Abstract
Current therapy for myelofibrosis (MF) results in a limited prolongation of patient survival. In order to improve treatment outcomes, we developed a strategy to effectively deplete MF hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells (HSPCs). In the present study, an imipridone, ONC201, was combined with RG7112, an antagonist of MDM2, a p53 negative regulator, to activate downstream events of the p53 and TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL)/death receptor (DR) pathways. As compared to treatment with the individual drugs, the combination of ONC201 and RG7112 promoted greater degrees of apoptosis of MF CD34+ cells through activation of both p53-dependent and -independent pathways. Importantly, treatment with ONC201-RG7112 not only decreased the number of JAK2V617F+ and calreticulin mutated colonies assayed from MF CD34+ cells, but allowed for the persistence or appearance of JAK2 wild type colonies. Treatment with ONC201 combined with RG7112 could be a potentially effective strategy for treating MF patients.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Myelofibrosis (MF), a myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN), arises at the level of hematopoietic stem progenitor cells (HSPCs) due to a series of mutational events that result in activation of JAK/STAT signaling [1, 2]. The driver mutations associated with MF involve JAK2, calreticulin (CALR), and the thrombopoietin receptor, MPL [1, 3,4,5]. Additional mutations can accompany these driver mutations including epigenetic modifiers (DNMT3A, TET2, and ASXL1), splicing factors (SF3B1, SRSF2, and U2AF1), metabolic enzymes (IDH1, IDH2), and tumor suppressors (TP53) which are associated with an inferior survival of MF patients [6,7,8]. JAK/STAT signaling has served as the primary target for MPN specific drug development and has led to the approval of two small-molecule JAK2 inhibitors, ruxolitinib and fedratinib [2, 9, 10]. JAK2 inhibitor therapy for patients with advanced forms of MF results in a reduction in the degree of splenomegaly and improvement in the systemic symptoms but does not prevent disease progression and only modestly prolongs overall survival [11,12,13,14].
Increased expression of MDM2, a negative regulator of p53, has been observed in MPN CD34+ HSPCs [15]. Nakatake et al demonstrated that JAK2V617F alters p53 responses to DNA damage by up-regulating the La-antigen which increases MDM2 protein translation [16]. We have shown that MDM2 antagonists termed nutlins can selectively eliminate MPN CD34+ cells by activating the p53 pathway [17,18,19]. We have also reported a phase 1 trial of the oral nutlin, RG7388 (idasanutlin), in polycythemia vera (PV) patients intolerant or refractory to hydroxyurea or interferon therapy, which resulted in hematological responses, reduction in the degree of splenomegaly, an improvement in symptoms and a reduction in the JAK2V617F variant allele frequency (VAF) [20]. Additional trials of MDM2 antagonists in MF patients have led to reductions in spleen size, improvement of systemic symptoms, and reduction in the VAF of MPN driver mutations (NCT04097821, NCT04485260, NCT04640532). Resistance to MDM2 inhibitors has been evaluated in solid tumor cell lines and has been attributed to either the emergence of de novo TP53 mutations or the selection of TP53 mutated clones [21, 22]. We have recently observed that nutlin treatment of PV patients was associated with the transient increase in the VAF of TP53 mutations that were present prior to initiation of nutlin therapy. Fortunately, the appearance of these TP53 mutations diminished with discontinuation of nutlin therapy and was not associated with drug resistance or progression to MF or MPN-blast phase (BP) [23].
Since the chronic administration of idasanutlin in PV, leukemia, and solid tumor patients has been limited due to gastrointestinal toxicity [20, 24,25,26], we have searched for alternative drugs which target different pathways to partner with a nutlin with the goal of developing a more effective and tolerable stem cell depleting therapy for MF patients.
Oral imipridone, ONC201, triggers apoptosis by activating the extrinsic apoptosis pathway [27,28,29,30]. It transcriptionally induces TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) which binds to members of the TNF-alpha receptor super-family, including the death receptors 4 and 5 (DR4 and DR5), thereby inducing apoptosis through activation of caspase-8 [31]. Recent studies have shown that ONC201 increases TRAIL, DR4, and DR5 at both the transcriptional and translational levels by inactivating the AKT/ERK pathways and leading to upregulation and translocation of Foxo3a into the nucleus where it binds to the TRAIL promoter to upregulate gene transcription [30, 32, 33]. The actions of ONC201 on malignant cells are known to be independent of p53 [32, 34].
ONC201 has also been shown to be a potent allosteric agonist of the ATP-dependent mitochondrial caseinolytic protease P (ClpP), which regulates oxidative phosphorylation by controlling the degradation of the respiratory chain components and triggering the mitochondrial unfolded protein response [35, 36]. Hyper-activation of ClpP by ONC201 increases mitochondrial proteolysis and leads to mitochondrial dysfunction, impaired oxidative phosphorylation, and death of acute myeloid leukemia cells [37,38,39]. The effects of ONC201 on AML cells are thought to be through its actions on ClpP rather than the TRAIL/DR pathway. Ishizawa and Geer have shown that ONC201 induces the atypical integrated stress response (ISR) in various types of malignant cells by activating transcription factor 4 (ATF4) [34, 37]. Deleting ATF4, or inhibiting events upstream of the ISR, blocks the induction of ATF4-target genes thereby limiting the effects of ONC201. Whether ONC201 affects MF HSPC ClpP has not been previously explored.
TP53 is also known to induce the expression of TRAIL, DR4, and DR5 [40], we then hypothesized that the effects of ONC201 on the extrinsic apoptosis pathway and mitochondrial function would be complementary with the consequences of upregulation of p53 achieved. We evaluated if a combination of a nutlin and ONC201 might prove to be an effective therapeutic strategy to selectively induce apoptosis of malignant MF CD34+ cells.
Materials and methods
Specimen collection and cell preparation
Primary samples were collected from 21 individual MF patients after written informed consent was obtained according to guidelines established by the Institutional Review Board of the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (ISMMS). The study was conducted in accordance with the Principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. All patients met the World Health Organization criteria for the diagnosis of MF [41, 42]. Patient characteristics are provided in Supplemental Table 1. Normal donor (ND) human bone marrow (BM) was purchased from AllCells (Emeryville, CA). The experiments in which the CD34+ cells from each of the patients were studied are itemized in Supplemental Table 2.
Flow cytometry assays
Cells were collected and washed in MACS buffer twice and then stained with the designated antibodies directly for at least 15 min prior to further analysis. Data were acquired on a FACS Calibur analyzer (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ).
Isolation of RNA and qRT-PCR
Total RNA was extracted from treated CD34+ cells using an RNeasy kit (QIAGEN, Valencia, CA). Complementary DNA was reverse transcribed using the EcoDry Premix kit (Clontech Laboratories, Mountain View, C.A.). The targeting transcripts were evaluated by quantitative reverse-transcription (qRT)-PCR.
Activation of TP53 transcript in CD34+ cells
MF CD34+ cells were transiently transfected with either control CRISPR/dCas9 activation plasmid or p53 CRISPR/Cas9 activation plasmid using Amaxa Human CD34+ cell nucleofector kit (Lonza, Alpharetta, GA). Control CRISPR activation plasmid and human p53 CRISPR activation plasmid were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Dallas, TX).
Western blot analysis
MF CD34+ cells were harvested after being treated with either each drug alone or in combination, and whole-cell protein extracts were prepared with RIPA lysis buffer (Boston BioProducts, Worcester, MA) containing a protease inhibitor cocktail (Thermo Fisher Scientific) for western blotting.
Hematopoietic progenitor cell proliferation assays
HSPCs were assayed in semisolid media as described previously [18]. The hematopoietic colonies were enumerated after 14 days of incubation with or without drugs. The individual colonies were plucked and genotyped for JAK2V617F [15].
Nested allele-specific polymerase chain reaction for JAK2V617F
Genomic DNA was isolated from randomly plucked colonies and JAK2V617F was detected by using a nested allele-specific PCR.
Statistical analysis
Results were reported as the mean ± standard deviation. A two-sided Student’s t-test was used for quantitative assays. For two-group comparisons, non-parametric Wilcoxon Rank Sum Tests were used to assess differences in distributions of quantitative variables. Statistical significance was established at P < 0.05.
Additional details regarding reagents, patient samples, experimental methods are found in the online Supplemental Materials.
Results
MF CD34+ cells express different levels of MDM2, TRAIL, and DRs as compared to ND CD34+ cells
We first demonstrated that a higher percentage of MF CD34+ cells were MDM2+ than either ND or PV CD34+ cells (Fig. 1A). This increased expression of MDM2 was not different in MF patients with CALR mutations and with JAK2V617F (Suppl. Fig. 1). The data also showed that the percentage of TRAIL+, DR4+ or DR5+ cells was significantly decreased in MF CD34+ cells as compared to ND CD34+ cells (Fig. 1B, Suppl. Fig. 2).
Treatment with ONC201 and RG7112 induces apoptosis of MF CD34+ cells but not ND CD34+ cells
Treatment with ONC201 or RG7112 alone or in combination for two days did not induce apoptosis of ND CD34+ cells (Fig. 1C, Suppl. Figure 3A), which is reflected by an absence of change in the number of ND CD34+ cells in all treatment groups (Fig. 1D). By contrast, treatment with ONC201 increased apoptosis of MF CD34+ cells in a dose-dependent fashion. Combination treatment with ONC201 + RG7112 induced apoptosis of MF CD34+ cells to a statistically greater degree than either drug alone (Fig. 1E, Suppl. Figure 3B). The CD34+ cell numbers were decreased following treatment with ONC201. The combination of the two drugs led to a significantly greater reduction of MF CD34+ cell numbers than that observed with ONC201 alone (Fig. 1F).
Treatment with ONC201 and RG7112 increased expression of TRAIL and DR5 by MF CD34+ cells but not by ND CD34+ cells
Treatment of ND CD34+ cells with ONC201 or RG7112 alone, or in combination for two days did not increase the percentage of TRAIL+/CD34+ and DR5+/CD34+ cells (Fig. 2A, B, Suppl. Fig. 4A and B). By contrast, treatment with either ONC201 or RG7112 alone increased the percentage of MF TRAIL+/CD34+ and DR5+/CD34+ cells, combination treatment with ONC201 + RG7112 further increased the MF TRAIL+/CD34+ and DR5+/CD34+ cells than that observed with either drug alone (Fig. 2C, D, Suppl. Fig. 4C and D).
Furthermore, we tested TRAIL and DR5 transcripts levels in ND and MF CD34+ cells after treatment with each drug alone or in combination for 16 h. Although treatment of both ND and MF CD34+ cells with ONC201 or RG7112 alone at that time point doses did not increase TRAIL or DR5 transcripts levels, combination treatment synergistically increased transcripts levels of TRAIL and DR5 in MF CD34+ cells but not ND CD34+ cells (Fig. 2E, F). Western blotting showed that treatment with ONC201 and RG7112 alone for two days increased TRAIL and DR5 protein levels while a combination of ONC201 and RG7112 further increased TRAIL and DR5 protein levels (Fig. 2G, H). These data indicate that the combination of ONC201 and RG7112 affects both the transcription and translation of these components of the extrusive apoptosis pathway in MF but not ND CD34+ cells.
Treatment with ONC201 and RG7112 induced apoptosis of MF CD34+ cells by activating both the death signaling pathway and p53 pathway
Activation of p53 by administration of RG7112 upregulates downstream pro-apoptosis genes, such as NOXA, PUMA, and BAX [43]. We then addressed the synergistic effects of treatment with ONC201 + RG7112 on activation of p53 to induce apoptosis. As one can see in Fig. 3, treatment of MF CD34+ cells with ONC201 alone did not increased NOXA, PUMA, and BAX transcript levels, treatment with RG7112 alone slightly increased the transcript levels of these three genes (Fig. 3A–C). While, the combination of ONC201 + RG7112 significantly increased transcript levels of NOXA, PUMA, and BAX (Fig. 3A–C). Western blotting confirmed that the proteins levels of these pro-apoptosis genes were increased (Fig. 3D). By contrast, treatment with ONC201 and RG7112 alone or in combination did not increase NOXA, PUMA, and BAX genes expression in ND CD34+ cells (Fig. 3A–C).
Caspase-3 activation promotes apoptosis due to activation of both the intrinsic (p53 pathway) and extrinsic (death ligand/caspase-8) apoptosis pathways [44]. As we can see in Fig. 3, treatment with either ONC201 or RG7112 increased the levels of cleaved-caspase-8, combination treatment further increase the levels of c-caspase-8 (Fig. 3E). furthermore, ONC201 and RG7112 alone increased cleaved-caspase-3 levels and decreased non-activated caspase 3, the combination of ONC201 + RG7112 doubled the levels of cleaved-caspase-3 as compared to each drug alone (Fig. 3F). These data indicate that combination treatment with ONC201 and RG7112 promote apoptosis of MF cells but not normal cells by activating both p53 and death signaling pathways.
Treatment with ONC201 alone enhanced the effects of upregulated p53 on MF CD34+ cells but not ND CD34+ cells
In order to further confirm the additive effects of ONC201 on activation of p53, we transfected both ND and MF CD34+ cells with human p53 CRISPR activation plasmid to activate TP53 transcription. The transfection efficiency for both ND and MF CD34+ cells was around 40% (Suppl. Fig. 5). TP53 transcript levels were doubled in MF CD34+ cells transfected with p53 CRISPR activation plasmid when compared to cells transfected with control CRISPR activation plasmid after 3 days but not increased in ND CD34+ cells (Fig. 4A), while MDM2 transcript levels were increased to a higher level in ND CD34+ cells than that observed in MF CD34+ cells (Fig. 4B). This observed upregulation of MDM2 may blunt the effects of TP53 on the ND CD34+ cells. Increased TP53 expression in MF CD34+ cells was followed by its downstream target genes such as p21, PUMA, NOXA, and BAX expressing, the levels of these genes were further increased with the addition of ONC201 (Fig. 4C–E). Our results also showed that MF CD34+ cells with upregulated p53 transcription expressed higher levels of both TRAIL and DR5, and treatment with ONC201 further increased TRAIL and DR5 expression in these MF CD34+ cells (Fig. 4F, G). Although one can see the p53 downstream target genes p21, PUMA, and NOXA as well as TRAIL and DR5 were increased to varying degrees in ND CD34 + cells transfected with p53 activation plasmid, treatment with ONC201 did not further increase levels of these genes (Fig. 5C–H). Importantly, MF CD34+ cell numbers were significantly decreased after transfection with p53 activation plasmid, and were further decreased to a greater degree with the addition of ONC201 (Fig. 4I) but not decreased ND CD34 + cells (Fig. 4J).
Treatment of MF CD34+ cells with ONC201 and RG7112 led to increased stress response through endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and mitochondria
To address whether ONC201 affects MF CD34+ cells by also altering ClpP, we evaluated the effects of treatment with ONC201 + RG7112 on transcript and protein levels of this mitochondrial protease. MF CD34+ cells were characterized by increased transcript levels of ClpP as compared to normal CD34+ cells (Fig. 5A). Although treatment with ONC201 and RG7112 alone for 16 h did not further increase ClpP transcript levels, combination treatment did increase ClpP transcript levels (Fig. 5B). In addition, combination treatment increased expression of C/EBP homologous protein (CHOP) transcript levels in MF CD34+ cells but not ND CD34+ cells (Fig. 5C). The data were then confirmed at the protein level by western blotting analysis (Fig. 5D). The ATF4, a transcription factor upstream of CHOP and downstream of ClpP, was modestly increased by treatment with ONC201 or RG7112 alone, yet the combination of ONC201 + RG7112 further increase ATF4 protein levels (Fig. 5D). CHOP is a multifunctional transcription factor that is upregulated in response to a wide variety of stresses [45]. The ATF4/CHOP-mediated integrated stress response leads to TRAIL/ DR5 activation [29]. Although we did not observe the clear results after treatment with ONC201 and RG7112 alone or ONC201 + RG7112 on the levels of phosphorylated protein kinase RNA-like endoplasmic reticulum kinase (PERK), RG7112 and ONC201 + RG7112 increased eukaryotic initiation factor 2 alpha (eIF2α) in MF CD34 + cells (Fig. 5E). The PERK/eIF2α/ATF4/CHOP signaling pathway plays an important roles in mitochondria and ER stress responses [46]. Due to the limited numbers of CD34+ cells present in the small amounts of blood, we were able to obtain from MF patients who were frequently anemic, insufficient cells to further study the effects of these drugs on oxidative phosphorylation were available.
Treatment with ONC201 and RG7112 not only decreased colony numbers formed by MF progenitor cells but also reduced numbers of JAK2V617F + HSPC
We next evaluated whether treatment with ONC201 or RG7112 alone or in combination was capable of reducing the JAK2V617F+ hematopoietic HSPC. CD34+ cells were assayed from 6 NDs and 16 different MF patients, among these MF cases, 12 of 16 were JAK2V617F+ and the remaining 4 were CALR mutation+. Treatment with ONC201 or RG7112 alone or in combination did not decrease colony formation by ND CD34+ cells (Fig. 6A). By contrast, treatment with ONC201 alone decreased the total number of hematopoietic colonies generated by MF CD34+ cells in a dose-dependent fashion. While treatment with ONC201 (10 μM) decreased MF colony numbers by 50%, and RG7112 (500 nM) decreased MF colony numbers by 30%, combination treatment decreased colony numbers by 70% (Fig. 6B). The degree of inhibition of colony numbers observed with each drug alone or combination was similar irrespective of the patient’s with JAK2V617F or CALR mutational status (Suppl. Fig. 6).
To explore the JAK2 genotype of the MF hematopoietic colonies, individual colonies were randomly plucked from 9 different cases of JAK2V617F+ MF and then genotyped. Treatment with ONC201 and RG7112 alone decreased the absolute number of JAK2V617F+ colonies, combination treatment with ONC201 + RG7112 decreased JAK2V617F+ colonies to a greater degree than each drug alone in 9 cases (Fig. 6C). Further analysis data showed that ONC201 alone decreased the absolute number of JAK2V617F+ homozygous colonies by at least 20% in 4 of 9 evaluable cases, and decreased the number of JAK2V617F+ heterozygous colony numbers by 25% in 6 of 9 cases (Table 1, Fig. 6D). Treatment with RG7112 depleted JAK2V617F+ homozygous colony numbers in 2 of 9 evaluable cases, and decreased the absolute number of JAK2V617F+ heterozygous colony number in 7 of 9 cases by 40% (Table 1). The treatment with the ONC201 + RG7112 reduced the total number of both homozygous and heterozygous JAK2V617F+ colonies to a greater extent than either drug alone in each of 9 cases (Table 1, Fig. 6D, E). Combination treatment more effectively depleted JAK2V617F+ heterozygous colonies than JAK2V617F+ homozygous colonies (Fig. 6F). Treatment with ONC201 alone led to the appearance of greater numbers of JAK2WT colonies in 2 of 9 cases, while treatment of cells from 1 of the 9 patients with RG7112 resulted in the generation of greater numbers of JAK2WT colonies. Treatment with ONC201 + RG7112, however, increased the absolute numbers of JAK2WT colonies in 4 of 9 cases and allowed the persistence of JAK2WT colonies in 2 of 9 cases albeit at reduced numbers (Table 1).
Discussion
Ruxolitinib and fedratinib, two competitive JAK2 inhibitors, are the only drugs currently approved to treat MF patients, yet these drugs, although capable of improving symptom burdens, have a modest effect on prolonging patient survival [11,12,13]. These limitations of JAK2 inhibitor therapy are likely due to the lack of specificity of the presently used JAK2 inhibitors resulting in the inhibition of both mutated and WTJAK2 and the accompanying JAK2 oncogenic activation [11,12,13, 47]. Furthermore, the majority of MF patients become resistant or intolerant to ruxolitinib therapy after approximately 3 years of use [48]. Thus, the identification of additional novel approaches to treat MF clearly represents an unmet need. It is anticipated that a successful strategy for treating MF that would culminate in a substantial improvement in overall MF patient survival would ultimately require depletion or elimination of malignant HSPCs, the emergence of normal hematopoiesis and be associated with modest hematological and non-hematological toxicity.
We and others previously reported that the progression of MF to more overt phases of the disease and to MPN-BP is associated with abnormalities in the TP53 pathway including deletion of TP53, acquisition of inactivating mutations, and up-regulation of negative regulators of p53 including MDM2/MDM4 and PPM1D [23]. Rampal et al. have also shown in murine models that expression of JAK2V617F combined with TP53−/− leads to a fully penetrant form of acute leukemia indicating the importance of the loss of p53 activity in disease progression [49, 50]. Due to these multiple abnormalities in TP53 observed with MF disease progression, we planned to combine nutlin with ONC201, a drug that activates the extrinsic apoptosis pathway by increasing the extracellular ligand TRAIL expression which involves the binding of extracellular pro-apoptotic ligands to extracellular death receptors, activating downstream signaling to induce apoptosis [31].
Others have reported that the mechanism of action of ONC201 is reliant on tissue-specific pathways underlying the induced stress response, which differs between tumors [51]. Several groups have reported that the effects of ONC201 were not uniformly dependent on either caspase-8 activation or transcription of TRAIL/DR5 but rather due to pathological disturbances that promote the accumulation of unfolded/misfolded proteins, and targeting mitochondrial respiration [35, 52]. Ishizawa and Graves both showed that ONC201 is capable of promoting AML cell lines apoptosis in the absence of caspase activation by activating ClpP, which leads to selective degradation of mitochondrial structure and function as well as degradation of respiratory protein substrates [35,36,37]. We have demonstrated that MF CD34+ cells are characterized by constitutive elevation of ClpP, the situation as regards to the significance of ClpP elevation between AML and MF cells is, however, not entirely analogous. ONC201 alone upregulated ClpP in AML cells which led to the disruption of oxidative phosphorylation and cell death, these effects of ONC201 on AML cells were shown to be independent of TRAIL, and caspases 3 and 8. In this study, although ONC201 alone and RG7112 alone did not further upregulate MF CD34+ ClpP transcript levels, ONC201 + RG7112 did increase ClpP transcript levels, we also observed that RG7112 and ONC201 + RG7112 increased ClpP protein levels. It indicates that ClpP is upregulated by p53 activation in MF CD34+ cells. RG7112 + ONC201 upregulated ATF4 which has been reported to induce the atypical integrated stress response by ONC201 on AML cells [51]. We also observed that RG7112 alone and RG7112 + ONC201 levels increased the levels of CHOP transcript and protein in MF CD34+ cells, which plays a role in mitochondrial-induced unfolded protein response. We observed that treatment with RG7112 alone or in combination with ONC201 elevated the levels of p-EIF2α in MF CD34+ cells. These data suggest that treatment with ONC201 + RG7112 induces apoptosis in MF CD34+ cells partially though activation of the ER-mitochondrial stress response. Unfortunately, we were unable to evaluate the contribution of ClpP upregulation by ONC201 and RG7112 on MF CD34+ cell oxidative phosphorylation due to inadequate access to the needed numbers of primary MF CD34+ cells to execute such studies. Ishisawa was however, able to test the effects of ONC201 observed a reduction in respiratory chain proteins in primary AML cells [51]. However, imipridone treatment similarly reduced respiratory chain proteins in normal hematopoietic cells. The preferential effect of ONC201 was attributed to the greater sensitivity of AML cells to ClpP activation due to their increased reliance on oxidative phosphorylation which might not be present in MF CD34+ cells [53].
In this study, we have found that TRAIL, DR4, and DR5 were each expressed at lower levels by MF than ND CD34+ cells and treatment of MF CD34+ cells with ONC201 or RG7112 alone upregulated these components of the extrinsic apoptosis pathway which was further accentuated by treatment with a combination of these drugs leading to activation of cleaved caspases 8/3, in the meantime, we also found that ONC201 enhanced activation the intrinsic apoptosis pathway which was induced by treatment with RG7112 alone or direct activation of TP53 transcription. These findings indicate the complementary effects of treatment with ONC201 + RG7112 on targeting MF CD34+ cells.
We have provided evidence that ONC201 and RG7112 induced apoptosis of MF CD34+ cells but not ND CD34+ cells and that the actions of these two drugs were additive on MF CD34+ cell apoptosis. Importantly, we found that treatment with ONC201 could increase the effects of activation of p53, and further decrease MF CD34+ cell numbers. The synergistic effects of combination treatment with ONC201 + RG7112 on apoptosis in MF CD34+ cells occurred partially through activation of the p53 pathway. The effects of combination treatment led to a profound reduction in the absolute number of assayable JAK2V617F+ HSPCs that exceeded the effects of either drug alone. Furthermore, ONC201 + RG7112 was associated with the emergence or persistence of considerable numbers of JAK2WT colonies.
In conclusion, this study indicates that ONC201 is a potentially effective drug for the treatment of MF. The combination of ONC201 + RG7112 selectively targets MF CD34+ cells by inducing apoptosis through both intrinsic and extrinsic apoptosis pathways (Fig. 7). The ability of this drug combination to spare normal CD34+ cells might allow it to be better tolerated in MF patients that have an associated marrow failure state. Such a therapeutic approach would be anticipated to promote the elimination of both TP53-wild type and TP53-mutated MF HSPCs resulting in the depletion of MF but not normal HSPCs and further be issued a clinical trial in MF.
References
Levine RL, Wadleigh M, Cools J, Ebert BL, Wernig G, Huntly BJ, et al. Activating mutation in the tyrosine kinase JAK2 in polycythemia vera, essential thrombocythemia, and myeloid metaplasia with myelofibrosis. Cancer Cell. 2005;7:387–97.
Jatiani SS, Baker SJ, Silverman LR, Reddy EP. Jak/STAT pathways in cytokine signaling and myeloproliferative disorders: approaches for targeted therapies. Genes Cancer. 2010;1:979–93.
Pardanani AD, Levine RL, Lasho T, Pikman Y, Mesa RA, Wadleigh M, et al. MPL515 mutations in myeloproliferative and other myeloid disorders: a study of 1182 patients. Blood. 2006;108:3472–6.
Klampfl T, Gisslinger H, Harutyunyan AS, Nivarthi H, Rumi E, Milosevic JD, et al. Somatic mutations of calreticulin in myeloproliferative neoplasms. N. Engl J Med. 2013;369:2379–90.
Rumi E, Pietra D, Pascutto C, Guglielmelli P, Martinez-Trillos A, Casetti I, et al. Clinical effect of driver mutations of JAK2, CALR, or MPL in primary myelofibrosis. Blood. 2014;124:1062–9.
Alshemmari SH, Rajan R, Emadi A. Molecular pathogenesis and clinical significance of driver mutations in primary myelofibrosis: a review. Med Princ Pr. 2016;25:501–9.
Szuber N, Tefferi A. Driver mutations in primary myelofibrosis and their implications. Curr Opin Hematol. 2018;25:129–35.
Bose P, Verstovsek S. Mutational profiling in myelofibrosis: implications for management. Int J Hematol. 2020;111:192–9.
Levine RL, Wernig G. Role of JAK-STAT signaling in the pathogenesis of myeloproliferative disorders. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program 2006;510:233-9.
Byrne M, Savani B, Savona MR. Leveraging JAK-STAT regulation in myelofibrosis to improve outcomes with allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplant. Ther Adv Hematol. 2018;9:251–9.
Bose P, Verstovsek S. Myelofibrosis: an update on drug therapy in 2016. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2016;17:2375–89.
Tefferi A. Primary myelofibrosis: 2017 update on diagnosis, risk-stratification, and management. Am J Hematol. 2016;91:1262–71.
Lancman G, Mascarenhas J. Should we be treating lower risk myelofibrosis patients with a JAK2 inhibitor? Expert Rev Hematol. 2017;10:23–8.
Mylonas E, Yoshida K, Frick M, Hoyer K, Christen F, Kaeda J, et al. Single-cell analysis based dissection of clonality in myelofibrosis. Nat Commun. 2020;11:73.
Lu M, Wang X, Li Y, Tripodi J, Mosoyan G, Mascarenhas J, et al. Combination treatment in vitro with Nutlin, a small-molecule antagonist of MDM2, and pegylated interferon-alpha 2a specifically targets JAK2V617F-positive polycythemia vera cells. Blood. 2012;120:3098–105.
Nakatake M, Monte-Mor B, Debili N, Casadevall N, Ribrag V, Solary E, et al. JAK2(V617F) negatively regulates p53 stabilization by enhancing MDM2 via La expression in myeloproliferative neoplasms. Oncogene. 2012;31:1323–33.
Lu M, Hoffman R. p53 as a target in myeloproliferative neoplasms. Oncotarget. 2012;3:1052–3.
Lu M, Xia L, Li Y, Wang X, Hoffman R. The orally bioavailable MDM2 antagonist RG7112 and pegylated interferon alpha 2a target JAK2V617F-positive progenitor and stem cells. Blood. 2014;124:771–9.
Plo I. p53 at the crossroads of MPN treatment. Blood. 2014;124:668–9.
Mascarenhas J, Lu M, Kosiorek H, Virtgaym E, Xia L, Sandy L, et al. Oral idasanutlin in patients with polycythemia vera. Blood. 2019;134:525–33.
Michaelis M, Rothweiler F, Barth S, Cinatl J, van Rikxoort M, Loschmann N, et al. Adaptation of cancer cells from different entities to the MDM2 inhibitor nutlin-3 results in the emergence of p53-mutated multi-drug-resistant cancer cells. Cell Death Dis. 2011;2:e243.
Skalniak L, Kocik J, Polak J, Skalniak A, Rak M, Wolnicka-Glubisz A, et al. Prolonged Idasanutlin (RG7388) Treatment Leads to the Generation of p53-Mutated Cells. Cancers 2018;10:396.
Marcellino BK, Farnoud N, Cassinat B, Lu M, Verger E, McGovern E, et al. Transient expansion of TP53 mutated clones in polycythemia vera patients treated with idasanutlin. Blood Adv. 2020;4:5735–44.
Patnaik A, Tolcher A, Beeram M, Nemunaitis J, Weiss GJ, Bhalla K, et al. Clinical pharmacology characterization of RG7112, an MDM2 antagonist, in patients with advanced solid tumors. Cancer Chemother Pharm. 2015;76:587–95.
Andreeff M, Kelly KR, Yee K, Assouline S, Strair R, Popplewell L, et al. Results of the Phase I Trial of RG7112, a Small-Molecule MDM2 Antagonist in Leukemia. Clin Cancer Res. 2016;22:868–76.
Kojima K, Ishizawa J, Andreeff M. Pharmacological activation of wild-type p53 in the therapy of leukemia. Exp Hematol. 2016;44:791–8.
Allen JE, Crowder RN, El-Deiry WS. Correction: first-in-class small molecule ONC201 induces DR5 and cell death in tumor but not normal cells to provide a wide therapeutic index as an anti-cancer agent. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0149365.
Arrillaga-Romany I, Chi AS, Allen JE, Oster W, Wen PY, Batchelor TT. A phase 2 study of the first imipridone ONC201, a selective DRD2 antagonist for oncology, administered every three weeks in recurrent glioblastoma. Oncotarget. 2017;8:79298–304.
Prabhu VV, Morrow S, Rahman Kawakibi A, Zhou L, Ralff M, Ray J, et al. ONC201 and imipridones: Anti-cancer compounds with clinical efficacy. Neoplasia. 2020;22:725–44.
Allen JE, Krigsfeld G, Mayes PA, Patel L, Dicker DT, Patel AS, et al. Dual inactivation of Akt and ERK by TIC10 signals Foxo3a nuclear translocation, TRAIL gene induction, and potent antitumor effects. Sci Transl Med. 2013;5:171ra117.
Crowder RN, El-Deiry WS. Caspase-8 regulation of TRAIL-mediated cell death. Exp Oncol. 2012;34:160–4.
Allen JE, Crowder RN, El-Deiry WS. First-in-class small molecule ONC201 induces DR5 and cell death in tumor but not normal cells to provide a wide therapeutic index as an anti-cancer agent. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0143082.
Allen JE, Krigsfeld G, Patel L, Mayes PA, Dicker DT, Wu GS, et al. Identification of TRAIL-inducing compounds highlights small molecule ONC201/TIC10 as a unique anti-cancer agent that activates the TRAIL pathway. Mol Cancer. 2015;14:99.
Endo Greer Y, Lipkowitz S. ONC201: Stressing tumors to death. Sci Signal. 2016;9:fs1.
Graves PR, Aponte-Collazo LJ, Fennell EMJ, Graves AC, Hale AE, Dicheva N, et al. Mitochondrial Protease ClpP is a Target for the Anticancer Compounds ONC201 and Related Analogues. ACS Chem Biol. 2019;14:1020–9.
Cole A, Wang Z, Coyaud E, Voisin V, Gronda M, Jitkova Y, et al. Inhibition of the mitochondrial protease ClpP as a therapeutic strategy for human acute myeloid leukemia. Cancer Cell. 2015;27:864–76.
Ishizawa J, Zarabi SF, Davis RE, Halgas O, Nii T, Jitkova Y, et al. Mitochondrial ClpP-mediated proteolysis induces selective cancer cell lethality. Cancer Cell. 2019;35:721–37.e729.
Nii T, Prabhu VV, Ruvolo V, Madhukar N, Zhao R, Mu H, et al. Imipridone ONC212 activates orphan G protein-coupled receptor GPR132 and integrated stress response in acute myeloid leukemia. Leukemia. 2019;33:2805–16.
Jacques S, van der Sloot AM, C CH, Coulombe-Huntington J, Tsao S, Tollis S, et al. Imipridone Anticancer Compounds Ectopically Activate the ClpP Protease and Represent a New Scaffold for Antibiotic Development. Genetics. 2020;214:1103–20.
Willms A, Schittek H, Rahn S, Sosna J, Mert U, Adam D, et al. Impact of p53 status on TRAIL-mediated apoptotic and non-apoptotic signaling in cancer cells. PLoS One. 2019;14:e0214847.
Kvasnicka HM. The differential diagnosis of classical myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN): the updated WHO criteria. Rinsho Ketsueki. 2019;60:1166–75.
Tefferi A. Primary myelofibrosis: 2021 update on diagnosis, risk-stratification and management. Am J Hematol. 2021;96:145–62.
Vassilev LT. MDM2 inhibitors for cancer therapy. Trends Mol Med. 2007;13:23–31.
Salvesen GS. Caspases: opening the boxes and interpreting the arrows. Cell Death Differ. 2002;9:3–5.
Kaspar S, Oertlin C, Szczepanowska K, Kukat A, Senft K, Lucas C, et al. Adaptation to mitochondrial stress requires CHOP-directed tuning of ISR. Sci Adv 2021 May 7:eabf0971.
Rozpedek W, Pytel D, Mucha B, Leszczynska H, Diehl JA, Majsterek I. The Role of the PERK/eIF2alpha/ATF4/CHOP signaling pathway in tumor progression during endoplasmic reticulum stress. Curr Mol Med. 2016;16:533–44.
Wang X, Ye F, Tripodi J, Hu CS, Qiu J, Najfeld V, et al. JAK2 inhibitors do not affect stem cells present in the spleens of patients with myelofibrosis. Blood. 2014;124:2987–95.
Harrison CN, Schaap N, Mesa RA. Management of myelofibrosis after ruxolitinib failure. Ann Hematol. 2020;99:1177–91.
Rampal R, Ahn J, Abdel-Wahab O, Nahas M, Wang K, Lipson D, et al. Genomic and functional analysis of leukemic transformation of myeloproliferative neoplasms. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2014;111:E5401–5410.
Tsuruta-Kishino T, Koya J, Kataoka K, Narukawa K, Sumitomo Y, Kobayashi H, et al. Loss of p53 induces leukemic transformation in a murine model of Jak2 V617F-driven polycythemia vera. Oncogene. 2017;36:3300–11.
Ishizawa J, Kojima K, Chachad D, Ruvolo P, Ruvolo V, Jacamo RO, et al. ATF4 induction through an atypical integrated stress response to ONC201 triggers p53-independent apoptosis in hematological malignancies. Sci Signal. 2016;9:ra17.
Ishizawa J, Kojima K, McQueen T, Ruvolo V, Chachad D, Nogueras-Gonzalez GM, et al. Mitochondrial profiling of acute myeloid leukemia in the assessment of response to apoptosis modulating drugs. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0138377.
Sriskanthadevan S, Jeyaraju DV, Chung TE, Prabha S, Xu W, Skrtic M, et al. AML cells have low spare reserve capacity in their respiratory chain that renders them susceptible to oxidative metabolic stress. Blood. 2015;125:2120–30.
Acknowledgements
We thank Dr. John Mascarenhas and Christoph Schaniel for their critical reading of the manuscript. This study was supported by grants from National Cancer Institute (P01 CA108671) to R. Hoffman.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
M.L designed, performed the experiments, analyzed data, and wrote the manuscript. L.X. N.E. C.C. performed the experiments. D.T. collected patients’ information and edited the paper. R.H. designed experiments, analyzed data, and wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the paper.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
41375_2021_1446_MOESM1_ESM.pptx
Combined Drug Targeting of p53-dependent and -independent Pathways Depletes Myelofibrosis Hematopoietic Stem/Progenitor Cells
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Lu, M., Xia, L., Elmansy, N. et al. Combined Drug Targeting of p53-dependent and -independent Pathways Depletes Myelofibrosis Hematopoietic Stem/Progenitor Cells. Leukemia 36, 733–745 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41375-021-01446-4
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41375-021-01446-4