The microbiome and host mucosal interactions in urinary tract diseases

Abstract

The urinary tract consists of the bladder, ureters, and kidneys, and is an essential organ system for filtration and excretion of waste products and maintaining systemic homeostasis. In this capacity, the urinary tract is impacted by its interactions with other mucosal sites, including the genitourinary and gastrointestinal systems. Each of these sites harbors diverse ecosystems of microbes termed the microbiota, that regulates complex interactions with the local and systemic immune system. It remains unclear whether changes in the microbiota and associated metabolites may be a consequence or a driver of urinary tract diseases. Here, we review the current literature, investigating the impact of the microbiota on the urinary tract in homeostasis and disease including urinary stones, acute kidney injury, chronic kidney disease, and urinary tract infection. We propose new avenues for exploration of the urinary microbiome using emerging technology and discuss the potential of microbiome-based medicine for urinary tract conditions.

Introduction

It has become apparent that the microbiome in humans is involved in both the maintenance of health and susceptibility to disease at mucosal sites.1 While the substantial focus has been placed on understanding the microbial communities that inhabit the gastrointestinal tract,2,3,4 increasing evidence supports the existence of a genitourinary microbiome.5 Findings obtained from urine microbial culturing,6,7 bacterial genomic sequencing,8,9,10 and metagenomics11,12 have highlighted differences in the urinary microbiome in those individuals with urological conditions compared to healthy individuals. This overturns the long-standing belief that the bladder is a sterile environment.7,8,13 The increasing availability of 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) amplicon sequencing and improved efficiency of shotgun metagenomic and whole-genome sequencing has facilitated a more in-depth understanding of the microbiome. It has now been shown that the urine in the bladder contains a variety of Gram-positive organisms such as Lactobacilli, Streptococci, and Staphylococci.14 Application of these emerging technologies may shed light on host-microbe interactions within the urinary tract during health and disease.

Despite the significant health and financial burden of recurrent urinary tract infection (rUTI), antibiotic therapy remains the mainstay treatment, contributing to the rise of multidrug-resistant uropathogens.15,16,17 Therefore, there is a clear unmet need to develop novel diagnostic approaches and therapeutic interventions to complement existing antimicrobial therapies. This review aims to summarize the current insights into the gastrointestinal, vaginal and urinary, microbiomes, and how they may influence the pathogenesis of urinary tract diseases. We also discuss emerging tools and technologies for the urinary microbiome field and how these methods could be integrated to enable the development of novel therapeutic interventions and obtain a better understanding of host–microbe responses in maintaining urinary tract health.

Interconnection between the gastrointestinal and urinary microbiota

The gastrointestinal tract is commonly considered to be the origin of most bacterial infections in the urinary tract. Escherichia coli is the dominant uropathogen and establishes reservoirs inside the bladder lining. Nielsen et al. investigated reservoirs of E. coli from UTI patients compared to healthy individuals with no history of UTI and found that mutations in the bacterial adhesion molecule FimH, were significantly associated with UTI.18 The fecal flora is also a common reservoir of uropathogenic E. coli (UPEC). Magruder et al. assessed the link between the gastrointestinal microbiome and the likelihood of contracting a UTI. They report that the abundance of uropathogens in the gastrointestinal tract is associated with an increased risk of developing a UTI.19 Analysis of fecal specimens and urine supernatants via metagenomic sequencing identified a 1% relative abundance of E. coli in the gastrointestinal tract as an independent risk factor for UTI.19 To assess the dynamics of pathogen persistence in the urinary tract, Thänert et al. assessed uropathogen carriage in both the urinary and gastrointestinal tracts of patients with rUTI.20 Clonal tracking demonstrated that transmission of uropathogens between gastrointestinal reservoirs and the urinary tract were common and that UTI was commonly preceded by an intestinal bloom of uropathogens in the same individual.20 These relationships are not limited to pathogenic bacteria. Combined culturing and high-resolution genomic analysis identified similarities between the vaginal and the urinary microbial strains (Lactobacillus spp., E. coli, and Streptococcus anginosus), further supporting the existence of an interlinked urogenital microbiome in women.5

Interconnection between the vaginal and urinary microbiota

Vaginal and urinary microbial communities and the relationship between these mucosal sites are becoming increasingly well-characterized and have been recently reviewed.21 Both culturing assays and metagenomic analyses have revealed the existence of an interconnected urogenital microbiota.5,22 This relationship is further supported by studies from Komesu et al. who demonstrate associations between the vaginal and urinary microbiota, with Lactobacillus commonly found at both sites.23 Transurethral inoculation of the common vaginal microbe Gardnerella vaginalis, to the bladder of mice that have recovered from a UPEC infection, demonstrated that G. vaginalis can cause urothelial exfoliation, which in turn leads to the exposure of latent E. coli reservoirs.24 Mice that went on to experience Gardnerella-induced rUTI had more severe primary infection with E. coli compared to animals that did not experience rUTI with G. vaginalis, suggesting that the severity of primary E. coli UTI may be a key determinant of rUTI risk upon secondary exposure.24

Analysis of the urinary microbiota of healthy individuals compared to women with bacterial vaginosis, demonstrated that oral antibiotic treatment significantly reduced the relative abundance of some bacterial species including G. vaginalis, Atopobium vaginae, and Sneathia amnii, while increasing others such as Lactobacillus iners.25 Antimicrobial therapy was also associated with differences in the beta-diversity, but not alpha-diversity of the genitourinary microbiota.26 These data suggest that intervention with antimicrobial drugs alters the composition of the genitourinary microbiota26 and highlights the need to study how the manipulation of the urogenital microbiome may impact on treatment strategies for urinary tract diseases.

Interaction between the gastrointestinal microbiota and the urinary tract in homeostasis

Fundamental studies in Drosophila have revealed that renal filtration of bacterial peptidoglycan, derived from the microbiota, promotes homeostasis and prevents deleterious host immune-driven responses.27 Drosophila deficient in the transcription factor Kruppel Like Factor 15 (Klf15) lacked nephrocytes and displayed increased resistance to infection, compared to their wild-type counterparts, but Klf15-deficient flies had a shorter lifespan.27 In wild-type flies, functional nephrocytes were able to effectively remove peptidoglycan from the circulation.27 These fundamental studies in Drosophila have since been advanced by experimental rodent models and clinical human studies, showing that the kidneys may sense changes in the levels of metabolites derived from the gastrointestinal microbiome.28 However, the role of this gastrointestinal–kidney axis in the pathogenesis of urinary tract disease remains to be elucidated.

The gastrointestinal microbiota also impacts urinary bladder physiology under homeostatic conditions.29 Mice harboring minimal bacteria, as a result of treatment with broad-spectrum antibiotics and mice completely lacking a microbiota through rederivation in germ-free facilities, exhibit reduced urinary bladder size and weight that was not associated with any obvious histological changes to the bladder.29 Transcriptomic analysis of the mouse bladder identified 97 genes that were differentially expressed in germ-free mice compared to specific pathogen-free mice.29 These included genes regulating circadian rhythm, e.g., downregulation of aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator like (Arntl); extracellular matrix proteins, e.g., upregulation of matrix metalloproteinase 12 (Mmp12); and neuromuscular synaptic transmission, e.g., upregulation of Tyrosine hydroxylase.29 Microbiota-deficient mice displayed no change in the expression of genes in the bladder that are known to be responsible for recognizing microbes or their products.29 These data indicate that the gastrointestinal microbiota has an impact in multiple physiological processes in the urinary tract under homeostatic conditions.

Alterations in the gastrointestinal and vaginal microbiome are associated with diseases of the urinary tract

In addition to contributing to urinary tract homeostasis, substantial emerging evidence demonstrates a strong association between the urinary, gastrointestinal and vaginal microbiomes, and various urinary tract diseases (Table 1).

Table 1 The microbiome in urinary tract diseases.

Kidney stone disease

In the last 50 years, the incidence of kidney stone diseases has increased by more than fourfold.30 In the urinary tract, oxalate can combine with calcium to form calcium oxalate stones, which make up the vast majority of kidney stone episodes in humans.31 The enzymes that are required to metabolize oxalate are absent in mammals, who instead rely on their gastrointestinal microbiota for oxalate metabolism.32

Mouse models of fecal transplant suggest that the gastrointestinal microbiome may modulate the risk of developing urinary stones.33 Fecal transplantation from Zucker lean rats into germ-free mice by oral gavage, reduced both oxalate and calcium levels in the urine, which were negatively correlated with the abundance of the Clostridiaceae family.33 Furthermore, fecal transplant increased the expression of the oxalate transporter gene, Solute Carrier Family 26 Member 6.33 Miller et al. assessed oxalate excretion in rats following the oral transfer of fecal-derived microbes from a donor animal that was adapted to a high oxalate diet.34 Transplantation of feces containing oxalate-degrading bacteria to rats was found to increase oxalate metabolism,34 whereas rats that received a fecal transplant had a more diverse bacterial network, consisting of more oxalate-degrading bacteria, than controls.34 Further studies demonstrated that antibiotic exposure in mice caused a disruption in the gastrointestinal microbiota and oxalate metabolism following fecal transplantation, however, the microbial population was able to recover with time.35 In contrast, exposure to a high fat and high sugar diet resulted in a loss of the transplanted bacteria population and decreased oxalate metabolism.35

In humans, the fecal microbiota composition of patients that experience kidney stones also showed reduced bacterial diversity compared to healthy controls.36 In these patients a reduction in Oxalobacter formigenes, a known oxalate-metabolizing bacterial species, was observed compared to healthy controls.37 In similar clinical studies, Gardnerella dominated in healthy controls, whereas Staphylococcus was dominant in non-hypertensive kidney stone patients. There was an overrepresentation of Sphingomonas in hypertensive kidney stone patients.38 Increased use of antimicrobials in urinary stone disease patients has also been associated with changes in both the gastrointestinal microbiome and metabolome, further implicating the gastrointestinal microbiome in kidney stone disease.39 These studies show that the gastrointestinal microbiota can be disrupted by both diet and exposure to antimicrobials, both of which may increase susceptibility to kidney stone disease.

Acute kidney injury

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a potentially fatal, global challenge in critical care medicine. It is also a known risk factor for the development of chronic kidney disease (CKD).40 The loss of the gastrointestinal microbiota by oral antibiotics has been shown to be protective against experimental AKI in mice.41 This is thought to be regulated through renal resident macrophages and microbiota-derived metabolites41,42 as antibiotic-mediated depletion of the gastrointestinal microbiota decreased renal resident macrophages, reduced AKI-induced renal damage, and maintained the integrity of the renal tubules.41 Mice that received a transplant of fecal material from antibiotic-treated mice, were no longer protected against AKI-induced renal damage41 suggesting specific antibiotic-mediated bacterial composition may be driving the detrimental response. Therefore, direct microbiome targeting or amelioration of the microbiota-induced macrophage-driven inflammatory response may be a promising therapeutic strategy in AKI.

The impact of the gastrointestinal microbiota on AKI may be mediated, at least in part, by specific microbial metabolites such as d-amino acids that can be altered in response to dysbiosis.42 Detectable levels of d-serine were found in the mouse kidney and the activity of d-amino acid oxidase was reduced following AKI in mice.42 In human AKI patients, there was a correlation between circulating d-serine levels and decreased kidney function.42 These data shed new light on the interactions between the kidney and gastrointestinal microbiota-derived metabolites in AKI. Further investigation into the role of the gastrointestinal microbiome in AKI, may enable the development of microbiome-derived preventative or therapeutic interventions for AKI.

Chronic kidney disease

Patients with CKD may lose up to 90% of their kidney function before presenting with symptoms. It is a life-threatening condition with dialysis and transplantation the mainstay treatment options for end-stage renal disease. There are a number of studies that demonstrate alterations in the gastrointestinal microbiota of human CKD patients are associated with disease progression. Alterations to the gastrointestinal microbiota are also strongly associated with chronic inflammation, which is a major contributor to the progression of CKD severity.43,44,45,46 The impact of the gastrointestinal microbiome in kidney transplantation, is also established but outside the scope of this review and has been recently reviewed.47

In one CKD study, 190 microbial operational taxonomic units from the gastrointestinal microbiome, exhibited significant differences in relative abundance in late-stage CKD patients, compared with healthy controls.48 The majority of these operational taxonomic units (159) belonged to the Pseudomonadaceae family. CKD patients had reduced Lactobacillaceae and Prevotellaceae, but 100-fold increased Enterobacteria and Enterococci species.49 These same species are also increased in patients with late-stage CKD.48 Moreover, during the later stages of CKD, the abundance of Roseburia, Faecalibacterium, Clostridium, Coprococcus, and Prevotella were decreased.50 These bacteria are known to increase the production of the short-chain fatty acid butyrate, which has multiple known functions in maintaining gastrointestinal homeostasis, including, promoting regulatory T-cell differentiation,51,52 suppressing inflammation by inhibiting nuclear-factor-kappa B activity,53 and enhancing epithelial tight-junction assembly.54

In CKD patients, impaired kidney function and alteration in the gastrointestinal microbiota contributes to increased levels of the microbiota-dependent metabolite trimethylamine N-oxide (TMAO).44,55 Circulating TMAO is also a marker of renal damage.56 Indeed, this has been demonstrated by urine TMAO levels in a pediatric cohort of CKD patients, which was also correlated with a decreased abundance of Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium in the gastrointestinal tract. Furthermore, children in this cohort with abnormal blood pressure had a lower abundance of Prevotella.57

Progression of CKD also has deleterious effects on the gastrointestinal tract.58,59,60 CKD increases urease and uricase-producing bacteria, which in turn, raises the levels of the toxins urea and uric acid.61 Increased uremic toxin concentrations have been shown to drive dysbiosis of the gastrointestinal microbiota and contribute to CKD progression.62,63 Furthermore, ammonia, metabolized from urea by microbial urease, can damage the epithelial barrier in the gastrointestinal tract, enabling the release of gastrointestinal-derived uremic toxins.64,65

Although the underlying mechanism of gastrointestinal dysbiosis in CKD remains to be fully elucidated, there is emerging evidence for a link between the gastrointestinal microbiota and microbial metabolites, specifically associated with the degree and progression of the disease.

Neurogenic bladder

Neurogenic bladder is a bladder dysfunction disorder caused by damage to the nervous system. Damage to the nerve cells in neurogenic bladder disorder may be a risk factor for bacteriuria.66,67,68,69,70 The role of the microbiome in the neurogenic bladder has been reviewed.71 Unlike healthy individuals,72 increased microbial diversity precedes the onset of UTI in neuropathic bladder patients.73 A pilot study by Forster et al. found that children with neuropathic bladder disorder have urinary microbiomes that are predominantly composed of the Enterobacteriaceae family.74 Other studies have also identified that the urinary microbiome of patients with neuropathic bladder consists of uropathogens, such as Enterococcus, Klebsiella, and Pseudomonas compared to non-uropathogenic bacteria identified in the urinary microbiome of people without a neurogenic bladder.71,72,75 Further studies investigating the impact of specific site microbiota on the severity of neurogenic bladder is warranted.

Recurrent urinary tract infection

The role of the healthy urinary microbiome in maintaining bladder homeostasis and preventing rUTI is an emerging field.76,77 It is known that the bladder of healthy individuals harbors non-uropathogenic bacteria, such as Lactobacillus, which are thought to be protective against rUTI.17,25,78,79,80

A proportion of rUTI are thought to result from intracellular colonization by UPEC.81 Intracellular UPEC colonies are found within the bladder wall of mice and humans.82,83,84 In mice these intracellular colonies are dependent on both mouse strain and the strain of UPEC. Transient exposure of the bladder to vaginal G. vaginalis was associated with the release of uropathogenic bacteria from intracellular colonies in the bladder epithelium through exfoliation of the bladder mucosa resulting in reactivation and rUTI.24 G. vaginalis was also associated more commonly with women with overactive bladder syndrome, than healthy controls.13 In animal models, the link between a fecal load of UPEC and rUTI is relatively well established.85,86,87 However, in humans, UPEC appears to be present in abundant quantities in the feces but, its direct causal relationship to rUTI in women is far from established.88

Catheter-associated UTI (CAUTI) are a growing problem in patients of all ages, particularly in patients with underlying urological diseases. The involvement of the microbiome in CAUTI has been recently reviewed.89 A more detailed investigation of catheter-induced changes to the urinary microbiome is warranted.

Although the relationship between the gastrointestinal microbiome and UTI in adults continues to be studied90 equivalent data on the impact of the genitourinary microbiome in the early years of life and changes through puberty are scant.91 rUTI is a common issue in girls with bladder bowel dysfunction and/or vesicoureteral reflux.92,93 The presence of UPEC in feces, as well as the formation of intracellular colonies in the bladder epithelium, have been reported to contribute to rUTI in children similar to adult women.92 Interestingly, aggressive treatment of constipation has a proven beneficial effect, although the mechanisms underpinning this remain uncertain.91 Microbiome-based studies focusing on better diagnosis and treatment need to be pursued in children to reduce morbidity due to overzealous antibiotic use and emerging antimicrobial resistance.

In line with a more advanced understanding of disease manifestation and improved treatment options, the ability to accurately detect infections is essential. Mouraviev and associates applied a next-generation DNA sequencing-based diagnostic algorithm (DecodEX) for detection and targeted antimicrobial treatment in males with neurogenic bladder or chronic prostatitis.94 In phase II clinical study on men with chronic prostatitis, acute UTI, or chronic UTI, the diagnostic yield with DecodEX was 100% (44/44) while it was 29.5% (13/44) with the traditional urine culture test. In summary, an improved understanding of the genitourinary microbiota has provided us with a new lens to look through to address the important issue of rUTI in women, men, and children. Combining emerging microbiome technologies and bacteriotherapy with existing diagnostics and treatment strategies may offer new strategies for the management of rUTI.

Tools for improved assessment of the urinary microbiome

Urine microbial culturing

Prior to the recent understanding of the urinary microbiome, the gold-standard urine culture test developed in the 1950s was the common procedure performed to determine the presence of a UTI. Uropathogens such as UPEC, Enterococcus, and Staphylococcus spp. in urine samples were enumerated on agar plates, and colony counts of >104 colony forming units (CFU)/mL was considered a positive test.7 Despite the complexity of the urinary microbiota being relatively well understood it remains unclear whether standard microbial culturing methods are adequate to capture species diversity or even sufficient to detect the presence of all UTIs.7,22 These findings highlight several challenges when exploring the urinary microbiome in health and disease states. Furthermore, the low-microbial biomass of the urinary microbiota (<105 CFU/mL) combined with the difficulty in isolating native health commensals and uropathogens that may require specific culture conditions emphasizes the need for better tools to gain advancement in the field.7,22

The expanded quantitative urine culture (EQUC) was developed to enable the detection of previously unculturable bacteria or uropathogens that exist in low abundance.6,7 EQUC confirmed that urine contains viable bacteria that comprise the female urinary microbiome,7 and was able to detect 84% of all uropathogens in symptomatic patients, whilst conventional culturing was limited to 33% detection.6 This method has been adapted for streamlined use in clinical laboratories.6 Furthermore, multiple sequencing tools have been performed to further characterize the urinary microbiome to achieve in-depth sample and phylogenic resolution (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1: Improved characterization of the urinary microbiome using culturing and sequencing tools.
figure1

In-depth functional and genomic characterization of the urinary microbiome can be achieved with tools and technologies that help improve sample resolution and phylogenetic resolution. Traditional microbial culturing by quantifying bacterial numbers on agar plates is now considered an inadequate approach to detect the presence of UTI due to the limited sample resolution that traditional microbial culturing can achieve. The expanded quantitative urine culture (EQUC) method is an improved microbial culturing technique that enables the detection of low abundance uropathogens and is the preferred method for routine UTI testing in clinical laboratories. EQUC can be combined with sequencing tools to further characterize the microbiota and enable an expanded reference genome database. Amplicon sequencing of 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene regions allows the taxonomic identification of microbial communities without the need for microbial culturing. Clonal typing of bacterial species within a sample can be achieved with targeted amplicon sequencing. Sequences from the entire genome can be characterized by metagenomic sequencing, which enables the characterization of the microbiome at a genomic and functional level. Long-read sequencing can improve whole-genome sequencing methods when assembling sequence reads. Using integrated multi-omics approaches can enhance the understanding of host-microbe interactions and functions. These culturing and sequencing methods could be integrated to improve the reference database and enable isolate banking from samples.

Whole-genome sequencing

Detailed measurements of individual bacterial isolates can be achieved by combining culturing with whole-genome sequencing (Fig. 1). The complete genome sequence can be used to detect gene contents, genetic mutations, and genomic rearrangements. Assembling sequence reads into complete genome sequences can be challenged by the presence of repetitive DNA regions, a problem that can be overcome by using long-read sequencing platforms.95,96,97 As long-read sequencing technologies still suffer from low sequencing yields and relatively high sequencing error rates, they are often combined with short sequence reads in hybrid de novo assemblies to produce high-quality reference genomes.98

Thomas-White et al. combined EQUC methods with whole-genome sequencing to characterize the phylogenetic diversity of bacteria from perimenopausal women with and without UTI.5 The authors were able to culture two-thirds of the genera detected by metagenomics, however, the anaerobes Actinobacteria, Firmicutes, and Bacteroidetes were not able to be isolated with the EQUC method alone.5 This highlights the synergistic relationship between the vaginal and urinary microbiome and the need to harness genome sequencing technologies to achieve the isolate-level resolution needed for further investigations into the host-microbial signature within these sites.

Amplicon sequencing

High-throughput sequencing of genetic markers amplified via polymerase chain reaction (known as amplicon sequencing or metabarcoding) is a sensitive and cost-effective method to achieve low-resolution measurement of the microbial composition of a sample without the need to culture bacterial isolates. As the urinary microbiome research field emerged, multiple studies utilized 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing for insight into the taxonomic composition of bacterial communities that were associated with urological disorders.8,11,13 Urgency urinary incontinence (UUI) has been associated with differences in urinary microbial community diversity and composition within the female urinary tract when compared with healthy controls.8,11,13 Treatment success rates against UUI in females with the anticholinergic drug solifinacin,11 and risk of post-operative infections99 have also been linked to the urinary microbiome, warranting further studies in this field.

However, the low microbial biomass in urine samples poses an additional challenge to adequately define the microbiome composition. To avoid introducing bias, various sample collection methods have been proposed (voided urine, transurethral catheter, and suprapubic aspiration).100 Sample collection can also be improved by the addition of a preservative (AssayAssure®) to conserve the microbial composition in single-voided urine samples from women.101 Importantly, collection and preservation methods for all specimens should be kept consistent across studies within the field to avoid confounders.102

Where particular species of interest are known, targeted amplicon sequencing can be applied. Shevchenko et al. used a novel high-throughput method for clonal typing of multidrug-resistant E. coli in fecal and urinary samples from women and developed an algorithm called population level-allele profiler, which enables the simultaneous identification of alleles and their prevalence in both fecal and urine samples.103 This method could potentially be adapted to clonal-type other bacterial species for future studies of population and transmission dynamics of the urinary microbiome; however, it is fundamentally dependent on pre-existing knowledge of the isolates of interest.

Despite the advances made in urinary microbiome research, 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing is often limited to family and genus level resolution (Fig. 1), presenting challenges to species-level identification, particularly in diverse polymicrobial samples, and offers no capacity to measure functional genes within the microbial community.104,105 Amplicon sequencing of the 16S rRNA can be complemented with EQUC to assess the microbial composition of culture-negative urine samples from healthy individuals.9,10 These studies confirmed the presence of a microbial community in the healthy urinary tract, including an array of microorganisms that would normally remain undetected by conventional methods such as Aerococcus uringe, Ureaplasma spp, and the genera Soehngenia.9,10

Metagenomic sequencing

Metagenomics is another culture-independent high-throughput sequencing method used to measure genetic material from microbes within a sample. Sequences from entire genomes within the genetic pool can be characterized at a higher taxonomic resolution and functional level (Fig. 1). This approach allows an in-depth analysis of the microbiome without inherent bias associated with specific genetic markers.

Community profiling using metagenomic sequencing in clinical samples could enhance the understanding of antibiotic resistance or virulence genes associated with uropathogens26,106,107 in addition to higher resolution characterization of community composition. Moustafa et al. used metagenomic sequencing to detect the novel uropathogens Ureaplasma, Alloscardovia, and Actinotignum, which normally exist in low abundance in the urinary tract.12

In addition, the study identified eukaryotic fungal species (Candida spp) and the protozoan, Trichomonas vaginalis along with and viral organisms (e.g., Herpesvirus 6, human papillomavirus, polyomavirus), which would not be detected via 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing.12 A similar approach, known as metatranscriptomics, allows characterizing of the actively transcribed genes of the microbial population, which can help to understand the gene expression of potential pathogens. For example, metatranscriptomes of the vaginal microbiota have revealed that the pathogen responsible for bacterial vaginosis, G. vaginalis, can subvert the effects of antibiotic therapy by expressing DNA-repair genes.108 RNA-sequencing has been used to understand the expression of virulence genes in UPEC isolated from women with UTIs,109 but to our knowledge, this technique is yet to be applied to understand community-wide patterns in the urinary microbiome. Although sequencing the entire DNA content has advantages, high sequencing depth is typically required to enable de novo assembly, especially in complex microbial communities. In urine samples, which contain low microbial biomass, contaminating human DNA can also constitute a substantial proportion of the sequence data regularly rendering this approach cost-prohibitive. This limitation may be overcome by enriching bacterial DNA in a sample while depleting human DNA.110,111 Another strategy is to target cell-free DNA (cfDNA), which are single-stranded DNA fragments from dead cells, many of which are host-cell or microbial-derived. Metagenomic analysis of cfDNA is an emerging technology that could improve the precision of diagnostic screening for UTI and provide insight into urinary microbiome dynamics. Urinary cfDNA metagenomics has recently been utilized to detect and monitor UTI in kidney transplant recipients.112,113 However, whether cfDNA sequencing is an efficient tool to assess the urinary microbiome remains to be further investigated. The low-biomass of microbial-cfDNA may lead to a higher risk of DNA contamination from external sources, resulting in false-positive rates during analysis.114 Thus, these limitations should be considered when applying cfDNA technology for the assessment of the urinary microbiome.

Potential future treatment strategies targeting the urinary microbiota

The use of broad-spectrum antibiotics to treat urological disorders has led to the emergence of multi-antibiotic resistant uropathogens.15 Despite limited knowledge of the various factors that can modulate the urinary microbiota, multiple therapeutic approaches to promote microbiota restoration are now also being explored (Fig. 2).115,116 Switching from an eradication-of-infection approach to microbiota modulation or restoration may pave the way for more effective management strategies for urological diseases.

Fig. 2: Modulating the microbiota as a future intervention strategy for urological diseases.
figure2

Administration of broad-spectrum antibiotics is the mainstay treatment for recurrent UTI (rUTI). Prolonged exposure to antibiotics to eradicate infection has resulted in the development of multi-resistant uropathogens, which can disrupt the microbiome (dysbiosis), leading to an imbalance of native health commensals and uropathogens. Insight into the genitourinary and gastrointestinal microbiome has paved the way for potential therapeutics that target host-microbiome interactions in order to restore homeostasis by increasing commensals and reducing the uropathogenic population. Probiotics consisting of live Lactobacillus spp. can be orally administered to restore balance to the host microbiome following antibiotic exposure and has been widely implicated in gastrointestinal disorders. However, further validation of Lactobacillus probiotics in the context of urological disorders is essential. Multiple animal studies and patient trials have investigated establishing asymptomatic colonization of attenuated Escherichia coli to outcompete colonization of uropathogens. The same principle can be applied for catheterized patients, whereby catheters can be coated with attenuated E. coli isolates. Specific uropathogens such as uropathogenic E. coli (UPEC) can be genetically modified by targeting virulence and fitness genes that are essential for UPEC pathogenesis (e.g. fimbriae adhesins, pilus, biofilm formation machinery). These virulence factors can be directly inhibited by small synthetic molecular compounds such as mannosides, which functions as a fimbriae antagonist. The synergistic relationship between the female reproductive tract, urinary, and gastrointestinal tract can be harnessed to develop adequate microbiota transplantation (fecal microbiota transplant; FMT and vaginal microbiota transplant; VMT) and restoration. Modulating the host immune response by targeting host factors such as the cytokine interleukin-22 (IL-22), which has been shown to regulate commensal bacteria in the gastrointestinal and maintaining epithelial barrier integrity may also be an emerging form of therapy. However, the role of IL-22 in urological diseases should be fully characterized in future studies.

Biotherapeutics

Commercial probiotics are easily accessible and have become widely popular due to the benefits of promoting gastrointestinal microbiome health. Prophylactic probiotics have also been used to prevent gastrointestinal disorders such as antibiotic-associated diarrhea, colitis, and inflammatory bowel disease.117 Several benefits of probiotics include suppressing pathogen colonization,118 modulating host immunity,119 promoting cell proliferation,120 and maintaining epithelial barrier integrity.121,122,123,124 Bacterial strains have been evaluated for their probiotic properties to treat rUTI, bladder cancer, and kidney disease. In a randomized clinical phase II trial, the Lactobacillus crispatus probiotic (Lactin-V) administered via intravaginal suppository led to a significant reduction in rUTI.115 The protective mechanism of L. crispatus is mediated by the secretion of lactic acid, which has broader implications in the genital tract against Chlamydia trachomatis and Candida albicans infection.125,126,127 Further screening of Lactobacilli isolates from the vagina of healthy women identified potential candidates for probiotics, including L. rhamnosus, Lactobacillus helveticus, and Lactobacillus salivarius.128 However, a Cochrane review of nine studies with children and adult participants found no significant differences between placebo and probiotic groups in managing rUTI, although the variation of methods in these studies could be a confounding factor.129 Hence, there is a need to further assess the efficacy of Lactobacillus spp. as probiotics in bladder health, especially considering that the vaginal and urinary microbiome are interconnected.5 Whether one or multiple strains of commensal bacteria are required to confer protection and restore the urinary flora remains to be explored.

Treatment of rUTI with asymptomatic E. coli has been investigated in murine models and trialed with patients.130,131,132,133 Attenuated E. coli isolates with a mutation in the fimbrial adhesins, are able to rapidly establish asymptomatic long-term colonization in the urinary tract and outcompete colonization of uropathogens without activating host immune responses.131,132,134 Further studies with a larger cohort of patients and testing in immunocompromised individuals are required to further develop this form of therapy. Catheterized patients may benefit from E. coli HU2117 coated catheters, which was reported to lower incidence rates of UTI among subjects, although E. coli colonization in the urinary tract was not investigated in the study.135 E. coli could also be bioengineered to modulate bacterial-host interactions such as enhancing biofilm formation and mucin production on epithelial surfaces by targeting bacterial fimbriae.136

Microbiota transplantation and microbiome restoration

Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) has been used as an alternative approach for gastrointestinal microbiome restoration and increasing microbial diversity, particularly in patients with prolonged exposure to antibiotics.137 FMT in patients with UTI and recurrent Clostridium difficile infection was associated with a decrease in the colonization of antibiotic-resistant pathogens (e.g. vancomycin-resistant Enterococci)138 and an increase in antibiotic susceptibility of the uropathogens, E. coli, and Klebsiella.139 In another study, 16S rRNA profiling, and metagenomics were performed to assess the microbiome pre- and post-FMT in a patient with irritable bowel syndrome and rUTI.140 In the post-FMT stool sample, there was a reduction in pathogenic strains and 12 new strains that were not detected in the pre-FMT sample were identified.140 UTI symptoms in the treated group also did not reoccur 8-months following treatment.140 However, FMT has not been successful in eradicating all pathogens, and a randomized control trial on FMT post-antibiotic usage observed no significant differences in the decolonization of multi-drug resistant Enterobacteriaceae.141

The microbiome restoration therapy RBX2660 formulated for the prevention of recurrent C. difficile infection is a standardized broad-spectrum microbiota suspension manufactured from healthy stool donors which can be delivered directly to the intestinal tract and is undergoing Phase III clinical trials.142,143,144 To date, one case-study trialing RBX2660 to treat rUTI has been reported, however, the treatment failed to abrogate uropathogens and the patient continued experiencing rUTI following exposure to broad-spectrum antibiotics.145 It would be insightful to investigate the effectiveness of FMT and microbiome restoration therapies in managing diseases solely associated with the lower urinary tract because existing gastrointestinal disorders may have influenced the treatment success rate in this cohort.

The shared vaginal-urinary-microbial-axis could be a useful management strategy for UTI.5 Vaginal microbiota transplantation (VMT) has been trialed for recurrent bacterial vaginosis,146 however, the potential relevance of this treatment to UTI has not been explored. Indeed, alterations of the female urinary microbiome can be influenced by multiple factors such as age, hormonal status, and mode-of-delivery80,147 which are important considerations when implicating VMT for UTI. Perhaps microbiota transfer and microbiome restoration therapies could be optimized to contain synthetic communities of health-associated Lactobacilli that are known to mediate host-microbe interactions and maintain mucosal immune homeostasis in the genitourinary tract.

Bacterial inhibitors

One of the critical factors of UPEC pathogenesis is its ability to adhere to the urothelium, which is mediated by the binding interaction between the bacterial type I pilus FimH adhesin to mannosylated glycoproteins expressed on host epithelial cells in the bladder.148 Mannosides are a class of small molecular compounds that function as receptor analogs and bind to bacterial fimbriae to prevent UPEC-host cell interactions. The efficacy of mannosides in reducing bacterial burden in the kidney and bladder has been shown in murine infection models and ex vivo human kidney cells.149,150,151 In murine-models, mannosides have also been an effective preventative treatment measure for UPEC-associated CAUTI, including CAUTI caused by multi-drug resistant UPEC.151,152,153 Targeting FimH with mannosides can selectively deplete UPEC isolates that are genetically diverse in the gastrointestinal tract, and potentially reduce UTI incidence without disrupting the microbiota.87 The inhibitory function was observed across multiple genetic backgrounds in mice and was tested against different UPEC isolates.87

Emerging immunomodulatory therapies and microbiome mimetics

Although the distinct roles of the urinary microbiome have yet to be comprehensively defined, it is thought that the microbiota within this site is critical for homeostasis of the urinary tract, much like other mucosal regions such as the gastrointestinal and female reproductive tract.154 These protective functions likely include maintaining the epithelial barrier, outcompeting pathogens for metabolites, and modulating the host immune responses.155 The high presence of specific resident immune cell populations such as tissue-resident macrophages156 in the urinary tract may suggest the importance of host cell–microbial crosstalk in priming the immune response against infection.157 However, further exploration of microbial-mediated mechanisms of homeostasis in the urinary tract is warranted.

Antimicrobial peptides are amongst the first line of defense against uropathogens that invade the urinary tract following the breakdown of the mucus and epithelial barriers.158 Human bladder epithelial cells produce lactoferrins, which are iron-binding glycoproteins that drive neutrophil infiltration, resulting in lower bladder bacterial burden in a murine infection model.159 The cathelicidin family of antimicrobial peptides, LL-37, mediates T lymphocyte, macrophage, and neutrophil responses during UTI.160 Endogenous LL-37 activity in the urinary tract could be enhanced with the treatment of the synthetic antimicrobial, ceragenins, which could be an effective form of managing multi-drug resistant UPEC infection.161,162 A prolyl-hydroxylase inhibitor (GB-004, formerly known as AKB-4924), was proposed to regulate the transcriptional factor, hypoxia-inducible factor-1alpha (HIF-1α), thereby resulting in decreased bacterial burden coupled with a reduction in macrophage and neutrophil-mediated inflammation in a mouse model of UTI.163 The authors propose that GB-004 could be compatible with other therapies for rUTI, however, this will need to be evaluated further.163

During infection, activation of pattern-recognition receptors expressed on urothelial cells such as Toll-like receptors (TLRs) and NOD-like receptors (NLRs) bind to cognate microbial antigens that drive downstream signal transduction in cells, leading to secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines.164 Murine UPEC infection models have identified the innate immune sensors, TLR4,165,166 TLR5,167 and TLR11,168 and the pro-inflammatory chemokine CXCL12, as important in bacterial clearance and infiltration of natural-killer and T lymphocytes in the bladder,169 respectively. However, whether these findings can be implicated in human UTI, and their potential as diagnostic biomarkers or therapeutic targets remain to be investigated.

Screening of urine and plasma samples from UTI patients revealed an upregulation of tumor necrosis factor, interleukin (IL)-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-17 at both the transcript and protein levels.170 In addition, NLRP3, IL-1β, and tumor growth factor-β (TGF-β) mRNA levels have been associated with the microbial nutrient metabolite TMAO in the urine and plasma of CKD patients.55 The increased mRNA levels of the inflammasome components, NLRP3 and NLRC4, have previously been detected in UTI patients.171 These findings suggest the involvement of the microbiota in regulating adaptive cellular immune responses and inflammation during urological disorders.

IL-22 is a member of the IL-10 cytokine superfamily with multi-faceted functions in the gastrointestinal tract.172,173 The role of IL-22 in regulating commensal bacteria and modulating the expression of antimicrobial peptides in human urothelial cells174,175 may offer insight into the protective and immunoregulatory role of the interleukin during infection in the urinary tract. To date, clinical trial drugs targeting IL-22 have been developed to treat inflammatory diseases such as psoriasis and rheumatoid arthritis.176,177 With further studies, immunomodulatory therapies that inhibit or enhance IL-22 or other host immune receptors or cytokines/chemokines could potentially be applied to manage inflammation and/or control bacterial colonization during urological disorders.178

Despite the activation of innate and adaptive immune responses during infection, rUTI remains a significant burden in human health. It is unclear how the adaptive and humoral immune response plays a role during repeated infection and whether the mechanisms of immune memory breakdown, resulting in recurrent infections. Furthering our understanding of immune memory after UTI could advance the development of effective vaccines to target the humoral and adaptive immune response. Multi-subunit vaccines composed of UPEC antigens (e.g., fimbriae, hemolysin, and siderophore receptor) have been proposed as effective candidates in raising protective antibody titer levels in mouse models, however, the authors were unable to speculate whether this approach would be protective in patients.179 A tetravalent bioconjugate vaccine, ExPEC4V, that targets the O-antigen of extraintestinal pathogenic E. coli lipopolysaccharide, showed promising results in a clinical phase 1b trial, and effectiveness was shown for rUTI in women.180 Multi-strain vaginal mucosal vaccines (Urovac, Urostim, and Urvakol) have also been developed, but validation in human trials will need to be performed. The sublingual spray vaccine, Uromune, which consists of heat-inactivated whole bacterial lysates composing of uropathogens such as E. coli, Enterococcus faecalis, Klebsiella pneumonia, and Proteus vulgaris181 have also been trialed in women with UTI. Compared to women that were treated with antibiotics, less than 10% of the immunized group developed UTI within 12 months post-vaccination. However, further studies are needed to evaluate these results.182

Conclusions and perspectives

Our expanding knowledge of the urinary, gastrointestinal, and vaginal microbiomes and their roles in both homeostatic and disease conditions in the urinary tract provides a significant opportunity for microbiome-derived therapeutic interventions in conditions ranging from AKI and CKD to rUTI. However, the development and application of these therapeutic interventions are dependent on a rationalized application of emerging technologies and improved understanding of these systems at both the local and systemic level.

Emerging -omics technologies and microbial culturing have complemented one another in advancing our understanding of the urinary microbiome.5 Metabolomics, metaproteomics, and metatranscriptomics could be integrated in the workflow for specific assessment of patient cohorts and may enhance current diagnostic approaches. The application of genome-guided metagenomics, used commonly in the study of the gastrointestinal tract, integrates these approaches to enable causative validations of health and disease-associated genes within bacterial genomes183 or between mucosal sites.5

While metagenomic analysis allows prediction of functional capacity, combination with transcriptomics to determine the response, and metabolomics to determine function is required. Genome-wide immune associations of the bladder transcriptome could be further investigated to identify host and bacterial markers to control infection. At the functional level, the investigation of polymicrobial communities can identify synergistic relationships during health and disease. For example, iron-uptake of UPEC is induced by a metabolic product from E. faecalis,184 and urinary tract commensals such as the genera Lactobacillus, Streptococcus, and Bifidobacterium are known to metabolize the extracellular glycosaminoglycan layer which coats the host urothelium.185 Identifying the metabolic activities or microbiome-products could provide further insight into potential targets for treatment. Indeed, these -omics approaches offer distinctly invaluable information, combining these tools in future analyses could shed light on the human host and urinary microbiome.

To develop targeted therapies, it is essential to integrate the knowledge of microbiome genomics, transcriptomics, and functional capacity with host state and response; however, the host immune responses to the urinary microbiome has not been well defined. Application of genetically-engineered murine models, 3D organoid culture,186 or microfluidic organ-on-a-chip models187 in combination with sequencing tools such as single-cell sequencing,188,189 metagenomics and -omics approaches will prove essential in the advancement of this field. A focus on the application of emerging microbiome technologies to the urinary microbiome has the potential to revolutionize the treatment of UTI or related complications of the lower urinary tract and could offer insight into the development of novel therapeutics and intervention strategies.

References

  1. 1.

    Cho, I. & Blaser, M. J. The human microbiome: at the interface of health and disease. Nat. Rev. Genet. 13, 260–270 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Browne, H. P. et al. Culturing of ‘unculturable’ human microbiota reveals novel taxa and extensive sporulation. Nature 533, 543–546 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Forster, S. C. et al. A human gut bacterial genome and culture collection for improved metagenomic analyses. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 186–192 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Almeida, A. et al. A new genomic blueprint of the human gut microbiota. Nature 568, 499–504 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Thomas-White, K. et al. Culturing of female bladder bacteria reveals an interconnected urogenital microbiota. Nat. Commun. 9, 1557 (2018).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Price, T. K. et al. The clinical urine culture: enhanced techniques improve detection of clinically relevant microorganisms. J. Clin. Microbiol. 54, 1216–1222 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Hilt, E. E. et al. Urine is not sterile: use of enhanced urine culture techniques to detect resident bacterial flora in the adult female bladder. J. Clin. Microbiol. 52, 871–876 (2014).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Karstens, L. et al. Does the urinary microbiome play a role in urgency urinary incontinence and its severity? Front. Cell Infect. Microbiol. 6, 78 (2016).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Lewis, D. et al. The human urinary microbiome; bacterial DNA in voided urine of asymptomatic adults. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 3, 41 (2013).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Siddiqui, H., Nederbragt, A. J., Lagesen, K., Jeansson, S. L. & Jakobsen, K. S. Assessing diversity of the female urine microbiota by high throughput sequencing of 16S rDNA amplicons. BMC Microbiol. 11, 244 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Thomas-White, K. J. et al. Incontinence medication response relates to the female urinary microbiota. Int. Urogynecol. J. 27, 723–733 (2016).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Moustafa, A. et al. Microbial metagenome of urinary tract infection. Sci. Rep. 8, 4333 (2018).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Pearce, M. M. et al. The female urinary microbiome: a comparison of women with and without urgency urinary incontinence. mBio 5, e01283–01214 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Hooton, T. M., Roberts, P. L., Cox, M. E. & Stapleton, A. E. Voided midstream urine culture and acute cystitis in premenopausal women. N. Engl. J. Med. 369, 1883–1891 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Malik, R. D., Wu, Y. R., Christie, A. L., Alhalabi, F. & Zimmern, P. E. Impact of allergy and resistance on antibiotic selection for recurrent urinary tract infections in older women. Urology 113, 26–33 (2018).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Waller, T. A., Pantin, S. A. L., Yenior, A. L. & Pujalte, G. G. Urinary tract infection antibiotic resistance in the United States. Prim. Care 45, 455–466 (2018).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Klein, R. D. & Hultgren, S. J. Urinary tract infections: microbial pathogenesis, host-pathogen interactions and new treatment strategies. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 18, 211–226 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Nielsen, K. L. et al. Whole-genome comparison of urinary pathogenic Escherichia coli and faecal isolates of UTI patients and healthy controls. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 307, 497–507 (2017).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Magruder, M. et al. Gut uropathogen abundance is a risk factor for development of bacteriuria and urinary tract infection. Nat. Commun. 10, 5521 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Thanert, R. et al. Comparative genomics of antibiotic-resistant uropathogens implicates three routes for recurrence of urinary tract infections. mBio 10, e01977–19 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Lewis, A. L. & Gilbert, N. M. Roles of the vagina and the vaginal microbiota in urinary tract infection: evidence from clinical correlations and experimental models. GMS Infect. Dis. 8, Doc02 (2020).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Wolfe, A. J. et al. Evidence of uncultivated bacteria in the adult female bladder. J. Clin. Microbiol. 50, 1376–1383 (2012).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Komesu, Y. M. et al. Defining the relationship between vaginal and urinary microbiomes. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 222, 154 e151–154 e110 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Gilbert, N. M., O’Brien, V. P. & Lewis, A. L. Transient microbiota exposures activate dormant Escherichia coli infection in the bladder and drive severe outcomes of recurrent disease. PLoS Pathog. 13, e1006238 (2017).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Gottschick, C. et al. The urinary microbiota of men and women and its changes in women during bacterial vaginosis and antibiotic treatment. Microbiome 5, 99 (2017).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Mulder, M. et al. The effect of antimicrobial drug use on the composition of the genitourinary microbiota in an elderly population. BMC Microbiol. 19, 9 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Troha, K. et al. Nephrocytes remove microbiota-derived peptidoglycan from systemic circulation to maintain immune homeostasis. Immunity 51, 625–637 e623 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Jansen, J. et al. Remote sensing and signaling in kidney proximal tubules stimulates gut microbiome-derived organic anion secretion. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 16105–16110 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Roje, B. et al. Microbiota alters urinary bladder weight and gene expression. Microorganisms 8, 421 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Scales, C. D. Jr., Smith, A. C., Hanley, J. M. & Saigal, C. S. Urologic diseases in America P. Prevalence of kidney stones in the United States. Eur. Urol. 62, 160–165 (2012).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Alelign, T. & Petros, B. Kidney stone disease: an update on current concepts. Adv. Urol. 2018, 3068365 (2018).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Hatch, M. Gut microbiota and oxalate homeostasis. Ann. Transl. Med. 5, 36 (2017).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Stern, J. M. et al. Fecal transplant modifies urine chemistry risk factors for urinary stone disease. Physiol. Rep. 7, e14012 (2019).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Miller, A. W., Dale, C. & Dearing, M. D. The induction of oxalate metabolism in vivo is more effective with functional microbial communities than with functional microbial species. mSystems 2, e00088–17 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Miller, A. W., Orr, T., Dearing, D. & Monga, M. Loss of function dysbiosis associated with antibiotics and high fat, high sugar diet. ISME J. 13, 1379–1390 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Ticinesi, A. et al. Understanding the gut-kidney axis in nephrolithiasis: an analysis of the gut microbiota composition and functionality of stone formers. Gut 67, 2097–2106 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Miller, A. W., Choy, D., Penniston, K. L. & Lange, D. Inhibition of urinary stone disease by a multi-species bacterial network ensures healthy oxalate homeostasis. Kidney Int. 96, 180–188 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Liu, F. et al. Characteristics of the urinary microbiome in kidney stone patients with hypertension. J. Transl. Med 18, 130 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Zampini, A., Nguyen, A. H., Rose, E., Monga, M. & Miller, A. W. Defining dysbiosis in patients with urolithiasis. Sci. Rep. 9, 5425 (2019).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Cameron, G. J. M. et al. Emerging therapeutic potential of group 2 innate lymphoid cells in acute kidney injury. J. Pathol. 248, 9–15 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Emal, D. et al. Depletion of gut microbiota protects against renal ischemia-reperfusion injury. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 28, 1450–1461 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Nakade, Y. et al. Gut microbiota-derived D-serine protects against acute kidney injury. JCI Insight 3, e97957 (2018).

    PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Human Microbiome Project C. A framework for human microbiome research. Nature 486, 215–221 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Tomlinson, J. A. P. & Wheeler, D. C. The role of trimethylamine N-oxide as a mediator of cardiovascular complications in chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int. 92, 809–815 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Chronic Kidney Disease Prognosis, C. et al. Association of estimated glomerular filtration rate and albuminuria with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in general population cohorts: a collaborative meta-analysis. Lancet 375, 2073–2081 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Go, A. S., Chertow, G. M., Fan, D., McCulloch, C. E. & Hsu, C. Y. Chronic kidney disease and the risks of death, cardiovascular events, and hospitalization. N. Engl. J. Med. 351, 1296–1305 (2004).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Fiorentino, M. et al. Updates on urinary tract infections in kidney transplantation. J. Nephrol. 32, 751–761 (2019).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Vaziri, N. D., Yuan, J. & Norris, K. Role of urea in intestinal barrier dysfunction and disruption of epithelial tight junction in chronic kidney disease. Am. J. Nephrol. 37, 1–6 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Ramezani, A. & Raj, D. S. The gut microbiome, kidney disease, and targeted interventions. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 25, 657–670 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Jiang, S. et al. Alteration of the gut microbiota in Chinese population with chronic kidney disease. Sci. Rep. 7, 2870 (2017).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Sun, M. et al. Microbiota-derived short-chain fatty acids promote Th1 cell IL-10 production to maintain intestinal homeostasis. Nat Commun 9, 3555 (2018).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Bhaskaran, N. et al. Role of Short Chain Fatty Acids in Controlling Tregs and Immunopathology During Mucosal Infection. Front. Microbiol. 9 (1995). https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.01995.

  53. 53.

    Machado, R. A. et al. Sodium butyrate decreases the activation of NF-κB reducing inflammation and oxidative damage in the kidney of rats subjected to contrast-induced nephropathy. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 27(8), 3136–3140 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Tabat, M. W. et al. Acute Effects of Butyrate on Induced Hyperpermeability and Tight Junction Protein Expression in Human Colonic Tissues. Biomolecules. 10, 766 (2020). Published 2020 May 14.

    CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    El-Deeb, O. S., Atef, M. M. & Hafez, Y. M. The interplay between microbiota-dependent metabolite trimethylamine N-oxide, Transforming growth factor beta/SMAD signaling and inflammasome activation in chronic kidney disease patients: a new mechanistic perspective. J. Cell. Biochem. 120, 14476–14485 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Subramaniam, S. & Fletcher, C. Trimethylamine N-oxide: breathe new life. Br. J. Pharm. 175, 1344–1353 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Hsu, C. N. et al. Gut microbiota-dependent trimethylamine N-oxide pathway associated with cardiovascular risk in children with early-stage chronic kidney disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 19, 3699 (2018).

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Bammens, B., Verbeke, K., Vanrenterghem, Y. & Evenepoel, P. Evidence for impaired assimilation of protein in chronic renal failure. Kidney Int. 64, 2196–2203 (2003).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Evenepoel P., Meijers B. K., Bammens B. R. & Verbeke K. Uremic toxins originating from colonic microbial metabolism. Kidney Int. Suppl. S12–S19 (2009).

  60. 60.

    Hoibian, E., Florens, N., Koppe, L., Vidal, H. & Soulage, C. O. Distal colon motor dysfunction in mice with chronic kidney disease: putative role of uremic toxins. Toxins 10, 204 (2018).

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Wong, J. et al. Expansion of urease- and uricase-containing, indole- and p-cresol-forming and contraction of short-chain fatty acid-producing intestinal microbiota in ESRD. Am. J. Nephrol. 39, 230–237 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Lau, W. L., Savoj, J., Nakata, M. B. & Vaziri, N. D. Altered microbiome in chronic kidney disease: systemic effects of gut-derived uremic toxins. Clin. Sci. 132, 509–522 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Mahmoodpoor, F., Rahbar Saadat, Y., Barzegari, A., Ardalan, M. & Zununi Vahed, S. The impact of gut microbiota on kidney function and pathogenesis. Biomed. Pharmacother. 93, 412–419 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Vaziri, N. D. et al. Uremic plasma impairs barrier function and depletes the tight junction protein constituents of intestinal epithelium. Am. J. Nephrol. 36, 438–443 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Vaziri, N. D. et al. Chronic kidney disease alters intestinal microbial flora. Kidney Int. 83, 308–315 (2013).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Fung, T. C., Olson, C. A. & Hsiao, E. Y. Interactions between the microbiota, immune and nervous systems in health and disease. Nat. Neurosci. 20, 145–155 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Mukai, S. et al. Retrospective study for risk factors for febrile UTI in spinal cord injury patients with routine concomitant intermittent catheterization in outpatient settings. Spinal Cord 54, 69–72 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Storme, O., Tiran Saucedo, J., Garcia-Mora, A., Dehesa-Davila, M. & Naber, K. G. Risk factors and predisposing conditions for urinary tract infection. Ther. Adv. Urol. 11, 1756287218814382 (2019).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Vigil, H. R. & Hickling, D. R. Urinary tract infection in the neurogenic bladder. Transl. Androl. Urol. 5, 72–87 (2016).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Wallace, D. J. et al. Spinal cord injury and the human microbiome: beyond the brain-gut axis. Neurosurg. Focus 46, E11 (2019).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Forster, C. S. & Pohl, H. Diagnosis of urinary tract infection in the neuropathic bladder: changing the paradigm to include the microbiome. Top. Spinal Cord. Inj. Rehabil. 25, 222–227 (2019).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Fouts, D. E. et al. Integrated next-generation sequencing of 16S rDNA and metaproteomics differentiate the healthy urine microbiome from asymptomatic bacteriuria in neuropathic bladder associated with spinal cord injury. J. Transl. Med. 10, 174 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Horwitz, D. et al. Decreased microbiota diversity associated with urinary tract infection in a trial of bacterial interference. J. Infect. 71, 358–367 (2015).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Forster, C. S. et al. A cross-sectional analysis of the urine microbiome of children with neuropathic bladders. J. Pediatr. Urol. 16, 593.e1–593.e8 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Groah, S. L. et al. Redefining healthy urine: a cross-sectional exploratory metagenomic study of people with and without bladder dysfunction. J. Urol. 196, 579–587 (2016).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Neugent, M. L., Hulyalkar, N. V., Nguyen, V. H., Zimmern, P. E. & De Nisco, N. J. Advances in understanding the human urinary microbiome and its potential role in urinary tract infection. mBio 11, e00218–20 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Harding, C. et al. How can we improve investigation, prevention and treatment for recurrent urinary tract infections—ICI-RS 2018. Neurourol. Urodyn. 38 Suppl 5, S90–S97 (2019).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  78. 78.

    Falagas, M. E., Betsi, G. I., Tokas, T. & Athanasiou, S. Probiotics for prevention of recurrent urinary tract infections in women: a review of the evidence from microbiological and clinical studies. Drugs 66, 1253–1261 (2006).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    Thomas-White, K. et al. Culturing of female bladder bacteria reveals an interconnected urogenital microbiota. Nat. Commun. 9, 1–7 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  80. 80.

    Brubaker, L. & Wolfe, A. J. The female urinary microbiota, urinary health and common urinary disorders. Ann. Transl. Med. 5, 34 (2017).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  81. 81.

    O’Brien, V. P. et al. A mucosal imprint left by prior Escherichia coli bladder infection sensitizes to recurrent disease. Nat. Microbiol. 2, 16196 (2016).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  82. 82.

    Hannan, T. J., Mysorekar, I. U., Hung, C. S., Isaacson-Schmid, M. L. & Hultgren, S. J. Early severe inflammatory responses to uropathogenic E. coli predispose to chronic and recurrent urinary tract infection. PLoS Pathog. 6, e1001042 (2010).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  83. 83.

    De Nisco, N. J. et al. Direct Detection of tissue-resident bacteria and chronic inflammation in the bladder wall of postmenopausal women with recurrent urinary tract infection. J. Mol. Biol. 431, 4368–4379 (2019).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  84. 84.

    Rosen, D. A., Hooton, T. M., Stamm, W. E., Humphrey, P. A. & Hultgren, S. J. Detection of intracellular bacterial communities in human urinary tract infection. PLoS Med. 4, e329 (2007).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  85. 85.

    Forsyth, V. S. et al. Rapid growth of uropathogenic Escherichia coli during human urinary tract infection. mBio 9, e00186–18 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  86. 86.

    Schilling, J. D., Lorenz, R. G. & Hultgren, S. J. Effect of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole on recurrent bacteriuria and bacterial persistence in mice infected with uropathogenic Escherichia coli. Infect. Immun. 70, 7042–7049 (2002).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  87. 87.

    Spaulding, C. N. et al. Selective depletion of uropathogenic E. coli from the gut by a FimH antagonist. Nature 546, 528–532 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  88. 88.

    Chen, S. L. et al. Genomic diversity and fitness of E. coli strains recovered from the intestinal and urinary tracts of women with recurrent urinary tract infection. Sci. Transl. Med. 5, 184ra160 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  89. 89.

    Majeed, A. et al. Does antimicrobial coating and impregnation of urinary catheters prevent catheter-associated urinary tract infection? A review of clinical and preclinical studies. Expert Rev. Med. Devices 16, 809–820 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  90. 90.

    Brubaker, L. & Wolfe, A. J. The new world of the urinary microbiota in women. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 213, 644–649 (2015).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  91. 91.

    Gerber, D., Forster, C. S. & Hsieh, M. The role of the genitourinary microbiome in pediatric urology: a review. Curr. Urol. Rep. 19, 13 (2018).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  92. 92.

    Shaikh, N. et al. Recurrent urinary tract infections in children with bladder and bowel dysfunction. Pediatrics 137, e20152982 (2016).

    PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  93. 93.

    Yang, S. et al. Diagnosis and management of bladder bowel dysfunction in children with urinary tract infections: a position statement from the International Children’s Continence Society. Pediatr. Nephrol. 33, 2207–2219 (2018).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  94. 94.

    Mouraviev, V. & McDonald, M. An implementation of next generation sequencing for prevention and diagnosis of urinary tract infection in urology. Can. J. Urol. 25, 9349–9356 (2018).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  95. 95.

    Huson, D. H. et al. MEGAN-LR: new algorithms allow accurate binning and easy interactive exploration of metagenomic long reads and contigs. Biol. Direct 13, 6 (2018).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  96. 96.

    Jain, C., Dilthey, A., Koren, S., Aluru, S. & Phillippy, A. M. A fast approximate algorithm for mapping long reads to large reference databases. J. Comput. Biol. 25, 766–779 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  97. 97.

    Arumugam, K. et al. Annotated bacterial chromosomes from frame-shift-corrected long-read metagenomic data. Microbiome 7, 61 (2019).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  98. 98.

    De Maio, N. et al. Comparison of long-read sequencing technologies in the hybrid assembly of complex bacterial genomes. Microb. Genom. 5, e000294 (2019).

    PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  99. 99.

    Pearce, M. M. et al. The female urinary microbiome in urgency urinary incontinence. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 213, 347.e341–311 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  100. 100.

    Karstens, L. et al. Community profiling of the urinary microbiota: considerations for low-biomass samples. Nat. Rev. Urol. 15, 735–749 (2018).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  101. 101.

    Jung, C. E. et al. Benchmarking urine storage and collection conditions for evaluating the female urinary microbiome. Sci. Rep. 9, 13409 (2019).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  102. 102.

    Hourigan, S. K. et al. Studying the urine microbiome in superficial bladder cancer: samples obtained by midstream voiding versus cystoscopy. BMC Urol. 20, 5 (2020).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  103. 103.

    Shevchenko, S. G., Radey, M., Tchesnokova, V., Kisiela, D. & Sokurenko, E. V. Escherichia coli clonobiome: assessing the strain diversity in feces and urine by deep amplicon sequencing. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 85, e01866–01819 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  104. 104.

    Deurenberg, R. H. et al. Application of next generation sequencing in clinical microbiology and infection prevention. J. Biotechnol. 243, 16–24 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  105. 105.

    Ragupathi, N. D., Sethuvel, D. M., Inbanathan, F. & Veeraraghavan, B. Accurate differentiation of Escherichia coli and Shigella serogroups: challenges and strategies. New Microbes New Infect. 21, 58–62 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  106. 106.

    Hasman, H. et al. Rapid whole-genome sequencing for detection and characterization of microorganisms directly from clinical samples. J. Clin. Microbiol. 52, 139 (2014).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  107. 107.

    Barraud, O. et al. Shotgun metagenomics for microbiome and resistome detection in septic patients with urinary tract infection. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 54, 803–808 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  108. 108.

    Deng, Z.-L. et al. Metatranscriptome analysis of the vaginal microbiota reveals potential mechanisms for protection against metronidazole in bacterial vaginosis. mSphere 3, e00262–00218 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  109. 109.

    Hagan, E. C., Lloyd, A. L., Rasko, D. A., Faerber, G. J. & Mobley, H. L. Escherichia coli global gene expression in urine from women with urinary tract infection. PLoS Pathog. 6, e1001187 (2010).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  110. 110.

    Marotz, C. A. et al. Improving saliva shotgun metagenomics by chemical host DNA depletion. Microbiome 6, 42 (2018).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  111. 111.

    Hasan, M. R. et al. Depletion of human DNA in spiked clinical specimens for improvement of sensitivity of pathogen detection by next-generation sequencing. J. Clin. Microbiol. 54, 919–927 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  112. 112.

    Burnham, P. et al. Urinary cell-free DNA is a versatile analyte for monitoring infections of the urinary tract. Nat. Commun. 9, 2412 (2018).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  113. 113.

    Cheng, A. P. et al. A cell-free DNA metagenomic sequencing assay that integrates the host injury response to infection. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 18738–18744 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  114. 114.

    Burnham, P. et al. Separating the signal from the noise in metagenomic cell-free DNA sequencing. Microbiome 8, 18 (2020).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  115. 115.

    Stapleton, A. E. et al. Randomized, placebo-controlled phase 2 trial of a Lactobacillus crispatus probiotic given intravaginally for prevention of recurrent urinary tract infection. Clin. Infect. Dis. 52, 1212–1217 (2011).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  116. 116.

    Lev-Sagie, A. et al. Vaginal microbiome transplantation in women with intractable bacterial vaginosis. Nat. Med. 25, 1500–1504 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  117. 117.

    Kim, S.-K. et al. Role of probiotics in human gut microbiome-associated diseases. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 29, 1335–1340 (2019).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  118. 118.

    Tkhruni, F. N., Aghajanyan, A. E., Balabekyan, T. R., Khachatryan, T. V. & Karapetyan, K. J. Characteristic of bacteriocins of Lactobacillus rhamnosus BTK 20-12 potential probiotic strain. Probiot. Antimicrob. Proteins 12, 716–724 (2020).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  119. 119.

    van Hemert, S. et al. Identification of Lactobacillus plantarum genes modulating the cytokine response of human peripheral blood mononuclear cells. BMC Microbiol. 10, 293 (2010).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  120. 120.

    Yan, F. et al. Soluble proteins produced by probiotic bacteria regulate intestinal epithelial cell survival and growth. Gastroenterology 132, 562–575 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  121. 121.

    La Fata, G., Weber, P. & Mohajeri, M. H. Probiotics and the gut immune system: indirect regulation. Probiot. Antimicrob. Proteins 10, 11–21 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  122. 122.

    Hsieh, C. Y. et al. Strengthening of the intestinal epithelial tight junction by Bifidobacterium bifidum. Physiol. Rep. 3, e12327 (2015).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  123. 123.

    Johnson-Henry, K. C., Hagen, K. E., Gordonpour, M., Tompkins, T. A. & Sherman, P. M. Surface-layer protein extracts from Lactobacillus helveticus inhibit enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7 adhesion to epithelial cells. Cell Microbiol. 9, 356–367 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  124. 124.

    Valdes-Varela, L., Alonso-Guervos, M., Garcia-Suarez, O., Gueimonde, M. & Ruas-Madiedo, P. Screening of bifidobacteria and lactobacilli able to antagonize the cytotoxic effect of Clostridium difficile upon intestinal epithelial HT29 monolayer. Front. Microbiol. 7, 577 (2016).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  125. 125.

    Amabebe, E. & Anumba, D. O. The vaginal microenvironment: the physiologic role of lactobacilli. Front. Med. 5, 181 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  126. 126.

    Edwards, V. L. et al. The cervicovaginal microbiota-host interaction modulates Chlamydia trachomatis infection. MBio 10, e01548–01519. (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  127. 127.

    Niu, X.-X., Li, T., Zhang, X., Wang, S.-X. & Liu, Z.-H. Lactobacillus crispatus modulates vaginal epithelial cell innate response to Candida albicans. Chin. Med. J. 130, 273 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  128. 128.

    Pino, A., Bartolo, E., Caggia, C., Cianci, A. & Randazzo, C. L. Detection of vaginal lactobacilli as probiotic candidates. Sci. Rep. 9, 3355 (2019).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  129. 129.

    Schwenger E. M., Tejani A. M. & Loewen P. S. Probiotics for preventing urinary tract infections in adults and children. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. Cd008772 (2015).

  130. 130.

    Rudick, C. N., Taylor, A. K., Yaggie, R. E., Schaeffer, A. J. & Klumpp, D. J. Asymptomatic bacteriuria Escherichia coli are live biotherapeutics for UTI. PLoS ONE 9, e109321 (2014).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  131. 131.

    Stork, C. et al. Characterization of asymptomatic bacteriuria escherichia coli isolates in search of alternative strains for efficient bacterial interference against uropathogens. Front. Microbiol. 9, 214 (2018).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  132. 132.

    Roos, V., Ulett, G. C., Schembri, M. A. & Klemm, P. The asymptomatic bacteriuria Escherichia coli strain 83972 outcompetes uropathogenic E. coli strains in human urine. Infect. Immun. 74, 615–624 (2006).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  133. 133.

    Sundén, F., Håkansson, L., Ljunggren, E. & Wullt, B. Escherichia coli 83972 bacteriuria protects against recurrent lower urinary tract infections in patients with incomplete bladder emptying. J. Urol. 184, 179–185 (2010).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  134. 134.

    Klemm, P., Roos, V., Ulett, G. C., Svanborg, C. & Schembri, M. A. Molecular characterization of the Escherichia coli asymptomatic bacteriuria strain 83972: the taming of a pathogen. Infect. Immun. 74, 781–785 (2006).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  135. 135.

    Trautner, B. W., Hull, R. A., Thornby, J. I. & Darouiche, R. O. Coating urinary catheters with an avirulent strain of Escherichia coli as a means to establish asymptomatic colonization. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 28, 92–94 (2007).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  136. 136.

    Duraj-Thatte, A. M., Praveschotinunt, P., Nash, T. R., Ward, F. R. & Joshi, N. S. Modulating bacterial and gut mucosal interactions with engineered biofilm matrix proteins. Sci. Rep. 8, 3475 (2018).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  137. 137.

    Suez, J. et al. Post-antibiotic gut mucosal microbiome reconstitution is impaired by probiotics and improved by autologous FMT. Cell 174, 1406–1423.e1416 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  138. 138.

    Amrane S. & Lagier J.-C. Fecal microbiota transplantation for antibiotic resistant bacteria decolonization. Hum. Microbiome J. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humic.2020.100071 (2020).

  139. 139.

    Tariq, R. et al. Fecal microbiota transplantation for recurrent Clostridium difficile infection reduces recurrent urinary tract infection frequency. Clin. Infect. Dis. 65, 1745–1747 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  140. 140.

    Hocquart, M. et al. Successful fecal microbiota transplantation in a patient suffering from irritable bowel syndrome and recurrent urinary tract infections. Open Forum Infect. Dis. 6, ofz398 (2019).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  141. 141.

    Huttner, B. D. et al. A 5-day course of oral antibiotics followed by faecal transplantation to eradicate carriage of multidrug-resistant Enterobacteriaceae: a randomized clinical trial. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 25, 830–838 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  142. 142.

    Blount, K. F., Shannon, W. D., Deych, E. & Jones, C. Restoration of bacterial microbiome composition and diversity among treatment responders in a phase 2 trial of RBX2660: an investigational microbiome restoration therapeutic. Open Forum Infect. Dis. 6, ofz095 (2019).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  143. 143.

    Dubberke, E. R. et al. Results from a randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial of a RBX2660-A Microbiota-Based drug for the prevention of recurrent Clostridium difficile infection. Clin. Infect. Dis. 67, 1198–1204 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  144. 144.

    Orenstein, R. et al. Safety and durability of RBX2660 (microbiota suspension) for recurrent Clostridium difficile infection: results of the PUNCH CD study. Clin. Infect. Dis. 62, 596–602 (2016).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  145. 145.

    Keen, E. C. et al. Microbiome restoration by RBX2660 does not preclude recurrence of multidrug-resistant urinary tract infection following subsequent antibiotic exposure: a case report. Open Forum Infect. Dis. 7, ofaa042 (2020).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  146. 146.

    Ma, D., Chen, Y. & Chen, T. Vaginal microbiota transplantation for the treatment of bacterial vaginosis: a conceptual analysis. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 366, fnz025 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  147. 147.

    Liu, F. et al. Alterations in the urinary microbiota are associated with cesarean delivery. Front. Microbiol. 9, 2193 (2018).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  148. 148.

    Terlizzi, M. E., Gribaudo, G. & Maffei, M. E. UroPathogenic Escherichia coli (UPEC) infections: virulence factors, bladder responses, antibiotic, and non-antibiotic antimicrobial strategies. Front. Microbiol. 8, 1566 (2017).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  149. 149.

    Mydock-McGrane, L. et al. Antivirulence C-mannosides as antibiotic-sparing, oral therapeutics for urinary tract infections. J. Med. Chem. 59, 9390–9408 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  150. 150.

    Kalas, V. et al. Structure-based discovery of glycomimetic FmlH ligands as inhibitors of bacterial adhesion during urinary tract infection. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, E2819 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  151. 151.

    Guiton, P. S. et al. Combinatorial small-molecule therapy prevents uropathogenic Escherichia coli catheter-associated urinary tract infections in mice. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 56, 4738–4745 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  152. 152.

    Cusumano, C. K. et al. Treatment and prevention of urinary tract infection with orally active FimH inhibitors. Sci. Transl. Med. 3, 109ra115 (2011).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  153. 153.

    Totsika, M. et al. A FimH inhibitor prevents acute bladder infection and treats chronic cystitis caused by multidrug-resistant uropathogenic Escherichia coli ST131. J. Infect. Dis. 208, 921–928 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  154. 154.

    Whiteside, S. A., Razvi, H., Dave, S., Reid, G. & Burton, J. P. The microbiome of the urinary tract—a role beyond infection. Nat. Rev. Urol. 12, 81–90 (2015).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  155. 155.

    Belkaid, Y. & Hand, T. W. Role of the microbiota in immunity and inflammation. Cell 157, 121–141 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  156. 156.

    Mora-Bau, G. et al. Macrophages subvert adaptive immunity to urinary tract infection. PLoS Pathog. 11, e1005044 (2015).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  157. 157.

    Schiwon, M. et al. Crosstalk between sentinel and helper macrophages permits neutrophil migration into infected uroepithelium. Cell 156, 456–468 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  158. 158.

    Chromek, M., Arvidsson, I. & Karpman, D. The antimicrobial peptide cathelicidin protects mice from Escherichia coli O157:H7-mediated disease. PLoS ONE 7, e46476 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  159. 159.

    Patras, K. A. et al. Augmentation of urinary lactoferrin enhances host innate immune clearance of uropathogenic Escherichia coli. J. Innate Immun. 11, 481–495 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  160. 160.

    De, Y. et al. LL-37, the neutrophil granule- and epithelial cell-derived cathelicidin, utilizes formyl peptide receptor-like 1 (FPRL1) as a receptor to chemoattract human peripheral blood neutrophils, monocytes, and T cells. J. Exp. Med. 192, 1069–1074 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  161. 161.

    Wnorowska, U. et al. Use of ceragenins as a potential treatment for urinary tract infections. BMC Infect. Dis. 19, 369 (2019).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  162. 162.

    Chromek, M. et al. The antimicrobial peptide cathelicidin protects the urinary tract against invasive bacterial infection. Nat. Med. 12, 636–641 (2006).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  163. 163.

    Lin, A. E. et al. Role of hypoxia inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α) in innate defense against uropathogenic Escherichia coli infection. PLoS Pathog. 11, e1004818–e1004818 (2015).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  164. 164.

    Mogensen, T. H. Pathogen recognition and inflammatory signaling in innate immune defenses. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 22, 240–273 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  165. 165.

    Song, J. et al. TLR4-mediated expulsion of bacteria from infected bladder epithelial cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 14966–14971 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  166. 166.

    Song, J. et al. A novel TLR4-mediated signaling pathway leading to IL-6 responses in human bladder epithelial cells. PLoS Pathog. 3, e60 (2007).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  167. 167.

    Andersen-Nissen, E. et al. Cutting edge: Tlr5-/- mice are more susceptible to Escherichia coli urinary tract infection. J. Immunol. 178, 4717–4720 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  168. 168.

    Zhang, D. et al. A Toll-like receptor that prevents infection by uropathogenic bacteria. Science 303, 1522–1526 (2004).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  169. 169.

    Isaacson, B. et al. Stromal cell-derived factor 1 mediates immune cell attraction upon urinary tract infection. Cell Rep. 20, 40–47 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  170. 170.

    Sundac, L. et al. Protein-based profiling of the immune response to uropathogenic Escherichia coli in adult patients immediately following hospital admission for acute cystitis. Pathog Dis. 74, ftw062 (2016).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  171. 171.

    Verma, V. et al. Involvement of NLRP3 and NLRC4 inflammasome in uropathogenic E. coli mediated urinary tract infections. Front. Microbiol. 10, 2020 (2019).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  172. 172.

    Rutz, S., Eidenschenk, C. & Ouyang, W. IL-22, not simply a Th17 cytokine. Immunol. Rev. 252, 116–132 (2013).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  173. 173.

    Mizoguchi, A. Healing of intestinal inflammation by IL-22. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 18, 1777–1784 (2012).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  174. 174.

    Qi, X. et al. Gut microbiota–bile acid–interleukin-22 axis orchestrates polycystic ovary syndrome. Nat. Med. 25, 1225–1233 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  175. 175.

    Sonnenberg, G. F. et al. Innate lymphoid cells promote anatomical containment of lymphoid-resident commensal bacteria. Science 336, 1321–1325 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  176. 176.

    Tang, K. Y. et al. Safety, pharmacokinetics, and biomarkers of F-652, a recombinant human interleukin-22 dimer, in healthy subjects. Cell Mol. Immunol. 16, 473–482 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  177. 177.

    Guttman-Yassky, E. et al. Efficacy and safety of fezakinumab (an IL-22 monoclonal antibody) in adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis inadequately controlled by conventional treatments: a randomized, double-blind, phase 2a trial. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 78, 872–881.e876 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  178. 178.

    Ingersoll, M. A. & Starkey, M. R. Interleukin-22 in urinary tract disease—new experimental directions. Clin. Transl. Immunol. 9, e1143 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  179. 179.

    Sarkissian, C. A., Alteri, C. J. & Mobley, H. L. UTI patients have pre-existing antigen-specific antibody titers against UTI vaccine antigens. Vaccine 37, 4937–4946 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  180. 180.

    Huttner, A. et al. Safety, immunogenicity, and preliminary clinical efficacy of a vaccine against extraintestinal pathogenic Escherichia coli in women with a history of recurrent urinary tract infection: a randomised, single-blind, placebo-controlled phase 1b trial. Lancet Infect. Dis. 17, 528–537 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  181. 181.

    Yang, B. & Foley, S. First experience in the UK of treating women with recurrent urinary tract infections with the bacterial vaccine Uromune®. BJU Int. 121, 289–292 (2018).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  182. 182.

    Lorenzo-Gómez, M. F. et al. Comparison of sublingual therapeutic vaccine with antibiotics for the prophylaxis of recurrent urinary tract infections. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 5, 50 (2015).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  183. 183.

    Neville, B. A., Forster, S. C. & Lawley, T. D. Commensal Koch’s postulates: establishing causation in human microbiota research. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 42, 47–52 (2018).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  184. 184.

    Keogh, D. et al. Enterococcal metabolite cues facilitate interspecies niche modulation and polymicrobial infection. Cell Host Microbe 20, 493–503 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  185. 185.

    Zúñiga, M., Monedero, V. & Yebra, M. J. Utilization of host-derived glycans by intestinal Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium species. Front. Microbiol. 9, 1917 (2018).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  186. 186.

    Horsley, H., Dharmasena, D., Malone-Lee, J. & Rohn, J. L. A urine-dependent human urothelial organoid offers a potential alternative to rodent models of infection. Sci. Rep. 8, 1–14 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  187. 187.

    Bein, A. et al. Microfluidic organ-on-a-chip models of human intestine. Cell. Mol. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 5, 659–668 (2018).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  188. 188.

    Ligon, M. M. et al. Single cell and tissue-transcriptomic analysis of murine bladders reveals age- and TNFa-dependent but microbiota-independent tertiary lymphoid tissue formation. Mucosal Immunol. 13, 908–918 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  189. 189.

    Chijiiwa, R. et al. Single-cell genomics of uncultured bacteria reveals dietary fiber responders in the mouse gut microbiota. Microbiome 8, 5 (2020).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  190. 190.

    Jadoon, A. et al. Gut microbial product predicts cardiovascular risk in chronic kidney disease patients. Am. J. Nephrol. 48, 269–277 (2018).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  191. 191.

    Kramer, H. et al. Diversity of the midstream urine microbiome in adults with chronic kidney disease. Int. Urol. Nephrol. 50, 1123–1130 (2018).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  192. 192.

    Sueyoshi, M. et al. Effects of lactulose on renal function and gut microbiota in adenine-induced chronic kidney disease rats. Clin. Exp. Nephrol. 23, 908–919 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  193. 193.

    O’Brien, V. P., Dorsey, D. A., Hannan, T. J. & Hultgren, S. J. Host restriction of Escherichia coli recurrent urinary tract infection occurs in a bacterial strain-specific manner. PLoS Pathog. 14, e1007457 (2018).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

S.C.F. (1156333, 1181105, 1186371, and 1159239) and M.R.S. (1156898) are supported by the National Health and Medical Research Council Australia. S.C.F. (DP190101504) and M.R.S. (DE170100226) are supported by the Australian Research Council. S.C.F. is supported by the Victorian Government’s Operational Infrastructure Support Program.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

B.J.F., M.C., V.R.M., A.V.D., S.C.F., and M.R.S. wrote and edited the paper. M.R.S. conceptualized the review.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Malcolm R. Starkey.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

S.C.F. is a scientific advisor to Microbiotica and Biomebank Australia. B.J.F., M.C., A.V.D., V.R.M., and M.R.S. declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jones-Freeman, B., Chonwerawong, M., Marcelino, V.R. et al. The microbiome and host mucosal interactions in urinary tract diseases. Mucosal Immunol (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41385-020-00372-5

Download citation

Search

Quick links