Thermometry of photosensitive and optically induced electrokinetics chips

Abstract

Optically induced electrokinetics (OEK)-based technologies, which integrate the high-resolution dynamic addressability of optical tweezers and the high-throughput capability of electrokinetic forces, have been widely used to manipulate, assemble, and separate biological and non-biological entities in parallel on scales ranging from micrometers to nanometers. However, simultaneously introducing optical and electrical energy into an OEK chip may induce a problematic temperature increase, which poses the potential risk of exceeding physiological conditions and thus inducing variations in cell behavior or activity or even irreversible cell damage during bio-manipulation. Here, we systematically measure the temperature distribution and changes in an OEK chip arising from the projected images and applied alternating current (AC) voltage using an infrared camera. We have found that the average temperature of a projected area is influenced by the light color, total illumination area, ratio of lighted regions to the total controlled areas, and amplitude of the AC voltage. As an example, optically induced thermocapillary flow is triggered by the light image-induced temperature gradient on a photosensitive substrate to realize fluidic hydrogel patterning. Our studies show that the projected light pattern needs to be properly designed to satisfy specific application requirements, especially for applications related to cell manipulation and assembly.

Introduction

In the past two decades, optically induced electrokinetics (OEK)-based technologies have rapidly extended into research fields such as manipulation, fabrication and assembly on the micro/nanoscale because of their superior ability to provide flexible, dynamic, non-invasive, high-resolution, and high-throughput approaches compared to traditional modalities (e.g., electrophoresis, dielectrophoresis, optical tweezers, magnetic tweezers, and acoustic traps)1. In 1995, Mizuno et al. used a focused laser beam to trigger a microvortex in liquid films to which a high-frequency electric field was applied enabling DNA translation and stretching2,3. By adjusting the local conductivity of an indium tin oxide (ITO) electrode using ultraviolet (UV) illumination to control electrophoretic deposition, Hayward et al. achieved the assembly of colloidal particles with diameters from submicrometers to 2 μm in the lighted regions4. By replacing the focused laser beam with a programmable illumination system and applying a highly efficient photoconductive material, Chiou et al. demonstrated an optical image-driven dielectrophoresis technique, usually referred to as optoelectronic tweezers (OETs) or optically induced dielectrophoresis (ODEP), for the parallel high-resolution manipulation of cells or microparticles5. ODEP retains the dynamic addressability of optical tweezers and high-throughput material selectivity of traditional dielectrophoresis while requiring five orders of magnitude less optical intensity than optical tweezers6. In addition to ODEP, a series of OEK-based phenomena have been explored, such as optoelectrowetting7, light-actuated alternating current (AC) electroosmosis8, light-actuated AC electrothermal flow9, optically induced electrohydrodynamic instability10,11, and optically induced electrochemistry12,13. These methods have been widely used to manipulate single cells or DNA molecules14 in parallel5, concentrate and transport multiple Escherichia coli cells15, trap single-wall and multi-wall carbon nanotubes16,17, manipulate and separate semiconducting and metallic nanowires18, control local pH or chemical concentration19,20, and fabricate microlens arrays21 and semiconducting/metallic devices12,13.

The realization of these methods depends on ingenious applications of photosensitive electrodes that usually contain a photoconductive layer (e.g., hydrogenated amorphous silicon (a-Si:H)5, single-crystalline bipolar junction transistors22, or bulk-heterojunction polymers23) and a transparent ITO electrode. When integrated with another ITO counter electrode, this photosensitive electrode is usually referred to as an OEK chip21,24. Dynamic or programmable manipulation is commonly triggered through the optical images generated by a digital micromirror device (DMD)5,8,20, a projector9,21,24, or a liquid-crystal-based spatial light modulator25,26. The constructed light images are usually focused by objectives with different magnifications for different applications by considering, e.g., the operational field of view, resolution, and required minimum virtual electrodes5,13,21. The absorbance of incident photons in the photoconductive layer induces the generation of electron-hole pairs and phonons, causing local conductivity and temperature increases, respectively27. Through the exploration of these temperature gradients generated in OEK chips, optically controlled bubble microrobots have been shown to manipulate microbeads and assemble microblocks and cell-encapsulating hydrogel beads based on the optically induced thermocapillary effect28,29. Additionally, the Joule heating driven by the applied electric field increases the temperature in the OEK chip further, similar to the conditions of dielectrophoresis (DEP)-based manipulations27,30. For biological applications, small temperature differences may induce significant variations in cell behavior and activity and protein reactivity30,31,32. Irreversible cell damage or death can arise from either a short, sharp increase or a sustained moderate increase in temperature33,34. The buffer temperature needs to be controlled such that it does not exceed physiological conditions by more than 3 °C for prolonged amounts of time to avoid the generation of any kind of hyperthermic stress in the cells30. Though OEK-based micro/nano manipulation and fabrication have been widely studied, systematic spatial and temporal temperature increases on OEK chips induced by illumination color and pattern have not been reported. Studying the OEK chip thermal effect is essential to facilitate further temperature control for various applications.

Here, we present systematic measurements of the temperature distribution and changes over time in an OEK chip and a photoconductive substrate. The influences of light color, projected image shape, image size, light distribution, and applied AC parameters on the temperature increase have been explored using an infrared (IR) camera that enables contactless transient temperature profile measurement without interfering with the thermal performance of the original system. To reveal the temperature distribution inside the OEK chip, we perform simulations based on the experimental parameters with results that are highly consistent with the experimental observations. The temperature distribution in cells dispersed in different areas of the OEK chip is studied by simulation. As a representative application of the light image-induced temperature gradient on a photosensitive substrate, fluidic hydrogel patterning driven by optically induced thermocapillary flow is proposed.

Materials and methods

Experimental setup

The OEK chip photoconductive electrode used in our experiments is comprised of a 120 nm ITO layer sputtered onto 600-μm-glass and a ~1 μm a-Si:H layer deposited onto the ITO layer through plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD). The thicknesses of the ITO and glass layers of the upper transparent ITO electrode are ~ 120 nm and ~ 1 mm, respectively. These two electrodes are separated by ~ 100-μm-thick double adhesive tape. The OEK chip is placed between a 50× objective (Nikon TU Plan EPI ELWD, Japan) focusing the light images generated by a commercial projector (VPL-F400X, Sony, Japan) and an optical microscope (Zoom 160, Optem, USA), as shown in Fig. 1a (schematic diagram) and Supplementary Figure S1 (actual photograph). Different colors generated by the projector are created by mixing different ratios of filtered red, green and blue light, which means the colors (e.g., “cyan” and “yellow”) are real. The photoconductive layer is placed at the working plane of the lower and upper objectives (Fig. 1a). The position of the OEK chip is adjusted by a three-dimensional translation platform (Leetro Automation Co. Ltd, China). When the chip temperature distribution is being monitored, the optical microscope is replaced by an IR camera (ImageIR4320, InfraTec GmbH, Germany), as shown in Supplementary Figure S1. The AC bias potential applied on the two ITO layers of the OEK chip is supplied by a function generator (Agilent 33522A, USA). For clarity, the OEK chip is called a photosensitive (PS) chip when the amplitude of AC potential is set to zero, i.e., a special case of OEK. Before the experiments, we first compare the hotplate temperature measured by the IR camera and a thermocouple sensor (#6212158, #5120288, RS Components Ltd) at several set points. The results show that these two methods are highly consistent (Supplementary Figure S2).

Fig. 1: Temperature measurement of the OEK or PS chip.
figure1

a Key experimental components used in the thermal imaging experiments. Temperature distribution on b the lower objective and c, d the OEK chip measured by an infrared camera. AC voltage with an amplitude of 20 Vpp and a frequency of 50 kHz was applied to the OEK chip. The OEK chip was illuminated by cyan-color light

Results and discussion

Objective temperature

In our experiments, the objective working distance used to focus the projected images is ~10 mm, which may be close enough to heat the chip. The situation is worsened as the objective magnification increases or the working distance decreases. Therefore, we first examine the objective temperature increase upon illumination with projected light of different colors, such as red, blue, green, yellow and cyan with the spectrum shown in Supplementary Figure S3a. The projected images fill the rear objective aperture with single color light. The temperature distribution around the objective lens is shown in Fig. 1b. The average temperature in the middle area of the front objective lens is used to represent the objective temperature (the red region in Fig. 1b). Initially, the light color is adjusted to black, corresponding to the standby situation before manipulation, and the objective temperature gradually increases to a steady temperature of ~32 °C after illumination for ~1 h (Supplementary Figure S4a). The objective temperature increases as the light color is adjusted from black to other colors, and the rate of increase changes with the illumination color (Fig. 2a). When the projector is turned on and off with a switch duration of 150 or 60 s, the objective temperature shows evident thermal inertia (Supplementary Figure S4b, c).

Fig. 2
figure2

a Temperature of the objective illuminated by light with different colors. b Temperature changes of photoconductive substrate with the illumination time and colors monitored by an infrared (IR) camera or a thermocouple (TC) sensor. Different line colors represent different illumination colors

Photoconductive substrate temperature

Before studying the OEK chip, we first measured the temperature distribution and changes in the a-Si:H photoconductive substrate. When the objective reaches a steady temperature (~32 °C) under black illumination, the photoconductive substrate is directly placed on the pre-adjusted three-dimensional translation platform, enabling it to be laid on the focal plane of the lower objective (Fig. 1c). When the rear objective aperture is filled with light in our experimental setup, the focused light image on the photoconductive substrate is a solid circle with a diameter of ~773 μm. The size of this area is denoted Sfull. The average temperature extracted from this area is used for further analysis. As the photoconductive substrate is illuminated with light, the temperature increases quickly in the focus area (Fig. 2b) with a faster response than the objective (Fig. 2b and Supplementary Figure S4b). A net temperature increase of up to 20 °C from an initial temperature of ~21 °C is measured when the photoconductive substrate is illuminated with cyan light. The temperature measured by the thermocouple sensor is smaller than the minimum temperature detected by the IR camera (Fig. 2b), which may arise from the disruption of the thermal condition by introducing the thermocouple sensor. The diameter of the thermocouple sensor sensing unit is ~600 μm, which matches the illumination area. The photoconductive substrate optically induced thermal response is faster than the objective (Supplementary Figure S4 and S5), indicating that the temperature change in the substrate is mainly induced by the absorption of the projected light and that this illumination setup represents an efficient means of adjusting the temperature or establishing a temperature gradient.

When the photoconductive substrate is illuminated by projected light patterns with the same size but different shapes, the average temperature does not show an apparent reliance on the light pattern shapes (Supplementary Figure S6). However, the average temperature does decrease as the light patterns shrink (Supplementary Figures S6 and S7). When the total light size is the same, the light distribution in a certain area does not have a clear influence on the measured temperature; however, the steady temperature decreases as the total illumination area or the dark area increases (Supplementary Figure S8). In other words, the average temperature increases with the ratio of lighted to total controlled areas.

PS and OEK chip temperature

When the photoconductive electrode is encapsulated in PS chips filled with different fluids (air, deionized water, or isotonic solution), the measured temperature is less than the bare photoconductive electrode for each light color at the same detection time without applying AC voltage (Figs. 2, 3). Conversely, the OEK chip temperature increases with the applied AC amplitude but does not show an apparent dependence on the frequency when there is no illumination, which is consistent with prior analyses related to Joule heating in DEP manipulations35 (Fig. 4a). Without illumination, the maximum temperature increase induced by Joule heating in our experiments is ~2 °C when a 20 Vpp AC voltage is applied to the OEK chip, which is smaller than the temperature increase induced by light illumination (5–11 °C for different colored light). When illumination and AC voltage are applied to the OEK chip simultaneously, the temperature increases quickly and far exceeds the cases when they are used separately (Fig. 4a). Under these conditions, the light pattern increases the local conductivity of the photoconductive layer by triggering electron-hole pair generation, which transfers the AC voltage to the liquid layer and thus induces more Joule heating there (\(q \propto \sigma \times U_{{\mathrm{rms}}}^2\), where q is the heating power per volume element, σ is the liquid conductivity, and Urms is the root-mean-square voltage35).

Fig. 3: The relationship between temperature change in the PS chip and illumination time and color as monitored by an IR camera.
figure3

Different color symbols represent different illumination colors. Squares, circles and rectangles, respectively, represent air, water and isotonic solution filled in the PS chip

Fig. 4
figure4

a Influence of illumination color and AC voltage on the temperature of OEK chips filled with an isotonic solution consisting of 8.5% (w/v) sucrose and 0.3% (w/v) glucose with conductivity of 1.3 × 10−2 S/m. b Schematic showing the OEK chip in these experiments. c The influence of illumination color on the DEP force applied to a 10 μm polystyrene bead

Figure 4c shows that the maximum DEP force calculated by finite element method software (COMSOL) decreases with the optical wavelength increase according to the Fermi-Dirac function when the optical power is the same, which indicates that the ODEP force arises from electron-hole carrier generation in the photoconductive substrate36. Since both the temperature increase and DEP force rely on the wavelength, the optimized DEP force may not be best for biomanipulation, i.e., the best color for maximizing the DEP force may induce a serious temperature increase (Fig. 4).

The internal three-dimensional temperature distribution of the OEK chip is difficult to directly measure using an IR camera. To map the temperature distribution in an OEK chip, we performed transient simulation by COMSOL. Because the temperature increase induced by illumination is more apparent than Joule heating, this simulation only considers illumination (Fig. 5). To match the experimental conditions, the temperature change in the objective over time measured by the IR camera (Supplementary Figure S4b) is imported into the simulation model. The simulated temperature distribution at 280 s (Fig. 5b, c) and the transient changes (Supplementary Figure S9) in the PS chip and the photoconductive substrate are highly consistent with the experimental results. Based on these simulations, we can acquire an accurate temperature distribution of the liquid inside the PS chip (Fig. 5d). When we add cell models to this simulation, the temperature distribution in cells in different areas of the PS chip can be determined. Supplementary Figure S10 shows that the maximum temperature difference in cells with a diameter of 20 μm can reach 0.7 °C for those around the illumination area and decreases from the lighted middle area to the surrounding region. This temperature gradient will induce thermophoresis in the cell, influencing molecular movement across the cytoplasm37. The temperature gradient along the PS chip will also influence the viability and activity of cells located in different positions31. Therefore, for biological applications, the light pattern must be properly designed to generate heat satisfying the cell requirements, and the temperature gradient must be decreased to minimize negative effects, e.g., thermophoresis. A heat sink or a stage temperature controller may be required, in which case a reflective OEK system where the projected light images for manipulation are focused by the optical microscope objective is facilitated to realize this function33,38.

Fig. 5
figure5

a Temperature distribution in the PS chip induced by illumination measured by an IR camera. The comparison between the experimental and simulated b temperature distribution and c temperature along the bottom line in b, d. Simulated temperature distribution around the PS chip corresponding to the marked area in a. Scale bars, 1 cm (a); 0.2 cm (b, d)

Optically induced thermocapillary flow

Although the temperature gradient can potentially induce damage to biological samples, it can also play a positive role in non-biological manipulation, assembly and fabrication. Temperature gradients can create surface tension gradients, and therefore, thermocapillary effects have been harnessed using prefabricated resistive heating elements to manipulate liquid droplets39. However, this method lacks flexibility and shows low-resolution addressability. An optically absorbing liquid is required for thermal gradients generated by the absorption of a laser in a liquid with greater flexibility to achieve the proposed thermocapillary-driven bubble or droplet movement; however, the choice of liquid is confined by physical and chemical properties40. When a photoconductive substrate is illuminated with light, it generates a local temperature increase (Fig. 1d), thereby providing a flexible approach to modulate a local temperature gradient field on the substrate and in the liquid media above it using arbitrary projected light images. The manipulation of gas bubbles in oil41 or water29 was demonstrated using light-induced thermocapillary effects. The use of a photosensitive substrate instead of absorbing liquids improves flexibility because it makes the optically induced thermocapillary effect independent of the optical properties of the manipulated liquids41.

Here, we propose that the patterning of thin hydrogel films can be realized by optically induced thermocapillary flow on a photoconductive substrate, which also demonstrates the temperature difference in PS or OEK chips. Initially, an ~1 μm poly(ethylene) glycol diacrylate (PEGDA, Mw = 10 kDa, Mn = 575; Sigma Aldrich) film is spun onto the photosensitive substrate. Optically induced thermocapillary flow can be triggered when 6.8 W/cm2 green light images illuminate the photosensitive substrate. A light grid image with period of ~75 μm and light width of ~14 μm is used in this experiment. For optically induced thermocapillary flow, external voltage is not applied. As shown in Fig. 6a–d, the hydrogel is driven from warmer (lighted area) to cooler (dark area) regions under the effect of interfacial shear stress (TST) triggered by the light-induced temperature gradient TST = dγ/dx = (dγ/dϑ) × (dϑ/dx), where γ is the surface tension and ϑ is the temperature. As a result of this thermally induced liquid movement, the total surface energy is minimized. A multiphysics simulation of thermocapillary flow on photosensitive substrates is conducted using COMSOL. The simulated stationary solutions are shown in Fig. 6e. The shear stress at the interface between the hydrogel film and air and the velocity of the hydrogel fluidic layer point toward the dark areas from the illuminated areas consistent with the experimental observations. The patterned PEGDA can be further solidified by UV illumination, which has potential applications in the study of cell behavior24.

Fig. 6: Optically induced thermocapillary flow for fluidic hydrogel patterning.
figure6

ad Experimental observation and e simulation study of optically induced thermocapillary flow. The color table represents the temperature distribution in the liquid layer. Scale bars, 50 μm (d)

Optically induced thermocapillary flow can also be used as pre-procedure to trigger other fluidic phenomena, e.g., electrohydrodynamic instability (EHDI) and to fabricate micro/nanostructures (Fig. 7). EHDI appears when an applied electric field overcomes surface tension in thin films that are spun onto a lower electrode and separated from an upper electrode by another medium (air, polymer or an ionic liquid)10,11,42. Initially, a polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS, Dow Corning, Sylgard-184) ~1.7-μm-thick film is spun onto the photosensitive substrate of the OEK chip, in which two aluminum foils are used to separate the two electrodes at a distance of ~11 μm. After a 216-s illumination by a projected green light pattern with intensity of 6.8 W/cm2 (Fig. 7a, b), a pre-pattern appears under the action of optically induced thermocapillary flow (Fig. 7c) in the PDMS layer, which generates instability nucleation sites in the dark areas. The illumination is turned off at 216 s, and electrohydrodynamic instability is triggered at the instability nucleation sites when a 250-V direct current (DC) voltage is applied by a voltage source (Keithley 2410). After 96 s, a micropillar array can be generated at the nucleation sites as the electrical forces (Nelec) overcome surface tension (Fig. 7e). (\(N_{{\mathrm{elec}}} = {\mathbf{n}} \cdot {\mathbf{m}} \cdot {\mathbf{n}} = \left\| {\varepsilon \varepsilon _0\left( {{\mathbf{E}} \cdot {\mathbf{n}}} \right)^2 - \varepsilon \varepsilon _0\left( {{\mathbf{E}} \cdot {\mathbf{t}}} \right)^2} \right\|/2\), where n and t are the local outer normal and tangent vectors on the interface, E is the electric field, εε0 represents the dielectric permittivity, and denotes the jump of operand across the interface.). Separating the two electrodes or applying a pulse instead of continuous DC voltage can facilitate the fabrication of a microlens array (Fig. 7f and Supplementary Figure S11). This process also demonstrates the optically induced thermocapillary function in the optically induced electrohydrodynamic instability proposed previously by our group10,11,21.

Fig. 7
figure7

Microstructures fabricated by optically induced thermocapillary flow-assisted electrohydrodynamic instability. a, b A PDMS thick film (~1.7 μm) was illuminated by green light pattern. c After a 216-s illumination, a pre-pattern was observed when the projector was turned off. d, e Electrohydrodynamic instability was triggered at the nucleation sites generated by the thermocapillary flow. f Microlens array fabricated by separating the two electrodes in d, e. Scale bars, 80 μm (f)

Conclusions

Similar to DEP chips, in which the Joule heating can be minimized by optimizing the microelectrode geometry35, the projected light patterns must be properly designed to control the temperature distribution in an OEK chip, especially in a parallel manipulation system5,6,8,26,43 where complex light images cover a large chip surface area. The average temperature in the projected area is influenced by the light color, the total illumination area and the ratio of lighted regions to the total controlled areas. The situation is worsened when illumination and AC voltage are applied simultaneously because of the optically induced change in OEK chip electrical properties. The design of the light pattern needs to satisfy different application requirements. For biological applications, the temperature must be controlled to match physiological conditions, thereby requiring the use of an adequate heat sink or a temperature controller. However, cases involving, e.g., the polymerase chain reaction44, temperature gradient focusing45, and optically induced thermocapillary flow require high accuracy and resolution in temperature values or distribution46. Objectives with larger magnification or numerical aperture may be required to generate more intensively focused light images with higher spatial resolution. However, as the magnification or numerical aperture increases, the objective working distance decreases and, therefore, the objective thermal effect on OEK chip temperature will be more serious. We expect that the experimental results presented in this paper will expand the applications of OEK technology in different fields, especially in bio-related applications.

References

  1. 1.

    Sun, Y. et al. Micro-and Nanomanipulation Tools, Vol. 13 (Wiley, Hoboken, 2015).

  2. 2.

    Mizuno, A., Nishioka, M., Ohno, V. & Dascalescu, L.-D. Liquid microvortex generated around a laser focal point in an intense high-frequency electric field. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. 31, 464–468 (1995).

  3. 3.

    Nakano, M., Kurita, H., Komatsu, J., Mizuno, A. & Katsura, S. Stretching of long DNA molecules in the microvortex induced by laser and ac electric field. Appl. Phys. Lett. 89, 133901–133903 (2006).

  4. 4.

    Hayward, R. C., Saville, D. A. & Aksay, I. A. Electrophoretic assembly of colloidal crystals with optically tunable micropatterns. Nature 404, 56–59 (2000).

  5. 5.

    Chiou, P. Y., Ohta, A. T. & Wu, M. C. Massively parallel manipulation of single cells and microparticles using optical images. Nature 436, 370–372 (2005).

  6. 6.

    Wu, M. C. Optoelectronic tweezers. Nat. Photonics 5, 322–324 (2011).

  7. 7.

    Park, S. Y., Teitell, M. A. & Chiou, E. P. Single-sided continuous optoelectrowetting (SCOEW) for droplet manipulation with light patterns. Lab Chip 10, 1655–1661 (2010).

  8. 8.

    Chiou, P. Y., Ohta, A. T., Jamshidi, A., Hsu, H. Y. & Wu, M. C. Light-actuated AC electroosmosis for nanoparticle manipulation. J. Micro Syst. 17, 525–531 (2008).

  9. 9.

    Jamshidi, A. et al. Nanopen: dynamic, low-power, and light-actuated patterning of nanoparticles. Nano Lett. 9, 2921–2925 (2009).

  10. 10.

    Wang, F. et al. Non-ultraviolet-based patterning of polymer structures by optically induced electrohydrodynamic instability. Appl. Phys. Lett. 103, 214101 (2013).

  11. 11.

    Wang, F. F. et al. Optically induced electrohydrodynamic instability-based micro-patterning of fluidic thin films. Microfluid. Nanofluidics 16, 1097–1106 (2014).

  12. 12.

    Li, P. et al. Silver nanostructures synthesis via optically induced electrochemical deposition. Sci. Rep. 6, 28035 (2016).

  13. 13.

    Liu, N. et al. Rapidly patterning micro/nano devices by directly assembling ions and nanomaterials. Sci. Rep. 6, 32106 (2016).

  14. 14.

    Lin, Y.-H., Chang, C.-M. & Lee, G.-B. Manipulation of single DNA molecules by using optically projected images. Opt. Express 17, 15318–15329 (2009).

  15. 15.

    Pei Yu, C., Wilson, W., Liao, J. C. & Wu, M. C. in 17th IEEE International Conference on Micro Electro Mechanical Systems. Maastricht MEMS 2004 Technical Digest. 21–24.

  16. 16.

    Pauzauskie, P. J., Jamshidi, A., Valley, J. K. Jr., Satcher, J. H. & Wu, M. C. Parallel trapping of multiwalled carbon nanotubes with optoelectronic tweezers. Appl. Phys. Lett. 95, 113104 (2009).

  17. 17.

    Lee, M.-W., Lin, Y.-H. & Lee, G.-B. Manipulation and patterning of carbon nanotubes utilizing optically induced dielectrophoretic forces. Microfluid. Nanofluidics 8, 609–617 (2010).

  18. 18.

    Jamshidi, A. et al. Dynamic manipulation and separation of individual semiconducting and metallic nanowires. Nat. Photonics 2, 86–89 (2008).

  19. 19.

    Hwang, H. & Park, J. K. Dynamic light-activated control of local chemical concentration in a fluid. Anal. Chem. 81, 5865–5870 (2009).

  20. 20.

    Suzurikawa, J., Nakao, M., Kanzaki, R. & Takahashi, H. Microscale pH gradient generation by electrolysis on a light-addressable planar electrode. Sens. Actuators B 149, 205–211 (2010).

  21. 21.

    Wang, F. et al. Exploring pulse-voltage-triggered optically induced electrohydrodynamic instability for femtolitre droplet generation. Appl. Phys. Lett. 104, 264103 (2014).

  22. 22.

    Hsu, H. Y. et al. Phototransistor-based optoelectronic tweezers for dynamic cell manipulation in cell culture media. Lab Chip 10, 165–172 (2010).

  23. 23.

    Wang, W., Lin, Y.-H., Wen, T.-C., Guo, T.-F. & Lee, G.-B. Selective manipulation of microparticles using polymer-based optically induced dielectrophoretic devices. Appl. Phys. Lett. 96, 113302 (2010).

  24. 24.

    Liu, N. et al. Extracellular-controlled breast cancer cell formation and growth using non-UV patterned hydrogels via optically-induced electrokinetics. Lab Chip 14, 1367–1376 (2014).

  25. 25.

    Choi, W., Kim, S. H., Jang, J. & Park, J. K. Lab-on-a-display: a new microparticle manipulation platform using a liquid crystal display (LCD). Microfluid. Nanofluidics 3, 217–225 (2007).

  26. 26.

    Hwang, H. et al. Interactive manipulation of blood cells using a lens-integrated liquid crystal display based optoelectronic tweezers system. Electrophoresis 29, 1203–1212 (2008).

  27. 27.

    Valley, J. K., Jamshidi, A., Ohta, A. T., Hsu, H. Y. & Wu, M. C. Operational regimes and physics present in optoelectronic tweezers. J. Micro Syst. 17, 342–350 (2008).

  28. 28.

    Hu, W. Q., Ishii, K. S. & Ohta, A. T. Micro-assembly using optically controlled bubble microrobots. Appl. Phys. Lett. 99, 094103 (2011).

  29. 29.

    Hu, W., Ishii, K. S., Fan, Q. & Ohta, A. T. Hydrogel microrobots actuated by optically generated vapour bubbles. Lab Chip 12, 3821–3826 (2012).

  30. 30.

    Seger-Sauli, U., Panayiotou, M., Schnydrig, S., Jordan, M. & Renaud, P. Temperature measurements in microfluidic systems: Heat dissipation of negative dielectrophoresis barriers. Electrophoresis 26, 2239–2246 (2005).

  31. 31.

    Das, S. K., Chung, S., Zervantonakis, I., Atnafu, J. & Kamm, R. D. A microfluidic platform for studying the effects of small temperature gradients in an incubator environment. Biomicrofluidics 2, 034106 (2008).

  32. 32.

    Lucchetta, E. M., Lee, J. H., Fu, L. A., Patel, N. H. & Ismagilov, R. F. Dynamics of Drosophila embryonic patterning network perturbed in space and time using microfluidics. Nature 434, 1134–1138 (2005).

  33. 33.

    Hsan-yin, H. et al. Thermo-sensitive microgels as in-situ sensor for temperature measurement in optoelectronic tweezers. 23rd IEEE International Conference on Micro Electro Mechanical Systems (MEMS), 1123–1126 (2010).

  34. 34.

    van Rijn, J., van den Berg, J., Souren, J. E. M., van Wijk, R. & Joenje, H. Hepatoma cells adapted to proliferate under normally lethal hyperthermic stress conditions show rapid decay of thermoresistance and heat shock protein synthesis when returned to 37°C. Int. J. Hyperth. 11, 697–708 (1995).

  35. 35.

    Jaeger, M. S., Mueller, T. & Schnelle, T. Thermometry in dielectrophoresis chips for contact-free cell handling. J. Phys. D. Appl. Phys. 40, 95 (2007).

  36. 36.

    Liang, W., Wang, S., Dong, Z., Lee, G.-B. & Li, W. J. Optical spectrum and electric field waveform dependent optically-induced dielectrophoretic (ODEP) micro-manipulation. Micromachines 3, 492 (2012).

  37. 37.

    Reichl, M. R. & Braun, D. Thermophoretic manipulation of molecules inside living cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 15955–15960 (2014).

  38. 38.

    Douglass, M. R. et al. Quantifying heat transfer in DMD-based optoelectronic tweezers with infrared thermography. Proc. SPIE 7596, 759609 (2010).

  39. 39.

    Darhuber, A. A., Valentino, J. P. & Troian, S. M. Planar digital nanoliter dispensing system based on thermocapillary actuation. Lab Chip 10, 1061–1071 (2010).

  40. 40.

    Kotz, K. T., Noble, K. A. & Faris, G. W. Optical microfluidics. Appl. Phys. Lett. 85, 2658–2660 (2004).

  41. 41.

    Ohta, A. T., Jamshidi, A., Valley, J. K., Hsu, H.-Y. & Wu, M. C. Optically actuated thermocapillary movement of gas bubbles on an absorbing substrate. Appl. Phys. Lett. 91, 074103 (2007).

  42. 42.

    Schaffer, E., Thurn-Albrecht, T., Russell, T. P. & Steiner, U. Electrically induced structure formation and pattern transfer. Nature 403, 874–877 (2000).

  43. 43.

    Park, S. Y., Kalim, S., Callahan, C., Teitell, M. A. & Chiou, E. P. A light-induced dielectrophoretic droplet manipulation platform. Lab Chip 9, 3228–3235 (2009).

  44. 44.

    Maltezos, G., Gomez, A., Zhong, J., Gomez, F. A. & Scherer, A. Microfluidic polymerase chain reaction. Appl. Phys. Lett. 93, 243901 (2008).

  45. 45.

    Ross, D. & Locascio, L. E. Microfluidic temperature gradient focusing. Anal. Chem. 74, 2556–2564 (2002).

  46. 46.

    Miralles, V., Huerre, A., Malloggi, F. & Jullien, M.-C. A review of heating and temperature control in microfluidic systems: techniques and applications. Diagnostics 3, 33–67 (2013).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was partially supported by the NSFC/RGC Joint Research Scheme (Project Nos. 51461165501 and CityU132/14), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Project Nos. 61522312, 61433017, and 61673278), the Shenzhen Science and Technology Innovation Commission Municipality (Project Nos. JCYJ20170818105431734 and JCYJ20150828104330541), the CAS FEA International Partnership Program for Creative Research Teams, and the Hong Kong Research Grants Council (Project Nos. CityU 116912, and 9041928).

Author information

W.J.L., L.L., and F.W. conceived the basic idea and designed the experiments. F.W. carried out the experiments and simulations. F.W. and W.J.L. analyzed the data and co-wrote the paper. W.J.L., L.L., G.Z., and Y.W. supervised the project. G.-B. L. provided OEK chips. G.L., P.L., and Y.W. assisted in the experimental processes. All authors contributed to the general discussion and revision of the manuscript.

Correspondence to Wen Jung Li.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, F., Liu, L., Li, G. et al. Thermometry of photosensitive and optically induced electrokinetics chips. Microsyst Nanoeng 4, 26 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41378-018-0029-y

Download citation