Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Perspective
  • Published:

The Consortium on Vulnerability to Externalizing Disorders and Addictions (c-VEDA): an accelerated longitudinal cohort of children and adolescents in India

Abstract

The global burden of disease attributable to externalizing disorders such as alcohol misuse calls urgently for effective prevention and intervention. As our current knowledge is mainly derived from high-income countries such in Europe and North-America, it is difficult to address the wider socio-cultural, psychosocial context, and genetic factors in which risk and resilience are embedded in low- and medium-income countries. c-VEDA was established as the first and largest India-based multi-site cohort investigating the vulnerabilities for the development of externalizing disorders, addictions, and other mental health problems. Using a harmonised data collection plan coordinated with multiple cohorts in China, USA, and Europe, baseline data were collected from seven study sites between November 2016 and May 2019. Nine thousand and ten participants between the ages of 6 and 23 were assessed during this time, amongst which 1278 participants underwent more intensive assessments including MRI scans. Both waves of follow-ups have started according to the accelerated cohort structure with planned missingness design. Here, we present descriptive statistics on several key domains of assessments, and the full baseline dataset will be made accessible for researchers outside the consortium in September 2019. More details can be found on our website [cveda.org].

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: c-VEDA study design.
Fig. 2: Strength & Difficulties Questionnaire subscale scores by age in c-VEDA versus ALSPAC, and amongst c-VEDA participants, those who live in urban areas versus rural areas, as well as those experienced no childhood adversity defined by the frequent scale of Adverse Childhood Experience Questionnaire, versus those experienced at least one type of childhood adversity.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bogdan R, Salmeron BJ, Carey CE, Agrawal A, Calhoun VD, Garavan H, et al. Imaging genetics and genomics in psychiatry: a critical review of progress and potential. Biol Psychiatry. 2017;82:165–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Pine DS, Ernst M, Leibenluft E. Imaging–genetics applications in child psychiatry. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2010;49:772–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Viding E, Williamson DE, Hariri AR. Developmental imaging genetics: challenges and promises for translational research. Dev Psychopathol. 2006;18:877–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Meyer-Lindenberg A. Imaging genetics of schizophrenia. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2010;12:449.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Scharinger C, Rabl U, Sitte HH, Pezawas L. Imaging genetics of mood disorders. Neuroimage. 2010;53:810–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Durston S. Imaging genetics in ADHD. Neuroimage. 2010;53:832–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Domschke K, Dannlowski U. Imaging genetics of anxiety disorders. Neuroimage. 2010;53:822–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bigos KL, Weinberger DR. Imaging genetics—days of future past. Neuroimage. 2010;53:804–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Schumann G, Benegal V, Yu C, Tao S, Jernigan T, Heinz A, et al. Precision medicine and global mental health. Lancet Glob Health. 2019;7:e32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Thompson PM, Stein JL, Medland SE, Hibar DP, Vasquez AA, Renteria ME, et al. The ENIGMA Consortium: large-scale collaborative analyses of neuroimaging and genetic data. Brain Imaging Behav. 2014;8:153–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Griswold MG, Fullman N, Hawley C, Arian N, Zimsen SR, Tymeson HD, et al. Alcohol use and burden for 195 countries and territories, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet. 2018;392:1015–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Manthey J, Shield KD, Rylett M, Hasan OS, Probst C, Rehm J. Global alcohol exposure between 1990 and 2017 and forecasts until 2030: a modelling study. The Lancet. 2019;393:2493–502.

  13. World Health Organization. Global status report on alcohol and health. Geneva: World Health Organization Violence Against Women: Intimate partner and sexual; 2011.

  14. Quinlan EB, Cattrell A, Jia T, Artiges E, Banaschewski T, Barker G, et al. Psychosocial stress and brain function in adolescent psychopathology. Am J Psychiatry. 2017;174:785–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Barch DM, Belden AC, Tillman R, Whalen D, Luby JL. Early childhood adverse experiences, inferior frontal gyrus connectivity, and the trajectory of externalizing psychopathology. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2018;57:183–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Stacey D, Bilbao A, Maroteaux M, Jia T, Easton AC, Longueville S, et al. RASGRF2 regulates alcohol-induced reinforcement by influencing mesolimbic dopamine neuron activity and dopamine release. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2012;109:21128–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Schumann G, Coin LJ, Lourdusamy A, Charoen P, Berger KH, Stacey D, et al. Genome-wide association and genetic functional studies identify autism susceptibility candidate 2 gene (AUTS2) in the regulation of alcohol consumption. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108:7119–24.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Dong L, Bilbao A, Laucht M, Henriksson R, Yakovleva T, Ridinger M, et al. Effects of the circadian rhythm gene period 1 (per1) on psychosocial stress-induced alcohol drinking. Am J Psychiatry. 2011;168:1090–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Clarke T-K, Laucht M, Ridinger M, Wodarz N, Rietschel M, Maier W, et al. KCNJ6 is associated with adult alcohol dependence and involved in gene× early life stress interactions in adolescent alcohol drinking. Neuropsychopharmacology.2011;36:1142.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Blomeyer D, Treutlein J, Esser G, Schmidt MH, Schumann G, Laucht M. Interaction between CRHR1 gene and stressful life events predicts adolescent heavy alcohol use. Biol Psychiatry. 2008;63:146–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Venkata JA, Panicker AS. Prevalence of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in primary school children. Indian J Psychiatry. 2013;55:338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Pathak R, Sharma RC, Parvan UC, Gupta BP, Ojha RK, Goel N. Behavioural and emotional problems in school going adolescents. Australas Med J. 2011;4:15–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Benegal V, Nayak M, Murthy P, Chandra P, Gururaj G, Obot I. Women and alcohol use in India. In: Alcohol, gender and drinking problems: perspectives from low and middle income countries. World Health Organisation, Geneva. 2005;89:123.

  24. Charlson FJ, Baxter AJ, Cheng HG, Shidhaye R, Whiteford HA. The burden of mental, neurological, and substance use disorders in China and India: a systematic analysis of community representative epidemiological studies. Lancet. 2016;388:376–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Khandelwal S, Reddy K. Eliciting a policy response for the rising epidemic of overweight‐obesity in India. Obes Rev. 2013;14:114–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Varadharajan KS, Thomas T, Kurpad AV. Poverty and the state of nutrition in India. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2013;22:326–39.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Jedrychowski WA, Perera FP, Majewska R, Camman D, Spengler JD, Mroz E, et al. Separate and joint effects of tranplacental and postnatal inhalatory exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons: prospective birth cohort study on wheezing events. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2014;49:162–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. McCrone P, Craig TK, Power P, Garety PA. Cost-effectiveness of an early intervention service for people with psychosis. Br J Psychiatry. 2010;196:377–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Schumann G, Loth E, Banaschewski T, Barbot A, Barker G, Buchel C, et al. The IMAGEN study: reinforcement-related behaviour in normal brain function and psychopathology. Mol Psychiatry. 2010;15:1128–39.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Toledano MB, Mutz J, Röösli M, Thomas MS, Dumontheil I, Elliott P. Cohort profile: the study of cognition, adolescents and mobile phones (SCAMP). Int J Epidemiol. 2018;48:25–6l.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Boyd A, Golding J, Macleod J, Lawlor DA, Fraser A, Henderson J, et al. Cohort profile: the ‘children of the 90s’—the index offspring of the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children. Int J Epidemiol. 2013;42:111–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Duncan SC, Duncan TE, Hops H. Analysis of longitudinal data within accelerated longitudinal designs. Psycholog Methods 1996;1:236–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Little TD, Rhemtulla M. Planned missing data designs for developmental researchers. Child Dev Perspect. 2013;7:199–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. World Medical Association. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 2001;79:373.

  35. Houtepen LC, Heron J, Suderman MJ, Tilling K, Howe LD. Adverse childhood experiences in the children of the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC). Wellcome Open Res. 2018;3:106–20.

  36. Clark DB, Fisher CB, Bookheimer S, Brown SA, Evans JH, Hopfer C, Hudziak J, Montoya I, Murray M, Pfefferbaum A, Yurgelun-Todd D. Biomedical ethics and clinical oversight in multisite observational neuroimaging studies with children and adolescents: the ABCD experience. Developmental Cogn Neurosci. 2018;32:143–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Seaman SR, Bartlett JW, White IR. Multiple imputation of missing covariates with non-linear effects and interactions: an evaluation of statistical methods. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012;12:46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Seaman SR, White IR, Copas AJ, Li L. Combining multiple imputation and inverse-probability weighting. Biometrics. 2012;68:129–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Mills KL, Tamnes CK. Methods and considerations for longitudinal structural brain imaging analysis across development. Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2014;9:172–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Falk EB, Hyde LW, Mitchell C, Faul J, Gonzalez R, Heitzeg MM, et al. What is a representative brain? Neuroscience meets population science. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013;110:17615–22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Matta TH, Flournoy JC, Byrne ML. Making an unknown unknown a known unknown: missing data in longitudinal neuroimaging studies. Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2018;33:83–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Reich D, Thangaraj K, Patterson N, Price AL, Singh L. Reconstructing Indian population history. Nature. 2009;461:489.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Thyreau B, Schwartz Y, Thirion B, Frouin V, Loth E, Vollstadt-Klein S, et al. Very large fMRI study using the IMAGEN database: sensitivity-specificity and population effect modeling in relation to the underlying anatomy. NeuroImage. 2012;61:295–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

c-VEDA is jointly funded by the Indian Council for Medical Research (ICMR/MRC/3/M/2015-NCD-I) and the Newton Grant from the Medical Research Council (MR/N000390/1), United Kingdom.

The c-VEDA consortium

Vivek Benegal29, Gunter Schumann30, Pratima Murthy31, Bharath Holla31, Eesha Sharma32, Meera Purushottam33, Rose Dawn Bharath34, Sanjeev Jain31, Mathew Varghese31, Thennarasu Kandavel35, Deepak Jayarajan31, Keshav Kumar36, Preeti Jacob32, Amit Chakrabarti37, Rajkumar Lenin Singh38, Roshan Lourembam Singh38, Debasish Basu39, Subodh Bhagyalakshmi Nanjayya39, Chirag Kumar Ahuja40, Kartik Kalyanram41, Kamakshi Kartik41, Kumaran Kalyanram42, Krishnaveni Ghattu42, Murali Krishna43, Rebecca Kuriyan44, Sunita Simon Kurpad45, Sylvane Desrivieres30, Gareth Barker46, Udita Iyengar30, Yuning Zhang30, Nilakshi Vaidya30, Matthew Hickman47, Jon Heron48, Gwen Fernandes49, Mireille Toledano50, Dimitri Papadopoulos Orfanos51, Madhavi Rangaswamy52, Gitanjali Narayanan53, Urvakhsh Meherwan Mehta31, Paul Elliott50, Satish Chandra Girimaji32, Madhu Khullar54, Niranjan Khandelwal55, Nainesh Joshi54, Amit55, Debangana Bhattacharya56, Bidisha Haque56, Arpita Ghosh56, Alisha Nagraj56, Anirban Basu56, Mriganka Mouli Pandit56, Subhadip Das56, Anupa Yadav56, Surajit Das56, Sanjit Roy56, Pawan Kumar Maurya56, Ningthoujam Debala Chanu38, Fujica M C38, Victoria Ph.38, Celina Phurailatpam38, Amritha Gourisankar41, Geetha Rani41, Sujatha B41, Caroline Fall57, Kiran K N42, Ramya M C42, Chaithra Urs42, Santhosh N42, Somashekhara R42, Divyashree K42, Arathi Rao44, Poornima R44, Saswathika Tripathy29, Neha Parashar29, Dhanalakshmi D29, Nayana K B29, Ashwini Kalkunte Seshadri29, Sathish Kumar29, Thamodaran Arumugam29, Apoorva Safai29, Suneela Kuman Baligar29, Anthony Mary Cyril29, Aanchal Sharda29, Rashmitha29, Ashika Anne Roy29, Shivamma D29, Kiran L29, Bhavana B R29

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Vivek Benegal or Gunter Schumann.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, Y., Vaidya, N., Iyengar, U. et al. The Consortium on Vulnerability to Externalizing Disorders and Addictions (c-VEDA): an accelerated longitudinal cohort of children and adolescents in India. Mol Psychiatry 25, 1618–1630 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-020-0656-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-020-0656-1

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links