stimulation as a treatment for major depression: an open-label pilot study. J Affect Disord. 2011;134:459–63.

  35. 35.

    Parkin BL, Bhandari M, Glen JC, Walsh V. The physiological effects of Transcranial Electrical Stimulation do not apply to parameters commonly used in studies of Cognitive Neuromodulation. Neuropsychologia. 2018. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0028393218301234.

  36. 36.

    Ambrus GG, Al-Moyed H, Chaieb L, Sarp L, Antal A, Paulus W. The fade-in–short stimulation–fade out approach to sham tDCS–reliable at 1 mA for naive and experienced subjects, but not investigators. Brain Stimul. 2012;5:499–504.

  37. 37.

    Hollon SD, Stewart MO, Strunk D. Enduring effects for cognitive behavior therapy in the treatment of depression and anxiety. Annu Rev Psychol. 2006;57:285–315.

  38. 38.

    Brunoni AR, Amadera J, Berbel B, Volz MS, Rizzerio BG, Fregni F. A systematic review on reporting and assessment of adverse effects associated with transcranial direct current stimulation. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2011;14:1133–45.

  39. 39.

    Siegle GJ, Thompson W, Carter CS, Steinhauer SR, Thase ME. Increased amygdala and decreased dorsolateral prefrontal BOLD responses in unipolar depression: related and independent features. Biol Psychiatry. 2007;61:198–209.

  40. 40.

    Owen AM, McMillan KM, Laird AR, Bullmore E. N‐back working memory paradigm: a meta‐analysis of normative functional neuroimaging studies. Hum Brain Mapp. 2005;25:46–59.

  41. 41.

    Nord CL, Gray A, Charpentier C, Robinson O, Roiser J Unreliability of putative fMRI biomarkers during emotional face processing. Neuroimage. 2017;156:119–27.

  42. 42.

    Siegle GJ, Carter CS, Thase ME. Use of FMRI to predict recovery from unipolar depression with cognitive behavior therapy. Am J Psychiatry. 2006;163:735–38.

  43. 43.

    Nord CL, Forster S, Halahakoon DC, Penton-Voak IS, Munafò MR, Roiser JP. Prefrontal cortex stimulation does not affect emotional bias, but may slow emotion identification. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2017;12:839–47.

  44. 44.

    Brunoni AR, Moffa AH, Sampaoi-Junior B, Borrione L, Moreno ML, Fernandes RA, et al. Trial of electrical direct-current therapy versus escitalopram for depression. N Engl J Med. 2017;376:2523–33.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank research assistants Jessica Alylward and Alan Gray for their help with data collection. They are also extremely grateful to the NHS clinicians Michaela Thomas, Dr Chinea Eziefula, Carlo Gittens, Laura Franklin, Dr Karen Katz, Dr Robin Weedon, Dr Jeremy Handel, Dr Flavia Cigolla, Akbar Jamil, Dr Isabella Foustanos, Dr Abi Harris, Dr Sukhvinder Virdee, Dr Jessica Wilner-Reid, and Dr Joshua Buckman, as well as all the patients who generously volunteered their time for the trial.

Author information

CLN, JPR, NL, SP, VV, and CC designed the study, CLN, CH, TL, and JL collected data, CLN analysed data, CLN and JPR wrote the paper with contributions from all the other authors.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Correspondence to Camilla L. Nord.

Supplementary information

Supplemental Material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark
Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4