A psychiatric disease-related circular RNA controls synaptic gene expression and cognition

Abstract

Although circular RNAs (circRNAs) are enriched in the mammalian brain, very little is known about their potential involvement in brain function and psychiatric disease. Here, we show that circHomer1a, a neuronal-enriched circRNA abundantly expressed in the frontal cortex, derived from Homer protein homolog 1 (HOMER1), is significantly reduced in both the prefrontal cortex (PFC) and induced pluripotent stem cell-derived neuronal cultures from patients with schizophrenia (SCZ) and bipolar disorder (BD). Moreover, alterations in circHomer1a were positively associated with the age of onset of SCZ in both the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and orbitofrontal cortex (OFC). No correlations between the age of onset of SCZ and linear HOMER1 mRNA were observed, whose expression was mostly unaltered in BD and SCZ postmortem brain. Using in vivo circRNA-specific knockdown of circHomer1a in mouse PFC, we show that it modulates the expression of numerous alternative mRNA transcripts from genes involved in synaptic plasticity and psychiatric disease. Intriguingly, in vivo circHomer1a knockdown in mouse OFC resulted in specific deficits in OFC-mediated cognitive flexibility. Lastly, we demonstrate that the neuronal RNA-binding protein HuD binds to circHomer1a and can influence its synaptic expression in the frontal cortex. Collectively, our data uncover a novel psychiatric disease-associated circRNA that regulates synaptic gene expression and cognitive flexibility.

Introduction

Bipolar disorder (BD) and schizophrenia (SCZ) are multifactorial and heterogeneous psychiatric disorders with an average age of onset during late adolescence to young adulthood that together affect more than 3.5% of the US population and result in significant socioeconomic burdens [1,2,3]. While many studies have uncovered critical protein-coding genes associated with psychiatric disorders, such as those linked to synaptic plasticity and glutamate neurotransmission [4,5,6,7,8], the pathogenesis and pathophysiology of SCZ and BD remain elusive. Thus, novel molecular targets and mechanisms need to be discovered to produce clinically viable treatments. Both large and small noncoding RNAs (ncRNAs) have been recently shown to have important regulatory functions with significant implications for brain development, plasticity, and psychiatric disease [9,10,11,12]. Understanding the function of ncRNAs has led to the recognition of their ability to orchestrate the activity of complex regulatory pathways, which allows them to link multiple genetic risk factors for polygenic human disorders, such as BD and SCZ, into functional molecular networks.

Circular RNAs (circRNAs) are a novel category of long ncRNAs that are derived from the circularization and covalent joining of backspliced exons and/or introns [13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26]. CircRNAs are particularly enriched in the mammalian brain, yet, with few exceptions, lack the capacity of being translated into protein [13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26]. The recent application of improved annotation tools following deep sequencing has revealed the existence of tens of thousands of circRNAs in multiple species [16, 18, 19, 22, 23]. Some circRNAs are known to sequester microRNAs (miRNAs) by containing partial complementary sequences [17, 22, 26] and others to associate with RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) and transcription factors [15, 20]. However, the mechanism of action of the overwhelming majority of brain expressed circRNAs remains elusive. Moreover, their significance for psychiatric disorders has not yet been explored, despite the findings that brain-enriched circRNAs are being preferentially derived from genes involved in synaptic plasticity [24, 25] and the fact that circRNAs are the most resistant to degradation of the RNA species and, thus, ideal for postmortem studies. A pivotal study using mice with whole body deletions of the highly expressed circRNA CDR1as, together with its lowly expressed linear isoform, revealed changes in miRNA and activity-dependent gene expression, as well as electrophysiological and behavioral abnormalities [26], describing for the first time the potential importance of circRNAs for brain function. Moreover, recent studies utilized novel circRNA annotation approaches to extract circRNA expression data from RNA-sequencing experiments in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) of subjects with SCZ [27, 28]. Furthermore, another study uncovered alterations in a circRNA altered in the blood of patients with monopolar depression that could regulate microglial activation and depressive-like behavior in mice, thus highlighting the role of circRNAs in glial function [29]. However, nothing is known thus far about the importance of neuronal-enriched circRNAs with direct relevance to SCZ and BD in neuronal gene expression and disease-related cognition.

Previous work in induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cell-derived neuronal cultures from patients with BD has revealed the presence of hyperexcitable neuronal responses [30, 31]. Moreover, mice with a deficiency in disrupted in schizophrenia 1 (DISC1), a gene linked by rare variants to SCZ and mental illness [32, 33], display similar increases in neuronal excitation [34]. In addition, disturbances in the glutamatergic system and alterations in synaptic plasticity have been suggested for SCZ and BD [4,5,6,7,8]. HOMER protein homolog 1 (HOMER1) is a well-established regulator of synaptic plasticity and neuronal excitability, which has been linked to a plethora of psychiatric disorders, including SCZ and depression [35,36,37,38,39]. Long HOMER1 protein isoforms, such as HOMER1B and HOMER1C, dimerize and bind through their C terminus coiled-coil (CC) domains to numerous components of the postsynaptic density, such as Group1 metabotropic glutamate receptors, N-Methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor scaffolding SH3 and multiple ankyrin repeat domains proteins (SHANK), and other receptors to regulate calcium signaling in excitatory synapses [35,36,37,38,39]. However, the activity-dependent short isoform S (HOMER1S also known as HOMER1A) lacks the CC domain and behaves as a dominant-negative regulator of HOMER1 scaffolding capacity, thereby limiting synaptic neuronal activity and acting as a brake to neuronal excitability [35, 36, 38]. Interestingly, general Homer1 knockout mice display symptoms reminiscent of SCZ, and specific disruption of the short or long Homer1 isoforms results in different behavioral deficits [36, 37, 39].

Using cutting-edge circRNA methodologies in postmortem brain samples from the orbitofrontal cortex (OFC), a region of the prefrontal cortex (PFC) implicated in psychiatric disorders and responsible for high order cognitive functions, including behavioral flexibility [40,41,42], we have identified an abundant and activity-dependent neuronal-enriched circRNA [16, 25], circHomer1a, that is robustly reduced in SCZ and BD. Furthermore, we report that circHomer1a, which is generated from the backsplicing of four exons from the psychiatric disorder-related, synaptically expressed HOMER1 [13, 43, 44], is also significantly downregulated in iPS cell-derived neuronal cultures from SCZ and BD patients and the DLPFC of subjects with SCZ. In addition, alterations in circHomer1a in both the OFC and DLPFC were found to be significantly positively associated with the age of onset of SCZ. In parallel, we show that circHomer1a, which is highly conserved between human and mouse, is enriched in adult mouse frontal cortex and abundantly expressed in cortical neurons but not astrocytes. Using brain region-specific in vivo knockdown of circHomer1a in mouse OFC we show that it is capable of regulating the expression of specific isoforms from synaptic plasticity-related genes with relevance for psychiatric disorders. Intriguingly, knockdown of circHomer1a in the OFC is sufficient to disrupt OFC-mediated cognitive flexibility. Moreover, we show that circHomer1a binds to the RBP HuD (also known as ELAV-like protein 4; ELAVL4), which results in increased synaptic circHomer1a expression in mouse PFC. Taken together, our study is the first to characterize the effects of a psychiatric disease-associated, neuronal-enriched circRNA on synaptic gene expression and PFC-mediated cognitive flexibility.

Material and methods

Animals

The Institutional Care and Use Committee (IACUC) at the University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center approved all experimental procedures. WT mice used in our study were all C57BL/6 mice (The Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME). C57BL/6 mice overexpressing HuD under a Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II alpha promoter were also used (HUD-OE) [45]. HUD knockout (HuD-KO) mice were a gift from Dr Hideyuki Okano (Department of Physiology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan) [46]. These mice were backcrossed with C57/BL6J for more than ten generations. Adult male mice were used for our experiments. Investigators were not blind to animal genotypes or treatment groups.

Postmortem samples

Human postmortem brain total RNA samples from the OFC of subjects with BD (n = 32), SCZ (n = 34), and unaffected Controls (n = 34) were obtained from the Stanley Medical Research Institute [47]. Details on demographics are shown in Supplementary Table 1. DLPFC total RNA samples were also obtained from the same cohort.

RNA extraction and mRNA/circRNA quantification

RNA extraction was done as shown before [48, 49]. Briefly RNA was isolated using the miRNeasy RNA isolation kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). RNA quality and concentration of isolated and purchased total RNA was assayed through Nanodrop 2000 spectrophotometer and Qubit 3 (ThermoFisher Scientific). RNA was stored in a −80 °C freezer till use.

CircRNA profiling in human postmortem brains

Profiling of circRNA expression in 100 human OFC postmortem brain (34 SCZ, 32 BD, and 34 Controls) was performed with the Arraystar Human Circular RNA Microarray (Arraystar Inc., Rockville, MD) per the manufacturer’s instructions with 13,617 probes designed to detect the unique circRNA splice junction based on numerous RNA-sequencing circRNA data [16, 19, 22, 23, 50, 51]. Briefly 800 ng of total RNA previously quantified and quality verified (see above) were treated with an aggressive RnaseR treatment (3 h at 37 °C of ribonuclease R, 20 U/μL, Epicentre, Madison WI) to digest linear RNAs and enrich for circRNA expression. The enriched for circRNAs RNA was then amplified and transcribed into fluorescent cRNA via random primers according to the Arraystar Super RNA Labelling protocol (Arraystar Inc.). The labeled circRNAs were then hybridized onto the Arraystar Human Circular RNA arrays (8 × 15 K, Arraystar, Inc.) and incubated for 17 h at 65 °C in an Agilent hybridization oven (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA). Slides were then washed and scanned with the Agilent Scanner G2505C (Agilent Technologies). Differentially altered circRNAs as shown in Supplementary Tables 23. All circRNA profiling data have been deposited in the Mendeley online data repository: https://data.mendeley.com/datasets/9zdhc6pmx5/1.

Quantification of circRNA and mRNA expression

Reverse transcription was performed using the SuperScript IV First-Strand Synthesis System (ThermoFisher Scientific) with random hexamers for circRNA and oligo-dT primers for linear mRNA RNA detection. cDNA was then used together with custom made, validated, and sequence-verified circRNA and mRNA primers or TaqMan mRNA primers (ThermoFisher Scientific) for mRNA qRT-PCR. 18S rRNA was used as a normalizer for mRNA detection, whereas circTulp4 and circCDR1as were used for circRNA normalization. For mRNA qRT-PCR quantification the following formula was used: Relative value = A^Ct18S rRNA/A^CtmRNA, where A = 10^(−1/primer slope). For circRNA qRT-PCR quantification the following formula was used: Relative value = A^Ct2circRNA normalizers(geometric mean of CtcircTulp4 and CtCDR1as)/A^CtcircRNA, where A = 10^(−1/primer slope). In the cases where one circRNA normalizer (circTulp4) was used the formula changes to: Relative value = A^CtcircTulp4/A^CtcircRNA, where A = 10^(−1/primer slope). Lastly when no normalizers were used circRNA relative expression was calculated as: Relative value = [A^ − CtcircRNA)] × 10^6, where A = 10^(−1/primer slope). All circRNA primers were run on an agarose gel and were sequence-validated. Moreover, their resistance to RNaseR and reduced abundance in oligo-dT reverse-transcribed cDNA were tested, together with melting curve and slope analysis. Detailed information about all the primers used in our study are included in Supplementary Table 4.

Please see Supplemental Information for additional “Material and Methods”.

Results

Deficits in circHomer1a but not linear HOMER1 mRNA expression in the OFC of both BD and SCZ and association with age of onset

We employed a circRNA microarray platform that uses 13,617 circRNA splice junction probes designed based on previous RNA sequencing and circRNA annotation data [16, 19, 22, 23, 50, 51] to screen for circRNA expression in OFC RNA samples from 34 SCZ, 32 BD, and 34 unaffected control subjects from the Stanley Medical Research Institute [47] (Supplementary Table 1). We detected more than 10,000 circRNAs in these 100 RNA samples (Supplementary Fig. 1), which were all first treated with RNaseR for preferential digestion of linear transcripts (see also Supplementary “Material and Methods”). Analysis of circRNA changes in BD uncovered a subset of differentially expressed circRNAs (Fig. 1a and Supplementary Table 2) stemming from genes related to synaptic transmission, neuronal development and migration, and short-term memory (Supplementary Fig. 2a and Supplementary Table 2). On the other hand circRNAs altered in SCZ (Fig. 1b and Supplementary Table 3) were associated among others with the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK/ERK) and protein kinase B (PKB/AKT) pathways (Supplementary Fig. 2b and Supplementary Table 3). Although harsh RNAseR treatment is beneficial in significantly enriching relative circRNA abundance within RNA samples by efficiently digesting all linear RNAs, it can also partially digest some circRNAs, thus making circRNA screening semiquantitative. In order to accurately validate circRNA expression we designed, validated, and sequence-verified (see circRNA splice junction sequence example in Fig. 1c, Supplementary Fig. 2c also Supplementary “Material and Methods”) circRNA-specific qRT-PCR primers aimed at the unique circRNA-specific splice junction to measure a subset of dysregulated circRNAs in BD and/or SCZ in non-RNaseR-treated samples. For normalization, we utilized the geometric mean of two highly expressed circRNAs that are unchanged in BD and SCZ based on both the circRNA array and qRT-PCR (circTulp4, and CDR1as, Supplementary Fig. 3a and Supplementary Tables 2 and 3). Our results, which were corrected for various postmortem brain demographics such as RNA integrity number (RIN), postmortem interval (PMI), brain pH, and refrigeration interval (RI) using a general linear model (see also Supplementary “Material and Methods”), revealed robust reductions in circHomer1a, an exonic circRNA generated from HOMER1, in BD as shown in the array, but also in SCZ (Fig. 1d). In addition, we validated a downregulation of circADAM22, a circRNA derived from the epilepsy-related gene ADAM metallopeptidase domain 22 (ADAM22) (Fig. 1e), only in BD. We also found that circCUL4A, an intronic circRNA from ubiquitin ligase Cullin-4A (CUL4A), was unchanged in BD but significantly increased in SCZ (Fig. 1f), similar to what was shown in the circRNA array. Of note, repeating circHomer1a qRT-PCR validation in RNaseR-treated samples without any normalization still showed robust reductions in both BD and SCZ, with the majority of cases exhibiting notable deficits in circHomer1a (Fig. 1g).

Fig. 1: Alterations in circHomer1a expression in BD and SCZ OFC.
figure1

Volcano plots showing differential circRNA expression in BD (a) and SCZ (b) patients vs unaffected Controls (x-axis = relative to control log2 fold changes; y-axis: negative log10 of the p values). Vertical lines correspond to >1.25-fold changes, and the horizontal line represents p < 0.05. Example of validated circRNAs is shown in the graph. c Schematic representation of circRNA biogenesis and detection for human circHomer1a. Schematic of hHOMER1 gene and circHomer1a backsplicing from HOMER1B mRNA precursor. Complementary antisense sequences in introns 1 and 5 of HOMER1B are brought together by RBPs to result in the backsplicing of exons 2 and 5 to create precursor circHomer1a [13], which is then spliced into mature circHomer1a. The location for shRNAs and probes for circHomer1a-specific knockdown and detection, respectively, are shown. df Mean ± SEM relative to Control circHomer1a (e), circADAM22 (f), and circCUL4A (g) levels (qRT-PCR, normalized to the geometric mean of highly expressed and unaltered circTulp4 and CDR1as; see also Supplementary Fig. 3a) in the OFC of subjects with SCZ and BD. A schematic of the exonic nature of circHomer1a and circADAM22 (different exons shown in different colors) and the intronic nature of circCUL4A is also shown. g Reductions in circHomer1a in SCZ and BD OFC via qRT-PCR in RNAseR-treated samples (no normalization, shown as relative to Control Mean ± SEM ratios). dg **p < 0.01, based on a Univariate General Linear Model corrected for RIN, PMI, RI, and brain pH. h RNaseR increases the relative abundance of circHomer1a, whereas poly-A selection depletes circHomer1a expression (Mean ± SEM, ***p < 0.001, two-tailed one sample t-test). i Relative to Control changes in circHomer1a in the OFC of patients with SCZ are positively correlated to the age of onset of the disease. Spearman correlation coefficient and two-tailed p values are shown in the graph. In all postmortem data graphs, individual SCZ (red circles), BD (green circles), and Control (blue circles) sample values are shown. j Representative bright-field image from 6 to 9 months differentiated human embryonic stem cell (hESC)-derived very mature mixed neuronal and glial cultures. Immunofluorescence showing the presence of neurons (MAP2, red) and astrocytes (GFAP, green) is shown in the left. Scale bar = 100µm. k Relative to Vehicle Mean ± SEM circHomer1a expression (based on circRNA qRT-PCR, without normalization) following treatment with olanzapine (Olanz), Haloperidol (Hal), or valproic acid (VPA) for 2 days in human 6–9 months differentiated stem cell-derived mixed neuronal and astrocyte cultures. *p < 0.05, two-tailed one sample t-test. In all bar graphs the individual replicates are shown within the graph.

We decided to further focus on circHomer1a, given its notable changes in both SCZ and BD, its bona-fide circRNA identity (i.e., resistance to RNaseR treatment and depletion following poly-A tail selection—Fig. 1g, h), and its validated noncoding nature [16]. In order to determine whether postmortem demographics could influence circHomer1a levels in the OFC, we examined associations between changes in circHomer1a in both SCZ and BD and 18 separate demographics, including age, sex, and lifetime antipsychotic treatment (Supplementary Table 5). We observed no interactions with the exception of a negative correlation with duration of illness (Supplementary Table 5). On the other hand, looking at just SCZ, we did observe a significant positive correlation between changes in circHomer1a in the OFC and the age of onset of SCZ (Fig. 1i). To further determine the influence of antipsychotics on human neuronal and glial circHomer1a expression we generated very mature human pluripotent stem cell-derived mixed neuronal and glial cultures (differentiated for 6–9 months—Fig. 1j). Due to the reported accelerated neuronal maturation in stem cell-derived neuronal cultures, such a very late stage culture is expected to be of a developmental stage equivalent to postnatal human brain development and is thus more informative [52, 53]. Treatment of these cultures with either olanzapine, haloperidol, or valproic acid (VPA) for 2 days resulted in no major changes in circHomer1a, but a modest increase due to VPA (Fig. 1k).

CircRNA databases predict that circHomer1a is generated from exons 2 to 5 of HOMER1 following backsplicing and covalent joining between exon 5 and exon 2 of the longest HOMER1B isoform (Fig. 1c) [43, 44]. Moreover, a previous study has suggested that circHomer1a backsplicing is facilitated by trinucleotide repeat-containing 6A (an RBP also known as GW182) in antisense repeat sequences in introns 1 and 5 close to the splice junction (Fig. 1c) [13]. To determine the relative HOMER1 mRNA changes in BD and SCZ, we measured the expression of total HOMER1 mRNA in linear RNA-enriched cDNA samples following oligo-dT reverse transcription with specific primers designed to avoid circRNA detection, and after normalization to 18S rRNA (a reliable normalizer unchanged in BD and SCZ; Supplementary Fig. 3b, c) [10, 54, 55]. As in the case of circRNA qRT-PCR, all linear RNA data were corrected for RIN, PMI, brain pH, and RI (see also Supplementary “Material and Methods”). We found a modest reduction in total HOMER1 expression only in SCZ, but no changes in BD within the OFC (Supplementary Fig. 3c). To test whether circHomer1a levels could be associated with linear HOMER1 mRNA expression, we plotted circHomer1a changes vs total HOMER1 mRNA. We only observed a weak positive correlation between circHomer1a and HOMER1 mRNA (Supplementary Fig. 3d). Lastly, no association was found between changes in HOMER1 mRNA in SCZ OFC and the age of onset of the disease (r = +0.0908, p = 0.6374, based on Spearman’s correlation). We thus conclude that circHomer1a, but not linear HOMER1 mRNA, is notably reduced in the OFC of both BD and SCZ patients and associated with the age of onset of SCZ.

Downregulation of circHomer1a but not linear HOMER1 mRNA in SCZ DLPFC and in both SCZ and BD patient-derived neuronal cultures

In order to determine the brain region-specificity of circHomer1a alterations in psychiatric disorders we quantified circHomer1a expression in the DLPFC of BD, SCZ, and unaffected Controls from the same cohort from Stanley Medical Research Institute used for the OFC measurements. Using the same circRNA normalizers (circTulp4/CDR1as, not altered in DLPFC as well; see Supplementary Fig. 4a) and statistical analysis models as shown above for the OFC (General Linear model correcting for multiple postmortem demographics), we found that circHomer1a was significantly reduced in the DLPFC of only SCZ subjects (Fig. 2a). On the other hand, other circRNAs found to be altered in the OFC, such as circCUL4A and circADAM22, were unchanged in the DLPFC (Fig. 2b and Supplementary Fig. 4b). Interestingly, changes in circHomer1a in SCZ were positively associated with the age of onset of the disease in the DLPFC (Fig. 2c). Moreover, using the same linear mRNA quantification, normalization (18S rRNA—not changing at DLPFC as well; Supplementary Fig. 4c), and analysis methods as the ones used for the OFC, we found that linear HOMER1 mRNA was not altered in the DLPFC (Fig. 2d). Furthermore, changes in HOMER1 mRNA expression had no impact on the age of onset of SCZ (r = +0.1037, p = 0.5788, based on Spearman’s correlation), in contrast to circHomer1a. A weak positive correlation between circHomer1a and HOMER1 mRNA was also found in the DLPFC (Supplementary Fig. 4d).

Fig. 2: Alterations in circHomer1a but not linear HOMER1 mRNA expression in SCZ DLPFC and stem cell-derived neuronal cultures of subjects with SCZ and BD.
figure2

Mean ± SEM relative to Control circHomer1a (a) and circCUL4A (b) levels (qRT-PCR, normalized to the geometric mean of highly expressed and unaltered circTulp4 and CDR1as; see also Supplementary Fig. 3a) in the DLPFC of subjects with BD and SCZ. c Relative to Control changes in circHomer1a in the DLPFC of patients with SCZ are positively correlated to the age of onset of the disease. Spearman correlation coefficient and two-tailed p values are shown in the graph. d Mean ± SEM relative to Control HOMER1 mRNA levels (qRT-PCR, normalized to the highly expressed and unaltered 18S rRNA; see also Supplementary Fig. 4c) in the DLPFC of subjects with BD and SCZ. a, b, d **p < 0.01, based on a Univariate General Linear Model corrected for RIN, PMI, RI, and brain pH. In all postmortem data graphs, individual SCZ (red circles), BD (green circles), and Control (blue circles) sample values are shown. Mean ± SEM relative to the mean of Control neuronal progenitors (NPs) circHomer1a (e) and HOMER1 mRNA (f) levels in iPS cell-derived SCZ patient and Control (n = 10 Control and 9 SCZ subjects) NPs and 6-week differentiated neurons. Mean ± SEM relative to the mean of Control NPs circHomer1a (g), and HOMER1 mRNA (h) levels in iPS cell-derived BD patient and Control (n = 3 Control and 4 BD) NPs and 2-, 4-, and 6-week differentiated neurons. eh #0.10 > p > 0.05, *p < 0.05, two-tailed one sample t-test relative to the Control of the same developmental time-point. In all bar graphs the individual replicates are shown within the graph.

Furthermore, we measured the expression of circHomer1a and linear HOMER1 mRNA in a large subset of iPS cell-derived neuronal progenitors (NPs) and 6-week differentiated neurons from early onset SCZ patients and controls (n = 9 patients/10 controls) [56], and in iPS cell-derived NPs and neuronal cultures from patients with BD and unaffected controls [10] that were differentiated for 2, 4, and 6 weeks (n = 4 patients and 3 controls for each developmental stage) (Fig. 2e–h). Our results revealed that circHomer1a was consistently downregulated in both BD and SCZ patient-derived neuronal cultures (Fig. 2e, f), but not NPs, but it appeared to be more robustly reduced in 6-week BD patient-derived neurons (Fig. 2e). In addition, the expression of circHomer1a increased threefold to fourfold as neurons differentiated to become synaptically active (6 weeks after differentiation vs NPs, Fig. 2e, f). Moreover, HOMER1 mRNA was significantly increased in 6-week SCZ iPS cell-derived neurons and displayed no changes in 6-week BD iPS cell-derived neurons in contrast to circHomer1a (Fig. 2g, h). Furthermore, no notable developmental changes were seen in the expression of HOMER1 mRNA (Fig. 2g, h). Of note, NPs and 6-week iPS cell-derived neuronal cultures from the BD and SCZ cohorts, displayed similar GABAergic and excitatory neuronal gene expression, but had some differences in NPs and immature neuronal gene expression (Supplementary Fig. 5a–d). We conclude that circHomer1a is significantly downregulated in stem cell-derived neuronal samples from both patients with BD and SCZ and is also reduced in the DLPFC of patients with SCZ, where its changes are also positively associated with the age of onset of the disease.

CircHomer1a is a neuronal-enriched circRNA abundantly expressed in the frontal cortex that binds to HuD

Despite the low evolutionary conservation of most circRNAs, the mature circHomer1a sequence is highly conserved between human and mouse (16, 24, 25, 43, 44; see also Supplementary Fig. 6). On the other hand, with the exception of mouse Homer1b and Homer1a, which have a high degree of sequence similarities to human HOMER1B and HOMER1A, respectively, other well-characterized mouse isoforms, such as Homer1c, do not appear to be much conserved (Fig. 3a and not shown, see also Fig. 1d). As far as the developmental- and brain region-specificity of mouse circHomer1a, we found that it was robustly upregulated from prenatal to adult total brain and it was enriched in the adult frontal cortex with lower expression in other brain regions (Fig. 3b). On the other hand, circTulp4 was modestly upregulated in adult vs fetal brain and was similarly expressed in most brain regions with the exception of modest increases in the brainstem and cerebellum (Fig. 3c). Moreover, expression of circHomer1a was found to be upregulated during differentiation of mouse cortical neuronal cultures, but was barely detectable in mouse cortical astrocytic cultures (Fig. 3d). In contrast, circTulp4, which is known to be highly expressed in the mouse brain, was found to have the highest expression in immature neurons and moderate expression in astrocytes and mature neurons (Supplementary Fig. 7a). Subcellular fractionation and synaptosome isolation in adult mouse OFC samples revealed equal distribution of circHomer1a expression in synaptosomes, nuclear, and cytoplasmic/soluble fractions (Fig. 3e), which was similar to circTulp4, a known synapse-enriched circRNA (Supplementary Fig. 7b). Moreover, in situ hybridization for circHomer1a in mouse neuronal cultures using a circRNA-specific two-probe splice junction approach that also utilizes sequential branched DNA signal amplification revealed that it was enriched in pyramidal-like neurons, where it was expressed in both the nucleus, the cytoplasm, and neurites (Fig. 3f, i), which is in agreement with a previous study [25].

Fig. 3: Developmental, cellular, and subcellular specificity of circHomer1a expression and effects of HuD binding.
figure3

a Schematic showing mouse Homer1 gene, circHomer1a, and Homer1 pre-mRNA isoforms. Mean ± SEM mouse circHomer1a (b) and circTulp4 (c) (based on qRT-PCR, without normalization) in E19 fetal (E19) and adult whole brains (Total), as well in adult FC frontal cortex, HIP hippocampus, HYP hypothalamus, CB cerebellum, and BS brainstem. **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, based on two-tailed one sample t-test compared with the mean of circRNA expression in adult whole brain. d Mean ± SEM relative to the mean expression in DIV18 neurons) circHomer1a levels (normalized to 18S rRNA) in mouse cortical neurons of DIV18 and DIV28 of differentiation and mouse cortical astrocytes. **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, based on ANOVA with correction for multiple comparison. e Mean ± SEM relative circHomer1a expression (based on qRT-PCR, without normalization) in mouse OFC nuclear, crude synaptosomal (SYN), and cytoplasmic/soluble (S2) subcellular fragments. In all bar graphs, the number of replicates is shown within the graph. f Schematic showing circHomer1a in situ probe design using two probes that can bind to the exon 2/5 splice junction and detection via sequential branched DNA signal amplification. g Image showing the expression of circHomer1a in mouse neuronal cultures via in situ hybridization with two probes aiming at its splice junction (both probes need to specifically bind for a signal to be generated) and signal amplification (red). Co-Immunostaining for Homer1b/c (gray—dendritic and post synaptic) and SMI-312 (green—pan axonal) is also shown. DAPI staining is shown in blue. Scale bar = 50µm. Higher magnification from circHomer1a in situ hybridization (h) and negative control (no-probe, i) in mouse neuronal cultures overlaid with bright-field images. Notice the subcellular expression of circHomer1a in the nucleus, cytoplasm, and neurites (white arrows) of a pyramidal neuron-like cell (h). Scale bar = 25µm. j Sequence of mouse circHomer1a with the three predicted HuD binding sites highlighted in purple and the nucleotides that are conserved with human shown in capital. k Representative blot following RIP (anti-Myc) in human HuD-Myc overexpressing mouse PFC (HuD-OE-Myc) and WT littermates (WT-Ctrl). Input and IgG control is also shown. l Relative to IgG control circHomer1a levels based on qRT-PCR following RIP (anti-Myc) in human HuD-OE-Myc and WT littermates (WT-Ctrl). m Mean ± SEM relative to WT circHomer1a levels in frontal cortex synaptosomes and total frontal cortex isolates (PFC total) from HuD-OE and HUD-KO mice. h, i: *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, two-tailed one samples t-test. In all bar graphs the individual replicates or the number of replicates is shown within the graph.

RBPs have been shown to bind to circRNAs and are hypothesized to contribute to circRNA intracellular trafficking. In silico analysis of RBP/circRNA interactions predicted three strong binding sites within the mature circHomer1a sequence for HuD (Fig. 3j), a member of the ELAV family of RBPs that has been shown to influence neurite and synaptic trafficking of neuronal mRNAs [57, 58]. Moreover, the predicted HuD binding sites were very much conserved between mouse and human (two sites had 100% sequence conservation and one had a single nucleotide change from T to C, which is not predicted to affect the binding site—Fig. 3j). Of note, we found that overall mouse mature circHomer1a had a 93.5% sequence conservation compared with human (Fig. 3j). To validate RBP binding to circHomer1a, we performed RNA immunoprecipitation (RIP) with an anti-myc antibody in the PFC of mice overexpressing a human myc-tagged HuD isoform (HuD-OE) under the control of a forebrain-specific promoter [46] (Fig. 3k). Analysis of circHomer1a abundance in RIP vs IgG controls revealed that HuD indeed binds to circHomer1a (Fig. 3k, l). Given the known role of HuD in synaptic plasticity and RNA transport [57], we decided to examine the effects of HuD overexpression and knockdown in total and synaptic circHomer1a levels. Our results showed that, although total circHomer1a expression was unchanged in HuD-OE and HuD-KO mouse frontal cortex [58], synaptic circHomer1a levels were significantly upregulated in the frontal cortex of HuD-OE mice and displayed a trend for reduced expression in HuD-KO mice (Fig. 3m). Given that a previous study had suggested that HuD can bind to Homer1a mRNA in an activity-dependent manner [58] and since multiple Homer1 mRNA isoforms use exons 2–5 (see Fig. 3a), we quantified the capacity of Homer1 mRNA isoforms to bind to HuD and the changes in their total and synaptic expression following OE of KO of HuD. We found that Homer1a binds to HuD, in accordance to the literature [58], with Homer1b mRNA showing a trend for enrichment following RIP and Homer1c shown to not bind to HuD (Supplementary Fig. 7c). Furthermore, total Homer1a but not Homer1b and Homer1c mRNA expression was reduced in HuD-OE mouse frontal cortex, whereas synaptic expression of all three Homer1 isoforms was upregulated in the frontal cortex of HuD-KO mice (in contrast to circHomer1a, whose synaptic expression is reduced in HuD-KO mice; Supplementary Fig. 7d–f). Of note, synaptic Homer1b mRNA expression was found to be differentially altered in the frontal cortex of both HuD-OE and HuD-KO mice in a manner that was opposite to what was observed for circHomer1a (Supplementary Fig. 7e). We thus conclude that circHomer1a is a neuronal-enriched circRNA that is capable of binding to HuD, which can also interact with specific linear Homer1 mRNA isoforms.

In vivo OFC circHomer1a knockdown impairs OFC-mediated behavioral flexibility

Because of the very large size of introns 1 and 5, which are predicted to be necessary for circHomer1a backsplicing (see also Fig. 3a) [13, 21, 43, 44], and the fact that they are also needed for linear Homer1 expression, we are not able to specifically affect circHomer1a backsplicing by deleting introns 1 and 5 with genome editing. However, aiming at the unique mature circHomer1a splice junction between exons 5 and 2 (see Figs. 1d and 3a), we designed an shRNA that can specifically knock down the mouse mature (spliced) circHomer1a sequence, without directly targeting linear Homer1 mRNAs (Fig. 4a; see also Supplementary “Material and Methods”). So as to avoid any partial inhibition on the expression of the linear mRNAs stemming from mouse Homer1, we used a uniquely designed circRNA-specific shRNA approach that targets the splice junction in an asymmetric way between the two exons (Fig. 4a). Such an asymmetric shRNA design does not permit any significant complementarity between the 5′ “seed” sequence of the circHomer1a shRNA (nucleotides 2–7) and either exon 2 or exon 5 of linear Homer1 mRNAs, which when present could result in miRNA-like translational inhibition and subsequent mRNA decay (Fig. 4a).

Fig. 4: CircHomer1a regulates OFC-mediated reversal learning.
figure4

a Schematic of circRNA-specific shRNA knockdown design for mouse circHomer1a. The shRNA targeting the circHomer1a splice junction is asymmetrically complimentary with the 5′ of exon 2 and the 3 of exon 5, which participate in the creation of circHomer1a via backsplicing and covalent joining (upper). The same shRNA does not cause have any significant complementarity with either exon 2 and exon 3 when present in any linear Homer1 mRNA to cause degradation or miRNA-like translational inhibition and subsequent decay (only nucleotides 1–6 in the 5′ “seed sequence” of the shRNA are complementary with the 5′ of exon 2). b Hit-Map of injection locations for sh-Control (blue) and sh-circHomer1 (pink). Coordinates are anterior from Bregma: AP + 2.6, ML ±  1.35, DV −2.7. Inset shows representative lentiviral-mediated expression of an shRNA/human synapsin promoter-driven GFP-expressing vector in mouse OFC. Scale bar = 50µm. Mean ± SEM relative to scrambled shRNA control (sh-Control) mouse circHomer1a (c) and Homer1 mRNA isoform (d) levels after shRNA-mediated circHomer1a knockdown (sh-circHomer1) in mouse OFC. #0.10 < p < 0.05, *p < 0.05, two-tailed one sample t-test relative to sh-Control mean. All data were normalized to 18S rRNA. e Lower: Stages of touch-screen reversal learning behavioral paradigm. Discrimination criterion = ≥ 85% correct, early reversal = first session of reversal with performance <20%, chance reversal = 50% correct, Reversal criterion = ≥ 85% correct. Upper: Image from an example of a touch-screen-based reversal learning trial is shown on the right. Trials are initiated through a lever press [1], which leads to the onset of the pairwise stimuli on a touch sensitive screen [2]. Touch of the rewarded stimulus results in delivery of reward in the magazine [3] concomitant with 1 s tone and illumination of the magazine light. Touches at the unrewarded stimulus lead to illumination of the house light [4] with a 10 s timeout for an incorrect response. Error choices are followed by correction trials in which a subsequent initiation led to the stimuli presented in the same spatial orientation until a correct response is made to prevent side-bias and measure perseveration. f Behavioral paradigm intervention and injection timeline. After training, lentiviral injection with circHomer1a or scrambled control shRNA, and 2 weeks of recovery, discrimination, and reversal learning trials were carried out. In vivo knockdown of circHomer1a in mouse OFC does not alter reaction time to choose between stimuli (choice) or retrieve a reward (magazine) during both discrimination (g) and reversal learning (h). In vivo knockdown of circHomer1a in mouse OFC does not alter the number of trials needed for discrimination (i), early (j), and late (l) reversal but significantly increases the number of trials for chance reversal learning (k). Trial numbers are separated in lose–shift, win–stay, perseverative, and regressive. Bar graphs in gi represent mean ± SEM and display the number of replicates within. **p < 0.01 following two-way ANOVA. In all bar graphs the individual replicates or the number of replicates are shown within the graph.

To that end, we first performed in vivo circHomer1a knockdown in adult mouse OFC via lentiviral transduction of circHomer1a shRNA (sh-circHomer1) and scrambled control shRNA (sh-Control) vectors, which also expressed GFP via the human Synapsin promoter (Fig. 4b and Supplementary Fig. 8a, b). Transducing mouse neuronal cultures, we found that sh-circHomer1 was able to reduce the expression of circHomer1a by approximately twofold without affecting the levels of any of the known mouse linear Homer1 mRNA isoforms (Supplementary Fig. 8c, d). In vivo lentiviral transduction in the OFC achieved an approximate 40% reduction in circHomer1a levels in sh-circHomer1 vs sh-Control injected mice (Fig. 4c). Given that, as described above, our shRNA approach does not interfere with backsplicing and circRNA synthesis, but acts by specifically degrading the mature exonic circHomer1a sequences, we did not observe, as expected from our culture data, any changes in the linear Homer1 mRNA isoforms Homer1a, Homer1b, and Homer1c (Fig. 4d).

Patients with BD or SCZ exhibit cognitive deficits related to OFC function with the most notable being disturbances in cognitive flexibility, which is the capacity to promptly adapt one’s behavior when circumstances change [40,41,42]. Cognitive flexibility is best assessed through reversal learning tests, during which subjects are initially trained and rewarded to discriminate one visual cue from another until they reach a criterion level of performance. Then the designation of the correct (rewarded) vs incorrect visual cue gets switched and subjects are tested in their capacity to adjust their behavior [42]. Mice can be trained to perform similar OFC-dependent reversal learning behavioral tests with touch-screen learning paradigms and concomitant in vivo electrophysiological recordings [59,60,61]. A recent paper suggested that, during the criterion discrimination phase of a touch-screen reversal learning paradigm, OFC neuronal firing appears to track rewarded responses following a previously rewarded choice (win–stay) when behavior is well learned, but shifts to predominantly track repeated errors in early reversal and switches to track unexpected rewards at chance reversal [61]. Interestingly, NMDA receptor knockout in the OFC or lesions in the OFC can completely abrogate reversal learning [59]. Mouse circHomer1a is robustly increased in adult mouse brain relative to fetal brain and the frontal cortex displays the highest levels of circHomer1a (Fig. 3b), suggesting that deficits in circHomer1a in the OFC might have significant consequences. We employed a touch-screen reversal learning paradigm (Fig. 4e, f) in mice injected with sh-circHomer1 and sh-Control expressing lentiviruses in the OFC. We found that circHomer1a knockdown in the OFC did not interfere with response latency for retrieving the reward (magazine) and time to choose stimulus (choice), suggesting no motivation and motor abnormalities, respectively (Fig. 4g, h). Interestingly, we found that circHomer1a knockdown significantly impaired chance reversal learning (in which the percentage of correct responding is between 30 and 60 percent—see also Fig. 4f), without influencing discrimination learning as well as the early (perseverative) and late (criterion) stages of reversal learning (Fig. 4i–l). Moreover, the increase in the number of trials needed for chance reversal in mice with in vivo circHomer1a knockdown were observed in all four types of choice combinations (lose–shift, win–stay, perseverative, and regressive) (Fig. 4k). Of note, there was no significant difference between sh-circHomer1 and sh-Control total activity level over the entire 48 h period as shown by home-cage monitoring, indicating that circHomer1a knockdown does not impact locomotor activity in a familiar, home-cage environment (Supplementary Fig. 9a). Moreover, no significant differences were observed on distance traveled, duration, and average velocity of travel in the novel open field, which suggests that localized knockdown of circHomer1a in the OFC does not alter locomotor activity or anxiety-like behavior in a novel environment (Supplementary Fig. 9b–e). Taken together, our data suggest that modest circHomer1a deficits in the OFC are sufficient to impair specific stages of reversal learning but do not alter discrimination, motor functions, motivation, and anxiety-like behavior.

In vivo knockdown of circHomer1a results in robust changes in alternative isoform abundance of synaptic plasticity- and psychiatric disease-associated genes

Given that circHomer1a knockdown does not interfere with Homer1 mRNA expression, we decided to perform deep RNA sequencing in OFC tissue extracted from a subset of sh-circHomer1 and sh-Control expressing mice used for the reversal learning experiments described above, so as to examine any trans effects on OFC gene expression as a result of circHomer1a deficits. Looking at total mRNA levels in the OFC of sh-circHomer1 and sh-Control, we found a very modest effect from circHomer1a knockdown in overall gene expression (no significant genes using a cutoff of 1.5-fold and q < 0.10; 19 reduced and 24 increased genes with p < 0.05 and 1.5-fold cutoffs—see also Fig. 5a). However, looking at alternative isoforms we found that circHomer1a knockdown in the OFC resulted in robust alterations (9 reduced and 18 increased genes using a cutoff of 1.5-fold and q < 0.10; 195 reduced and 269 increased genes with p < 0.05 and 1.5-fold cutoffs—see also Fig. 5b). Among these notably altered (q < 0.10) mRNA isoforms were isoforms from fragile X mental retardation 1 (Fmr1), sodium channel, voltage-gated, type I, alpha subunit (Scn1a), and Heat shock protein 90 kDa alpha (cytosolic), member A1 (Hsp90aa1) (reduced between 3- and 38-fold relative to sh-Control), proteasome subunit alpha type-4 (Psma4), Abl interactor 1 (Abi1), nuclear receptor co-repressor 2 (Ncor2), and voltage-dependent L-type calcium channel subunit beta-4 (Cacnb4) (increased between 4- and 14-fold relative to sh-Control), most of which are genes with strong links to psychiatric and neurodevelopmental disorders and synaptic function and neuronal excitability (Fig. 5b) [62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72]. Of note, two different isoforms from Circadian Locomotor Output Cycles Kaput (Clock), a gene involved in circadian rhythms and linked to depression and BD [73,74,75], were found to be differently altered (one more than threefold reduced and one more than fourfold increased) by circHomer1a knockdown (Fig. 5b). Importantly, analysis of potential off-target effects of circHomer1a knockdown via partially complementary interactions with circHomer1a shRNA revealed no significant results (0 mRNAs and 0 mRNA isoforms predicted to partially bind in their 3′UTR with the seed-sequence of the circHomer1a shRNA—q < 0.10 cutoff).

Fig. 5: In vivo circHomer1a knockdown in the OFC alters the expression of mRNA isoforms from genes involved in neuronal function and psychiatric disease.
figure5

Volcano plots showing differential mRNA (a) and mRNA isoform (b) expression in the OFC of sh-circHomer1 vs sh-Control expressing mice (x-axis = relative to control log2 fold changes; y-axis: negative log10 of the q values). Vertical lines correspond to >2-fold changes, and the horizontal line represents q < 0.10. Pathway analysis of altered mRNA isoforms (cd) or mRNAs (e) in sh-circHomer1 vs sh-Control OFC samples (RNA sequencing) based on ingenuity pathway analysis. Information on molecular expression/interactions/relationships are shown in the graph. f Mean ± SEM relative to scrambled shRNA control (sh-Control) mouse Psma4-207 and Psma4-201 mRNA isoform levels after shRNA-mediated circHomer1a knockdown (sh-circHomer1) in mouse OFC. *p < 0.05, two-tailed one sample t-test relative to sh-Control mean. Data are based on isoform-specific qRT-PCR and are normalized to 18S rRNA. g List of significantly altered in the OFC mRNA isoforms (q < 0.10, fold change > 1.25) following in vivo circHomer1a knockdown. Information on fold change, p value, q value, directions of change, and isoform length (yes = longest mRNA isoform in the OFC; no = not the longest expressed in the OFC isoform) is included. h Graph showing relative to sh-Control mRNA isoform levels from 11 genes that have both up- and down-regulated mRNA isoforms differentially expressed in the OF of sh-circHomer1 mice (genes with altered mRNA isoforms from the list shown in g were chosen and those that displayed significant increased and decreased mRNA isoform expression include; cutoff for this comparison was dropped to p < 0.05).

In order to examine the molecular pathways that could be formed following circHomer1a knockdown in the OFC we ran Ingenuity Pathway analysis on differentially expressed mRNA isoforms and genes (cutoff lowered to p < 0.05). Our results showed that differentially expressed mRNA isoforms are involved in synaptic transmission, long term synaptic depression, excitation of neurons, and prepulse inhibition (Fig. 5c, d). On the other hand, differentially expressed mRNAs were associated with major depression (Fig. 5e). Moreover, an overall significant enrichment for SCZ GWAS genes was observed in significantly altered mRNA isoforms (p = 0.0393, x2 = 3.095). Furthermore, using mRNA isoform-specific qRT-PCR, we validated that the Psma4-207 mRNA isoform (but not the longest Psma4-201 isoform) was specifically increased in the OFC following circHomer1a knockdown, as shown by RNA-Seq (Fig. 5f). Intriguingly, we noticed that only 1 out of 18 mRNA isoforms significantly increased in the OFC following circHomer1a knockdown (q < 0.10 and fold change >1.25) happened to be the longest expressed in the OFC isoforms per coding region sequence size (Fig. 5g). On the other hand, five out of nine of the downregulated mRNAs isoforms were the longest of the expressed in the OFC isoforms (Fig. 5g). Notably, this effect of size transcript was significant following a two-tailed chi-squared test with Yates correction (p = 0.0141, x2 = 6.027). Furthermore, dysregulation in 11 out of these 27 significantly altered mRNA isoforms appeared to involve two differentially altered isoforms (one increased and one decreased; cutoff reduced to p < 0.05 for the second isoforms) (Fig. 5h). We conclude that circHomer1a knockdown in the OFC results in differential expression of mRNA isoforms from genes related to synaptic function and psychiatric disease.

Discussion

Emerging data suggest that circRNAs are enriched in the brain, expressed in synapses, and preferentially generated from synaptic-related genes. However, little is known about their importance for brain function and behavior, and more importantly for their role in brain disorders. Here, we provide novel evidence that circHomer1a, a highly expressed, neuronal-enriched, and evolutionary conserved circRNA originating from HOMER1, a gene known to regulate neuronal excitability and synaptic plasticity and linked to psychiatric disorders, is reduced in the OFC and stem cell-derived neuronal cultures of both BD and SCZ patients. Furthermore, we show that circHomer1a levels are also reduced in the DLPFC of subjects with SCZ and that changes in circHomer1a in both DLPFC and OFC are significantly positively correlated with the age of onset of SCZ. We also demonstrate that these alterations in circHomer1a and associations with the age of onset of SCZ are not observed in linear HOMER1 mRNA levels, suggesting a circRNA-specific effect. Moreover, we provide evidence that circHomer1a is developmentally regulated and enriched in the frontal cortex, and that it binds to the RBP HuD, which in turn affects circHomer1a synaptic levels within the frontal cortex. Using in vivo circHomer1a-specific knockdown in mouse OFC we show that circHomer1a is necessary for OFC-mediated cognitive flexibility and that it robustly alters the expression of numerous mRNA isoforms from genes involved in synaptic function and psychiatric disease, a subset of which display differential alternative isoform alterations. Collectively, our results combine novel molecular and behavioral data to shed light into the unexplored role of circRNAs in psychiatric disease.

Given the robust reductions of circHomer1a in the OFC and the relevance of this brain region for cognitive flexibility, our data showing specific behavioral deficits in reversal learning following in vivo circHomer1a knockdown suggest the possibility that dysregulation of this circRNA in the brain of subjects with BD or SCZ could be associated with some of the cognitive disturbances observed in these psychiatric disorders. Interestingly, multiple studies suggest that alterations in reversal learning have also been observed in patients with BD and SCZ [76,77,78,79,80]. Moreover, the observed reductions of circHomer1a in both the OFC and DLPFC of patients with SCZ suggest that its alterations in SCZ could be more widespread than in BD, which is in accordance with previous reports on miRNA dysregulation in multiple PFC regions in SCZ [11]. Given the significant positive correlation between circHomer1a and the age of onset of SCZ in both the OFC and DLPFC (the earlier the onset the more robust the reduction in circHomer1a) and the alteration on numerous mRNA isoforms strongly linked to psychiatric disease and control of neuronal function, such as Psma4, Fmr1, and Cacnb4, it is tempting to hypothesize that deficits in circHomer1a within the PFC could contribute to the disturbances in synaptic plasticity and glutamatergic neurotransmission that have been observed in SCZ [4,5,6,7,8]. It is also possible, given the activity-dependent nature of circHomer1a [25], that in some cases circHomer1a deficits in SCZ or BD are downstream of overall disturbances in synaptic plasticity and neuronal excitability, such as those related to NMDA hypofunction, dopamine and calcium signaling, or GABAergic dysfunction. Indeed, previous studies in iPS cell-derived neuronal cultures from BD patients have suggested the existence of hyperexcitable neuronal responses, including increases in baseline excitatory postsynaptic current frequency, which could be partly ameliorated through mood stabilizer treatment [30, 31]. Future work is needed to examine upstream regulators of circHomer1a alterations in psychiatric disease and the potential regulatory role of circHomer1a in activity-dependent synaptic plasticity.

Homer1 mRNAs are well-established effectors of neuronal excitability and synaptic plasticity, including SCZ and depression [35,36,37,38,39]. Our data showing that circHomer1a, but not linear HOMER1 mRNA, is altered in the PFC and stem cell-derived neuronal cultures of subjects with SCZ and BD, is associated with the age of onset of SCZ, and could influence the abundance of numerous mRNA isoforms known to regulate synaptic transmission, introduce a novel potential upstream regulator of neuronal function within the PFC stemming from the HOMER1 gene. Moreover, given that changes in neuronal activity [59, 60] have been shown to disrupt the ability of the OFC to mediate behavioral flexibility, it is tempting to hypothesize that such circHomer1a-mediated disturbances in OFC neuronal function-related gene expression could be implicated in the impaired reversal learning phenotype seen following in vivo circHomer1a knockdown in the OFC.

A common misconception is that most circRNAs act as sponges for miRNAs similar to what has been previously reported for CDR1as, which has tens of partial complementary sites for miR-7 [17, 22]. In reality, circRNA sequences are not enriched in miRNA target sites [25] and given their overall lower expression, they are unlikely to have a significant physiological impact on miRNA abundance via a single miRNA binding site. However, circRNAs are known to have many other functions ranging from effects on transcription and splicing and stability to protein expression and localization [81]. Indeed, the mature sequence of circHomer1a did not exhibit multiple miRNA sites for any miRNA based on in silico analysis [43]. Our findings that circHomer1a knockdown in the OFC preferentially upregulated the expression of shorter mRNA isoforms and resulted in differential expression of short and long isoforms for a subset of genes are suggestive of potential effects of circHomer1a in alternative splicing. It is tempting to hypothesize that the binding of circHomer1a to RBPs that regulate alternative splicing, such as HuD [82], could contribute to the observed alterations in alternative mRNA isoform expression. Future work is needed to elucidate the exact molecular mechanisms that could underlie circHomer1a-mediated effects in neuronal gene expression.

One limitation of our study is that it was possible to design only a single shRNA that can target the mouse circHomer1a splice junction in an asymmetric manner so as to not partially inhibit linear Homer1 mRNA levels via miRNA-like partial complementarity (see also Fig. 4a). So although the shRNA used in our study was able to specifically inhibit circHomer1a but not linear Homer1 mRNA expression and was not predicted to have any notable off-target effects in the OFC based on analysis of the mouse OFC RNA-sequencing data, additional methods able to specifically manipulate circHomer1a expression are needed to exclude the possibility of off-target effects contributing to our observed physiological and behavioral assessments. An additional limitation of our study is that we only had postmortem samples from two brain regions of a single cohort in our possession, so it was not possible to measure if the robust deficits in circHomer1a expression observed in the OFC could be widespread in the majority of patients with SCZ and BD. Moreover, based on our data, we do not anticipate antipsychotic treatment to directly result in notable circHomer1a alterations, with the exception of mood stabilizers, such as VPA, which could upregulate circHomer1a expression. We do consider it possible, though, that antipsychotic and mood stabilizer treatment could ameliorate some of the circHomer1a-mediated changes in synaptic function and neuronal excitability-related gene expression through mechanisms independent of circHomer1a.

Although our study is the first to examine circRNA alterations in the OFC of either BD or SCZ patients, the DLPFC of BD patients, and in stem cell-derived neuronal cultures of subjects with BD and SCZ, two recent studies used circRNA annotation approaches to pool circRNA expression data from existing RNA-sequencing databased from the DLPFC of subjects with SCZ [27, 28]. The first of these two studies using a smaller cohort found no changes in circHomer1a but reductions in other circRNAs and the second study that combined RNA-sequencing data from multiple cohorts found a non-significant reduction in circHomer1a [27, 28]. However, none of these two studies measured circHomer1a expression with circRNA-specific qRT-PCR, which is currently the standard method to accurate quantify circRNA expression [28, 83]. Additional studies using circRNA-specific qRT-PCR in multiple postmortem cohorts with more detailed information on antipsychotic and mood stabilizer treatment are required to determine whether alterations in circHomer1a are widespread in multiple brain regions in patients with psychiatric disorders and whether there are any notable effects from psychiatric drug treatment. Furthermore, in light of a recent study showing reductions in circHomer1a expression in postmortem brains of subjects with Alzheimer’s disease to be associated with disease-related neuropathological and cognitive dysfunction scores [84], we anticipate circHomer1a-mediated control of gene expression to also be of relevance for neurological disorders.

Taken together our data introduce a neuronal- and frontal cortex-enriched circRNA as a novel molecular player with links to neuropsychiatric disorders that is consistently altered in SCZ and BD OFC and patient stem cell-derived neuronal cultures and is capable of modulating synaptic gene expression and OFC-mediated cognition. Combined our work provides the first evidence supporting the importance of circRNAs altered in psychiatric disorders in disease-related disturbances in synaptic gene expression and PFC-mediated behavior.

References

  1. 1.

    Kessler RC, Chiu WT, Demler O, Merikangas KR, Walters EE. Prevalence, severity, and comorbidity of 12-month DSM-IV disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005;62:617–27.

  2. 2.

    Merikangas KR, Akiskal HS, Angst J, Greenberg PE, Hirschfeld RM, Petukhova M, et al. Lifetime and 12-month prevalence of bipolar spectrum disorder in the National Comorbidity Survey replication. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2007;64:543–52.

  3. 3.

    Vigo D, Thornicroft G, Atun R. Estimating the true global burden of mental illness. Lancet Psychiatry. 2016;3:171–8.

  4. 4.

    Crabtree GW, Gogos JA. Synaptic plasticity, neural circuits, and the emerging role of altered short-term information processing in schizophrenia. Front Synaptic Neurosci. 2014;6:28.

  5. 5.

    Egan MF, Straub RE, Goldberg TE, Yakub I, Callicott JH, Hariri AR, et al. Variation in GRM3 affects cognition, prefrontal glutamate, and risk for schizophrenia. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004;101:12604–9.

  6. 6.

    Schloesser RJ, Huang J, Klein PS, Manji HK. Cellular plasticity cascades in the pathophysiology and treatment of bipolar disorder. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2008;33:110–33.

  7. 7.

    Tsai G, Passani LA, Slusher BS, Carter R, Baer L, Kleinman JE, et al. Abnormal excitatory neurotransmitter metabolism in schizophrenic brains. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1995;52:829–36.

  8. 8.

    Hashimoto R, Tankou S, Takeda M, Sawa A. Postsynaptic density: a key convergent site for schizophrenia susceptibility factors and possible target for drug development. Drugs Today. 2007;43:645–54.

  9. 9.

    Barry G, Briggs JA, Vanichkina DP, Poth EM, Beveridge NJ, Ratnu VS, et al. The long non-coding RNA Gomafu is acutely regulated in response to neuronal activation and involved in schizophrenia-associated alternative splicing. Mol Psychiatry. 2014;19:486–94.

  10. 10.

    Bavamian S, Mellios N, Lalonde J, Fass DM, Wang J, Sheridan SD, et al. Dysregulation of miR-34a links neuronal development to genetic risk factors for bipolar disorder. Mol Psychiatry. 2015;20:573–84.

  11. 11.

    Mellios N, Sur M. The emerging role of microRNAs in schizophrenia and autism spectrum disorders. Front Psychiatry. 2012;25:39.

  12. 12.

    Xu B, Hsu PK, Stark KL, Karayiorgou M, Gogos JA. Derepression of a neuronal inhibitor due to miRNA dysregulation in a schizophrenia-related microdeletion. Cell. 2013;152:262–75.

  13. 13.

    Dai X, Zhang N, Cheng Y, Yang T, Chen Y, Liu Z, et al. RNA-binding protein trinucleotide repeat-containing 6A regulates the formation of circular RNA circ0006916, with important functions in lung cancer cells. Carcinogenesis. 2018;39:981–92.

  14. 14.

    Barrett SP, Wang PL, Salzman J. Circular RNA biogenesis can proceed through an exon-containing lariat precursor. Elife. 2015;4:e07540.

  15. 15.

    Conn SJ, Pillman KA, Toubia J, Conn VM, Salmanidis M, Phillips CA, et al. The RNA binding protein quaking regulates formation of circRNAs. Cell. 2015;160:1125–34.

  16. 16.

    Guo JU, Agarwal V, Guo H, Bartel DP. Expanded identification and characterization of mammalian circular RNAs. Genome Biol. 2014;15:409.

  17. 17.

    Hansen TB, Jensen TI, Clausen BH, Bramsen JB, Finsen B, Damgaard CK, et al. Natural RNA circles function as efficient microRNA sponges. Nature. 2013;495:384–8.

  18. 18.

    Jeck WR, Sharpless NE. Detecting and characterizing circular RNAs. Nat Biotechnol. 2014;32:453–61.

  19. 19.

    Jeck WR, Sorrentino JA, Wang K, Slevin MK, Burd CE, Liu J, et al. Circular RNAs are abundant, conserved, and associated with ALU repeats. RNA. 2013;19:141–57.

  20. 20.

    Li Z, Huang C, Bao C, Chen L, Lin M, Wang X, et al. Exon-intron circular RNAs regulate transcription in the nucleus. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2015;22:256–64.

  21. 21.

    Liang D, Wilusz JE. Short intronic repeat sequences facilitate circular RNA production. Genes Dev 2014;28:2233–47.

  22. 22.

    Memczak S, Jens M, Elefsinioti A, Torti F, Krueger J, Rybak A, et al. Circular RNAs are a large class of animal RNAs with regulatory potency. Nature. 2013;495:333–8.

  23. 23.

    Salzman J, Gawad C, Wang PL, Lacayo N, Brown PO. Circular RNAs are the predominant transcript isoform from hundreds of human genes in diverse cell types. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e30733.

  24. 24.

    Rybak-Wolf A, Stottmeister C, Glazar P, Jens M, Pino N, Giusti S, et al. Circular RNAs in the mammalian brain are highly abundant, conserved, and dynamically expressed. Mol Cell. 2015;58:870–85.

  25. 25.

    You X, Vlatkovic I, Babic A, Will T, Epstein I, Tushev G, et al. Neural circular RNAs are derived from synaptic genes and regulated by development and plasticity. Nat Neurosci. 2015;18:603–10.

  26. 26.

    Piwecka M, Glazar P, Hernandez-Miranda LR, Memczak S, Wolf SA, Rybak-Wolf A, et al. Loss of a mammalian circular RNA locus causes miRNA deregulation and affects brain function. Science. 2017;357:eaam8526.

  27. 27.

    Mahmoudi E, Fitzsimmons C, Geaghan MP, Shannon Weickert C, Atkins JR, Wang X, et al. Circular RNA biogenesis is decreased in postmortem cortical gray matter in schizophrenia and may alter the bioavailability of associated miRNA. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2019;44:1043–54.

  28. 28.

    Liu Z, Ran Y, Tao C, Li S, Chen J, Yang E. Detection of circular RNA expression and related quantitative trait loci in the human dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Genome Biol. 2019;20:99.

  29. 29.

    Zhang Y, Du L, Bai Y, Han B, He C, Gong L, et al. CircDYM ameliorates depressive-like behavior by targeting miR-9 to regulate microglial activation via HSP90 ubiquitination. Mol Psychiatry. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-018-0285-0.

  30. 30.

    Mertens J, Wang QW, Kim Y, Yu DX, Pham S, Yang B, et al. Pharmacogenomics of bipolar disorder S, Mi S, Brennand KJ, Kelsoe JR, Gage FH, Yao J. Differential responses to lithium in hyperexcitable neurons from patients with bipolar disorder. Nature. 2015;527:95–9.

  31. 31.

    Stern S, Santos R, Marchetto MC, Mendes AP, Rouleau GA, Biesmans S, et al. Neurons derived from patients with bipolar disorder divide into intrinsically different sub-populations of neurons, predicting the patients' responsiveness to lithium. Mol Psychiatry. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1038/mp.2016.260.

  32. 32.

    Kamiya A, Kubo K, Tomoda T, Takaki M, Youn R, Ozeki Y, et al. A schizophrenia-associated mutation of DISC1 perturbs cerebral cortex development. Nat Cell Biol. 2005;7:1167–78.

  33. 33.

    Kim JY, Liu CY, Zhang F, Duan X, Wen Z, Song J, et al. Interplay between DISC1 and GABA signaling regulates neurogenesis in mice and risk for schizophrenia. Cell. 2012;148:1051–64.

  34. 34.

    Duan X, Chang JH, Ge S, Faulkner RL, Kim JY, Kitabatake Y, et al. Disrupted-In-Schizophrenia 1 regulates integration of newly generated neurons in the adult brain. Cell 2007;130:1146–58.

  35. 35.

    Hu JH, Park JM, Park S, Xiao B, Dehoff MH, Kim S, et al. Homeostatic scaling requires group I mGluR activation mediated by Homer1a. Neuron. 2010;68:1128–42.

  36. 36.

    Klugmann M, Symes CW, Leichtlein CB, Klaussner BK, Dunning J, Fong D, et al. AAV-mediated hippocampal expression of short and long Homer 1 proteins differentially affect cognition and seizure activity in adult rats. Mol Cell Neurosci. 2005;28:347–60.

  37. 37.

    Lominac KD, Oleson EB, Pava M, Klugmann M, Schwarz MK, Seeburg PH, et al. Distinct roles for different Homer1 isoforms in behaviors and associated prefrontal cortex function. J Neurosci. 2005;25:11586–94.

  38. 38.

    Szumlinski KK, Kalivas PW, Worley PF. Homer proteins: implications for neuropsychiatric disorders. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2006;16:251–7.

  39. 39.

    Szumlinski KK, Lominac KD, Kleschen MJ, Oleson EB, Dehoff MH, Schwarz MK, et al. Behavioral and neurochemical phenotyping of Homer1 mutant mice: possible relevance to schizophrenia. Genes Brain Behav. 2005;4:273–88.

  40. 40.

    Reddy LF, Waltz JA, Green MF, Wynn JK, Horan WP. Probabilistic reversal learning in schizophrenia: stability of deficits and potential causal mechanisms. Schizophr Bull. 2016;42:942–51.

  41. 41.

    Jackowski AP, Araujo Filho GM, Almeida AG, Araujo CM, Reis M, Nery F, et al. The involvement of the orbitofrontal cortex in psychiatric disorders: an update of neuroimaging findings. Rev Bras Psiquiatr. 2012;34:207–12.

  42. 42.

    Izquierdo A, Brigman JL, Radke AK, Rudebeck PH, Holmes A. The neural basis of reversal learning: an updated perspective. Neuroscience. 2017;345:12–26.

  43. 43.

    Dudekula DB, Panda AC, Grammatikakis I, De S, Abdelmohsen K, Gorospe M. CircInteractome: a web tool for exploring circular RNAs and their interacting proteins and microRNAs. RNA Biol. 2016;13:34–42.

  44. 44.

    Glazar P, Papavasileiou P, Rajewsky N. circBase: a database for circular RNAs. RNA. 2014;20:1666–70.

  45. 45.

    Bolognani F, Contente-Cuomo T, Perrone-Bizzozero NI. Novel recognition motifs and biological functions of the RNA-binding protein HuD revealed by genome-wide identification of its targets. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010;38:117–30.

  46. 46.

    Akamatsu W, Fujihara H, Mitsuhashi T, Yano M, Shibata S, Hayakawa Y, et al. The RNA-binding protein HuD regulates neuronal cell identity and maturation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102:4625–30.

  47. 47.

    Torrey EF, Webster M, Knable M, Johnston N, Yolken RH. The stanley foundation brain collection and neuropathology consortium. Schizophr Res. 2000;44:151–5.

  48. 48.

    Mellios N, Feldman DA, Sheridan SD, Ip JPK, Kwok S, Amoah SK, et al. MeCP2-regulated miRNAs control early human neurogenesis through differential effects on ERK and AKT signaling. Mol Psychiatry. 2018;23:1051–65.

  49. 49.

    Mellios N, Sugihara H, Castro J, Banerjee A, Le C, Kumar A, et al. miR-132, an experience-dependent microRNA, is essential for visual cortex plasticity. Nat Neurosci. 2011;14:1240–2.

  50. 50.

    Zhang XO, Wang HB, Zhang Y, Lu X, Chen LL, Yang L. Complementary sequence-mediated exon circularization. Cell. 2014;159:134–47.

  51. 51.

    Zhang Y, Zhang XO, Chen T, Xiang JF, Yin QF, Xing YH, et al. Circular intronic long noncoding RNAs. Mol Cell 2013;51:792–806.

  52. 52.

    Stein JL, de la Torre-Ubieta L, Tian Y, Parikshak NN, Hernandez IA, Marchetto MC, et al. A quantitative framework to evaluate modeling of cortical development by neural stem cells. Neuron. 2014;83:69–86.

  53. 53.

    Floruta CM, Du R, Kang H, Stein JL, Weick JP. Default patterning produces pan-cortical glutamatergic and CGE/LGE-like GABAergic neurons from human pluripotent stem cells. Stem Cell Rep. 2017;9:1463–76.

  54. 54.

    Durrenberger PF, Fernando S, Kashefi SN, Ferrer I, Hauw JJ, Seilhean D, et al. Effects of antemortem and postmortem variables on human brain mRNA quality: a BrainNet Europe study. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2010;69:70–81.

  55. 55.

    Mellios N, Huang HS, Baker SP, Galdzicka M, Ginns E, Akbarian S. Molecular determinants of dysregulated GABAergic gene expression in the prefrontal cortex of subjects with schizophrenia. Biol Psychiatry. 2009;65:1006–14.

  56. 56.

    Hoffman GE, Hartley BJ, Flaherty E, Ladran I, Gochman P, Ruderfer DM, et al. Transcriptional signatures of schizophrenia in hiPSC-derived NPCs and neurons are concordant with post-mortem adult brains. Nat Commun. 2017;8:222556.

  57. 57.

    Perrone-Bizzozero N, Bird CW. Role of HuD in nervous system function and pathology. Front Biosci. 2013;5:554–63.

  58. 58.

    Tiruchinapalli DM, Ehlers MD, Keene JD. Activity-dependent expression of RNA binding protein HuD and its association with mRNAs in neurons. RNA Biol. 2008;5:157–68.

  59. 59.

    Brigman JL, Daut RA, Wright T, Gunduz-Cinar O, Graybeal C, Davis MI, et al. GluN2B in corticostriatal circuits governs choice learning and choice shifting. Nat Neurosci. 2013;16:1101–10.

  60. 60.

    Chudasama Y, Robbins TW. Dissociable contributions of the orbitofrontal and infralimbic cortex to pavlovian autoshaping and discrimination reversal learning: further evidence for the functional heterogeneity of the rodent frontal cortex. J Neurosci. 2003;23:8771–80.

  61. 61.

    Marquardt K, Sigdel R, Brigman JL. Touch-screen visual reversal learning is mediated by value encoding and signal propagation in the orbitofrontal cortex. Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2017;139:179–88.

  62. 62.

    Fry AE, Rees E, Thompson R, Mantripragada K, Blake P, Jones G, et al. Pathogenic copy number variants and SCN1A mutations in patients with intellectual disability and childhood-onset epilepsy. BMC Med Genet. 2016;17:34.

  63. 63.

    Heck A, Fastenrath M, Ackermann S, Auschra B, Bickel H, Coynel D, et al. Converging genetic and functional brain imaging evidence links neuronal excitability to working memory, psychiatric disease, and brain activity. Neuron. 2014;81:1203–13.

  64. 64.

    Heyes S, Pratt WS, Rees E, Dahimene S, Ferron L, Owen MJ, et al. Genetic disruption of voltage-gated calcium channels in psychiatric and neurological disorders. Prog Neurobiol. 2015;134:36–54.

  65. 65.

    Ito H, Morishita R, Shinoda T, Iwamoto I, Sudo K, Okamoto K, et al. Dysbindin-1, WAVE2 and Abi-1 form a complex that regulates dendritic spine formation. Mol Psychiatry. 2010;15:976–86.

  66. 66.

    Lin M, Zhao D, Hrabovsky A, Pedrosa E, Zheng D, Lachman HM. Heat shock alters the expression of schizophrenia and autism candidate genes in an induced pluripotent stem cell model of the human telencephalon. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e94968.

  67. 67.

    MacDonald ML, Alhassan J, Newman JT, Richard M, Gu H, Kelly RM, et al. Selective loss of smaller spines in schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry. 2017;174:586–94.

  68. 68.

    Meisler MH, Kearney JA. Sodium channel mutations in epilepsy and other neurological disorders. J Clin Investig. 2005;115:2010–7.

  69. 69.

    Osaka H, Ogiwara I, Mazaki E, Okamura N, Yamashita S, Iai M, et al. Patients with a sodium channel alpha 1 gene mutation show wide phenotypic variation. Epilepsy Res. 2007;75:46–51.

  70. 70.

    Pardinas AF, Holmans P, Pocklington AJ, Escott-Price V, Ripke S, Carrera N, et al. Common schizophrenia alleles are enriched in mutation-intolerant genes and in regions under strong background selection. Nat Genet. 2018;50:381–9.

  71. 71.

    Schizophrenia Working Group of the Psychiatric Genomics C. Biological insights from 108 schizophrenia-associated genetic loci. Nature. 2014;511:421–7.

  72. 72.

    Zhou W, He Y, Rehman AU, Kong Y, Hong S, Ding G, et al. Loss of function of NCOR1 and NCOR2 impairs memory through a novel GABAergic hypothalamus-CA3 projection. Nat Neurosci. 2019;22:205–17.

  73. 73.

    Benedetti F, Serretti A, Colombo C, Barbini B, Lorenzi C, Campori E, et al. Influence of CLOCK gene polymorphism on circadian mood fluctuation and illness recurrence in bipolar depression. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet. 2003;123B:23–6.

  74. 74.

    Li JZ, Bunney BG, Meng F, Hagenauer MH, Walsh DM, Vawter MP, et al. Circadian patterns of gene expression in the human brain and disruption in major depressive disorder. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013;110:9950–5.

  75. 75.

    Loria-Kohen V, Espinosa-Salinas I, Marcos-Pasero H, Lourenco-Nogueira T, Herranz J, Molina S, et al. Polymorphism in the CLOCK gene may influence the effect of fat intake reduction on weight loss. Nutrition 2016;32:453–60.

  76. 76.

    Wegbreit E, Cushman GK, Weissman AB, Bojanek E, Kim KL, Leibenluft E, et al. Reversal-learning deficits in childhood-onset bipolar disorder across the transition from childhood to young adulthood. J Affect Disord. 2016;203:46–54.

  77. 77.

    Adleman NE, Kayser R, Dickstein D, Blair RJ, Pine D, Leibenluft E. Neural correlates of reversal learning in severe mood dysregulation and pediatric bipolar disorder. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2011;50:1173–85 e2.

  78. 78.

    Dickstein DP, Axelson D, Weissman AB, Yen S, Hunt JI, Goldstein BI, et al. Cognitive flexibility and performance in children and adolescents with threshold and sub-threshold bipolar disorder. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2016;25:625–38.

  79. 79.

    Liang S, Brown MRG, Deng W, Wang Q, Ma X, Li M, et al. Convergence and divergence of neurocognitive patterns in schizophrenia and depression. Schizophr Res. 2018;192:327–34.

  80. 80.

    Culbreth AJ, Gold JM, Cools R, Barch DM. Impaired activation in cognitive control regions predicts reversal learning in schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull. 2016;42:484–93.

  81. 81.

    Li X, Yang L, Chen LL. The biogenesis, functions, and challenges of circular RNAs. Mol Cell. 2018;71:428–42.

  82. 82.

    Zhou HL, Hinman MN, Barron VA, Geng C, Zhou G, Luo G, et al. Hu proteins regulate alternative splicing by inducing localized histone hyperacetylation in an RNA-dependent manner. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108:E627–35.

  83. 83.

    Salzman J, Chen RE, Olsen MN, Wang PL, Brown PO. Cell-type specific features of circular RNA expression. PLoS Genet. 2013;9:e1003777.

  84. 84.

    Dube U, Del-Aguila JL, Li Z, Budde JP, Jiang S, Hsu S, et al. An atlas of cortical circular RNA expression in Alzheimer disease brains demonstrates clinical and pathological associations. Nat Neurosci. 2019;22:1903–12.

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by a NARSAD Young Investigator Grant (FP00000839—NM) by the Brain & Behavior Research Foundation, a high priority short-term R56 award from the NIMH (1R56MH119150-01—NM) and a mentored PI grant as part of an P20 grant from the NIGMS (1P20GM121176-01—NM and SKA). KJB is a New York Stem Cell Foundation—Robertson Investigator. This work was partially supported by National Institute of Health (NIH) grants R01 MH101454, R01 MH106056, R33 MH087896, a Brain and Behavior Young Investigator Grant (KJB), the MGH Research Scholars Program (SJH), and the New York Stem Cell Foundation (KJB). We would like to thank the SMRI brainbank for providing us with postmortem brain specimen. We also like to thank Grigorios Papageorgiou, Samantha Galvan, Mate Fischer, Crina Floruta, and Eunice Amoah for technical assistance and Dr Fernando Valenzuela and Marvin Nayan for advice on the paper. We also want to thank Drs Hirotaka J. Okano, and Robert Darnell for providing HuD-KO mice. The authors gratefully acknowledge use of the Center of Biomedical Research Excellence (COBRE) data (P20GM103472) and the Function Biomedical Informatics Research Network (FBIRN) data. BA was supported by the Scientific and Technological Council of Turkey (2214/A) International Research Fellowship Program.

Author information

NM conceived the hypothesis, designed, performed, and supervised experiments, analyzed data, and wrote the paper. JLB, NPB, and JPW designed and supervised experiments and analyzed data. SJH, KJB, RHP, and MJW generated postmortem or stem cell-related samples and supervised experiments. All other authors performed experiments and analyzed data. All authors reviewed the paper.

Correspondence to Nikolaos Mellios.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zimmerman, A.J., Hafez, A.K., Amoah, S.K. et al. A psychiatric disease-related circular RNA controls synaptic gene expression and cognition. Mol Psychiatry (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-020-0653-4

Download citation