Abstract

The emergence of prodromal symptoms of schizophrenia and their evolution into overt psychosis may stem from an aberrant functional reorganization of the brain during adolescence. To examine whether abnormalities in connectome organization precede psychosis onset, we performed a functional connectome analysis in a large cohort of medication-naive youth at risk for psychosis from the Shanghai At Risk for Psychosis (SHARP) study. The SHARP program is a longitudinal study of adolescents and young adults at Clinical High Risk (CHR) for psychosis, conducted at the Shanghai Mental Health Center in collaboration with neuroimaging laboratories at Harvard and MIT. Our study involved a total of 251 subjects, including 158 CHRs and 93 age-, sex-, and education-matched healthy controls. During 1-year follow-up, 23 CHRs developed psychosis. CHRs who would go on to develop psychosis were found to show abnormal modular connectome organization at baseline, while CHR non-converters did not. In all CHRs, abnormal modular connectome organization at baseline was associated with a threefold conversion rate. A region-specific analysis showed that brain regions implicated in early-course schizophrenia, including superior temporal gyrus and anterior cingulate cortex, were most abnormal in terms of modular assignment. Our results show that functional changes in brain network organization precede the onset of psychosis and may drive psychosis development in at-risk youth.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Additional information

Deceased authors: Larry J. Seidman, Robert W. McCarley

References

  1. 1.

    Liu CH, Keshavan MS, Tronick E, Seidman LJ. Perinatal risks and childhood premorbid indicators of later psychosis: next steps for early psychosocial interventions. Schizophr Bull. 2015;41:801–16.

  2. 2.

    Keshavan MS, Delisi LE, Seidman LJ. Early and broadly defined psychosis risk mental states. Schizophr Res. 2011;126:1–10.

  3. 3.

    Fusar-poli P, Bonoldi I, Yung AR, Borgwardt S, Kempton MJ, Valmaggia L, et al. Predicting psychosis: meta-analysis of transition outcomes in individuals at high clinical risk. JAMA Psychiatry. 2012;69:220–9.

  4. 4.

    Yung AR, McGorry PD. The prodromal phase of first-episode psychosis: past and current conceptualizations. Schizophr Bull. 1996;22:353–70.

  5. 5.

    Tandon R, Nasrallah HA, Keshavan MS. Schizophrenia, ‘just the facts’ 4. Clinical features and conceptualization. Schizophr Res. 2009;110:1–23.

  6. 6.

    Insel TR. Rethinking schizophrenia. Nature. 2010;468:187–93.

  7. 7.

    Simon AE, Borgwardt S, Riecher-Rössler A, Velthorst E, de Haan L, Fusar-Poli P. Moving beyond transition outcomes: meta-analysis of remission rates in individuals at high clinical risk for psychosis. Psychiatry Res. 2013;209:266–72.

  8. 8.

    Schlosser DA, Jacobson S, Chen Q, Sugar CA, Niendam TA, Li G, et al. Recovery from an at-risk state: clinical and functional outcomes of putatively prodromal youth who do not develop psychosis. Schizophr Bull. 2012;38:1225–33.

  9. 9.

    Wang C, Lee J, Ho NF, Lim JKW, Poh JS, Rekhi G, et al. Large-scale network topology reveals heterogeneity in individuals with at risk mental state for psychosis: findings from the Longitudinal Youth-at-Risk Study. Cereb Cortex. 2017;1–10. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhx278

  10. 10.

    Anticevic A, Haut K, Murray JD, Repovs G, Yang GJ, Diehl C, et al. Association of thalamic dysconnectivity and conversion to psychosis in youth and young adults at elevated clinical risk. JAMA Psychiatry. 2015;72:882–91.

  11. 11.

    Gu S, Satterthwaite TD, Medaglia JD, Yang M, Gur RE, Gur RC, et al. Emergence of system roles in normative neurodevelopment. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2015;112:13681–6.

  12. 12.

    Meunier D, Lambiotte R, Bullmore ET. Modular and hierarchically modular organization of brain networks. Front Neurosci. 2010;4:200.

  13. 13.

    Sporns O, Betzel RF. Modular brain networks. Annu Rev Psychol. 2016;67:613–40.

  14. 14.

    Fair DA, Cohen AL, Power JD, Dosenbach NUF, Church JA, Miezin FM, et al. Functional brain networks develop from a ‘local to distributed’ organization. PLoS Comput Biol. 2009;5:e1000381.

  15. 15.

    Satterthwaite TD, Wolf DH, Ruparel K, Erus G, Elliott MA, Eickhoff SB, et al. Heterogeneous impact of motion on fundamental patterns of developmental changes in functional connectivity during youth. Neuroimage. 2013;83:45–57.

  16. 16.

    Collin G, Keshavan MS. Connectome development and a novel extension to the neurodevelopmental model of schizophrenia. Dialog Clin Neurosci. 2018;20:101–10.

  17. 17.

    Sporns O. Contributions and challenges for network models in cognitive neuroscience. Nat Neurosci. 2014;17:652–60.

  18. 18.

    Zhang T, Li H, Tang Y, Niznikiewicz MA, Shenton ME, Keshavan MS, et al. Validating the predictive accuracy of the NAPLS-2 psychosis risk calculator in a clinical high-risk sample from the SHARP (Shanghai At Risk for Psychosis) Program. Am J Psychiatry. 2018;175:906–8.

  19. 19.

    Zheng L, Wang J, Zhang T, Li H, Li C, Jiang K. The Chinese version of the SIPS/SOPS: a pilot study of reliability and validity. Chin Ment Health J. 2012;26:571–6.

  20. 20.

    Miller TJ, McGlashan TH, Rosen JL, Cadenhead K, Ventura J, Mcfarlane W, et al. Prodromal assessment with the structured interview for prodromal syndromes and the scale of prodromal symptoms: predictive validity, interrater reliability, and training to reliability. Schizophr Bull. 2003;29:703–15.

  21. 21.

    Wechsler D. WASI manual. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation, Harcourt Brace; 1999.

  22. 22.

    McGlashan T, Walsh B, Woods S. The psychosis-risk syndrome: handbook for diagnosis and follow-up. New York: Oxford University Press; 2010.

  23. 23.

    Fornito A, Zalesky A, Breakspear M. Graph analysis of the human connectome: promise, progress, and pitfalls. Neuroimage. 2013;80:426–44.

  24. 24.

    Sohn WS, Yoo K, Lee YB, Seo SW, Na DL, Jeong Y. Influence of ROI selection on resting functional connectivity: an individualized approach for resting fMRI analysis. Front Neurosci. 2015;9:1–10.

  25. 25.

    Fischl B. FreeSurfer. Neuroimage. 2012;62:774–81.

  26. 26.

    Whitfield-Gabrieli S, Nieto-Castanon A. Conn: a functional connectivity toolbox for correlated and anticorrelated brain networks. Brain. 2012;2:125–41.

  27. 27.

    Makris N, Meyer JW, Bates JF, Yeterian EH, Kennedy DN, Caviness VS. MRI-based topographic parcellation of human cerebral white matter and nuclei. Neuroimage. 1999;9:18–45.

  28. 28.

    Blondel VD, Guillaume J-L, Lambiotte R, Lefebvre E. Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. J Stat Mech. 2008;P10008. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-5468/2008/10/P10008

  29. 29.

    Rubinov M, Sporns O. Weight-conserving characterization of complex functional brain networks. Neuroimage. 2011;56:2068–79.

  30. 30.

    Good BH, de Montjoye YA, Clauset A. Performance of modularity maximization in practical contexts. Phys Rev E. 2010;81:46106.

  31. 31.

    Doron KW, Bassett DS, Gazzaniga MS. Dynamic network structure of interhemispheric coordination. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2012;109:18661–8.

  32. 32.

    Traud AL, Kelsic ED, Mucha PJ, Porter MA. Comparing community structure to characteristics in online collegiate social networks. SIAM Rev. 2008;53:526–43.

  33. 33.

    Bordier C, Nicolini C, Forcellini G, Bifone A. Disrupted modular organization of primary sensory brain areas in schizophrenia. Neuroimage Clin. 2018;18:682–93.

  34. 34.

    Lerman-Sinkoff DB, Barch DM. Network community structure alterations in adult schizophrenia: identification and localization of alterations. Neuroimage Clin. 2016;10:96–106.

  35. 35.

    Hoffman R, Dobschka S. Cortical pruning and the development of schizophrenia: a computer model. Schizophr Bull. 1989;15:477–90.

  36. 36.

    Hoffman R, McGlashan T. Parallel distributed processing and the emergence of schizophrenic symptoms. Schizophr Bull. 1993;19:119–40.

  37. 37.

    Hoffman RE, McGlashan TH. Synaptic elimination, neurodevelopment, and the mechanism of hallucinated ‘voices’ in schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry. 1997;154:1683–9.

  38. 38.

    David AS. Dysmodularity: a neurocognitive model for schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull. 1994;20:249–55.

  39. 39.

    Yu Q, Plis SM, Erhardt EB, Allen EA, Sui J, Kiehl KA, et al. Modular organization of functional network connectivity in healthy controls and patients with schizophrenia during the resting state. Front Syst Neurosci. 2012;5:1–16.

  40. 40.

    Van den Heuvel MP, Sporns O, Collin G, Scheewe T, Mandl RCW, Cahn W, et al. Abnormal rich club organization and functional brain dynamics in schizophrenia. JAMA Psychiatry. 2013;70:783–92.

  41. 41.

    Schmidt A, Crossley NA, Harrisberger F, Smieskova R, Lenz C, Riecher-Rössler A, et al. Structural network disorganization in subjects at clinical high risk for psychosis. Schizophr Bull. 2017;43:583–91.

  42. 42.

    Alexander-Bloch AF, Gogtay N, Meunier D, Birn R, Clasen L, Lalonde F, et al. Disrupted modularity and local connectivity of brain functional networks in childhood-onset schizophrenia. Front Syst Neurosci. 2010;4:147.

  43. 43.

    Supekar K, Musen M, Menon V. Development of large-scale functional brain networks in children. PLoS Biol. 2009;7:e1000157.

  44. 44.

    Casey B, Jones R, Somerville L. Braking and accelerating of the adolescent brain. J Res Adolesc. 2011;21:21–33.

  45. 45.

    Skudlarski P, Jagannathan K, Anderson K, Stevens MC, Calhoun VD, Skudlarska BA, et al. Brain connectivity is not only lower but different in schizophrenia: a combined anatomical and functional approach. Biol Psychiatry. 2010;68:61–9.

  46. 46.

    Pettersson-Yeo W, Allen P, Benetti S, McGuire P, Mechelli A. Dysconnectivity in schizophrenia: where are we now? Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2011;35:1110–24.

  47. 47.

    Zalesky A, Cocchi L, Fornito A, Murray MM, Bullmore E. Connectivity differences in brain networks. Neuroimage. 2012;60:1055–62.

  48. 48.

    Honea R, Sc B, Crow TJ, Ph D, Passingham D, Ph D, et al. Regional deficits in brain volume in schizophrenia: a meta-analysis of voxel-based morphometry studies. Am J Psychiatry. 2005;162:2233–45.

  49. 49.

    Glahn DC, Laird AR, Ellison-Wright I, Thelen SM, Robinson JL, Lancaster JL, et al. Meta-analysis of gray matter anomalies in schizophrenia: application of anatomic likelihood estimation and network analysis. Biol Psychiatry. 2008;64:774–81.

  50. 50.

    Vita A, De Peri L, Deste G, Sacchetti E. Progressive loss of cortical gray matter in schizophrenia: A meta-analysis and meta-regression of longitudinal MRI studies. Transl Psychiatry. 2012;2:e190–13.

  51. 51.

    Shenton ME, Dickey CC, Frumin M, Mccarley RW. A review of MRI findings in schizophrenia. Schizophr Res. 2001;49:1–52.

  52. 52.

    Jung WH, Borgwardt S, Fusar-Poli P, Kwon JS. Gray matter volumetric abnormalities associated with the onset of psychosis. Front Psychiatry. 2012;3:1–21.

  53. 53.

    Tracy DK, Shergill SS. Mechanisms underlying auditory hallucinations—understanding perception without stimulus. Brain Sci. 2013;3:642–69.

  54. 54.

    Satterthwaite TD, Wolf DH, Loughead J, Ruparel K, Elliott MA, Hakonarson H, et al. Impact of in-scanner head motion on multiple measures of functional connectivity: relevance for studies of neurodevelopment in youth. Neuroimage. 2012;60:623–32.

  55. 55.

    Power JD, Barnes KA, Snyder AZ, Schlaggar BL, Petersen SE. Spurious but systematic correlations in functional connectivity MRI networks arise from subject motion. Neuroimage. 2012;59:2142–54.

  56. 56.

    Behzadi Y, Restom K, Liau J, Liu TT. A component based noise correction method (CompCor) for BOLD and perfusion based fMRI. Neuroimage. 2007;37:90–101.

  57. 57.

    Murphy K, Birn RM, Handwerker DA, Jones TB, Bandettini PA. The impact of global signal regression on resting state correlations: are anti-correlated networks introduced? Neuroimage. 2009;44:893–905.

  58. 58.

    Chai XJ, Castañán AN, Öngür D, Whitfield-Gabrieli S. Anticorrelations in resting state networks without global signal regression. Neuroimage. 2012;59:1420–8.

  59. 59.

    Murphy K, Birn RM, Bandettini PA. Resting-state FMRI confounds and cleanup. Neuroimage. 2013;80:349–59.

  60. 60.

    Rangaprakash D, Wu GR, Marinazzo D, Hu X, Deshpande G. Hemodynamic response function (HRF) variability confounds resting-state fMRI functional connectivity. Magn Reson Med. 2018;80:1697–713.

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology of China (2016 YFC 1306803) and US National Institute of Mental Health (R21 MH 093294, R01 MH 101052, and R01 MH 111448). GC was supported by an EU Marie Curie Global Fellowship (Grant no. 749201); MSK was supported by an NIMH Grant (R01 MH 64023); MES and RWM were supported by a VA Merit Award.

Author contributions

LJS passed away on 7 September 2017 and RWM passed away on 27 May 2017. LJS and RWM were two of the initiators and principal investigators of the Shanghai At Risk for Psychosis (SHARP) study.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychiatry, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA

    • Guusje Collin
    • , Larry J. Seidman
    • , Matcheri S. Keshavan
    • , William S. Stone
    •  & Zhenghan Qi
  2. McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA

    • Guusje Collin
    • , Sheeba Arnold Anteraper
    •  & Susan Whitfield-Gabrieli
  3. Psychiatry Neuroimaging Laboratory, Department of Psychiatry, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA

    • Guusje Collin
    •  & Martha E. Shenton
  4. Department of Linguistics and Cognitive Science, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA

    • Zhenghan Qi
  5. Shanghai Key Laboratory of Psychotic Disorders, Shanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China

    • Tianhong Zhang
    • , Yingying Tang
    •  & Jijun Wang
  6. Department of Psychology, Florida A&M University, Tallahassee, FL, USA

    • Huijun Li
  7. Alan and Lorraine Bressler Clinical and Research Program for Autism Spectrum Disorder, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA

    • Sheeba Arnold Anteraper
  8. Department of Psychiatry, VA Boston Healthcare System, Brockton Division, Brockton, MA, USA

    • Margaret A. Niznikiewicz
    •  & Robert W. McCarley
  9. Research and Development, VA Boston Healthcare System, Brockton Division, Brockton, MA, USA

    • Martha E. Shenton
  10. Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA

    • Martha E. Shenton
  11. Poitras Center for Affective Disorders, Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA

    • Susan Whitfield-Gabrieli

Authors

  1. Search for Guusje Collin in:

  2. Search for Larry J. Seidman in:

  3. Search for Matcheri S. Keshavan in:

  4. Search for William S. Stone in:

  5. Search for Zhenghan Qi in:

  6. Search for Tianhong Zhang in:

  7. Search for Yingying Tang in:

  8. Search for Huijun Li in:

  9. Search for Sheeba Arnold Anteraper in:

  10. Search for Margaret A. Niznikiewicz in:

  11. Search for Robert W. McCarley in:

  12. Search for Martha E. Shenton in:

  13. Search for Jijun Wang in:

  14. Search for Susan Whitfield-Gabrieli in:

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Guusje Collin or Jijun Wang.

Electronic supplementary material

About this article

Publication history

Received

Revised

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-018-0288-x