Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia

Prognostic value of high-sensitivity measurable residual disease assessment after front-line chemoimmunotherapy in chronic lymphocytic leukemia

Abstract

Measurable residual disease (MRD) status is widely adopted in clinical trials in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Findings from FILO group trials (CLL2007FMP, CLL2007SA, CLL2010FMP) enabled investigation of the prognostic value of high-sensitivity (0.7 × 10−5) MRD assessment using flow cytometry, in blood (N = 401) and bone marrow (N = 339), after fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab (FCR)-based chemoimmunotherapy in a homogeneous population with long follow-up (median 49.5 months). Addition of low-level positive MRD < 0.01% to MRD ≥ 0.01% increased the proportion of cases with positive MRD in blood by 39% and in bone marrow by 27%. Compared to low-level positive MRD < 0.01%, undetectable MRD was associated with significantly longer progression-free survival (PFS) when using blood (72.2 versus 42.7 months; hazard ratio 0.40, p = 0.0003), but not when using bone marrow. Upon further stratification, positive blood MRD at any level, compared to undetectable blood MRD, was associated with shorter PFS irrespective of clinical complete or partial remission, and a lower 5-year PFS rate irrespective of IGHV-mutated or -unmutated status (all p < 0.05). In conclusion, high-sensitivity (0.0007%) MRD assessment in blood yielded additional prognostic information beyond the current standard sensitivity (0.01%). Our approach provides a model for future determination of the optimal MRD investigative strategy for any regimen.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Study flowchart and analysis populations.
Fig. 2: Event free survival according to classical MRD status.
Fig. 3: Event free survival according to sensitive MRD status.
Fig. 4: Prognostic value of sensitive MRD subsets.
Fig. 5: Prognostic value of combined clinical response and sensitive MRD status.
Fig. 6: Prognostic value of combined IGHV mutational status and sensitive MRD status.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Thompson M, Brander D, Nabhan C, Mato A. Minimal residual disease in chronic lymphocytic leukemia in the era of novel agents. A review. JAMA Oncol. 2018;4:394–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Thompson PA, Wierda WG. Eliminating minimal residual disease as a therapeutic end point: working toward cure for patients with CLL. Blood.2016;127:279–86.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Rawstron AC, Fazi C, Agathangelidis A, Villamor N, Letestu R, Nomdedeu J, et al. A complementary role of multiparameter flow cytometry and high-throughput sequencing for minimal residual disease detection in chronic lymphocytic leukemia: an European Research Initiative on CLL study. Leukemia. 2016;30:929–36.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. European Medicines Agency. Guideline on the use of minimal residue disease as an endpoint in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia studies. EMA/629967/2014. 2014. http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Scientific_guideline/2014/12/WC500179047.pdf. Accessed 16 Sept 2019.

  5. Appleby N, O’Brien D, Quinn FM, Smyth L, Kelly J, Parker I. et al. Risk adjusted therapy in chronic lymphocytic leukemia: a phase II cancer trials Ireland (CTRIAL-IE [ICORG 07-01]) study of fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab therapy evaluating response adapted, abbreviated frontline therapy with FCR in non-del(17p) CLL. Leuk Lymphoma. 2018;59:1338–47.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Dimier N, Delmar P, Ward C, Morariu-Zamfir R, Fingerle-Rowson G, Bahlo J, et al. A model for predicting effect of treatment on progression-free survival using MRD as a surrogate endpoint in CLL. Blood. 2018;131:955–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Stilgenbauer S, Leblond V, Foà R, Böttcher S, Ilhan O, Knauf W, et al. Obinutuzumab plus bendamustine in previously untreated patients with CLL: a subgroup analysis of the GREEN study. Leukemia. 2018;32:1778–86.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kovacs G, Robrecht S, Fink AM, Bahlo J, Cramer P, von Tresckow J, et al. Minimal residual disease assessment improves prediction of outcome in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) who achieve partial response: comprehensive analysis of two phase III studies of the German CLL Study Group. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34:3758–65.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Thompson PA, Tam CS, O’Brien SM, Wierda WG, Stingo F, Plunkett W, et al. Fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab treatment achieves long-term disease-free survival in IGHV-mutated chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Blood. 2016;127:303–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Strati P, Keating MJ, O’Brien SM, Burger J, Ferrajoli A, Jain N, et al. Eradication of bone marrow minimal residual disease may prompt early treatment discontinuation in CLL. Blood. 2014;123:3727–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Böttcher S, Ritgen M, Fischer K, Stilgenbauer S, Busch RM, Fingerle-Rowson G, et al. Minimal residual disease quantification is an independent predictor of progression-free and overall survival in chronic lymphocytic leukemia: a multivariate analysis from the randomized GCLLSG CLL8 trial. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:980–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. ESMO Guidelines Committee. eUpdate—chronic lymphocytic leukaemia treatment. 2017. https://www.esmo.org/Guidelines/Haematological-Malignancies/Chronic-Lymphocytic-Leukaemia/eUpdate-Treatment-Recommendations. Accessed 16 Sept 2019.

  13. Fischer K, Bahlo J, Fink AM, Goede V, Herling CD, Cramer P, et al. Long-term remissions after FCR chemoimmunotherapy in previously untreated patients with CLL: updated results of the CLL8 trial. Blood. 2016;127:208–15.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Davids MS, Brander DM, Kim HT, Tyekucheva S, Bsat J, Savell A, et al. Ibrutinib plus fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab as initial treatment for younger patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia: a single-arm, multicentre, phase 2 trial. Lancet Haematol. 2019;6:e419–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Michallet AS, Dilhuydy MS, Subtil F, Rouille V, Mahe B, Laribi K, et al. Obinutuzumab and ibrutinib induction therapy followed by a minimal residual disease-driven strategy in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (ICLL07 FILO): a single-arm, multicentre, phase 2 trial. Lancet Haematol. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2352-3026(19)30113-9.

  16. Fischer K, Al-Sawaf O, Bahlo J, Fink AM, Tandon M, Dixon M, et al. Venetoclax and obinutuzumab in patients with CLL and coexisting conditions. N Engl J Med. 2019;380:2225–36.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Jain N, Keating M, Thompson P, Ferrajoli A, Burger J, Borthakur G, et al. Ibrutinib and venetoclax for first-line treatment of CLL. N Engl J Med. 2019;380:2095–103.

  18. Stilgenbauer S, Eichhorst B, Schetelig J, Hillmen P, Seymou JF, Coutre S. et al. Venetoclax for patients with 17p deletion: results from the full population of a phase II pivotal trial. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36:1973–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Seymour JP, Kipps TJ, Eichhorst B, Hillmen P, D’Rozario J, Assouline S, et al. Venetoclax-rituximab in relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2018;378:1107–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Fischer K, Al-Sawaf O, Fink AM, Dixon M, Bahlo J, Warburton S, et al. Venetoclax and obinutuzumab in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Blood. 2017;129:2702–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Hillmen P, Rawstron AC, Brock K, Muñoz-Vicente S, Yates FJ, Bishop R, et al. Ibrutinib plus venetoclax in relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia: the CLARITY study. J Clin Oncol. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.19.00894.

  22. Moreno C, Greil R, Demirkan F, Tedeschi A, Anz B, Larratt L, et al. Ibrutinib plus obinutuzumab versus chlorambucil plus obinutuzumab in first-line treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (iLLUMINATE): a multicentre, randomised, openlabel, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2019;20:43–56.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Shanafelt TD, Wang XV, Kay NE, Hanson CA, O’Brien S, Barrientos J, et al. Ibrutinib-rituximab or chemoimmunotherapy for chronic lymphocytic leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2019;381:423–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Coutre S, Choi M, Furman RR, Eradat H, Heffner L, Jones JA, et al. Venetoclax for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia who progressed during or after idelalisib therapy. Blood. 2018;131:1704–11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Jones JA, Mato AR, Wierda WG, Davids MS, Choi M, Cheson BD, et al. Venetoclax for chronic lymphocytic leukaemia progressing after ibrutinib: a multicentre, open-label, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2018;19:65–75.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Stilgenbauer S, Eichhorst B, Schetelig J, Hillmen P, Seymour JF, Coutre S, et al. Venetoclax for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia with 17p deletion: results from the full population of a phase II pivotal trial. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36:1973–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Woyach JA, Ruppert AS, Heerema NA, Zhao W, Booth AM, Ding W, et al. Ibrutinib regimens versus chemoimmunotherapy in older patients with untreated CLL. N Engl J Med. 2018;379:2517–28.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Cramer P, von Tresckow J, Bahlo J, Engelke A, Langerbeins P, Fink A-M, et al. CLL2-BXX phase II trials: sequential, targeted treatment for eradication of minimal residual disease in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Future Oncol. 2018;14:499–513.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. von Tresckow J, Cranmer P, Bahlo J, Robrecht S, Langerbeins P, Fink A-M, et al. CLL2-BIG: sequential treatment with bendamustine, ibrutinib and obinutuzumab (GA101) in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Leukemia. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41375-018-0313-8.

  30. Collett L, Howard DR, Munir T, McParland L, Oughton JB, Rawstron AC, et al. Assessment of ibrutinib plus rituximab in front-line CLL (FLAIR trial): study protocol for a phase III randomised controlled trial. Trials.2017;18:387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Hallek M, Cheson BD, Catovsky D, Caligaris-Cappio F, Dighiero G, Dohner H, et al. iwCLL guidelines for diagnosis, indications for treatment, response assessment, and supportive management of CLL. Blood. 2018;131:2745–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Rawstron AC, Böttcher S, Letestu R, Villamor N, Fazi C, Kartsios H, et al. Improving efficiency and sensitivity: European Research Initiative in CLL (ERIC) update on the international harmonised approach for flow cytometric residual disease monitoring in CLL. Leukemia. 2013;27:142–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Rawstron AC, Villamor N, Ritgen M, Böttcher S, Ghia P, Zehnder JL, et al. International standardized approach for flow cytometric residual disease monitoring in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. Leukemia. 2007;21:956–64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Sartor MM, Gottlieb DJ. A single tube 10-color flow cytometry assay optimizes detection of minimal residual disease in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Cytom B Clin Cytom. 2013;84B:96–103.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Lepretre S, Aurran T, Mahé B, Cazin B, Tournilhac O, Maisonneuve H, et al. Excess mortality after treatment with fludarabine and cyclophosphamide in combination with alemtuzumab in previously untreated patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia in a randomized phase 3 trial. Blood. 2012;119:5104–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Dartigeas C, Van Den Neste E, Léger J, Maisonneuve H, Berthou C, Dilhuydy M-S, et al. Rituximab maintenance versus observation following abbreviated induction with chemoimmunotherapy in elderly patients with previously untreated chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL 2007 SA): an open-label, randomised phase 3 study. Lancet Haematol. 2018;5:e82–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Dartigeas C, Van Den Neste E, Berthou C, Maisonneuve H, Leprêtre S, Dilhuydy M-S, et al. Evaluating abbreviated induction with fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and dose-dense rituximab in elderly patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Leuk Lymphoma. 2016;57:328–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Cartron G, Letetsu R, Dartigeas C, Tout M, Mahé B, Gagez AL, et al. Increased rituximab exposure does not improve response and outcome of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia after fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, rituximab. A French Innovative Leukemia Organization (FILO) study. Haematologica. 2018;103:e356–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Hallek M, Fischer K, Fingerle-Rowson G, Fink AM, Busch R, Mayer J, et al. Addition of rituximab to fludarabine and cyclophosphamide in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia: a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2010;376:1164–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Rosenquist R, Ghia P, Hadzidimitriou A, Sutton L-A, Agathangelidis A, Baliakas P, et al. Immunoglobulin gene sequence analysis in chronic lymphocytic leukemia: updated ERIC recommendations. Leukemia. 2017;31:1477–81.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Hallek M, Cheson BD, Catovsky D, Caligaris-Cappio F, Dighiero G, Dohner H, et al. Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia: a report from the International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia updating the National Cancer Institute-Working Group 1996 guidelines. Blood. 2008;111:5446–56.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Eichhorst B, Fink AM, Bahlo J, Busch R, Kovacs G, Maurer C, et al. First-line chemoimmunotherapy with bendamustine and rituximab versus fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab in patients with advanced chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL10): an international, open-label, randomised, phase 3, non-inferiority trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17:928–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Kater AP, Seymour JF, Hillmen P, Eichhorst B, Langerak AW, Owen C, et al. Fixed duration of venetoclax-rituximab in relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia eradicates minimal residual disease and prolongs survival: post-treatment follow-up of the MURANO phase III study. J Clin Oncol. 2019;37:269–77.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Cath Carsberg, Ph.D. for medical writing assistance in the preparation of this paper; Roche kindly provided funding for this assistance.

French Innovative Leukemia Organization (FILO)

Sylvie Cailleres24, Gandhi Damaj25, Bruno Royer25, Martine Gardembas26, Mamoun Dib26, Matgorzata Truchan-Graczyk26, Mathilde Hunault26, Charles Foussard26, Bernadette Corront27, Anne Parry27, Frédérique Orsini-Piocelle27, Sébastien Trouillier28, Bohiane Slama29, Gérard Lepeu29, Hacene Zerazhi29, Olivier Boulat29, Ahmed Azzedine29, Carla Araujo30, Anne Banos30, Frédéric Bauduer30, Jean-Luc Dutel31, Kamel Ghomari31, Eric Deconinck32, Annie Brion32, Jacqueline Vuillier32, Alain Saad33, Abderrazak EL Yamani34, Philippe Rodon34, Pierre Soubeyran35, Gabriel Etienne35, Marie-Sarah Dilhuydy36, Krimo Bouabdallah36, Thibaut Leguay36, Bachra Chouffi37, Bertrand Pollet37, Abdallah Maakaroun38, Gaëlle Guillerm39, Christian Berthou39, Nathalie Cheron40, Marc André41, Jean Pierre Vilque42, Christophe Fruchart42, Laurent Voillat43, Gian Matteo Pica44, Sélim Corm45, Jean-Michel Micléa46, Bertrand Souleau47, Cécile Molucon-Chabrot48, Benoit De Renzis48, Olivier Tournilhac48, Jacques-Olivier Bay48, Carine Chaleteix48, Romain Guieze48, Joel Fleury49, Cristina Precupanu50, Selwa Bouledroua51, Stéphanie Haiat51, Charlotte Petitdidier51, Jehan Dupuis52, Karim Belhadj52, Olivier Casasnovas53, Jean-Noel Bastie53, Emmanuelle Ferrant53, Dany Gholam54, Lysiane Molina55, Frédéric Garban55, Mourad Tiab56, Hervé Maisonneuve56, Bruno Villemagne56, Dominique Jacomy57, Caroline Besson58, Gérard Tertian58, Kamel Laribi59, Pierre Morel60, Bruno Cazin61, Stéphane Moreau62, Liliane Reminieras62, Marie-José Rapp62, Philippe Moreau63, Catherine Sebban64, Anne-Sophie Michallet64, Gilles Salles65, Florence Broussais65, Thérèse Aurran-Schleinitz66, Diane Coso66, Wajed Abarah67, Claire Kulekci68, Véronique Dorvaux69, Philippe Carassou69, Isabelle Guibaud69, Bernard Christian70, Carlos Graux71, Jean-François Rossi72, Philippe Quittet72, Guillaume Cartron72, Alain Dubois73, Jean-Claude Eisenmann74, Bernard Drénou74, Nadine Morineau75, Béatrice Mahé76, Jean-Michel Karsenti77, Eric Jourdan78, Eric Legouffe79, Magda Alexis-Vigier80, Jean-Michel Boulet80, Malek Aoudjhane81, Catherine Thiéblemont82, Anna Lisa Andreoli82, Florence Cymbalista83, Vincent Lévy83, François Dreyfus84, Véronique Leblond85, Sylvain Choquet85, Karim Maloum85, Hélène Merle-Béral85, Anne Vekhoff81, Didier Decaudin86, Philippe Brault86, Richard Delarue87, Maud Janvier88, Carole Soussain88, Xavier Vallantin89, Laurence Sanhes89, Brigitte Dreyfus90, Cécile Tomowiak90, Riad Benramdane91, Hugo Gonzalez91, Anne Blaise-Brenna92, Brigitte Kolb92, Alain Delmer92, Charles Dauriac93, Roch Houot93, Martine Escoffre-Barbe93, Thierry Lamy93, Sophie De Guibert93, Marc Bernard93, Bernard Grosbois94, Oana Brehar95, Stéphane Leprêtre95, Patrick Morice96, Denis Guyotat97, Jérome Jaubert97, Christelle Portois97, Luc-Matthieu Fornecker98, Raoul Herbrecht98, Karin Bilger98, Shanti Ame98, Loic Ysebaert99, Caroline Dartigeas100, Pierre Feugier101, Pascal Godmer102, Henry Jardel102

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Rémi Letestu or Florence Cymbalista.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

RL has received honoraria or speaker’s fee from ABBVIE, ROCHE, JANSSEN; has consulting or advisory role for ABBVIE; has to disclose funding for travel, accommodations, or expenses from ABBVIE and JANSSEN. AD has received honoraria or speaker’s fee from ABBVIE. LB has received honoraria or speaker’s fee from ABBVIE. MLG-T has received honoraria or speaker’s fee from ABBVIE and JANSSEN. MCB has received honoraria or speaker’s fee from BMS, JANSSEN; has to disclose funding for travel, accommodations, or expenses from CHUGAI. CD has received honoraria or speaker’s fee from ROCHE, JANSSEN; has to disclose funding for travel, accommodations, or expenses from ROCHE, GILEAD, ABBVIE. EVDN has consulting or advisory role for ROCHE, MUNDIPHARMA. PF has received honoraria or speaker’s fee from ROCHE, JANSSEN, GILEAD, ABBVIE; has consulting or advisory role for ROCHE, JANSSEN, GILEAD, ABBVIE; has received research funding from ROCHE, JANSSEN, GILEAD; has to disclose funding for travel, accommodations, or expenses from ROCHE, JANSSEN, GILEAD, ABBVIE. GC has received honoraria or speaker’s fee from SANOFI, ROCHE, JANSSEN, GILEAD; has consulting or advisory role for CELGENE, ROCHE. V Leblond has received honoraria or speaker’s fee from ROCHE, ABBVIE, AMGEN, GILEAD, JANSSEN; has consulting or advisory role for ROCHE, ABBVIE, GILEAD, JANSSEN; has to disclose funding for travel, accommodations, or expenses from ROCHE, ABBVIE. V Lévy has consulting or advisory role for ABBVIE, JANSSEN, ROCHE, OCTAPHARMA; has to disclose funding for travel, accommodations, or expenses from ABBVIE, JANSSEN, GILEAD. FC has received honoraria or speaker’s fee from JANSSEN, GILEAD, ABBVIE, SUNESIS; has consulting or advisory role for ABBVIE; has received research funding from SUNESIS (institution); has to disclose funding for travel, accommodations, or expenses from ROCHE, ABBVIE, GILEAD. MB, LC, BC, A Debliquis, BD, M-CJ, EL, A-CL, MT, CQ, NR, CA, SK, RD, SV, VR, and SL declare no potential competing interests that relate to this report.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Members of the French Innovative Leukemia Organization (FILO) are listed below Acknowledgements.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Letestu, R., Dahmani, A., Boubaya, M. et al. Prognostic value of high-sensitivity measurable residual disease assessment after front-line chemoimmunotherapy in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Leukemia 35, 1597–1609 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41375-020-01009-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41375-020-01009-z

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links