Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Application of GWAS summary data and drug-induced gene expression profiles of neural progenitor cells in psychiatric drug prioritization analysis

Abstract

Common psychiatric disorders constitute one of the most substantial healthcare burdens worldwide. However, drug development in psychiatry remains hampered partially due to the lack of approaches to estimating drugs that can simultaneously modulate the expression of a nontrivial fraction of disease susceptibility genes. We proposed a new drug prioritization strategy under the framework of our previously proposed phenotype-associated tissues estimation approach (DESE) by investigating the drugs’ selective perturbation effect on disease susceptibility genes. Based on the genome-wide association study summary data and drug-induced gene expression profiles of neural progenitor cells, we applied this strategy to prioritize candidate drugs for schizophrenia, depression and bipolar I disorder and identified several known therapeutic drugs among the top-ranked drug candidates. Also, our results revealed that the disease susceptibility genes involved in the selective gene perturbation analysis were enriched with many biologically sensible function terms and interacted with known therapeutic drugs. Our results suggested that selective gene perturbation analysis could be a promising starting point to prioritize biologically sensible drug candidates under the “one drug, multiple targets” paradigm for the drug development of common psychiatric disorders.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Overview of the strategy to prioritize the drug candidates that can significantly perturb the expression of disease susceptibility genes.
Fig. 2: The pairwise transcriptomic response correlation of drug-concentration combinations tested on Control NPC and SCZ NPC lines.
Fig. 3: The characterization of the cell lines in CMap 2 and the associations between cell lines and common psychiatry disorders.
Fig. 4: The functional annotation of the disease susceptibility genes and the comparison of therapeutic drug induced gene expression changes between potential susceptibility and non-susceptibility genes.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The GWAS summary statistics data of the three common psychiatric disorders were downloaded from the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium (https://www.med.unc.edu/pgc), and the GWAS summary statistics data of the two non-psychiatric disorders were accessed from the GWAS Catalog under accession IDs GCST90132223(RA) and GCST003116(CAD). The drug-induced gene expression profiles in Readhead et al.’s study and LINCS (2017 release) can be freely downloaded from the GEO database (GEO ID: GSE119291 and GSE92742). The information of synapse function and synapse gene enrichment is publicly available in SynGO (https://www.syngoportal.org/). The annotations of drug-gene interaction terms are publicly available in Drug Gene Interaction (DGIdb v5.0) database at https://www.dgidb.org/. The information on FDA-approved drugs for common psychiatric disorders was extracted from DrugBank 5.1.1, which can be freely downloaded from https://go.drugbank.com/releases/5-1-1/downloads/all-full-database with a simple registration for academic users.

Code availability

S-PrediXcan was freely downloaded from https://github.com/hakyimlab/MetaXcan. The DESE and drug selective perturbation analysis was performed based on our integrative software platform, KGGSEE (https://pmglab.top/kggsee/download/lib/v1/kggsee.jar, based on Java 8). The detailed manual of our strategy can be found at https://kggsee.readthedocs.io/en/latest/detailed_document.html#dese-for-drug-prioritization-analysis. The main customized scripts used in drug perturbation analysis are on GitHub (https://github.com/pmglab/Drug-prioritization-based-on-DESE, version ID: ee597de).

References

  1. Vos T, Lim SS, Abbafati C, Abbas KM, Abbasi M, Abbasifard M, et al. Global burden of 369 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet. 2020;396:1204–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Collaborators GMD. Global, regional, and national burden of 12 mental disorders in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet Psychiatry. 2022;9:137–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Arias D, Saxena S, Verguet S. Quantifying the global burden of mental disorders and their economic value. EClinicalMedicine. 2022;54:101675.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Leichsenring F, Steinert C, Rabung S, Ioannidis JPA. The efficacy of psychotherapies and pharmacotherapies for mental disorders in adults: an umbrella review and meta-analytic evaluation of recent meta-analyses. World Psychiatry. 2022;21:133–45.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Watson HJ, Yilmaz Z, Sullivan PF. The psychiatric genomics consortium: history, development, and the future. In: Bernhard TB editor. Personalized psychiatry. San Diego: Academic Press; 2020, pp. 91–101.

  6. Howard DM, Adams MJ, Clarke TK, Hafferty JD, Gibson J, Shirali M, et al. Genome-wide meta-analysis of depression identifies 102 independent variants and highlights the importance of the prefrontal brain regions. Nat Neurosci. 2019;22:343–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Mullins N, Forstner AJ, O’Connell KS, Coombes B, Coleman JRI, Qiao Z, et al. Genome-wide association study of more than 40,000 bipolar disorder cases provides new insights into the underlying biology. Nat Genet. 2021;53:817–29.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Trubetskoy V, Pardiñas AF, Qi T, Panagiotaropoulou G, Awasthi S, Bigdeli TB, et al. Mapping genomic loci implicates genes and synaptic biology in schizophrenia. Nature. 2022;604:502–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Sullivan PF, Agrawal A, Bulik CM, Andreassen OA, Børglum AD, Breen G, et al. Psychiatric genomics: an update and an agenda. Am J Psychiatry. 2018;175:15–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Musa A, Ghoraie LS, Zhang SD, Glazko G, Yli Harja O, Dehmer M, et al. A review of connectivity map and computational approaches in pharmacogenomics. Brief Bioinform. 2018;19:506–23.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lamb J, Crawford ED, Peck D, Modell JW, Blat IC, Wrobel MJ, et al. The Connectivity Map: using gene-expression signatures to connect small molecules, genes, and disease. Science. 2006;313:1929–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Subramanian A, Narayan R, Corsello SM, Peck DD, Natoli TE, Lu X, et al. A Next Generation Connectivity Map: L1000 Platform and the First 1,000,000 Profiles. Cell. 2017;171:1437–52.e17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. So HC, Chau CKL, Chiu WT, Ho KS, Lo CP, Yim SHY, et al. Analysis of genome-wide association data highlights candidates for drug repositioning in psychiatry. Nat Neurosci. 2017;20:1342–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Khodosevich K, Dragicevic K, Howes O. Drug targeting in psychiatric disorders — how to overcome the loss in translation? Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2024;23:218–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Iwata M, Sawada R, Iwata H, Kotera M, Yamanishi Y. Elucidating the modes of action for bioactive compounds in a cell-specific manner by large-scale chemically-induced transcriptomics. Sci Rep. 2017;7:40164.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Readhead B, Hartley BJ, Eastwood BJ, Collier DA, Evans D, Farias R, et al. Expression-based drug screening of neural progenitor cells from individuals with schizophrenia. Nat Commun. 2018;9:1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Giannakopoulou O, Lin K, Meng X, Su MH, Kuo PH, Peterson RE, et al. The Genetic Architecture of Depression in Individuals of East Asian Ancestry: A Genome-Wide Association Study. JAMA Psychiatry. 2021;78:1258–69.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Nikpay M, Goel A, Won HH, Hall LM, Willenborg C, Kanoni S, et al. A comprehensive 1,000 Genomes-based genome-wide association meta-analysis of coronary artery disease. Nat Genet. 2015;47:1121–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Ishigaki K, Sakaue S, Terao C, Luo Y, Sonehara K, Yamaguchi K, et al. Multi-ancestry genome-wide association analyses identify novel genetic mechanisms in rheumatoid arthritis. Nat Genet. 2022;54:1640–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Phipson B, Lee S, Majewski IJ, Alexander WS, Smyth GK. Robust hyperparameter estimation protects against hypervariable genes and improves power to detect differential expression. Ann Appl Stat. 2016;10:946–63.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Jiang L, Xue C, Dai S, Chen S, Chen P, Sham PC, et al. DESE: estimating driver tissues by selective expression of genes associated with complex diseases or traits. Genome Biol. 2019;20:233.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Kim S, Chen J, Cheng T, Gindulyte A, He J, He S, et al. PubChem in 2021: new data content and improved web interfaces. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021;49:D1388–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Barbeira AN, Dickinson SP, Bonazzola R, Zheng J, Wheeler HE, Torres JM, et al. Exploring the phenotypic consequences of tissue specific gene expression variation inferred from GWAS summary statistics. Nat Commun. 2018;9:1825.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Gamazon ER, Wheeler HE, Shah KP, Mozaffari SV, Aquino-Michaels K, Carroll RJ, et al. A gene-based association method for mapping traits using reference transcriptome data. Nat Genet. 2015;47:1091–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Barbeira AN, Bonazzola R, Gamazon ER, Liang Y, Park Y, Kim-Hellmuth S, et al. Exploiting the GTEx resources to decipher the mechanisms at GWAS loci. Genome Biol. 2021;22:49.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Wishart DS, Feunang YD, Guo AC, Lo EJ, Marcu A, Grant JR, et al. DrugBank 5.0: a major update to the DrugBank database for 2018. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46:D1074–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kolberg L, Raudvere U, Kuzmin I, Adler P, Vilo J, Peterson H. g:Profiler-interoperable web service for functional enrichment analysis and gene identifier mapping (2023 update). Nucleic Acids Res. 2023;51:W207–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Koopmans F, van Nierop P, Andres-Alonso M, Byrnes A, Cijsouw T, Coba MP, et al. SynGO: An Evidence-Based, Expert-Curated Knowledge Base for the Synapse. Neuron. 2019;103:217–34.e4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Cannon M, Stevenson J, Stahl K, Basu R, Coffman A, Kiwala S, et al. DGIdb 5.0: rebuilding the drug–gene interaction database for precision medicine and drug discovery platforms. Nucleic Acids Res. 2023;52:D1227–35.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Li M, Jiang L, Mak TSH, Kwan JSH, Xue C, Chen P, et al. A powerful conditional gene-based association approach implicated functionally important genes for schizophrenia. Bioinformatics. 2019;35:628–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Ross DT, Scherf U, Eisen MB, Perou CM, Rees C, Spellman P, et al. Systematic variation in gene expression patterns in human cancer cell lines. Nat Genet. 2000;24:227–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Lee PH, Anttila V, Won H, Feng Y-CA, Rosenthal J, Zhu Z, et al. Genomic relationships, novel loci, and pleiotropic mechanisms across eight psychiatric disorders. Cell. 2019;179:1469–82. e11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Spielmans GI, Berman MI, Linardatos E, Rosenlicht NZ, Perry A, Tsai AC. Adjunctive atypical antipsychotic treatment for major depressive disorder: a meta-analysis of depression, quality of life, and safety outcomes. PLoS Med. 2013;10:e1001403.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Wang P, Si T. Use of antipsychotics in the treatment of depressive disorders. Shanghai Arch Psychiatry. 2013;25:134.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Komossa K, Depping AM, Gaudchau A, Kissling W, Leucht S. Second‐generation antipsychotics for major depressive disorder and dysthymia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;12:CD008121.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Sepehry AA, Potvin S, Élie R, Stip E. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) add-on therapy for the negative symptoms of schizophrenia: a meta-analysis. J Clin Psychiatry. 2007;68:604–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Singh SP, Singh V, Kar N, Chan K. Efficacy of antidepressants in treating the negative symptoms of chronic schizophrenia: meta-analysis. Br J Psychiatry. 2010;197:174–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Mao YM, Zhang MD. Augmentation with antidepressants in schizophrenia treatment: benefit or risk. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2015;11:701.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Di Sciascio G, Riva MA. Aripiprazole: from pharmacological profile to clinical use. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2015;11:2635–47.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Justin J, Shin AS. Trazodone. 2022. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK470560/.

  41. Lim N, Pavlidis P. Evaluation of connectivity map shows limited reproducibility in drug repositioning. Sci Rep. 2021;11:17624.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the GTEx Consortium and 1000 Genomes Projects for providing access to the valuable data. We also appreciate the contributors and authors of the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium for sharing their valuable GWAS summary statistics.

Funding

This work was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32170637 and 32300500) and the Guangdong project (2017GC010644).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization: M.L., X.L., L.C.; Methodology: M.L., X.L., C.X., L.C., Z.Z., X.Y.; Investigation: M.L., X.L.; Visualization: M.L., X.L.; Funding acquisition: M.L., C.X.; Project administration: M.L., L.C., X.L.; Supervision: M.L., L.C.; Writing – original draft: X.L., M.L.; Writing – review and editing: X.L., M.L., L.C., Z.Z., C.X., X.Y., Q.Y. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Liqian Cui or Miaoxin Li.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, X., Xue, C., Zhu, Z. et al. Application of GWAS summary data and drug-induced gene expression profiles of neural progenitor cells in psychiatric drug prioritization analysis. Mol Psychiatry (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-024-02660-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-024-02660-z

Search

Quick links