Abstract
Melanomas that have histopathologic features that overlap with those of Spitz nevus are referred to as spitzoid melanomas. However, the diagnostic concept is used inconsistently and genomic analyses suggest it is a heterogeneous category. Spitz tumors, the spectrum of melanocytic neoplasms extending from Spitz nevi to their malignant counterpart Spitz melanoma, are defined in the 2018 WHO classification of skin tumors by the presence of specific genetic alterations, such as kinase fusions or HRAS mutations. It is unclear what fraction of “spitzoid melanomas” defined solely by their histopathologic features belong to the category of Spitz melanoma or to other melanoma subtypes. We assembled a cohort of 25 spitzoid melanomas diagnosed at a single institution over an 8-year period and performed high-coverage DNA sequencing of 480 cancer related genes. Transcriptome wide RNA sequencing was performed for select cases. Only nine cases (36%) had genetic alterations characteristic of Spitz melanoma, including HRAS mutation or fusion involving BRAF, ALK, NTRK1, or MAP3K8. The remaining cases were divided into those with an MAPK activating mutation and those without an MAPK activating mutation. Both Spitz melanoma and spitzoid melanomas in which an MAPK-activating mutation could not be identified tended to occur in younger patients on skin with little solar elastosis, infrequently harbored TERT promoter mutations, and had a lower burden of pathogenic mutations than spitzoid melanomas with non-Spitz MAPK-activating mutations. The MAPK-activating mutations identified affected non-V600 residues of BRAF as well as NRAS, MAP2K1/2, NF1, and KIT, while BRAF V600 mutations, the most common mutations in melanomas of the WHO low-CSD category, were entirely absent. While the “spitzoid melanomas” comprising our cohort were enriched for bona fide Spitz melanomas, the majority of melanomas fell outside of the genetically defined category of Spitz melanomas, indicating that histomorphology is an unreliable predictor of Spitz lineage.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Spitz nevi are composed of epithelioid to spindled melanocytes with abundant homogenous cytoplasm and large vesicular nuclei, and often display epidermal hyperplasia, clefts around and between melanocytes, Kamino bodies, and maturation with descent. They can have limited scatter of melanocytes into the upper levels of the epidermis [1]. They were first described by Sophie Spitz in 1948 as melanomas of childhood [2]. Clinically, they are most commonly encountered as rapidly growing lesions in children but can occur at any age [1, 3]. Spitz tumor refers to the spectrum of melanocytic tumors with histopathologic features of Spitz nevus that ranges from benign to malignant. They may be challenging to classify as benign or malignant because histopathologic features that are commonly taken as indicators of malignancy, such as nuclear atypia, scatter of melanocytes in the upper epidermis, poor maturation within the dermis, deep extension, and deep dermal mitoses, are not uncommonly seen in Spitz tumors with benign biologic behavior [4].
Recently, a broad spectrum of MAPK activating alterations has been identified in Spitz nevi that differ from those in other types of melanocytic nevi. These include activating point mutations in HRAS (often with copy number gain of mutant HRAS) and rearrangements involving the serine/threonine kinases BRAF and MAP3K8 or the receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) ROS1, ALK, NTRK1, NTRK3, RET, MET, and MERTK [5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13] and occur in a mutually exclusive fashion with only one mutation in a given Spitz nevus. Despite comprehensive genetic profiling of many Spitz nevi for other oncogenes and tumor suppressors, additional concomitant oncogenic drivers have not been identified, suggesting that these mutations alone are capable of initiating the clonal expansion that results in a Spitz nevus. Early studies indicated that the histomorphologic features of Spitz nevi correspond with their initiating mutations to some degree [14,15,16]. Thus, the diverse spectrum of initiating mutations in Spitz tumors and the resulting variation in the clinical phenotype likely contributes to the diagnostic difficulty of Spitz tumors. In contrast, the initiating mutations in common acquired nevi are much more homogeneous with over 80% harboring BRAF V600E mutations [17, 18]. While there have been a number of iterations of criteria to distinguish Spitz nevi from melanoma [19], even their authors acknowledge their limitations.
The term “spitzoid melanoma” refers to histopathologically malignant tumors comprised of large epithelioid melanocytes resembling those found in Spitz nevi. Spitzoid melanoma is thus a purely morphology-based diagnosis, and prior studies have shown that many tumors classified as such have genetic hallmarks of melanomas of skin with low-cumulative sun-induced damage (low-CSD melanomas), such as BRAF and NRAS mutations, and a high mutation burden with a UV signature. As Spitz nevi do not show activating BRAF or NRAS point mutations, spitzoid melanomas with these mutations are not genetically related to Spitz nevi. In one study, fusions involving BRAF or RTKs were identified in 41% of Spitz nevi, but only 13% of spitzoid melanomas [7]. In another study of six pediatric spitzoid melanomas, kinase fusions typical of Spitz nevi were identified in five cases [20]. Activating BRAF or NRAS mutations, which are typical of other melanomas were identified in 20–86% of spitzoid melanomas across various studies [21,22,23,24]. De Forno et al. did not identify HRAS mutation, found in a subset of Spitz tumors, in a cohort of 21 spitzoid melanomas and on this basis argued that spitzoid melanomas are not related to HRAS-mutated Spitz nevi [23]. Lazova et al. performed exome sequencing of 27 spitzoid melanomas and BRAF V600 mutations were found in 37% and NRAS mutations in 15% of cases. Only one case (4%) had an HRAS mutation indicative of a Spitz lineage [24]. Gene fusions are not detectable by exome sequencing and thus could not be analyzed in this study. The majority of cases in this series also had a mutation burden comparable with low- and high-CSD melanomas.
Based on the observation that a considerable portion of spitzoid melanomas have the genetic hallmarks of other types of cutaneous melanomas, the 2018 WHO classification of skin tumors introduced the concept of Spitz melanoma (malignant Spitz tumor) as a melanoma subtype that not only has the morphologic features of Spitz tumors, but also has their genetic hallmarks, namely the distinct spectrum of MAPK activating alterations described above [25]. This is likely an important distinction, as clinical evidence suggests that tumors at the malignant end of the spectrum of Spitz tumors have a better prognosis than other types of cutaneous melanomas. This applies particularly to children, in whom spitzoid tumors with malignant histopathologic features less commonly metastasize with lethal outcome as compared with conventional melanomas [26]. Therefore, we have designated spitzoid melanomas in children as “spitzoid melanoma, childhood type” in our practice and provide a comment that although they have histopathologic features of malignancy, their risk for recurrence and death appears lower than for conventional (or “adult-type”) cutaneous melanoma.
Here, we investigate what fraction of spitzoid melanomas in our practice fall into the newly defined entity Spitz melanoma, and analyze their clinical, histomorphologic and genetic features.
Materials and methods
Case selection and histopathologic analysis
After approval from the institutional review board at the University of California, San Francisco, we searched our archives for melanomas diagnosed from 2010 to 2017 and annotated as having spitzoid features. Each case was rereviewed by three pathologists (SP, SR, and IY) and only cases that were determined to have spitzoid cytomorphologic features by consensus and had archival tissue available for molecular analysis were included. Pathologic features such epidermal effacement and hyperplasia, ulceration, Kamino body formation, dermal mitoses, and cytology/pleomorphism were recorded for each case. Pigmentation was graded on a 0–4 scale as previously described [27]. Similarly, the extent of solar elastosis was graded on a previously developed scale [28]. Clinical follow-up data were obtained from a combination of chart review and patient outreach.
DNA and RNA extraction
Hematoxylin and eosin stained sections were used to guide tumor microdissection from formalin-fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) sections of 10 µm in thickness. DNA and RNA extraction were performed using the QIAGEN Allprep DNA/RNA FFPE extraction kit (QIAGEN, Germantown, MD, p/n 80204).
DNA sequencing and analysis
A total of 50–250 ng of DNA was prepared for sequencing using the KAPA Hyper Prep Kit (KAPA Biosciences, Wilmington, MA p/n KK8504) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Custom-designed bait libraries were used to target the coding regions of 480 genes (Supplementary Table 1). Select introns of kinases rearranged in melanocytic tumors (ALK, BRAF, MET, NTRK1, NTRK3, RET, ROS1, PRKCA) and the promoter region of TERT were also targeted. Sequencing was performed as paired-end 100 bp reads on a HiSeq2500 (Illumina).
Sequence reads were mapped to the human genome (hg19) using the Burrows–Wheeler aligner [29]. Recalibration of reads and variant calling were performed using the Genome Analysis Toolkit [30] and FreeBayes [31]. Quality metrics were determined using Picard [32] (Supplementary Table 2). Three samples with coverage below 25× tumor-specific coverage were excluded from the study. Variant annotation was performed with Annovar [33]. Structural variant detection was performed with Delly [34] and reviewed by visual inspection in the Integrative Genomics Viewer [35]. Resulting fusion transcripts were predicted by joining the exons upstream and downstream from the genomic breakpoint. Genomic copy number assessment was performed with CNVkit [36] which uses off-target reads with adjustment of copy ratios for tumor fraction as estimated by THetA [37].
We reviewed all alterations annotated as pathogenic or likely pathogenic in ClinVar [38]. We excluded variants with >1% prevalence in the NHLBI GO Exome Sequencing Project [39] or 1000 Genomes Project [40] from further review as they likely represent benign germline polymorphisms. We classified truncating mutations in known tumor suppressors as pathogenic. For genes in which a cancer related pathogenic alteration was identified, we manually annotated all remaining variants of that gene as pathogenic, likely pathogenic, uncertain significance, and likely benign by literature review, using various databases as annotation resources (OMIM [41], MyCancerGenome [42]). We determined the number of pathogenic copy number alterations in each case. Shallow deletions of a tumor suppressor accompanied by pathogenic alteration of that tumor suppressor was considered a pathogenic copy number alteration. Deep deletions of tumor suppressors were counted as two pathogenic alterations. Copy number increase of an oncogene was counted as one pathogenic alteration, whereas amplification was counted as two pathogenic alterations. We also counted copy loss of chromosome 9p without mutation in the remaining allele of CDKN2A as a pathogenic alteration, given the importance of this tumor suppressor in melanoma and reports of gene silencing by promoter hypermethylation.
RNA sequencing and analysis
For the nine cases in which a pathogenic MAPK activating alteration was not identified by DNA sequencing, whole transcriptome RNA sequencing was performed. A total of 170–400 ng of total RNA was prepared for sequencing using the KAPA stranded RNA-seq kit (KAPA Biosciences, Wilmington, MA, p/n KK8400) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Subsequently, exome capture was carried out using NimbleGen SeqCap EZ MedExome target enrichment probes (Roche, Basel, Switzerland, p/n 07681330001) following the manufacturer’s protocol. Sequencing was performed on a NovaSeq 6000 system (Illumina Inc, San Diego, CA) with 150-bp paired-end reads. Sequence reads were mapped to the reference human genome (hg19) using STAR [43] and fusions were identified by FusionCatcher [44] and verified by manual review.
Statistical analyses
A genetic dataset for cutaneous melanoma provided by the Cancer Genome Atlas (Skin Cutaneous melanoma, TCGA) [45] was downloaded from cBioPortal [46, 47], providing mutational data for 448 cases of cutaneous melanomas. Previous studies have identified kinase fusions in the TCGA [48, 49]. The prevalence of mutations in the TCGA dataset was compared with that of our cohort by Fisher’s exact test.
Pearson correlation was calculated between age, number of pathogenic mutations, and extent of solar elastosis (converting the scale from Landi et al. which ranges from 0 to 3+ to an numeric scale ranging from 1 to 11). The statistical significance of the differences between each group was calculated by two-sided t-test.
Results
A total of 25 patients with spitzoid melanoma were included in this study (see Table 1 for summary of clinical and histologic features). For 19 patients, we received biopsies in formalin, and for the remaining six patients we received slides sent in consultation. Their average age was 43.8 years (range 4–80 years), including six patients 16 years of age or younger. Males and females were evenly represented. The spitzoid melanomas most commonly involved the extremities (64%, 16/25) and less commonly the head and neck (20%, 5/25) or the trunk (16%, 4/25). The average Breslow thickness was 2.1 mm (range 0.4–8.4 mm) and the mean diameter was 5.9 mm (range 2.2–9.8 mm). It should be noted that some melanomas were transected at the base of the biopsy, so the Breslow thickness could be underestimated.
The majority of tumors (n = 23, 92%) were predominantly composed of large epithelioid melanocytes with abundant cytoplasm with a minority of spindled melanocytes. Two cases (8%) were composed exclusively of spindled melanocytes. Cytoplasmic melanin was identified in 19 cases (76%), with eight tumors (32%) demonstrating strong (grade 3–4) pigmentation. Epidermal hyperplasia was present in 80% of cases. Kamino bodies were uncommon, identified in only two (8%) cases.
Spitz melanomas
Two spitzoid melanomas contained HRAS hotspot mutations with gain of the mutant allele (8%). One occurred on the leg of a 50-year-old woman and there was also loss of chromosome 9 on which CDKN2A resides (case 14). In this case, p16 expression was absent by immunohistochemistry, suggesting inactivation of the remaining allele of CDKN2A. The other melanoma occurred on the arm of a 75 year-old-woman, and in addition to the HRAS mutation there was a three-codon deletion in MAP2K1 (p.102_104del), a known gain-of-function mutation [50, 51] with a copy number gain of the mutant allele, a hemizygous truncating mutation in ARID1A, an amplification of NOTCH2, and homozygous deletion of CDKN2A (case 23). Both HRAS-mutated Spitz melanomas were predominantly intradermal with a broad, horizontal silhouette and haphazardly arranged, thickened collagen bundles (Fig. 1), similar to HRAS-mutated Spitz nevi [5].
BRAF fusions were identified in two cases (8%). Case 12 occurred on the knee of a 47-year-old woman and had an NRF1-BRAF fusion, similar to those reported in pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma [52], a TERT promoter hotspot mutation [53, 54], and a hemizygous PTENG165R mutation [55] (Fig. 2). Case 4 (included in a previous study of BRAF fusions in melanocytic tumors [6]) harbored a SOX6-BRAF fusion with focal amplification of the fusion gene. While additional pathogenic point mutations were not identified, there were multiple copy number aberrations, including gains of distal chromosome 1p, chromosomes 2, 12, 13, and 15 as well as copy number neutral loss of heterozygosity of chromosome 3.
Rearrangements affected the RTKs ALK in two cases (8%) and NTRK1 in one case (4%). Case 7 occurred on the thigh of a 23-year-old-female and contained a DCTN1-ALK fusion with loss of chromosome 9 and increased dermal mitoses (3/mm2) (Fig. 3). Case 10 occurred on the leg of a 34-year-old man and harbored a fusion of the 3′ portion of ALK to an intergenic region of chromosome 11q, with a gain of the distal portion of ALK encoding the kinase domain, suggesting that a complex rearrangement resulted in an ALK kinase fusion as the oncogene in this case. The tumors with ALK rearrangements demonstrated fascicular nests of melanocytes as characteristic of Spitz nevi with ALK fusions [14, 15]. A TPM3-NTRK1 fusion was present in one case along with gain of chromosome 17 and loss of chromosome 5p upstream of TERT suggestive of a genomic rearrangement which altered TERT promoter or enhancer sequences, a mechanism of telomerase reactivation previously described in neuroblastoma [56]. This tumor contained rosette-like structures within the dermal component (Fig. 4), a feature that is more common in Spitz nevi with NTRK1 fusion [16].
Rearrangements of MAP3K8 were identified in 2 cases by RNA sequencing (8%). Case 2 demonstrated a ZFP36L1-MAP3K8 fusion and occurred on the right arm of an 11-year-old girl and was notable for pigment rich epithelioid and spindled cells with some adnexal extension. Case 11 contained an MAP3K8-SVIL fusion and presented on the right thigh of a 55-year-old man and contained severely pleomorphic epithelioid cells with mild epidermal hyperplasia. Both cases also demonstrated bi-allelic loss of CDKN2A without other pathogenic alterations.
While HRAS mutations and BRAF or RTK fusions were identified in TCGA skin cutaneous melanoma (SKCM) cohort [45, 48], these alterations occurred at greater prevalence in our cohort (P = 0.0479 for HRAS mutation, P = 0.00041 for fusions of BRAF, NTRK1, or ALK). The difference in prevalence of MAP3K8 fusion was not statistically significant (P = 0.0942).
Mutations activating the MAP-kinase pathway were present in half of spitzoid melanomas without Spitz nevus associated mutations
Altogether, nine (36%) of the spitzoid melanomas were classified as Spitz melanoma due to the presence of an oncogenic alterations typical of Spitz tumors. Other MAP-kinase pathway activating alterations not associated with Spitz nevi were identified in another nine (36%) spitzoid melanomas. Interestingly, we did not identify any BRAFV600 mutations in our cohort. BRAFV600E is common in melanomas without chronic sun-induced damage (non-CSD) and was significantly underrepresented in our spitzoid melanomas as compared with the TCGA SKCM cohort (P = 1.3 × 10−6). This underrepresentation was not due to excluding cases that were positive by BRAF V600E immunohistochemistry. We identified a BRAF D594G mutation in a single case (case 19), which is a class 3 BRAF mutation that is considered weakly activating [57]. This tumor had a concomitant activating MAP2K2F57Y mutation [58,59,60]. MAP2K2, also known as MEK2, acts directly downstream of BRAF in the MAPK pathway, and the MAP2K2 mutation likely cooperates with the class 3 BRAF mutation. This tumor also had a hotspot mutation in the promoter of TERT and an activating EZH2Y646N mutation [61]. Histopathologically, this tumor contained large epithelioid cells with a high mitotic index and severe nuclear pleomorphism (Fig. 5).
NRAS hotspot mutations were identified in five of cases (20%), at a similar prevalence as in the SKCM cohort of TCGA. It included a melanoma on the helix of the ear of a 16-year-old boy (case 6, Fig. 6) with an NRASQ61H mutation that underwent secondary amplification as the sole detected pathogenic mutation. In case 25, the NRASQ61H mutation occurred in combination with an activating CTNNB1G34I mutation, a TERT promoter mutation, and IDH1R132C and NFKBIEG41E mutations [62,63,64]. This spitzoid melanoma also demonstrated a minor small cell component, which did not demonstrate the strong and uniform beta-catenin staining indicative of CTNNB1 mutation observed in the majority of the melanoma. This finding suggests that the CTNNB1 mutation arose later in melanoma progression resulting in the epithelioid cytomorphology present in the majority of the melanoma (Supplementary Fig. 1).
Bi-allelic loss of NF1 occurred in two (8%) cases, in combination with NRASG12D in one case (case 17). Activating KITL576P and MAP2K1E203K mutations were identified in the absence of additional MAPK pathway activating mutations in one case each [65, 66].
In the remaining seven (28%) of cases, no mutations in MAP-kinase pathway were identified. This included an unpigmented epithelioid cell tumor with a CRTC1-TRIM11 fusion, typical for a new class of tumors that bear resemblance to clear cell sarcoma [67], on the cheek of a 13-year-old girl (case 5, Supplementary Fig. 2).
Subclasses of spitzoid melanoma
A summary of the pathogenic mutations identified in our series is presented in Fig. 7a. We identified three genetic subcategories in our series: (1) Spitz melanoma, (2) spitzoid melanoma without identified MAPK activating mutations, and (3) spitzoid melanoma non-Spitz MAPK activating mutations. The latter tended to occur in older patients and arose in skin with higher degrees of solar elastosis and had more pathogenic alterations (Fig. 7b and Supplementary Fig. 3).
Mutations in the promoter of TERT are present in ~70% of cutaneous melanomas and are associated with worse prognosis in both conventional and spitzoid melanoma [68, 69]. Hotspot TERT promoter alterations were identified in eight spitzoid melanomas (32%) and were more common in spitzoid melanomas with a non-Spitz nevus MAPK activating mutation (Fig. 7c).
Inactivation of the tumor suppressor CDKN2A is a major driver in melanoma, and homozygous deletion of CDKN2A may be associated with poor outcome in atypical Spitz tumors [68, 70]. Bi-allelic loss of function of CDKN2A was identified in five (20%) spitzoid melanomas. In four cases, bi-allelic loss occurred by homozygous deletion of CDKN2A, and in the remaining case, there was a truncating mutation of CDKN2A with loss of the wild-type allele. Four of nine (44%) Spitz melanomas demonstrated bi-allelic inactivation of CDKN2A.
Clinical follow-up
We were able to obtain clinical follow-up data for 12 patients, 11 of whom were alive at the time of this study (Table 1, mean follow-up 44 months). One patient died 60 months after excision from unknown causes. One patient (case 21) had multiple cutaneous recurrences beginning 26 months after excision. Another patient had a positive sentinel lymph node biopsy that was followed by completion lymphadenectomy with no record of relapse during follow-up. Nine patients were treated with simple excision all of which had an uneventful follow-up period.
Discussion
The genetic alterations in our series of 25 spitzoid melanomas differed significantly from those reported for cutaneous melanomas. BRAF V600 mutations found in the majority of low-CSD cutaneous melanomas were completely absent, indicating that spitzoid melanomas do not typically arise from common acquired nevi. Instead we found an increased incidence (30%) of oncogenic alterations typical for Spitz tumors such as HRAS mutation and activating fusions BRAF, MAP3K8, ALK, and NTRK1.
The Spitz melanomas with HRAS mutation or ALK or NTRK1 kinase fusion retained the some of the distinct histopathologic features associated with Spitz nevi with these mutations. Two of the Spitz melanomas had genetic features that indicate malignancy in low- and high-CSD melanoma (Cases 12 and 23). Two additional Spitz melanomas had bi-allelic inactivation of CDKN2A. Case 3 with an NTRK1 fusion, but without other definitely pathogenic mutations demonstrated copy number loss upstream of TERT, suggesting a structural rearrangement. Similar rearrangements reactivate TERT in neuroblastoma and have been reported in lethal Spitz melanoma in the absence of a TERT promoter mutation [13]. By design, our targeted assay cannot detect structural rearrangements far upstream of TERT and therefore we may have missed similar alterations in other cases.
Most of our spitzoid melanomas were not classifiable as Spitz melanomas based on their genetic alterations. We further subdivided these “non-Spitz” spitzoid melanomas into those without any identifiable MAP-kinase pathway mutations and those with MAPK pathway mutation(s) not associated with Spitz nevi such as in NRAS, BRAF, KIT, NF1, and/or MAP2K1/2.
The melanomas in the latter of these two groups occurred in older patients, with more solar elastosis in the adjacent dermis and had a higher number of pathogenic mutations than the rest of our spitzoid melanomas, suggesting that they have a higher somatic mutation burden due to UV exposure. One notable exception was a spitzoid melanoma with focused high-level amplification of mutant NRAS that occurred on the ear of a teenager and demonstrated minimal solar elastosis and no additional pathogenic alterations. Focused high-level amplification of mutant NRAS has been described in spitzoid tumors on the ear of children [71]. Perhaps secondary amplification of mutant NRAS leads to spitzoid cytomorphologic features by a mechanism similar to HRAS mutation.
The different histopathologic features of conventional and Spitz nevi likely reflect differences in the oncogenic signaling outputs of their initiating mutations. Melanocytes of a conventional nevus may acquire secondary genetic alterations that lead to additional proliferation and a change in the cytomorphology of the neoplastic melanocytes. For example, when a melanocyte of a conventional nevus, which was initiated by a BRAF (or rarely RAS) mutation, acquires an activating CTNNB1 mutation in addition to the mutation which initiated the nevus, a secondary clonal expansion of melanocytes characterized by increased cell size and pigmentation results in a component of deep penetrating nevus (melanocytoma) [51]. Bi-allelic loss of BAP1 in a melanocyte of a conventional nevus results in a secondary proliferation of epithelioid melanocytes with distinctive spitzoid cytomorphology [72,73,74,75]. Similarly, bi-allelic loss of PRKAR1A leads to development of a pigmented epithelioid melanocytoma within a conventional nevus [76]. While we identified a CTNNB1 mutation in one spitzoid melanoma, we did not identify any pathogenic BAP1 mutations in our series. This may indicate that cutaneous melanomas with BAP1 loss are rare and represent only a small fraction of spitzoid melanoma, or that the spitzoid cytomorphologic features of melanocytic tumors with BAP1 loss are not retained during malignant progression. Intriguingly, two spitzoid melanomas harbored activating EZH2 mutations. Loss of BAP1 has been shown to lead to increased EZH2 activity and EZH2-dependent transformation [77]. Perhaps mutational activation of EZH2 is functionally similar to loss of BAP1 and also results in a spitzoid phenotype.
Most spitzoid melanomas without identified MAP-kinase pathway mutations occurred in young patients with little solar elastosis, similar to Spitz melanomas. Their genomes did not contain many deletions and amplifications suggesting they are distinct from “triple wild-type” melanomas in the TCGA that characteristically contain many copy number aberrations and structural rearrangements [45]. In one case we identified a CRTC1-TRIM11 fusion which is not predicted to affect MAPK pathway signaling and has been recently described in dermal melanocytic tumors composed of epithelioid and spindled cells with minimal pigmentation that resemble clear cell sarcoma [67]. This case lacked melanin (pigmentation score of 0) and was characterized by epithelioid to spindled melanocytes with vesicular chromatin and a single prominent nucleolus, findings very characteristic of clear cell sarcoma. Future studies employing comprehensive DNA and RNA sequencing or interrogation of DNA methylation status may identify additional alterations that lead to spitzoid cytomorphology, particularly in cases without an identified MAP-kinase pathway mutation.
Interestingly, our findings differ from those of the study performed by Lazova et al., in which the authors found a high genetic similarity between spitzoid and conventional melanomas with ~40% of the spitzoid melanomas in their series having a BRAF V600 mutation [24]. Perhaps the younger age of patients in our study accounts in part for the differences as the average age in our study was 45 years, whereas the average age in the study by Lazova et al. was 64 years. More likely, the disparate results may reflect different histopathologic criteria for spitzoid melanoma across institutions.
While our study was limited by a lack of clinical follow-up and somatic mutation burden was not quantified as we did not sequence matched normal DNA, our findings suggest that multiple evolutionary pathways can lead to spitzoid melanoma, and that it is not a homogeneous category. Given the genomic diversity of Spitz melanoma, and indeed the likelihood that spitzoid melanomas without Spitz initiating oncogenes are also genomically diverse, the failure of histopathologic criteria to distinguish all Spitz nevi from all spitzoid melanomas is not surprising. Diagnostic criteria likely need to be developed for each molecular sublineage (i.e. ALK-fused Spitz tumors, HRAS mutant Spitz tumors) and may need to include molecular as well as histopathologic findings. Future studies will aim to determine differences in clinical behavior for Spitz melanoma as compared with low- or high-CSD melanoma and the impact of specific initiating mutation, additional pathogenic mutations, and mutation burden on clinical outcomes.
References
Barnhill RL. The Spitzoid lesion: rethinking Spitz tumors, atypical variants, “Spitzoid melanoma” and risk assessment. Mod Pathol. 2006;19 Suppl 2 :S21–33.
Spitz S. Melanomas of childhood. Am J Pathol. 1948;24:591–609.
Dika E, Fanti PA, Fiorentino M, Capizzi E, Neri I, Piraccini BM, et al. Spitzoid tumors in children and adults: a comparative clinical, pathological, and cytogenetic analysis. Melanoma Res. 2015;25:295–301.
Gerami P, Busam K, Cochran A, Cook MG, Duncan LM, Elder DE, et al. Histomorphologic assessment and interobserver diagnostic reproducibility of atypical spitzoid melanocytic neoplasms with long-term follow-up. Am J Surg Pathol. 2014;38:934–40.
Bastian BC, LeBoit PE, Pinkel D. Mutations and copy number increase of HRAS in Spitz nevi with distinctive histopathological features. Am J Pathol. 2000;157:967–72.
Botton T, Yeh I, Nelson T, Vemula SS, Sparatta A, Garrido MC, et al. Recurrent BRAF kinase fusions in melanocytic tumors offer an opportunity for targeted therapy. Pigment Cell Melanoma Res. 2013;26:845–51.
Wiesner T, He J, Yelensky R, Esteve-Puig R, Botton T, Yeh I, et al. Kinase fusions are frequent in Spitz tumours and spitzoid melanomas. Nat Commun. 2014;5:3116.
Yeh I, Botton T, Talevich E, Shain AH, Sparatta AJ, de la Fouchardiere A, et al. Activating MET kinase rearrangements in melanoma and Spitz tumours. Nat Commun. 2015;6:7174.
Yeh I, Tee MK, Botton T, Shain AH, Sparatta AJ, Gagnon A, et al. NTRK3 kinase fusions in Spitz tumours. J Pathol. 2016;240:282–90.
Wang L, Busam KJ, Benayed R, Cimera R, Wang J, Denley R, et al. Identification of NTRK3 fusions in childhood melanocytic neoplasms. J Mol Diagn. 2017;19:387–96.
VandenBoom T, Quan VL, Zhang B, Garfield EM, Kong BY, Isales MC, et al. Genomic fusions in pigmented spindle cell nevus of reed: Am J Surg Pathol. 2018;42:1042–51.
Quan VL, Zhang B, Mohan LS, Shi K, Isales MC, Panah E, et al. Activating structural alterations in MAPK genes are distinct genetic drivers in a unique subgroup of spitzoid neoplasms. Am J Surg Pathol. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1097/PAS.0000000000001213.
Newman S, Fan L, Pribnow A, Silkov A, Rice SV, Lee S, et al. Clinical genome sequencing uncovers potentially targetable truncations and fusions of MAP3K8 in spitzoid and other melanomas. Nat Med. 2019;25:597–602.
Busam KJ, Kutzner H, Cerroni L, Wiesner T. Clinical and pathologic findings of Spitz nevi and atypical Spitz tumors with ALK fusions. Am J Surg Pathol. 2014;38:925–33.
Yeh I, de la Fouchardiere A, Pissaloux D, Mully TW, Garrido MC, Vemula SS, et al. Clinical, histopathologic, and genomic features of Spitz tumors with ALK fusions. Am J Surg Pathol. 2015;39:581–91.
Amin SM, Haugh AM, Lee CY, Zhang B, Bubley JA, Merkel EA, et al. A comparison of morphologic and molecular features of BRAF, ALK, and NTRK1 fusion spitzoid neoplasms. Am J Surg Pathol. 2017;41:491–8.
Pollock PM, Harper UL, Hansen KS, Yudt LM, Stark M, Robbins CM, et al. High frequency of BRAF mutations in nevi. Nat Genet. 2003;33:19–20.
Yeh I, von Deimling A, Bastian BC. Clonal BRAF mutations in melanocytic nevi and initiating role of BRAF in melanocytic neoplasia. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2013;105:917–9.
Ackerman AB. Spitz’s nevus: reassessment critical, revision radical. New York: Ardor Scribendi, 2007.
Wu G, Barnhill RL, Lee S, Li Y, Shao Y, Easton J, et al. The landscape of fusion transcripts in spitzoid melanoma and biologically indeterminate spitzoid tumors by RNA sequencing. Mod Pathol. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1038/modpathol.2016.37.
van Dijk MCRF, Bernsen MR, Ruiter DJ. Analysis of mutations in B-RAF, N-RAS, and H-RAS genes in the differential diagnosis of Spitz nevus and spitzoid melanoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 2005;29:1145–51.
Fullen DR, Poynter JN, Lowe L, Su LD, Elder JT, Nair RP, et al. BRAF and NRAS mutations in spitzoid melanocytic lesions. Mod Pathol. 2006;19:1324–32.
Da Forno PD, Pringle JH, Fletcher A, Bamford M, Su L, Potter L, et al. BRAF, NRAS and HRAS mutations in spitzoid tumours and their possible pathogenetic significance. Br J Dermatol. 2009;161:364–72.
Lazova R, Pornputtapong N, Halaban R, Bosenberg M, Bai Y, Chai H, et al. Spitz nevi and Spitzoid melanomas: exome sequencing and comparison with conventional melanocytic nevi and melanomas. Mod Pathol. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1038/modpathol.2016.237.
Elder DE, Massi D, Scolyer R, Willemze R. WHO classification of skin tumours, 4th ed. Lyon, France: IARC Press; 2018.
Paradela S, Fonseca E, Pita-Fernández S, Prieto Vg. Spitzoid and non-spitzoid melanoma in children. A prognostic comparative study. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2013;27:1214–21.
Viros A, Fridlyand J, Bauer J, Lasithiotakis K, Garbe C, Pinkel D, et al. Improving melanoma classification by integrating genetic and morphologic features. PLoS Med. 2008;5:e120.
Landi MT, Bauer J, Pfeiffer RM, Elder DE, Hulley B, Minghetti P, et al. MC1R germline variants confer risk for BRAF-mutant melanoma. Science. 2006;313:521–2.
Li H, Durbin R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinforma Oxf Engl. 2009;25:1754–60.
McKenna A, Hanna M, Banks E, Sivachenko A, Cibulskis K, Kernytsky A, et al. The genome analysis toolkit: a MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. Genome Res. 2010;20:1297–303.
Garrison, Erik M Gabor. Haplotype-based variant detection from short-read sequencing. 2012. https://arxiv.org/abs/1207.3907.
Broad Institute. Picard. Broad Institute. http://broadinstitute.github.io/picard/.
Wang K, Li M, Hakonarson H. ANNOVAR: functional annotation of genetic variants from high-throughput sequencing data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010;38:e164–e164.
Rausch T, Zichner T, Schlattl A, Stütz AM, Benes V, Korbel JO. DELLY: structural variant discovery by integrated paired-end and split-read analysis. Bioinformatics. 2012;28:i333–i339.
Thorvaldsdóttir H, Robinson JT, Mesirov JP. Integrative genomics viewer (IGV): high-performance genomics data visualization and exploration. Brief Bioinform. 2013;14:178–92.
Talevich E, Shain AH, Botton T, Bastian BC. CNVkit: genome-wide copy number detection and visualization from targeted dna sequencing. PLOS Comput Biol. 2016;12:e1004873.
Oesper L, Satas G, Raphael BJ. Quantifying tumor heterogeneity in whole-genome and whole-exome sequencing data. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:3532–40.
Landrum MJ, Lee JM, Benson M, Brown G, Chao C, Chitipiralla S, et al. ClinVar: public archive of interpretations of clinically relevant variants. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44:D862–868.
NHLBI GO Exome Sequencing Project (ESP). Exome variant server. Seattle, WA. http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS/.
Consortium T 1000 GP. A global reference for human genetic variation. Nature. 2015;526:nature15393.
Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man, OMM. McKusick-Nathans Institute of Genetic Medicine, Johns Hopkins University (Baltimore, MD). https://omim.org.
My Cancer Genome. https://www.mycancergenome.org.
Dobin A, Davis CA, Schlesinger F, Drenkow J, Zaleski C, Jha S, et al. STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics. 2013;29:15–21.
Nicorici D, Şatalan M, Edgren H, Kangaspeska S, Murumägi A, Kallioniemi O, et al. FusionCatcher—a tool for finding somatic fusion genes in paired-end RNA-sequencing data. 2014. https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/011650v1.
Akbani R, Akdemir KC, Aksoy BA, Albert M, Ally A, Amin SB, et al. Genomic classification of cutaneous melanoma. Cell. 2015;161:1681–96.
Gao J, Aksoy BA, Dogrusoz U, Dresdner G, Gross B, Sumer SO, et al. Integrative analysis of complex cancer genomics and clinical profiles using the cBioPortal. Sci Signal. 2013;6:pl1–pl1.
Cerami E, Gao J, Dogrusoz U, Gross BE, Sumer SO, Aksoy BA, et al. The cBio cancer genomics portal: an open platform for exploring multidimensional cancer genomics data. Cancer Disco. 2012;2:401–4.
Stransky N, Cerami E, Schalm S, Kim JL, Lengauer C. The landscape of kinase fusions in cancer. Nat Commun. 2014;5. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms5846.
Lehmann BD, Shaver TM, Johnson DB, Li Z, Gonzalez-Ericsson PI, Sanchez V, et al. Identification of targetable recurrent MAP3K8 rearrangements in melanomas lacking known driver mutations. Mol Cancer Res. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-19-0257.
Chakraborty R, Hampton OA, Shen X, Simko SJ, Shih A, Abhyankar H, et al. Mutually exclusive recurrent somatic mutations in MAP2K1 and BRAF support a central role for ERK activation in LCH pathogenesis. Blood. 2014;124:3007–15.
Yeh I, Lang UE, Durieux E, Tee MK, Jorapur A, Shain AH, et al. Combined activation of MAP kinase pathway and β-catenin signaling cause deep penetrating nevi. Nat Commun. 2017;8:644.
Phillips JJ, Gong H, Chen K, Joseph NM, van Ziffle J, Jin L-W, et al. Activating NRF1-BRAF and ATG7-RAF1 fusions in anaplastic pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma without BRAF p.V600E mutation. Acta Neuropathol. 2016;132:757–60.
Huang FW, Hodis E, Xu MJ, Kryukov GV, Chin L, Garraway LA. Highly recurrent TERT promoter mutations in human melanoma. Science. 2013;339:957–9.
Horn S, Figl A, Rachakonda PS, Fischer C, Sucker A, Gast A, et al. TERT promoter mutations in familial and sporadic melanoma. Science. 2013;339:959–61.
Han S-Y, Kato H, Kato S, Suzuki T, Shibata H, Ishii S, et al. Functional evaluation of PTEN missense mutations using in vitro phosphoinositide phosphatase assay. Cancer Res. 2000;60:3147–51.
Valentijn LJ, Koster J, Zwijnenburg DA, Hasselt NE, van Sluis P, Volckmann R, et al. TERT rearrangements are frequent in neuroblastoma and identify aggressive tumors. Nat Genet. 2015;47:1411–4.
Yao Z, Yaeger R, Rodrik-Outmezguine VS, Tao A, Torres NM, Chang MT, et al. Tumours with class 3 BRAF mutants are sensitive to the inhibition of activated RAS. Nature. 2017;548:234.
Nyström A-M, Ekvall S, Berglund E, Björkqvist M, Braathen G, Duchen K, et al. Noonan and cardio-facio-cutaneous syndromes: two clinically and genetically overlapping disorders. J Med Genet. 2008;45:500–6.
Senawong T, Phuchareon J, Ohara O, McCormick F, Rauen KA, Tetsu O. Germline mutations of MEK in cardio-facio-cutaneous syndrome are sensitive to MEK and RAF inhibition: implications for therapeutic options. Hum Mol Genet. 2008;17:419–30.
Gos M, Smigiel R, Kaczan T, Landowska A, Abramowicz A, Sasiadek M, et al. MAP2K2 mutation as a cause of cardio-facio-cutaneous syndrome in an infant with a severe and fatal course of the disease. Am J Med Genet A. 2018;176:1670–4.
Souroullas GP, Jeck WR, Parker JS, Simon JM, Liu J-Y, Paulk J, et al. An oncogenic Ezh2 mutation induces tumors through global redistribution of histone 3 lysine 27 trimethylation. Nat Med. 2016;22:632–40.
Parsons DW, Jones S, Zhang X, Lin JC-H, Leary RJ, Angenendt P, et al. An integrated genomic analysis of human glioblastoma multiforme. Science. 2008;321:1807–12.
Zhao S, Lin Y, Xu W, Jiang W, Zha Z, Wang P, et al. Glioma-derived mutations in IDH1 dominantly inhibit IDH1 catalytic activity and induce HIF-1alpha. Science. 2009;324:261–5.
Shain AH, Garrido M, Botton T, Talevich E, Yeh I, Sanborn JZ, et al. Exome sequencing of desmoplastic melanoma identifies recurrent NFKBIE promoter mutations and diverse activating mutations in the MAPK pathway. Nat Genet. 2015;47:1194–9.
Curtin JA, Busam K, Pinkel D, Bastian BC. Somatic activation of KIT in distinct subtypes of melanoma. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24: 4340–6.
Nikolaev SI, Rimoldi D, Iseli C, Valsesia A, Robyr D, Gehrig C, et al. Exome sequencing identifies recurrent somatic MAP2K1 and MAP2K2 mutations in melanoma. Nat Genet. 2012;44:133–9.
Cellier L, Perron E, Pissaloux D, Karanian M, Haddad V, Alberti L, et al. Cutaneous melanocytoma With CRTC1-TRIM11 fusion: report of 5 cases resembling clear cell sarcoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 2018;42:382–91.
Lee S, Barnhill RL, Dummer R, Dalton J, Wu J, Pappo A, et al. TERT promoter mutations are predictive of aggressive clinical behavior in patients with spitzoid melanocytic neoplasms. Sci Rep. 2015;5:11200.
Griewank KG, Murali R, Puig-Butille JA, Schilling B, Livingstone E, Potrony M, et al. TERT promoter mutation status as an independent prognostic factor in cutaneous melanoma. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014;106:dju246.
Gerami P, Scolyer RA, Xu X, Elder DE, Abraham RM, Fullen D, et al. Risk assessment for atypical spitzoid melanocytic neoplasms using FISH to identify chromosomal copy number aberrations. Am J Surg Pathol. 2013;37:676–84.
Dubruc E, Balme B, Dijoud F, Disant F, Thomas L, Wang Q, et al. Mutated and amplified NRAS in a subset of cutaneous melanocytic lesions with dermal spitzoid morphology: report of two pediatric cases located on the ear. J Cutan Pathol. 2014;41:866–72.
Wiesner T, Murali R, Fried I, Cerroni L, Busam K, Kutzner H, et al. A distinct subset of atypical Spitz tumors is characterized by BRAF mutation and loss of BAP1 expression. Am J Surg Pathol. 2012;36:818–30.
Busam KJ, Sung J, Wiesner T, von Deimling A, Jungbluth A. Combined BRAF(V600E)-positive melanocytic lesions with large epithelioid cells lacking BAP1 expression and conventional nevomelanocytes. Am J Surg Pathol. 2013;37:193–9.
Yeh I, Mully TW, Wiesner T, Vemula SS, Mirza SA, Sparatta AJ, et al. Ambiguous melanocytic tumors with loss of 3p21. Am J Surg Pathol. 2014;38:1088–95.
Vilain RE, McCarthy SW, Thompson JF, Scolyer RA. BAP1-inactivated spitzoid naevi. Am J Surg Pathol. 2015;39:722.
Cohen JN, Joseph NM, North JP, Onodera C, Zembowicz A, LeBoit PE. Genomic analysis of pigmented epithelioid melanocytomas reveals recurrent alterations in PRKAR1A, and PRKCA genes. Am J Surg Pathol. 2017;41:1333–46.
LaFave LM, Béguelin W, Koche R, Teater M, Spitzer B, Chramiec A, et al. Loss of BAP1 function leads to EZH2-dependent transformation. Nat Med. 2015;21:1344–9.
Acknowledgements
We thank Connie Jang and Yvonne Lee for their assistance in organizing and obtaining the cases. SR was funded in part by the American Society of Dermatopathology Mentorship Award, and Sandra Peternel was supported by a grant from the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (RF-2017-17). This work was supported by the National Cancer Institute at the National Institutes of Health (grant number 1R35CA220481).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Raghavan, S.S., Peternel, S., Mully, T.W. et al. Spitz melanoma is a distinct subset of spitzoid melanoma. Mod Pathol 33, 1122–1134 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41379-019-0445-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41379-019-0445-z
This article is cited by
-
Operative Therapie von Nävi bei Kindern in einem dermatochirurgischen Zentrum
Die Dermatologie (2023)
-
Morphologic features in a series of 352 Spitz melanocytic proliferations help predict their oncogenic drivers
Virchows Archiv (2022)
-
Expanding spectrum of “spitzoid” lesions: a small series of 4 cases with MAP2K1 mutations
Virchows Archiv (2021)
-
ESP, EORTC, and EURACAN Expert Opinion: practical recommendations for the pathological diagnosis and clinical management of intermediate melanocytic tumors and rare related melanoma variants
Virchows Archiv (2021)
-
Giant lung metastasis of NRAS-mutant melanoma in a 24-year-old patient with a history of BRAF-mutant conventional melanoma harboring Spitzoid morphology: a case report
Diagnostic Pathology (2020)