Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Assessment of pulmonary artery size at birth as a prognostic factor in congenital diaphragmatic hernia: results of a multicenter study in Japan

Journal of Perinatology volume 43, pages 1295–1300 (2023)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Objective

To assess the reliability of pulmonary artery (PA) parameters as a prognostic marker in neonates with isolated left-sided congenital diaphragmatic hernia (IL-CDH).

Study design

A retrospective cohort study conducted by the Japanese CDH Study Group (JCDHSG).

Results

323 IL-CDH patients registered with the JCDHSG were included. 272 patients survived to 90 days of age. Right PA (RPA) and left PA (LPA) diameters and pulmonary artery index (PAIndex) at birth were significantly larger in survivors. The cutoff values of RPA and LPA diameters and PAIndex for survival up to 90 days were 3.2 mm, 2.8 mm and 83.7, respectively, and logistic regression analysis showed that these were significantly related to survival. Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that both the PA parameters and liver herniation were significantly related to survival.

Conclusions

The three PA parameters at birth can predict clinical outcomes and are considered as independent risk factors of liver herniation.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Learn more

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves of the parameters.
Fig. 2: Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves of the combination of the parameters.

Data availability

The datasets generated and/analyzed during current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Bagolan P, Morini F. Long-term follow up of infants with congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Semin Pediatr Surg. 2007;16:134–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Grover TR, Murthy K, Brozanski B, Gien J, Rintoul N, Keene S, et al. Children’s Hospitals Neonatal Consortium: Short-term outcomes and medical and surgical interventions in infants with congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Am J Perinatol. 2015;32:1038–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Boloker J, Bateman DA, Wung JT, Stolar CJ. Congenital diaphragmatic hernia in 120 infants treated consecutively with permissive hypercapnia/spontaneous respiration/elective repair. J Pediatr Surg. 2002;37:357–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kitano Y, Nakagawa S, Kuroda T, Honna T, Ito Y, Nakamura T, et al. Liver position in fetal congenital diaphragmatic hernia retains a prognostic value in the era of lung-protective strategy. J Pediatr Surg. 2005;40:1827–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lusk LA, Wai KC, Moon-Grady AJ, Basta AM, Filly R, Keller RL. Fetal ultrasound markers of severity predict resolution of pulmonary hypertension in congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;213:e211–e218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Jani JC, Benachi A, Nicolaides KH, Allegaert K, Gratacos E, Mazkereth R, et al. Antenatal-CDH-Registry Group: Prenatal prediction of neonatal morbidity in survivors with congenital diaphragmatic hernia: a multicenter study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009;33:64–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Fauza DO, Wilson JM. Congenital diaphragmatic hernia and associated anomalies: their incidence, identification, and impact on prognosis. J Pediatr Surg. 1994;29:1113–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kitagawa M, Hislop A, Boyden EA, Reid L. Lung hypoplasia in congenital diaphragmatic hernia: a quantitative study of airway, artery, and alveolar development. Br J Surg. 1971;58:342–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kluth D, Keijer R, Hertl M, Tibboel D. Embryology of congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Semin Pediatr Surg. 1996;5:224–33.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sokol J, Bohn D, Lacro RV, Ryan G, Stephens D, Rabinovitch M, et al. Fetal pulmonary artery diameters and their association with lung hypoplasia and postnatal outcome congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Am J Ostet Gynecol. 2002;186:1085–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Sokol J, Shimizu N, Bohn D, Doherty D, Ryan G, Hornberger LK. Fetal pulmonary artery diameter measurements as a predictor of morbidity in antenatally diagnosed congenital diaphragmatic hernia: A prospective study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;195:470–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Okazaki T, Okawada M, Shiyanagi S, Shoji H, Shimizu T, Tanaka T, et al. Significance of pulmonary artery size and blood flow as a predictor of outcome in congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Pediatr Surg Int. 2008;24:1369–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Yamoto M, Inamura N, Terui K, Nagata K, Kanamori Y, Hayakawa M, et al. Echocardiographic predictors of poor prognosis in congenital diaphragmatic Hernia. J Pediatr Surg. 2016;51:1926–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Takahashi S, Oishi Y, Ito N, Nanba Y, Tsukamoto K, Nakamura T, et al. Evaluating mortality and disease severity in congenital diaphragmatic hernia using the McGoon and pulmonary artery indices. J Pediatr Surg. 2009;44:2101–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology. 1982;143:29–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hasegawa S, Kohno S, Sugiyama T, Sato Y, Seki S, Yagyu M, et al. Usefulness of echocardiographic measurement of bilateral pulmonary artery dimensions in congenital diaphragmatic hernia. J Pediatr Surg. 1994;29:622–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Okazaki T, Kohno S, Hasegawa S, Urushihara N, Yoshida A, Kawano S, et al. Congenital diaphragmatic hernia: efficacy of ultrasound examination in its management. Pediatr Surg Int. 2003;19:176–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Okazaki T, Nakazawa N, Ogasawara Y, Shoji H, Shimizu T, Makino S, et al. Increase in fetal pulmonary artery diameters during late gestation is a predictor of outcome in congenital diaphragmatic hernia with liver herniation. J Pediatr Surg. 2011;46:2254–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Piehlaer JM, Danielson GK, McGoon DC, Wallace RB, Fulton RE, Mair DD. Management of pulmonary artery with ventricular septal defect and hypoplastic pulmonary arteries by right ventricular outflow construction. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1980;80:552–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Nakata S, Imai Y, Takanashi Y, Kurosawa H, Tezuka K, Nakazawa M, et al. A new method for the quantitative standardization of cross-sectional areas of the pulmonary arteries in congenital heart disease with decreased pulmonary blood flow. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1984;88:610–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Suda K, Bigras JL, Bohn D, Hornberger LK, McCrindle BW. Echocardiographic predictors of outcome in newborns with congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Pediatrics. 2000;105:1106–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Casaccia G, Crescenzi F, Dotta A, Capolupo I, Braguglia A, Danhaive O, et al. Birth weight and McGoon Index predict mortality in newborns with congenital diaphragmatic hernia. J Pediatr Surg. 2006;41:25–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank all members of JCDHSG for managements of patients and registrations to the database of JCDHSG. Funding: This study was funded by the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare of Japan (Grant/Award Number: H24-Ninchi-Ippan-034).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Pediatric Surgery, Juntendo University Urayasu Hospital, Chiba, Japan

    Tadaharu Okazaki

  2. Department of Pediatric Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan

    Keita Terui

  3. Department of Pediatric Surgery, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan

    Kouji Nagata

  4. Center for Maternal-Neonatal Care, Nagoya University Hospital, Nagoya, Japan

    Masahiro Hayakawa

  5. Department of Pediatric Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan

    Hiroomi Okuyama

  6. Division of Neonatology, National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan

    Shoichiro Amari

  7. Department of Pediatric Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan

    Kouji Masumoto

  8. Department of Pediatric Surgery, Shizuoka Children’s Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan

    Masaya Yamoto

  9. Department of Pediatrics, Kindai University, Faculty of Medicine, Osaka-Sayama, Japan

    Noboru Inamura

  10. Departments of Neonatology, Kanagawa Children’s Medical Center, Yokohama, Japan

    Katsuaki Toyoshima

  11. Department of Pediatric Surgery, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan

    Taizo Furukawa

  12. Department of Pediatric General and Urogenital Surgery, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan

    Manabu Okawada

  13. Department of Pediatric Surgery, Hyogo Children’s Hospital, Hyogo, Japan

    Akiko Yokoi

  14. Department of Pediatric Surgery, Mie University, Mie, Japan

    Yuki Koike

  15. Medical Technology Innovation Center, Clinical Research and Trial Center, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan

    Shuko Nojiri & Naotake Yanagisawa

  16. Division of Medial education, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan

    Yuji Nishizaki

  17. Department of Pediatric Surgery, Osaka Women’s and Children’s Hospital, Izumi, Japan

    Noriaki Usui

Authors
  1. Tadaharu Okazaki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Keita Terui
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kouji Nagata
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Masahiro Hayakawa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Hiroomi Okuyama
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Shoichiro Amari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Kouji Masumoto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Masaya Yamoto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Noboru Inamura
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Katsuaki Toyoshima
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Taizo Furukawa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Manabu Okawada
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Akiko Yokoi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Yuki Koike
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Shuko Nojiri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Yuji Nishizaki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  17. Naotake Yanagisawa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  18. Noriaki Usui
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

TO, KT, OH, SA, and NI made substantial contributions to the study conception and design. All authors performed clinical data collection. SN, YN, and NY made substantial contributions to statistical analysis and data interpretation. TO drafted the manuscript, and KT, MH, OH, KN, and NU reviewed the manuscript and provided critical feedback. All authors approved the final manuscript as submitted and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tadaharu Okazaki.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethical approval

The protocol of this study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Osaka University Hospital (approval number 11017) and the committees at all participating institutions. The investigation was performed in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and the Ethical Guidelines for Medical and Health Research Involving Human Subjects.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Okazaki, T., Terui, K., Nagata, K. et al. Assessment of pulmonary artery size at birth as a prognostic factor in congenital diaphragmatic hernia: results of a multicenter study in Japan. J Perinatol 43, 1295–1300 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-023-01750-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-023-01750-0

Search

Advanced search

Quick links