Article | Published:

Cues play a critical role in estrous cycle-dependent enhancement of cocaine reinforcement


While preclinical work has aimed to outline the neural mechanisms of drug addiction, it has overwhelmingly focused on male subjects. There has been a push in recent years to incorporate females into existing addiction models; however, males and females often have different behavioral strategies, making it important to not only include females, but to develop models that assess the factors that comprise female drug addiction. Traditional self-administration models often include light or tone cues that serve as discriminative stimuli and/or consequent stimuli, making it nearly impossible to disentangle the effects of cue learning, the cues themselves, and acute effects of psychostimulant drugs. To disentangle the interaction between drug-associated cues and the consummatory and appetitive responding driven by cocaine, we have developed a new behavioral procedure that combines Pavlovian-instrumental transfer with behavioral economic analysis. This task can be completed within a single session, allowing for studies looking at estrous cycle stage-dependent effects in intact cycling females, something that has been difficult in the past. In this study, we found no differences in self-administration across the estrous cycle in the absence of cues; however, when cues were introduced, the cues that acquired value during estrus—but not during diestrus or in males—increased motivation. Cues paired during estrus also increased c-fos expression to a greater extent in striatal regions, an effect that may underlie the observed increases in seeking induced by these cues, even weeks later. Together, these data suggest that fundamental differences in the motivational properties of psychostimulant drugs between males and females are complex and are driven primarily by the interaction between drug-associated stimuli and drug effects.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.


  1. 1.

    Tuchman E. Women and addiction: The importance of gender issues in substance abuse research. J Addict Dis. 2010;29:127–38.

  2. 2.

    Becker JB, Hu M. Sex differences in drug abuse. Front Neuroendocrinol. 2008;29:36–47.

  3. 3.

    Chen K, Kandel D. Relationship between extent of cocaine use and dependence among adolescents and adults in the United States. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2002;68:65–85.

  4. 4.

    Randall CL, Roberts JS, Del Boca FK, Carroll KM, Connors GJ, Mattson ME. Telescoping of landmark events associated with drinking: a gender comparison. J Stud Alcohol. 1999;60:252–60.

  5. 5.

    Robbins SJ, Ehrman RN, Childress AR, O’Brien CP. Comparing levels of cocaine cue reactivity in male and female outpatients. Drug Alcohol Depend. 1999;53:223–30.

  6. 6.

    Jackson LR, Robinson TE, Becker JB. Sex differences and hormonal influences on acquisition of cocaine self-administration in rats. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2006;31:129–38.

  7. 7.

    Kerstetter KA, Aguilar VR, Parrish AB, Kippin TE. Protracted time-dependent increases in cocaine-seeking behavior during cocaine withdrawal in female relative to male rats. Psychopharmacol (Berl). 2008;198:63–75.

  8. 8.

    Lynch WJ, Roth ME, Carroll ME. Biological basis of sex differences in drug abuse: Preclinical and clinical studies. Psychopharmacol (Berl). 2002;164:121–37.

  9. 9.

    Lynch WJ, Arizzi MN, Carroll ME. Effects of sex and the estrous cycle on regulation of intravenously self-administered cocaine in rats. Psychopharmacol (Berl). 2000;152:132–9.

  10. 10.

    Lynch WJ, Carroll ME. Sex differences in the acquisition of intravenously self-administered cocaine and heroin in rats. Psychopharmacol (Berl). 1999;144:77–82.

  11. 11.

    Perry AN, Westenbroek C, Becker JB. The development of a preference for cocaine over food identifies individual rats with addiction-like behaviors. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e79465.

  12. 12.

    Roberts DCS, Bennett SAL, Vickers GJ. The estrous cycle affects cocaine self-administration on a progressive ratio schedule in rats. Psychopharmacol (Berl). 1989;98:408–11.

  13. 13.

    Roth ME, Carroll ME. Sex differences in the escalation of intravenous cocaine intake following long- or short-access to cocaine self-administration. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2004;78:199–207.

  14. 14.

    Anker JJ, Carroll ME. Females are more vulnerable to drug abuse than males: Evidence from preclinical studies and the role of ovarian hormones. Curr Top Behav Neurosci. 2010;8:73–96.

  15. 15.

    Becker JB, Koob GF. Sex Differences in Animal Models: Focus on Addiction. Pharmacol Rev. 2016;68:242–63.

  16. 16.

    Hu M, Crombag HS, Robinson TE, Becker JB. Biological basis of sex differences in the propensity to self-administer cocaine. Neuropsychopharmacology . 2004;29:81–85.

  17. 17.

    Dews P. Modification by Drugs of Performance on Simple Schedules of Positive Reinforcement. 1956. 1956.

  18. 18.

    Miczek KA, Grossman SP. Positive conditioned suppression: Effects of CS duration. J Exp Anal Behav. 1971;15:243–7.

  19. 19.

    Pickens R, Thompson T. Cocaine-reinforced behavior in rats: Effects of reinforcement magnitude and fixed-ratio size. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1968;161:122–9.

  20. 20.

    Schuster CR, Thompson T. Self administration of and behavioral dependence on drugs. Annu Rev Pharmacol. 1969;9:483–502.

  21. 21.

    Tornatzky W, Miczek KA. Cocaine self-administration ‘binges’: Transition from behavioral and autonomic regulation toward homeostatic dysregulation in rats. Psychopharmacol (Berl). 2000;148:289–98.

  22. 22.

    Becker JB. Sex differences in addiction. Dialog- Clin Neurosci. 2016;18:395–402.

  23. 23.

    Evans SM, Haney M, Foltin RW. The effects of smoked cocaine during the follicular and luteal phases of the menstrual cycle in women. Psychopharmacol (Berl). 2002;159:397–406.

  24. 24.

    Evans SM, Foltin RW. Does the response to cocaine differ as a function of sex or hormonal status in human and non-human primates? Horm Behav. 2010;58:13–21.

  25. 25.

    Hecht GS, Spear NE, Spear LP. Changes in Progressive Ratio Responding for Intravenous Cocaine throughout the Reproductive Process in. 1999.

  26. 26.

    Calipari ES, Juarez B, Morel C, Walker DM, Cahill ME, Ribeiro E, et al. Dopaminergic dynamics underlying sex-specific cocaine reward. Nat Commun. 2017;8:1–15.

  27. 27.

    Cartoni E, Balleine B, Baldassarre G. Appetitive pavlovian-instrumental transfer: a review. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2016;71:829–48.

  28. 28.

    Lamb RJ, Schindler CW, Pinkston JW. Conditioned stimuli’s role in relapse: preclinical research on Pavlovian-Instrumental-Transfer. Psychopharmacol (Berl). 2016;233:1933–44.

  29. 29.

    Calipari ES, Ferris MJ, Jones SR. Extended access of cocaine self-administration results in tolerance to the dopamine-elevating and locomotor-stimulating effects of cocaine. J Neurochem. 2014;128:224–32.

  30. 30.

    Calipari ES, Godino A, Peck EG, Salery M, Mervosh NL, Landry JA, et al. Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor controls neural and behavioral plasticity in response to cocaine. Nat Commun. 2018;9:9.

  31. 31.

    Caligioni CS. Assessing reproductive status/stages in mice. Curr Protoc Neurosci. 2009;Appendix 4:Appendix4I.

  32. 32.

    Oleson EB, Roberts DCS. Behavioral economic assessment of price and cocaine consumption following self-administration histories that produce escalation of either final ratios or intake. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2009;34:796–804.

  33. 33.

    Siciliano CA, Jones SR. Cocaine potency at the dopamine transporter tracks discrete motivational states during cocaine self-administration. Neuropsychopharmacology . 2017;42:1893–904.

  34. 34.

    Oleson EB, Richardson JM, Roberts DCS. A novel IV cocaine self-administration procedure in rats: differential effects of dopamine, serotonin, and GABA drug pre-treatments on cocaine consumption and maximal price paid. Psychopharmacol (Berl). 2011;214:567–77.

  35. 35.

    Oleson EB, Roberts DCS. Cocaine Self-Administration in Rats: Threshold Procedures. Methods Mol Biol. 2012;829:303–19.

  36. 36.

    Christensen CJ, Silberberg A, Hursh SR, Roma PG, Riley AL. Demand for cocaine and food over time. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2008;91:209–16.

  37. 37.

    Hursh SR, Silberberg A. Economic demand and essential value. Psychol Rev. 2008;115:186–98.

  38. 38.

    Hursh SR, Winger G. Normalized demand for drugs and other reinforcers. J Exp Anal Behav. 1995;64:373–84.

  39. 39.

    Grimm JW, Hope BT, Wise RA, Shaham Y. Neuroadaptation. Incubation cocaine craving withdrawal Nat. 2001;412:141–2.

  40. 40.

    LeBlanc KH, Ostlund SB, Maidment NT. Pavlovian-to-instrumental transfer in cocaine seeking rats. Behav Neurosci. 2012;126:681–9.

  41. 41.

    Ciccocioppo R, Sanna PP, Weiss F. Cocaine-predictive stimulus induces drug-seeking behavior and neural activation in limbic brain regions after multiple months of abstinence: reversal by D(1) antagonists. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001;98:1976–81.

  42. 42.

    Kalivas PW, McFarland K. Brain circuitry and the reinstatement of cocaine-seeking behavior. Psychopharmacol (Berl). 2003;168:44–56.

  43. 43.

    LaLumiere RT, Smith KC, Kalivas PW. Neural circuit competition in cocaine-seeking: roles of the infralimbic cortex and nucleus accumbens shell. Eur J Neurosci. 2012;35:614–22.

  44. 44.

    Lacy RT, Strickland JC, Feinstein MA, Robinson AM, Smith MA. The effects of sex, estrous cycle, and social contact on cocaine and heroin self-administration in rats. Psychopharmacol (Berl). 2016;233:3201–10.

  45. 45.

    Richardson NR, Roberts DCS. Progressive ratio schedules in drug self-administration studies in rats: a method to evaluate reinforcing efficacy. J Neurosci Methods. 1996;66:1–11.

  46. 46.

    Bickel WK, Green L, Vuchinich RE. Behavioral economics. J Exp Anal Behav. 1995;64:257–62.

  47. 47.

    Robinson AM, Fronk GE, Zhang H, Tonidandel S, Smith MA. The effects of social contact on cocaine intake in female rats. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2017;177:48–53.

  48. 48.

    Saunders BT, Richard JM, Margolis EB, Janak PH. Dopamine neurons create Pavlovian conditioned stimuli with circuit-defined motivational properties. Nat Neurosci. 2018;21:1072–83.

  49. 49.

    Anderson SM, Bari AA, Pierce RC. Administration of the D1-like dopamine receptor antagonist SCH-23390 into the medial nucleus accumbens shell attenuates cocaine priming-induced reinstatement of drug-seeking behavior in rats. Psychopharmacol (Berl). 2003;168:132–8.

  50. 50.

    Calipari ES, Bagot RC, Purushothaman I, Davidson TJ, Yorgason JT, Peña CJ, et al. In vivo imaging identifies temporal signature of D1 and D2 medium spiny neurons in cocaine reward. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2016;113:2726–31.

  51. 51.

    Dackis CA, Gold MS. New concepts in cocaine addiction: The dopamine depletion hypothesis. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 1985;9:469–77.

  52. 52.

    Hummel M, Unterwald EM. D1 dopamine receptor: A putative neurochemical and behavioral link to cocaine action. J Cell Physiol. 2002;191:17–27.

Download references


We would like to thank the NIDA drug supply program for providing the drugs used within this study. ARJ, KCT conceptualized studies, collected data, analyzed data, made figures, wrote manuscript. EGP, LPS, analyzed data and edited the manuscript. AJL, CMS and MGK collected data, analyzed data, and edited the manuscript. ESC conceptualized studies, made figures, and wrote the manuscript.

Author information

Correspondence to Erin S. Calipari.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Further reading

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5