In modern optics, light can be described at different levels: as rays, as scalar waves, as vector fields, and as quantum fields. In the first three levels, there are singularities—characteristic features, useful in interpreting phenomena at that level. In geometrical optics, the singularities are ray caustics; in scalar wave optics, they are phase singularities (=wave dislocations= wave vortices = nodal manifolds); in vector waves, they are singularities where the polarisation of light is purely linear or purely circular. The singularities at each level are dissolved at the next level. Similar singularities occur in all waves, not just light.
Marking 50 years since the discovery, in collaboration with J.F. Nye, of phase singularities as a general phenomenon in wave physics.
Geometry dominates modern optics, in particular through understanding light in terms of its singularities. From this perspective, there are different levels of description in optics, each characterised by different singularities. Analogous considerations apply to other types of wave: quantum, acoustic, elastic, water…. In this review, three qualitatively different singularities will be described. The emphasis will be on singularites that are natural, in the sense that they are stable under perturbation; equivalent terms for this kind of naturalness are typicality, genericity, structural stability, and universality.
In geometrical optics (see the section ‘Rays’), the singularities are caustics: envelopes of families of rays. In scalar wave optics (see the section ‘Phase’), there are phase singularities, also called wave vortices, wavefront dislocations, and nodal lines (in 3D). In electromagnetic (i.e. vector) waves (see the section ‘Polarisation’), there are singularities of polarisation: lines (in 3D) on which waves are purely circularly polarised or purely linearly polarised.
This review includes some personal remarks.
The coarsest level is geometrical optics, in which light fields are described by families of rays. Here the singularities are caustics: focal lines and surfaces, that is, the envelopes of ray families, on which the intensity diverges; therefore caustics are the singularities of bright light. These singularities are classified by the mathematics of catastrophe theory1,2,3,4, providing a list of the geometric forms of caustics that are stable under generic perturbations.
Many phenomena are described by caustics: rainbows5; the bright lines of focused sunlight on the bottoms of swimming-pools; bright-edged shadows of floating insects6; twinkling starlight7,8 (whose statistics involve a competition between singularities9); mirages (the subject of an interesting misunderstanding10); unusual colours inside prisms11; beams that bend in free space12,13,14; and distorted images in curved mirrors15,16 and gravitational lensing17,18.
In wave optics, the caustic singularities of families of rays are smoothed by diffraction, which decorates them with rich and ubiquitous interference patterns19,20, described by a new class of special functions (‘diffraction catastrophes’21), represented by oscillatory integrals (chapter 36 of ref. 22 and refs. 23,24). The wave decorations exhibit interesting scaling laws, with implications for gravitational lensing25. In white light, caustics display interesting colours when diffraction is incorporated26,27.
Wave optics, when represented by complex scalar wavefunctions, introduces the additional concept of phase, which has its own singularities. Equivalent terms for phase singularities are optical vortices, nodal manifolds or wavefront dislocations28,29. On phase singularities, the light intensity is zero, so these are the singularities of dark light. Geometrically, they are lines in space, or points in the plane, around which the phase changes by a multiple of 2π (generically ±1) and the phase gradient vector circulates—hence the term optical vortices.
Phase singularities are complementary to caustics, not only because the former are dark (zero intensity) and the latter are bright (infinite intensity), but also in the sense of Niels Bohr: caustics are prominent features in the short-wave asymptotic regime, in which phase singularities are too close to be clearly resolved—because these are fine-scale features, clearly discernable only in the opposite case of high magnification, where caustics are smoothed out and so are no longer distinct features.
The darkness of a phase singularity can be regarded as perfect descructive interference30, underlying several interesting features. In white-light interference, universal colour patterns inhabit the near-darkness31,32. And because the phase changes by a multiple of 2π around a singularity, the local phase gradient vector rises to infinitely large values there. Therefore phase singularities are powerful sources of superoscillations (band-limited functions that vary faster than their fastest Fourier component)33, with many applications34,35, for example to sub-wavelength microscopy36,37,38,39 and in mathematics40. The optical applications of superoscillations depend on a fundamental fact: there is a diffraction limit for bright light, but there is no such limit for dark light (evoking the mathematician André Weil’s playful “…principle of anti-inteference, which would have light burst forth from two darknesses.”41).
Phase singularities can form intricate patterns, for example as fine detail in diffraction catastrophes19,20,42 and near spiral phase plates43,44. They can organise the coloured interference patterns formed by white light31,32,45. They occur in all types of quantum46,47,48,49,50,51,52 or classical (e.g. acoustic53 and tide54,55,56,57,58) waves and have been extensively reviewed59,60,61. In three dimensions, phase singularity lines can be linked and knotted62,63,64,65,66,67.
There has been a confusion in which wave vortices are regarded as inevitably associated with orbital angular momentum (OAM). The association holds for the simplest cases, e.g. optical beams that are eigenstates of OAM, but in general the concepts are distinct, as counterexamples demonstrate68. We are celebrating 30 years since the discovery of OAM as a practical resource in optics69. I remember L. Allen excitedly explaining OAM to me during a train journey in the early 1990s70.
Incorporating the vector (electromagnetic) nature of light brings further singularities, corresponding to the new physical property thus introduced, namely polarisation. In electromagnetic waves, the polarisation singularities that are stable under perturbations are lines in three dimensions. There are two types71,72,73,74,75: C singularities, on which the polarisation is purely circular, and L singularities, on which the polarisation is purely linear.
In direction space, polarisation singularities play a central role in crystal optics76,77,78,79,80,81 (notably conical refraction82,83), and in the pattern of polarised light in the blue sky84. The C and L lines are different for the electric and magnetic fields74, but coincide for paraxial fields85. In the presence of optical absorption (or gain) important singularities are the degeneracies of nonhermitian matrices86,87,88,89.
Polarisation singularities were discovered by J.F. Nye and his student J.V. Hajnal. Nye was an original scientist in several areas90; he was my only significant senior collaborator, with a positive influence on my scientific development, beginning with our paper on phase singularities28. Nye’s book29 is an excellent account of optical singularities, and an excellent complementary description is the book by Gbur91.
Historically, all three levels of singularity can be considered to have originated (in separate discoveries) in the same decade: the 1830s92.
As well as representing physics at each level, these optical and wave geometries illustrate the idea of asymptotically emergent phenomena93,94. The levels form a hierarchy, with each deeper level of theory eliminating the earlier singularities and generating new ones. Thus, the caustic singularities of ray theory are softened by scalar wave theory, enabling us to see the interference decorations, in the form of diffraction catastrophes. Interference fringes near caustics are not only brighter than elsewhere; they are also more widely separated—for smooth caustics, O(wavelength2/3) rather than O(wavelength). That is why our unaided eyes can see the wave features of light, vastly magnified in the sky, as the Airy supernumerary fringes decorating rainbows (ref. 5, and see the section ‘Rays’ of ref. 95). And the phase singularites introduced into scalar wave theory are themselves dissolved by the vector nature of light and replaced by the C and L polarisation singularities.
The hierarchy approach has predictive power, pointing towards the future of optical singularity theory. The phase singularities of scalar light can be regarded as windows, through which can be glimpsed the faint glimmering of the quantum vacuum (or, near acoustic vortices, the whispering of Brownian motion). Therefore phase singularities will have quantum cores96,97—a connection with quantum optics and, more fundamentally, quantum field theory, yet to be explored in detail. Related to this is the prediction of large momentum transfers to small particles98 located near phase singularities.
An extension of the hierarchy idea would be to regard polarisation singularites as windows to the deeper level of quantum optics; perhaps the counting statistics of photons emitted by excited atoms would be modified near C and L singularities. This too is unexplored territory. More fundamentally, one can speculate about possible new singularities in the quantum field theory of light; these would be windows down to a deeper and as yet unimagined level of our understanding of light, beyond quantum.
Arnold, V. I. Catastrophe Theory. 2nd edn. (Springer, Berlin, 1986).
Berry, M. V. & Upstill, C. IV catastrophe optics: morphologies of caustics and their diffraction patterns. Prog. Opt. 18, 257–346 (1980).
Berry, M. V. in Les Houches Lecture Series Session 453–543 (eds Balian, R., Kléman, M. & Poirier, J. P.) (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1981).
Berry, M. V. Waves and Thom’s theorem. Adv. Phys. 25, 1–26 (1976).
Lee, R. & Fraser, A. The Rainbow Bridge: Rainbows in Art, Myth, and Science. (Penn State University Press, Bellingham, 2001).
Berry, M. V. & Hajnal, J. V. The shadows of floating objects and dissipating vortices. Opt. Acta.: Int. J. Opt. 30, 23–40 (1983).
Berry, M. V. Focusing and twinkling: critical exponents from catastrophes in non-Gaussian random short waves. J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 10, 2061–2081 (1977).
Walker, J. G., Berry, M. V. & Upstill, C. Measurement of twinkling exponents of light focused by randomly rippling water. Opt. Acta.: Int. J. Opt. 30, 1001–1010 (1983).
Berry, M. V. Spectral twinkling. in Proc International School of Physics Enrico Fermi (eds. Casati, I. G. G. & Smilansky, U.) (Varenna: IOS Press, 2000).
Berry, M. V. Raman and the mirage revisited: confusions and a rediscovery. Eur. J. Phys. 34, 1423–1437 (2013).
Berry, M. V. Caustic of colors in Newton’s prism. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 39, C45–C50 (2022).
Berry, M. V. & Balazs, N. L. Nonspreading wave packets. Am. J. Phys. 4, 264–267 (1979).
Siviloglou, G. A. & Christodoulides, D. N. Accelerating finite energy Airy beams. Opt. Lett. 32, 979–981 (2007).
Berry, M. V. Stable and unstable Airy-related caustics and beams. J. Opt. 19, 055601 (2017).
Berry, M. V. Inflection reflection: images in mirrors whose curvature changes sign. Eur. J. Phys. 42, 065301 (2021).
Berry, M. V. Distorted mirror images organised by cuspoid and umbilic caustics. J. Opt. 23, 125402 (2021).
Berry, M. V. Disruption of images: the caustic-touching theorem. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 4, 561–569 (1987).
Berry, M. V. Looking at coalescing images and poorly resolved caustics. J. Opt. A: Pure Appl. Opt. 9, 649–657 (2007).
Berry, M. V., Nye, J. F. & Wright, F. J. The elliptic umbilic diffraction catastrophe. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A: Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 291, 453–484 (1979).
Nye, J. F. Dislocation lines in the hyperbolic umbilic diffraction catastrophe. Proc. R. Soc. A: Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 462, 2299–2313 (2006).
Trinkaus, H. & Drepper, F. On the analysis of diffraction catastrophes. J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 10, L11–L16 (1977).
DLMF. NIST Handbook of Mathematical Functions. http://dlmf.nist.gov (2010).
Duistermaat, J. J. Oscillatory integrals, lagrange immersions and unfolding of singularities. Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 27, 207–281 (1974).
Varchenko, A. N. Newton polyhedra and estimation of oscillating integrals. Funct. Anal. Its Appl. 10, 175–196 (1976).
Berry, M. V. Scalings for diffraction-decorated caustics in gravitational lensing. J. Opt. 23, 065604 (2021).
Berry, M. V. & Wilson, A. N. Black-and-white fringes and the colors of caustics. Appl. Opt. 33, 4714–4718 (1994).
Berry, M. V. & Klein, S. Colored diffraction catastrophes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 93, 2614–2619 (1996).
Nye, J. F. & Berry, M. V. Dislocations in wave trains. Proc. R. Soc. A: Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 336, 165–190 (1974).
Nye, J. F. Natural Focusing and Fine Structure of Light: Caustics and Wave Dislocations. (Institute of Physics Publishing, Bristol, 1999).
Berry, M. V. Optical currents. J. Opt. A: Pure Appl. Opt. 11, 094001 (2009).
Berry, M. V. Coloured phase singularities. N. J. Phys. 4, 66 (2002).
Berry, M. V. Exploring the colours of dark light. N. J. Phys. 4, 74 (2002).
Berry, M. V. in Quantum Coherence and Reality; In Celebration of the 60th Birthday of Yakir Aharonov (eds Anandan, J. S. & Safko, J. L.) 55–65 (World Scientific, Singapore, 1994).
Berry, M. V. et al. Roadmap on superoscillations. J. Opt. 21, 053002 (2019).
Zheludev, N. I. & Yuan, G. H. Optical superoscillation technologies beyond the diffraction limit. Nat. Rev. Phys. 4, 16–32 (2022).
Rogers, E. T. F. et al. A super-oscillatory lens optical microscope for subwavelength imaging. Nat. Mater. 11, 432–435 (2012).
Leiserson, I., Lipson, S. G. & Sarafis, V. Superresolution in far-field imaging. Opt. Lett. 25, 209–211 (2000).
Berry, M. V. Exact nonparaxial transmission of subwavelength detail using superoscillations. J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 46, 205203 (2013).
Liu, T. J. et al. Picophotonic localization metrology beyond thermal fluctuations. Nat. Mater. 22, 844–847 (2023).
Aharonov, Y. et al. The mathematics of superoscillations. Mem. Am. Math. Soc. 247, 1174 (2017).
Borel, A. et al. André Weil (1906–1998). Not. Am. Math. Soc. 46, 440–447 (1999).
Nye, J. F. Evolution from a Fraunhofer to a Pearcey diffraction pattern. J. Opt. A: Pure Appl. Opt. 5, 495–502 (2003).
Berry, M. V. Optical vortices evolving from helicoidal integer and fractional phase steps. J. Opt. A: Pure Appl. Opt. 6, 259–268 (2004).
Leach, J., Yao, E. & Padgett, M. J. Observation of the vortex structure of a non-integer vortex beam. N. J. Phys. 6, 71 (2004).
Leach, J. & Padgett, M. J. Observation of chromatic effects near a white-light vortex. N. J. Phys. 5, 154 (2003).
Riess, J. Nodal structure of Schroedinger wave functions and its physical significance. Ann. Phys. 57, 301–321 (1970).
Riess, J. Nodal structure, nodal flux fields, and flux quantization in stationary quantum states. Phys. Rev. D. 2, 647–653 (1970).
Riess, J. Quantized motion through rings in quantum mechanics. J. Phys. A 20, 5179–5188 (1987).
Hirschfelder, J. O., Christoph, A. C. & Palke, W. E. Quantum mechanical streamlines. I. Square potential barrier. J. Chem. Phys. 61, 5421–5425 (1974).
Hirschfelder, J. O., Goebel, C. J. & Bruch, L. W. Quantized vortices around wavefunction nodes. II. J. Chem. Phys. 61, 5456–5459 (1974).
Hirschfelder, J. O. & Tang, K. T. Quantum mechanical streamlines. III Idealized reactive atom-diatomic molecule collision. J. Chem. Phys. 64, 760–785 (1976).
Hirschfelder, J. O. & Tang, K. T. Quantum mechanical streamlines. IV. Collision of two spheres with square potential wells or barriers. J. Chem. Phys. 65, 470–486 (1976).
Wright, F. J. & Berry, M. V. Wave-front dislocations in the soundfield of a pulsed circular piston radiator. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 75, 733–748 (1984).
Berry, M. V. Geometry of phase and polarization singularities illustrated by edge diffraction and the tides. Proceedings of SPIE 4403, Second International Conference on Singular Optics (Optical Vortices): Fundamentals and Applications. (SPIE, Crimea, Ukraine, 2001).
Whewell, W. Essay towards a first approximation to a map of cotidal lines. Philos. Trans. 123, 147–236 (1833).
Whewell, W. X. V. I. I. Researches on the tides; sixth series. On the results of an extensive system of tide observations made on the coasts of Europe and America in June 1835. Philos. Trans. 126, 289–341 (1836).
Defant, A. Physical Oceanography. (Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1961).
Berry, M. V. Exuberant interference: rainbows, tides, edges, (de)coherence. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A: Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 360, 1023–1037 (2002).
Berry, M. V. Much ado about nothing: optical distortion lines (phase singularities, zeros, and vortices). Proceedings of SPIE 3487, International Conference on Singular Optics. (pp. 1–5. SPIE, Partenit, Ukraine, 1998).
Dennis, M. R., O’Holleran, K. & Padgett, M. J. Singular optics: optical vortices and polarization singularities. Prog. Opt. 53, 293–363 (2009).
Soskin, M. S. & Vasnetsov, M. V. Singular optics. Prog. Opt. 42, 219–276 (2001).
Berry, M. V. & Dennis, M. R. Knotted and linked phase singularities in monochromatic waves. Proc. R. Soc. A: Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 457, 2251–2263 (2001).
Berry, M. V. & Dennis, M. R. Knotting and unknotting of phase singularities: Helmholtz waves, paraxial waves and waves in 2+1 spacetime. J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 34, 8877–8888 (2001).
Berry, M. V. Knotted zeros in the quantum states of hydrogen. Found. Phys. 31, 659–667 (2001).
Dennis, M. R. Braided nodal lines in wave superpositions. N. J. Phys. 5, 134 (2003).
O’Holleran, K., Padgett, M. J. & Dennis, M. R. Topology of optical vortex lines formed by the interference of three, four, and five plane waves. Opt. Express 14, 3039–3044 (2006).
Leach, J. et al. Knotted threads of darkness. Nature 432, 165 (2004).
Berry, M. V. & Liu, W. No general relation between phase vortices and orbital angular momentum. J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 55, 374001 (2022).
Allen, L. et al. Orbital angular momentum of light and the transformation of Laguerre-Gaussian laser modes. Phys. Rev. A 45, 8185–8189 (1992).
Liu, W. Explorer of light, and more: an interview with Sir Michael Berry. Adv. Photonics 4, 010503 (2022).
Nye, J. F. & Hajnal, J. V. The wave structure of monochromatic electromagnetic radiation. Proc. R. Soc. A: Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 409, 21–36 (1987).
Hajnal, J. V. Singularities in the transverse fields of electromagnetic waves. I. Theory. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A: Math. Phys. Sci. 414, 433–446 (1987).
Hajnal, J. V. Singularities in the transverse fields of electromagnetic waves. II. Observations on the electric field. Proc. R. Soc. A: Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 414, 447–468 (1987).
Hajnal, J. V. Observations of singularities in the electric and magnetic fields of freely propagating microwaves. Proc. R. Soc. A: Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 430, 413–421 (1990).
Berry, M. V. Index formulae for singular lines of polarization. J. Opt. A: Pure Appl. Opt. 6, 675–678 (2004).
Berry, M. V. & Dennis, M. R. The optical singularities of birefringent dichroic chiral crystals. Proc. R. Soc. A: Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 459, 1261–1292 (2003).
Pancharatnam, S. The propagation of light in absorbing biaxial crystals - I. Theoretical. Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. - Sect. A 42, 86–109 (1955).
Pancharatnam, S. The propagation of light in absorbing biaxial crystals - II. Experimental. Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. - Sect. A 42, 235–248 (1955).
Berry, M. V. The optical singularities of bianisotropic crystals. Proc. R. Soc. A: Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 461, 2071–2098 (2005).
Berry, M., Bhandari, R. & Klein, S. Black plastic sandwiches demonstrating biaxial optical anisotropy. Eur. J. Phys. 20, 1–14 (1999).
Berry, M. V. & Dennis, M. R. Black polarization sandwiches are square roots of zero. J. Opt. A: Pure Appl. Opt. 6, S24–S25 (2004).
Berry, M. V. Conical diffraction asymptotics: fine structure of Poggendorff rings and axial spike. J. Opt. A: Pure Appl. Opt. 6, 289–300 (2004).
Berry, M. V. & Jeffrey, M. R. Conical diffraction: Hamilton’s diabolical point at the heart of crystal optics. Prog. Opt. 50, 13–50 (2007).
Berry, M. V., Dennis, M. R. & Lee, R. L. Jr Polarization singularities in the clear sky. N. J. Phys. 6, 162 (2004).
Berry, M. V. The electric and magnetic polarization singularities of paraxial waves. J. Opt. A: Pure Appl. Opt. 6, 475–481 (2004).
Pancharatnam, S. Light propagation in absorbing crystals possessing optical activity—electromagnetic theory. Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. - Sect. A 48, 227–244 (1958).
Berry, M. V. Pancharatnam, virtuoso of the Poincaré sphere: an appreciation. Curr. Sci. 67, 220–223 (1994).
Berry, M. V. Physics of nonhermitian degeneracies. Czechoslov. J. Phys. 54, 1039–1047 (2004).
Berry, M. V. Optical polarization evolution near a non-Hermitian degeneracy. J. Opt. 13, 115701 (2011).
Berry, M. John Frederick Nye. 26 February 1923–8 January 2019. Biogr. Mem. Fellows R. Soc. 69, 425–441 (2020).
Gbur, G. J. Singular Optics. (CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2017).
Berry, M. V. Making waves in physics. Three wave singularities from the miraculous 1830s. Nature 403, 21 (2000).
Berry, M. V. Asymptotics, singularities and the reduction of theories. Stud. Log. Found. Math. 134, 597–607 (1995).
Berry, M. V. Singular limits. Phys. Today 55, 10–11 (2002).
Berry, M. V. Nature’s optics and our understanding of light. Contemp. Phys. 56, 2–16 (2015).
Berry, M. V. & Dennis, M. R. Quantum cores of optical phase singularities. J. Opt. A: Pure Appl. Opt. 6, S178–S180 (2004).
Barnett, S. M. On the quantum core of an optical vortex. J. Mod. Opt. 55, 2279–2292 (2008).
Barnett, S. M. & Berry, M. V. Superweak momentum transfer near optical vortices. J. Opt. 15, 125701 (2013).
I thank Professor Wei Liu for his helpful comments. My research is supported by an Emeritus Fellowship from the Leverhulme Trust.
Conflict of interest
The author declares no competing interests.
About this article
Cite this article
Berry, M.V. The singularities of light: intensity, phase, polarisation. Light Sci Appl 12, 238 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41377-023-01270-8