Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

What matters and what is possible in neuroimaging meta-analyses (of psychopathy)

This is a preview of subscription content

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    Latzman RD, Patrick CJ, Lilienfeld SO. Heterogeneity matters: implications for Poeppl et al.’s (2019) meta-analysis and future neuroimaging research on psychopathy. Mol Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-019-0386-4.

  2. 2.

    Poeppl TB, Donges MR, Mokros A, Rupprecht R, Fox PT, Laird AR et al. A view behind the mask of sanity: meta-analysis of aberrant brain activity in psychopaths. Mol Psychiatry. 2019;24:463–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Eickhoff SB, Nichols TE, Laird AR, Hoffstaedter F, Amunts K, Fox PT et al. Behavior, sensitivity, and power of activation likelihood estimation characterized by massive empirical simulation. Neuroimage. 2016;137:70–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Lilienfeld SO, Andrews BP. Development and preliminary validation of a self-report measure of psychopathic personality traits in noncriminal populations. J Personal Assess. 1996;66:488–524.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Patrick CJ, Hicks BM, Nichol PE, Krueger RF. A bifactor approach to modeling the structure of the psychopathy checklist-revised. J Personal Disord. 2007;21:118–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Olderbak S, Mokros A, Nitschke J, Habermeyer E, Wilhelm O. Psychopathic men: deficits in general mental ability, not emotion perception. J Abnorm Psychol. 2018;127:294–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Guay JP, Ruscio J, Kninght RA, Hare RD. A taxometric analysis of the latent structure of psychopathy: evidence for dimensionality. J Abnorm Psychol. 2007;116:701–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Müller VI, Cieslik EC, Serbanescu I, Laird AR, Fox PT, Eickhoff SB. Altered brain activity in unipolar depression revisited: meta-analyses of neuroimaging studies. JAMA Psychiatry. 2017;74:47–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Bzdok D, Meyer-Lindenberg A. Machine learning for precision psychiatry: opportunities and challenges. Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2018;3:223–30.

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Timm B. Poeppl.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Poeppl, T.B., Mokros, A., Bzdok, D. et al. What matters and what is possible in neuroimaging meta-analyses (of psychopathy). Mol Psychiatry 25, 3125–3126 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-019-0515-0

Download citation

Search

Quick links