# Spectral absorption control of femtosecond laser-treated metals and application in solar-thermal devices

## Abstract

Direct femtosecond (fs) laser processing is a maskless fabrication technique that can effectively modify the optical, electrical, mechanical, and tribological properties of materials for a wide range of potential applications. However, the eventual implementation of fs-laser-treated surfaces in actual devices remains challenging because it is difficult to precisely control the surface properties. Previous studies of the morphological control of fs-laser-processed surfaces mostly focused on enhancing the uniformity of periodic microstructures. Here, guided by the plasmon hybridisation model, we control the morphology of surface nanostructures to obtain more control over spectral light absorption. We experimentally demonstrate spectral control of a variety of metals [copper (Cu), aluminium (Al), steel and tungsten (W)], resulting in the creation of broadband light absorbers and selective solar absorbers (SSAs). For the first time, we demonstrate that fs-laser-produced surfaces can be used as high-temperature SSAs. We show that a tungsten selective solar absorber (W-SSA) exhibits excellent performance as a high-temperature solar receiver. When integrated into a solar thermoelectric generation (TEG) device, W-SSA provides a 130% increase in solar TEG efficiency compared to untreated W, which is commonly used as an intrinsic selective light absorber.

## Introduction

Direct femtosecond (fs) laser processing is a cost-effective, maskless and scalable fabrication technique that has been widely used to effectively modify the optical, electrical, mechanical and tribological properties of materials1,2,3. The creation of random structures by fs-laser pulses exhibits desirable features for material functionalisation, e.g., perfect light absorption, superhydrophobicity and superhydrophilicity, with many potential applications in biomedical, environmental, and energy fields1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8. However, the ability to design and engineer these properties is very limited as they originate from random structures with random sizes, geometries, and densities.

To provide more control over laser-induced surface structuring, past studies have mainly focused on structural regularity, mostly on the microscale. Of interest, one-dimensional (1D) femtosecond laser-induced periodic surface structures (fs-LIPSSs) with subwavelength periodicity that can be realised on a wide range of materials have attracted considerable attention1,2. Different techniques have been employed to address the spatial uniformity of fs-LIPSSs, for instance, positive and negative feedback mechanisms on titanium substrates9, chemical-assisted fs-laser-treatment10, high-uniformity fs-LIPSSs creation via temporally delayed multi-pulse irradiation11,12, non-ablative fs-laser structuring technique13, or self-organisation from metal-assisted pattern formation on glass14. While these studies showed the ability to produce more regular surface features, they did not demonstrate the ability to design the surface properties, which is crucial at the device engineering and application level.

In this work, we control the morphology of surface nanostructures guided by the plasmon resonance size effect and the plasmon hybridisation model15,16,17,18, which allows us to control the optical properties of fs-laser-treated metals. We show that the optical absorption of fs-laser-treated surfaces can be altered by tuning the size and density of randomly distributed nanostructures by considering the convolution of the hybridised plasmonic modes of the random structures. Since the particle size and density can be controlled by modifying the fs-laser processing parameters, we use the hybridisation model to guide our fabrication of fs-laser-treated light absorbers. As an application, we create selective solar absorbers (SSAs) and broadband absorbers (BBAs) on Al, Cu, steel, and W. We show that for solar-thermal applications, W-based SSA has the highest solar absorption efficiency. We compare the performance of untreated W (commonly used as a solar absorber) and fs-laser-treated W, as a receiver for a solar thermoelectric generator and show that W-SSA provides a 130% increase in the thermoelectric generation efficiency.

## Results

### Numerical analyses of hybridised metallic surface nanostructures

The goal of this work is to provide fabrication design tools to control the absorption spectral range of fs-laser-treated metallic substrates. For metallic surface structures with random sizes and distribution, the absorption spectral range depends on two main effects. First, the absorption of a nanostructure broadens and redshifts as a function of the nanoparticle size when the particle size exceeds the quasi-static approximation limit19,20. In addition, as the size and density of nanoparticles increase, their individual resonances hybridise due to the so-called plasmon hybridisation effect. The plasmon hybridisation model draws an analogy between surface plasmon coupling and hybridisation of atomic orbitals15,16,17,18, where coupled metallic (plasmonic) nanoantenna create bonding and antibonding modes that occur at lower and higher frequencies, respectively, compared to the original plasmon resonance18. The antibonding, high energy mode is a dark mode and cannot be easily excited directly by an external field18. The bonding mode is a bright mode that occurs at a lower energy and thus redshifts the measured plasmon resonance18. For an ensemble of metallic nanostructures, increasing the size and density of the nanostructures decreases the interparticle distance, hence increasing the hybridisation likelihood and strength21 (see Fig. 1a, b). Consequently, increasing the size and density of randomly distributed plasmonic nanostructures significantly broadens the convoluted plasmon resonances and redshifts the overall plasmon resonance17. Figure 1c shows the finite-difference time-domain calculation of the absorption for an individual W nanoparticle. Clearly, the plasmon resonance peak redshifts as the particle’s radius increases. Figure 1d shows the calculated absorption for four hybridised nanoparticles with a fixed radius of 100 nm. As the gap distance between the nanoparticles decreases, the plasmon resonance significantly redshifts. The resulting absorption spectrum of randomly distributed nanoparticles is a convolution of all the absorption bands corresponding to the different plasmon bonding states17,21. Because the plasmon resonance of most metals lies in the near-UV region (300–500 nm range), it is possible to create a plasmon-based selective solar absorber that covers the solar spectrum (~300–2500 nm) if we control the average interparticle distance using the relative size and density of the plasmonic nanostructures17 (see Supplementary information, Figs. S1 and S2 for more details on the absorption from hybridised W nanoparticles).

For fs-laser-treated surfaces, we obtain a distribution of nanoparticle sizes. According to our analyses shown in Fig. 1c, d, increasing the size and density of the nanoparticles will broaden the absorption spectral range due to excitation of higher order resonances and hybridisation between the excited resonances. Importantly, the size and density of randomly distributed surface structures depend on the number of pulses and laser fluence1,22. For a low pulse number and low fluence, the processed surfaces form nanostructures with lower density and smaller size, similar to the surface morphology shown in Fig. 1a. However, at a high pulse number and/or high fluence, the size and density of the formed nanostructures increases, similar to the surface morphology shown in Fig. 1b. Consequently, guided by the plasmon absorption and hybridisation theory, we can intelligently control the fs-laser fabrication parameters to control the hybridisation strength of the surface nanostructures and, as a result, the absorption spectral range.

### Creation of selective and broad band light absorbers with fs-laser ablation

Control over the absorption spectral range of surfaces is of major importance for a wide range of applications, such as selective solar absorbers, thermal emitters, structural colouring23,24, water condensation25 and daytime and night-time radiative cooling25. In particular, for a solar-thermal energy absorber operating at high temperature, the absorber should be an SSA since the main cooling mechanism is thermal radiation, and the light absorber temperature is given by $$T_{{\mathrm{absorber}}} \approx \left( {T_{{\mathrm{amb}}}^4 + \alpha _{{\mathrm{solar}}}I_{{\mathrm{solar}}}/\sigma \varepsilon _{{\mathrm{IR}}}} \right)^{1/4}$$, where Tabsorber and Tamb are the absorber and ambient temperatures, respectively, αsolar is the receiver’s solar absorptance, Isolar is the incident solar radiation, εIR is the blackbody emittance at the operation temperature, and σ is the Stefan-Boltzmann constant26. Accordingly, an ideal solar light absorber has nearly 100% absorbance within the solar spectrum and negligible thermal emittance within the blackbody radiation spectral range at mid-to-high temperatures (100–500 °C), i.e., an SSA. SSAs can thus maximise the temperature of solar absorbers and increase the efficiency of a heat engine driven by solar radiation. In past studies, several materials and structures have been introduced as SSAs, including intrinsic absorbers, e.g., tungsten26,27, semiconductor-metal tandems28,29, multilayer metal-dielectric interference stacks30, metal-dielectric composites31, surface textured metals32,33 and photonic crystals34, and metamaterial and plasmonic light absorbers35,36. Although many of these systems demonstrated high design flexibility for light absorption26,37, their stability at elevated temperatures necessary for solar-thermal energy conversion applications is highly questionable. In our study, we fabricate an SSA through our controlled fs-laser processing. More importantly, this is the first demonstration of a fs-laser-treated surface that is stable for high-temperature operation. We also demonstrate a high-temperature solar-thermoelectric generation (STEG) device with our SSA.

To create SSAs, we want to create a relatively narrow band absorber that selectively absorbs the solar spectrum (300–2500 nm). To do so, we need to limit the hybridisation between surface nanostructures by creating smaller nanostructures and lower density by using a lower laser fluence at higher scanning speeds, which effectively reduces the pulse numbers. In our experiment, lower fluence levels (0.3–0.5 J cm−2) and higher scanning speeds (1–1.5 mm s−1) are used to produce SSAs on Al, steel, Cu, and W. Conversely, to create broadband absorbers, we want to increase the hybridisation between surface nanostructures by producing larger nanostructures with a higher density. To do so, we used a set of higher fluence levels (1.5–3 J cm−2) and lower scanning speeds (0.1–0.5 mm s−1) for Al-BBA, Steel-BBA, Cu-BBA and W-BBA.

The spectral absorption/emission of fs-laser processed Al (Fig. 2a), steel (Fig. 2b) and Cu (Fig. 2c) over the visible, NIR and mid-IR ranges is shown. For each metal, we used two laser processing parameters to create a BBA (blue lines) and an SSA (red lines). The fluence used for Al-BBA was 1.5 J cm−2, and 3 J cm−2 was used for Cu-BBA and Steel-BBA. The scanning speed used for Al-BBA was 0.5 mm s−1, and 0.1 mm s−1 was used for Cu-BBA and Steel-BBA. The scanning speed used for Al-SSA was 1.5 mm s−1, and 1 mm s−1 was used for Cu-SSA and Steel-SSA. The fluence for Al-SSA was 0.30 J cm−2, and 0.50 J cm−2 was used for Cu-SSA and Steel-SSA. Figure 2d, e show scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of Cu-SSA and Cu-BBA, respectively, which clearly validate the hybridisation model predictions. The insets of Fig. 2d, e shows the low-magnification views of Cu-SSA and Cu-BBA. The average particle size of Cu-SSA is ~0.058 µm, while the average particle size of Cu-BBA is ~1.13 µm. The structure dimensions were determined using ImageJ by considering a 10 × 10 μm2 region from an SEM image (see material and methods for details). Using ImageJ, we obtained a histogram of the size distribution of the formed random structures and obtained the average particle size, as shown in Fig. 2f and Fig. 2g, for Cu-SSA and Cu-BBA, respectively. We note here that we are only interested in the particle dimensions in the horizontal plane and not the out-of-plane dimension since the resonances are excited with a normally incident light with horizontal polarisation.

To quantify the performance of the fabricated light absorbers, we first analyse the absorptivity and emissivity of different metals. The spectrally averaged absorptivity $$(\bar \alpha )$$ of the selective surface is given by37:

$$\bar \alpha = \frac{1}{I}\mathop {\int}\limits_0^\infty {{\mathrm{d}}\lambda \varepsilon (\lambda )\frac{{{\mathrm{d}}I}}{{{\mathrm{d}}\lambda }}}$$
(1)

The emissivity $$(\bar \varepsilon )$$ is given by:

$$\bar \varepsilon = \frac{{\mathop {\int}\limits_0^\infty {{\mathrm{d}}\lambda \varepsilon (\lambda )/\{ \lambda ^5[\exp (hc/\lambda kT) - 1]\} } }}{{\mathop {\int}\limits_0^\infty {{\mathrm{d}}\lambda /\{ \lambda ^5[\exp (hc/\lambda kT) - 1]\} } }}$$
(2)

where I is the solar intensity, λ is the wavelength, ε(λ) is the spectral emissivity of the selective absorber/emitter, $$\frac{{{\mathrm{d}}I}}{{{\mathrm{d}}\lambda }}$$ is the spectral light intensity, which corresponds to the air-mass coefficient (AM) 1.5 solar spectrum, h is Plank’s constant, c is the speed of light, k is the Boltzmann constant, and T is the absorber temperature, here, taken as 200 °C. The solar absorber efficiency ηabs at a given operating temperature for the solar absorber $$T_{{\mathrm{abs}}}^4$$, and solar concentration C, assuming only radiative losses is given by:

$$\eta _{{\mathrm{abs}}} = \bar \alpha - \frac{{\bar \varepsilon \sigma (T_{{\mathrm{abs}}}^4 - T_{{\mathrm{amb}}}^4)}}{{CI_{{\mathrm{solar}}}}}$$
(3)

where Isolar is the solar intensity and is ~1000 W m−2.

The calculated solar absorptance and emissivity for the BBA and SSA absorbers at T = 200 °C, as well as the corresponding ηabs in percentage for C = 1, are shown in Table 1.

Although SSAs consistently have lower $$\bar \alpha$$, they have higher ηabs. One of the by-products of fs-laser processing of metals is the formation of metal oxides, which limits the possibility of having low $$\bar \varepsilon$$, even after optimising the laser processing parameters. While it is possible to control the absorption spectral range of Al, a strong absorption peak is produced for wavelengths >8 µm due to the phonon-polariton absorption of the formed Al2O3. On the other hand, stainless steel forms broad absorption with limited control over its spectral range, and it is difficult to create an SSA using steel. This is likely due to the nonzero extinction coefficient of iron oxides (Fe3O4 and Fe2O3) over the entire visible, NIR, and IR ranges (see Supplementary information, Fig. S3). Only Cu produces a positive ηabs; i.e., it is the only metal capable of reaching temperatures higher than the operating temperature (T = 200 °C) by only absorbing incident solar radiation at C = 1 if cooling is solely due to thermal radiation. Cu, however, can form oxides that have negligible absorption over the wavelength ranges of interest38. Therefore, Cu is not a proper choice for high-temperature applications due to its low oxidation temperature39 and relatively low melting point (~1000 °C), which could be reduced even further when considering that the absorption in fs-laser-treated metals is due to nanostructures40, that have a lower melting point than their bulk counterpart41.

W was selected as the best candidate for high-temperature SSA since it has a high melting point (3422 °C) and mechanical strength42. We show control over the absorption spectral range by controlling the hybridisation of the formed W nanostructures. Figure 3a shows the measured spectral absorption/emission of broadband (black line) and selective (blue line) W absorbers. The broadband W has a solar absorptance of ~0.88 and emissivity of ~0.82 with ηabs(BB) ~ −111% at T = 200 °C (see Table 1). On the other hand, the W-SSA solar absorptance is ~0.92 and the emissivity is ~0.18 with ηabs SSA ~ 45% at T = 200 °C (Table 1). The results shown in Fig. 3a represent two cases of a highly selective solar absorber and an ultrabroadband light absorber. In the supplementary materials, we show that as we vary the laser fluence, we can tune the structure sizes, which tunes the absorption/emission properties of the W surface (Fig. S4), agreeing with the plasmon hybridisation model shown based on the particle distribution in Fig. S5.

Figure 3b shows SEM images of the fs-laser-treated W with a fluence of 0.30 J cm−2 and scanning speed of 1 mm s−1. The formed periodic line gratings are nanostructure-covered fs-LIPSSs. The formed nanostructure-covered fs-LIPSSs are frequently reported on a wide range of materials and are formed in a direction perpendicular to the polarisation of the incident beam with a period on the order of the incident wavelength1,2. It is important to note that although fs-LIPSSs can act as a 1D grating that excites surface waves, the measured absorption is not due to fs-LIPSSs, but is due to the nanostructures formed on top and in-between fs-LIPSSs. This is because light absorption via exciting surface plasmons (SPPs) with a grating is limited to the grating diffraction orders that satisfy the phase matching condition of the SPPs. For the formed grating, the period is ~530 nm, and the phase matching condition is not satisfied for W at any wavelength, as we show in the supplementary information, Fig. S6. Figure 3c, d show SEM images of W-BBA created at a fluence of 3 J cm−2 and a scanning speed of 0.1 mm s−1, where clusters of large surface structures are formed, which lead to a broader absorption spectrum according to the hybridisation model.

### High-temperature operation of fs-laser-treated SSA

Although durable and selective, W and other metals can react and form oxides and nitrides at high temperatures if they are placed in an ambient environment. In our experiments, we noticed that the fs-laser-induced light absorption disappears when we heat the metallic light absorber. This is because the surface plasmonic nanostructures, responsible for the observed absorption, turn into oxides at higher temperatures, as shown in Fig. 4a. Since the absorption is due to the excitation of plasmonic resonances, converting a metal to an oxide destroys the surface absorption. To ensure that W survives high temperatures, we deposit a 200-nm-thick TiO2 thin film by electron beam evaporation (~0.1 nm s−1). By adding a protective oxide layer, the surface nanostructures are no longer exposed to oxygen and retain their metallic properties even at elevated temperatures, as shown schematically in Fig. 4a. We choose TiO2, as opposed to Al2O3 or SiO2, as it has low spectral emission for wavelengths <10 µm, i.e., away from the blackbody radiation wavelength range of interest.

To test the performance of TiO2-coated W at high temperatures, we annealed TiO2-coated W and uncoated W-SSA at 500 °C for ten minutes. As shown in Fig. 4b, the TiO2-coated W-SSA survived the annealing process, while the uncoated W-SSA lost its absorption properties. By performing energy-dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) on uncoated W before (Fig. 4c) and after (Fig. 4d) annealing, we can see that an oxide peak appears post-annealing. A cross-sectional SEM image of W-SSA shows the deposited TiO2 film (see Supplementary information, Fig. S7). We note that the disappearance of the strong light absorption associated with the surface structures indicates that light trapping effects do not contribute significantly to the observed light absorption. This is because after annealing, the formed structures persist (see Supplementary information, Fig. S8), while the measured absorption is similar to that of an untreated surface. Because the absorption is due to plasmonic resonances, the absorption disappears when the metallic surface structures oxidise.

### Solar thermoelectric generation using fs-laser-treated W

To present a practical device application of our plasmon hybridisation-based fabrication method, we tested the TEG efficiency of three thermoelectric generators with a solar thermal receiver consisting of W-SSA, W-BBA and untreated-W. We note that W is used as an SSA since it has good absorption within the solar spectrum and low emissivity in the blackbody radiation range. As shown schematically in Fig. 5a, to obtain high temperatures, we used an optical concentration of C = 40. The maximum temperatures reached by the untreated W, W-BBA, and W-SSA were 118 °C, 155 °C and 178 °C, respectively. We note that due to the HVAC system in the lab, the forced convection current leads to a high convection coefficient, which can reach up to 200 $${\mathrm{Wm}}^{ - 2}{\mathrm{K}}^{ - 1}$$. Figure 5b shows the measured STEG output power vs. the current for the three systems. The maximum output power of W-SSA is ~130% and 15% higher than that of untreated W and W-BBA.

## Discussion

In conclusion, we used the plasmon hybridisation model to explain the absorption spectral range of fs-laser-treated metals. We were able to control the surface morphology by adjusting the fs-laser parameters to create selective solar light absorbers and broadband light absorbers on different metals. We showed that metals with oxides that do not absorb significantly in the blackbody radiation wavelength range, e.g., Cu and W, are excellent candidates for selective solar absorption. We further investigated the performance of the fs-laser-treated SSAs at high temperatures and showed that W provides the best performance. To have fs-laser-treated W operate as a high-temperature SSA in ambient environments, the W surface must be sealed with a dielectric thin film. We chose TiO2 as it has limited absorption within the blackbody radiation wavelength range of interest. W absorbers coated with TiO2 were shown to withstand annealing at 500 °C without any noticeable degradation in their absorption properties. We showed that the maximum power output is obtained from a thermoelectric generator using W-SSA as the solar receiver, which improved the output power efficiency by ~130% compared to using untreated W as the solar receiver. For the first time, we produce fs-laser-treated surfaces that can act as high-temperature absorbers for enhanced thermoelectric generation efficiency.

## Materials and methods

### Laser fabrication setup

The laser used in our experiments is a Ti: sapphire fs-laser amplifier, which delivers horizontally polarised pulse trains at a repetition rate of 1 kHz with a central wavelength of λ = 800 nm and a pulse duration of τ = 30 fs. The maximum pulse energy delivered by the laser system is 7 mJ. The laser was focused by a lens with a focal length of 20 cm and incident at normal incidence. Bulk circular disks of W, Al, Cu and stainless steel (obtained from Alfa-Aesar with 99.99% purity) were used as target materials due to their high mechanical strength at high temperatures. The samples were mounted on a computerised XYZ precision stage and translated at different speeds for broadband and selective absorbers.

### Simulations

The simulations were performed using commercially available finite-difference time-domain software from Lumerical®. For all simulations, we calculated the absorption inside W nanoparticles as a function of the particle size (Fig. 1c), or the gap distance (Fig. 1d, Figs. S1 and S2).

### Determination of particle radii from SEM images

In our work, we are interested in resonances occurring due to the excitation of dipoles oscillating parallel to the surface, i.e., the x–y plane. To obtain the dimensions in the x–y plane of the nanoparticles, we used ImageJ, which is conventionally used to measure particle dimensions. We first select an evenly illuminated region from the SEM surface image and then apply a bandpass filter to flatten the image. Afterwards, we apply a threshold to the image by adjusting the background and outline the particles. After obtaining the area distribution of the outlined particles, we can directly calculate the particle radius distribution.

### Physical vapour deposition of TiO2

To create an SSA that operates at high temperature, a 200 nm TiO2 film is deposited by an electron beam evaporator on the processed metals. As discussed above, the TiO2 film acts as a protective layer against oxidation of the surface nanostructures, which destroys the absorption properties of the ablated surfaces. TiO2 pellets were purchased from Kurt J. Lesker® with 99.9% purity and evaporated via electron beam evaporation at 0.1 nm sec−1.

### Annealing

To check the stability of the solar absorber, we annealed the samples in an oven at 500 °C for ten minutes.

### Spectral and surface characterisation

To characterise the spectral reflectance/scattering, we measured the total hemispherical optical reflection of the samples using an ultraviolet-visible (UV) PerkinElmer Lambda 900 spectrophotometer and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), Bruker IFS 66/S FTIR spectrometer, each equipped with an integrating sphere. The surface morphology was analysed by SEM, and EDS was performed to study the presence of oxides and nitrides. Ion-beam milling was utilised for the cross-sectional view of the oxide layer.

### TEG measurements

Commercial Bi-Te-based TEGs with a size of 18 × 21 mm were purchased from TEGprotm (module of TE-MOD-1W2V-21S). Bi-Te-based TEG power modules can operate at temperatures as high as 230 °C continuously. A solar simulator with an AM 1.5 airmass filter was used. A plano-convex lens with a 250 mm focal length and 150 mm diameter was mounted at the output port of the solar simulator to enhance the optical concentration. Power was measured using a Keithley-2400 source metre by using an open circuit voltage and sweeping the voltage down to 0 while measuring the current. The receiver temperature was monitored using a thermocouple.

## References

1. 1.

Vorobyev, A. Y. & Guo, C. L. Direct femtosecond laser surface nano/microstructuring and its applications. Laser Photonics Rev. 7, 385–407 (2013).

2. 2.

Bonse, J. et al. Laser-induced periodic surface structures-a scientific evergreen. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 23, 9000615 (2017).

3. 3.

Cheng, J. et al. A review of ultrafast laser materials micromachining. Opt. Laser Technol. 46, 88–102 (2013).

4. 4.

Baldacchini, T. et al. Superhydrophobic surfaces prepared by microstructuring of silicon using a femtosecond laser. Langmuir 22, 4917–4919 (2006).

5. 5.

Vorobyev, A. Y. & Guo, C. L. Multifunctional surfaces produced by femtosecond laser pulses. J. Appl. Phys. 117, 033103 (2015).

6. 6.

Vorobyev, A. Y. & Guo, C. L. Metal pumps liquid uphill. Appl. Phys. Lett. 94, 224102 (2009).

7. 7.

Vorobyev, A. Y. & Guo, C. L. Colorizing metals with femtosecond laser pulses. Appl. Phys. Lett. 92, 041914 (2008).

8. 8.

Vorobyev, A. Y. & Guo, C. L. Femtosecond laser blackening of platinum. J. Appl. Phys. 104, 053516 (2008).

9. 9.

Öktem, B. et al. Nonlinear laser lithography for indefinitely large-area nanostructuring with femtosecond pulses. Nat. Photonics 7, 897–901 (2013).

10. 10.

Huang, J. et al. Fabrication of highly homogeneous and controllable nanogratings on silicon via chemical etching-assisted femtosecond laser modification. Nanophotonics 8, 869–878 (2019).

11. 11.

He, W., Yang, J. & Guo, C. L. Controlling periodic ripple microstructure formation on 4H-SiC crystal with three time-delayed femtosecond laser beams of different linear polarizations. Opt. Exp. 25, 5156 (2017).

12. 12.

Jalil, S. A. et al. Maskless formation of uniform subwavelength periodic surface structures by double temporally-delayed femtosecond laser beams. Appl. Surf. Sci. 471, 516–520 (2019).

13. 13.

Huang, J. et al. Cylindrically focused nonablative femtosecond laser processing of long-range uniform periodic surface structures with tunable diffraction efficiency. Adv. Optical Mater. 7, 1900706 (2019).

14. 14.

He, Y. Z. et al. Maskless laser nano-lithography of glass through sequential activation of multi-threshold ablation. Appl. Phys. Lett. 114, 133107 (2019).

15. 15.

Xu, H. X. et al. Electromagnetic contributions to single-molecule sensitivity in surface-enhanced Raman scattering. Phys. Rev. E 62, 4318 (2000).

16. 16.

El Kabbash, M. et al. Plasmon-exciton resonant energy transfer: across scales hybrid systems. J. Nanomaterials 2016, 4819040 (2016).

17. 17.

ElKabbash, M. et al. Tunable black gold: controlling the near‐field coupling of immobilized au nanoparticles embedded in mesoporous silica capsules. Adv. Optical Mater. 5, 1700617 (2017).

18. 18.

Prodan, E. et al. A hybridization model for the plasmon response of complex nanostructures. Science 302, 419–422 (2003).

19. 19.

Amendola, V. et al. Surface plasmon resonance in gold nanoparticles: a review. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 29, 203002 (2017).

20. 20.

Maier, S. A. Plasmonics: fundamentals and applications. (New York: Springer, 2007).

21. 21.

Nordlander, P. et al. Plasmon hybridization in nanoparticle dimers. Nano Lett. 4, 899–903 (2004).

22. 22.

Fang, R. R., Vorobyev, A. & Guo, C. L. Direct visualization of the complete evolution of femtosecond laser-induced surface structural dynamics of metals. Light.: Sci. Appl. 6, e16256 (2017).

23. 23.

ElKabbash, M. et al. Iridescence-free and narrowband perfect light absorption in critically coupled metal high-index dielectric cavities. Opt. Lett. 42, 3598–3601 (2017).

24. 24.

Letsou, T., ElKabbash, M., Iram, S., Hinczewski, M. & Strangi, G. Heat-induced perfect light absorption in thin-film metasurfaces for structural coloring [Invited]. Optical Mater. Express 9, 1386–1393 (2019).

25. 25.

Zhou, M. et al. Accelerating vapor condensation with daytime radiative cooling. In Proc. SPIE 11121. New Concepts in Solar and Thermal Radiation Conversion II. 1112107 (San Diego, California, United States, 2019).

26. 26.

Bermel, P. et al. Selective solar absorbers. Annu. Rev. Heat. Transf. 15, 231–254 (2012).

27. 27.

Suman, S., Khan, M. K. & Pathak, M. Performance enhancement of solar collectors—A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 49, 192–210 (2015).

28. 28.

Seraphin, B. O. Chemical vapor deposition of thin semiconductor films for solar energy conversion. Thin Solid Films 39, 87–94 (1976).

29. 29.

Agnihotri, O. P. & Gupta, B. K. Solar Selective Surfaces. p. 232 (New York: Wiley-Interscience, 1981).

30. 30.

Lampert, C. M. Coatings for enhanced photothermal energy collection I. Selective absorbers. Sol. Energy Mater. 1, 319–341 (1979).

31. 31.

Cao, F. et al. A review of cermet-based spectrally selective solar absorbers. Energy Environ. Sci. 7, 1615–1627 (2014).

32. 32.

Huang, M. H. et al. Room-temperature ultraviolet nanowire nanolasers. Science 292, 1897–1899 (2001).

33. 33.

Zhu, J. et al. Optical absorption enhancement in amorphous silicon nanowire and nanocone arrays. Nano Lett. 9, 279–282 (2009).

34. 34.

Lin, S. Y., Moreno, J. & Fleming, J. G. Three-dimensional photonic-crystal emitter for thermal photovoltaic power generation. Appl. Phys. Lett. 83, 380–382 (2003).

35. 35.

Hedayati, M. K. et al. Design of a perfect black absorber at visible frequencies using plasmonic metamaterials. Adv. Mater. 23, 5410–5414 (2011).

36. 36.

Fan, S. H. Thermal photonics and energy applications. Joule 1, 264–273 (2017).

37. 37.

Kennedy, C. E. Review of Mid-to High-Temperature Solar Selective Absorber Materials. No. NREL/TP-520-31267. (National Renewable Energy Laboratory, United States, 2002).

38. 38.

Querry, M. R. Optical Constants, Contractor Report. (CRDC, 1986).

39. 39.

Lee, S. K., Hsu, H. C. & Tuan, W. H. Oxidation behavior of copper at a temperature below 300 °C and the methodology for passivation. Mater. Res. 19, 51–56 (2016).

40. 40.

Garcell, E. M. & Guo, C. L. Colorful multifunctional surfaces produced by femtosecond laser pulses. Optical Mater. Express 9, 1033–1040 (2019).

41. 41.

Mei, Q. S. & Lu, K. Melting and superheating of crystalline solids: from bulk to nanocrystals. Prog. Mater. Sci. 52, 1175–1262 (2007).

42. 42.

Zhang, Y. M., Evans, J. R. G. & Yang, S. F. Corrected values for boiling points and enthalpies of vaporization of elements in handbooks. J. Chem. Eng. Data 56, 328–337 (2011).

Download references

## Acknowledgements

This work was supported by grants from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (OPP1157723), the US Army Research Office (W911NF-15–1–0319), and the National Science Foundation (1701163 & 1722169).

## Author information

M.E. and C.G. discussed and designed the project. S.A.J., B.L. and E.M.G. performed the laser fabrication. S.A.J. and B.L. characterised the samples and measurements. M.E. and J.Z. performed theoretical calculations and simulations. S.A.J., M.E., B.L. and C.G. performed the data analyses. S.A.J., S.S. and M.E. performed the TEG performance tests. S.A.J., M.E., and C.G. wrote the paper and SI. All the authors commented on the paper.

Correspondence to Mohamed ElKabbash or Chunlei Guo.

## Ethics declarations

### Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

## Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

## About this article

### Cite this article

Jalil, S.A., Lai, B., ElKabbash, M. et al. Spectral absorption control of femtosecond laser-treated metals and application in solar-thermal devices. Light Sci Appl 9, 14 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41377-020-0242-y

Download citation

• Received:

• Revised:

• Accepted:

• Published: