Incidence and distribution of UroSEEK gene panel in a multi-institutional cohort of bladder urothelial carcinoma


Noninvasive approaches for early detection of bladder cancer are actively being investigated. We recently developed a urine- based molecular assay for the detection and surveillance of bladder neoplasms (UroSEEK). UroSEEK is designed to detect alterations in 11 genes that include most common genetic alterations in bladder cancer. In this study, we analyzed 527 cases, including 373 noninvasive and 154 invasive urothelial carcinomas of bladder from transurethral resections or cystectomies performed at four institutions (1991–2016). Two different mutational analysis assays of a representative tumor area were performed: first, a singleplex PCR assay for evaluation of the TERT promoter region (TERTSeqS) and second, a multiplex PCR assay using primers designed to amplify regions of interest of 10 (FGFR3, PIK3CA, TP53, HRAS, KRAS, ERBB2, CDKN2A, MET, MLL, and VHL) genes (UroSeqS). Overall, 92% of all bladder tumors were positive for at least one genetic alteration in the UroSEEK panel. We found TERT promoter mutations in 77% of low-grade noninvasive papillary carcinomas, with a relatively lower incidence of 65% in high-grade noninvasive papillary carcinomas and carcinomas in situ; p = 0.017. Seventy-two percent of pT1 and 63% of muscle-invasive bladder tumors harbored TERT promoter mutations with g.1295228C>T alteration being the most common in all groups. FGFR3 and PIK3CA mutations were more frequent in low-grade noninvasive papillary carcinomas compared with high-grade noninvasive papillary carcinomas and carcinomas in situ (p < 0.0001), while the opposite was true for TP53 (p < 0.0001). Significantly higher rates of TP53 and CDKN2A mutation rates (p = 0.005 and 0.035, respectively) were encountered in muscle-invasive bladder tumors compared with those of pT1 stage. The overwhelming majority of all investigated tumors showed at least one mutation among UroSEEK assay genes, confirming the comprehensive coverage of the panel and supporting its potential utility as a noninvasive urine-based assay.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2


  1. 1.

    Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2019. CA Cancer J Clin. 2019;69:7–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Netto GJ. Clinical applications of recent molecular advances in urologic malignancies: no longer chasing a “mirage”? Adv Anat Pathol. 2013;20:175–203.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Chamie K, Litwin MS, Bassett JC, Daskivich TJ, Lai J, Hanley JM, et al. Recurrence of high-risk bladder cancer: a population-based analysis. Cancer. 2013;119:3219–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Millan-Rodriguez F, Chechile-Toniolo G, Salvador-Bayarri J, Palou J, Algaba F, Vicente-Rodriguez J. Primary superficial bladder cancer risk groups according to progression, mortality and recurrence. J Urol. 2000;164:680–4.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Chang SS, Boorjian SA, Chou R, Clark PE, Daneshmand S, Konety BR, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer: AUA/SUO Guideline. J Urol. 2016;196:1021–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Babjuk M, Bohle A, Burger M, Capoun O, Cohen D, Comperat EM, et al. EAU guidelines on non-muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder: update 2016. Eur Urol. 2017;71:447–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Netto GJ, Epstein JI. Theranostic and prognostic biomarkers: genomic applications in urological malignancies. Pathology. 2010;42:384–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Wood PW. Urothelial Tumors of the Bladder. In: Wein AJ, Kavoussi LR, Novick AC, Partin AW, Peters CA, editors. Campbell-Walsh Urology. 10th edn. Philadelphia, PA Elsevier Saunders, 2012. p.2309–34.

  9. 9.

    Davis R, Jones JS, Barocas DA, Castle EP, Lang EK, Leveillee RJ, et al. Diagnosis, evaluation and follow-up of asymptomatic microhematuria (AMH) in adults: AUA guideline. J Urol. 2012;188:2473–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Davis R, Jones JS, Barocas DA et al. Diagnosis, Evaluation and Follow-up of Asymptomatic Microhematuria (AMH) in Adults, 2016, [cited 10/10/2018].

  11. 11.

    Smith ZL, Guzzo TJ. Urinary markers for bladder cancer. F1000Prime Rep. 2013;5:21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    O'Sullivan P, Sharples K, Dalphin M, Davidson P, Gilling P, Cambridge L, et al. A multigene urine test for the detection and stratification of bladder cancer in patients presenting with hematuria. J Urol. 2012;188:741–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Wang Z, Que H, Suo C, Han Z, Tao J, Huang Z, et al. Evaluation of the NMP22 BladderChek test for detecting bladder cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Oncotarget. 2017;8:100648–56.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    He H, Han C, Hao L, Zang G. ImmunoCyt test compared to cytology in the diagnosis of bladder cancer: a meta-analysis. Oncol Lett. 2016;12:83–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Lavery HJ, Zaharieva B, McFaddin A, Heerema N, Pohar KS. A prospective comparison of UroVysion FISH and urine cytology in bladder cancer detection. BMC Cancer. 2017;17:247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Lokeshwar VB, Habuchi T, Grossman HB, Murphy WM, Hautmann SH, Hemstreet GP, et al. Bladder tumor markers beyond cytology: International Consensus Panel on bladder tumor markers. Urology. 2005;66:35–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Guo A, Wang X, Gao L, Shi J, Sun C, Wan Z. Bladder tumour antigen (BTA stat) test compared to the urine cytology in the diagnosis of bladder cancer: a meta-analysis. Can Urol Assoc J. 2014;8:E347–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Chou R, Gore JL, Buckley D, Fu R, Gustafson K, Griffin JC, et al. Urinary biomarkers for diagnosis of bladder cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2015;163:922–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Springer SU, Chen CH, Rodriguez Pena MDC, Li L, Douville C, Wang Y, et al. Non-invasive detection of urothelial cancer through the analysis of driver gene mutations and aneuploidy. Elife. 2018;7:pii: e43237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Kinde I, Munari E, Faraj SF, Hruban RH, Schoenberg M, Bivalacqua T, et al. TERT promoter mutations occur early in urothelial neoplasia and are biomarkers of early disease and disease recurrence in urine. Cancer Res. 2013;73:7162–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Killela PJ, Reitman ZJ, Jiao Y, Bettegowda C, Agrawal N, Diaz LA, et al. TERT promoter mutations occur frequently in gliomas and a subset of tumors derived from cells with low rates of self-renewal. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013;110:6021–6.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Hedegaard J, Lamy P, Nordentoft I, Algaba F, Hoyer S, Ulhoi BP, et al. Comprehensive transcriptional analysis of early-stage urothelial carcinoma. Cancer Cell. 2016;30:27–42.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Robertson AG, Kim J, Al-Ahmadie H, Bellmunt J, Guo G, Cherniack AD, et al. Comprehensive molecular characterization of muscle-invasive bladder. Cancer Cell. 2017;171:540–56. e25.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Tan TZ, Rouanne M, Tan KT, Huang RY, Thiery JP. Molecular subtypes of urothelial bladder cancer: results from a meta-cohort analysis of 2411 tumors. Eur Urol. 2019;75:423–32.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Rodriguez Pena MDC, Tregnago AC, Eich ML, Springer S, Wang Y, Taheri D, et al. Spectrum of genetic mutations in de novo PUNLMP of the urinary bladder. Virchows Arch. 2017;471:761–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Nguyen D, Taheri D, Springer S, Cowan M, Guner G, Mendoza Rodriguez MA, et al. High prevalence of TERT promoter mutations in micropapillary urothelial carcinoma. Virchows Arch. 2016;469:427–34.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Kinde I, Bettegowda C, Wang Y, Wu J, Agrawal N, Shih Ie M, et al. Evaluation of DNA from the Papanicolaou test to detect ovarian and endometrial cancers. Sci Transl Med. 2013;5:167ra4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Kinde I, Wu J, Papadopoulos N, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B. Detection and quantification of rare mutations with massively parallel sequencing. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108:9530–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Kim PH, Cha EK, Sfakianos JP, Iyer G, Zabor EC, Scott SN, et al. Genomic predictors of survival in patients with high-grade urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. Eur Urol. 2015;67:198–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Hurst CD, Alder O, Platt FM, Droop A, Stead LF, Burns JE, et al. Genomic subtypes of non-invasive bladder cancer with distinct metabolic profile and female gender bias in KDM6A mutation frequency. Cancer Cell. 2017;32:701–15. e7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Cowan M, Springer S, Nguyen D, Taheri D, Guner G, Rodriguez MA, et al. High prevalence of TERT promoter mutations in primary squamous cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder. Mod Pathol. 2016;29:511–5.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Cowan ML, Springer S, Nguyen D, Taheri D, Guner G, Mendoza Rodriguez MA, et al. Detection of TERT promoter mutations in primary adenocarcinoma of the urinary bladder. Hum Pathol. 2016;53:8–13.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Palsgrove DN, Taheri D, Springer SU, et al. Targeted sequencing of Plasmacytoid urothelial carcinoma reveals frequent TERT promoter mutations. Hum Pathol. 2018;85:1–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Pietzak EJ, Bagrodia A, Cha EK, Drill EN, Iyer G, Isharwal S, et al. Next-generation sequencing of nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer reveals potential biomarkers and rational therapeutic targets. Eur Urol. 2017;72:952–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


We are grateful for the generous support provided by the Johns Hopkins Greenberg Bladder Cancer Institute, Henry and Marsha Laufer, the Virginia and DK Ludwig Fund for Cancer Research, the Commonwealth Foundation, the John Templeton Foundation, and the Conrad R Hilton Foundation. All sequencing was performed at the Sol Goldman Sequencing Facility at Johns Hopkins. This work was also supported by grants from the NIH (Grants CA-77598, CA 06973, GM 07309, and ES019564).

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to George J. Netto.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

NP, KWK, and BV: founders of Personal Genome Diagnostics and PapGene and advisors to Sysmex-Inostics. KWK and BV also advise Eisai. BV is also an advisor to Camden Partners. These companies and others have licensed technologies from Johns Hopkins that are related to the work described in this paper. These licenses are associated with equity or royalty payments to NP, KWK, GJN, and BV. Additional patent applications on the work described in this paper may be filed by Johns Hopkins University. The terms of these arrangements are managed by the university in accordance with its conflict of interest policies. The remaining authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Eich, M., Rodriguez Pena, M.D.C., Springer, S.U. et al. Incidence and distribution of UroSEEK gene panel in a multi-institutional cohort of bladder urothelial carcinoma. Mod Pathol 32, 1544–1550 (2019).

Download citation

Further reading