Article | Published:

Altered frontostriatal white matter microstructure is associated with familial alcoholism and future binge drinking in adolescence

Neuropsychopharmacologyvolume 44pages10761083 (2019) | Download Citation

Abstract

Adolescence is a time of significant neurobiological development, including changes in white matter microstructure. Familial alcoholism and adolescent binge-drinking have both been associated with altered white matter microstructure; however, the temporal nature of these effects, and their interaction, is unclear. Using diffusion-weighted imaging and voxel-wise multilevel modeling, the effects of familial alcoholism and future binge-drinking on white matter microstructural development were assessed in 45 adolescents, who went on to binge-drink (but were alcohol-naive at baseline), and 68 adolescents, who remained largely alcohol-naive, all with varying degrees of familial alcoholism. Both future binge-drinking and familial alcoholism were associated with altered frontostriatal white matter microstructure early in adolescence, prior to alcohol use. While several binge-drinking-related effects persisted throughout adolescence (in the posterior limb of the internal capsule, superior corona radiata, and cerebellar peduncles), the association between familial alcoholism and altered white matter microstructure dissipated across adolescence in all regions. There were no white matter regions identified where future binge-drinking or familial alcoholism were significantly associated with emergent or exacerbated alterations in white matter microstructure. Altogether, these findings suggest that alterations in frontostiatal white matter microstructure, some of which are associated with familial alcoholism, may be used to predict which adolescents are more likely to go on and engage in alcohol use. Meanwhile, a reduction in family history-related associations with altered white matter microstructure by late-adolescence is encouraging for future prevention work targeted at at-risk youth.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  1. 1.

    Giedd JN, Blumenthal J, Jeffries NO, Castellanos FX, Liu H, Zijdenbos A, et al. Brain development during childhood and adolescence: a longitudinal MRI study. Nat Neurosci. 1999;2:861–3.

  2. 2.

    Tamnes CK, Ostby Y, Fjell AM, Westlye LT, Due-Tonnessen P, Walhovd KB. Brain maturation in adolescence and young adulthood: regional age-related changes in cortical thickness and white matter volume and microstructure. Cereb Cortex. 2010;20:534–48. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhp118

  3. 3.

    Hagmann P, Jonasson L, Maeder P, Thiran J-P, Wedeen VJ, Meuli R. Understanding diffusion MR imaging techniques: from scalar diffusion-weighted imaging to diffusion tensor imaging and beyond. Radiographics. 2006;26:S205–S23.

  4. 4.

    Alexander AL, Lee JE, Lazar M, Field AS. Diffusion tensor imaging of the brain. neurotherapeutics: the journal of the American Society for Experimental. Neurotherapeutics. 2007;4:316–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nurt.2007.05.011

  5. 5.

    Lebel C, Beaulieu C. Longitudinal development of human brain wiring continues from childhood into adulthood. J Neurosci: Off J Soc Neurosci. 2011;31:10937–47. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.5302-10.2011

  6. 6.

    Achterberg M, Peper JS, van Duijvenvoorde AC, Mandl RC, Crone EA. Frontostriatal white matter integrity predicts development of delay of gratification: A longitudinal study. J Neurosci. 2016;36:1954–61.

  7. 7.

    Seghete KLM, Herting MM, Nagel BJ. White matter microstructure correlates of inhibition and task-switching in adolescents. Brain Res. 2013;1527:15–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2013.06.003

  8. 8.

    Nagy Z, Westerberg H, Klingberg T. Maturation of white matter is associated with the development of cognitive functions during childhood. J Cogn Neurosci. 2004;16:1227–33.

  9. 9.

    Bava S, Frank LR, McQueeny T, Schweinsburg BC, Schweinsburg AD, Tapert SF. Altered white matter microstructure in adolescent substance users. Psychiatry Res: Neuroimaging. 2009;173:228–37.

  10. 10.

    Luciana M, Collins PF, Muetzel RL, Lim KO. Effects of alcohol use initiation on brain structure in typically developing adolescents. Am J Drug Alcohol Abus. 2013;39:345–55. https://doi.org/10.3109/00952990.2013.837057

  11. 11.

    Bava S, Jacobus J, Thayer RE, Tapert SF. Longitudinal changes in white matter integrity among adolescent substance users. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2013;37:E181–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-0277.2012.01920.x

  12. 12.

    Jacobus J, McQueeny T, Bava S, Schweinsburg BC, Frank LR, Yang TT, et al. White matter integrity in adolescents with histories of marijuana use and binge drinking. Neurotoxicol Teratol. 2009;31:349–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ntt.2009.07.006

  13. 13.

    Squeglia LM, Jacobus J, Brumback T, Meloy MJ, Tapert SF. White matter integrity in alcohol-naive youth with a family history of alcohol use disorders. Psychol Med. 2014;44:2775–86. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0033291714000609

  14. 14.

    Herting MM, Schwartz D, Mitchell SH, Nagel BJ. Delay discounting behavior and white matter microstructure abnormalities in youth with a family history of alcoholism. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2010;34:1590–602. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-0277.2010.01244.x

  15. 15.

    Dawson DA, Harford TC, Grant BF. Family history as a predictor of alcohol dependence. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 1992;16:572–5.

  16. 16.

    Acheson A, Wijtenburg SA, Rowland LM, Winkler AM, Gaston F, Mathias CW, et al. Assessment of whole brain white matter integrity in youths and young adults with a family history of substance‐use disorders. Hum Brain Mapp. 2014;35:5401–13.

  17. 17.

    Jones SA, Morales AM, Nagel BJ. Resilience to risk for psychopathology: The role of white matter microstructural development in adolescence. Biol Psychiatry: Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpsc.2018.08.006. (in press)

  18. 18.

    Hill SY, Terwilliger R, McDermott M. White matter microstructure, alcohol exposure, and familial risk for alcohol dependence. Psychiatry Res. 2013;212:43–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pscychresns.2012.11.003

  19. 19.

    Cservenka A, Jones SA, Nagel BJ. Reduced cerebellar brain activity during reward processing in adolescent binge drinkers. Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2015;16:110–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2015.06.004

  20. 20.

    Jones SA, Cservenka A, Nagel BJ. Binge drinking impacts dorsal striatal response during decision making in adolescents. Neuroimage. 2016;129:378–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.01.044

  21. 21.

    Lucas CP, Zhang H, Fisher PW, Shaffer D, Regier DA, Narrow WE, et al. The DISC Predictive Scales (DPS): efficiently screening for diagnoses. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2001;40:443–9.

  22. 22.

    Oldfield RC. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia. 1971;9:97–113.

  23. 23.

    Hollingshead AB, Redlich FC. Social class and mental illness: Community study. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons Inc., 1958.

  24. 24.

    Wechsler D. Wechsler abbreviated scale of intelligence. San Antionio, TX: Psychological Corporation; 1999.

  25. 25.

    Taylor SJ, Whincup PH, Hindmarsh PC, Lampe F, Odoki K, Cook DG. Performance of a new pubertal self-assessment questionnaire: a preliminary study. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2001;15:88–94.

  26. 26.

    Rice JP, Reich T, Bucholz KK, Neuman RJ, Fishman R, Rochberg N, et al. Comparison of direct interview and family history diagnoses of alcohol dependence. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 1995;19:1018–23.

  27. 27.

    Sobell LC, Brown J, Leo GI, Sobell MB. The reliability of the Alcohol Timeline Followback when administered by telephone and by computer. Drug Alcohol Depend. 1996;42:49–54.

  28. 28.

    National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism. Drinking levels defined. (2018). https://www.niaaa.nih.gov/alcohol-health/overview-alcohol-consumption/moderate-binge-drinking. Online document.

  29. 29.

    Alarcon G, Cservenka A, Fair DA, Nagel BJ. Sex differences in the neural substrates of spatial working memory during adolescence are not mediated by endogenous testosterone. Brain Res. 2014;1593:40–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2014.09.057

  30. 30.

    Roalf DR, Quarmley M, Elliott MA, Satterthwaite TD, Vandekar SN, Ruparel K, et al. The impact of quality assurance assessment on diffusion tensor imaging outcomes in a large-scale population-based cohort. Neuroimage. 2016;125:903–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.10.068

  31. 31.

    Chen Y, Tymofiyeva O, Hess CP, Xu D. Effects of rejecting diffusion directions on tensor-derived parameters. Neuroimage. 2015;109:160–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.01.010

  32. 32.

    Saad ZS, Glen DR, Chen G, Beauchamp MS, Desai R, Cox RW. A new method for improving functional-to-structural MRI alignment using local Pearson correlation. Neuroimage. 2009;44:839–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.09.037

  33. 33.

    Andersson JLR, Sotiropoulos SN. An integrated approach to correction for off-resonance effects and subject movement in diffusion MR imaging. Neuroimage. 2016;125:1063–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.10.019

  34. 34.

    Smith SM, Jenkinson M, Woolrich MW, Beckmann CF, Behrens TE, Johansen-Berg H, et al. Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL. Neuroimage. 2004;23:S208–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.07.051

  35. 35.

    Schwarz CG, Reid RI, Gunter JL, Senjem ML, Przybelski SA, Zuk SM, et al. Improved DTI registration allows voxel-based analysis that outperforms tract-based spatial statistics. Neuroimage. 2014;94:65–78.

  36. 36.

    Avants BB, Tustison NJ, Song G, Cook PA, Klein A, Gee JC. A Reproducible evaluation of ANTs similarity metric performance in brain image registration. Neuroimage. 2011;54:2033–44.

  37. 37.

    Ashburner J, Friston KJ. Voxel-based morphometry—the methods. Neuroimage. 2000;11:805–21. https://doi.org/10.1006/nimg.2000.0582

  38. 38.

    Chen G, Saad ZS, Britton JC, Pine DS, Cox RW. Linear mixed-effects modeling approach to FMRI group analysis. Neuroimage. 2013;73:176–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.01.047

  39. 39.

    Forman SD, Cohen JD, Fitzgerald M, Eddy WF, Mintun MA, Noll DC. Improved assessment of significant activation in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI): use of a cluster-size threshold. Magn Reson Med: Off J Soc Magn Reson Med / Soc Magn Reson Med. 1995;33:636–47.

  40. 40.

    Singer JD, Willett JB. Applied longitudinal data analysis: Modeling change and event occurrence. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2003.

  41. 41.

    Bliese PD, Ployhart RE. Growth modeling using random coefficient models: Model building, testing, and illustrations. Organ Res Methods. 2002;5:362–87.

  42. 42.

    Pinheiro J, Bates D, DebRoy S, Sarkar D, Team RC. Linear and nonlinear mixed effects models. R Package Version. 2009;3:1–117.

  43. 43.

    Koob GF, Volkow ND. Neurocircuitry of addiction. Neuropsychopharmacol: Off Publ Am Coll Neuropsychopharmacol. 2010;35:217.

  44. 44.

    Squeglia LM, Rinker DA, Bartsch H, Castro N, Chung Y, Dale AM, et al. Brain volume reductions in adolescent heavy drinkers. Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2014;9:117–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2014.02.005

  45. 45.

    Squeglia LM, Tapert SF, Sullivan EV, Jacobus J, Meloy MJ, Rohlfing T, et al. Brain development in heavy-drinking adolescents. Am J Psychiatry. 2015;172:531–42. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2015.14101249

  46. 46.

    Morein-Zamir S, Robbins TW. Fronto-striatal circuits in response-inhibition: Relevance to addiction. Brain Res. 2015;1628:117–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2014.09.012

  47. 47.

    Sercombe H. Risk, adaptation and the functional teenage brain. Brain Cogn. 2014;89:61–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2014.01.001

  48. 48.

    Cousijn J, Luijten M, Ewing SWF. Adolescent resilience to addiction: a social plasticity hypothesis. Lancet Child & Adolesc Health. 2018;2:69–78.

  49. 49.

    Simmonds DJ, Hallquist MN, Asato M, Luna B. Developmental stages and sex differences of white matter and behavioral development through adolescence: A longitudinal diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) study. Neuroimage. 2014;92:356–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.12.044

  50. 50.

    Morales AM, Jones SA, Ehlers A, Lavine JB, Nagel BJ. Ventral striatal response during decision making involving risk and reward is associated with future binge drinking in adolescents. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41386-018-0087-8

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge past and present members of the Developmental Brain Imaging Lab for their assistance in participant recruitment, scheduling, and data collection.

Funding and disclosure

This work was supported by the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (R01 AA017664 - B.J.N.). The authors declare no competing interests.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychiatry, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA

    • Scott A. Jones
    •  & Bonnie J. Nagel
  2. Department of Behavioral Neuroscience, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA

    • Bonnie J. Nagel

Authors

  1. Search for Scott A. Jones in:

  2. Search for Bonnie J. Nagel in:

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bonnie J. Nagel.

Supplementary information

About this article

Publication history

Received

Revised

Accepted

Published

Issue Date

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41386-019-0315-x