Abstract
Smoking behaviors, including amount smoked, smoking cessation, and tobacco-related diseases, are altered by the rate of nicotine clearance. Nicotine clearance can be estimated using the nicotine metabolite ratio (NMR) (ratio of 3′hydroxycotinine/cotinine), but only in current smokers. Advancing the genomics of this highly heritable biomarker of CYP2A6, the main metabolic enzyme for nicotine, will also enable investigation of never and former smokers. We performed the largest genome-wide association study (GWAS) to date of the NMR in European ancestry current smokers (n = 5185), found 1255 genome-wide significant variants, and replicated the chromosome 19 locus. Fine-mapping of chromosome 19 revealed 13 putatively causal variants, with nine of these being highly putatively causal and mapping to CYP2A6, MAP3K10, ADCK4, and CYP2B6. We also identified a putatively causal variant on chromosome 4 mapping to TMPRSS11E and demonstrated an association between TMPRSS11E variation and a UGT2B17 activity phenotype. Together the 14 putatively causal SNPs explained ~38% of NMR variation, a substantial increase from the ~20 to 30% previously explained. Our additional GWASs of nicotine intake biomarkers showed that cotinine and smoking intensity (cotinine/cigarettes per day (CPD)) shared chromosome 19 and chromosome 4 loci with the NMR, and that cotinine and a more accurate biomarker, cotinine + 3′hydroxycotinine, shared a chromosome 15 locus near CHRNA5 with CPD and Pack-Years (i.e., cumulative exposure). Understanding the genetic factors influencing smoking-related traits facilitates epidemiological studies of smoking and disease, as well as assists in optimizing smoking cessation support, which in turn will reduce the enormous personal and societal costs associated with smoking.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $21.58 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Code availability
All scripts used for statistical analyses are available upon request.
References
Benowitz NL. Nicotine addiction. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:2295–303.
Dempsey D, Tutka P, Jacob P, Allen F, Schoedel K, Tyndale RF, et al. Nicotine metabolite ratio as an index of cytochrome P450 2A6 metabolic activity. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2004;76:64–72.
Loukola A, Buchwald J, Gupta R, Palviainen T, Hallfors J, Tikkanen E, et al. A genome-wide association study of a biomarker of nicotine metabolism. PLoS Genet. 2015;11:e1005498.
Chenoweth MJ, Tyndale RF. Pharmacogenetic optimization of smoking cessation treatment. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2017;38(Jan):55–66.
Nakajima M, Yamamoto T, Nunoya K, Yokoi T, Nagashima K, Inoue K, et al. Role of human cytochrome P4502A6 in C-oxidation of nicotine. Drug Metab Dispos. 1996;24:1212–7.
Nakajima M, Yamamoto T, Nunoya KI, Yokoi T, Nagashima K, Inoue K, et al. Characterization of CYP2A6 involved in 3’-hydroxylation of cotinine in human liver microsomes. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1996;277:1010–5.
Lea RA, Dickson S, Benowitz NL. Within-subject variation of the salivary 3HC/COT ratio in regular daily smokers: prospects for estimating CYP2A6 enzyme activity in large-scale surveys of nicotine metabolic rate. J Anal Toxicol. 2006;30:386–9.
Mooney ME, Li ZZ, Murphy SE, Pentel PR, Le C, Hatsukami DK. Stability of the nicotine metabolite ratio in ad libitum and reducing smokers. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2008;17:1396–400.
St Helen G, Jacob P 3rd, Benowitz NL. Stability of the nicotine metabolite ratio in smokers of progressively reduced nicotine content cigarettes. Nicotine Tob Res. 2013;15:1939–42.
Rossini A, de Almeida Simao T, Albano RM, Pinto LF. CYP2A6 polymorphisms and risk for tobacco-related cancers. Pharmacogenomics. 2008;9:1737–52.
Park SL, Murphy SE, Wilkens LR, Stram DO, Hecht SS, Le Marchand L. Association of CYP2A6 activity with lung cancer incidence in smokers: the multiethnic cohort study. Plos One. 2017;12:e0178435.
Yamamiya I, Yoshisue K, Ishii Y, Yamada H, Chiba M. Effect of CYP2A6 genetic polymorphism on the metabolic conversion of tegafur to 5-fluorouracil and its enantioselectivity. Drug Metab Dispos. 2014;42:1485–92.
Murai K, Yamazaki H, Nakagawa K, Kawai R, Kamataki T. Deactivation of anti-cancer drug letrozole to a carbinol metabolite by polymorphic cytochrome P450 2A6 in human liver microsomes. Xenobiotica. 2009;39:795–802.
Lerman C, Schnoll RA, Hawk LW, Cinciripini P, George TP, Wileyto EP, et al. Use of the nicotine metabolite ratio as a genetically informed biomarker of response to nicotine patch or varenicline for smoking cessation: a randomised, double-blind placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Resp Med. 2015;3:131–8.
Vardavas CI, Filippidis FT, Agaku IT. Determinants and prevalence of e-cigarette use throughout the European Union: a secondary analysis of 26 566 youth and adults from 27 Countries. Tob Control. 2015;24:442–8.
Zhu AZX, Binnington MJ, Renner CC, Lanier AP, Hatsukami DK, Stepanov I, et al. Alaska Native smokers and smokeless tobacco users with slower CYP2A6 activity have lower tobacco consumption, lower tobacco-specific nitrosamine exposure and lower tobacco-specific nitrosamine bioactivation. Carcinogenesis. 2013;34:93–101.
Chenoweth MJ, Ware JJ, Zhu AZX, Cole CB, Cox LS, Nollen N, et al. Genome-wide association study of a nicotine metabolism biomarker in African American smokers: impact of chromosome 19 genetic influences. Addiction. 2018;113:509–23.
Baurley JW, Edlund CK, Pardamean CI, Conti DV, Krasnow R, Javitz HS. et al. Genome-wide association of the laboratory-based nicotine metabolite ratio in three ancestries. Nicotine Tob Res. 2016;18:1837–44.
Patel YM, Park SL, Han Y, Wilkens LR, Bickeboller H, Rosenberger A, et al. Novel association of genetic markers affecting CYP2A6 activity and lung cancer risk. Cancer Res. 2016;76(Oct):5768–76.
Pergadia ML, Glowinski AL, Wray NR, Agrawal A, Saccone SF, Loukola A, et al. A 3p26-3p25 genetic linkage finding for DSM-IV major depression in heavy smoking families. Am J Psychiatry. 2011;168(Aug):848–52.
Zhu AZ, Renner CC, Hatsukami DK, Swan GE, Lerman C, Benowitz NL, et al. The ability of plasma cotinine to predict nicotine and carcinogen exposure is altered by differences in CYP2A6: the influence of genetics, race, and sex. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2013;22:708–18.
Park SL, Murphy SE, Wilkens LR, Stram DO, Hecht SS, Le Marchand L. Association of CYP2A6 activity with lung cancer incidence in smokers: the multiethnic cohort study. Plos One. 2017;12:e0178435.
El-Boraie A, Taghavi T, Chenoweth MJ, Fukunaga K, Mushiroda T, Kubo M, et al. Evaluation of a weighted genetic risk score for the prediction of biomarkers of CYP2A6 activity. Addict Biol. 2020;25:e12741.
Vartiainen E, Seppala T, Lillsunde P, Puska P. Validation of self reported smoking by serum cotinine measurement in a community-based study. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2002;56:167–70.
Tanner JA, Novalen M, Jatlow P, Huestis MA, Murphy SE, Kaprio J, et al. Nicotine metabolite ratio (3-hydroxycotinine/cotinine) in plasma and urine by different analytical methods and laboratories: implications for clinical implementation. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2015;24:1239–46.
Hornung RW, Reed LD. Estimation of average concentration in the presence of nondetectable values. Appl Occup Environ Hyg. 1990;5:46–51. 1990/01/01
Aulchenko YS, Ripke S, Isaacs A, van Duijn CM. GenABEL: an R library for genome-wide association analysis. Bioinformatics. 2007;23:1294–6.
Zhou X, Stephens M. Genome-wide efficient mixed-model analysis for association studies. Nat Genet. 2012;44:821–4.
Zheng J, Erzurumluoglu AM, Elsworth BL, Kemp JP, Howe L, Haycock PC, et al. LD Hub: a centralized database and web interface to perform LD score regression that maximizes the potential of summary level GWAS data for SNP heritability and genetic correlation analysis. Bioinformatics. 2017;33(Jan):272–9.
Turner SD. qqman: an R package for visualizing GWAS results using Q-Q and manhattan plots. https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/005165v1. 2014.
Chenoweth MJ, Novalen M, Hawk LW Jr., Schnoll RA, George TP, Cinciripini PM, et al. Known and novel sources of variability in the nicotine metabolite ratio in a large sample of treatment-seeking smokers. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2014;23:1773–82.
McKee SA, Weinberger AH. How can we use our knowledge of alcohol-tobacco interactions to reduce alcohol use? Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2013;9:649–74.
Gubner NR, Kozar-Konieczna A, Szoltysek-Boldys I, Slodczyk-Mankowska E, Goniewicz J, Sobczak A, et al. Cessation of alcohol consumption decreases rate of nicotine metabolism in male alcohol-dependent smokers. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2016;163:157–64.
Benowitz NL, Hukkanen J, Jacob P, III. Nicotine chemistry, metabolism, kinetics and biomarkers. Handb Exp Pharmacol. 2009;192:29–60.
Magi R, Morris AP. GWAMA: software for genome-wide association meta-analysis. BMC Bioinformatics. 2010;11:288.
Pruim RJ, Welch RP, Sanna S, Teslovich TM, Chines PS, Gliedt TP, et al. LocusZoom: regional visualization of genome-wide association scan results. Bioinformatics. 2010;26:2336–7.
Ware JJ, Chen XN, Vink J, Loukola A, Minica C, Pool R, et al. Genome-wide meta-analysis of cotinine levels in cigarette smokers identifies locus at 4q13.2. Sci Rep. 2016;6:20092.
Benner C, Spencer CCA, Havulinna AS, Salomaa V, Ripatti S, Pirinen M. FINEMAP: efficient variable selection using summary data from genome-wide association studies. Bioinformatics. 2016;32(May):1493–501.
Yang J, Lee SH, Goddard ME, Visscher PM. GCTA: a tool for genome-wide complex trait analysis. Am J Hum Genet. 2011;88:76–82.
Benner C, Havulinna AS, Salomaa V, Ripatti S, Pirinen M. Refining fine-mapping: effect sizes and regional heritability. bioRxiv. 2018:318618. https://doi.org/10.1101/318618.
Chen G, Blevins-Primeau AS, Dellinger RW, Muscat JE, Lazarus P. Glucuronidation of nicotine and cotinine by UGT2B10: loss of function by the UGT2B10 Codon 67 (Asp>Tyr) polymorphism. Cancer Res. 2007;67:9024–9.
Koga M, Ishiguro H, Yazaki S, Horiuchi Y, Arai M, Niizato K, et al. Involvement of SMARCA2/BRM in the SWI/SNF chromatin-remodeling complex in schizophrenia. Hum Mol Genet. 2009;18(Jul):2483–94.
Liu M, Jiang Y, Wedow R, Li Y, Brazel DM, Chen F, et al. Association studies of up to 1.2 million individuals yield new insights into the genetic etiology of tobacco and alcohol use. Nat Genet. 2019;51:237–44.
Chen G, Giambrone NE, Lazarus P. Glucuronidation of trans-3’-hydroxycotinine by UGT2B17 and UGT2B10. Pharmacogenet Genomics. 2012;22:183–90.
Bulik-Sullivan BK, Loh PR, Finucane HK, Ripke S, Yang J, Patterson N, et al. LD Score regression distinguishes confounding from polygenicity in genome-wide association studies. Nat Genet. 2015;47:291–5.
Astle WJ, Elding H, Jiang T, Allen D, Ruklisa D, Mann AL, et al. The allelic landscape of human blood cell trait variation and links to common complex disease. Cell. 2016;167:1415–29.
Klarin D, Damrauer SM, Cho K, Sun YV, Teslovich TM, Honerlaw J, et al. Genetics of blood lipids among ~300,000 multi-ethnic participants of the Million Veteran Program. Nat Genet. 2018;50:1514–23.
Hoffmann TJ, Theusch E, Haldar T, Ranatunga DK, Jorgenson E, Medina MW, et al. A large electronic-health-record-based genome-wide study of serum lipids. Nat Genet. 2018;50:401–13.
Zhu AZ, Zhou Q, Cox LS, Ahluwalia JS, Benowitz NL, Tyndale RF. Variation in trans-3’-hydroxycotinine glucuronidation does not alter the nicotine metabolite ratio or nicotine intake. Plos One. 2013;8:e70938.
Taghavi T, St, Helen G, Benowitz NL, Tyndale RF. Effect of UGT2B10, UGT2B17, FMO3, and OCT2 genetic variation on nicotine and cotinine pharmacokinetics and smoking in African Americans. Pharmacogenet Genomics. 2017;27:143–54.
McDonagh EM, Wassenaar C, David SP, Tyndale RF, Altman RB, Whirl-Carrillo M, et al. PharmGKB summary: very important pharmacogene information for cytochrome P-450, family 2, subfamily A, polypeptide 6. Pharmacogenet Genom. 2012;22:695–708.
Tanner JA, Tyndale RF. Variation in CYP2A6 activity and personalized medicine. J Pers Med. 2017;7:18.
Checkoway H, Powers K, Smith-Weller T, Franklin GM, Longstreth WT, Swanson PD. Parkinson’s disease risks associated with cigarette smoking, alcohol consumption, and caffeine intake. Am J Epidemiol. 2002;155:732–8.
Milberger S, Biederman J, Faraone SV, Chen L, Jones J. ADHD is associated with early initiation of cigarette smoking in children and adolescents. J Am Acad Child Psy. 1997;36:37–44.
Diaz FJ, James D, Botts S, Maw L, Susce MT, de Leon J. Tobacco smoking behaviors in bipolar disorder: a comparison of the general population, schizophrenia, and major depression. Bipolar Disord. 2009;11:154–65.
Wassenaar CA, Dong Q, Wei QY, Amos CI, Spitz MR, Tyndale RF. Relationship between CYP2A6 and CHRNA5-CHRNA3-CHRNB4 variation and smoking behaviors and lung cancer risk. J Natl Cancer I. 2011;103:1342–6.
Liu JZ, Tozzi F, Waterworth DM, Pillai SG, Muglia P, Middleton L, et al. Meta-analysis and imputation refines the association of 15q25 with smoking quantity. Nat Genet. 2010;42:436–40.
Fowler CD, Lu Q, Johnson PM, Marks MJ, Kenny PJ. Habenular alpha5 nicotinic receptor subunit signalling controls nicotine intake. Nature. 2011;471:597–601.
Minica CC, Mbarek H, Pool R, Dolan CV, Boomsma DI, Vink JM. Pathways to smoking behaviours: biological insights from the Tobacco and Genetics Consortium meta-analysis. Mol Psychiatry. 2017;22:82–8.
Wilkinson L. Exact and approximate area-proportional circular Venn and Euler diagrams. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph. 2012;18:321–31.
Acknowledgements
This work is supported by the NIH (PGRN grant DA020830 and CA197461), CIHR (FDN-154294 and PJY-159710), a Canada Research Chair, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Broad Institute, European Network for Genetic and Genomic Epidemiology, FP7-HEALTH-F4-2007, grant agreement number 201413, NIAAA (AA-12502/AA-00145/AA-09203/AA15416/K02AA018755), the Academy of Finland (100499/205585/118555/141054/264146/308248/312073/288509/312076/285380/312062/286284/134309/126925/121584/124282/129378/117787/41071/265240/263278), Finnish Foundation for Cardiovascular Research, Sigrid Juselius Foundation, University of Helsinki HiLIFE Fellow grant, Social Insurance Institution of Finland, Competitive State Research Financing of the Expert Responsibility area of Kuopio, Tampere and Turku University Hospitals (grant X51001), Juho Vainio Foundation, Paavo Nurmi Foundation, Finnish Cultural Foundation, Tampere Tuberculosis Foundation, Emil Aaltonen Foundation, Yrjö Jahnsson Foundation, Signe and Ane Gyllenberg Foundation, Diabetes Research Foundation of Finnish Diabetes Association, EU Horizon 2020 (755320), European Research Council (742927), Tampere University Hospital Supporting Foundation, Doctoral Program in Population Health (University of Helsinki), Finnish Research Foundation of the Pulmonary Diseases, Biomedicum Helsinki Foundation, and the Cancer Foundation Finland. We thank Dr Aino Kankaanpää, Maria Novalen, Leanne McNeill, and Tabatha Goncalves for laboratory work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
JB, MJC, TP, MP, NGM, JK, AL, and RFT contributed to the project design and data analysis plan. TK, SR, PAFM, TL, OR, VS, RJR, TPG, CL, NGM, JK, and RFT contributed to the collection and/or analysis of original cohort data. JB, MJC, TP, GZ, CB, and SG performed data analysis. JB, MJC, MP, JK, AL, and RFT interpreted the data. JB, MJC, MP, NGM, JK, AL, and RFT wrote the paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
TK has consulted for Pfizer Finland. VS attended a conference trip sponsored by Novo Nordisk, received an advisory board meeting honorarium, and collaborates with Bayer ltd. RFT has consulted for Quinn Emmanual and Ethismos.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Buchwald, J., Chenoweth, M.J., Palviainen, T. et al. Genome-wide association meta-analysis of nicotine metabolism and cigarette consumption measures in smokers of European descent. Mol Psychiatry 26, 2212–2223 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-020-0702-z
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-020-0702-z
This article is cited by
-
The Comprehensive Effect of Socioeconomic Deprivation on Smoking Behavior: an Observational and Genome-Wide by Environment Interaction Analyses in UK Biobank
International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction (2024)
-
Dimensional and transdiagnostic phenotypes in psychiatric genome-wide association studies
Molecular Psychiatry (2023)
-
Predicting nicotine metabolism across ancestries using genotypes
BMC Genomics (2022)
-
Genetically predicted tobacco consumption and risk of intracranial aneurysm: a Mendelian randomization study
Environmental Science and Pollution Research (2022)
-
Genetic contributions to alcohol use disorder treatment outcomes: a genome-wide pharmacogenomics study
Neuropsychopharmacology (2021)