Modulation of Gpr39, a G-protein coupled receptor associated with alcohol use in non-human primates, curbs ethanol intake in mice


Alcohol use disorder (AUD) is a chronic condition with devastating health and socioeconomic effects. Still, pharmacotherapies to treat AUD are scarce. In a prior study aimed at identifying novel AUD therapeutic targets, we investigated the DNA methylome of the nucleus accumbens core (NAcc) of rhesus macaques after chronic alcohol use. The G-protein coupled receptor 39 (GPR39) gene was hypermethylated and its expression downregulated in heavy alcohol drinking macaques. GPR39 encodes a Zn2+-binding metabotropic receptor known to modulate excitatory and inhibitory neurotransmission, the balance of which is altered in AUD. These prior findings suggest that a GPR39 agonist would reduce alcohol intake. Using a drinking-in-the-dark two bottle choice (DID-2BC) model, we showed that an acute 7.5 mg/kg dose of the GPR39 agonist, TC-G 1008, reduced ethanol intake in mice without affecting total fluid intake, locomotor activity or saccharin preference. Furthermore, repeated doses of the agonist prevented ethanol escalation in an intermittent access 2BC paradigm (IA-2BC). This effect was reversible, as ethanol escalation followed agonist “wash out”. As observed during the DID-2BC study, a subsequent acute agonist challenge during the IA-2BC procedure reduced ethanol intake by ~47%. Finally, Gpr39 activation was associated with changes in Gpr39 and Bdnf expression, and in glutamate release in the NAcc. Together, our findings suggest that GPR39 is a promising target for the development of prevention and treatment therapies for AUD.


Alcohol use disorder (AUD) afflicted ~6.2% (15 million) adults in the United States in 2015 [1]. Yet despite the long-lasting health and economic burdens, current AUD treatment options are limited to a 30-day rehabilitation program and three FDA approved drugs (naltrexone, acamprosate, and disulfiram). These treatments have limited success, as two-thirds of individuals with AUD relapse within months of treatment cessation [2]. Thus, the critical challenge remains to identify effective pharmacological treatments that curb alcohol abuse.

We published a genome-wide DNA methylation (GW-DNAm) analysis to identify differentially methylated regions (DMRs) associated with chronic alcohol use in the nucleus accumbens core (NAcc) of non-human primates [3]. The identified DMRs mapped to genes involved in synaptic function, potentially mediating the neuroadaptations associated with sustained alcohol abuse. Here, we test the strength of our GW-DNAm approach to identify novel therapeutic targets by altering the protein activity of one of the differentially methylated genes and testing its impact on alcohol consumption. The G-protein coupled receptor 39 (GPR39) gene was hypermethylated and downregulated in heavy alcohol drinking macaques, which consumed >3 g/kg/day over 12 months of access. As selective GPR39 agonists are commercially available, we tested the hypothesis that increased GPR39 activity would reduce alcohol intake.

GPR39 encodes a Zn2+-binding receptor that is a member of the ghrelin receptor family A [4,5,6]. The widely expressed GPR39 gene has been linked to a range of physiological functions, including glucose homeostasis, gastric emptying, and inflammation [7,8,9,10,11,12,13]. In the central nervous system, the endogenous ligand of GPR39, Zn2+, modulates N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA), γ-aminobutyric acid type A (GABAA), and glycine receptors. Furthermore, Zn2+/GPR39 activity regulates glutamate and GABA signaling in the hippocampus, amygdala, and dorsal cochlear nucleus [14, 15], thereby modulating excitatory and inhibitory responses [16,17,18,19,20,21]. Consistent with its role in maintaining neurotransmitter homeostasis, GPR39 has been linked to psychiatric disorders. GPR39 is downregulated in the frontal cortex and hippocampus of Zn2+-deficient rodents and suicide victims [13], but upregulated after chronic antidepressant treatment [22]. Furthermore, anxiety- and depressive-like behaviors were reported in Gpr39 knockout mice [23], and an antidepressant response was observed following a Gpr39 agonist treatment in wild-type mice [23, 24]. In both of these studies, lack of Gpr39 was accompanied by decreased Creb and Bdnf expression, while Gpr39 agonist increased Bdnf expression [23, 24]; these two proteins are widely associated with psychiatric disorders, including alcohol abuse [25]. While the mechanism(s) linking GPR39 and neurotransmitter homeostasis remains unclear, its association with psychiatric disorders, in combination with our alcohol-associated differential DNAm findings, warrants the study of its role in regulating alcohol intake.

Here we report the first study examining the potential use of a Gpr39 agonist for the reduction of alcohol intake in a preclinical rodent model of AUD. TC-G 1008 is a potent and selective GPR39 agonist, with EC50 values of 0.4 and 0.8 nM for rat and human receptors, respectively [26]. TC-G 1008 reduced anxiety- and depression-like behaviors in mice [24] and showed marked activity in the absence of Zn2+ [27]. Our study demonstrates that administration of 7.5 mg/kg TC-G 1008 prevented alcohol escalation and reduced established drinking in mice after acute administration, potentially through a shift towards neuronal excitation in the NAcc.

Materials and methods


Ten-week-old male C57BL/6J mice (Jackson Laboratory, Sacramento, CA, USA) were individually housed in custom lickometer chambers under a reversed 12-h light/dark cycle (lights on at 21.30) and acclimated to a temperature- and humidity-controlled room for 1 week before experiment onset. Food and water were available ad libitum. Mice (26.27 ± 0.24 g) were weighed daily before each drinking session. There were no changes in weight over time or between treatment groups (Figure S1). All animal procedures were conducted according to the National Institutes of Health Animal Care and Use Committee Guidelines and were approved by the ONPRC Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.

Drinking paradigms

Two bottle choice (2BC)

Modified drinking-in-the-dark (DID) and intermittent access (IA) procedures involved 2BC. Following acclimation, mice were presented with 2 water bottles for two consecutive days before alcohol sessions started to counterbalance groups based on baseline fluid intake. During 2BC sessions, mice had access to a 10% v/v ethanol bottle (Supplementary Methods) and a water bottle. Drinking patterns were acquired by lickometer circuits and recorded via MED-PC IV software (MED Associates, Inc., St. Albans, VT USA) [28]. Lick events were analyzed by custom R scripts (, and a ‘bout’ was defined as ≥20 licks with <5-min pause between consecutive licks.

For DID, 10 ml graduated tubes were filled with 10% v/v ethanol or water, and fluid intake was determined by volume displacement to the nearest 0.05 ml. For IA, 50 ml bottles were used and fluid intakes were determined by weight displacement after the session. For ethanol ‘off’ days, two 50 ml water bottles were provided. Two control chambers (no resident mouse) were monitored to account for changes in volume due to evaporation or housing rack movement.

Dose-response using DID-2BC

Based on prior work [29, 30], DID-2BC was selected for assessing TC-G 1008 dose-response effects on alcohol intake. Mice (n = 11) began DID-2BC 2 h into the dark cycle (11.30) for a duration of 4-h/day, 7 days/week. At the end of each drinking session, the volume of fluid tubes was recorded and tubes were replaced with two water bottles. Mice reached stable alcohol drinking levels over a 2-week period (Fig. 1a) before starting a TC-G 1008 dose-response analysis using a within-subject design and 4 drug doses that were selected based on earlier in vivo mouse studies [24]: 2, 5, 10, and 15 mg/kg. However, since we noted that mice significantly decreased water consumption following the 10 mg/kg dose, the planned 15 mg/kg dose was substituted with 7.5 mg/kg (Fig. 1a). Mice received vehicle or TC-G 1008 10 min prior to the DID-2BC sessions. To ensure recovery of baseline alcohol intake, at least two vehicle pretreatment sessions interspersed TC-G 1008 doses (Fig. 1a). Details on drug preparation can be found in Supplementary Methods.

Fig. 1

Effects of different doses of the GPR39 agonist, TC-G 1008, on ethanol intake in a Drinking-in-the-Dark 2 bottle choice (DID-2BC) paradigm. a Schematic representation of the DID-2BC and drug administration timeline. After reaching an alcohol intake plateau, mice received 4 doses of the agonist (2, 5, 7.5, and 10 mg/kg), allowing recovery time in between doses. “A” is for alcohol and “W” is for water. The syringe represents the day of vehicle or TC-G 1008 administration. b Average daily ethanol intake (g/kg/4 h) and c water intake (ml/kg/4 h). White circles represent the drug-administration sessions. d Alcohol intake (g/kg/4 h), e preference (EPR, volume ratio) and f total fluid intake (TFI, ml/kg/4 h) were measured at the end of the 4-h drinking sessions. Data are represented as mean ± SEM, n = 11. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, repeated measures ANOVA with Bonferroni post hoc test (baseline against each dose). Each dose is represented by a different pattern. g, h Cumulative ethanol (g/kg) intake and TFI (ml/kg) at each hour of the 4-h session. Data are represented as mean ± SEM, n = 11. Between group at each hour: *p < 0.05 vehicle vs 7.5 and 10 mg/kg, ^p < 0.05 vehicle vs 10.0 mg/kg; Within subjects per each agonist dose: ap < 0.05 all hours vs all hours, bp < 0.05 h 1 vs 3–4, cp < 0.05 h 1 vs 2, dp < 0.05 h 2 vs 3–4, ep < 0.05 h 1 vs 4, fp < 0.05 h 2 vs 3–4, gp < 0.05 h 3 vs 4. Vehicle (white circle), 2 mg/kg (black circle), 5 mg/kg (white diamond), 7.5 mg/kg (white triangle), 10 mg/kg (black square)

Alcohol escalation using IA-2BC

A cohort of naive mice (n = 32) underwent a modified IA-2BC procedure [31, 32] to determine the effect of TC-G 1008 on alcohol use escalation. Twenty-two mice had access to 10% v/v ethanol and water bottles while the remaining 10 mice had access to two water bottles (water-vehicle group). All mice had 2BC access for 22-h, every other day, for a total of 4 weeks (Fig. 3a). Each session started 2-h into the dark cycle (11.30). Baseline water intake (ml/kg) and side preference were used to counterbalance mice across groups (n = 10, 11, 11, water-vehicle, ethanol-vehicle, and ethanol-agonist; respectively). For the first 6 IA-2BC sessions, water-/ethanol-vehicle and ethanol-agonist mice received vehicle or 7.5 mg/kg TC-G 1008, respectively. For sessions 6–13, water and both ethanol groups received vehicle injections to determine the impact of discontinued TC-G 1008 treatment in the ethanol-agonist group. An acute drug challenge was given to the ethanol-agonist group on session 14. During a final IA-2BC session mice again received either vehicle or agonist, and were euthanized 3-h post injection. Blood was immediately collected to measure blood ethanol concentration (BEC) via an ambient headspace sampling gas chromatography method [33].

Statistical analysis

Repeated measures ANOVA with simple contrasts and Bonferroni post hoc tests were used to analyze TC-G 1008 dose effects on ethanol and water intake, ethanol preference ratio (EPR) and total fluid intake (TFI). Two-way mixed ANOVA was used to compare TC-G 1008 effects on ethanol intake, EPR, water intake and TFI in the IA-2BC procedure. If there was an interaction between the experimental groups (vehicle vs agonist), session and the dependent variables (ethanol intake, EPR, water intake, and TFI), we followed up with a one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni post hoc testing. Linear mixed models determined the effect of mediator variables (bout frequency, bout size, inter-bout interval, bout duration, and lick rate) on ethanol drinking associated with 7.5 mg/kg versus baseline/vehicle. Two-way ANOVA tested data from the locomotor study. The effect of the agonist on saccharin intake, preference and TFI was investigated using two-way mixed ANOVA. Two-way repeated measures ANOVA was used to analyze the hourly lick-values. A one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni post hoc testing was used to compare differential gene expression across groups. Finally, we used a one-way ANOVA with Sidak post hoc testing to compare the effects of the agonist on spontaneous excitatory and inhibitory postsynaptic currents (sEPSCs and sIPSCs, respectively) across the different experimental groups. To compare the effects of the agonist on sEPSCs and sIPSCs within the same cells we used a paired t-test. In general, if the assumption on homogeneity of variance was violated, we applied the nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis test (i.e. Bdnf) or Welch-ANOVA (i.e. percent change of sIPSCs). In addition, if the sphericity was not met, as assessed by Maulchly’s test, we applied a Greenhouse-Geisser correction. Mean ± SEMs are presented and p < 0.05 was considered significant.


Acute administration of TC-G 1008 reduces ethanol intake and preference

Under a DID-2BC paradigm, mice escalated ethanol intake until reaching a plateau (day 1: 1.2 g/kg vs day 12: 6.0 g/kg, Fig. 1b) that was maintained for 6 consecutive days. While acute administration of lower TC-G 1008 doses (2 and 5 mg/kg) exhibited no effect on ethanol intake, EPR or TFI (Fig. 1b–f), the 7.5 and 10 mg/kg doses significantly reduced ethanol consumption by 33% and 67%, respectively (F1.99,19.88 = 17.40, p = 4.40e−5; Bonferroni: p7.5 mg/kg = 0.04; p10 mg/kg = 4.56e−4; Fig. 1b, d). Neither 7.5 nor 10 mg/kg TC-G 1008 altered alcohol intake 24-h after drug administration (Fig. 1b). Relative to baseline, the 7.5 mg/kg dose reduced EPR (F1.86,18.56 = 11.35, p = 1e−3; Bonferroni: p7.5 mg/kg = 8e−3; Fig. 1e) by both decreasing alcohol consumption (Fig. 1d) and significantly increasing water intake (baseline: 13.14 ± 7.06 ml/kg; 7.5 mg/kg: 26.35 ± 13.01 ml/kg; F4,40 = 6.75, p = 2.99e−4; Bonferroni: p7.5 mg/kg = 4e−3), which culminated in an unaltered TFI (F2.07,20.68 = 10.49, p = 1e−3; Bonferroni: p7.5 mg/kg = 0.98; Fig. 1f). Similarly, 10 mg/kg TC-G 1008 reduced EPR (p10 mg/kg = 8e−3; Fig. 1e). However, the increase in water intake was modest (23.36 ± 13.11 g/kg; p10 mg/kg = 0.16), resulting in a significant reduction in TFI (p10 mg/kg = 4e−3; Fig. 1f) as compared to baseline. Moreover, this modest increase in water intake persisted 24 h following drug administration (Fig. 1c) before reaching baseline levels 48 h post drug administration. Overall, these results identified 7.5 mg/kg TC-G 1008 as an optimal dose for subsequent study. Drinking pattern analyses of this particular dose revealed that the reduction in ethanol intake was attributable to decreases in both bout frequency and average bout size (p = 2.14e−9, p = 2.32e−8; respectively, Tables S1, S2).

To delineate the temporal effects of TC-G 1008 treatment on fluid intakes, we evaluated hourly ethanol and water lick distributions throughout the DID-2BC sessions. Overall, 7.5 mg/kg TC-G 1008 significantly suppressed cumulative ethanol licks during the first 2 h compared to baseline (Table S3a, 3b). This effect persisted through hour 4, although it was not significant (ph 3 = 0.06, ph 4 = 0.06, Fig. 1g, Table S3b). Importantly, cumulative water licks were significantly lower during hour 1, but higher during hour 4 compared to baseline (Table S3b), suggesting that the lower TFI intake with TC-G 1008 (7.5 mg/kg) observed during the first 3 h (Fig. 1h) was driven by reduced ethanol and water intake during hour 1, but without alterations in water intake during hours 2 and 3. At hour 4, the increase in water licks (Fig. 1g, Table S3a–c) and recovery of ethanol licks resulted in a similar cumulative TFI as compared to baseline (Fig. 1h, Table S3a–c).

TC-G 1008 (7.5 mg/kg) did not alter LMA (Supplementary Methods), as there was no distance or velocity × group interaction (F4.88,78.08 = 0.99, p = 0.42, partial η2 = 0.06, ε = 0.44, F5.14,87.34 = 0.79, p = 0.57, partial η2 = 0.04, ε = 0.47, respectively, Fig. 2b, c). Further, TC-G 1008 did not affect saccharin intake (Supplementary Methods), as there was no session × group interaction (saccharin intake: F1.36,24.38 = 2.71, p = 0.10, partial η2 = 0.13, ε = 0.68; saccharine preference: F1.25,22.56 = 2.44, p = 0.13, partial η2 = 0.12, ε = 0.63; TFI: F1.37,24.56 = 1.28, p = 0.28, partial η2 = 0.07, ε = 0.68, Fig. 2d–f), simple main effect of treatment group on the day of the agonist treatment (pSac.intake = 0.17, pSac.preference = 0.12, pTFI = 0.20, Fig. 2d–f), or within-subject effect between baseline and session of agonist treatment (pSac.intake = 0.50, pSac.preference = 0.51, pTFI = 0.60, Fig. 2d–f) on saccharin intake, preference or TFI. Therefore, reductions in ethanol intake cannot be explained by agonist-induced changes in general reward sensitivity, and further suggest that TC-G 1008 effects exhibit specificity for alcohol preference.

Fig. 2

Effects of the 7.5 mg/kg TC-G 1008 agonist dose on locomotor activity (LMA) and saccharin intake in a DID-2BC paradigm. a Schematic representation of the LMA, saccharin studies and drug administration (dose of 7.5 mg/kg). “W” is water and “S” is saccharin. The syringe represents the day of vehicle or TC-G 1008 administration. LMA is reported as b total ambulatory distance (cm/1 h) and c average velocity (cm/5 min) during the 1 h duration of the LMA study. d Saccharin intake (mg/kg/4 h), e preference (volume ratio) and f total fluid intake (TFI, ml/kg/4 h) prior, during and 24 h after 7.5 mg/kg administration. Data are represented as mean ± SEM. In df, Bas (black bars) refers to the corresponding measurement at baseline (average of the two days prior to vehicle or TC-G 1008 administration). Saccharin intake, preference or TFI is represented in dark gray or in a dotted pattern in the vehicle- or TC-G1008-receiving group, respectively

TC-G 1008 prevents ethanol escalation

After demonstrating that 7.5 mg/kg TC-G 1008 acutely reduces established ethanol drinking in a DID-2BC procedure, we tested its ability to prevent ethanol escalation with repeated administration (Fig. 3a) in alcohol naive mice. There was an interaction between session and group on ethanol intake, EPR and TFI (F2.12,42.46 = 3.93, p = 0.03; F2.28,45.55 = 6.50, p = 2e−03; F3,30 = 7.01, p = 4.04e−04; respectively). Main effects analyses showed that during the first IA-2BC session, mice receiving TC-G 1008 had a significant reduction in ethanol intake (ethanol-vehicle: 8.20 ± 1.60 g/kg; ethanol-agonist: 3.21 ± 1.60 g/kg; F1,20 = 4.86, p = 0.04), and no effect on TFI (ethanol-vehicle: 169.56 ± 10.49 ml/kg; ethanol-agonist: 155.83 ± 10.49 ml/kg, F1,20 = 0.86, p = 0.37). EPR was also lower in the ethanol-agonist group as compared to the ethanol-vehicle group, although the difference was not significant (0.21 ± 0.09 vs 0.48 ± 0.09; respectively, F1,20 = 3.98, p = 0.06). The agonist’s effects were even more pronounced in sessions 2–6 when ethanol-vehicle mice demonstrated an anticipated escalation in ethanol intake; whereas, ethanol-agonist mice continued to exhibit significantly blunted ethanol intakes (session 6, F1,20 = 37.67, p = 5e−6) and EPR (session 6, F1,20 = 0.96, p = 2e−6). The dramatic reduction in ethanol intake by the ethanol-agonist group was accompanied by a significant increase in both water intake (session 6, ethanol-vehicle: 26.02 ± 15.60 ml/kg; ethanol-agonist: 171.74 ± 15.60 ml/kg; F1,20 = 43.62, p = 2e−6) and TFI (session 6, F1,20 = 6.07, p = 0.02, Fig. 3g). The reduction in ethanol intake was driven by significant decreases in ethanol bout frequency (F1,20 = 35.76, p = 8e−6, Fig. 3h), mean bout size (F1,20 = 14.9, p = 2e−3, Fig. 3i) first bout size (F1,15 = 5.53, p = 0.03, Fig. 3j), mean lick rate (F1,20 = 8.92, p = 9e−3) and increases in inter-bout interval (IBI, F1,20 = 2.28, p = 0.01) (Table S4a).

Fig. 3

Effects of the GPR39 agonist, TC-G 1008, on ethanol escalation. a Timeline of the Intermittent Access, 2BC, paradigm (IA-2BC). “V” is for vehicle and “Ag” is for agonist. The syringe represents the day of vehicle and/or TC-G 1008 administration. b Daily ethanol intake (g/kg/22 h), c ethanol preference ratio (EPR, volume ratio) and d total fluid intake (TFI, ml/kg/22 h) of ethanol-vehicle group (black circles) and ethanol-agonist group (patterned and white circles). The patterned circle represents the drug-administration sessions, and the white circles the sessions with no agonist administered. e Ethanol intake (g/kg/22 h), f EPR and g TFI (ml/kg/22 h) were measured at the end of three 22 h drinking sessions: 6, 13, and 14. While one group always received a vehicle injection at each one of these sessions, the other group received TC-G 1008 during sessions 6 and 14 (dotted bars), but vehicle at session 13 (dark gray). h Ethanol bout frequency, i mean ethanol bout size (g/kg) and j mean first bout size (g/kg) measured at the end of three 22 h drinking sessions: 6, 13, and 14 are shown. Data are represented as mean ± SEM, n = 11. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001, repeated measures ANOVA with Bonferroni post hoc test. k Number of ethanol licks and l cumulative ethanol licks at each hour of the 22 h session. For k, see Table S6 for detailed significance data. For l, the statistical significance is as follows: *p < 0.05 vehicle vs TC-G 1008 at session 6 and 14, #p < 0.05 session 6 vs session 13, ^p < 0.05 session 13 vs session 14, two-way repeated measures ANOVA with Bonferroni post hoc test. The legend for k and l is shown on the top right corner of panel l. Briefly, vehicle (white circle), day 6 (black circle), day 13 (black triangle), day 14 (black square)

To test whether the behavioral effects of the agonist were reversible, TC-G 1008 treatment was discontinued in the ethanol-agonist group during sessions 7–13 (Fig. 3a). Overall, ethanol intakes and EPR partially recovered in the ethanol-agonist group as compared to session 6 (F1,10 = 12.75, p = 0.05, F1,10 = 12.06, p = 0.03; respectively, Fig. 3e, f). Although these levels were lower than those observed in the ethanol-vehicle group (F1,20 = 10.80, p = 4e−3, F1,20 = 9.63, p = 6e−3), when excluding 4 of the 11 ethanol-agonist animals that showed no reversibility in ethanol intake (Figure S2) in the presence or absence of the agonist, ethanol intake and preference at session 13 were similar to those from ethanol-vehicle subjects (F1,16 = 3.84, p = 0.07, F1,16 = 3.05, p = 0.10, respectively). The recovery of ethanol intake and preference in the whole ethanol-agonist group (n = 11) was accompanied by a shift in drinking patterns that included increases in bout frequency, mean and first bout sizes, and lick rate as well as a decrease in IBI (p > 0.05; Fig. 3h–j, Table S4a).

In order to assess TC-G 1008 effects after alcohol escalation, and to replicate earlier findings from the dose-response analysis (DID-2BC experiment), an acute challenge with the 7.5 mg/kg was administered to the ethanol-agonist group on session 14. Ethanol intake and preference were significantly reduced as compared to session 13 (F1,10 = 12.75, p = 0.01, F1,10 = 12.06, p = 0.01; respectively, Fig. 3e, f). When considering only the 7 subjects that exhibited ethanol escalation after the drug was “washed out”, ethanol intake and preference were reduced by 47 and 60%, respectively (F1,16 = 21.89, p = 2.50e−4, F1,16 = 77.55, p = 1.56e−7; respectively, Figure S2). These results confirm the ability of TC-G 1008 to acutely reduce established ethanol intake levels in the IA-2BC paradigm. Attenuated ethanol intake in the ethanol-agonist group (n = 11) during session 14 was accompanied by an increase in latency to 1st ethanol bout (Table S4a).

TC-G 1008 treatment caused a significant increase in water intake (ethanol-vehicle: 26.02 ± 15.60 ml/kg, ethanol-agonist: 171.74 ± 15.60 ml/kg, F1,20 = 43.62, p = 2e−6) and TFI (F1,20 = 6.07, p = 0.02, Fig. 3g) on session 6 as compared to the vehicle group. A similar water intake increase was observed after acute TC-G 1008 administration (session 14: ethanol-vehicle: 10.03 ± 10.02 ml/kg, ethanol-agonist: 151.07 ± 10.02 ml/kg, F1,20 = 99.08, p = 3.42e−9) as compared to session 13 (F1,10 = 28.42, p = 0.045); however, no change in TFI between sessions 13 and 14 was observed (F1,10 = 687.60, p = 0.47), suggesting the reduction in ethanol intake was compensated for by water intake after acute dosing.

The hourly drinking patterns of sessions 6, 13, and 14 (Fig. 3k, l) were further examined because of their potential relevance to the temporal TC-G 1008 effects on drinking escalation and maintenance of excessive intake levels. Ethanol-vehicle animals consumed the vast majority of alcohol during the dark cycle (hours 0–10, Fig. 3k, l), whereas during repeated TC-G 1008 treatment (session 6) subjects maintained very low levels of ethanol licking throughout the 22 h session, a finding consistent with the significant reductions in bout frequency and bout size (Fig. 3h–j, Table S4a). When TC-G 1008 treatment was discontinued, ethanol-agonist mice adopted similar drinking patterns (i.e., elevated bout frequency and bout sizes), as observed in ethanol-vehicle animals in session 13 (Fig. 3h–k, Table S4a). Consequently, the cumulative licks were similar to the ethanol-vehicle group and were significantly different from session 6 (Fig. 3l, Table S4b). When an acute TC-G 1008 dose was administered (session 14), the drinking during the dark-phase was largely suppressed, with the greatest disruption occurring during the first 3–5 h post drug administration (Fig. 3k, Table S4b). Taken in conjunction with the temporal influence of TC-G 1008 noted above (Fig. 1g), the therapeutic effects of TC-G 1008 in reducing alcohol drinking is most pronounced during the first 3 h, but can extend to ~5 h. We examined the most sensitive 3-h time period for agonist effects on BECs (session 15) and found that levels were significantly lower in the ethanol-agonist group as compared to ethanol-vehicle group (3 ± 3 and 82 ± 16 mg%, respectively, p = 4.52e−4). Furthermore, BEC and ethanol intake levels were positively correlated (r2 = 0.73, p = 2.62e−7).

Gpr39 and Bdnf expression are increased after TC-G 1008 administration

Agonist treatment resulted in a significant increase in Gpr39 expression as compared to water-vehicle mice (Fig. 4a; F2,27 = 5.34, p = 0.01). A trend in the same direction was observed between ethanol-agonist and ethanol-vehicle groups (Fig. 4a; p = 0.08). Similarly, Bdnf was significantly overexpressed in ethanol-agonist as compared to both water- and ethanol-vehicle (H2 = −9.88, p = 0.02 and H2 = −8.58, p = 0.046; respectively, Fig. 4b). The expression of Kcc2 was not different between groups. See Supplementary Methods for details on gene expression analysis.

Fig. 4

Effects of the GPR39 agonist, TC-G 1008, on the nucleus accumbens core (NAcc). Relative gene expression of a Gpr39, b Bdnf and c Kcc2 measured in the NAcc of mice that consumed water and were treated with vehicle (water-vehicle), consumed ethanol and were treated with vehicle (ethanol-vehicle), or consumed ethanol and were treated with 7.5 mg/kg TC-G 1008 (ethanol-agonist). d An image of a coronal section containing the NAcc. The box denotes the location in which medium spiny neurons (MSNs) were targeted for electrophysiological recordings. e Whole-cell patch clamp recording of MSNs (n = 14–20 cells) located within the NAcc. Spontaneous excitatory postsynaptic currents (sEPSC) and spontaneous inhibitory postsynaptic currents (sIPSC) were recorded before (baseline) and during bath application of TC-G 1008 (0.1 nM, 1 nM, 100 nM, or 1 μM). f Average frequency of sEPSC and sIPSC during baseline (black bars) and bath application of TC-G 1008 (shades of gray bars). Data analyzed by paired t-test. g, h Percent change of bath application of TC-G 1008 (0.1–1 μM) from baseline (dotted line) in sEPSC and sIPSC characteristic of frequency g and the excitatory/inhibitory ratio of frequency h. Data are represented as mean ± SEM. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001

TC-G 1008 biases towards enhanced excitatory transmission

Spontaneous excitatory postsynaptic currents (sEPSC) and spontaneous inhibitory postsynaptic currents (sIPSC) were recorded from MSNs located within the NAcc (Fig. 4d) in ex vivo slices before (baseline), during bath application of TC-G 1008 at different concentrations (0.1 nM–1 μM, Supplementary Methods; Fig. 4e), and following wash out of the drug (data not shown). The mean ± SEM frequency (Fig. 4f), amplitude, rise time, decay time and area are presented in Table S5. Baseline frequency of sEPSC and sIPSCs did not differ across treatment group (sEPSC frequency F3,40 = 1.49, p = 0.23; sIPSC frequency F3,40 = 1.51, p = 0.23; Fig. 4f). However, sEPSC frequency was significantly different across TC-G 1008 doses (sEPSCs: F4,48 = 5.44, p = 6e−4; sIPSCs: F4,48 = 1.29, p = 0.28), with 100 nM showing significantly higher sEPSC frequency as compared to the other doses (p0.1 vs 100 nM = 0.03, p1 vs 100 nM = 0.04, p100 nM vs 1 µM = 2e−4; Fig. 4f). The percent change of sEPSC and sIPSC frequency across the different agonist doses was not different (F3,48 = 1.50, p = 0.23 and F3,48 = 2.44, p = 0.27; respectively). However, when we measured the percent change in sEPSC and sIPSC frequency and amplitude before and after each dose of the agonist, our data revealed that the most consistent effect of the agonist was on sEPSC frequency. Lower concentrations of TC-G 1008 (<1 nM) had a trend toward an increase in the percent change of sEPSC frequency from baseline that was not significant (Fig. 4g p0.1 nM = 0.06; p1 nM = 0.07). However, concentrations above 1 nM led to a significant increase in sEPSC frequency over baseline (Fig. 4g; p100 nM = 0.048; p1 μM = 0.048). Regarding sIPSCs, TC-G 1008 exhibited mixed effects on frequency in that there was a 79.69 ± 6.78 % decrease under baseline only with the application of 1 nM TC-G 1008 (Fig. 4g; p0.1 nM = 0.26; p1 nM = 0.01; p100 nM = 0.90; p1 μM = 0.34). The significant decrease in percent change in sIPSC frequency following 1 nM TC-G 1008 and increase in sEPSCs frequency at concentrations above 100 nM resulted in a significantly greater excitatory/inhibitory ratio of frequency over that of baseline (Fig. 4h; p0.1 nM = 0.09; p1 nM = 0.02; p100 nM = 0.01; p1 μM = 3e-3). At the highest dose tested (1 μM), wash out of the drug for 20 min brought sEPSC and sIPSC frequency back to baseline levels (sEPSC: 97.40 ± 11.61 %; sIPSC: 93.32 ± 5.50 %), confirming that the observed effects on sEPSC frequency were due to bath application of the drug. Together this suggests a bias towards excitatory neurotransmission in the presence of TC-G 1008 as evidenced by an excitatory/inhibitory ratio >1 that increases above that of baseline.


Our results illustrate the power of integrating epigenetic, transcriptomic, circuitry, pharmacological, and behavioral approaches to identify novel targets for the treatment of hazardous alcohol use. By selecting a candidate gene identified in our prior GW-DNAm analysis of the non-human primate NAcc (GPR39) and using the selective agonist TC-G 1008, we demonstrated that manipulation of a DNAm-identified target significantly altered alcohol intake in murine models of binge and escalating drinking. We further showed that TC-G 1008 effects were not attributable to a global suppression of fluid intake or locomotor activity, and were specific to alcohol.

Repeated daily TC-G 1008 administration during the IA-2BC escalation phase markedly attenuated ethanol intake over 22 h access periods. When agonist treatment was discontinued, a delayed escalation of alcohol consumption ensued, indicating that the treatment effects were largely reversible after 7 ethanol sessions. We noted, however, that 4 of the 11 TC-G 1008 mice did not increase alcohol intake post treatment. While this individual variability in escalation rate was similar to that observed in ethanol-vehicle subjects (data not shown), it is possible that additional sessions were needed for some drug-treated animals to obtain control intake levels [34,35,36]. Additionally, given that BECs were essentially undetectable 3 h into an IA-2BC session following acute TC-G 1008 challenge, it is possible that some ethanol-agonist mice were unable to associate the positive reinforcing, intoxicating and discriminative stimulus effects of alcohol with its consumption, thereby precluding the ability of these abuse-related attributes to maintain drug seeking behavior [37]. Additional investigation will be required to distinguish whether Gpr39 receptor activity modulates sensitivity to the rewarding versus the aversive properties of ethanol.

While analyzing quantity and frequency of alcohol intake as a measure of hazardous drinking patterns [38] we found that acute treatment with 7.5 mg/kg TC-G 1008 significantly reduced ethanol consumption by consistently suppressing bout frequency (and bout quantity/size to a lesser extent) in both DID-2BC and IA-2BC procedures. Based on temporal lick patterns, TC-G 1008 exhibited the greatest efficacy throughout the first 3–5 h following injection, observations that are congruent with the reported 7h half-life of TC-G 1008 (10 mg/kg; i.p.) in mice [26]. Taken in conjunction with the ability of TC-G 1008 to prevent an escalating frequency of drinking bouts that typically accompanies consecutive alcohol-access sessions in mice [35], TC-G 1008 may show pharmacotherapeutic promise when administered during active drinking or abstinence when a relapse-associated escalation in drinking is possible [39].

In agreement with a prior study reporting increased Gpr39 after TC-G 1008 administration [24], we similarly observed Gpr39 overexpression with TC-G 1008 treatment. Although the underpinnings of Gpr39 transcriptional regulation in response to agonist are currently unknown, others have suggested that a Gpr39 desensitization mechanism in response to prolonged Zn2+ treatment is important for the regulation of Zn2+/Gpr39 signaling [40]. Similarly, prolonged Gpr39 activation by TC-G 1008 would lead to receptor internalization and degradation, requiring transcription/translational upregulation to produce de novo Gpr39 receptor. Further studies are needed to associate these changes in gene expression with the activity of the functional protein.

Activated Gpr39 upregulates Gαq, Gα12/13 and Gαs pathways [5], leading to transcription mediated by increased inositol turnover and activation of cAMP- and serum-response elements [4, 41]. Prior studies showed reduced hippocampal Creb and Bdnf levels in Gpr39-KO mice [23], while systemic TC-G 1008 significantly increased Bdnf in the hippocampus of wild-type mice [24]. In agreement with these results, we report a significant increase in Bdnf expression in the NAcc of ethanol-agonist mice. Bdnf plays an important role in mediating synaptic transmission and plasticity [42], and is extensively studied for its role in regulating alcohol intake [43]. Accordingly, acute and moderate ethanol intake elevates striatal Bdnf levels, which activates downstream signaling cascades that ultimately limit further ethanol intake. However, after chronic heavy drinking, this protective pathway becomes unresponsive, and striatal Bdnf levels are unaltered [43]. In agreement, our results showed no differences in Bdnf levels between water-vehicle and chronic ethanol-drinkers (ethanol-vehicle). However, acute TC-G 1008 administration may reestablish the Bdnf-dependent protective system, and by increasing Bdnf levels, reduce ethanol intake.

Gpr39 and Bdnf regulate multiple neurotransmitter systems in different brain regions, including glutamate through the endocannabinoid system [44], GABA mediated by the K+/Cl− cotransporter 2 (Kcc2) and NMDA activity [45,46,47,48]. Our ex vivo analysis of glutamatergic and GABAergic synapses in alcohol-naive NAcc slices showed that TC-G 1008-induced alterations in sEPSC frequency ultimately led to a bias towards excitation, suggesting an increase in glutamate release associated with Gpr39 activation. This effect, if also observed in the presence of alcohol, could be mediated by the increase in Bdnf expression in ethanol-agonist mice, as it has been reported that Bdnf enhances glutamate release and increases the frequency of sESPCs in hippocampal neurons [49,50,51]. While further studies are needed to understand the relationship between Gpr39, Bdnf and glutamate release in the presence of alcohol, our results suggest a role for Gpr39 in maintaining excitatory/inhibitory homeostasis in the NAcc.

Extensive evidence shows that ethanol, generally, potentiates GABA and glycine receptors, while it inhibits glutamate receptors suggesting a bias towards inhibition [52,53,54,55]. In terms of neurotransmitter release, while ethanol enhances presynaptic GABA release, its effects on glutamate release are controversial [52, 56, 57]. These variable results could be attributable to the dose of alcohol consumed, with glutamate release inversely related to ethanol concentrations in the striatum [58,59,60]. It has been suggested that the increase in accumbal glutamate with alcohol intake [61, 62] may be a compensatory mechanism to adapt to the chronic inhibitory effects of ethanol [63]. Based on this evidence, we propose a model in which TC-G 1008, by increasing extracellular glutamate, may compensate for the decrease in postsynaptic glutamate activity and increased GABA that has been reported with ethanol exposure. In combination, with the trend towards an increased activity of the postsynaptic glutamatergic receptors, TC-G 1008 may “normalize” the excitatory/inhibitory ratio, reducing ethanol intake.

While the effects of TC-G 1008 in the NAcc lead to a consistent effect on sEPSC frequency, we hypothesize that only an effect of 100 nM TC-G 1008 is seen on postsynaptic characteristics of GABAA receptors (Table S6) due to the promiscuous activities of the GPR39 endogenous ligand, Zn2+. Zinc is known to activate different pathways, including the endocannabinoid system, calcium release, KCC2 activity [14, 15, 64], which could all be contributing to this effect on glutamate and GABA signaling. Future experiments will be needed to explore the role of GPR39 on microcircuitry within the NAcc and the interplay between ethanol, Zn2+ and GPR39 receptor.

Since GPR39 is widely expressed [65, 66], we cannot exclude the possibility that reduced alcohol use is the result of the combined effect of TC-G 1008 on multiple brain and body regions. In addition to the described role of Gpr39 in the NAcc, Gpr39 alterations in brain areas influencing depression and anxiety-like behaviors [12, 13, 22, 23] could contribute to alcohol intake. Furthermore, a recent study showed that two other GPR39 agonists induced somatostatin release and inhibited ghrelin release in gastric mucosal cells [67]. Further evidence has shown that ghrelin inhibits water intake [68] by modulating angiotensin II [69], and ghrelin also stimulates alcohol intake [70,71,72]. Thus, if TC-G 1008 reduced ghrelin levels, it may contribute to reduced alcohol intake. In addition, Zn2+ and Gpr39 in colonocytic cells enhance tight junctional complexes and epithelial barrier function [11, 73]. A loss of tight junction function during Zn2+/Gpr39 dysfunction may contribute to alterations of the gut barrier function, also referred to as “leaky gut”, reported in alcohol-exposed rodents and alcohol-dependent humans [74]. Finally, Gpr39 activity is highly dependent on Zn2+ levels, which are dramatically reduced in the brain of alcoholics [75, 76]. The decrease in Zn2+ (15–25%) was found to be consistent across the brain regions analyzed (9–14 different brain regions), although the frontal cortex, thalamus, amygdala, and hippocampus were more dramatically affected (>20% reduced zinc levels) [75, 76]. While short-term ethanol exposure seems to be insufficient to alter Zn2+ levels in the brain of rodents [74], the combination of chronic ethanol use, together with associated hepatic failure (the liver is actively involved with the metabolism of ingested Zn2+), and dietary deficiencies, are posited to alter cerebral Zn2+ homeostasis and drive a reduction in brain Zn2+ content in human alcoholics. Interestingly, low Zn2+ levels are not only associated with alcoholism; preclinical and clinical data report low Zn2+ levels in the serum of subjects suffering from depression and anxiety disorders (see [41]). Further studies indicate that Zn2+ supplementation may have antidepressant effects (see [41]) and that chronic antidepressant treatment upregulates GPR39 [22]. Extensive evidence supports a causal relationship between AUD and depression (see [77]), that together with a role of a Gpr39 agonist in ameliorating depression-like behaviors [24] and reducing alcohol intake (present study), suggest a common molecular pathway and potential novel therapeutic target for the treatment of comorbid alcohol abuse and depression disorders. Future studies are needed to clarify the interplay of multiple brain regions and/or peripheral systems in the role of GPR39 agonist(s) in suppressing ethanol intake as reported in this study.

In conclusion, this study demonstrates that GW-DNAm approaches can successfully identify novel candidate genes that are promising targets for new AUD therapies. Moreover, this study reports successful cross-species validation, identifying a candidate gene in a non-human primate alcohol use model, then leveraging rodent alcohol models to evaluate potential treatment strategies. In total, these studies identify Gpr39 as a promising, novel candidate for the treatment of hazardous alcohol use. Future studies are needed to clarify the precise molecular and cellular mechanisms linking Gpr39 activity to alterations in synaptic plasticity that ultimately lead to alcohol use.

Funding and disclosure

This study was supported by grants from the National Institute of Health: AA020928 (B.F.), AA019431 (K.A.G.), AA024757 (M.M.F.), and OD011092 (ONPRC). The authors declare no competing interests.


  1. 1.

    SAMHSA. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH). Table 5.8B—Substance dependence or abuse in the past year among persons aged 18 or older, by demographic characteristics: Percentages, 2013 and 2014.

  2. 2.

    Sinha R. The role of stress in addiction relapse. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2007;9:388–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Cervera-Juanes R, Wilhelm LJ, Park B, Grant KA, Ferguson B. Alcohol-dose-dependent DNA methylation and expression in the nucleus accumbens identifies coordinated regulation of synaptic genes. Transl Psychiatry. 2017;7:e994.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Holst B, Holliday ND, Bach A, Elling CE, Cox HM, Schwartz TW. Common structural basis for constitutive activity of the ghrelin receptor family. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:53806–17.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Holst B, Egerod KL, Schild E, Vickers SP, Cheetham S, Gerlach LO, et al. GPR39 signaling is stimulated by zinc ions but not by obestatin. Endocrinology. 2007;148:13–20.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Yasuda S, Miyazaki T, Munechika K, Yamashita M, Ikeda Y, Kamizono A. Isolation of Zn2+ as an endogenous agonist of GPR39 from fetal bovine serum. J Recept Signal Transduct Res. 2007;27:235–46.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Depoortere I. GI functions of GPR39: novel biology. Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2012;12:647–52.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Dittmer S, Sahin M, Pantlen A, Saxena A, Toutzaris D, Pina AL, et al. The constitutively active orphan G-protein-coupled receptor GPR39 protects from cell death by increasing secretion of pigment epithelium-derived growth factor. J Biol Chem. 2008;283:7074–81.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Holst B, Egerod KL, Jin C, Petersen PS, Ostergaard MV, Hald J, et al. G protein-coupled receptor 39 deficiency is associated with pancreatic islet dysfunction. Endocrinology. 2009;150:2577–85.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Moechars D, Depoortere I, Moreaux B, de Smet B, Goris I, Hoskens L, et al. Altered gastrointestinal and metabolic function in the GPR39-obestatin receptor-knockout mouse. Gastroenterology. 2006;131:1131–41.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Cohen L, Sekler I, Hershfinkel M. The zinc sensing receptor, ZnR/GPR39, controls proliferation and differentiation of colonocytes and thereby tight junction formation in the colon. Cell Death Dis. 2014;5:e1307.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Mlyniec K, Budziszewska B, Reczynski W, Sowa-Kucma M, Nowak G. The role of the GPR39 receptor in zinc deficient-animal model of depression. Behav Brain Res. 2013;238:30–35.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Mlyniec K, Doboszewska U, Szewczyk B, Sowa-Kucma M, Misztak P, Piekoszewski W, et al. The involvement of the GPR39-Zn(2+)-sensing receptor in the pathophysiology of depression. Studies in rodent models and suicide victims. Neuropharmacology. 2014;79:290–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Chorin E, Vinograd O, Fleidervish I, Gilad D, Herrmann S, Sekler I, et al. Upregulation of KCC2 activity by zinc-mediated neurotransmission via the mZnR/GPR39 receptor. J Neurosci. 2011;31:12916–26.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Perez-Rosello T, Anderson CT, Ling C, Lippard SJ, Tzounopoulos T. Tonic zinc inhibits spontaneous firing in dorsal cochlear nucleus principal neurons by enhancing glycinergic neurotransmission. Neurobiol Dis. 2015;81:14–19.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Han Y, Wu SM. Modulation of glycine receptors in retinal ganglion cells by zinc. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999;96:3234–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Herin GA, Aizenman E. Amino terminal domain regulation of NMDA receptor function. Eur J Pharmacol. 2004;500:101–11.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Hosie AM, Dunne EL, Harvey RJ, Smart TG. Zinc-mediated inhibition of GABA(A) receptors: discrete binding sites underlie subtype specificity. Nat Neurosci. 2003;6:362–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Lynch JW, Jacques P, Pierce KD, Schofield PR. Zinc potentiation of the glycine receptor chloride channel is mediated by allosteric pathways. J Neurochem. 1998;71:2159–68.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Paoletti P, Ascher P, Neyton J. High-affinity zinc inhibition of NMDA NR1-NR2A receptors. J Neurosci. 1997;17:5711–25.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Swardfager W, Herrmann N, McIntyre RS, Mazereeuw G, Goldberger K, Cha DS, et al. Potential roles of zinc in the pathophysiology and treatment of major depressive disorder. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2013;37:911–29.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Mlyniec K, Nowak G. GPR39 up-regulation after selective antidepressants. Neurochem Int. 2013;62:936–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Mlyniec K, Budziszewska B, Holst B, Ostachowicz B, Nowak G. GPR39 (zinc receptor) knockout mice exhibit depression-like behavior and CREB/BDNF down-regulation in the hippocampus. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2014;23:1–8.

  24. 24.

    Mlyniec K, Starowicz G, Gawel M, Frackiewicz E, Nowak G. Potential antidepressant-like properties of the TC G-1008, a GPR39 (zinc receptor) agonist. J Affect Disord. 2016;201:179–84.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Pandey SC. A critical role of brain-derived neurotrophic factor in alcohol consumption. Biol Psychiatry. 2016;79:427–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Peukert S, Hughes R, Nunez J, He G, Yan Z, Jain R, et al. Discovery of 2-Pyridylpyrimidines as the first orally bioavailable GPR39 agonists. ACS Med Chem Lett. 2014;5:1114–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Sato N, Yamabuki T, Takano A, Koinuma J, Aragaki M, Masuda K, et al. Wnt inhibitor Dickkopf-1 as a target for passive cancer immunotherapy. Cancer Res. 2010;70:5326–36.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Ford MM, Nickel JD, Kaufman MN, Finn DA. Null mutation of 5alpha-reductase type I gene alters ethanol consumption patterns in a sex-dependent manner. Behav Genet. 2015;45:341–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Thiele TE, Navarro M. “Drinking in the dark” (DID) procedures: a model of binge-like ethanol drinking in non-dependent mice. Alcohol. 2014;48:235–41.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Finn DA, Beckley EH, Kaufman KR, Ford MM. Manipulation of GABAergic steroids: sex differences in the effects on alcohol drinking- and withdrawal-related behaviors. Horm Behav. 2010;57:12–22.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Hwa LS, Chu A, Levinson SA, Kayyali TM, DeBold JF, Miczek KA. Persistent escalation of alcohol drinking in C57BL/6J mice with intermittent access to 20% ethanol. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2011;35:1938–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Simms JA, Steensland P, Medina B, Abernathy KE, Chandler LJ, Wise R, et al. Intermittent access to 20% ethanol induces high ethanol consumption in Long-Evans and Wistar rats. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2008;32:1816–23.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Ford MM, Steele AM, McCracken AD, Finn DA, Grant KA. The relationship between adjunctive drinking, blood ethanol concentration and plasma corticosterone across fixed-time intervals of food delivery in two inbred mouse strains. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2013;38:2598–610.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Colombo G, Serra S, Brunetti G, Atzori G, Pani M, Vacca G, et al. The GABA(B) receptor agonists baclofen and CGP 44532 prevent acquisition of alcohol drinking behaviour in alcohol-preferring rats. Alcohol Alcohol. 2002;37:499–503.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Ford MM, Yoneyama N, Strong MN, Fretwell A, Tanchuck M, Finn DA. Inhibition of 5alpha-reduced steroid biosynthesis impedes acquisition of ethanol drinking in male C57BL/6J mice. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2008;32:1408–16.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Serra S, Carai MA, Brunetti G, Gomez R, Melis S, Vacca G, et al. The cannabinoid receptor antagonist SR 141716 prevents acquisition of drinking behavior in alcohol-preferring rats. Eur J Pharmacol. 2001;430:369–71.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Stolerman I. Drugs of abuse: behavioural principles, methods and terms. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 1992;13:170–6.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Dawson DA, Pulay AJ, Grant BF. A comparison of two single-item screeners for hazardous drinking and alcohol use disorder. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2010;34:364–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Allen DC, Gonzales SW, Grant KA. Effect of repeated abstinence on chronic ethanol self-administration in the rhesus monkey. Psychopharmacology. 2018;235:109–20.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Hershfinkel M. The Zinc Sensing Receptor, ZnR/GPR39, in Health and Disease. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;40:439–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Mlyniec K, Singewald N, Holst B, Nowak G. GPR39 Zn(2+)-sensing receptor: a new target in antidepressant development? J Affect Disord. 2015;174:89–100.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Sasi M, Vignoli B, Canossa M, Blum R. Neurobiology of local and intercellular BDNF signaling. Pflug Arch. 2017;469:593–610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Logrip ML, Janak PH, Ron D. Escalating ethanol intake is associated with altered corticostriatal BDNF expression. J Neurochem. 2009;109:1459–68.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Perez-Rosello T, Anderson CT, Schopfer FJ, Zhao Y, Gilad D, Salvatore SR, et al. Synaptic Zn2+ inhibits neurotransmitter release by promoting endocannabinoid synthesis. J Neurosci. 2013;33:9259–72.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Levine ES, Crozier RA, Black IB, Plummer MR. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor modulates hippocampal synaptic transmission by increasing N-methyl-D-aspartic acid receptor activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998;95:10235–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Levine ES, Kolb JE. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor increases activity of NR2B-containing N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors in excised patches from hippocampal neurons. J Neurosci Res. 2000;62:357–62.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Lin SY, Wu K, Levine ES, Mount HT, Suen PC, Black IB. BDNF acutely increases tyrosine phosphorylation of the NMDA receptor subunit 2B in cortical and hippocampal postsynaptic densities. Brain Res Mol Brain Res. 1998;55:20–27.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Suen PC, Wu K, Levine ES, Mount HT, Xu JL, Lin SY, et al. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor rapidly enhances phosphorylation of the postsynaptic N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor subunit 1. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1997;94:8191–5.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Minichiello L. TrkB signalling pathways in LTP and learning. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2009;10:850–60.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Lessmann V, Heumann R. Modulation of unitary glutamatergic synapses by neurotrophin-4/5 or brain-derived neurotrophic factor in hippocampal microcultures: presynaptic enhancement depends on pre-established paired-pulse facilitation. Neuroscience. 1998;86:399–413.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Takei N, Numakawa T, Kozaki S, Sakai N, Endo Y, Takahashi M, et al. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor induces rapid and transient release of glutamate through the non-exocytotic pathway from cortical neurons. J Biol Chem. 1998;273:27620–4.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Moykkynen T, Korpi ER. Acute effects of ethanol on glutamate receptors. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2012;111:4–13.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Lovinger DM, Roberto M. Synaptic effects induced by alcohol. Curr Top Behav Neurosci. 2013;13:31–86.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Soderpalm B, Lido HH, Ericson M. The glycine receptor-A functionally important primary brain target of ethanol. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2017;41:1816–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Cuzon Carlson VC, Grant KA, Lovinger DM. Synaptic adaptations to chronic ethanol intake in male rhesus monkey dorsal striatum depend on age of drinking onset. Neuropharmacology. 2018;131:128–42.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Mameli M, Zamudio PA, Carta M, Valenzuela CF. Developmentally regulated actions of alcohol on hippocampal glutamatergic transmission. J Neurosci. 2005;25:8027–36.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Zhu W, Bie B, Pan ZZ. Involvement of non-NMDA glutamate receptors in central amygdala in synaptic actions of ethanol and ethanol-induced reward behavior. J Neurosci. 2007;27:289–98.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Goodwani S, Saternos H, Alasmari F, Sari Y. Metabotropic and ionotropic glutamate receptors as potential targets for the treatment of alcohol use disorder. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2017;77:14–31.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Hopf FW. Do specific NMDA receptor subunits act as gateways for addictive behaviors? Genes Brain Behav. 2017;16:118–38.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Moghaddam B, Bolinao ML. Biphasic effect of ethanol on extracellular accumulation of glutamate in the hippocampus and the nucleus accumbens. Neurosci Lett. 1994;178:99–102.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Griffin WC 3rd, Haun HL, Hazelbaker CL, Ramachandra VS, Becker HC. Increased extracellular glutamate in the nucleus accumbens promotes excessive ethanol drinking in ethanol dependent mice. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2014;39:707–17.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Spanagel R. Alcoholism: a systems approach from molecular physiology to addictive behavior. Physiol Rev. 2009;89:649–705.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Renteria R, Buske TR, Morrisett RA. Long-term subregion-specific encoding of enhanced ethanol intake by D1DR medium spiny neurons of the nucleus accumbens. Addict Biol. 2018;23:689–98.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Besser L, Chorin E, Sekler I, Silverman WF, Atkin S, Russell JT, et al. Synaptically released zinc triggers metabotropic signaling via a zinc-sensing receptor in the hippocampus. J Neurosci. 2009;29:2890–901.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    McKee KK, Tan CP, Palyha OC, Liu J, Feighner SD, Hreniuk DL, et al. Cloning and characterization of two human G protein-coupled receptor genes (GPR38 and GPR39) related to the growth hormone secretagogue and neurotensin receptors. Genomics. 1997;46:426–34.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Popovics P, Stewart AJ. GPR39: a Zn(2+)-activated G protein-coupled receptor that regulates pancreatic, gastrointestinal and neuronal functions. Cell Mol life Sci. 2011;68:85–95.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Frimurer TM, Mende F, Graae AS, Engelstoft MS, Egerod KL, Nygaard R, et al. Model-based discovery of synthetic agonists for the Zn(2+)-sensing G-protein-coupled receptor 39 (GPR39) reveals novel biological functions. J Med Chem. 2017;60:886–98.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Hashimoto H, Ueta Y. Central effects of ghrelin, a unique peptide, on appetite and fluid/water drinking behavior. Curr Protein Pept Sci. 2011;12:280–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Hashimoto H, Otsubo H, Fujihara H, Suzuki H, Ohbuchi T, Yokoyama T, et al. Centrally administered ghrelin potently inhibits water intake induced by angiotensin II and hypovolemia in rats. J Physiol Sci. 2010;60:19–25.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Farokhnia M, Grodin EN, Lee MR, Oot EN, Blackburn AN, Stangl BL, et al. Exogenous ghrelin administration increases alcohol self-administration and modulates brain functional activity in heavy-drinking alcohol-dependent individuals. Mol Psychiatry. 2017;23:2029–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Leggio L, Zywiak WH, Fricchione SR, Edwards SM, de la Monte SM, Swift RM, et al. Intravenous ghrelin administration increases alcohol craving in alcohol-dependent heavy drinkers: a preliminary investigation. Biol Psychiatry. 2014;76:734–41.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Zallar LJ, Farokhnia M, Tunstall BJ, Vendruscolo LF, Leggio L. The role of the ghrelin system in drug addiction. Int Rev Neurobiol. 2017;136:89–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Sunuwar L, Medini M, Cohen L, Sekler I, Hershfinkel M. The zinc sensing receptor, ZnR/GPR39, triggers metabotropic calcium signalling in colonocytes and regulates occludin recovery in experimental colitis. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2016;371:1700.

    Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Leclercq S, de Timary P, Delzenne NM, Starkel P. The link between inflammation, bugs, the intestine and the brain in alcohol dependence. Transl Psychiatry. 2017;7:e1048.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Kasarskis EJ, Manton WI, Devenport LD, Kirkpatrick JB, Howell GA, Klitenick MA, et al. Effects of alcohol ingestion on zinc content of human and rat central nervous systems. Exp Neurol. 1985;90:81–95.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Hu KH, Friede RL. Topographic determination of zinc in human brain by atomic absorption spectrophotometry. J Neurochem. 1968;15:677–85.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Boden JM, Fergusson DM. Alcohol and depression. Addiction. 2011;106:906–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


The authors thank Houda Mesnaoui for technical assistance.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rita P. Cervera-Juanes.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary methods

Supplementary figure legends

Daily weight of the mice during each experiment

Effects of TC-G on ethanol escalation and acute intake during the IA-2BC procedure

Table S1. Average and SEM of the lickometer measures at the different agonist doses

Table S2. Linear mixed model (LMM) analysis of the lickometer measures between baseline and 7.5 mg/kg of TC-G

Table S3. Cumulative fluid licks at baseline and each of the different agonist doses during the 4 hours duration of each DID-2BC session

Table S4. Ethanol licks and cumulative ethanol licks between ethanol-vehicle and ethanol-agonist mice at sessions 6, 13 and 14 during the 22 hours duration of each IA-2BC session

Table S5: Average sEPSC and sIPSC characteristics measured from MSNs located in the NAcc before (baseline) and during application of TC G-1008. Data are mean + SEM. Statistical significance using a pa

Table S6. Primers used for real time quantitative PCR

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cuzon Carlson, V.C., Ford, M.M., Carlson, T.L. et al. Modulation of Gpr39, a G-protein coupled receptor associated with alcohol use in non-human primates, curbs ethanol intake in mice. Neuropsychopharmacol. 44, 1103–1113 (2019).

Download citation

Further reading


Quick links